Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 89 references

Effect of 2$^\text{nd}$ harmonic current--phase relation on a behavior of a Josephson Traveling Wave Parametric Amplifier

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A Josephson traveling wave parametric amplifier whose junctions have a second-harmonic current-phase relation can achieve about 13 dB of gain without dispersion engineering, with the optimal harmonic weight near $g = -0.6$.

desk verdict Simulation of JTWPA with second-harmonic CPR is a genuinely new combination with a robust qualitative message, but the quantitative optimum rests on an inconsistent chaos threshold that needs fixing. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.00804 v2 pith:53L4TXVL submitted 2025-02-02 cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.other

Claudio Guarcello , Carlo Barone , Giovanni Carapella , Giovanni Filatrella , Andrea Giachero , Sergio Pagano This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-concond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.other PACS 85.25.Cp74.50.+r05.45.-a
keywords Josephsontravelingwaveparametricamplifiercurrent-phaserelationsecondharmonicgainoptimizationchaospumppowerstabilitysuperconductingqubitreadoutPoincarésections
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Second-harmonic content in a Josephson junction's current-phase relation (the law connecting supercurrent to the phase across the junction) turns out to be a usable amplifier-control knob: a traveling wave parametric amplifier built from junctions with $I(\varphi) = J_{c1}\sin\varphi + J_{c2}\sin 2\varphi$ reaches about 13 dB of gain even when no phase-matching structures are added. The authors simulate a 990-cell Josephson line with realistic qubit-readout parameters and sweep the harmonic ratio $g = J_{c2}/J_{c1}$ while keeping the critical current fixed. They find that negative $g$, particularly $g \approx -0.6$, maximizes the gain but also narrows the pump-power window in which the device stays stable instead of turning chaotic. This suggests that materials-level tuning of the current-phase relation could replace or complement circuit-level phase-matching structures.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the normalized current-phase relation $i(\varphi,g) = [\sin\varphi + g\sin 2\varphi]/\gamma_+(g)$, with $\gamma_+(g)$ given by the analytic formula in Eq.~(7). This normalization isolates the shape of the current-phase relation from the critical current, so that all observed changes in gain and stability are attributed to the harmonic weight $g$ rather than to a trivial rescaling. The supporting machinery is the resistively and capacitively shunted junction model for each of the 990 cells, combined with Poincaré-section and Fourier-spectrum diagnostics that classify the output as stable, periodic, or chaotic. The small-phase expansion of $\gamma(\varphi,g)$ provides the analytic markers at $g=-1/2$ and $g=-1/8$ that coincide with the sharp transitions in device performance.

What would settle it

Build or simulate a set of junctions with different second-harmonic weights but identical critical current (for example, ferromagnetic-barrier junctions with the barrier thickness adjusted to compensate for changes in $g$) and measure gain versus pump power; the paper's claim predicts that the maximum stable gain peaks near $g \approx -0.6$ and that the stable pump window narrows for more negative $g$. Failure to see that peak, or observation of the peak at a different $g$, would falsify the shape-only explanation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery reported here is that the normalized current-phase relation $i(\varphi,g) = [\sin\varphi + g\sin 2\varphi]/\gamma_+(g)$, where $\gamma_+(g)$ is the analytic maximum of $\sin\varphi + g\sin 2\varphi$, acts as an effective control parameter for JTWPA performance. With the critical current fixed at $I_c = 2\,\mu\mathrm{A}$, scanning $g$ over $[-1,1]$ shows that negative $g$ values enhance the signal gain; the maximum stable gain, about 13 dB at a pump power near $-63.5\,\mathrm{dBm}$, occurs at $g \approx -0.6$. In the same scan, the stable pump-power range shrinks as $g$ becomes more negative, with chaotic response appearing for pump powers above roughly $-59.5\,\mathrm{dBm}$. The paper ties these changes to the ground-state structure of the Josephson energy and to the small-phase expansion $\gamma(\varphi,g) \simeq (1+2g)\varphi - (1+8g)\varphi^3$, where sign changes at $g=-1/2$ and $g=-1/8$ mark the sharp transitions in behavior.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the critical current can be held fixed at $2\,\mu\mathrm{A}$ while the harmonic-weight ratio $g$ is varied, so that every change in gain or stability is attributable to the shape of the current-phase relation; if tuning $g$ in a real junction also shifts the critical current, the optimum near $g = -0.6$ could move.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Amplifier designers can treat the harmonic-weight ratio $g$ as a design parameter: setting it near $-0.6$ yields the highest stable gain in the simulated device, so materials that produce a negative second-harmonic term are attractive for JTWPA construction.
  • The stable pump-power window shrinks as $g$ becomes more negative, so a device optimized for maximum gain must also tolerate a narrower operating range; this trade-off is quantified by the gain and $\sigma_{V'_{\mathrm{PS}}}$ maps in the paper.
  • The appearance of a tone at $\nu_{\mathrm{pump}} - \nu_{\mathrm{sign}}$ without any bias current or flux means that the harmonic current-phase relation can supply the symmetry breaking normally required for three-wave mixing, which may be useful for frequency down-conversion.
  • The chaos boundary at pump powers above about $-59.5$ dBm for $g = -0.6$ implies that driving the amplifier too hard does not simply saturate the gain but can push the device into a chaotic state, which would be unusable for quantum readout.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: If the independence of $I_c$ and $g$ holds, then ferromagnetic junctions with tunable barrier properties could let the same amplifier design be reoptimized for gain or stability simply by adjusting the barrier thickness, a knob that is orthogonal to the usual circuit-level phase-matching structures.
  • Inference: The gain map suggests that small positive deviations from a sinusoidal CPR (the $g>0$ region) barely change the gain, so normal fabrication spread in that direction is harmless; the performance-critical direction is negative $g$, which could be monitored as a quality-control metric.
  • Inference: The sharp transitions at $g = -1/2$ and $g = -1/8$ suggest that the ratio of cubic to linear nonlinearity, rather than the raw second-harmonic amplitude, is the controlling quantity; a testable extension would be to plot the gain maximum against the coefficient ratio $(1+8g)/(1+2g)$ and look for a collapse of the data.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript numerically investigates a Josephson traveling wave parametric amplifier (JTWPA) whose junctions obey a current-phase relation I(φ) = Jc1 sin φ + Jc2 sin 2φ. Using the DARTWARS device parameters and fixing the critical current Ic = 2 μA, the authors vary the harmonic weight g = Jc2/Jc1 and compute the output gain, Fourier spectra, phase portraits, and Poincaré-section statistics as functions of pump power. They report that negative g enhances gain, with a maximum stable gain of about 13 dB near g = -0.6 in a device without dispersion engineering, while narrowing the stable pump-power range, and they connect qualitative changes to a small-φ expansion of the CPR.

Significance. If the reported optimum is robust, the work identifies a practical design lever—engineering the second-harmonic content of the CPR—for improving JTWPA gain without dispersion engineering, which is relevant for broadband quantum-limited amplification. Strengths of the paper include direct simulation of a realistic 990-cell transmission line, an analytic small-φ expansion that correctly identifies the special points g = -1/2 and g = -1/8, and a clear presentation of gain maps and dynamical indicators. The manuscript is honest about its numerical nature and provides multimedia supplementary material. The main quantitative claim, however, rests on a chaos/stability threshold that is not specified consistently, so the reported optimum should be treated with caution.

major comments (3)
  1. [Fig. 3 and accompanying text] The threshold separating stable and chaotic responses is not well-defined. The text states that a stable response corresponds to σV'_PS ≪ 0.0189 and a chaotic response to σV'_PS ≳ 0.01, leaving the interval [0.01, 0.0189] undefined, and footnote 89 refers to 'this value' without specifying which value is the threshold. Because the red chaotic regions in Fig. 3(a) and the claim that g ≈ -0.6 gives the maximum stable gain depend on this threshold, the paper should state the exact threshold used and provide a sensitivity analysis demonstrating that the optimum and the narrowing of the stable pump range are robust to its choice.
  2. [Eq. (6) and subsequent small-φ expansion] The expansion γ(φ,g) ≃ (1+2g)φ − (1+8g)φ³ identifies sign changes at g = -1/2 and g = -1/8, but the claimed optimal value g = -0.6 is not one of these points. The sentence 'This threshold value emerges also by expanding...' is unclear: if it refers to the optimal g, the expansion does not predict -0.6; if it refers to the onset of instability, the connection is not demonstrated. The paper should either derive how g = -0.6 arises from the CPR shape or present additional diagnostics that support this specific choice.
  3. [Normalization after Eq. (7)] The authors fix Ic = 2 μA while varying g to isolate the shape of the normalized CPR i(φ,g). This assumes that g can be tuned independently of Ic. In many physical realizations (e.g., SFS junctions where g is controlled by ferromagnetic layer properties), changing g also changes Jc1 and hence Ic. As the authors themselves note, changing Ic affects the plasma frequency and impedance matching. The paper should discuss the validity of this assumption for the junction families cited and, if possible, estimate how correlated variations of Ic with g would shift the optimal g.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Eq. (6) expansion] In the small-φ expansion near Eq. (6), the cubic term should read −(1+8g)φ³/6 rather than −(1+8g)φ³; the missing factor of 1/6 does not affect the sign change at g = -1/8 but should be corrected.
  2. [Footnote 88] Footnote 88 is confusing: 'both Jc1 and Jc2 are to be considered in units of Ic' is not consistent with the earlier definition Jc1 = 1 in Fig. 1 and with the normalization I(φ) = Ic i(φ,g). Please clarify the precise relation between Jc1, Jc2, Ic, and g.
  3. [Fig. 2(b)] In Fig. 2(b) and the text, the three pump-power regimes (i)-(iii) would be easier to follow if the regime boundaries were marked on the figure.
  4. [Text before Fig. 2] The statement 'we will demonstrate in the following that this value of Jc2 maximizes the gain with stable conditions' anticipates a result that is only visually inferred from Fig. 3; consider rephrasing to avoid circularity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the gain and stability maps are direct simulation outputs; self-citations supply device parameters and numerical method, not the conclusions.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is: adopt a CPR with a second harmonic, I(phi)=Jc1 sin(phi)+Jc2 sin(2phi), justified by external literature; normalize to a fixed critical current through i(phi,g)=gamma(phi,g)/gamma+(g); solve the coupled RCSJ equations numerically; and read gain and stability from Fourier transforms, phase portraits, and Poincare-section spreads. The central claim (gain up to about 13 dB with a stability trade-off near g=-0.6) is an output of the simulation scan, not a parameter fitted to a subset of data and then relabeled as a prediction. The small-phi expansion gamma approx (1+2g)phi - (1+8g)phi^3 is an independent analytic remark; it identifies g=-1/2 and g=-1/8 as special points, but it is not used to construct g=-0.6, so the numeric optimum is not definitionally forced. Self-citations (Refs. 8, 31-39, 54) provide the DARTWARS device parameters and the numerical integration/chaos-detection details; these are inputs or methodology, not load-bearing external theorems, and no uniqueness claim is imported from the authors' prior work. The only flagged weakness is the inconsistent stability threshold (text states sigma_V'_PS much less than 0.0189 for stable and sigma_V'_PS greater than or similar to 0.01 for chaotic, with footnote 89 referring to 'this value'), which makes the quantitative stable-region boundary in Fig. 3(b) sensitive to an unspecified criterion; this is a reproducibility/correctness concern, not a circularity, because altering the threshold would change the classification but not make the gain claim equivalent to its input by construction. Overall, no step reduces to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central simulation rests on standard circuit models and parameters from prior device designs. The only hand-set number used to interpret results is the chaos threshold (0.0189). No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • Optimal harmonic weight g_opt = -0.6
    Identified by scanning g in [-1,1] in the numerical gain map (Fig. 3a); it is a data-selected optimum, not predicted by the analytic small-phi expansion.
  • Chaos threshold sigma of V'_PS = 0.0189
    Hand-chosen standard deviation of Poincare-section crossings used to separate stable from chaotic regimes; no sensitivity analysis reported (footnote 89).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The RCSJ model with CJ = 200 fF and RJ = 20 kOhm describes the junction dynamics
    Eq. (1); standard model for Josephson junctions, but parameters are fixed inputs from device design.
  • domain assumption The current-phase relation I(phi) = Jc1 sin(phi) + Jc2 sin(2phi) captures the relevant behavior of unconventional junctions
    Eq. (2); supported by Refs. 55-78, but the paper does not derive this form from a microscopic model.
  • domain assumption A discrete chain of 990 rf-SQUID cells with the given Cg and Lg values is a faithful model of a JTWPA
    Section II; parameters from DARTWARS design (Ref. 8).
  • ad hoc to paper Poincare section standard deviation is a reliable chaos indicator with the chosen threshold
    Section III and footnote 89; no justification beyond visual inspection of maps.
  • standard math The implicit finite-difference scheme with dt = 1e-2 and tmax = 2e4 yields converged steady-state solutions
    Section II; cited to Ref. 54 for details, but no convergence study is shown in this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Effect of 2$^\text{nd}$ harmonic current--phase relation on a behavior of a Josephson Traveling Wave Parametric Amplifier." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/53L4TXVL

@misc{pith2026250200804,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Effect of 2$^\textnd$ harmonic current--phase relation on a behavior of a Josephson Traveling Wave Parametric Amplifier},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/53L4TXVL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.00804}
}
abstract

We numerically investigate the behavior of a Josephson traveling wave parametric amplifier assuming a current-phase relation with a second--harmonic contribution. We find that varying the weight of harmonic terms in the Josephson current affects the gain profile. The analysis of gain characteristics, phase-space portraits, Poincar\'e sections, and Fourier spectra demonstrates that the nonsinusoidal contribution influences the operating mode and stability of the device. In particular, we identify the optimal weighting of harmonic contributions that maximizes amplification, achieving gains up to $\sim 13\;\text{dB}$ in a device without dispersion engineering.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.00804 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (a). Each rf–SQUID consists of one JJ in parallel with an inductor Lg,n = 120 pH. At the input of the transmission line is connected a voltage source, having a standard internal impedance, Ri = 50 Ω, and generating pump and signal voltages, Vpump and Vsign, respectively. The end of the transmission line is connected, through a series capacitance, Cℓ = 1 nF, for DC decoupling, a standard load impedance Rℓ = 50 Ω, acr… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) FT of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) we show the Gain(Ppump, Jc2 ) map: a red region marks parameter combinations that lead to a chaotic response. The value of Jc2 has a significant impact on both the maximum achievable gain and the range of Ppump values within which the system exhibits a non-chaotic behavior. In fact, for Jc2 > 0, the gain shows little variation as Jc2 changes. In contrast, a markedly different response emerges for Jc2 < 0. First,… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

89 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Bartram , author T

    author author C. Bartram , author T. Braine , author R. Cervantes , author N. Crisosto , author N. Du , author G. Leum , author P. Mohapatra , author T. Nitta , author L. J. \ Rosenberg , author G. Rybka , author J. Yang , author J. Clarke , author I. Siddiqi , author A. Agrawal , author A. V. \ Dixit , author M. H. \ Awida , author A. S. \ Chou , author ...

  2. [2]

    Shiri , author H

    author author D. Shiri , author H. Renberg Nilsson , author P. Telluri , author A. F. \ Roudsari , author V. Shumeiko , author C. Fager ,\ and\ author P. Delsing ,\ https://doi.org/10.1109/MMM.2024.3429141 journal journal IEEE Microwave Magazine \ volume 25 ,\ pages 54 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    Citro , author C

    author author R. Citro , author C. Guarcello ,\ and\ author S. Pagano ,\ title Josephson junctions, superconducting circuits, and qubit for quantum technologies ,\ in\ https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-55657-9_1 booktitle New Trends and Platforms for Quantum Technologies ,\ editor edited by\ editor R. Aguado , editor R. Citro , editor M. Lewenstein ,\ and...

    doi:10.1007/978-3-031-55657-9_1

  4. [4]

    Aumentado ,\ https://doi.org/10.1109/MMM.2020.2993476 journal journal IEEE Microwave Magazine \ volume 21 ,\ pages 45 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    author author J. Aumentado ,\ https://doi.org/10.1109/MMM.2020.2993476 journal journal IEEE Microwave Magazine \ volume 21 ,\ pages 45 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    arXiv 2020

  5. [5]

    author author A. Cullen ,\ https://digital-library.theiet.org/content/journals/10.1049/pi-b-2.1960.0085 journal journal Proceedings of the IEE - Part B: Electronic and Communication Engineering \ volume 107 ,\ pages 101 ( year 1960 ) NoStop

    work page arXiv 1960

  6. [6]

    S \"o renssen ,\ https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02923457 journal journal Applied Scientific Research, Section B \ volume 10 ,\ pages 463 ( year 1962 ) NoStop

    author author A. S \"o renssen ,\ https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02923457 journal journal Applied Scientific Research, Section B \ volume 10 ,\ pages 463 ( year 1962 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02923457 1962

  7. [7]

    Esposito , author A

    author author M. Esposito , author A. Ranadive , author L. Planat ,\ and\ author N. Roch ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0064892 journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 119 ,\ pages 120501 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1063/5.0064892 2021

  8. [8]

    Pagano , author C

    author author S. Pagano , author C. Barone , author M. Borghesi , author W. Chung , author G. Carapella , author A. P. \ Caricato , author I. Carusotto , author A. Cian , author D. D. \ Gioacchino , author E. Enrico , author P. Falferi , author L. Fasolo , author M. Faverzani , author E. Ferri , author G. Filatrella , author C. Gatti , author A. Giachero ...

    arXiv

Show all 89 references
  1. [9]

    Bockstiegel , author J

    author author C. Bockstiegel , author J. Gao , author M. R. \ Vissers , author M. Sandberg , author S. Chaudhuri , author A. Sanders , author L. R. \ Vale , author K. D. \ Irwin ,\ and\ author D. P. \ Pappas ,\ https://doi.org/10.1007/s10909-013-1042-z journal journal Journal ...

    doi

  2. [10]

    author author M. R. \ Vissers , author R. P. \ Erickson , author H.-S. \ Ku , author L. Vale , author X. Wu , author G. C. \ Hilton ,\ and\ author D. P. \ Pappas ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4937922 journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 108 ,\ pages 012601 ( year 20...

    doi

  3. [11]

    Chaudhuri , author D

    author author S. Chaudhuri , author D. Li , author K. D. \ Irwin , author C. Bockstiegel , author J. Hubmayr , author J. N. \ Ullom , author M. R. \ Vissers ,\ and\ author J. Gao ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4980102 journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 110 ,\ pages...

    doi

  4. [12]

    Ranzani , author M

    author author L. Ranzani , author M. Bal , author K. C. \ Fong , author G. Ribeill , author X. Wu , author J. Long , author H.-S. \ Ku , author R. P. \ Erickson , author D. Pappas ,\ and\ author T. A. \ Ohki ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5063252 journal journal Applied Physics ...

    doi

  5. [13]

    Malnou , author M

    author author M. Malnou , author M. Vissers , author J. Wheeler , author J. Aumentado , author J. Hubmayr , author J. Ullom ,\ and\ author J. Gao ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.010302 journal journal PRX Quantum \ volume 2 ,\ pages 010302 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    doi

  6. [14]

    Sweeny \ and\ author R

    author author M. Sweeny \ and\ author R. Mahler ,\ https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.1985.1063777 journal journal IEEE Transactions on Magnetics \ volume 21 ,\ pages 654 ( year 1985 ) NoStop

    1985

  7. [15]

    author author M. T. \ Bell \ and\ author A. Samolov ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.4.024014 journal journal Phys. Rev. Appl. \ volume 4 ,\ pages 024014 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  8. [16]

    author author A. B. \ Zorin ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.6.034006 journal journal Phys. Rev. Appl. \ volume 6 ,\ pages 034006 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    2016 doi

  9. [17]

    Fasolo , author A

    author author L. Fasolo , author A. Greco ,\ and\ author E. Enrico ,\ in\ https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89305 booktitle Advances in Condensed-Matter and Materials Physics ,\ editor edited by\ editor J. Thirumalai \ and\ editor S. I. \ Pokutnyi \ ( publisher IntechOpen ,\ ...

    doi

  10. [18]

    Esposito , author A

    author author M. Esposito , author A. Ranadive , author L. Planat , author S. Leger , author D. Fraudet , author V. Jouanny , author O. Buisson , author W. Guichard , author C. Naud , author J. Aumentado , author F. Lecocq ,\ and\ author N. Roch ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/Phys...

    doi

  11. [19]

    O'Brien , author C

    author author K. O'Brien , author C. Macklin , author I. Siddiqi ,\ and\ author X. Zhang ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.157001 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 113 ,\ pages 157001 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  12. [20]

    author author T. C. \ White , author J. Y. \ Mutus , author I.-C. \ Hoi , author R. Barends , author B. Campbell , author Y. Chen , author Z. Chen , author B. Chiaro , author A. Dunsworth , author E. Jeffrey , author J. Kelly , author A. Megrant , author C. Neill , author P. J...

    doi

  13. [21]

    Macklin , author K

    author author C. Macklin , author K. O’Brien , author D. Hover , author M. E. \ Schwartz , author V. Bolkhovsky , author X. Zhang , author W. D. \ Oliver ,\ and\ author I. Siddiqi ,\ https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa8525 journal journal Science \ volume 350 ,\ pages 307 ( ye...

    doi

  14. [22]

    Winkel , author I

    author author P. Winkel , author I. Takmakov , author D. Rieger , author L. Planat , author W. Hasch-Guichard , author L. Gr\"unhaupt , author N. Maleeva , author F. Foroughi , author F. Henriques , author K. Borisov , author J. Ferrero , author A. V. \ Ustinov , author W. Wer...

    doi

  15. [23]

    Planat , author A

    author author L. Planat , author A. Ranadive , author R. Dassonneville , author J. Puertas Mart\' nez , author S. L\'eger , author C. Naud , author O. Buisson , author W. Hasch-Guichard , author D. M. \ Basko ,\ and\ author N. Roch ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.10.021021...

    doi

  16. [24]

    Gaydamachenko , author C

    author author V. Gaydamachenko , author C. Kissling , author R. Dolata ,\ and\ author A. B. \ Zorin ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0111111 journal journal Journal of Applied Physics \ volume 132 ,\ pages 154401 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022 doi

  17. [25]

    Fadavi Roudsari , author D

    author author A. Fadavi Roudsari , author D. Shiri , author H. Renberg Nilsson , author G. Tancredi , author A. Osman , author I.-M. \ Svensson , author M. Kudra , author M. Rommel , author J. Bylander , author V. Shumeiko ,\ and\ author P. Delsing ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/5...

    doi

  18. [26]

    author author J. Y. \ Qiu , author A. Grimsmo , author K. Peng , author B. Kannan , author B. Lienhard , author Y. Sung , author P. Krantz , author V. Bolkhovsky , author G. Calusine , author D. Kim , author A. Melville , author B. M. \ Niedzielski , author J. Yoder , author M...

    doi

  19. [27]

    Rizvanov , author S

    author author E. Rizvanov , author S. Kern , author P. Neilinger ,\ and\ author M. Grajcar ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0236927 journal journal Journal of Applied Physics \ volume 136 ,\ pages 174401 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  20. [28]

    Carbone , author M

    author author A. Carbone , author M. Gilli , author P. Mazzetti ,\ and\ author L. Ponta ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3525984 journal journal Journal of Applied Physics \ volume 108 ,\ pages 123916 ( year 2010 ) NoStop

    2010 doi

  21. [29]

    author author M. L. \ Thompson , author M. Castellanos-Beltran , author P. F. \ Hopkins , author P. D. \ Dresselhaus ,\ and\ author S. P. \ Benz ,\ https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2022.3223853 journal journal IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity \ volume 33 ,\ pages 1 (...

    2022

  22. [30]

    author author A. G. P. \ Troeman , author S. H. W. \ van der Ploeg , author E. Il'Ichev , author H.-G. \ Meyer , author A. A. \ Golubov , author M. Y. \ Kupriyanov ,\ and\ author H. Hilgenkamp ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.77.024509 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume ...

    doi

  23. [31]

    Guarcello , author G

    author author C. Guarcello , author G. Avallone , author C. Barone , author M. Borghesi , author S. Capelli , author G. Carapella , author A. P. \ Caricato , author I. Carusotto , author A. Cian , author D. Di Gioacchino , author E. Enrico , author P. Falferi , author L. Fasol...

  24. [32]

    Guarcello , author F

    author author C. Guarcello , author F. Ahrens , author G. Avallone , author C. Barone , author M. Borghesi , author L. Callegaro , author G. Carapella , author A. P. \ Caricato , author I. Carusotto , author A. Cian , author A. D'Elia , author D. D. \ Gioacchino , author E. En...

  25. [33]

    Giachero , author C

    author author A. Giachero , author C. Barone , author M. Borghesi , author G. Carapella , author A. P. \ Caricato , author I. Carusotto , author W. Chang , author A. Cian , author D. D. \ Gioacchino , author E. Enrico , author P. Falferi , author L. Fasolo , author M. Faverzan...

  26. [34]

    Granata , author G

    author author V. Granata , author G. Avallone , author C. Barone , author M. Borghesi , author S. Capelli , author G. Carapella , author A. P. \ Caricato , author I. Carusotto , author A. Cian , author D. Di Gioacchino , author E. Enrico , author P. Falferi , author L. Fasolo ...

  27. [35]

    Borghesi , author C

    author author M. Borghesi , author C. Barone , author M. Borghesi , author S. Capelli , author G. Carapella , author A. Caricato , author I. Carusotto , author A. Cian , author D. Di Gioacchino , author E. Enrico , author P. Falferi , author L. Fasolo , author M. Faverzani , a...

  28. [36]

    Rettaroli , author C

    author author A. Rettaroli , author C. Barone , author M. Borghesi , author S. Capelli , author G. Carapella , author A. Caricato , author I. Carusotto , author A. Cian , author D. Di Gioacchino , author E. Enrico , author P. Falferi , author L. Fasolo , author M. Faverzani , ...

  29. [37]

    Fasolo , author F

    author author L. Fasolo , author F. Ahrens , author G. Avallone , author C. Barone , author M. Borghesi , author L. Callegaro , author G. Carapella , author A. P. \ Caricato , author I. Carusotto , author A. Cian , author A. D'Elia , author D. D. \ Gioacchino , author P. Falfe...

  30. [38]

    Ahrens , author E

    author author F. Ahrens , author E. Ferri , author G. Avallone , author C. Barone , author M. Borghesi , author L. Callegaro , author G. Carapella , author A. P. \ Caricato , author I. Carusotto , author A. Cian , author A. D'Elia , author D. D. \ Gioacchino , author E. Enrico...

  31. [39]

    Faverzani , author P

    author author M. Faverzani , author P. Campana , author R. Carobene , author M. Gobbo , author F. Ahrens , author G. Avallone , author C. Barone , author M. Borghesi , author S. Capelli , author G. Carapella , author A. P. \ Caricato , author L. Callegaro , author I. Carusotto...

  32. [40]

    author author A. L. \ Pankratov ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2839605 journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 92 ,\ pages 082504 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    2008 doi

  33. [41]

    author author A. L. \ Pankratov , author E. V. \ Pankratova , author V. A. \ Shamporov ,\ and\ author S. V. \ Shitov ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4978514 journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 110 ,\ pages 112601 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    doi

  34. [42]

    author author W. C. \ Stewart ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1651991 journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 12 ,\ pages 277 ( year 1968 ) NoStop

    1968 doi

  35. [43]

    author author D. E. \ McCumber ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1656743 journal journal Journal of Applied Physics \ volume 39 ,\ pages 3113 ( year 1968 ) NoStop

    1968 doi

  36. [44]

    Barone \ and\ author G

    author author A. Barone \ and\ author G. Patern\` o ,\ @noop title Physics and Applications of the Josephson Effect \ ( publisher Wiley, New York ,\ year 1982 ) NoStop

    1982

  37. [45]

    Piedjou Komnang , author C

    author author A. Piedjou Komnang , author C. Guarcello , author C. Barone , author C. Gatti , author S. Pagano , author V. Pierro , author A. Rettaroli ,\ and\ author G. Filatrella ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110496 journal journal Chaos, Solitons &...

  38. [46]

    Guarcello , author A

    author author C. Guarcello , author A. S. \ Piedjou Komnang , author C. Barone , author A. Rettaroli , author C. Gatti , author S. Pagano ,\ and\ author G. Filatrella ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.16.054015 journal journal Phys. Rev. Appl. \ volume 16 ,\ pages 0540...

    doi

  39. [47]

    Grimaudo , author D

    author author R. Grimaudo , author D. Valenti , author B. Spagnolo , author G. Filatrella ,\ and\ author C. Guarcello ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.033007 journal journal Phys. Rev. D \ volume 105 ,\ pages 033007 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    doi

  40. [48]

    author author P. S. \ Lomdahl , author O. H. \ Soerensen ,\ and\ author P. L. \ Christiansen ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.25.5737 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 25 ,\ pages 5737 ( year 1982 ) NoStop

    1982 doi

  41. [49]

    author author K. G. \ Fedorov , author A. L. \ Pankratov ,\ and\ author B. Spagnolo ,\ https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218127408022111 journal journal International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos \ volume 18 ,\ pages 2857 ( year 2008 ) NoStop

    doi

  42. [50]

    Guarcello , author P

    author author C. Guarcello , author P. Solinas , author A. Braggio ,\ and\ author F. Giazotto ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30268-1 journal journal Scientific Reports \ volume 8 ,\ pages 12287 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    2018 doi

  43. [51]

    Guarcello ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111531 journal journal Chaos, Solitons & Fractals \ volume 153 ,\ pages 111531 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    author author C. Guarcello ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111531 journal journal Chaos, Solitons & Fractals \ volume 153 ,\ pages 111531 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    2021

  44. [52]

    Guarcello , author S

    author author C. Guarcello , author S. Pagano ,\ and\ author G. Filatrella ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0211230 journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 124 ,\ pages 162601 ( year 2024 b ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  45. [53]

    Guarcello , author G

    author author C. Guarcello , author G. Filatrella , author D. De Santis , author B. Spagnolo ,\ and\ author D. Valenti ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115421 journal journal Chaos, Solitons & Fractals \ volume 187 ,\ pages 115421 ( year 2024 c ) NoStop

    2024

  46. [54]

    Guarcello , author C

    author author C. Guarcello , author C. Barone , author G. Carapella , author V. Granata , author G. Filatrella , author A. Giachero ,\ and\ author S. Pagano ,\ https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2024.115598 journal journal Chaos, Solitons Fractals \ volume 189 ,\ ...

    2024

  47. [55]

    author author Y. S. \ Barash , author I. V. \ Bobkova ,\ and\ author Y. A. \ Krotov ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.52.665 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 52 ,\ pages 665 ( year 1995 ) NoStop

    1995 doi

  48. [56]

    Tanaka \ and\ author S

    author author Y. Tanaka \ and\ author S. Kashiwaya ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.53.R11957 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 53 ,\ pages R11957 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    1996 doi

  49. [57]

    Buzdin \ and\ author A

    author author A. Buzdin \ and\ author A. E. \ Koshelev ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.67.220504 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 67 ,\ pages 220504(R) ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    2003 doi

  50. [58]

    Goldobin , author D

    author author E. Goldobin , author D. Koelle , author R. Kleiner ,\ and\ author A. Buzdin ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.76.224523 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 76 ,\ pages 224523 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    2007 doi

  51. [59]

    Goldobin , author H

    author author E. Goldobin , author H. Sickinger , author M. Weides , author H. Kohlstedt , author R. Kleiner ,\ and\ author D. Koelle ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.227001 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 107 ,\ pages 227001 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    doi

  52. [60]

    Pal , author Z

    author author A. Pal , author Z. H. \ Barber , author J. W. A. \ Robinson ,\ and\ author M. G. \ Blamire ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4340 journal journal Nature Communications \ volume 5 ,\ pages 3340 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014 doi

  53. [61]

    Goldobin , author D

    author author E. Goldobin , author D. Koelle , author R. Kleiner ,\ and\ author R. G. \ Mints ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.91.214511 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 91 ,\ pages 214511 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015 doi

  54. [62]

    Sickinger , author A

    author author H. Sickinger , author A. Lipman , author M. Weides , author H. Kohlstedt , author H. Kohlstedt , author D. Koelle , author R. Kleiner ,\ and\ author E. Goldobin ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.107002 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 109...

    doi

  55. [63]

    Menditto , author H

    author author R. Menditto , author H. Sickinger , author M. Weides , author H. Kohlstedt , author D. Koelle , author R. Kleiner ,\ and\ author E. Goldobin ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.94.042202 journal journal Phys. Rev. E \ volume 94 ,\ pages 042202 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    doi

  56. [64]

    author author M. J. A. \ Stoutimore , author A. J. \ Vick , author M. A. \ Khasawneh , author P. S. \ Carney ,\ and\ author N. O. \ Birge ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.177702 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 121 ,\ pages 177702 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    doi

  57. [65]

    Baumgartner , author L

    author author C. Baumgartner , author L. Fuchs , author A. Costa , author J. Picó-Cortés , author S. Reinhardt , author S. Gronin , author G. C. \ Gardner , author T. Lindemann , author M. J. \ Manfra , author P. E. \ Faria Junior , author D. Kochan , author J. Fabian , author...

    doi

  58. [66]

    Pal , author A

    author author B. Pal , author A. Chakraborty , author P. K. \ Sivakumar , author M. Davydova , author A. K. \ Gopi , author A. K. \ Pandeya , author J. A. \ Krieger , author Y. Zhang , author M. Date , author S. Ju , author N. Yuan , author N. B. M. \ Schr \"o ter , author L. ...

    doi

  59. [67]

    author author P. K. \ Sivakumar , author M. T. \ Ahari , author J.-K. \ Kim , author Y. Wu , author A. Dixit , author G. J. \ de Coster , author A. K. \ Pandeya , author M. J. \ Gilbert ,\ and\ author S. S. P. \ Parkin ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-024-01825-0 journal jour...

    doi

  60. [68]

    Zhang , author A

    author author P. Zhang , author A. Zarassi , author L. Jarjat , author V. V. \ de Sande , author M. Pendharkar , author J. S. \ Lee , author C. P. \ Dempsey , author A. P. \ McFadden , author S. D. \ Harrington , author J. T. \ Dong , author H. Wu , author A. H. \ Chen , autho...

    doi

  61. [69]

    Leblanc , author C

    author author A. Leblanc , author C. Tangchingchai , author Z. S. \ Momtaz , author E. Kiyooka , author J.-M. \ Hartmann , author G. T. \ Fernandez-Bada , author Z. Scher\"ubl , author B. Brun , author V. Schmitt , author S. Zihlmann , author R. Maurand , author E. Dumur , aut...

    doi

  62. [70]

    Ciaccia , author R

    author author C. Ciaccia , author R. Haller , author A. C. C. \ Drachmann , author T. Lindemann , author M. J. \ Manfra , author C. Schrade ,\ and\ author C. Sch \"o nenberger ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-024-01531-x journal journal Communications Physics \ volume 7 ,\ pa...

    doi

  63. [71]

    Valentini , author O

    author author M. Valentini , author O. Sagi , author L. Baghumyan , author T. de Gijsel , author J. Jung , author S. Calcaterra , author A. Ballabio , author J. Aguilera Servin , author K. Aggarwal , author M. Janik , author T. Adletzberger , author R. Seoane Souto , author M....

    doi

  64. [72]

    Leblanc , author C

    author author A. Leblanc , author C. Tangchingchai , author Z. S. \ Momtaz , author E. Kiyooka , author J.-M. \ Hartmann , author F. Gustavo , author J.-L. \ Thomassin , author B. Brun , author V. Schmitt , author S. Zihlmann , author R. Maurand , author E. Dumur , author S. D...

    2024 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Zhang , author Z

    author author B. Zhang , author Z. Li , author V. Aguilar , author P. Zhang , author M. Pendharkar , author C. Dempsey , author J. S. \ Lee , author S. D. \ Harrington , author S. Tan , author J. S. \ Meyer , author M. Houzet , author C. J. \ Palmstrom ,\ and\ author S. M. \ F...

    doi

  66. [74]

    Messelot , author N

    author author S. Messelot , author N. Aparicio , author E. de Seze , author E. Eyraud , author J. Coraux , author K. Watanabe , author T. Taniguchi ,\ and\ author J. Renard ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.106001 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 133 ,\ pages...

    doi

  67. [75]

    Il'ichev , author V

    author author E. Il'ichev , author V. Zakosarenko , author R. P. J. \ IJsselsteijn , author H. E. \ Hoenig , author H.-G. \ Meyer , author M. V. \ Fistul ,\ and\ author P. M\"uller ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.59.11502 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 59 ,\ pages 1...

    doi

  68. [76]

    Il'ichev , author V

    author author E. Il'ichev , author V. Zakosarenko , author R. P. J. \ IJsselsteijn , author H. E. \ Hoenig , author V. Schultze , author H.-G. \ Meyer , author M. Grajcar ,\ and\ author R. Hlubina ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.60.3096 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volum...

    doi

  69. [77]

    u nzler , author S. Ihssen , author P. Paluch , author T. Reisinger , author R. Hanna , author J. H. \ Bae , author P. Sch \

    author author D. Willsch , author D. Rieger , author P. Winkel , author M. Willsch , author C. Dickel , author J. Krause , author Y. Ando , author R. Lescanne , author Z. Leghtas , author N. T. \ Bronn , author P. Deb , author O. Lanes , author Z. K. \ Minev , author B. Dennig...

  70. [78]

    \ Sun , author S.-B

    author author H.-P. \ Sun , author S.-B. \ Zhang , author C.-A. \ Li ,\ and\ author B. Trauzettel ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.19413 title Tunable second-order josephson response in altermagnets ( year 2024 ),\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.19413 arXiv:2407.19413 [cond-mat.supr-...

    2024 arXiv

  71. [79]

    author author N. O. \ Birge \ and\ author N. Satchell ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0195229 journal journal APL Materials \ volume 12 ,\ pages 041105 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024 doi

  72. [80]

    author author A. A. \ Golubov , author M. Y. \ Kupriyanov ,\ and\ author E. Il'ichev ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.76.411 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 76 ,\ pages 411 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    2004 doi

  73. [81]

    author author V. V. \ Ryazanov , author V. A. \ Oboznov , author A. Y. \ Rusanov , author A. V. \ Veretennikov , author A. A. \ Golubov ,\ and\ author J. Aarts ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.2427 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 86 ,\ pages 2427 ( year 2001...

    doi

  74. [82]

    author author D. J. \ Van Harlingen ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.67.515 journal journal Rev. Mod. Phys. \ volume 67 ,\ pages 515 ( year 1995 ) NoStop

    1995 doi

  75. [83]

    author author J. R. \ Kirtley , author C. C. \ Tsuei ,\ and\ author K. A. \ Moler ,\ https://doi.org/10.1126/science.285.5432.1373 journal journal Science \ volume 285 ,\ pages 1373 ( year 1999 ) NoStop

    1999

  76. [84]

    Kontos , author M

    author author T. Kontos , author M. Aprili , author J. Lesueur ,\ and\ author X. Grison ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.304 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 86 ,\ pages 304 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

    2001 doi

  77. [85]

    author author I. I. \ Soloviev , author V. I. \ Ruzhickiy , author S. V. \ Bakurskiy , author N. V. \ Klenov , author M. Y. \ Kupriyanov , author A. A. \ Golubov , author O. V. \ Skryabina ,\ and\ author V. S. \ Stolyarov ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.16.014052 jou...

    doi

  78. [86]

    Jabbari , author M

    author author T. Jabbari , author M. Bocko ,\ and\ author E. G. \ Friedman ,\ https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2023.3260774 journal journal IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity \ volume 33 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    2023

  79. [87]

    Takeshita , author F

    author author Y. Takeshita , author F. Li , author M. Higashi , author M. Tanaka , author T. Yamashita ,\ and\ author A. Fujimaki ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/acb38d journal journal Superconductor Science and Technology \ volume 36 ,\ pages 045004 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    doi

  80. [88]

    note From here on, both J_ c_1 and J_ c_2 are to be considered in units of I_c=2 + .2777em A NoStop

  81. [89]

    note This value of the V'_ PS --standard deviation, _ V'_ PS , is used through the text as the threshold to distinguish stable from chaotic responses. NoStop

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.