Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 139 references

Revisiting Propagation Delays of Ultra-High-Energy Cosmic Rays from Long-lived Sources

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Propagation delays of ultra-high-energy cosmic rays can reach millions of years, comparable to or longer than the duty cycles of active galaxies, so the sources active today need not be the ones producing the detected particles.

desk verdict Useful atlas of UHECR delay maps, but the headline claim is borrowed and the large-delay region leans on an ambiguous small-scale scattering correction that needs code release or a benchmark. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.01022 v3 pith:BVOFXSIG submitted 2025-02-03 astro-ph.HE

Rostom Mbarek , Damiano Caprioli This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords ultra-high-energycosmicrayspropagationtimedelaysextragalacticmagneticfieldsAGNdutycyclesrayanisotropiesphotodisintegrationhorizon
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Ultra-high-energy cosmic rays (UHECRs) do not travel in straight lines: magnetic fields bend their paths, so a particle detected today may have been emitted long ago by a source whose active phase has since ended. This paper tests how long that delay can be across a wide range of magnetic field strengths, coherence lengths, and particle rigidities, including energy losses from photodisintegration. It finds that delays can easily be comparable to—and often longer than—the multi-million-year duty cycles of active galactic nuclei and starburst galaxies, so the sources of today's UHECRs need not be the sources that are active now. If true, UHECR arrival-direction anisotropies cannot be naively matched to current active galaxy positions, and the measured chemical composition becomes a tool for constraining extragalactic magnetic fields.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the dimensionless delay map of $t_d/t_b$ as a function of $R/D$ and $\ell_c/D$, where $t_d=t-t_b$ is the extra propagation time and $t_b$ the ballistic (photon) time. The transport is integrated with a charged-particle pusher in a magnetic field whose direction changes by a Gaussian random walk of width $\pi/2$ every coherence length $\ell_c$; the mean free path is written $\lambda \sim \ell_c^{1-\delta}R^\delta$ with $\delta=2$ for $R>\ell_c$ and $\delta\simeq0.3$ for $R<\ell_c$, and the small-scale scattering is captured by augmenting the path length by $(\ell_c/R)^\delta$. These maps convert field strength and coherence length into time delays, deflections, and magnetic horizons, and are the machinery from which the astrophysical conclusions follow.

What would settle it

A concrete check is to propagate identical particle distributions through a full magnetohydrodynamic turbulence simulation with a realistic inertial range and see whether cluster-like fields ($B\sim0.1$--$1\,\mu$G, $\ell_c\sim100$ pc--10 kpc) still give delays of $10^5$--$10^7$ yr at rigidity $5\times10^{18}$ V; if not, the quantitative conclusion fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is a set of delay maps over the parameter space of Larmor radius $R$ and magnetic coherence length $\ell_c$, normalized to source distance $D$, computed by propagating particles in a magnetic field whose direction performs a Gaussian random walk every coherence length. Four transport regions emerge: near-ballistic propagation for $R>D$; a coherent 'cosmic highway' for $\ell_c>D$ where delays still reach about $0.7\,t_b$ for oblique pitch angles; scattering with small delays for $\ell_c<R<D$; and a diffusive region $R<\ell_c<D$ where $t_d/t_b \gtrsim 10^3$. For the highest plausible rigidity $\rho_{\max}=5\times10^{18}$ V, propagation through a Mpc-scale cluster with $B\sim1\,\mu$G produces delays that exceed AGN duty cycles of $10^5$--$10^7$ yr, and even a 3.5 Mpc path with $\ell_c>10^4$ pc and $B>1$ nG yields delays near 1 Myr. The paper concludes that UHECR delays can erase the correlation between arrival directions and known active galactic nuclei, and uses photodisintegration losses to show how the detected composition constrains the field's strength and coherence length.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that extragalactic magnetic turbulence is well described by a single coherence length with random direction changes and a small-scale path-length correction, a simplification the paper does not validate against full magnetohydrodynamic turbulence simulations.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • UHECR anisotropy analyses that correlate arrival directions with active galactic nuclei or starburst catalogs will see reduced or erased signals unless the sources' past activity over the last ~1--100 Myr is modeled.
  • For a source like Centaurus A, delays of order Myr mean today's low jet power does not directly constrain the luminosity that produced the arriving UHECRs, so source-efficiency estimates carry a large uncertainty from the unknown past activity.
  • Longer delays increase the path length and therefore photodisintegration, so detecting intact iron-like nuclei from a known distance would place an upper limit on the average strength of extragalactic magnetic fields.
  • CNO primaries from Centaurus A appear viable for $B\sim0.1$--$1\,\mu$G and $\ell_c\lesssim10^4$ pc, while CNO secondaries from iron parents would require unrealistically strong fields.
  • Magnetic horizons--distances beyond which delays approach the age of the Universe--impose a low-energy cutoff and deplete heavy elements, consistent with the light composition observed at $E\lesssim10^{18}$ eV.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves implicit that anisotropy catalog analyses should weight sources by their time-integrated activity over the propagation delay, not by their current luminosity.
  • A testable extension is to use the delay maps together with measured composition as a tomographic probe of the line-of-sight product of field strength and coherence length.
  • The logic extends to any episodic source class with duty cycles shorter than the computed delay, so a null correlation with currently active AGNs should not be read as evidence against AGN origins.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies the time delay accumulated by ultra-high-energy cosmic rays (UHECRs) propagating over cosmological distances, using a simplified magnetic-field model in which the field direction undergoes a random walk every coherence length ℓc and particles are tracked with a Boris pusher. The authors scan a wide range of Larmor radii R and coherence lengths ℓc, add an analytic augmentation for R<ℓc, and include photodisintegration and photomeson losses. They conclude that propagation delays can be comparable to or longer than AGN duty cycles of 10^5–10^7 yr, which would erase correlations between known AGNs and UHECR anisotropies, and they discuss how composition measurements could constrain extragalactic magnetic fields.

Significance. If the delay maps are reliable, the qualitative conclusion is important: UHECR anisotropy studies must consider propagation delays even for long-lived sources, not only for transients. The paper also provides a useful framework for connecting composition measurements to extragalactic magnetic-field parameters, and the main claim is appropriately hedged with 'could easily'. The strength of the paper is its broad parameter scan and the explicit recognition of the small-scale transport limitation; the chief uncertainty is that the largest delays in Region d rest on an analytic augmentation whose implementation is not fully specified and not validated against a turbulence benchmark.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2.2, Eq. (1)] The augmentation factor (ℓc/R)^δ is ambiguous as to what quantity it multiplies. If it multiplies the straight-line distance D, the resulting path length is D(ℓc/R)^δ, whereas a diffusive random walk with mean free path λ=ℓc^{1−δ}R^δ gives a path length D^2/λ = D(D/ℓc)(ℓc/R)^δ for the same net displacement; the two expressions differ by the large factor D/ℓc exactly in Region d (R<ℓc<D). If instead the factor multiplies the simulated path length, which already scales as D^2/ℓc, the standard diffusive result is recovered, and the wording 'a particle traveling a distance of ∼ℓc' supports this reading. The manuscript should state explicitly which quantity is augmented, and ideally validate the Region d map against a synthetic-turbulence or analytic diffusion benchmark. The robustness scan δ∈[0.2,0.6] does not test this structural point.
  2. [Section 2.1 and Figure 1] The transport model is not quantitatively benchmarked. The text states that agreement 'with the trends' of Casse et al. (2001) and Plotnikov et al. (2011) was found, but no comparison plot or numerical measure is provided. Because the synthetic field contains structure only at the single scale ℓc and the largest delays are quoted from the interpolated Region d, the fidelity of the delay maps should be established against known diffusion coefficients in synthetic turbulence (or against CRPropa with the same field) before the quantitative maps are used in Sections 4 and 5.
  3. [Section 5.2 and Figure 4] The composition constraints from Centaurus A are derived directly from the total traveled distance dtot, which is inherited from the delay maps. If the §2.2 augmentation is implemented as multiplying the straight-line distance rather than the simulated path length, the reported dtot would be underestimated by D/ℓc, and the allowed region for primary CNO (B∼0.1–1 μG, ℓc≤10^4 pc) would shrink correspondingly. The paper should state the sensitivity of Figure 4 to the augmentation convention and to the choice of δ.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 3, Region b] The coherent-field delay estimate appears inconsistent with standard uniform-field transport. For pitch angle μ, the time delay should be td/tb = 1/μ − 1, which is 0.414 for μ=cos(π/4), not 0.7 as quoted. The formula d≈D sqrt(μ^2+1)/μ^2 is not derived and seems to describe a different geometry; please clarify the definition of μ and the field alignment.
  2. [Section 2.1] The phrase 'the ratio of perpendicular to parallel diffusion falls as (R/D)^−2' is unclear; the dimensionless ratio should depend on R/ℓc rather than R/D, and the sign of the exponent should be checked.
  3. [Section 2.3] In the photodisintegration description, 'another specie' should be 'another species'.
  4. [General] The simulation code is not released. Given the ambiguity in §2.2 and the novelty of the transport prescription, releasing the code or a detailed pseudocode description would significantly aid reproducibility.
  5. [Abstract and Section 2] The abstract's phrase 'different magnetic field configurations' is not accurate; the paper uses one field model (random-walk direction at ℓc) with varying parameters. Consider rephrasing.
  6. [Section 4.2] The statement that the maximum delays from source regions around 100 kpc are 'a few Myr' may be inconsistent with Figure 1 if td/tb∼10^3 in Region d; please check the estimate.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: delays are computed from a propagation model and external duty-cycle estimates; self-citations are ancillary.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The delay maps in Figures 1 and 2 are produced by a Boris-pusher simulation with a prescribed random-walk magnetic field (Section 2), not fitted to AGN duty cycles or anisotropy data. The small-scale correction in Section 2.2 is an explicit model assumption that quantifies resonant and intermittent scattering through a mean free path lambda ~ lc^(1-delta) R^delta; even though the largest Region d delays rest on this augmentation, it is an input assumption, not the target conclusion, and the delta-scan in [0.2, 0.6] does not make the conclusion equivalent to the input. AGN duty cycles are taken from external observational estimates in Section 1.1. Self-citations (Mbarek and Caprioli 2019, 2021; Mbarek et al. 2023, 2025) support cocoon isotropization, GDR mean free paths, and Cen A scenarios, but these are ancillary and independently benchmarked: transport trends are checked against Casse et al. (2001) and Plotnikov et al. (2011), and GDR calculations are compared with SimProp and CRPropa. No equation in the paper reduces to its own input by construction, and no fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction. The main quantitative caveat, namely the possible ambiguity in how the (lc/R)^delta path-length augmentation is applied in the diffusive regime, is a modeling-risk concern rather than a circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on a simplified single-scale turbulence model, a broad input grid for B and ℓc, standard loss physics, and external estimates of AGN duty cycles. The ad hoc (ℓc/R)^δ correction is the most consequential input because it produces the largest delays. No new particles, forces, or conserved quantities are introduced.

free parameters (6)
  • δ (small-scale scattering exponent, R < ℓc) = 0.2 to 0.6, nominal 0.3
    Controls the augmentation factor (ℓc/R)^δ that sets the magnitude of delays in the diffusive regime; chosen from intermittency literature rather than measured.
  • δ (large-scale scattering exponent, R > ℓc) = 2
    Sets λ ∼ ℓc^{1-δ} R^δ for R > ℓc; taken from quasilinear transport results and checked against Casse et al. 2001 and Plotnikov et al. 2011.
  • Magnetic field strength B = scanned 1e-9 to 1e-5 G
    Input grid spanning observational bounds; the conclusion that delays exceed duty cycles comes from the higher-B portion of this grid.
  • Coherence length ℓc = scanned 1 pc to 1 Mpc
    Input grid; large delays are found mainly for ℓc > 100 kpc or in the diffusive regime with R < ℓc.
  • Magnetic bend angle σ = π/2
    Assumes strong turbulence, δB/B ~ 1; a different bend angle would change the diffusion coefficient.
  • Initial pitch angle μ = cos(π/4) for most runs
    Injection geometry; only affects delays when ℓc > D (Region b).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Magnetic turbulence is represented by a Gaussian random walk of field direction with standard deviation π/2 every coherence length ℓc, with constant |B|.
    Section 2; this single-scale model replaces a full MHD turbulence spectrum and is the core of the transport calculation.
  • ad hoc to paper For R < ℓc, small-scale resonant scattering and intermittency are included by multiplying the propagation distance by (ℓc/R)^δ, with δ between 0.2 and 0.6.
    Section 2.2; this correction is the main driver of the large delays in Region d and is not directly simulated in this paper.
  • domain assumption AGN duty cycles are of order 10^5 to 10^7 yr.
    Section 1.1; based on transverse proximity effect, ionized nebulae, and quasar clustering observations quoted from the literature.
  • domain assumption UHECRs at the highest energies are heavy nuclei, roughly CNO and Fe.
    Sections 5.1 and 5.2; based on Auger composition measurements cited in the paper.
  • standard math Photodisintegration proceeds through the Giant Dipole Resonance, and the target photon fields are CMB, CIB, and COB from Dole et al. 2006.
    Section 2.3; standard nuclear and photon background physics taken from prior work.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Revisiting Propagation Delays of Ultra-High-Energy Cosmic Rays from Long-lived Sources." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BVOFXSIG

@misc{pith2026250201022,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Revisiting Propagation Delays of Ultra-High-Energy Cosmic Rays from Long-lived Sources},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BVOFXSIG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.01022}
}
read the original abstract

We revisit the time delay incurred during ultra-high energy cosmic ray (UHECR) propagation over cosmological distances and its potential impact on the correlation between UHECR directions of arrival and long-lived sources (i.e., with duty cycles of order of Myr, such as Active Galactic Nuclei (AGNs) and starburst galaxies), the UHECR chemical composition, and extragalactic magnetic field constraints. We propagate particles in different magnetic field configurations, spanning over an extended range of particle Larmor radii and magnetic field coherence lengths, also including attenuation losses. We conclude that UHECR delays could easily be comparable to (and longer than) AGN duty cycles, effectively erasing the correlation between known AGNs and UHECR anisotropies. We finally consider how strong constraints on the chemical composition of the heaviest UHECRs could enable a better characterization of extragalactic magnetic fields.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.01022 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Time delay maps of particle propagation as a function of the particle Larmor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Time delay map td(yr) as a function of the coherence length ℓc(pc) and the B-field B(G) that UHECRs with rigidity ρmax = E/Z = 5 × 1018V probe over different distances as specified. Particles are initialized with µ = cos π/4, though the dependence on µ is minimal. The right panel corresponds to the distance to the nearest jetted AGN, Centaurus A. 4.1. General Considerations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Upper Panel: Mean free path λA for one photodisintegration interaction with CMB+COB+CIB due to the GDR for different species. Dashed lines represent the max￾imum UHECR energy 5Z × 1018eV. Dotted lines represent the contribution of the CMB only. Lower Panel: Maximum detectable atomic mass ⟨Ad⟩ as a function of dtot, the total distance traveled for UHECRs with rigidity ρmax = 5 × 1018eV. The blue shaded area represent… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Map of the Distance traveled as a function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png]
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: We observe that a scenario where UHECR CNOs from Cen A [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_2.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

139 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Miralda-Escud \' e and author E

    author J. Miralda-Escud \' e and author E. Waxman , journal The Astrophysical Journal volume 462 ( year 1996 ), https://doi.org/10.1086

    1996

  2. [2]

    Murase and author H

    author K. Murase and author H. Takami , journal volume 690 , pages L14 ( year 2009 ), 0810.1813

    arXiv 2009

  3. [3]

    , author Lemoine, M

    author Kalli, S. , author Lemoine, M. , and author Kotera, K. , journal A&A volume 528 , pages A109 ( year 2011 ), ://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201015688

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201015688 2011

  4. [4]

    Takami and author K

    author H. Takami and author K. Murase , journal The Astrophysical Journal volume 748 , pages 9 ( year 2012 ), ://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/748/1/9

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/748/1/9 2012

  5. [5]

    Harari , author S

    author D. Harari , author S. Mollerach , and author E. Roulet , journal volume 103 , eid 023012 ( year 2021 ), 2010.10629

    arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    van Vliet , author A

    author A. van Vliet , author A. Palladino , author A. Taylor , and author W. Winter , journal arXiv e-prints eid arXiv:2104.05732 ( year 2021 ), 2104.05732

    arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    Alvarez-Muniz , author R

    author J. Alvarez-Muniz , author R. Engel , and author T. Stanev , journal The Astrophysical Journal volume 572 , pages 185 ( year 2002 )

    2002

  8. [8]

    author P. L. Biermann and author P. A. Strittmatter , journal volume 322 , pages 643 ( year 1987 )

    1987

Show all 139 references
  1. [9]

    author C. D. Dermer , author S. Razzaque , author J. D. Finke , and author A. Atoyan , journal New Journal of Physics volume 11 , pages 065016 ( year 2009 ), https://doi.org/10.1088

    2009

  2. [10]

    Murase , author C

    author K. Murase , author C. D. Dermer , author H. Takami , and author G. Migliori , journal volume 749 , eid 63 ( year 2012 ), 1107.5576

    2012 arXiv

  3. [11]

    author G. R. Farrar and author A. Gruzinov , journal The Astrophysical Journal volume 693 , pages 329 ( year 2009 ), https://doi.org/10.1088

    2009

  4. [12]

    author S. S. Shabala , author S. Ash , author P. Alexander , and author J. M. Riley , journal volume 388 , pages 625 ( year 2008 ), 0805.4152

    2008 arXiv

  5. [13]

    author M. J. Hardcastle , author W. L. Williams , author P. N. Best , author J. H. Croston , author K. J. Duncan , author H. J. A. R \"o ttgering , author J. Sabater , author T. W. Shimwell , author C. Tasse , author J. R. Callingham , et al. , journal volume 622 , eid A12 ( y...

    2019 arXiv

  6. [14]

    author S. S. Shabala , author N. Jurlin , author R. Morganti , author M. Brienza , author M. J. Hardcastle , author L. E. H. Godfrey , author M. G. H. Krause , and author R. J. Turner , journal volume 496 , pages 1706 ( year 2020 ), 2004.08979

    2020 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Kirkman and author D

    author D. Kirkman and author D. Tytler , journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society volume 391 , pages 1457 ( year 2008 ), ISSN issn 0035-8711 , https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/391/3/1457/13145038/mnras391-1457.pdf , ://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.200...

    2008

  8. [16]

    author T. M. Schmidt , author G. Worseck , author J. F. Hennawi , author J. X. Prochaska , and author N. H. M. Crighton , journal The Astrophysical Journal volume 847 , pages 81 ( year 2017 ), ://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa83ac

    2017 doi

  9. [17]

    author S. E. I. Bosman , author K. Kakiichi , author R. A. Meyer , author M. Gronke , author N. Laporte , and author R. S. Ellis , journal The Astrophysical Journal volume 896 , pages 49 ( year 2020 ), ://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab85cd

    2020 doi

  10. [18]

    Trainor and author C

    author R. Trainor and author C. C. Steidel , journal The Astrophysical Journal volume 775 , pages L3 ( year 2013 ), ://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/775/1/l3

    2013 doi

  11. [19]

    Borisova , author S

    author E. Borisova , author S. Cantalupo , author S. J. Lilly , author R. A. Marino , author S. G. Gallego , author R. Bacon , author J. Blaizot , author N. Bouch \' e , author J. Brinchmann , author C. M. Carollo , et al. , journal The Astrophysical Journal volume 831 , pages...

    2016 doi

  12. [20]

    Martini and author D

    author P. Martini and author D. H. Weinberg , journal volume 547 , pages 12 ( year 2001 ), astro-ph/0002384

    2001 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Haiman and author L

    author Z. Haiman and author L. Hui , journal The Astrophysical Journal volume 547 , pages 27 ( year 2001 ), ://doi.org/10.1086/318330

    2001 doi

  14. [22]

    author P. F. Hopkins , author L. Hernquist , author P. Martini , author T. J. Cox , author B. Robertson , author T. Di Matteo , and author V. Springel , journal volume 625 , pages L71 ( year 2005 ), astro-ph/0502241

    2005 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Shen , author M

    author Y. Shen , author M. A. Strauss , author N. P. Ross , author P. B. Hall , author Y.-T. Lin , author G. T. Richards , author D. P. Schneider , author D. H. Weinberg , author A. J. Connolly , author X. Fan , et al. , journal volume 697 , pages 1656 ( year 2009 ), 0810.4144

    2009 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Takami , author S

    author H. Takami , author S. Inoue , and author T. Yamamoto , journal Astroparticle Physics volume 35 , pages 767 ( year 2012 ), 1202.2874

    2012 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Jansson and author G

    author R. Jansson and author G. R. Farrar , journal volume 761 , eid L11 ( year 2012 ), 1210.7820

    2012 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Alves Batista , author A

    author R. Alves Batista , author A. Dundovic , author M. Erdmann , author K.-H. Kampert , author D. Kuempel , author G. M \"u ller , author G. Sigl , author A. van Vliet , author D. Walz , and author T. Winchen , journal volume 2016 , eid 038 ( year 2016 ), 1603.07142

    2016 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Unger and author G

    author M. Unger and author G. R. Farrar , in booktitle 35th International Cosmic Ray Conference (ICRC2017) ( year 2017 ), vol. volume 301 of series International Cosmic Ray Conference , p. pages 558 , 1707.02339

    2017 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Unger and author G

    author M. Unger and author G. R. Farrar , journal volume 970 , eid 95 ( year 2024 ), 2311.12120

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    author X. H. Sun , author W. Reich , author A. Waelkens , and author T. A. En lin , journal volume 477 , pages 573 ( year 2008 ), 0711.1572

    2008 arXiv

  22. [30]

    author M. S. Pshirkov , author P. G. Tinyakov , author P. P. Kronberg , and author K. J. Newton-McGee , journal volume 738 , eid 192 ( year 2011 ), 1103.0814

    2011 arXiv

  23. [31]

    author G. R. Farrar and author M. S. Sutherland , journal Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics volume 2019 , pages 004 ( year 2019 ), ://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2019/05/004

    2019 doi

  24. [32]

    Murase , journal volume 103 , pages 081102 ( year 2009 )

    author K. Murase , journal volume 103 , pages 081102 ( year 2009 )

    2009

  25. [33]

    Neronov and author I

    author A. Neronov and author I. Vovk , journal Science volume 328 , pages 73 ( year 2010 ), ISSN issn 0036-8075 , https://science.sciencemag.org/content/328/5974/73.full.pdf , ://science.sciencemag.org/content/328/5974/73

    2010

  26. [34]

    Tavecchio , author G

    author F. Tavecchio , author G. Ghisellini , author L. Foschini , author G. Bonnoli , author G. Ghirlanda , and author P. Coppi , journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters volume 406 , pages L70 ( year 2010 ), ISSN issn 1745-3925 , https://academic.oup...

    2010

  27. [35]

    Tavecchio , author G

    author F. Tavecchio , author G. Ghisellini , author G. Bonnoli , and author L. Foschini , journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society volume 414 , pages 3566 ( year 2011 ), ISSN issn 0035-8711 , https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/414/4/3566/18714603/mnras...

    2011

  28. [36]

    Huan , author T

    author H. Huan , author T. Weisgarber , author T. Arlen , and author S. P. Wakely , journal volume 735 , eid L28 ( year 2011 ), 1106.1218

    2011 arXiv

  29. [37]

    author A. M. Taylor , author I. Vovk , and author A. Neronov , journal volume 529 , eid A144 ( year 2011 ), 1101.0932

    2011 arXiv

  30. [38]

    author J. D. Finke , author L. C. Reyes , author M. Georganopoulos , author K. Reynolds , author M. Ajello , author S. J. Fegan , and author K. McCann , journal The Astrophysical Journal volume 814 , pages 20 ( year 2015 ), ://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/814/1/20

    2015 doi

  31. [39]

    Vovk , author A

    author I. Vovk , author A. M. Taylor , author D. Semikoz , and author A. Neronov , journal The Astrophysical Journal volume 747 , pages L14 ( year 2012 ), ://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/747/1/l14

    2012 doi

  32. [40]

    Alves Batista and author A

    author R. Alves Batista and author A. Saveliev , journal Universe volume 7 ( year 2021 ), ISSN issn 2218-1997 , ://www.mdpi.com/2218-1997/7/7/223

    2021

  33. [41]

    author R. M. Kulsrud and author E. G. Zweibel , journal Reports on Progress in Physics volume 71 , pages 046901 ( year 2008 ), ://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/71/4/046901

    2008 doi

  34. [42]

    author J. P. Vallée , journal New Astronomy Reviews volume 55 , pages 91 ( year 2011 ), ISSN issn 1387-6473 , ://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1387647311000182

    2011

  35. [43]

    Ryu , author D

    author D. Ryu , author D. R. G. Schleicher , author R. A. Treumann , author C. G. Tsagas , and author L. M. Widrow , journal volume 166 , pages 1 ( year 2012 ), 1109.4055

    2012 arXiv

  36. [44]

    author S. R. Furlanetto and author A. Loeb , journal The Astrophysical Journal volume 556 , pages 619 ( year 2001 ), ://doi.org/10.1086/321630

    2001 doi

  37. [45]

    Vazza , author G

    author F. Vazza , author G. Brunetti , author M. Brüggen , and author A. Bonafede , journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society volume 474 , pages 1672 ( year 2017 ), ISSN issn 0035-8711 , https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/474/2/1672/22473785/stx2830.pdf...

    2017 doi

  38. [46]

    Pfrommer and author J

    author C. Pfrommer and author J. L. Dursi , journal Nature Physics volume 6 , pages 520 ( year 2010 ), 0911.2476

    2010 arXiv

  39. [47]

    author T. E. Clarke , author P. P. Kronberg , and author H. Böhringer , journal The Astrophysical Journal volume 547 , pages L111 ( year 2001 ), ://doi.org/10.1086/318896

    2001 doi

  40. [48]

    author C. L. Carilli and author G. B. Taylor , journal Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics volume 40 , pages 319 ( year 2002 ), https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093852 , ://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093852

    2002

  41. [49]

    Govoni , author M

    author F. Govoni , author M. Markevitch , author A. Vikhlinin , author L. VanSpeybroeck , author L. Feretti , and author G. Giovannini , journal The Astrophysical Journal volume 605 , pages 695 ( year 2004 ), ://doi.org/10.1086/382674

    2004 doi

  42. [50]

    author J. P. Vall \'e e , journal volume 124 , pages 1322 ( year 2002 )

    2002

  43. [51]

    Brunetti , author G

    author G. Brunetti , author G. Setti , author L. Feretti , and author G. Giovannini , journal volume 320 , pages 365 ( year 2001 ), astro-ph/0008518

    2001 arXiv

  44. [52]

    o ttgering , and author M. Br \

    author R. Cassano , author G. Brunetti , author H. J. A. R \"o ttgering , and author M. Br \"u ggen , journal volume 509 , eid A68 ( year 2010 ), 0910.2025

    2010 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Cuciti , author F

    author V. Cuciti , author F. de Gasperin , author M. Br \"u ggen , author F. Vazza , author G. Brunetti , author T. W. Shimwell , author H. W. Edler , author R. J. van Weeren , author A. Botteon , author R. Cassano , et al. , journal volume 609 , pages 911 ( year 2022 ), 2209.13617

    2022 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Ryu , author H

    author D. Ryu , author H. Kang , author J. Cho , and author S. Das , journal Science volume 320 , pages 909 ( year 2008 ), 0805.2466

    2008 arXiv

  47. [55]

    Aab , author P

    author A. Aab , author P. Abreu , author M. Aglietta , author I. F. M. Albuquerque , author I. Allekotte , author A. Almela , author J. A. Castillo , author J. Alvarez-Mu \ n iz , author G. A. Anastasi , author L. Anchordoqui , et al. , journal The Astrophysical Journal volume...

    2018 doi

  48. [56]

    Abdul Halim , author P

    author A. Abdul Halim , author P. Abreu , author M. Aglietta , author I. Allekotte , author K. Almeida Cheminant , author A. Almela , author R. Aloisio , author J. Alvarez-Muniz , author J. Ammerman Yebra , author G. A. Anastasi , et al. , journal PoS volume ICRC2023 , pages 5...

    2023

  49. [57]

    Kim , author D

    author J. Kim , author D. Ivanov , author K. Kawata , author H. Sagawa , and author G. Thomson , journal PoS volume ICRC2023 , pages 244 ( year 2023 )

    2023

  50. [58]

    author The Pierre Auger Collaboration , author A. A. Halim , author P. Abreu , author M. Aglietta , author I. Allekotte , author K. Almeida Cheminant , author A. Almela , author R. Aloisio , author J. Alvarez-Mu \ n iz , author J. Ammerman Yebra , et al. , journal arXiv e-prin...

    2024

  51. [59]

    Globus , author T

    author N. Globus , author T. Piran , author Y. Hoffman , author E. Carlesi , and author D. Pomar \`e de , journal volume 484 , pages 4167 ( year 2019 ), 1808.02048

    2019 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Globus and author T

    author N. Globus and author T. Piran , journal volume 850 , eid L25 ( year 2017 ), 1709.10110

    2017 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Ding , author N

    author C. Ding , author N. Globus , and author G. R. Farrar , journal volume 913 , eid L13 ( year 2021 ), 2101.04564

    2021 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Bister and author G

    author T. Bister and author G. R. Farrar , journal volume 966 , eid 71 ( year 2024 ), 2312.02645

    2024 arXiv

  55. [63]

    Kushnir , author B

    author D. Kushnir , author B. Katz , and author E. Waxman , journal Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics volume 2009 , pages 024 ( year 2009 ), ://doi.org/10.1088/1475-7516/2009/09/024

    2009 doi

  56. [64]

    Blasi , author S

    author P. Blasi , author S. Burles , and author A. V. Olinto , journal The Astrophysical Journal volume 514 , pages L79 ( year 1999 ), ://doi.org/10.1086/311958

    1999 doi

  57. [65]

    author P. P. Kronberg , author R. Kothes , author C. J. Salter , and author P. Perillat , journal volume 659 , pages 267 ( year 2007 ), 0704.3288

    2007 arXiv

  58. [66]

    author Planck Collaboration , author P. A. R. Ade , author N. Aghanim , author M. Arnaud , author F. Arroja , author M. Ashdown , author J. Aumont , author C. Baccigalupi , author M. Ballardini , author A. J. Banday , et al. , journal volume 594 , eid A19 ( year 2016 ), 1502.01594

    2016 arXiv

  59. [67]

    author M. S. Pshirkov , author P. G. Tinyakov , and author F. R. Urban , journal volume 116 , eid 191302 ( year 2016 ), 1504.06546

    2016 arXiv

  60. [68]

    author J. H. Matthews , author A. R. Bell , author K. M. Blundell , and author A. T. Araudo , journal volume 479 , pages L76 ( year 2018 ), 1805.01902

    2018 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Eichmann , author M

    author B. Eichmann , author M. Kachelrie , and author F. Oikonomou , journal volume 2022 , eid 006 ( year 2022 ), 2202.11942

    2022 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Eichmann and author M

    author B. Eichmann and author M. Kachelrie , journal volume 2023 , eid 053 ( year 2023 ), 2210.07090

    2023 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Mollerach and author E

    author S. Mollerach and author E. Roulet , journal volume 99 , eid 103010 ( year 2019 ), 1903.05722

    2019 arXiv

  64. [72]

    Mollerach and author E

    author S. Mollerach and author E. Roulet , journal volume 105 , eid 063001 ( year 2022 ), 2111.00560

    2022 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Fargion , author P

    author D. Fargion , author P. Oliva , and author P. G. De Sanctis Lucentini , in booktitle Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Rays (UHECR2016) ( year 2018 ), p. pages 011010 , 1703.10964

    2018 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Aloisio , author D

    author R. Aloisio , author D. Boncioli , author A. F. Grillo , author S. Petrera , and author F. Salamida , journal volume 2012 , eid 007 ( year 2012 ), 1204.2970

    2012 arXiv

  67. [75]

    author R. A. Batista , author D. Boncioli , author A. di Matteo , author A. van Vliet , and author D. Walz , journal volume 2015 , pages 063 ( year 2015 )

    2015

  68. [76]

    Alves Batista , author J

    author R. Alves Batista , author J. Becker Tjus , author J. D \"o rner , author A. Dundovic , author B. Eichmann , author A. Frie , author C. Heiter , author M. R. Hoerbe , author K.-H. Kampert , author L. Merten , et al. , journal volume 2022 , eid 035 ( year 2022 ), 2208.00107

    2022 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Dole , author G

    author H. Dole , author G. Lagache , author J. L. Puget , author K. I. Caputi , author N. Fern \'a ndez-Conde , author E. Le Floc'h , author C. Papovich , author P. G. P \'e rez-Gonz \'a lez , author G. H. Rieke , and author M. Blaylock , journal volume 451 , pages 417 ( year ...

    2006 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Bhattacharjee and author G

    author P. Bhattacharjee and author G. Sigl , journal volume 327 , pages 109 ( year 2000 ), astro-ph/9811011

    2000 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Das , author H

    author S. Das , author H. Kang , author D. Ryu , and author J. Cho , journal The Astrophysical Journal volume 682 , pages 29 ( year 2008 ), ://dx.doi.org/10.1086/588278

    2008 doi

  72. [80]

    Davoudifar , author S

    author P. Davoudifar , author S. J. Fatemi , author R. Clay , and author B. Whelan , journal Journal of Sciences, Islamic Republic of Iran volume 22 , pages 75 ( year 2011 ), ://sid.ir/paper/84069/en

    2011

  73. [81]

    author C. K. Birdsall and author A. B. Langdon , title Plasma Physics via Computer Simulation ( publisher CRC Press , year 1991 ), ://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991ppcs.book.....B

    1991

  74. [82]

    Beresnyak , author H

    author A. Beresnyak , author H. Yan , and author A. Lazarian , journal The Astrophysical Journal volume 728 , pages 60 ( year 2011 ), ://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/728/1/60

    2011 doi

  75. [83]

    Cohet and author A

    author R. Cohet and author A. Marcowith , journal volume 588 , eid A73 ( year 2016 ), 1601.04971

    2016 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Dundovic , author O

    author A. Dundovic , author O. Pezzi , author P. Blasi , author C. Evoli , and author W. H. Matthaeus , journal volume 102 , eid 103016 ( year 2020 ), 2007.09142

    2020 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Shalchi and author A

    author A. Shalchi and author A. Dosch , journal volume 79 , eid 083001 ( year 2009 )

    2009

  78. [86]

    Plotnikov , author G

    author I. Plotnikov , author G. Pelletier , and author M. Lemoine , journal A&A volume 532 , pages A68 ( year 2011 ), ://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201117182

    2011 doi

  79. [87]

    Plotnikov , author G

    author I. Plotnikov , author G. Pelletier , and author M. Lemoine , journal volume 430 , pages 1280 ( year 2013 ), 1206.6634

    2013 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Casse , author M

    author F. Casse , author M. Lemoine , and author G. Pelletier , journal Phys. Rev. D volume 65 , pages 023002 ( year 2001 ), ://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.65.023002

    2001 doi

  81. [89]

    author C. S. Ng , author A. Bhattacharjee , author D. Munsi , author P. A. Isenberg , and author C. W. Smith , journal Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics) volume 115 , eid A02101 ( year 2010 ), 1106.0530

    2010 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Treumann , author W

    author R. Treumann , author W. Baumjohann , and author Y. Narita , journal Frontiers in Physics volume 3 , eid 22 ( year 2015 )

    2015

  83. [91]

    author E. N. Parker , journal volume 13 , pages 9 ( year 1965 )

    1965

  84. [92]

    author J. R. Jokipii , journal volume 146 , pages 480 ( year 1966 )

    1966

  85. [93]

    author M. A. Forman and author L. J. Gleeson , journal volume 32 , pages 77 ( year 1975 )

    1975

  86. [94]

    Chapman , author T

    author S. Chapman , author T. Cowling , author D. Burnett , and author C. Cercignani , title The Mathematical Theory of Non-uniform Gases: An Account of the Kinetic Theory of Viscosity, Thermal Conduction and Diffusion in Gases , Cambridge Mathematical Library ( publisher Camb...

    1990

  87. [95]

    Kolmogorov , journal Akademiia Nauk SSSR Doklady volume 30 , pages 301 ( year 1941 )

    author A. Kolmogorov , journal Akademiia Nauk SSSR Doklady volume 30 , pages 301 ( year 1941 )

    1941

  88. [96]

    Stawarz and author V

    author . Stawarz and author V. Petrosian , journal volume 681 , pages 1725 ( year 2008 ), 0803.0989

    2008 arXiv

  89. [97]

    author P. S. Iroshnikov , journal volume 7 , pages 566 ( year 1964 )

    1964

  90. [98]

    Lemoine , journal Journal of Plasma Physics volume 89 , eid 175890501 ( year 2023 ), 2304.03023

    author M. Lemoine , journal Journal of Plasma Physics volume 89 , eid 175890501 ( year 2023 ), 2304.03023

    2023 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Kempski , author D

    author P. Kempski , author D. B. Fielding , author E. Quataert , author A. K. Galishnikova , author M. W. Kunz , author A. A. Philippov , and author B. Ripperda , journal volume 525 , pages 4985 ( year 2023 ), 2304.12335

    2023 arXiv

  92. [100]

    o derstr \

    author A. Tamii , author L. Pellegri , author P. A. S \"o derstr \"o m , author D. Allard , author S. Goriely , author T. Inakura , author E. Khan , author E. Kido , author M. Kimura , author E. Litvinova , et al. , journal arXiv e-prints eid arXiv:2211.03986 ( year 2022 ), 2211.03986

    2022 arXiv

  93. [101]

    Mbarek , author D

    author R. Mbarek , author D. Caprioli , and author K. Murase , journal volume 942 , eid 37 ( year 2023 ), 2207.07130

    2023 arXiv

  94. [102]

    author A. N. Gorbunov and author V. A. Osipova , journal Soviet Physics JETP volume 16 , pages 27 ( year 1963 ), note translated from J. Exptl. Theoret. Phys. (U.S.S.R.) 43, 40-50 (July, 1962)

    1963

  95. [103]

    author F. W. Stecker and author M. H. Salamon , journal volume 512 , pages 521 ( year 1999 ), astro-ph/9808110

    1999 arXiv

  96. [104]

    Odsuren , author Y

    author M. Odsuren , author Y. Kikuchi , author T. Myo , author M. Aikawa , and author K. Katō , journal Physical Review C volume 92 , pages 014322 ( year 2015 )

    2015

  97. [105]

    Kido , author T

    author E. Kido , author T. Inakura , author M. Kimura , author N. Kobayashi , author S. Nagataki , author N. Shimizu , author A. Tamii , and author Y. Utsuno , journal Astroparticle Physics volume 152 , eid 102866 ( year 2023 ), 2206.03447

    2023 arXiv

  98. [106]

    Abreu , author M

    author P. Abreu , author M. Aglietta , author J. M. Albury , author I. Allekotte , author K. A. Cheminant , author A. Almela , author J. Alvarez-Muñiz , author R. A. Batista , author J. A. Yebra , author G. A. Anastasi , et al. , journal The Astrophysical Journal volume 935 , ...

    2022 doi

  99. [107]

    author R. U. Abbasi , author Y. Abe , author T. Abu-Zayyad , author M. Allen , author Y. Arai , author R. Arimura , author E. Barcikowski , author J. W. Belz , author D. R. Bergman , author S. A. Blake , et al. , journal volume 133 , eid 041001 ( year 2024 ), 2406.19287

    2024

  100. [108]

    Ferrarese , author J

    author L. Ferrarese , author J. R. Mould , author P. B. Stetson , author J. L. Tonry , author J. P. Blakeslee , and author E. A. Ajhar , journal The Astrophysical Journal volume 654 , pages 186 ( year 2007 ), ://doi.org/10.1086/506612

    2007 doi

  101. [109]

    Majaess , journal volume 60 , pages 121 ( year 2010 ), 1006.2458

    author D. Majaess , journal volume 60 , pages 121 ( year 2010 ), 1006.2458

    2010 arXiv

  102. [110]

    Aloisio , author V

    author R. Aloisio , author V. Berezinsky , and author P. Blasi , journal volume 10 , eid 020 ( year 2014 ), 1312.7459

    2014 arXiv

  103. [111]

    Aab , author P

    author A. Aab , author P. Abreu , author M. Aglietta , author I. A. Samarai , author I. F. M. Albuquerque , author I. Allekotte , author A. Almela , author J. Alvarez Castillo , author J. Alvarez-Mu \ n iz , author G. A. Anastasi , et al. , journal Science volume 357 , pages 1...

    2017 arXiv

  104. [112]

    author E. Parizot , journal Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements volume 136 , pages 169 ( year 2004 ), ISSN issn 0920-5632 , note cRIS 2004 Proceedings of the Cosmic Ray International Seminars: GZK and Surroundings , ://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0920563...

    2004

  105. [113]

    Abdul Halim , author P

    author A. Abdul Halim , author P. Abreu , author M. Aglietta , author I. Allekotte , author K. Almeida Cheminant , author A. Almela , author R. Aloisio , author J. Alvarez-Mu \ n iz , author J. Ammerman Yebra , author G. A. Anastasi , et al. , journal volume 2024 , eid 094 ( y...

    2024 arXiv

  106. [114]

    Mbarek and author D

    author R. Mbarek and author D. Caprioli , journal volume 886 , eid 8 ( year 2019 ), 1904.02720

    2019 arXiv

  107. [115]

    Mbarek and author D

    author R. Mbarek and author D. Caprioli , journal volume 921 , pages 85 ( year 2021 ), ://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac1da8

    2021 doi

  108. [116]

    author V. S. Berezinsky , author P. Blasi , and author V. S. Ptuskin , journal volume 487 , pages 529 ( year 1997 ), astro-ph/9609048

    1997 arXiv

  109. [117]

    Blasi and author A

    author P. Blasi and author A. V. Olinto , journal volume 59 , eid 023001 ( year 1998 ), astro-ph/9806264

    1998 arXiv

  110. [118]

    author J. H. Matthews and author A. M. Taylor , journal volume 503 , pages 5948 ( year 2021 ), 2103.06900

    2021 arXiv

  111. [119]

    Condorelli , author J

    author A. Condorelli , author J. Biteau , and author R. Adam , journal The Astrophysical Journal volume 957 , pages 80 ( year 2023 ), ISSN issn 1538-4357 , ://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acfeef

    2023 doi

  112. [120]

    author M. C. Begelman , author R. D. Blandford , and author M. J. Rees , journal Reviews of Modern Physics volume 56 , pages 255 ( year 1984 ), ://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984RvMP...56..255B

    1984

  113. [121]

    author P. N. Best , author A. von der Linden , author G. Kauffmann , author T. M. Heckman , and author C. R. Kaiser , journal volume 379 , pages 894 ( year 2007 ), astro-ph/0611197

    2007 arXiv

  114. [122]

    Fang and author K

    author K. Fang and author K. Murase , journal Nature Physics volume 14 , pages 396 ( year 2018 ), 1704.00015 , ://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018NatPh..14..396F

    2018 arXiv

  115. [123]

    Caprioli , journal volume 811 , eid L38 ( year 2015 ), 1505.06739

    author D. Caprioli , journal volume 811 , eid L38 ( year 2015 ), 1505.06739

    2015 arXiv

  116. [124]

    Katz , author R

    author B. Katz , author R. Budnik , and author E. Waxman , journal volume 2009 , eid 020 ( year 2009 ), 0811.3759

    2009 arXiv

  117. [125]

    Murase and author M

    author K. Murase and author M. Fukugita , journal Phys. Rev. D volume 99 , pages 063012 ( year 2019 ), ://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.063012

    2019 doi

  118. [126]

    Jiang , author B

    author Y. Jiang , author B. T. Zhang , and author K. Murase , journal Phys. Rev. D volume 104 , pages 043017 ( year 2021 ), ://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.104.043017

    2021 doi

  119. [127]

    author A. R. Bell and author J. H. Matthews , journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society volume 511 , pages 448 ( year 2022 ), ISSN issn 0035-8711 , https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/511/1/448/47756589/stac031.pdf , ://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac031

    2022 doi

  120. [128]

    author A. M. Taylor , author J. H. Matthews , and author A. R. Bell , journal volume 524 , pages 631 ( year 2023 ), 2302.06489

    2023 arXiv

  121. [129]

    Mbarek , author D

    author R. Mbarek , author D. Caprioli , and author K. Murase , journal Phys. Rev. D volume 111 , pages 023024 ( year 2025 ), ://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.023024

    2025 doi

  122. [130]

    Bister , author G

    author T. Bister , author G. R. Farrar , and author M. Unger , journal volume 975 , eid L21 ( year 2024 ), 2408.00614

    2024 arXiv

  123. [131]

    Waxman and author J

    author E. Waxman and author J. Miralda-Escude , journal volume 472 , pages L89 ( year 1996 ), astro-ph/9607059

    1996 arXiv

  124. [132]

    Globus , author A

    author N. Globus , author A. Fedynitch , and author R. D. Blandford , journal volume 945 , eid 12 ( year 2023 ), 2210.15885

    2023 arXiv

  125. [133]

    Allard , journal Astroparticle Physics volume 39 , pages 33 ( year 2012 ), 1111.3290

    author D. Allard , journal Astroparticle Physics volume 39 , pages 33 ( year 2012 ), 1111.3290

    2012 arXiv

  126. [134]

    Greisen , journal Physical Review Letters volume 16 , pages 748 ( year 1966 ), ://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1966PhRvL..16..748G

    author K. Greisen , journal Physical Review Letters volume 16 , pages 748 ( year 1966 ), ://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1966PhRvL..16..748G

    1966

  127. [135]

    author G. T. Zatsepin and author V. A. Kuz'min , journal Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters volume 4 , pages 78 ( year 1966 )

    1966

  128. [136]

    author A. A. Halim , author P. Abreu , author M. Aglietta , author I. Allekotte , author K. A. Cheminant , author A. Almela , author J. Alvarez-Muñiz , author J. A. Yebra , author G. Anastasi , author L. Anchordoqui , et al. , journal Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Phy...

    2023 doi

  129. [137]

    author J. R. H \"o randel et al. , journal Journal of Physics Conference Series volume 39 , pages 463 ( year 2006 ), astro-ph/0511649 , ://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006JPhCS..39..463H

    2006 arXiv

  130. [138]

    Caprioli , author E

    author D. Caprioli , author E. Amato , and author P. Blasi , journal APh volume 33 , pages 160 ( year 2010 ), 0912.2964

    2010 arXiv

  131. [139]

    Caprioli , author D

    author D. Caprioli , author D. T. Yi , and author A. Spitkovsky , journal volume 119 , eid 171101 ( year 2017 ), 1704.08252

    2017 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.