Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 7 minor 40 references

On the canonical bundle formula and effective birationality for Fano varieties in char $p>0$

T0 review · 4 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read The paper establishes effective birationality for strongly F-regular weak Fano varieties in characteristic p>0: from dimension and Gorenstein index alone, fixed n,m give vol(-nK_X)>(2d)^d and a birational |-mK_X|.

desk verdict New results on normalization and the threefold canonical bundle formula are worth taking seriously, but the effective birationality theorem is not proved as written: it rests on an unproved bounded-covering statement and the induction step has a numerical gap. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.12041 v3 pith:2ELPUFD2 submitted 2025-01-21 math.AG

classification math.AG MSC 14E3014J4514G1713A35
keywords FanovarietiespositivecharacteristiceffectivebirationalityF-singularitiesstrongF-regularcanonicalbundleformulaboundednessBABconjecture
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper works in characteristic $p>0$, where the standard boundedness tools from characteristic $0$ fail because vanishing theorems break down. Its central result is an effective birationality statement for weak Fano varieties with good F-singularities: if $X$ is strongly F-regular, of fixed dimension $d$, and has Gorenstein index $I$ not divisible by $p$, then there are integers $n$ and $m$, depending only on $d$ and $I$, such that $\operatorname{vol}(-nK_X)>(2d)^d$ and the linear system $|-mK_X|$ defines a birational map. This gives a positive-characteristic analogue of the effective birationality predicted by the BAB conjecture, restricted to the F-regular setting. Along the way the paper proves that boundedness is stable under normalization, and it establishes a usable canonical bundle formula for threefold Fano-type fibrations over bases of positive dimension in large characteristic, together with adjunction formulas on non-klt centers.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the interplay between F-pure centers and F-adjunction. An F-pure center is a closed subvariety where a pair $(X,\Delta)$ is sharply F-pure but not strongly F-regular; it is, roughly, the minimal locus where the Frobenius splitting degenerates. For such a center $W$, F-adjunction gives a canonical divisor relation $(K_W+\Delta_W)=(K_X+\Delta)|_W$, with the Cartier index of $K_W+\Delta_W$ controlled by that of $K_X+\Delta$. The paper's engine is Remark 4.1, which asserts that an ample $\mathbb{Q}$-divisor $D$ with $\operatorname{vol}(D)\ge(2d)^d$ yields, for any two general points $x,y$, a boundary $\Delta\sim_{\mathbb{Q}} D$ that is F-pure at $x$ with a unique F-pure center from a fixed finite family covering $X$ and not F-regular at $y$; this lets the argument induct on the center's dimension via Lemma 4.3, which cuts the center down by adding an ample divisor whose restriction to the center has degree $>k^k$.

What would settle it

To settle the central claim, one could look for a strongly F-regular weak Fano variety $X$ of dimension $d$ with $IK_X$ Cartier and $p\nmid I$ such that the minimal $m$ with $|-mK_X|$ birational is not bounded in terms of $d$ and $I$, or such that $\operatorname{vol}(-nK_X)\le(2d)^d$ for all $n$ in the range allowed by the proof. More directly, one can test the unproved assertion of Remark 4.1: exhibit an ample $\mathbb{Q}$-divisor $D$ on some $X$ with $\operatorname{vol}(D)\ge(2d)^d$ and two general points $x,y$ for which every $\Delta\sim_{\mathbb{Q}}D$ either fails to be F-pure at $x$ with a unique F-pure center in the claimed finite family, or is F-regular at $y$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is Theorem 4.4: for fixed natural numbers $d$ and $I$ with $p\nmid I$, there exist integers $n$ and $m$ depending only on $d$ and $I$ such that every strongly F-regular weak Fano variety $X$ of dimension $d$ with $IK_X$ Cartier satisfies $\operatorname{vol}(-nK_X)>(2d)^d$ and $|-mK_X|$ gives a birational map. The proof produces, for each such $X$, a bounded covering family of F-pure centers and then runs an induction on the dimension of these centers: an ample-divisor cutting lemma shrinks the F-pure center while preserving sharp F-purity at one general point and non-F-regularity at a second, until the center is a point, at which point an F-potentially birational divisor theorem forces the relevant anti-canonical linear system to separate points. A corollary replaces the Gorenstein-index hypothesis by a lower bound on the F-signature, giving $m$ depending only on the dimension and the F-signature bound.

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on an unproved assertion, Remark 4.1, that from any ample $\mathbb{Q}$-divisor $D$ with $\operatorname{vol}(D)\ge(2d)^d$ one can always find, for any two general points $x$ and $y$, a boundary $\Delta\sim_{\mathbb{Q}} D$ whose only F-pure center containing $x$ is a subvariety from a fixed finite family covering $X$, while the pair is not F-regular at $y$; if that assertion fails, the effective birationality conclusion is unsupported.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For fixed $d$ and $I$ with $p\nmid I$, all strongly F-regular weak Fano $d$-folds with $IK_X$ Cartier share a single anti-canonical linear system $|-mK_X|$ that is birational, so their images in projective space have bounded degree.
  • Corollary 4.5: if instead of fixing the Gorenstein index one assumes $X$ is $\epsilon$-strongly F-regular, the same birationality holds with $m$ depending only on $d$ and $\epsilon$, because a uniform multiple of $K_X$ is Cartier.
  • Since volumes and Gorenstein indices are bounded for bounded families, the theorem gives a new boundedness statement: the set of strongly F-regular weak Fano varieties with fixed dimension and Gorenstein index not divisible by $p$ is birationally bounded.
  • The canonical bundle formula of Theorem 3.3 implies that a contraction of a threefold of Fano type is again of Fano type in large characteristic when the general fibers are normal and a uniform multiple of the relative canonical divisor is Cartier.
  • Theorem 2.4 shows boundedness is stable under normalization in arbitrary characteristic, so future boundedness arguments may assume varieties are normal without loss.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the proof only needs sharp F-purity and F-adjunction, a natural extension would be to replace strong F-regularity by klt or lc with a uniform Cartier index in large characteristic; if Remark 4.1 can be proved in that setting, effective birationality would follow for $\epsilon$-lc weak Fano varieties, closely matching the BAB prediction.
  • The dependence of the canonical bundle formula on a characteristic threshold $p_0=p_0(\Phi)$ suggests that any counterexample to effective birationality in char $p$ would have to live in small characteristic relative to the boundary coefficients or the Gorenstein index; a systematic search over small $p$ for Fano threefolds with unbounded $m$ would test this.
  • The normalization-stability theorem removes a known obstruction to reducing boundedness questions to normal varieties in char $p$, so one could combine it with the canonical bundle formula to attempt a full BAB-type boundedness statement for $\epsilon$-lc threefolds by first normalizing and then applying the induction on F-pure centers; the author does not carry out this step.
  • The volume threshold $(2d)^d$ and the cutting condition $H^k\cdot Z>k^k$ appear to be the exact analogues of the characteristic-0 thresholds, suggesting the same effective-birationality constants could hold uniformly in all characteristics once the missing assertion is supplied.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 7 minor

Summary. This paper studies birational geometry in positive characteristic. It proves that boundedness is stable under normalizations (Theorem 2.4), establishes a canonical bundle formula for klt threefold Fano fibrations over positive-dimensional base in sufficiently large characteristic (Theorem 3.3), applies this to non-klt center adjunction (Theorems 3.4-3.5) and to preservation of Fano type under contractions (Corollary 3.6), and proves an effective birationality statement for strongly F-regular weak Fano varieties with bounded Gorenstein index (Theorem 4.4), with a corollary for epsilon-strongly F-regular varieties (Corollary 4.5). The main emphasis is Theorem 4.4, which aims at a positive-characteristic analogue of Birkar's effective birationality in the F-regular, bounded-index setting.

Significance. If Theorem 4.4 were established, it would be a significant step toward effective birationality and BAB-type boundedness in positive characteristic. The earlier sections also contain useful tools: Theorem 2.4 is a clean characteristic-free boundedness observation, Theorem 3.3 is a usable canonical bundle formula for threefold Fano fibrations, and Corollaries 1.4-1.5 are likely to be useful for complement constructions. The paper is not circular: it derives results from external theorems such as the three-dimensional MMP, F-adjunction, and boundedness of geometrically integral del Pezzo surfaces. However, the central Theorem 4.4 is currently a conditional statement, because the covering-family engine in Remark 4.1 is asserted rather than proved, and the induction in its proof has a concrete numerical inconsistency.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 4, Remark 4.1] The assertion that an ample Q-divisor D with vol(D) >= (2d)^d gives a bounded covering family of F-pure centers is the engine of Theorem 4.4, but it is not proved. The preceding paragraph only explains why potential birationality does not automatically become F-potential birationality, and the sentence 'combine the statements above and [HMX14, 7.1] and some tie breaking arguments' is not a proof. In characteristic 0 the analogous statement is a deep theorem of Birkar and depends on ACC for log canonical thresholds; [HMX14] is a characteristic-0 result and does not directly control F-pure centers in positive characteristic. Moreover, the phrase 'bounded covering family' is not defined in the paper, and the uniformity over a sequence of varieties is unclear. Since Theorem 4.4 invokes this statement for a sequence of varieties of arbitrary dimension, the main theorem is currently conditional on an unproved assertion.
  2. [Section 4, proof of Theorem 4.4] The induction step contains a numerical inconsistency. With Delta_i ~Q -(n+1)K_{X_i} and A ~Q H = -lnK_{X_i}, Lemma 4.3 produces (1-delta)Delta_i + cA with 0<c<1, whose divisor class is -((1-delta)(n+1)+cln)K_{X_i}. The proof then asserts a replacement Delta'_i ~Q -4lnK_{X_i}. Equating these classes forces c = 4 - (1-delta)(n+1)/(ln), which for l>=1 and large n is at least about 3, contradicting c<1. Thus the stated application of Lemma 4.3 does not produce the claimed boundary, and the dimension-decreasing induction is not closed as written.
  3. [Section 4, Theorem 4.4 and Definition 4.1] Theorem 4.4 is stated for every dimension d, but its proof uses F-potential birationality and Theorem 4.1, whose definition requires X to admit a resolution of singularities. In positive characteristic, resolution of singularities is not known beyond dimension 3. The k=0 branch of the proof therefore does not apply to the stated generality. Either the theorem should be restricted to d<=3, or a resolution-free argument (for example via alterations) must be supplied.
  4. [Section 4, proof of Theorem 4.4, boundedness of l] The assertion that 'l is bounded' after F-adjunction is too terse. Here l_i is the smallest integer with vol(-lnK_{X_i}|_{G_i}) > k^k, and a uniform bound requires a lower bound on vol(-K_{X_i}|_{G_i}) for all i. The proof mentions that IK_X|_G is Cartier but does not state the volume lower bound that would follow from this. This is probably repairable, but it should be written out explicitly.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Section 3, Theorem 3.3(1)] In the proof, the bound p0 >= 2/min(Phi) is used, but if 0 is in Phi the minimum is 0 and p0 is undefined. The statement should either require Phi to be contained in (0,1] or the proof should discard zero coefficients.
  2. [Section 4, proof of Theorem 4.4] The reference to 'Theorem 3.8' is incorrect: the F-adjunction statement used here is Theorem 3.7. Please correct the cross-reference.
  3. [Section 1, Corollary 1.4] The introduction refers to 'Theorem 3.5, 3.6', while the body numbers the relevant statements as Theorem 3.4 and Theorem 3.5. The numbering should be harmonized.
  4. [Section 2, Theorem 2.4] The statement has a typo: 'a family P of projective varieties k' should read 'over k'. The proof of the positive-characteristic part is dense; in particular, the key openness assertion for geometric normality should be stated explicitly with a precise reference.
  5. [Section 4, Corollary 4.5] The application of [BCRG+17, 4.8] gives that [1/epsilon+1]!K_X is Cartier, which may be divisible by p. Since the hypothesis is that the Gorenstein index is not divisible by p, the proof should explicitly pass to the actual index, which divides this factorial, rather than applying Theorem 4.4 with the factorial itself.
  6. [Section 2, Remark 2.2 and references] There are small textual issues: 'can be defined defined' should be 'can be defined', and the reference [Hot22] spells the author's name 'Hotchster' instead of 'Hochster'.
  7. [Section 4, Theorem 4.1] The notation T^0(Z,D_Z) is used without definition. It appears to be the intersection of images of trace maps over finite covers, but it should be defined explicitly before use.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper's main claims are not derived from their own conclusions; the proof has unproved and numerically inconsistent steps, but those are correctness gaps, not circular reductions.

full rationale

The derivation chain is not circular. Theorem 4.4 is built from external inputs: the volume computation from nef-and-big Cartier divisors, F-adjunction from Schwede [Sch09], the MMP and boundedness results of Birkar, Bernasconi-Martin, Witaszek, Benozzo, and the F-singularity machinery of Blickle-Schwede-Tucker and Patakfalvi-Schwede-Zhang. No parameter is fitted to the target birationality statement, and no self-citation is load-bearing; indeed the paper contains no self-citations, since the author's own prior work is not invoked. The main weakness is not circularity but incompleteness: Remark 4.1 in Section 4 asserts, without proof, the bounded covering family of F-pure centers that powers the induction in Theorem 4.4, and the induction step replacing Delta_i ~_Q -(n+1)K_X by Delta'_i ~_Q -4lnK_X via Lemma 4.3 appears numerically incompatible with the lemma's requirement 0<c<1. These are proof gaps, not reductions of the claimed result to its own inputs, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on no fitted parameters and introduce no new mathematical entities. They rely on a portfolio of standard theorems (MMP, F-adjunction, boundedness of del Pezzo surfaces) plus one unproved assertion (Remark 4.1) and an implicit resolution assumption for arbitrary dimension.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Existence of MMP for three-dimensional klt pairs over bases in characteristic p > 5.
    Invoked as Theorem 2.2 to run minimal model programs in the proof of Theorem 3.3.
  • standard math Resolution of singularities for three-dimensional varieties in positive characteristic.
    Cited as Theorem 2.1 and used to reduce to smooth models in the proof of Theorem 3.3.
  • standard math ACC for log canonical thresholds in dimension 2.
    Used in Theorem 3.4 to ensure the set of discriminant coefficients is DCC.
  • standard math Boundedness of geometrically integral del Pezzo surfaces over Spec Z (Bernasconi-Martin).
    Used in the dim Z=1 case of Theorem 3.3 to bound the generic fiber (X_eta,B_eta).
  • ad hoc to paper Existence of a bounded covering family of F-pure centers as stated in Remark 4.1.
    This is an unproved assertion introduced by the paper and used as the main input for the induction in Theorem 4.4.
  • domain assumption Resolution of singularities (or alteration substitute) for strongly F-regular Fano varieties of arbitrary dimension in positive characteristic.
    The definition of F-potentially birational in Theorem 4.1 requires X to admit a resolution; Theorem 4.4 is stated for all d, where resolution is unknown.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the canonical bundle formula and effective birationality for Fano varieties in char $p>0$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2ELPUFD2

@misc{pith2026250112041,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the canonical bundle formula and effective birationality for Fano varieties in char $p>0$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2ELPUFD2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.12041}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper, we give some results on the birational geometry of varieties of Fano type and boundedness problems in positive characteristic, including a result ensuring that boundedness is invariant under normalizations, a canonical bundle formula for fibrations of Fano type which is easier to use, and the effective birationality of certain weak Fano varieties with good singularities, which is predicted by the BAB conjecture.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Positivity of the Moduli Part

    Florin Ambro , Paolo Cascini , Vyacheslav Shokurov , and Calum Spicer . Positivity of the Moduli Part . arXiv e-prints , page arXiv:2111.00423, October 2021

  2. [2]

    Boundedness and K^2 for log surfaces

    Valery Alexeev. Boundedness and K^2 for log surfaces . International Journal of Mathematics , 05(06):779--810, 1994

  3. [3]

    The moduli b-divisor of an lc-trivial fibration

    Florin Ambro. The moduli b-divisor of an lc-trivial fibration . Compositio Mathematica , 141(2):385–403, 2005

  4. [4]

    Singular toric Fano varieties

    Alexandr Borisov and Lev Borisov. Singular toric Fano varieties . Sbornik Mathematics , 75:277--283, 1993

  5. [5]

    Existence of M inimal M odels for V arieties of L og G eneral T ype

    Caucher Birkar, Paolo Cascini, Christopher Hacon, and James McKernan. Existence of M inimal M odels for V arieties of L og G eneral T ype. Journal of the American Mathematical Society , 23, 11 2010

  6. [6]

    Étale Fundamental Groups of Strongly F-Regular Schemes

    Bhargav Bhatt, Javier Carvajal-Rojas, Patrick Graf, Karl Schwede, and Kevin Tucker. Étale Fundamental Groups of Strongly F-Regular Schemes . International Mathematics Research Notices , 2019(14):4325–4339, October 2017

  7. [7]

    On the canonical bundle formula in positive characteristic

    Marta Benozzo . On the canonical bundle formula in positive characteristic . arXiv e-prints , page arXiv:2305.19841, May 2023

  8. [8]

    Existence of flips and minimal models for 3-folds in char p

    Caucher Birkar . Existence of flips and minimal models for 3-folds in char p . arXiv e-prints , page arXiv:1311.3098, November 2016

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    Anti-pluricanonical systems on Fano varieties

    Caucher Birkar. Anti-pluricanonical systems on Fano varieties . Annals of Mathematics , 190(2):345 -- 463, 2019

  2. [10]

    Singularities of linear systems and boundedness of F ano varieties

    Caucher Birkar. Singularities of linear systems and boundedness of F ano varieties. Annals of Mathematics , 2021

  3. [11]

    Bounding geometrically integral del Pezzo surfaces

    Fabio Bernasconi and Gebhard Martin. Bounding geometrically integral del Pezzo surfaces . Forum of Mathematics, Sigma , 12:e81, 2024

  4. [12]

    F-singularities via alterations

    Manuel Blickle , Karl Schwede , and Kevin Tucker . F-singularities via alterations . arXiv e-prints , page arXiv:1107.3807, July 2011

  5. [13]

    Existence of Mori fibre spaces for 3-folds in char p

    Caucher Birkar and Joe Waldron. Existence of Mori fibre spaces for 3-folds in char p . Advances in Mathematics , 313:62--101, June 2017. Publisher Copyright: 2017

  6. [14]

    Minimal model program for algebraically integrable foliations and generalized pairs

    Guodu Chen , Jingjun Han , Jihao Liu , and Lingyao Xie . Minimal model program for algebraically integrable foliations and generalized pairs . arXiv e-prints , page arXiv:2309.15823, September 2023

  7. [15]

    Resolution of singularities of threefolds in positive characteristic

    Vincent Cossart and Olivier Piltant. Resolution of singularities of threefolds in positive characteristic. I.: Reduction to local uniformization on Artin–Schreier and purely inseparable coverings . Journal of Algebra , 320:1051--1082, 2008

  8. [16]

    Resolution of singularities of threefolds in positive characteristic

    Vincent Cossart and Olivier Piltant. Resolution of singularities of threefolds in positive characteristic. II. Journal of Algebra , 321:1836--1976, 2009

  9. [17]

    Resolution of Singularities

    Steven Dale Cutkosky. Resolution of Singularities . 2004

  10. [18]

    On the Boundedness of Anti-Canonical Volumes of Singular Fano3-Folds in Characteristic p> 5

    Omprokash Das. On the Boundedness of Anti-Canonical Volumes of Singular Fano3-Folds in Characteristic p> 5 . International Mathematics Research Notices , 2021(9):6848–6870, March 2019

  11. [19]

    Omprokash Das and Christopher D. Hacon. On the adjunction formula for 3-folds in characteristic p>5 . Mathematische Zeitschrift , 284(1–2):255–269, April 2016

  12. [20]

    On semi-ampleness of the moduli part, 12 2022

    Stefano Filipazzi and Calum Spicer. On semi-ampleness of the moduli part, 12 2022

  13. [21]

    \'El\'ements de g\'eom\'etrie alg\'ebrique : IV

    Alexander Grothendieck. \'El\'ements de g\'eom\'etrie alg\'ebrique : IV. \'Etude locale des sch\'emas et des morphismes de sch\'emas, Quatri\`eme partie . Publications Math\'ematiques de l'IH\'ES , 32:5--361, 1967

  14. [22]

    Hacon, James McKernan, and Chenyang Xu

    Christopher D. Hacon, James McKernan, and Chenyang Xu. On the birational automorphisms of varieties of general type. Annals of Mathematics , 177:1077--1111, 2013

  15. [23]

    Hacon, James McKernan, and Chenyang Xu

    Christopher D. Hacon, James McKernan, and Chenyang Xu. ACC for log canonical thresholds. Annals of Mathematics , 180:523--571, 2014

  16. [24]

    Foundations of tight closure theory, 2022

    Mel Hotchster. Foundations of tight closure theory, 2022

  17. [25]

    F-regular and F-pure rings vs

    Nobuo Hara and Keiichi Watanabe. F-regular and F-pure rings vs. log terminal and log canonical singularities . Journal of Algebraic Geometry , 11:363--392, 2000

  18. [26]

    Hacon and Chenyang Xu

    Christopher D. Hacon and Chenyang Xu. On the three dimensional minimal model program in positive characteristic. Journal of the American Mathematical Society , 28(3):711--744, July 2015

  19. [27]

    On generalized lc pairs with b -log abundant nef part

    Junpeng Jiao , Jihao Liu , and Lingyao Xie . On generalized lc pairs with b -log abundant nef part . arXiv e-prints , page arXiv:2202.11256, February 2022

  20. [28]

    Subadjunction of log canonical divisors, ii

    Yūjirō Kawamata. Subadjunction of log canonical divisors, ii. American Journal of Mathematics , 120:893 -- 899, 1998

  21. [29]

    Characterizations of Regular Local Rings of Characteristic p

    Ernst Kunz. Characterizations of Regular Local Rings of Characteristic p . American Journal of Mathematics , 91(3):772--784, 1969

  22. [30]

    F-singularities in families

    Zsolt Patakfalvi , Karl Schwede , and Wenliang Zhang . F-singularities in families . arXiv e-prints , page arXiv:1305.1646, May 2013

  23. [31]

    Singularities of general fibers and the LMMP

    Zsolt Patakfalvi and Joe Waldron. Singularities of general fibers and the LMMP . American Journal of Mathematics , 144:505 -- 540, 2017

  24. [32]

    Boundedness of weak Fano threefolds with fixed Gorenstein index in positive characteristic

    Kenta Sato . Boundedness of weak Fano threefolds with fixed Gorenstein index in positive characteristic . arXiv e-prints , page arXiv:2403.02596, March 2024

  25. [33]

    Centers of F-purity

    Karl Schwede. Centers of F-purity . Mathematische Zeitschrift , 265:687--714, 2008

  26. [34]

    F-adjunction

    Karl Schwede. F-adjunction . Algebra and Number Theory , 3(8):907 -- 950, 2009

  27. [35]

    General hyperplane sections of threefolds in positive characteristic

    Kenta Sato and Shunsuke Takagi. General hyperplane sections of threefolds in positive characteristic . Journal of the Institute of Mathematics of Jussieu , 19(2):647–661, 2020

  28. [36]

    Bertini theorems for F-singularities

    Karl Schwede and Wenliang Zhang. Bertini theorems for F-singularities . Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society , 107(4):851–874, March 2013

  29. [37]

    Semiample perturbations for log canonical varieties over an F-finite field containing an infinite perfect field

    Hiromu Tanaka. Semiample perturbations for log canonical varieties over an F-finite field containing an infinite perfect field . International Journal of Mathematics , 28(05):1750030, 2017

  30. [38]

    On the characterization of abelian varieties for log pairs in zero and positive characteristic

    Yuan Wang. On the characterization of abelian varieties for log pairs in zero and positive characteristic . Annales de l'Institut Fourier , 72(6):2515--2539, 2022

  31. [39]

    On the canonical bundle formula and log abundance in positive characteristic

    Jakub Witaszek. On the canonical bundle formula and log abundance in positive characteristic. Mathematische Annalen , 381:1309 -- 1344, 2017

  32. [40]

    Fano varieties with large Seshadri constants

    Ziquan Zhuang. Fano varieties with large Seshadri constants . Advances in Mathematics , 340:883--913, 2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.