REVIEW 1 cited by
Scalable Framework for Classifying AI-Generated Content Across Modalities
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The rapid growth of generative AI technologies has heightened the importance of effectively distinguishing between human and AI-generated content, as well as classifying outputs from diverse generative models. This paper presents a scalable framework that integrates perceptual hashing, similarity measurement, and pseudo-labeling to address these challenges. Our method enables the incorporation of new generative models without retraining, ensuring adaptability and robustness in dynamic scenarios. Comprehensive evaluations on the Defactify4 dataset demonstrate competitive performance in text and image classification tasks, achieving high accuracy across both distinguishing human and AI-generated content and classifying among generative methods. These results highlight the framework's potential for real-world applications as generative AI continues to evolve. Source codes are publicly available at https://github.com/ffyyytt/defactify4.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Hierarchical Document Parsing via Large Margin Feature Matching and Heuristics
By adding an ArcFace-style margin to a CLIP-like matching loss and applying dataset-specific greedy rules, the solution reaches 0.98904 private-leaderboard accuracy on the VRD-IU document hierarchy task.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.