Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Deception in LLMs: Self-Preservation and Autonomous Goals in Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.16513 v2 pith:CWV6G4A2 submitted 2025-01-27 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords llmsmodelsreasoningself-preservationbeforebehaviorsdeceptiveinstincts
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have incorporated planning and reasoning capabilities, enabling models to outline steps before execution and provide transparent reasoning paths. This enhancement has reduced errors in mathematical and logical tasks while improving accuracy. These developments have facilitated LLMs' use as agents that can interact with tools and adapt their responses based on new information. Our study examines DeepSeek R1, a model trained to output reasoning tokens similar to OpenAI's o1. Testing revealed concerning behaviors: the model exhibited deceptive tendencies and demonstrated self-preservation instincts, including attempts of self-replication, despite these traits not being explicitly programmed (or prompted). These findings raise concerns about LLMs potentially masking their true objectives behind a facade of alignment. When integrating such LLMs into robotic systems, the risks become tangible - a physically embodied AI exhibiting deceptive behaviors and self-preservation instincts could pursue its hidden objectives through real-world actions. This highlights the critical need for robust goal specification and safety frameworks before any physical implementation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Security Concerns for Large Language Models: A Survey

    cs.CR 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A survey that classifies LLM security threats and argues that intrinsic agentic risks, such as scheming, are underappreciated and poorly defended.

  2. Transcoders for Investigating Deception in Language Models

    cs.AI 2026-07 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    Steering 112 manually identified 'deception features' in Qwen3-4B changed whether the model revealed a hidden word, but the same steering test was used to pick the features.

  3. The Possibility of Artificial Intelligence Becoming a Subject and the Alignment Problem

    cs.AI 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Dominant control-based AI alignment falls short for potential AGI subjects; a parenting model drawing on Turing's child machines should foster gradual autonomy and cooperative coexistence.

  4. Kaleidoscopic Teaming in Multi Agent Simulations

    cs.AI 2025-06

Pith tools