Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Entanglement Entropy and Cauchy-Hadamard Renormalization

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Conical singularities realize CFT twist-field correlation functions and yield the Calabrese-Cardy formula.

desk verdict Rigorous renormalization construction of twist-field ratios, but the main theorem's scaling dimension is misstated: (k-1)/k should be (k - 1/k). read the letter →

arxiv 2501.19014 v1 pith:XA6MYC2D submitted 2025-01-31 hep-th math-phmath.DGmath.MP

Benoit Estienne , Jiasheng Lin This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thmath-phmath.DGmath.MP MSC 81T4058J52
keywords entanglemententropyconformalfieldtheoryconicalsingularityPolyakovanomalyCauchy-HadamardrenormalizationtwistfieldsbranchedcoverRényi
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the twist-field correlation functions of two-dimensional conformal field theory can be seen as pure geometry: they are the response of partition functions on branched covers to conformal rescalings of the base metric. The authors define a renormalized partition function for metrics with isolated conical singularities by deleting small disks around the cone points and subtracting a logarithmic divergence in the Polyakov anomaly, in the spirit of Cauchy-Hadamard principal values. Their main theorem states that for a $d$-sheeted ramified cover, the ratio of the cover partition function to the $d$-th power of the base partition function scales under a Weyl factor $e^{2h}$ exactly like a product of primary fields located at the branch values, with weights given by the local ramification orders. A corollary recovers the Calabrese-Cardy formula for the Rényi entanglement entropy of an interval in the vacuum of a CFT on a circle. A careful reader should care because the proof uses only cone-point geometry and integration by parts, so the connection between entanglement entropy and conical singularities is made explicit rather than heuristic.

What carries the argument

The central object is the Cauchy-Hadamard renormalized Polyakov anomaly $RA_\Sigma(\tilde{g},g)$, defined by removing disks $B_\varepsilon(z_i,\tilde{g})$ of radius $\varepsilon$ measured in the singular metric and adding the counterterm $2\pi\sum_i \gamma_i^2(1+\gamma_i)^{-1}\log\varepsilon$ before taking $\varepsilon\to 0^+$. This makes $Z(\Sigma,\tilde{g})=\exp(c\,RA_\Sigma(\tilde{g},g))Z(\Sigma,g)$ independent of the reference metric (Lemma 5.1) and of the cut-off regularization (Lemma 5.3). The proof of the transformation law runs on the Troyanov local form $\tilde{g}=|w|^{2\gamma}e^{2\varphi}|dw|^2$ with the estimates $\varphi(z)=\varphi(z_0)+O(r^{2\gamma+2})$ and $\partial\varphi=O(r^{2\gamma+1})$; these control the dilation Lemma 4.2, the log-divergent integral asymptotics of Section 4.3, and the closed form of the anomaly in Lemma 6.2, which yields Proposition 6.1 and then Proposition 6.3.

What would settle it

A concrete check: for the Gaussian free field ($c=1$) on the sphere with $f(z)=z^d$, Fubini-Study metric $g$, and any smooth $h$, compute the left and right sides of (6.8) from the explicit zeta-determinant Polyakov formula. The two must be equal for every such $h$; a discrepancy that depends on $\nabla h$ or on subleading terms such as $\varphi(z)=O(r^{2\gamma+1}\log r)$ at the branch points would disprove the claim. The same computation would expose whether the coefficient of $\log\varepsilon$ in (2.25) remains $2\pi\gamma^2/(\gamma+1)$ for a potential violating (4.7).

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is Proposition 6.3. Let $f: \Sigma_d \to \Sigma$ be a ramified $d$-sheeted holomorphic map with critical values $w_j$, let $g$ be a smooth conformal metric on $\Sigma$, and let $h$ be smooth. With the renormalized partition functions of Definition 2.8, the identity $$\frac{Z(\Sigma_d, f^* $e^{{2h}}$g)}{Z(\Sigma, $e^{{2h}}$g)^d} = $e^{{-\sum_j h(w_j)\Delta_j}}$\, \frac{Z(\Sigma_d, f^*g)}{Z(\Sigma, g)^d}, \qquad \Delta_j = \frac{c}{12}\sum_{z\in $f^{{-1}}$(w_j)}\frac{\mathrm{ord}_f(z)-1}{\mathrm{ord}_f(z)}$$ holds. The claim is that a branch point of order $k$ contributes weight $c(1-1/k)/12$ per preimage, so the ratio transforms exactly like a correlation function of twist fields at the critical values. In the replica setting of a cyclic $d$-fold cover, Corollary 6.4 turns this into the Calabrese-Cardy formula $$\operatorname{tr}_{H_A}(\operatorname{tr}_{A^c}(\rho)^d) = C\left(\frac{L}{\pi}\sin\frac{\pi\ell}{L}\right)^{-c(d-1/d)/6}$$ for the $d$-th Rényi entropy of an interval of length $\ell$ in a CFT on a circle of length $L$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that every cone point admits a local metric of the form $|w|^{2\gamma}$ times a regular factor whose value and first derivatives approach their cone-point limits with the specific rates (4.7); the logarithmic counterterm coefficient $2\pi\gamma^2/(\gamma+1)$ and the conformal weights $\Delta_j$ are computed from those rates. Lemma 6.2, the closed-form anomaly formula that feeds Proposition 6.1, is stated without proof.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A conical point of exponent $\gamma$ behaves as a primary field of weight $\Delta=(c/12)\gamma(\gamma+2)/(\gamma+1)$ under smooth rescalings of the metric (Remark 6.1).
  • The ratio $Z(\Sigma_d,f^*g)/Z(\Sigma,g)^d$ is a diffeomorphism-invariant function of the critical values, so the object on the right of (6.8) has the symmetry required of a twist-field correlator (Remark 6.3).
  • The renormalized anomaly agrees with the cut-off method of [14], so Definition 2.8 introduces no extra boundary terms on the deleted disks (Lemma 5.3).
  • The Calabrese-Cardy formula (6.12) follows with the same constant $C$ as the two-point function on the sphere, not a new free constant (Corollary 6.4).
  • For a branch point of order $k$, each preimage contributes $c/12\,(1-1/k)$ to the twist-field weight; the standard cyclic $d$-fold cover, with two order-$d$ points, gives $\Delta=c(d-1/d)/12$ per point.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the same ratio identity should be testable in the Gaussian free field by building twist fields from the twisted Laplacians mentioned in the future-work discussion and comparing with explicit Green functions on the branched cover.
  • Beyond the paper, the method suggests that twist fields are emergent rather than fundamental: the branch point with its conical metric already carries the full operator content, so conformal weights and possibly OPE coefficients could be extracted by shrinking the deleted disks.
  • Beyond the paper, the boundary version of the anomaly should extend the result to intervals in systems with boundaries, producing boundary twist-field weights; the authors list this as future work, so a concrete target is to derive the corresponding Rényi entropy for a half-line or finite segment.
  • Beyond the paper, because the counterterm is quadratic in $\gamma$, the renormalized partition function is not captured by a delta-function curvature term alone; any numerical check of Proposition 6.3 should therefore measure the deleted disks with the singular metric itself, not the background metric.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper defines CFT partition functions on Riemann surfaces with conical singularities by a Cauchy-Hadamard renormalization of the Polyakov anomaly integral (Definitions 2.7–2.8). It proves a scaling lemma for the distance function at a cone point (Lemma 4.2), computes the logarithmic divergence of the Dirichlet energy (Corollary 4.7), and establishes a transformation law for ratios of partition functions on a branched cover against the base (Proposition 6.3). The main claim is that, for a d-sheeted holomorphic ramified map f:Σ_d→Σ, the ratio Z(Σ_d,f^*e^{2h}g)/Z(Σ,e^{2h}g)^d equals e^{-Σ_j h(w_j)Δ_j} times the corresponding ratio with g, with Δ_j determined by the ramification orders. The paper then derives the Calabrese-Cardy formula for the vacuum Rényi entropy of an interval (Corollary 6.4) and includes a pedagogical review of the replica trick (Section 3).

Significance. If the main result is read with the corrected conformal weights, the paper gives a rigorous, elementary geometric realization of twist-field correlation functions and a derivation of the Calabrese-Cardy formula from the Polyakov anomaly. Its strengths are the simple integration-by-parts method, the explicit renormalization independent of the reference metric (Lemma 5.1), the consistency check with cut-off regularization (Lemma 5.3), and the detailed comparison with prior ζ-determinant work of Kalvin and of Aldana–Kirsten–Rowlett. However, the printed statement of the main theorem contains an erroneous scaling dimension, and Lemma 6.2, which is used in the proof of Proposition 6.1, is stated without proof. These issues make the current version unsuitable for publication without revision.

major comments (2)
  1. [Sections 1 and 6.1, Eqs. (1.2) and (6.9)] The scaling dimension displayed in the main theorem is inconsistent with Proposition 6.1. For a preimage z of order k = ord_f(z), the pullback metric f^*g has a conical singularity of exponent γ = k-1 (Lemma 2.2). Proposition 6.1 then yields a per-point conformal weight c/12 · γ(γ+2)/(γ+1) = c/12 (k - 1/k), not c/12 (k-1)/k as stated in Eq. (1.2) and Eq. (6.9). This is load-bearing: for a two-sheeted cover (k=2), the stated formula gives a two-point exponent c/12, whereas Corollary 6.4 itself uses, and the Calabrese-Cardy formula requires, c/4. The proof of Proposition 6.3 invokes Proposition 6.1, so the intended result is sound, but the displayed Δ_j in the introduction, in Proposition 6.3, and in the corresponding equations must be corrected to c/12 Σ_z (ord_f(z) - 1/ord_f(z)).
  2. [Section 6.1, Lemma 6.2] Lemma 6.2 is stated without proof, yet it is used essentially in the proof of Proposition 6.1: substituting the closed form of the renormalized anomaly into Eq. (6.5) is what converts the difference of anomalies into the h(z_j) terms. The lemma may follow from Corollary 4.7 and the Green-Stokes identity, but the argument is not written out. Without a proof, Proposition 6.1 is not fully established. Please supply the proof, or a precise reference, in the revision.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.1, Definition 2.1] The word "charateristic" appears twice in Definition 2.1 and should be spelled "characteristic".
  2. [Section 6.1, proof of Proposition 6.3] After Eq. (6.11), the conclusion is stated abruptly; adding one or two sentences that apply Proposition 6.1 to each preimage of order k would make the proof self-contained.
  3. [Section 6.1, Corollary 6.4] The asymptotic statement "4(1+|z|^2)^{-2} = |z|^{-2} + O((1-|z|)^2)" is imprecise as written; it is an expansion near |z|=1 and should be phrased as an asymptotic expansion.
  4. [Section 4.2, Lemma 4.2] In the proof of the lower bound, the sentence "c would now reparametrize into a geodesic under g1" is terse; a brief explanation of why the radial curve is a geodesic for the radially symmetric metric g1 would help the reader.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the conical-anomaly computation is self-contained and the Calabrese-Cardy scaling is derived from the CFT axioms and renormalized anomaly, not fitted. (Separate correctness issue: Prop. 6.3's displayed Delta_j typo.)

full rationale

The derivation is self-contained conditional on the CFT axioms in Definition 2.1. The renormalized anomaly (Definition 2.7) is defined by a finite counterterm, and Proposition 6.1 computes the change under Weyl rescaling of a conical metric; the conformal weights Delta_j = c/12 * gamma(gamma+2)/(gamma+1) emerge from that computation (via Corollary 4.7, Lemma 6.2, and Lemma A.1) rather than being inserted to match the target Calabrese-Cardy formula. Proposition 6.3 then applies this to the pullback metric f^*g and uses the pushforward identity (6.10); the Calabrese-Cardy exponent in Corollary 6.4 is obtained from Lemma 2.1 and Proposition 6.3, not assumed as an input. The physical replica identification in Section 3 is explicitly heuristic and conditional, so Corollary 6.4 depends on that stated assumption rather than on a hidden fit. The authors' own work [23] is cited only in remarks about Segal axioms, which are not load-bearing for the main theorem; the key cited regularity input (Lemma 4.1) is an external result of Troyanov. Two non-circular caveats should be flagged: Lemma 6.2 is stated without proof and is used in the proof of Proposition 6.1, which is an omitted proof or gap rather than a circularity; and the displayed Delta_j in Proposition 6.3, equation (6.9), appears to have a typo, since Proposition 6.1 with gamma = ord-1 gives ord - 1/ord, not (ord-1)/ord, though Corollary 6.4 uses the corrected value, making this a correctness issue independent of circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central theorem is conditional on the existence of a CFT with the stated conformal covariance properties, on the admissibility of the cone metrics (Troyanov regularity), and, for the physical corollary, on the replica interpretation. No free parameters are fitted to data; the central charge c and the undetermined constant C are inputs from the CFT axioms. No new physical entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption A 2d CFT exists as a rule assigning to each Riemann surface with smooth metric a partition function Z(Σ,g) and correlation functions satisfying diffeomorphism invariance and Weyl covariance with central charge c (definition 2.1).
    The main theorem (proposition 6.3) is proved for any theory satisfying these axioms; if no such theory exists beyond the explicitly constructed GFF example, the result has no instances. The GFF is given as an example with c=1.
  • domain assumption Cone metrics are admissible: the regular metric potential φ against a smooth background metric is continuous, smooth off the cone point, has Δφ in L1, and satisfies the Troyanov estimates φ = φ(z0) + O(r^{2γ+2}), ∂φ = O(r^{2γ+1}) (definition 2.5 and lemma 4.1).
    These regularity conditions are used in lemma 4.2, corollary 4.7 and lemma 6.2 to control the divergent integrals; without them the renormalized anomaly and the scaling dimensions may change.
  • domain assumption The replica interpretation: for a state on a circle, tr_{H_A}(tr_{A^c}(ρ)^d) equals Z(Σ_d)/Z(Σ)^d for the branched cover constructed in section 3.2, and the vacuum state is represented by gluing two flat-at-the-boundary disks.
    Corollary 6.4, which recovers the Calabrese-Cardy formula, relies on this physical identification; the authors state it is heuristic (section 3).
  • standard math Troyanov's polar-coordinate lemma (lemma 4.1, from [40]) giving the normal form of a conical metric.
    Cited from the literature and used throughout section 4.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Entanglement Entropy and Cauchy-Hadamard Renormalization." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XA6MYC2D

@misc{pith2026250119014,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Entanglement Entropy and Cauchy-Hadamard Renormalization},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XA6MYC2D}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.19014}
}
abstract

This note presents a purely geometric construction of the so-called twist-field correlation functions in Conformal Field Theory (CFT), derived from conical singularities. This approach provides a purely mathematical interpretation of the seminal results in physics by Cardy and Calabrese on the entanglement entropy of quantum systems. Specifically, we begin by defining CFT partition functions on surfaces with conical singularities, using a ``Cauchy-Hadamard renormalization'' of the Polyakov anomaly integral. Next, we demonstrate that for a branched cover $f:\Sigma_d\to \Sigma$ with $d$ sheets, where the cover inherits the pullback of a smooth metric from the base, a specific ratio of partition functions on the cover to the base transforms under conformal changes of the base metric in the same way as a correlation function of CFT primary fields with specific conformal weights. We also provide a discussion of the physical background and motivation for entanglement entropy, focusing on path integrals and the replica trick, which serves as an introduction to these ideas for a mathematical audience.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Constructive Quantum Field Theory on Curved Surfaces and Related Topics

    quant-ph 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A rigorous construction of P(phi)_2 QFT on curved Riemannian surfaces satisfying Segal's axioms, plus a geometric rederivation of the Cardy-Calabrese entanglement entropy and new zeta determinant asymptotics.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 38 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Aldana, Klaus Kirsten, Julie Rowlett,Polyakov formulas for conical singularities in two dimensions, arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02776

    Clara L. Aldana, Klaus Kirsten, Julie Rowlett,Polyakov formulas for conical singularities in two dimensions, arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.02776

    work page arXiv 2010

  2. [2]

    V. G. Knizhnik. Analytic fields on Riemann surfaces. II. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 112(4):567–590, 1987

    work page 1987

  3. [3]

    Nuclear Physics B Volume 282, 1987, Pages 13-73

    Lance Dixon, Daniel Friedan, Emil Martinec and Stephen Shenker.The conformal field theory of orbifolds. Nuclear Physics B Volume 282, 1987, Pages 13-73

    work page 1987

  4. [4]

    Nuclear Physics B Volume 424, Issue 3, 15 August 1994, Pages 443-467

    Christoph Holzhey, Finn Larsen an Frank Wilczek.Geometric and renormalized entropy in conformal field theory. Nuclear Physics B Volume 424, Issue 3, 15 August 1994, Pages 443-467

    work page 1994

  5. [5]

    The semiclassical limit of Liouville conformal field theory

    Hubert Lacoin; Rémi Rhodes; Vincent Vargas. The semiclassical limit of Liouville conformal field theory. Annales de la Faculté des sciences de Toulouse : Mathématiques, Série 6, Tome 31 (2022) no. 4, pp. 1031-

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    and Peschel, Ingo,Finite Size Dependence of the Free Energy in Two-dimensional Critical Systems, Nuclear Physics B Volume 300, 1988, Pages 377-392

    Cardy, John L. and Peschel, Ingo,Finite Size Dependence of the Free Energy in Two-dimensional Critical Systems, Nuclear Physics B Volume 300, 1988, Pages 377-392

    work page 1988

  7. [7]

    Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, Volume 42, Number 50

    Pasquale Calabrese and John Cardy.Entanglement entropy and conformal field theory. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, Volume 42, Number 50

    work page

  8. [8]

    Can and P

    T. Can and P. Wiegmann,Quantum Hall states and conformal field theory on a singular surface, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, Volume 50, Number 49

    work page

Show all 43 references
  1. [9]

    Lars Ahlfors,Complex Analysis: An Introduction to the Theory of Analytic Functions of One Complex Vari- able, Third Edition, Volume: 385, AMS Chelsea Publishing, 2021

    2021

  2. [10]

    Differential Geom

    Jeff Cheeger,Spectral geometry of singular Riemannian spaces, Journal of Differential Geometry, J. Differential Geom. 18(4), 575-657, (1983)

    1983

  3. [11]

    Xianzhe Dai and Guofang Wei,Comparison Geometry for Ricci Curvature, lecture notes, available athttps: //web.math.ucsb.edu/~dai/Ricci-book.pdf

  4. [12]

    do Carmo,Riemannian Geometry, Mathematics: Theory & Applications, Birkhäuser, Boston, 1992

    Manfredo P. do Carmo,Riemannian Geometry, Mathematics: Theory & Applications, Birkhäuser, Boston, 1992

    1992

  5. [13]

    do Carmo,Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces, Revised and Updated Second Edition, Courier Dover Publications, 2016

    Manfredo P. do Carmo,Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces, Revised and Updated Second Edition, Courier Dover Publications, 2016

    2016

  6. [14]

    and Zorich, A.Sum of Lyapunov exponents of the Hodge bundle with respect to the Teichmüller geodesic flow

    Eskin, A., Kontsevich, M. and Zorich, A.Sum of Lyapunov exponents of the Hodge bundle with respect to the Teichmüller geodesic flow. Publ.math.IHES 120, 207–333 (2014)

    2014

  7. [15]

    Lectures on conformal field theory

    Krzysztof Gaw¸ edzki. Lectures on conformal field theory. InQuantum fields and strings: A course for mathe- maticians, pages 727–805. American Mathematical Society, 1999

    1999

  8. [16]

    (2021).Segal’s axioms and bootstrap for Liouville Theory

    Guillarmou, C., Kupiainen, A., Rhodes, R., and Vargas, V. (2021).Segal’s axioms and bootstrap for Liouville Theory. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.14859

    2021 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Matthew Headrick, Lectures on entanglement entropy in field theory and holography , arXiv preprint 1907.08126

    1907 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Hulin, D., Troyanov, M.Prescribing curvature on open surfaces. Math. Ann. 293, 277–315 (1992).https: //doi.org/10.1007/BF01444716 REFERENCES 27

    1992 doi

  11. [19]

    Kurt Johansson, Fredrik Viklund,Coulomb gas and the Grunsky operator on a Jordan domain with corners, arXiv:2309.00308

  12. [20]

    1016/j.jfa.2020.108866

    VictorKalvin, Polyakov-Alvarez type comparison formulas for determinants of Laplacians on Riemann surfaces with conical singularities, Journal of Functional Analysis, Volume 280, Issue 7, 2021.https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jfa.2020.108866

    2021

  13. [21]

    et al.Quantum Hall Effect and Quillen Metric

    Klevtsov, S., Ma, X., Marinescu, G. et al.Quantum Hall Effect and Quillen Metric. Commun. Math. Phys. 349, 819–855 (2017).https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-016-2789-2

    2017 doi

  14. [22]

    1093/qmath/haab027

    Maxim Kontsevich, Graeme Segal,Wick Rotation and the Positivity of Energy in Quantum Field Theory, The Quarterly Journal of Mathematics, Volume 72, Issue 1-2, June 2021, Pages 673–699,https://doi.org/10. 1093/qmath/haab027

    2021

  15. [23]

    The Bayes Principle and Segal Axioms forP (ϕ)2, with application to Periodic Covers

    Jiasheng Lin. The Bayes Principle and Segal Axioms forP (ϕ)2, with application to Periodic Covers. arXiv preprint 2403.12804

    arXiv

  16. [24]

    A Heat Trace Anomaly on Polygons

    MAZZEO, RAFE, and JULIE ROWLETT. A Heat Trace Anomaly on Polygons. Mathematical Proceed- ings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 159, no. 2 (2015): 303–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0305004115000365

    2015

  17. [25]

    PDE 8(4), 839-882, (2015)

    Rafe Mazzeo, Yanir Rubinstein, Natasa Sesum,Ricci flow on surfaces with conic singularities, Analysis & PDE, Anal. PDE 8(4), 839-882, (2015)

    2015

  18. [26]

    Ralph Phillips, Peter Sarnak,Geodesics in homology classes, Duke Math. J. 55(2): 287-297 (June 1987)

    1987

  19. [27]

    Eveliina Peltola, Yilin Wang, Large deviations of multichordal SLE 0+, real rational functions, and zeta- regularized determinants of Laplacians. J. Eur. Math. Soc. 26 (2024), no. 2, pp. 469–535

    2024

  20. [28]

    28, Société Mathématique de France, 2021

    Powell, Ellen and Wendelin Werner,Lecture Notes on the Gaussian Free Field, Cours Spécialisés, Vol. 28, Société Mathématique de France, 2021

    2021

  21. [29]

    Ray, D.B., andI.M.Singer, R-Torsion and the Laplacian on Riemannian Manifolds, AdvancesinMathematics 7, 145-210, 1971

    1971

  22. [30]

    M. Reed, B. Simon, Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics, Volume I: Functional Analysis, Academic Press, 1972

    1972

  23. [31]

    M. Reed, B. Simon,Methods of Modern Mathematical Physics, Volume II: Fourier Analysis, Self-adjointness, Academic Press, 1975

    1975

  24. [32]

    931, Springer Cham, 2017.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52573-0

    Mukund Rangamani, Tadashi Takayanagi,Holographic Entanglement Entropy, Lecture Notes in Physics vol. 931, Springer Cham, 2017.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52573-0

    2017 doi

  25. [33]

    Rudin, Walter,Functional Analysis, Second Edition, McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1991

    1991

  26. [34]

    Segal,The definition of conformal field theory, Topology, Geometry, and Quantum Field Theory, (Ed

    G. Segal,The definition of conformal field theory, Topology, Geometry, and Quantum Field Theory, (Ed. U. Tillmann), Vol. 308, London Math. Soc. Lecture Notes, London, 2004, 421–577

    2004

  27. [35]

    120, American Mathematical Society, 2005

    Simon, Barry,Trace Ideals and their Applications, Second Edition, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, Vol. 120, American Mathematical Society, 2005

    2005

  28. [36]

    Simon, Barry,The P (ϕ)2 (Euclidean) Quantum Field Theory, Princeton University Press, New Jersey, 1974

    1974

  29. [37]

    4, American Mathematical Society, 2015

    Simon, Barry,Operator Theory: A Comprehensive Course in Analysis, Part 4, Vol. 4, American Mathematical Society, 2015

    2015

  30. [38]

    REFERENCES 28

    Barry Simon, Notes on infinite determinants of Hilbert space operators, Advances in Mathematics, Volume 24, Issue 3, 1977, Pages 244-273. REFERENCES 28

    1977

  31. [39]

    Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 324, no

    Troyanov, Marc.Prescribing Curvature on Compact Surfaces with Conical Singularities. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 324, no. 2 (1991): 793–821

    1991

  32. [40]

    Annales de l’Institut Fourier, Tome 40 (1990) no

    Troyanov, Marc.Coordonnées polaires sur les surfaces riemanniennes singulières. Annales de l’Institut Fourier, Tome 40 (1990) no. 4, pp. 913-937.http://www.numdam.org/articles/10.5802/aif.1241/

    1990 doi

  33. [41]

    arXiv preprint 2412.16795

    Edward Witten.Introduction to Black Hole Thermodynamics. arXiv preprint 2412.16795

    arXiv

  34. [42]

    Alexei Zamolodchikov and Alexander Zamolodchikov,Lectures on Liouville Theory and Matrix Models, lecture notes, available at:https://qft.itp.ac.ru/ZZ.pdf

  35. [1083]

    https://afst.centre-mersenne.org/articles/10.5802/afst.1713/

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.