Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Fractons from covariant higher-rank 3D BF theory

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a covariant higher-rank BF theory in 2+1 dimensions, coupled to tensor matter currents, yields fractonic charges and maps onto the low-energy effective field theory of the Rank-2 Toric Code.

desk verdict A careful covariant rank-2 BF construction whose abstract overstates a conditional R2TC mapping: the fracton results hinge on assuming the vacuum gradient solutions survive matter coupling, i.e. J00 = K̃00 = 0. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.19154 v1 pith:LTN2JJIV submitted 2025-01-31 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mes-hallhep-th

Erica Bertolini , Alberto Blasi , Matteo Carrega , Nicola Maggiore , Daniel Sacco Shaikh This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.mes-hallhep-th
keywords quantumfieldtheorytensorgaugeBFfractonsrank-2toriccodehigher-rankChern-Simonsdipolesymmetrytopologicalinsulator
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that the most general 3D action for a symmetric tensor gauge field $a_{\mu\nu}$ and a non-symmetric tensor field $B_{\mu\nu}$, invariant under longitudinal diffeomorphisms and vector gauge transformations, is a higher-rank BF-like theory with action $S_{\mathrm{BF}}=\frac{1}{3}\int d^3x\,\epsilon^{\mu\nu\rho}B^\sigma_\mu F_{\sigma\nu\rho}$, where $F_{\mu\nu\rho}$ is the covariant fracton field strength. Once rank-2 tensor currents are coupled to this action, the equations of motion imply a scalar fractonic charge $\rho=2\partial_i J^{0i}$ whose total charge and dipole moment are conserved, together with a vector charge $\rho_i=\tilde K^{0i}$ that behaves as a lineon and becomes a fracton when the trace of the generalized electric field vanishes. The central result is that, after using the vacuum gradient solutions for $\tilde B_{j0}$ and $a_{n0}$, the theory's effective action matches the low-energy field theory of the Rank-2 Toric Code (R2TC), making this the higher-rank analogue of the known equivalence between ordinary 3D BF theory and the toric code. A completely symmetric variant of the model splits into two rank-2 Chern-Simons actions, generalizing abelian BF theory and connecting to topological dipole insulators.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the higher-rank field strength $F_{\mu\nu\rho}=\partial_\mu a_{\nu\rho}+\partial_\nu a_{\mu\rho}-2\partial_\rho a_{\mu\nu}$, invariant under both $\delta a_{\mu\nu}=\partial_\mu\partial_\nu\Lambda$ and $\delta B_{\mu\nu}=\partial_\mu\xi_\nu$, which makes the action (2.13) gauge invariant and quasi-topological, with an energy-momentum tensor that vanishes on shell. The argument then rests on two vacuum gradient solutions, $\tilde B_{j0}=\partial_j\varphi$ and $a_{n0}=\partial_n\psi$, which supply the scalar potentials that play the role of the temporal gauge field component in fracton theories and are assumed to persist when matter is added. These solutions force $J^{00}=0$ and $\tilde K^{00}=0$, turning the divergence identities $\partial_\alpha\partial_\beta J^{\alpha\beta}=0$ and $\partial_\alpha \tilde K^{\alpha\beta}=0$ into the fractonic continuity equations $\partial_0\rho+\partial_i\partial_j J^{ij}=0$ and $\partial_0\rho_i+\partial_j\tilde K^{ji}=0$, with $\rho=2\partial_i J^{0i}$ and $\rho_i=\tilde K^{0i}$. Integrating out the constrained fields yields the effective action (5.46), which is matched term by term to the dipolar BF effective theory of the R2TC.

What would settle it

Find or construct a matter configuration in the coupled theory with $J^{00}\neq 0$ or $\tilde K^{00}\neq 0$: the on-shell equations of motion then contradict the assumed gradient solutions, and the fractonic continuity equations (5.14), (5.23) and the R2TC mapping fail for that configuration. Concretely, computing the matter two-point function $\langle J^{00}(x)J^{00}(y)\rangle$ in the coupled theory and showing it is non-vanishing would falsify the assumption on which the central claim rests.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors' central claim is that the covariant rank-2 BF action (2.13), built from the symmetric tensor gauge field $a_{\mu\nu}$ and the generic tensor $B_{\mu\nu}$ with field strength $F_{\mu\nu\rho}=\partial_\mu a_{\nu\rho}+\partial_\nu a_{\mu\rho}-2\partial_\rho a_{\mu\nu}$, is not merely a formal exercise: with matter currents $J^{\mu\nu}$ and $\tilde K^{\mu\nu}$ added, it produces the defining conservation laws of fracton phases, and its low-energy effective action is the dipolar BF theory that describes the Rank-2 Toric Code. The explicit charge identifications are $\rho=2\partial_i J^{0i}$ for the fractonic scalar charge, $\rho_i=\tilde K^{0i}$ for the vector dipole-like charge, generalized electric and magnetic fields $E_{ij}=F_{ij0}$ and $B_i=\frac{2}{3}\epsilon_{0jk}F_{ijk}$, and generalized flux attachment and Hall relations $\rho_i=\frac12 B_i$ and $\tilde K^{ij}=\tilde\sigma^{ijkl}E_{kl}$. The mapping (5.47)--(5.52) identifies the BF fields with the R2TC fields and currents, with the vector charge density playing the role of the R2TC magnetic excitations, and the paper presents this as a higher-rank generalization of the ordinary 3D BF-to-toric-code equivalence.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes that the vacuum gradient solutions $\tilde B_{j0}=\partial_j\varphi$ and $a_{n0}=\partial_n\psi$ continue to hold after matter is added, which forces the matter currents to have vanishing 00-components; if that assumption fails, the fractonic conservation laws and the map to the Rank-2 Toric Code do not follow for generic matter.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The Rank-2 Toric Code acquires a covariant continuum description in terms of two tensor gauge fields, parallel to how ordinary BF theory describes the toric code.
  • A single fracton charge $\rho$ is immobile: total charge and dipole moment are conserved, while dipolar bound states can move.
  • The vector charge $\rho_i$ is generically a lineon; turning off the trace of the generalized electric field adds an angular-momentum-like conservation and makes it a fracton.
  • The theory predicts generalized Hall responses, namely flux attachment $\rho_i=\frac12 B_i$ and a tensorial Hall conductivity $\tilde\sigma^{ijkl}$, for the low-energy R2TC sector.
  • In the fully symmetric case the BF action is a difference of two rank-2 Chern-Simons actions, so the fractonic Hall interpretation carries over and the model describes two fractonic scalar charge theories relevant to topological dipole insulators.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the vacuum-solution assumption is a selection rule rather than an accident, the theory predicts that matter with $J^{00}\neq 0$ or $\tilde K^{00}\neq 0$ cannot couple to the BF sector; a lattice simulation of the R2TC with such charge injection should show no corresponding low-energy response.
  • The lineon-to-fracton transition controlled by the trace of the generalized electric field suggests that a tunable deformation of the R2TC Hamiltonian, one that controls $\operatorname{Tr} E$, could drive a transition between vector-charge and traceless-vector-charge fracton orders.
  • Because the effective action matches Eq. (3.32) of the dipolar background-field theory cited as [47], braiding phases computed from this continuum action should reproduce the position-dependent braiding phases of the R2TC; computing rank-2 Wilson-loop-like holonomies would test this.
  • The on-shell vanishing of the energy-momentum tensor implies boundary degrees of freedom may be fixed entirely by gauge fixing, so an edge-theory analysis of the symmetric model could yield a covariant derivation of topological dipole insulator edge modes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a 2+1 dimensional higher-rank BF-like theory with a symmetric tensor field a_mu nu and a generic (non-symmetric) tensor field B_mu nu, determines the invariant action by symmetry and power counting, performs a detailed gauge-fixed propagator computation, counts degrees of freedom, and then couples the theory to external tensor currents. It derives fracton and lineon continuity equations and claims a mapping to the effective field theory of the Rank-2 Toric Code. A final section treats the case where B is also symmetric and shows that the action decomposes into two rank-2 Chern-Simons terms.

Significance. The algebraic core of the paper is substantial and largely self-consistent: the propagator computation in Section 3 and Appendix A is explicit, the tracelessness condition (3.34) emerges from the existence of the inverse, and the degree-of-freedom count in Section 4 follows from the constraints. If the mapping to the R2TC holds, the paper would provide a genuinely useful covariant continuum counterpart to lattice dipole BF constructions and a higher-rank analogue of the BF/Kitaev correspondence. The explicit dictionary (5.47)-(5.52) is a valuable concrete output. However, I find that the central claims about generic matter coupling are established only for a restricted source sector, and the abstract does not convey this restriction.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 5, Eqs. (5.10)-(5.14) and (5.18)-(5.25)] The derivation of the fracton continuity equations relies on assuming that the vacuum solutions (5.11) and (5.19) persist when matter is added. This is not a harmless technical assumption: with sources, the 00-components of the equations of motion read J_00 = epsilon^{0mn} partial_m Btilde^0_n and Ktilde_00 = epsilon^{0mn} partial_m a^0_n, so assuming the gradient form is exactly equivalent to imposing J_00 = 0 and Ktilde_00 = 0. Gauge invariance only requires partial_alpha partial_beta J^{alpha beta} = 0 and partial_alpha Ktilde^{alpha beta} = 0, which do not force these components to vanish. When J_00 is nonzero, Eq. (5.13) becomes partial_0^2 J_00 + 2 partial_0 partial_i J^{0i} + partial_i partial_j J^{ij} = 0 rather than the fracton continuity equation (5.14), and when Ktilde_00 is nonzero the solenoidal condition (5.22) and the conservation statements (5.27)-(5.28) do not follow. The statement in Section 5 that the assumption is made 'in order to preserve the fractonic field content' is therefore close to circular: the fractonic content is the conclusion being derived. The abstract's claim that fracton behaviour 'naturally emerges' for the coupled theory should be qualified to a sector with J_00 = Ktilde_00 = 0, unless a physical argument is supplied for why these components vanish.
  2. [Section 5, Eqs. (5.46)-(5.52)] The map to the Rank-2 Toric Code is obtained by integrating out fields using the vacuum solutions, which the paper notes also implies Ktilde^{i0} = 0 in addition to J_00 = 0 and Ktilde_00 = 0. Thus the effective action S_eff (5.46) and the dictionary (5.47)-(5.52) describe only a restricted source sector. This limitation is acknowledged in Section 7 ('When this condition is trivially satisfied, i.e. when Ktilde^{i0} = 0'), but the abstract and the introduction state the R2TC mapping without that qualification. The unqualified statement should be revised, or the restriction should be justified as a physically distinguished sector of the theory.
  3. [Section 6, Eqs. (6.13)-(6.18)] The same restrictive assumption appears in the fully symmetric case. The vacuum solutions (6.15)-(6.16) are assumed to persist with matter, which enforces the vanishing of the 00-components of the traceless currents Jtilde^{alpha beta} and ktilde^{alpha beta}. Without this, the continuity equations (6.17)-(6.18) and the consequent lineon/fracton interpretation are not derived for generic coupled matter. The claims in Section 6 should be formulated as applying to that sector, or the mechanism that produces such currents should be specified.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 2.1] There is a typo 'definining' in the sentence introducing the discrete symmetry P.
  2. [Eq. (6.6)] The displayed invariance condition reads delta'_1 S = delta'_1 S; the second variation should presumably be delta'_2 S.
  3. [Section 3 and Appendix A] The pole conditions (3.43) are interpreted as values for which the theory is not defined, but since the gauge-fixing parameters are unphysical, a brief remark on why these poles cannot be removed by a field redefinition or a different gauge choice would be helpful.
  4. [Section 5, around Eq. (5.46)] The target action Eq. (3.32) of Ref. [47] is not displayed, so the reader cannot verify the claimed mapping without consulting that reference; reproducing the relevant terms would make the central comparison self-contained.
  5. [Section 7] The conclusions already contain the crucial qualification about Ktilde^{i0} = 0; this qualification should be moved into the abstract and introduction so that the advertised claim matches the proven statement.

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Fractonic behavior and the R2TC map are derived only after assuming vacuum gradient solutions that are equivalent to J00=0 and K̃00=0, so the claim that fracton behavior 'naturally emerges' is partially circular.

  1. self definitional [Section 5, Eqs. (5.10)-(5.14)]
    "From now on, we will assume the solution (5.11) to hold also when matter is introduced, in order to preserve the fractonic field content. As we shall see below, this is crucial in order to have a fractonic physical interpretation of our theory. This assumption on the on-shell EoM (5.8) implies J 00 = 0 ."

    In vacuum, Eq. (5.10) is ǫ0mn∂m B̃0n = 0, solved by B̃j0 = ∂jφ. With matter, the 00-component of the same EoM (5.8) reads J00 = ǫ0mn∂m B̃0n. Therefore assuming (5.11) persists is exactly the statement J00 = 0, as the paper itself notes. This zero is then used to reduce the identity ∂α∂βJαβ = 0 to the fracton continuity equation (5.14). Thus the fractonic charge and dipole conservation are not derived from the coupled dynamics for generic matter; they are imposed by assuming the vacuum solution 'in order to preserve the fractonic field content'.

  2. self definitional [Section 5, Eqs. (5.18)-(5.25)]
    "In analogy to (5.11), from now on we will assume that the solution (5.19) continues to be true when matter is introduced. Thus, when using the solution (5.19) in the 00-component of the on-shell EoM (5.9), it implies K̃ 00 = 0 , which, again, will play an important role in the physical interpretation of the theory."

    The same structure repeats for the second current: in vacuum, ǫ0mn∂m a0n = 0 gives a0n = ∂nψ; with matter, the 00-component is K̃00 = ǫ0mn∂m a0n, so assuming (5.19) is equivalent to setting K̃00 = 0. This vanishing is essential for the solenoidal condition (5.22) and for the vector continuity equation (5.23), whose divergence yields the fracton equation (5.25). The vector-charge/lineon/fracton content is therefore inserted by assumption rather than emerging from generic gauge-invariant matter satisfying only ∂αK̃αβ = 0.

1 more flagged steps
  1. other [Section 5, between Eqs. (5.45) and (5.46)]
    "Using the vacuum solutions of the on-shell EoM (5.8) and (5.9) for a00(x) and B̃α0(x), thus implying K̃i0(x)=0 in addition to (5.12) and (5.20), these fields can be integrated out from the partition function associated to the total action Stot (5.5), which leads to the effective action Sef f (5.46), which can be mapped into Eq. (3.32) of [47]."

    The central R2TC mapping is not a property of the generic coupled theory: it requires the additional vacuum-solution condition K̃i0 = 0, on top of J00 = 0 and K̃00 = 0. The advertised equivalence is therefore established only after imposing the very restrictions that define the fractonic sector. Generic gauge-invariant matter is not shown to reduce to the R2TC effective action, so the unqualified abstract claim that 'our theory can be mapped' to the R2TC is a conditional statement presented as an unconditional result.

full rationale

The pure-field part of the paper (Sections 2-4) is self-contained: the action (2.13) is fixed by locality, power counting, the stated gauge symmetries and a discrete P-charge, not by fitting the R2TC action. The propagator and degree-of-freedom computations are internally consistent. The R2TC dictionary (5.47)-(5.52) is an external comparison with [47] and [32], and the self-citations ([38], [41], [49]) are used as technical vocabulary or background, not as the target result; none of them is load-bearing in a circular way. However, the matter-coupled derivation of fracton behavior is conditional in a way that partially reduces to its own assumption. In vacuum, (5.10) implies B̃j0 = ∂jφ; with matter, the 00-component of (5.8) reads J00 = ǫ0mn∂m B̃0n, so the paper's assertion that the vacuum solution persists is exactly J00 = 0. The paper says this is assumed 'in order to preserve the fractonic field content'; it then uses J00 = 0 to turn the identity ∂α∂βJαβ = 0 into the fracton equation (5.14). The analogous assumption (5.19) equivalently sets K̃00 = 0 and is needed for (5.22)-(5.25). Generic gauge-invariant sources satisfying only ∂α∂βJαβ = 0 and ∂αK̃αβ = 0 need not have vanishing 00-components, so the advertised 'fracton behaviour naturally emerges' is not a prediction from the BF action alone; it holds only for the sector selected by the vacuum-solution ansatz. The paper is honest about the assumption, but the central claim is partly circular: the fractonic content is preserved by assumption rather than derived for generic matter. The R2TC map is similarly conditioned on K̃i0 = 0. For these reasons the circularity score is 6 rather than higher: the action itself and the external R2TC dictionary retain independent content, and the paper does not hide the assumptions.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The physical content rests on no fitted parameters: the gauge-fixing parameters are gauge choices, and the λ parameter is fixed by consistency. The main modeling assumptions are the restriction to one-derivative actions and the persistence of the vacuum solutions when matter is introduced. No new particles or mediators are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • Gauge-fixing parameters k0, k1, κ0, κ1, κ2 = Landau gauge: k=κ=0; consistency requires κ0+3κ1=0
    Introduced in the gauge-fixing term (2.29). They are arbitrary gauge parameters, not fitted to data; the tracelessness condition (3.34) is a consistency requirement for the propagators.
  • Identity-mixing parameter λ = -1/3
    Introduced in the identity matrix (3.26)-(3.27) to track the trace sector; the propagators exist only for λ=-1/3.
assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption The action is restricted to functionals with one derivative only.
    Section 2.1: 'Restricting to functionals with one derivative only' selects BF/CS-like actions; two-derivative terms are excluded by power counting and locality, which is standard for topological field theories.
  • domain assumption The vacuum solutions (5.11) and (5.19) for the 00-components persist when matter is added.
    Section 5: 'we will assume the solution (5.11) to hold also when matter is introduced'; this enforces J_00=0 and K̃_00=0 and is needed for the fractonic continuity equations (5.14), (5.23), and (5.25).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fractons from covariant higher-rank 3D BF theory." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LTN2JJIV

@misc{pith2026250119154,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fractons from covariant higher-rank 3D BF theory},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LTN2JJIV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.19154}
}
abstract

In this paper we study the 3D gauge theory of two tensor gauge fields: $a_{\mu\nu}(x)$, which we take symmetric, and $B_{\mu\nu}(x)$, with no symmetry on its indices. The corresponding invariant action is a higher-rank BF-like model, which is first considered from a purely field theoretical point of view, and the propagators with their poles and the degrees of freedom are studied. Once matter is introduced, a fracton behaviour naturally emerges. We show that our theory can be mapped to the low-energy effective field theory describing the Rank-2 Toric Code (R2TC). This relation between our covariant BF-like theory and the R2TC is a higher-rank generalization of the equivalence between the ordinary 3D BF theory and the Kitaev's Toric Code. In the last part of the paper we analyze the case in which the field $B_{\mu\nu}(x)$ is a symmetric tensor. It turns out that the obtained BF-like action can be cast into the sum of two rank-2 Chern-Simons actions, thus generalizing the ordinary abelian case. Therefore, this represents a higher-rank generalization of the ordinary 3D BF theory, which well describes the low-energy physics of quantum spin Hall insulators in two spatial dimensions.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Partially Massless Superconductor

    hep-th 2025-07 conditional novelty 8.0 of 10

    A covariant Higgs mechanism turns the partially massless graviton into a fully massive spin-2 field by condensing a fractonic matter field with dipole symmetry.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [47]

    Dipolar background field theory and dipolar b raiding statistics,

    J. H. Han, “Dipolar background field theory and dipolar b raiding statistics,” Phys. Rev. B 109 (2024) no.23, 235127 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.109.235127

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.109.235127 2024

  2. [1]

    Field Theories of Condensed Matter Physi cs,

    E. H. Fradkin, “Field Theories of Condensed Matter Physi cs,” Front. Phys. 82 (2013), 1-852 Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013, ISBN 978-0-521-76444-5, 978- 1-107-30214-3

    work page 2013

  3. [2]

    More Is Different,

    P. W. Anderson, “More Is Different,” Science 177 (1972) no.4047, 393-396 doi:10.1126/science.177.4047.393

    doi:10.1126/science.177.4047.393 1972

  4. [3]

    Quantum Phase Transitions,

    S. Sachdev, “Quantum Phase Transitions,” Cambridge Uni versity Press, 2011, ISBN 978-0- 511-97376-5 doi:10.1017/cbo9780511973765

    doi:10.1017/cbo9780511973765 2011

  5. [4]

    Quantum Hall fluids,

    A. Zee, “Quantum Hall fluids,” Lect. Notes Phys. 456 (1995), 99-153 doi:10.1007/BFb0113369

    work page doi:10.1007/bfb0113369 1995

  6. [5]

    Aspects Of Chern-Simons Theory

    Dunne, G.V. (1999). “Aspects Of Chern-Simons Theory.” i n Comtet, A., Jolicoeur, T., Ouvry, S., David, F. (eds) “Aspects topologiques de la physique en b asse dimension. Topological aspects of low dimensional systems.” Les Houches - Ecole d?E te de Physique Theorique, vol

    work page 1999

  7. [6]

    Top ological field theory,

    D. Birmingham, M. Blau, M. Rakowski and G. Thompson, “Top ological field theory,” Phys. Rept. 209 (1991), 129-340 doi:10.1016/0370-1573(91)90117-5

    doi:10.1016/0370-1573(91)90117-5 1991

  8. [7]

    Non-Abelian BF theory for 2+1 dimensional topological states of matter,

    A. Blasi, A. Braggio, M. Carrega, D. Ferraro, N. Maggiore and N. Magnoli, “Non-Abelian BF theory for 2+1 dimensional topological states of matter, ” New J. Phys. 14 (2012), 013060 doi:10.1088/1367-2630/14/1/013060

    doi:10.1088/1367-2630/14/1/013060 2012

Show all 63 references
  1. [8]

    Lectures on the Quantum Hall Effect,

    D. Tong, “Lectures on the Quantum Hall Effect,” [arXiv:160 6.06687 [hep-th]]

  2. [9]

    Topological Insulators,

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, “Topological Insulators,” Rev . Mod. Phys. 82 (2010), 3045 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.82.3045

    2010 doi

  3. [10]

    Topological BF field theory des cription of topological insulators,

    G. Y. Cho and J. E. Moore, “Topological BF field theory des cription of topological insulators,” Annals Phys. 326 (2011), 1515-1535 doi:10.1016/j.aop.2010.12.011

    2011 doi

  4. [11]

    A New Kind of Topological Qua ntum Order: A Dimensional Hierarchy of Quasiparticles Built from Stationary Excitat ions,

    S. Vijay, J. Haah and L. Fu, “A New Kind of Topological Qua ntum Order: A Dimensional Hierarchy of Quasiparticles Built from Stationary Excitat ions,” Phys. Rev. B 92 (2015) no.23, 235136 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.92.235136

    2015 doi

  5. [12]

    Emergent Phases of Fractonic Matter,

    A. Prem, M. Pretko and R. Nandkishore, “Emergent Phases of Fractonic Matter,” Phys. Rev. B 97 (2018) no.8, 085116 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.97.085116. 32

    2018 doi

  6. [13]

    Fracton Phases of Matter,

    M. Pretko, X. Chen and Y. You, “Fracton Phases of Matter, ” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 35 (2020) no.06, 2030003 doi:10.1142/S0217751X20300033

    2020 doi

  7. [14]

    Colloquium: Fracton mat ter,

    A. Gromov and L. Radzihovsky, “Colloquium: Fracton mat ter,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 96 (2024) no.1, 011001 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.96.011001

    2024 doi

  8. [15]

    Quantum Glassiness,

    C. Chamon, “Quantum Glassiness,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) no.4, 040402 doi:10.1103/physrevlett.94.040402

    2005 doi

  9. [16]

    Local stabilizer codes in three dimensions wi thout string logical operators,

    J. Haah, “Local stabilizer codes in three dimensions wi thout string logical operators,” Phys. Rev. A 83 (2011) no.4, 042330 doi:10.1103/physreva.83.042330

    2011 doi

  10. [17]

    Fracton Topological Order, Generalized Lattice Gauge Theory and Duality,

    S. Vijay, J. Haah and L. Fu, “Fracton Topological Order, Generalized Lattice Gauge Theory and Duality,” Phys. Rev. B 94 (2016) no.23, 235157 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.94.235157

    2016 doi

  11. [18]

    Quantum Field Theory of X-Cube F racton Topological Or- der and Robust Degeneracy from Geometry,

    K. Slagle and Y. B. Kim, “Quantum Field Theory of X-Cube F racton Topological Or- der and Robust Degeneracy from Geometry,” Phys. Rev. B 96 (2017) no.19, 195139 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.96.195139

    2017 doi

  12. [19]

    Exotic Symmetries, Duality, and Fractons in 2+1-Dimensional Quantum Field Theory,

    N. Seiberg and S. H. Shao, “Exotic Symmetries, Duality, and Fractons in 2+1-Dimensional Quantum Field Theory,” SciPost Phys. 10 (2021) no.2, 027 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.10.2.027

    2021 doi

  13. [20]

    A Chern-Simons theory for dipole symmetry,

    X. Huang, “A Chern-Simons theory for dipole symmetry,” SciPost Phys. 15 (2023) no.4, 153 doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.15.4.153

    2023 doi

  14. [21]

    Fracton-Elasticity Dua lity,

    M. Pretko and L. Radzihovsky, “Fracton-Elasticity Dua lity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 120 (2018) no.19, 195301 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.195301

    2018 doi

  15. [22]

    Chiral Topological Elasticity and Fracton Order,

    A. Gromov, “Chiral Topological Elasticity and Fracton Order,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 122 (2019) no.7, 076403 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.076403

    2019 doi

  16. [23]

    Fracton hydr odynamics,

    A. Gromov, A. Lucas and R. M. Nandkishore, “Fracton hydr odynamics,” Phys. Rev. Res. 2 (2020) no.3, 033124 doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.0331 24

    2020 doi

  17. [24]

    Hydrodynamics of ideal fracton fluids,

    K. T. Grosvenor, C. Hoyos, F. Pe˜ na-Ben ´ ıtez and P. Sur´owka, “Hydrodynamics of ideal fracton fluids,” Phys. Rev. Res. 3 (2021) no.4, 043186 doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.3.0431 86

    2021 doi

  18. [25]

    Vortices as fractons,

    D. Doshi and A. Gromov, “Vortices as fractons,” Commun P hys 4, 44 (2021) doi:10.1038/s42005-021-00540-4

    2021 doi

  19. [26]

    Emergent gravity of fractons: Mach’s princ iple revisited,

    M. Pretko, “Emergent gravity of fractons: Mach’s princ iple revisited,” Phys. Rev. D 96 (2017) no.2, 024051 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.96.024051. 33

    2017 doi

  20. [27]

    The theory of symmetric tenso r field: From fractons to gravitons and back,

    A. Blasi and N. Maggiore, “The theory of symmetric tenso r field: From fractons to gravitons and back,” Phys. Lett. B 833 (2022), 137304 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2022.137304

    2022

  21. [28]

    Fracton gravity from spacetime dipole symmetry,

    E. Afxonidis, A. Caddeo, C. Hoyos and D. Musso, “Fracton gravity from spacetime dipole symmetry,” Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024) no.6, 065013 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.065013

    2024 doi

  22. [29]

    Generalized Electromagnetism of Subdimen sional Particles: A Spin Liquid Story,

    M. Pretko, “Generalized Electromagnetism of Subdimen sional Particles: A Spin Liquid Story,” Phys. Rev. B 96 (2017) no.3, 035119 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.96.035119

    2017 doi

  23. [30]

    Fault tolerant quantum computation by an yons,

    A. Y. Kitaev, “Fault tolerant quantum computation by an yons,” Annals Phys. 303 (2003), 2-30 doi:10.1016/S0003-4916(02)00018-0

    2003 doi

  24. [31]

    Rank-2 toric cod e in two dimensions,

    Y. T. Oh, J. Kim, E. G. Moon and J. H. Han, “Rank-2 toric cod e in two dimensions,” Phys. Rev. B 105, no.4, 045128 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.105.045128

    2022 doi

  25. [32]

    Effective field theory of dipo lar braiding statistics in two dimensions,

    Y. T. Oh, J. Kim and J. H. Han, “Effective field theory of dipo lar braiding statistics in two dimensions,” Phys. Rev. B 106, no.15, 155150 (2022) doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.106.155150

    2022 doi

  26. [33]

    Position-dependent excitatio ns and UV/IR mixing in the ZN rank- 2 toric code and its low-energy effective field theory,

    S. D. Pace and X. G. Wen, “Position-dependent excitatio ns and UV/IR mixing in the ZN rank- 2 toric code and its low-energy effective field theory,” Phys. R ev. B 106 (2022) no.4, 045145 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.106.045145

    2022 doi

  27. [34]

    Aspect s of ZN rank-2 gauge theory in (2+1) dimensions: Construction schemes, holonomies, and s ublattice one-form symmetries,

    Y. T. Oh, S. D. Pace, J. H. Han, Y. You and H. Y. Lee, “Aspect s of ZN rank-2 gauge theory in (2+1) dimensions: Construction schemes, holonomies, and s ublattice one-form symmetries,” Phys. Rev. B 107 (2023) no.15, 155151 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.107.155151

    2023 doi

  28. [35]

    The Higgs Mechanism in Hig her-Rank Symmetric U (1) Gauge Theories,

    D. Bulmash and M. Barkeshli, “The Higgs Mechanism in Hig her-Rank Symmetric U (1) Gauge Theories,” Phys. Rev. B 97 (2018) no.23, 235112 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.97.235112

    2018 doi

  29. [36]

    Foliated field theo ries and multipole symmetries,

    H. Ebisu, M. Honda and T. Nakanishi, “Foliated field theo ries and multipole symmetries,” Phys. Rev. B 109 (2024) no.16, 165112 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.109.165112

    2024 doi

  30. [37]

    Foliated Quantum Field Theory of Fracton Or der,

    K. Slagle, “Foliated Quantum Field Theory of Fracton Or der,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 126 (2021) no.10, 101603 doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.101603

    2021 doi

  31. [38]

    Maxwell theory of fracto ns,

    E. Bertolini and N. Maggiore, “Maxwell theory of fracto ns,” Phys. Rev. D 106 (2022) no.12, 125008 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.106.125008

    2022 doi

  32. [39]

    Gau ging Fractons and Linearized Grav- ity,

    E. Bertolini, A. Blasi, A. Damonte and N. Maggiore, “Gau ging Fractons and Linearized Grav- ity,” Symmetry 15 (2023) no.4, 945 doi:10.3390/sym15040945. 34

    2023 doi

  33. [40]

    Covariant fr acton gauge theory with boundary,

    E. Bertolini, N. Maggiore and G. Palumbo, “Covariant fr acton gauge theory with boundary,” Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) no.2, 025009 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.025009

    2023 doi

  34. [41]

    Ha ll-like behaviour of higher rank Chern-Simons theory of fractons,

    E. Bertolini, A. Blasi, N. Maggiore and D. S. Shaikh, “Ha ll-like behaviour of higher rank Chern-Simons theory of fractons,” JHEP 10 (2024), 232 doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2024)232

    2024 doi

  35. [42]

    The dimensional reduc tion of linearized spin-2 the- ories invariant under transverse diffeomorphisms,

    D. Dalmazi and R. R. L. d. Santos, “The dimensional reduc tion of linearized spin-2 the- ories invariant under transverse diffeomorphisms,” Eur. Phy s. J. C 81 (2021) no.6, 547 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09297-0

    2021 doi

  36. [43]

    Theoretical Aspects of Massive Gra vity,

    K. Hinterbichler, “Theoretical Aspects of Massive Gra vity,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 84 (2012), 671- 710 doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.84.671

    2012 doi

  37. [44]

    A note on harmonic gauge(s) in massive gravity,

    G. Gambuti and N. Maggiore, “A note on harmonic gauge(s) in massive gravity,” Phys. Lett. B 807 (2020), 135530 doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2020.135530

    2020

  38. [45]

    Fierz–Pauli theory reload ed: from a theory of a sym- metric tensor field to linearized massive gravity,

    G. Gambuti and N. Maggiore, “Fierz–Pauli theory reload ed: from a theory of a sym- metric tensor field to linearized massive gravity,” Eur. Phy s. J. C 81 (2021) no.2, 171 doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-08962-8

    2021 doi

  39. [46]

    Theory of a symmetric ten sor field with boundary: Kac-Moody algebras in linearized gravity,

    E. Bertolini and N. Maggiore, “Theory of a symmetric ten sor field with boundary: Kac-Moody algebras in linearized gravity,” Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023) no.10, 105012 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.105012

    2023 doi

  40. [48]

    Topological dipole insul ator,

    H. T. Lam, J. H. Han and Y. You, “Topological dipole insul ator,” SciPost Phys. 17, no.5, 137 (2024) doi:10.21468/SciPostPhys.17.5.137

    2024 doi

  41. [49]

    Quasi-topolog ical fractons: a 3D dipolar gauge theory,

    E. Bertolini, A. Blasi and N. Maggiore, “Quasi-topolog ical fractons: a 3D dipolar gauge theory,” Eur. Phys. J. C 85, no.1, 68 (2025) doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-13821-x

    2025 doi

  42. [50]

    Covariant Quantization of the Electrom agnetic Field in the Landau Gauge,

    N. Nakanishi, “Covariant Quantization of the Electrom agnetic Field in the Landau Gauge,” Prog. Theor. Phys. 35 (1966), 1111-1116 doi:10.1143/PTP.35.1111

    1966 doi

  43. [51]

    Canonical Quantum Electrodynamics In Cov ariant Gauges,

    B. Lautrup, “Canonical Quantum Electrodynamics In Cov ariant Gauges,” Kong. Dan. Vid. Sel. Mat. Fys. Med. 35, no. 11 (1967)

    1967

  44. [52]

    A Note on Perturbative Chern- Simons Theory,

    L. Alvarez-Gaume, J. M. F. Labastida and A. V. Ramallo, “ A Note on Perturbative Chern- Simons Theory,” Nucl. Phys. B 334 (1990), 103-124 doi:10.1016/0550-3213(90)90658-Z. 35

    1990 doi

  45. [53]

    Subdimensional Particle Structure of High er Rank U(1) Spin Liquids,

    M. Pretko, “Subdimensional Particle Structure of High er Rank U(1) Spin Liquids,” Phys. Rev. B 95 (2017) no.11, 115139 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.95.115139

    2017 doi

  46. [54]

    Supercond uctors are topologically ordered,

    T. H. Hansson, V. Oganesyan and S. L. Sondhi, “Supercond uctors are topologically ordered,” Annals Phys. 313 (2004) no.2, 497-538 doi:10.1016/j.aop.2004.05.006

    2004 doi

  47. [55]

    Higher-Spin Witten Effect and Two-Dimension al Fracton Phases,

    M. Pretko, “Higher-Spin Witten Effect and Two-Dimension al Fracton Phases,” Phys. Rev. B 96 (2017) no.12, 125151 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.96.125151

    2017 doi

  48. [56]

    Coupled-wire constructions: a Luttinger liq uid approach to topology,

    T. Meng, “Coupled-wire constructions: a Luttinger liq uid approach to topology,” Eur. Phys. J. ST 229 (2020) no.4, 527-543 doi:10.1140/epjst/e2019-900095-5

    2020 doi

  49. [57]

    Chiral Luttinger Liquid and the Edge Excitat ions in the Fractional Quantum Hall States,

    X. G. Wen, “Chiral Luttinger Liquid and the Edge Excitat ions in the Fractional Quantum Hall States,” Phys. Rev. B 41 (1990), 12838-12844 doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.41.12838

    1990 doi

  50. [58]

    Introduction of a boundary in topological field theories,

    A. Amoretti, A. Braggio, G. Caruso, N. Maggiore and N. Ma gnoli, “Introduction of a boundary in topological field theories,” Phys. Rev. D 90 (2014) no.12, 125006 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.125006

    2014 doi

  51. [59]

    Holographic reduction of Maxwell-Chern -Simons theory,

    N. Maggiore, “Holographic reduction of Maxwell-Chern -Simons theory,” Eur. Phys. J. Plus 133 (2018) no.7, 281 doi:10.1140/epjp/i2018-12130-y

    2018 doi

  52. [60]

    From Chern–Simons to Tomonaga–Luttinge r,

    N. Maggiore, “From Chern–Simons to Tomonaga–Luttinge r,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 33 (2018) no.02, 1850013 doi:10.1142/S0217751X18500136

    2018 doi

  53. [61]

    Notes from th e bulk: Metric dependence of the edge states of Chern-Simons theory,

    E. Bertolini, G. Gambuti and N. Maggiore, “Notes from th e bulk: Metric dependence of the edge states of Chern-Simons theory,” Phys. Rev. D 104 (2021) no.10, 105011 doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.104.105011

    2021 doi

  54. [62]

    Topological BF Description of 2D Accelerated Chiral Edge Modes,

    E. Bertolini, F. Fecit and N. Maggiore, “Topological BF Description of 2D Accelerated Chiral Edge Modes,” Symmetry 14 (2022) no.4, 675 doi:10.3390/sym14040675. 36

    2022 doi

  55. [69]

    doi.org/10.1007/3-540 -46637-1 [arXiv:hep-th/9902115 [hep- th]]

    Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. doi.org/10.1007/3-540 -46637-1 [arXiv:hep-th/9902115 [hep- th]]

    arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.