Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 33 references

Electron Acceleration in Carbon Nanotubes

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims the first numerical demonstration of TeV/m-scale electron acceleration driven by an 800 nm infrared laser in a structured carbon nanotube target, via self-injection into a wakefield bubble.

desk verdict First IR-laser CNT wakefield acceleration simulation, but the TeV/m numbers rest on a 25 nm/one-macro-per-cell model with no convergence study. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.00183 v2 pith:GDIGHFIG submitted 2025-01-31 physics.acc-ph

Cristian Bontoiu , Alexandre Bonatto , Öznur Apsimon , Laura Bandiera , Gianluca Cavoto , Illya Drebot , Giancarlo Gatti , Jorge Giner-Navarro
show 11 more authors
Bifeng Lei Pablo Martín-Luna Ilaria Rago Juan Rodríguez Pérez Bruno Silveira Nunes Alexei Sytov Constantinos Valagiannopoulos Carsten P. Welsch Guoxing Xia Jiaqi Zhang Javier Resta-López
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.acc-ph
keywords laserwakefieldaccelerationcarbonnanotubesself-injectionbubbleparticle-in-cellsimulationTeV/mgradientnanostructuredtargets800nm
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims the first numerical demonstration of electron acceleration by self-injection into a wakefield bubble driven by an infrared (800 nm) laser in a structured carbon nanotube target. Using a fully 3D particle-in-cell simulation, it models bundles of carbon nanotubes as 25 nm-thick tubes with an effective plasma density of $10^{20}$ cm$^{-3}$, and finds that a three-cycle, $10^{21}$ W/cm$^2$ pulse produces a 867.5 pC electron bunch with average energy 27.9 MeV (maximum 63.6 MeV) after 15 micrometers of propagation. The corresponding average and maximum accelerating gradients are 1.86 TeV/m and 4.24 TeV/m. If correct, this would show that widely available infrared lasers, rather than attosecond X-ray or ultraviolet drivers, can reach TeV/m gradients in solid-state nanostructures.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the reduction of effective plasma density by geometric structuring. The target is made of carbon nanotube bundles (modeled as 25 nm-thick tubes at $10^{22}$ cm$^{-3}$) arranged in concentric shells with voids, giving a whole-target effective electron density of $10^{20}$ cm$^{-3}$; at this density the plasma frequency stays below the 800 nm laser frequency even after multiple ionization, so the pulse propagates and excites a wakefield bubble. The bubble, the same nonlinear structure familiar from gas-phase laser wakefield acceleration, traps electrons from the target walls and accelerates them in its rear, with the induced azimuthal magnetic field providing transverse focusing.

What would settle it

A direct test would be a higher-resolution particle-in-cell run with sub-nanometer cells and wall thickness closer to a physical nanotube (about 1 nm), keeping the same effective density; if the self-injected bunch charge or the >1 TeV/m gradient disappears, the central claim fails. A complementary experimental check would measure bunch charge and energy from an 800 nm pulse on a carbon nanotube target at an existing high-power infrared laser facility and compare with the simulated 867 pC and 27.9 MeV.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that a solid-state nanostructured target can behave like a gaseous plasma for laser wakefield acceleration: the voids between carbon nanotube bundles lower the effective plasma density enough that an 800 nm pulse remains underdense, ionizes the carbon walls, and drives a nonlinear wakefield bubble in which electrons self-inject and are accelerated to tens of MeV over 15 $\mu$m. The paper reports a self-injected bunch of 867.5 pC charge with average kinetic energy 27.9 MeV and a maximum of 63.6 MeV, corresponding to average and peak gradients of 1.86 TeV/m and 4.24 TeV/m; it also reports a peak longitudinal accelerating field above 5 TV/m and an induced azimuthal magnetic field peaking near 50 kT. The authors present this as the first numerical evidence that TeV/m-scale acceleration is achievable with an infrared laser in a solid nanostructured target, not merely with ultraviolet or X-ray drivers.

Load-bearing premise

The simulation treats each carbon nanotube bundle as a 25 nm-thick uniform carbon wall at $10^{22}$ cm$^{-3}$ with one macroparticle per 25 nm cell, whereas real CNT walls are about 1 nm thick; the paper gives no convergence check showing that this coarse resolution preserves the wakefield bubble and the quoted beam parameters.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the simulation is correct, TeV/m-scale wakefield acceleration no longer requires attosecond X-ray or ultraviolet drivers; an 800 nm laser, a standard high-power infrared source, can in principle do the job.
  • The predicted bunch parameters (867 pC charge, few-fs duration, roughly 28 MeV average energy, and about 2 $\pi$ mm-mrad emittance) would make this scheme a candidate injector for ultrafast electron diffraction and other compact applications.
  • The 50 kT-level induced magnetic field, if realized, could serve as a short-lived focusing element or an extreme-field source, although the paper treats it mainly as a transverse focusing mechanism.
  • A proof-of-principle experiment using currently achievable laser parameters could test whether the predicted charge and gradients appear in a real carbon nanotube target.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The 25 nm wall thickness is a coarse stand-in for real CNT bundles (individual tubes are about 1 nm thick); if finer resolution changes the effective density or the bubble structure, the exact numbers could shift, but the scheme's viability depends on the effective-density assumption rather than on wall thickness per se.
  • The same effective-density design principle could be transferred to other nanostructured geometries, such as graphene multilayers or aligned tube forests, to match other driver wavelengths or to shape the plasma density radially and reduce the simulated divergence.
  • The paper's reported dephasing and charge-intake dynamics at $10^{21}$ W/cm$^2$ suggest an optimal intensity window exists; a parameter scan over intensity, bore radius, and shell spacing might reveal a higher-charge, lower-energy-spread operating point.
  • Because the carbon ion lattice remains nearly stationary over the acceleration time, the scheme might be extendable to solid-density targets beyond carbon, provided the underdense condition can be met.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports fully 3D particle-in-cell simulations, using PIConGPU, of an 800 nm infrared laser pulse interacting with a structured target made of carbon nanotube bundles. The CNT bundles are modeled as 25 nm-thick homogeneous carbon tubes with an initial density of 1e22 cm^-3, arranged in concentric shells to reach an effective plasma density of 1e20 cm^-3. The laser (three cycles, 1e21 W/cm^2, 1.5 um spot size) ionizes the target, drives a wakefield bubble, and self-injects an electron bunch. At the end of a 15 um propagation, the authors report a bunch charge of 867.5 pC, average kinetic energy 27.9 MeV, maximum energy 63.6 MeV, and average and maximum gradients of 1.86 TeV/m and 4.24 TeV/m. A second case at 1e20 W/cm^2 yields a lower charge (0.12 nC). The paper claims this is the first numerical demonstration of TeV/m-scale acceleration driven by an infrared laser in a nanostructured solid target.

Significance. If the reported gradients and bunch parameters are robust, the result is significant: it would extend laser wakefield acceleration to structured solid-state targets driven by widely available 800 nm lasers, in contrast to the attosecond X-ray or ultraviolet drivers previously considered for solid-density plasmas. The simulation is a legitimate application of an established PIC code, and the acceleration result is emergent rather than a post-hoc fit to a predetermined model. The paper also provides a concrete target geometry, explicit laser parameters, and beam characterization (charge, energy spread, emittance, divergence), which are useful for planning experiments. However, the central numerical result is not yet established because the simulation resolution and particle statistics are not shown to be converged; the reported charge and gradient may depend on the discretization rather than on the physical target properties.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 1 (Methods)] The simulation uses a uniform 25 nm mesh with one macroparticle per cell, and the modeled CNT wall thickness is also 25 nm (abstract and Fig. 1). No convergence study over mesh size or macroparticle number is presented. Because the wall is only one cell thick and the initial plasma density is 1e22 cm^-3, the target geometry and the ionization/wakefield dynamics may be dominated by the grid. Consequently, the central quantities quoted in Section 2.1 (867.5 pC bunch charge and 1.86 TeV/m average gradient) cannot yet be distinguished from numerical artifacts. I request a resolution study (e.g., 12.5 nm and 6.25 nm cell sizes, and a factor of 2-4 more macroparticles per cell) that demonstrates convergence of the bunch charge, energy spectrum, and longitudinal field amplitude.
  2. [Section 2.1 (Self-injection and acceleration; Figs. 5 and 6)] Self-injection into a wakefield bubble is a threshold process that is sensitive to small density perturbations. With one macroparticle per cell at near-solid density, the charge-density noise is of the order of the local density itself, so the sudden charge jump at t/T ~ 17 and the final 867.5 pC charge may be seeded by numerical shot noise. The paper does not quantify the noise level or show that the injection event is robust to particle-statistics changes. I recommend at least one additional simulation with more macroparticles per cell (or a quieter initialization) to verify that the injected charge and the time evolution in Figs. 5 and 6 are unchanged.
  3. [Section 2.3 (Effects on the ionic lattice)] The ion-displacement analysis validates the assumption of a nearly immobile carbon lattice, but it does not address electron-scale numerical convergence; the sentence "to the extent that the mesh and shape functions are acceptable" explicitly points to an untested assumption. Additionally, the text states that the bore-to-spot ratio Rin/w0 ~ 0.53 was optimized, but no sensitivity scan over this parameter is shown, even though it controls laser guiding and bubble formation. A scan over Rin/w0 (and ideally over the modeled wall thickness) is needed to support the claim that the adopted geometry is robust rather than a finely tuned special case.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] The manuscript uses "TV/m" and "TeV/m" interchangeably (for example, the Introduction and Sections 2.1 and 3); the standard TeV/m will eliminate ambiguity.
  2. [Section 1 (Methods)] In the sentence describing the mesh, "3 × 108 mesh cells" should read "3 × 10^8 mesh cells" for clarity.
  3. [Section 2.1 (Fig. 6 discussion)] The text contains a typo "maximun" (should be "maximum").
  4. [Table 3] The FWHM energy spread is quoted as 105 percent, which is larger than the central energy; consider commenting on the strongly non-monoenergetic character of the bunch when discussing applications.
  5. [Section 3 (Conclusions)] The claim of being the "first numerical demonstration" would benefit from a direct comparison with Refs. [13] and [14] in the conclusions, stating explicitly what is new (infrared driver, self-injection into a bubble, TeV/m gradient) relative to those prior studies.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central acceleration result is emergent from PIC simulation; only a minor non-load-bearing self-citation appears in target design.

full rationale

The central claim, self-injection of an 867.5 pC bunch at 27.9 MeV average energy and 1.86 TeV/m average gradient over 15 micrometers, is an output of the PIConGPU simulations, not a quantity reconstructed from a fitted formula. The effective-density approach of ref. 12 (Bonatto et al., with overlapping authorship) is used to choose a target geometry with ne approximately 10^20 cm^-3 and compatible laser parameters, but the simulated wakefield bubble, electron self-injection, bunch charge, and energy spectrum are emergent from the PIC run rather than imposed by that design input. The quoted gradients (27.9 MeV / 15 micrometers and 63.6 MeV / 15 micrometers) are the paper's own arithmetic definition of average and maximum gradient, not fitted or predicted variables. The self-citation to the effective-density method is minor and not load-bearing for the acceleration result: it is a parameter-selection convenience, and the result stands or falls on the numerical simulation, which is a separate computation. The remaining citations (ref. 13 graphene study, ref. 27 ion-lattice wakefields) are used as literature context or consistency checks and do not supply the central derivation. Therefore no step reduces a prediction to its input by construction; the paper is self-contained in its simulation-based derivation. Any convergence or modeling-fidelity concerns (25 nm mesh, one macroparticle per cell) are correctness risks, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central result depends on several modeling choices: the effective-density design principle from the authors' earlier work, complete six-electron ionization of carbon, negligible ion motion, and PIC fidelity at solid densities with coarse resolution. No new physical entities are introduced. The free parameters are all target/laser choices, not fitted to output data.

free parameters (4)
  • Effective plasma density ne = 1e20 cm^-3
    Chosen by hand so that the plasma-to-laser frequency ratio remains underdense even with full six-electron ionization. This is a design parameter from the effective-density approach, used to select the target geometry.
  • Bore-to-spot ratio Rin/w0 = 0.53
    Described as optimized to maximize bunch energy and charge. No systematic scan or sensitivity analysis is reported.
  • CNT wall modeled thickness = 25 nm
    The target walls are modeled as 25 nm-thick homogeneous carbon tubes. Real CNT walls are about 1 nm, so this is a coarse modeling choice adopted for computational feasibility.
  • Macroparticles per cell = 1
    The simulation uses one macroparticle per 25 nm cell. No convergence study is provided to show this resolves the physics.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The effective-density approach from prior work (ref 12) accurately predicts wakefield behavior in structured CNT targets.
    Used to choose target geometry and laser parameters; the simulation itself does not test this assumption against a homogeneous plasma.
  • domain assumption Carbon atoms in the target are fully ionized (all six valence electrons) by the laser pulse on the timescale of the interaction.
    Section 1 states that ionization advances rapidly and reaches 6 ne in the interaction core, and this is used to justify the underdense condition.
  • ad hoc to paper The PIC code with 25 nm cells and one macroparticle per cell adequately resolves the laser-plasma interaction in solid-density walls.
    Mesh cell size equals the modeled wall thickness, so the wall structure is barely resolved; no convergence test supports this choice.
  • domain assumption Carbon ion motion is negligible over the acceleration time.
    The paper provides its own check in Fig. 8 showing small ion displacement, which supports the assumption for the simulated parameters.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Electron Acceleration in Carbon Nanotubes." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/GDIGHFIG

@misc{pith2026250200183,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Electron Acceleration in Carbon Nanotubes},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/GDIGHFIG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.00183}
}
abstract

Wakefield wavelengths associated with solid-state plasmas greatly limit the accelerating length. An alternative approach employs 2D carbon-based nanomaterials, like graphene or carbon nanotubes (CNTs), configured into structured targets. These nanostructures are designed with voids or low-density regions to effectively reduce the overall plasma density. This reduction enables the use of longer-wavelength lasers and also extends the plasma wavelength and the acceleration length. In this study, we present, to our knowledge, the first numerical demonstration of electron acceleration via self-injection into a wakefield bubble driven by an infrared laser pulse in structured CNT targets, similar to the behavior observed in gaseous plasmas for LWFA in the nonlinear (or bubble) regime. Using the PIConGPU code, bundles of CNTs are modeled in a 3D geometry as 25 nm-thick carbon tubes with an initial density of $10^{22}$ cm$^{-3}$. The carbon plasma is ionized by a three-cycle, 800 nm wavelength laser pulse with a peak intensity of $10^{21}$ W cm$^{-2}$, achieving an effective plasma density of $10^{20}$ cm$^{-3}$. The same laser also drives the wakefield bubble, responsible for the electron self-injection and acceleration. Simulation results indicate that fs-long electron bunches with hundreds of pC charge can be self-injected and accelerated at gradients exceeding 1~TeV$/$m. Both charge and accelerating gradient figures are unprecedented when compared with LWFA in gaseous plasma.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.00183 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a) Schematic of a target based on CNT bundles vertically grown on a substrate with a circular aperture to allow the transmission of laser pulses throught it. (b) Zoomed-in view of the cross-sectional perspective of a CNT bundle. In this article, our study focuses on resonant laser wakefield acceleration (LWFA) in solid-state targets composed of CNT 2/11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a) Cross-sectional view of CNT targets and the corresponding plasma density: (a-b) Transverse view of a target made of 535 CNT bundles randomly distributed in 30 shells with gap of 50 nm between shells, and the corresponding plasma density for each shell and (gray dots) for the whole target (dashed blue line); (c-d) Transverse view of a target made of 546 bundles neatly aligned in 9 shells with a gap of 250 nm betw… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Electron macroparticles shown as gray dots and the longitudinal electric field shown as a colour density plot for the target with constant effective density ne ≃ 1020 cm−3 , considering a laser pulse length ∆t = 8 fs (3 cycles) and intensity I0 = 1021 W/cm2 : (a-b) t/T = 11; (c-d) t/T = 18; (e-f) t/T = 25. achieve the required effective plasma density. This characteristic could offer advantages in terms of fabricati… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) longitudinal, (b) vertical, and (c) horizontal phase spaces at extraction, for a constant effective density of ne ≃ 1020 cm−3 , and a laser pulse with ∆t(FWHM) = 2.67fs, I0 = 1021 W/cm2 and Rin/w0 = 0.53 at t/T = 26. supports the formation of a well-defined wakefie…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Time evolution of the bunch charge Q for two peak laser intensities, I0 = 1020 W/cm2 and I0 = 1021 W/cm2 , shown in femtoseconds and normalized by the laser period T [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Time evolution of the bunch kinetic energy Ekin for two peak laser intensities, I0 = 1020 W/cm2 and I0 = 1021 W/cm2 , shown in femtoseconds and normalized by the laser period T [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The electron bunch shown as an energy-coloured selection of macroparticles in the transverse and axial cut-planes along with the longitudinal electric field Ey at t/T = 10. Magnetic field vectors are shown in the zx-plane, with the macroparticles moving towards the rea…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Synchronous comparison of the electron and carbon charge density in absolute values, with I0 = 1021 W/cm2 , ∆t = 8 fs (3 cycles), with Rin = 0.8 µm, w0 = 1.5 µm at t/T = 20. The on-axis vertical electric field Ex, which comes mostly from the laser, is shown by the soli…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    & Dawson, J

    Tajima, T. & Dawson, J. M. Laser electron accelerator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 267–270, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.43.267 (1979)

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.43.267 1979

  2. [2]

    J., Dawson, J

    Chen, P., Su, J. J., Dawson, J. M., Bane, K. L. & Wilson, P. B. On Energy Transfer in the Plasma Wake Field Accelerator. Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 1252–1255, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.1252 (1986)

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.56.1252 1986

  3. [3]

    Esarey, E., Schroeder, C. B. & Leemans, W. P. Physics of laser-driven plasma-based electron accelerators. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1229–1285, DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1229 (2009)

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.1229 2009

  4. [4]

    Gonsalves, A. et al. Petawatt laser guiding and electron beam acceleration to 8 GeV in a laser-heated capillary discharge waveguide. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 084801, DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.122.084801 (2019)

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.084801 2019

  5. [5]

    D'Arcy, R. et al. FLASHForward: plasma wakefield accelerator science for high-average-power applications. Philos. Transactions Royal Soc. A: Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 377, 20180392, DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2018.0392 (2019)

    work page arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    Labate, L. et al. Toward an effective use of laser-driven very high energy electrons for radiotherapy: Feasibility assessment of multi-field and intensity modulation irradiation schemes. Sci. Reports 10, DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-74256-w (2020)

    doi:10.1038/s41598-020-74256-w 2020

  7. [7]

    Assmann, R. W. et al. Eupraxia conceptual design report. The Eur. Phys. J. Special Top. 229, 3675–4284, DOI: 10.1140/epjst/e2020-000127-8 (2020)

    doi:10.1140/epjst/e2020-000127-8 2020

  8. [8]

    B., Esarey, E., Geddes, C

    Schroeder, C. B., Esarey, E., Geddes, C. G. R., Benedetti, C. & Leemans, W. P. Physics considerations for laser-plasma linear colliders. Phys. Rev. Special Top. - Accel. Beams 13, DOI: 10.1103/physrevstab.13.101301 (2010)

    doi:10.1103/physrevstab.13.101301 2010

Show all 33 references
  1. [9]

    & Leemans, W

    Schroeder, C., Benedetti, C., Esarey, E. & Leemans, W. Laser-plasma-based linear collider using hollow plasma channels. Nucl. Instruments Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A: Accel. Spectrometers, Detect. Assoc. Equip. 829, 113–116, DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2016.03.001 (2016)

    2016 doi

  2. [10]

    Facet-ii facility for advanced accelerator experimental tests

    Yakimenko, V .et al. Facet-ii facility for advanced accelerator experimental tests. Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 22, DOI: 10.1103/physrevaccelbeams.22.101301 (2019)

    2019 doi

  3. [11]

    Laser acceleration in novel media

    Tajima, T. Laser acceleration in novel media. The Eur. Phys. J. Special Top. 223, 1037–1044, DOI: 10.1140/epjst/ e2014-02154-6 (2014)

    2014 doi

  4. [12]

    Bonatto, A. et al. Exploring ultra-high-intensity wakefields in carbon nanotube arrays: An effective plasma-density approach. Phys. Plasmas 30, DOI: 10.1063/5.0134960 (2023)

    2023 doi

  5. [13]

    Author correction: Tev/m catapult acceleration of electrons in graphene layers

    Bon¸ toiu, C.et al. Author correction: Tev/m catapult acceleration of electrons in graphene layers. Sci. Reports 13, DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-29761-z (2023)

    2023 doi

  6. [14]

    Dulat, A. et al. Coherent control of relativistic electron dynamics in plasma nanophotonics. Laser & Photonics Rev. DOI: 10.1002/lpor.202401570 (2024)

    2024 doi

  7. [15]

    Thess, A. et al. Crystalline ropes of metallic carbon nanotubes. Science 273, 483–487, DOI: 10.1126/science.273.5274.483 (1996)

    1996 doi

  8. [16]

    Fedeli, L. et al. Electron acceleration by relativistic surface plasmons in laser-grating interaction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 015001, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.015001 (2016)

    2016 doi

  9. [17]

    & Macchi, A

    Sgattoni, A., Fedeli, L., Cantono, G., Ceccotti, T. & Macchi, A. High field plasmonics and laser-plasma acceleration in solid targets. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 58, 014004, DOI: 10.1088/0741-3335/58/1/014004 (2016)

    2016 doi

  10. [18]

    Sahai, A. A. Nanomaterials based nanoplasmonic accelerators and light-sources driven by particle-beams. IEEE Access 9, 54831, DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3070798 (2021)

    2021

  11. [19]

    Sahai, A. A. et al. Petavolts per meter plasmonics: introducing extreme nanoscience as a route towards scientific frontiers. J. Instrumentation 18, P07019, DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/18/07/P07019 (2023)

    2023 doi

  12. [20]

    Burau, H. et al. Picongpu: A fully relativistic particle-in-cell code for a gpu cluster. IEEE Transactions on Plasma Sci. 38, 2831–2839, DOI: 10.1109/TPS.2010.2064310 (2010)

    2010

  13. [21]

    See, C. H. & Harris, A. T. A review of carbon nanotube synthesis via fluidized-bed chemical vapor deposition,. Ind. I& Eng. Chem. Res. 46, 997 46, 997–1012, DOI: 10.1021/ie060955b (2007)

    2007 doi

  14. [22]

    Sarasini, F. et al. Highly aligned growth of carbon nanotube forests with in-situ catalyst generation: A route to multifunc- tional basalt fibres. Compos. Part B: Eng. 243, 110136, DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110136 (2022). 10/11

    2022

  15. [23]

    Schifano, E. et al. Plasma-etched vertically aligned cnts with enhanced antibacterial power. Nanomaterials 13, 1081, DOI: 10.3390/nano13061081 (2023)

    2023 doi

  16. [24]

    Yadav, R. P.et al. Evaluation of vertical alignment in carbon nanotubes: A quantitative approach. Nucl. Inst. Methods Phys. Res. 1060, 169081, DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2024.169081 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Picksley, A. et al. Guiding of high-intensity laser pulses in 100-mm-long hydrodynamic optical-field-ionized plasma channels. Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams 23, 081303, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.23.081303 (2020)

    2020 doi

  18. [26]

    & Eliezer, S

    Loeb, A. & Eliezer, S. Free-electron laser and laser electron acceleration based on the megagauss magnetic fields in laser-produced plasmas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 2252–2255, DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.2252 (1986)

    1986 doi

  19. [27]

    Hakimi, S. et al. Wakefield in solid state plasma with the ionic lattice force. Phys. Plasmas 25, 023112, DOI: 10.1063/1. 5016445 (2018)

    2018 doi

  20. [28]

    & Goryashko, V

    Salén, P., Opanasenko, A., Perosa, G. & Goryashko, V . State-of-the-art electron beams for compact tools of ultrafast science. Ultramicroscopy DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2024.114080 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    Mittleman, D. M. et al. Recent advances in terahertz imaging. Appl. Phys. B 68, 1085, DOI: 10.1007/s003409900011 (1999)

    1999 doi

  22. [30]

    & Sharma, R

    Singh, M. & Sharma, R. P. Generation of thz radiation by laser plasma interaction. Contrib. Plasma Phys. 53, 540, DOI: 10.1002/ctpp.201300006 (2013)

    2013 doi

  23. [31]

    Brochu, E., Cora, V . M. & de Freitas, N. A tutorial on bayesian optimization of expensive cost functions, with application to active user modeling and hierarchical reinforcement learning (2010). arXiv:1012.2599

    2010 arXiv

  24. [32]

    https://eli-laser.eu

  25. [33]

    Acknowledgements We acknowledge the support received from the PIConGPU software developers and the STFC CDT LIV .DAT under grant agreement ST/P006752/1

    https://www.clpu.es/eu/laser-vega-pw. Acknowledgements We acknowledge the support received from the PIConGPU software developers and the STFC CDT LIV .DAT under grant agreement ST/P006752/1. This work is supported by the Generalitat Valenciana under grant agreement CIDEGENT/20...

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.