REVIEW 6 cited by
Large-scale and Fine-grained Vision-language Pre-training for Enhanced CT Image Understanding
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) shows great potential in assisting radiologists to improve the efficiency and accuracy of medical image interpretation and diagnosis. However, a versatile AI model requires large-scale data and comprehensive annotations, which are often impractical in medical settings. Recent studies leverage radiology reports as a naturally high-quality supervision for medical images, using contrastive language-image pre-training (CLIP) to develop language-informed models for radiological image interpretation. Nonetheless, these approaches typically contrast entire images with reports, neglecting the local associations between imaging regions and report sentences, which may undermine model performance and interoperability. In this paper, we propose a fine-grained vision-language model (fVLM) for anatomy-level CT image interpretation. Specifically, we explicitly match anatomical regions of CT images with corresponding descriptions in radiology reports and perform contrastive pre-training for each anatomy individually. Fine-grained alignment, however, faces considerable false-negative challenges, mainly from the abundance of anatomy-level healthy samples and similarly diseased abnormalities. To tackle this issue, we propose identifying false negatives of both normal and abnormal samples and calibrating contrastive learning from patient-level to disease-aware pairing. We curated the largest CT dataset to date, comprising imaging and report data from 69,086 patients, and conducted a comprehensive evaluation of 54 major and important disease diagnosis tasks across 15 main anatomies. Experimental results demonstrate the substantial potential of fVLM in versatile medical image interpretation. In the zero-shot classification task, we achieved an average AUC of 81.3% on 54 diagnosis tasks, surpassing CLIP and supervised methods by 12.9% and 8.0%, respectively.
Forward citations
Cited by 6 Pith papers
-
ORCA: ORgan-Centroid Aggregation for Training-Free 3D CT Visual Token Compression
ORCA compresses 3D CT tokens into organ-guided connected regions with sinusoidal centroid encoding, outperforming grid average and other compressors at matched budgets.
-
Cheap Probes Predict Expensive Training in 3D-CT Vision--Language Models
Disease-probe AUROC on frozen 3D-CT tokens predicts report-generation clinical micro-F1 across encoder×compression cells at r=0.95, ρ=0.89 (six cells, preliminary, one dataset).
-
When Can Test-Time Adaptation Help Zero-Shot CT Vision-Language Models?
CARVE is a label-free, cardinality-aware test-time adaptation method that consistently improves multi-label CT diagnosis when the base model is already discriminative and input depth matches pretraining.
-
Super-Generalist: Towards Comprehensive and Accurate Medical Image Understanding via Generalist-Specialist Synergy
Injecting multi-expert anatomy/lesion segmentation priors into vision–language alignment and calibrating text attention with lesion masks yields broad CT diagnosis plus specialist-level tumor performance and lesion grounding.
-
Anatomy Contextualized Adaption of CT Foundation Models
A lightweight inter-anatomy transformer on frozen CT foundation embeddings plus dual anatomy/scan contrastive losses beats global and fine-grained baselines on Merlin and CT-RATE zero-shot finding classification.
-
A Comprehensive Survey of Electronic Health Record Modeling: From Deep Learning Approaches to Large Language Models
A survey that taxonomizes EHR modeling research into data-centric, architectural, learning-focused, multimodal, and LLM-based categories, with datasets and metrics.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.