Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 2 cited by

Asymptotic Freedom in Parton Language: the Birth of Perturbative QCD

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A review argues that the 1977 Altarelli–Parisi paper was a proof of QCD factorization, not just a re-derivation.

desk verdict Useful historical survey of Parisi's pQCD contributions, but the claim that AP 1977 was a rigorous proof of QCD factorization is overstated. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.13158 v2 pith:A3Y7YNNW submitted 2025-01-22 hep-ph hep-thphysics.hist-ph

Stefano Forte This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-phhep-thphysics.hist-ph
keywords perturbativeQCDAltarelli-Parisiequationspartonmodeldeepinelasticscatteringfactorizationasymptoticfreedomscalingviolationshistoryofphysics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review reconstructs Giorgio Parisi's decade of short papers in strong-interaction theory and argues that they mark the transition from a loose parton model to perturbative QCD. Its central claim is that the 1977 Altarelli–Parisi paper should be read not as a convenient re-derivation of earlier results but as a rigorous proof of QCD factorization for deep-inelastic scattering. The author traces the chain of insights that made this possible: scaling laws for moments of structure functions are equivalent, by the Mellin convolution theorem, to evolution equations for the structure functions themselves, and those equations acquire physical meaning as parton splitting. A sympathetic reader would care because this changes the historical status of the parton model: it becomes a consequence of quantum field theory rather than a phenomenological assumption.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Mellin-transform duality between moment scaling laws and $x$-space evolution: if a moment of a structure function scales as $(Q^2/\Lambda^2)^{-\gamma_N}$, then the structure function itself obeys an integro-differential equation with kernel $P(z)$ such that $\gamma_N=\int_0^1 dx\,x^{N-1}P(x)$. This duality lets the author read Parisi's terse 1973–1974 papers as already containing the Altarelli–Parisi equation. It is supplemented by the Weizsäcker–Williams approximation, which gives the universal collinear-splitting probabilities that become the splitting functions, and by time-ordered perturbation theory, which is used in the 1977 paper to compute those splitting functions. Together these pieces carry the claim that parton language is not a model but a reformulation of renormalization-group evolution.

What would settle it

A direct check of the original 1973 letter (Phys. Lett. B43, 207) would settle the priority claim: if it contains no kernel $P(z)$ and no statement that moment scaling implies a local evolution equation for $F_2(x,Q^2)$, then the reconstruction in the review's Eq. (4) is anachronistic and the central historical claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's core discovery, presented as a historical reconstruction, is that Parisi had already put in place every ingredient of the Altarelli–Parisi equations before the celebrated 1977 paper. In 1973, in a paper concerned with experimental limits on anomalous dimensions, Parisi noted that the Mellin convolution theorem turns a power-law scaling law for moments of the structure function $F_2(x,Q^2)$ into a local integro-differential scaling law for $F_2$ itself, with a kernel $P(x/y)$ that is the Mellin inverse of the anomalous dimension; in 1974 he combined this with Gross–Wilczek anomalous dimensions to write an explicit evolution equation for the proton–neutron difference of structure functions. The 1976 Moriond lectures then interpreted this evolution as radiation: the probed particle showers into constituents, with rates governed by the Weizsäcker–Williams approximation, and asymptotic freedom is the anti-screening that makes the coupling vanish at short distances. According to the review, the Altarelli–Parisi paper completes the program by computing the splitting functions $P_{ij}(z)$ in time-ordered perturbation theory and writing coupled evolution equations for quark and gluon distributions; this parton-language computation is mathematically equivalent to the Wilson-expansion and renormalization-group derivation, so the paper amounts to a rigorous proof of QCD factorization for deep-inelastic scattering.

Load-bearing premise

The account assumes that Parisi's two- and three-page papers, written before QCD was accepted, can be read as already containing the modern results the review attributes to them—above all, that the 1973 side-remark is the Altarelli–Parisi equation in germ.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The parton-model description of deep-inelastic scattering is put on a field-theoretic footing: structure functions computed from parton distributions satisfy the same renormalization-group equations as Wilson-coefficient computations.
  • The Altarelli–Parisi equations become the basis of parton-distribution evolution and of the parton-shower picture used in modern Monte Carlo event generators.
  • Parisi's 1974 evolution equation and the 1977 paper imply that scaling violations are universal: the same splitting functions control quark and gluon densities, polarized distributions, and, as shown later in the decade, fragmentation functions.
  • Parisi's short papers set the agenda for QCD phenomenology: the Drell–Yan transverse-momentum computation and its soft-gluon resummation anticipate the Collins–Soper–Sterman framework, and the threshold resummation of 1980 was only extended to next-to-leading logarithmic accuracy about a decade later.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the review's reading is right, the standard textbook history—which credits Gribov and Lipatov with the evolution equations and treats Altarelli–Parisi as an independent re-derivation—understates what the 1977 paper proved; the priority question then turns on how literally one reads Parisi's terse 1973 side-remark.
  • The claim that the Altarelli–Parisi paper is a rigorous proof of QCD factorization is stronger than anything the 1977 paper itself states; a skeptical check would ask whether the equivalence to the Wilson-expansion argument extends beyond leading twist and leading logarithmic accuracy, and whether factorization in the modern all-orders sense is really established there.
  • A testable extension of the review's method would be to track the same kernel-based duality in the Gribov–Lipatov paper and ask whether Parisi's physical picture of showering, absent there, is the genuinely novel element that makes the 1977 paper foundational.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper is a historical review of Giorgio Parisi's contributions to perturbative QCD, focused on the decade 1970–1980. It traces three overlapping epochs: the struggle to understand Bjorken scaling and the parton model, the emergence of scaling violations and the Altarelli–Parisi equations, and the foundational work in QCD phenomenology such as transverse-momentum resummation, threshold resummation, and energy-correlation observables. The central claim, stated in Section 3, is that the 1977 Altarelli–Parisi paper 'amounts to, a rigorous proof of QCD factorization, albeit in the limited case of deep-inelastic scattering.' The review also argues that several of Parisi's short papers anticipated results that only became prominent much later, including insights into transverse-momentum-dependent distributions and threshold resummation.

Significance. The paper offers a valuable insider perspective on a formative period of QCD, with a coherent chronology and a useful catalogue of Parisi's early papers. Its principal strength is the attempt to connect technical results across a decade of short publications, and it is candid about the author's position as a participant-observer rather than a professional historian. However, the paper's most distinctive claim—that Altarelli–Parisi 1977 constitutes a rigorous proof of factorization—is not supported by the evidence presented, and several priority claims are asserted rather than documented. If the main claims are revised to match what the quoted sources actually show, the paper remains a helpful retrospective for a Festschrift volume, but its current significance depends on an overstatement.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3, paragraph after Eqs. (7)–(8)] The statement that the Altarelli–Parisi paper 'amounts to, a rigorous proof of QCD factorization' is not supported by the derivation summarized in the review. The account given here shows that AP computed leading-order splitting functions in time-ordered perturbation theory and then noted a connection to renormalization-group equations; that establishes a leading-order, leading-twist equivalence with the Wilson-expansion/RG treatment, not a general factorization theorem. A rigorous proof of factorization would require all-orders control of collinear and soft singularities, treatment of power corrections, and a demonstration that hard and soft contributions factorize beyond the leading logarithms. Please replace 'rigorous proof of QCD factorization' with a more defensible formulation such as 'a leading-order, leading-twist derivation in parton language' or provide explicit evidence from the AP paper that it states and proves a factorization theorem beyond leading order. This is load-bearing because the paper's conclusion that AP was the first field-theoretic justification of the parton model rests on this wording.
  2. [Section 4, paragraph on Ref. [42]] The claim that the two-page paper Ref. [42] already contained the 'kinematic origin of the different behavior of the DY and DIS cases' is supported only by a reference to Ref. [48], which is the author's own later paper. This is not independent evidence of what Parisi stated or understood in 1980. Without a direct quotation or careful paraphrase of the relevant passage from Ref. [42], or corroboration from a contemporaneous source, the assertion should be labeled as a retrospective reconstruction. Since the abstract's general thesis that Parisi 'anticipated results that only became prominent in the XXIst century' rests on such attributions, this issue is load-bearing and should be addressed explicitly.
  3. [Section 3, Eq. (4) and surrounding discussion] The discussion of Ref. [21] states that Eq. (4), presented as a 'casual side-remark,' 'effectively contains the basic physics of the Altarelli-Parisi equation.' This is an anachronistic attribution unless the original wording of Ref. [21] is quoted and shown to contain more than the mathematical Mellin-transform observation. The historical priority claim depends on the distinction between a mathematical formula that later acquired a physical interpretation and an explicit physical statement in the 1973 paper. The review should either quote the exact passage from Ref. [21] or explicitly describe Eq. (4) as an after-the-fact reinterpretation.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 1, first paragraph] The phrase 'the first paper [1] was published in 1970' is ambiguous because Section 2 later calls Ref. [8] 'his third published paper on record'; please clarify whether [1] is the first of the decade's QCD-related papers or the first paper of Parisi's career.
  2. [Section 3, Eq. (4)] The symbol α in Eq. (4) is described as a normalization, while later equations use α_s for the coupling; define this symbol explicitly at first use to avoid confusion about its physical status.
  3. [Acknowledgments and disclaimer] The disclaimer that the author is not a historian is honest and welcome, but it should be reflected in the main text by more frequently flagging interpretive reconstructions as such, particularly when the original papers are not quoted verbatim.
  4. [References] Several references are listed only as 'Contribution to this volume' without titles; providing short titles would make the bibliography more useful to readers unfamiliar with the planned Festschrift.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: this historical review makes interpretive claims about past papers rather than deriving predictions from fitted inputs.

full rationale

This is a historical review of Parisi's QCD papers, not a derivation paper, so the patterns of self-definition, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, and ansatz smuggling do not apply. The strongest claim, that the Altarelli-Parisi paper 'amounts to, a rigorous proof of QCD factorization, albeit in the limited case of deep-inelastic scattering' (Section 3), is an interpretation supported by the review's account of the mathematical equivalence between parton evolution equations and the Wilson-expansion/RG treatment, plus a terse comment in the AP conclusion. That evidence may be thin for the word 'rigorous', but the review does not define the result in terms of its own conclusion or fit a parameter and then call it a prediction, so any overreach is a correctness or historiography concern, not circularity. The only self-referential element is the citation to the author's own Ref. [48] to supply a detailed proof for a kinematic insight attributed to Parisi's Ref. [42] ('proven in detail in Ref. [48]'); this supports a side claim, and Ref. [48] is an independent later derivation, so it does not make the central historical claim circular. The author's disclaimer that he is 'not a historian' and did not witness the work is a stated limitation, not a circular step. The internal mathematical chain displayed in Eqs. (3)-(6), namely the Mellin-transform equivalence between moment scaling laws and x-space evolution equations, is a direct transformation and is not circularly defined.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review introduces no new free parameters or invented entities. Its claims depend on historical interpretation of cited papers and standard mathematics such as Mellin convolution, the Wilson expansion, and the Weizsacker-Williams approximation. The main epistemic load is carried by assumptions about how to read short retrospective papers, which the author himself flags as uncertain.

assumptions (3)
  • standard math The convolution theorem for Mellin transforms justifies converting moment scaling laws (Eq. 3) into evolution equations (Eq. 4).
    Used in Section 3 to present Parisi's 1973 insight; this is a standard result and the equations are internally consistent.
  • domain assumption The Weizsacker-Williams approximation gives the universal collinear splitting probability needed to derive the Altarelli-Parisi equations.
    Invoked in Section 3 for Refs. [17], [28] and [7]; its validity in the collinear limit is the physical basis of the splitting-function picture.
  • domain assumption Parisi's short papers and unpublished lectures can be interpreted as containing the modern QCD concepts the review attributes to them.
    This is the load-bearing historical premise, acknowledged in the disclaimer; it cannot be checked from the review alone.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Asymptotic Freedom in Parton Language: the Birth of Perturbative QCD." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/A3Y7YNNW

@misc{pith2026250113158,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Asymptotic Freedom in Parton Language: the Birth of Perturbative QCD},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/A3Y7YNNW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.13158}
}
read the original abstract

I review the contributions of Giorgio Parisi to perturbative QCD. Concentrated in a decade, they mark the transition of the theory of strong interactions from a set of loosely connected ideas based on models, to a quantum field theory that is now an integral part of the standard model of fundamental interactions. Parisi's contributions have established at a very early stage ideas, methods and tools that are now standard, and in several cases anticipated results that only became prominent in the XXIst century.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. From Bjorken Scaling to Scaling Violations

    physics.hist-ph 2025-06 accept novelty 3.0 of 10

    A physicist's insider history of how Bjorken scaling, parton models, and asymptotic freedom led to QCD and the Altarelli-Parisi evolution equations.

  2. The Rise of Particle Physics

    hep-ph 2025-07 unverdicted novelty 1.0 of 10

    A proceedings volume of historical reviews and personal recollections, not a new research result, marking the 50th anniversary of the J/psi discovery and the rise of the Standard Model.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [42]

    Parisi, Summing Large Perturbative Corrections in QCD , Phys

    G. Parisi, Summing Large Perturbative Corrections in QCD , Phys. Lett. B 90 (1980) 295–296

    work page 1980

  2. [48]

    Forte and G

    S. Forte and G. Ridolfi, Renormalization group approach to soft gluon resummation, Nucl. Phys. B 650 (2003) 229–270, [ hep-ph/0209154]

    arXiv 2003

  3. [21]

    Parisi, Experimental limits on the values of anomalous dimensions , Phys

    G. Parisi, Experimental limits on the values of anomalous dimensions , Phys. Lett. B 43 (1973) 207–208

    work page 1973

  4. [1]

    Cabibbo, G

    N. Cabibbo, G. Parisi, M. Testa, and A. Verganelakis, Deep-inelastic scattering and the nature of partons , Lett. Nuovo Cim. 4S1 (1970) 569–574

    work page 1970

  5. [2]

    Martinelli and G

    G. Martinelli and G. Parisi, Testable QCD predictions for sphericity-like distributions in e+e− annihilation, Phys. Lett. B 89 (1980) 391–393. 13

    work page 1980

  6. [3]

    Coleman, Aspects of Symmetry: Selected Erice Lectures

    S. Coleman, Aspects of Symmetry: Selected Erice Lectures . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K., 1985

    1985

  7. [4]

    Maiani, Contribution to this volume ,

    L. Maiani, Contribution to this volume ,

    work page

  8. [5]

    M. P. Lombardo, Contribution to this volume ,

    work page

Show all 58 references
  1. [6]

    Martinelli, Contribution to this volume ,

    G. Martinelli, Contribution to this volume ,

  2. [7]

    Altarelli and G

    G. Altarelli and G. Parisi, Asymptotic Freedom in Parton Language , Nucl. Phys. B 126 (1977) 298–318

    1977

  3. [8]

    Cabibbo, G

    N. Cabibbo, G. Parisi, and M. Testa, Hadron Production in e+ e- Collisions, Lett. Nuovo Cim. 4S1 (1970) 35–39

    1970

  4. [9]

    M. E. Peskin and D. V. Schroeder, An Introduction to quantum field theory. Addison-Wesley, Reading, USA, 1995

    1995

  5. [10]

    R. K. Ellis, W. J. Stirling, and B. R. Webber, QCD and collider physics, vol. 8. Cambridge University Press, 2, 2011

    2011

  6. [11]

    S. D. Drell, D. J. Levy, and T.-M. Yan, A Field Theoretic Model for electron-Nucleon Deep-Inelastic Scattering, Phys. Rev. Lett. 22 (1969) 744–748

    1969

  7. [12]

    Parisi, A duality sum rule for deep inelastic scattering , Lett

    G. Parisi, A duality sum rule for deep inelastic scattering , Lett. Nuovo Cim. 3S2 (1972) 395–396

    1972

  8. [13]

    R. G. Roberts, The Structure of the proton: Deep-inelastic scattering . Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 2, 1994

    1994

  9. [14]

    Gottfried, Sum rule for high-energy electron - proton scattering , Phys

    K. Gottfried, Sum rule for high-energy electron - proton scattering , Phys. Rev. Lett. 18 (1967) 1174

    1967

  10. [15]

    A. D. Martin, W. J. Stirling, and R. G. Roberts, Parton distributions, the Gottfried sum rule and the W charge asymmetry , Phys. Lett. B 252 (1990) 653–656

    1990

  11. [16]

    Parisi, Bjorken scaling and the parton model , Phys

    G. Parisi, Bjorken scaling and the parton model , Phys. Lett. B 42 (1972) 114–116

    1972

  12. [17]

    Parisi and F

    G. Parisi and F. Zirilli, Hard bremsstrahlung in e+ e- collisions , Lett. Nuovo Cim. 2S2 (1971) 395–396. 14

    1971

  13. [18]

    Parisi and F

    G. Parisi and F. Zirilli, Angular correlations of the decay products of two heavy leptons , Lett. Nuovo Cim. 2S2 (1971) 775–776

    1971

  14. [19]

    Parisi and F

    G. Parisi and F. Zirilli, A simple method for computing electrodynamic processes of high order , Nuovo Cim. A 11 (1972) 37–44

    1972

  15. [20]

    M. L. Mangano and S. J. Parke, Multiparton amplitudes in gauge theories, Phys. Rept. 200 (1991) 301–367, [ hep-th/0509223]

    1991 arXiv

  16. [22]

    Parisi, How to measure the dimension of the parton field , Nucl

    G. Parisi, How to measure the dimension of the parton field , Nucl. Phys. B 59 (1973) 641–646

    1973

  17. [23]

    Gross et al., 50 Years of Quantum Chromodynamics , Eur

    F. Gross et al., 50 Years of Quantum Chromodynamics , Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023) 1125, [ arXiv:2212.11107]

    2023 arXiv

  18. [24]

    Parisi, Detailed Predictions for the p − n Structure Functions in Theories with Computable Large Momenta Behavior , Phys

    G. Parisi, Detailed Predictions for the p − n Structure Functions in Theories with Computable Large Momenta Behavior , Phys. Lett. B 50 (1974) 367–368

    1974

  19. [25]

    D. J. Gross and F. Wilczek, Asymptotically Free Gauge Theories. 2. , Phys. Rev. D 9 (1974) 980–993

    1974

  20. [26]

    Altarelli, G

    G. Altarelli, G. Parisi, and R. Petronzio, Charmed Quarks and Asypmtotic Freedom in Neutrino Scattering , Phys. Lett. B 63 (1976) 183–187

    1976

  21. [27]

    Parisi and R

    G. Parisi and R. Petronzio, On the Breaking of Bjorken Scaling , Phys. Lett. B 62 (1976) 331–334

    1976

  22. [28]

    Parisi, An Introduction to Scaling Violations , in 11th Rencontres de Moriond: weak interactions and neutrino physics , pp

    G. Parisi, An Introduction to Scaling Violations , in 11th Rencontres de Moriond: weak interactions and neutrino physics , pp. 83–114, 4, 1976

    1976

  23. [29]

    J. M. Campbell et al., Event generators for high-energy physics experiments, SciPost Phys. 16 (2024), no. 5 130, [ arXiv:2203.11110]

    2024 arXiv

  24. [30]

    V. N. Gribov and L. N. Lipatov, Deep-inelasticep scattering in perturbation theory, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 15 (1972) 438–450

    1972

  25. [31]

    J. B. Kogut and L. Susskind, Scale invariant parton model , Phys. Rev. D 9 (1974) 697–705

    1974

  26. [32]

    G. F. Sterman, An Introduction to quantum field theory . Cambridge University Press, 8, 1993. 15

    1993

  27. [33]

    Borinsky, Z

    M. Borinsky, Z. Capatti, E. Laenen, and A. Salas-Bern´ ardez , Flow-oriented perturbation theory, JHEP 01 (2023) 172, [arXiv:2210.05532]

    2023 arXiv

  28. [34]

    Collins, Foundations of Perturbative QCD , vol

    J. Collins, Foundations of Perturbative QCD , vol. 32 of Cambridge Monographs on Particle Physics, Nuclear Physics and Cosmol ogy. Cambridge University Press, 7, 2023

    2023

  29. [35]

    NNPDF Collaboration, R. D. Ball et al., The path to proton structure at 1% accuracy , Eur. Phys. J. C 82 (2022), no. 5 428, [arXiv:2109.02653]

    2022 arXiv

  30. [36]

    Altarelli, G

    G. Altarelli, G. Parisi, and R. Petronzio, Transverse Momentum in Drell-Yan Processes, Phys. Lett. B 76 (1978) 351–355

    1978

  31. [37]

    Altarelli, G

    G. Altarelli, G. Parisi, and R. Petronzio, Transverse Momentum of Muon Pairs Produced in Hadronic Collisions , Phys. Lett. B 76 (1978) 356–360

    1978

  32. [38]

    Parisi, Super Inclusive Cross-Sections , Phys

    G. Parisi, Super Inclusive Cross-Sections , Phys. Lett. B 74 (1978) 65–67

    1978

  33. [39]

    Parisi and N

    G. Parisi and N. Sourlas, A Simple Parametrization of the Q2 Dependence of the Quark Distributions in QCD , Nucl. Phys. B 151 (1979) 421–428

    1979

  34. [40]

    Parisi and R

    G. Parisi and R. Petronzio, Gluon fragmentation functions from quark jets, Phys. Lett. B 82 (1979) 260–262

    1979

  35. [41]

    Parisi and R

    G. Parisi and R. Petronzio, Small Transverse Momentum Distributions in Hard Processes , Nucl. Phys. B 154 (1979) 427–440

    1979

  36. [43]

    J. C. Collins, D. E. Soper, and G. F. Sterman, Transverse Momentum Distribution in Drell-Yan Pair and W and Z Boson Production , Nucl. Phys. B 250 (1985) 199–224

    1985

  37. [44]

    Angeles-Martinez et al., Transverse Momentum Dependent (TMD) parton distribution functions: status and prospects , Acta Phys

    R. Angeles-Martinez et al., Transverse Momentum Dependent (TMD) parton distribution functions: status and prospects , Acta Phys. Polon. B 46 (2015), no. 12 2501–2534, [ arXiv:1507.05267]. 16

    2015 arXiv

  38. [45]

    Altarelli, R

    G. Altarelli, R. K. Ellis, and G. Martinelli, Large Perturbative Corrections to the Drell-Yan Process in QCD , Nucl. Phys. B 157 (1979) 461–497

    1979

  39. [46]

    G. F. Sterman, Summation of Large Corrections to Short Distance Hadronic Cross-Sections, Nucl. Phys. B 281 (1987) 310–364

    1987

  40. [47]

    Catani and L

    S. Catani and L. Trentadue, Resummation of the QCD Perturbative Series for Hard Processes , Nucl. Phys. B 327 (1989) 323–352

    1989

  41. [49]

    Contopanagos, E

    H. Contopanagos, E. Laenen, and G. F. Sterman, Sudakov factorization and resummation , Nucl. Phys. B 484 (1997) 303–330, [hep-ph/9604313]

    1997 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Magnea and G

    L. Magnea and G. F. Sterman, Analytic continuation of the Sudakov form-factor in QCD , Phys. Rev. D 42 (1990) 4222–4227

    1990

  43. [51]

    Ahrens, T

    V. Ahrens, T. Becher, M. Neubert, and L. L. Yang, Origin of the Large Perturbative Corrections to Higgs Production at Hadron Col liders, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 033013, [ arXiv:0808.3008]

    2009 arXiv

  44. [52]

    A. D. Martin, A. J. T. M. Mathijssen, W. J. Stirling, R. S. Thorne , B. J. A. Watt, and G. Watt, Extended Parameterisations for MSTW PDFs and their effect on Lepton Charge Asymmetry from W Decays , Eur. Phys. J. C 73 (2013), no. 2 2318, [ arXiv:1211.1215]

    2013 arXiv

  45. [53]

    A. Gao, H. T. Li, I. Moult, and H. X. Zhu, The transverse energy-energy correlator at next-to-next-to-next-to-le ading logarithm, JHEP 09 (2024) 072, [ arXiv:2312.16408]

    2024 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Bonino, T

    L. Bonino, T. Gehrmann, M. Marcoli, R. Sch¨ urmann, and G. Stagnitto, Antenna subtraction for processes with identified particle s at hadron colliders , JHEP 08 (2024) 073, [ arXiv:2406.09925]

    2024 arXiv

  47. [55]

    J. F. Owens, On the Q**2 Dependence of Parton Fragmentation Functions, Phys. Lett. B 76 (1978) 85–88

    1978

  48. [56]

    Br´ ezin,Contribution to this volume ,

    E. Br´ ezin,Contribution to this volume ,

  49. [57]

    Vulpiani, Contribution to this volume ,

    A. Vulpiani, Contribution to this volume ,

  50. [58]

    Rychkov, Contribution to this volume ,

    S. Rychkov, Contribution to this volume , . 17

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.