A Pristine View of Galactic Globular Clusters and their Peripheries: Omega Centauri

M. N. Ishigaki; P. B. Kuzma

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 113 references

A Pristine View of Galactic Globular Clusters and their Peripheries: Omega Centauri

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper claims the first evidence that the two dominant stellar populations of Omega Centauri extend beyond the tidal radius and into its tidal tails, implying the tails are made of tidally stripped cluster stars.

desk verdict A useful first chemical map of Omega Cen's outer regions, but the two-population claim in the tails needs a selection-function analysis before it can be trusted. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.01135 v1 pith:MNGDYYRX submitted 2025-02-03 astro-ph.GA

P. B. Kuzma , M. N. Ishigaki This is my paper · ORCID

classification astro-ph.GA

keywords OmegaCentauriglobularclusterstidaltailsmultiplestellarpopulationsPristinesurveyGaiaastrometryCaHKphotometrymetallicitydistribution

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

$\Omega$ Centauri is the Milky Way's most massive globular cluster, and its outer regions and tidal tails have been hard to tie chemically to its well-studied core. This paper tries to establish that the two stellar populations that dominate the cluster's inner body, at photometric metallicities near -1.8 and -1.5 dex, are also present beyond the tidal radius and into the tidal tails, and that they are mixed along the stream. If that is right, the tidal tails are made of stars actually stripped from the cluster, and the cluster's multiple populations are stripped together rather than selectively. That would give astronomers a chemical handle to connect $\Omega$ Cen's debris to proposed accretion events and to understand how globular clusters feed the Galactic halo.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the CaHKind colour-colour index, (CaHK - G0) - 2.5(GBP,0 - GRP,0), built from Pristine's CaHK-band photometry and Gaia's dereddened colours, which is sensitive to metallicity and helps separate $\Omega$ Cen-like stars from the Galactic field. Membership probabilities are built by multiplying a 2D Gaussian proper-motion likelihood, a k-nearest-neighbour local density in colour-magnitude space, and the analogous density in CaHKind space, with the cluster-to-field ratio set by maximising a mixture likelihood. The metallicity distributions at different radii are then decomposed into 1D Gaussian mixtures selected by the Akaike Information Criterion.

What would settle it

A spectroscopic survey of the conservative high-probability stars (Pmem > 0.99) between the tidal and Jacobi radii and along the tidal tails would settle it: if the [Fe/H] distribution does not show two groups near -2.0 and -1.3 dex, or at least a broad distribution matching the cluster's main body, the claim fails. Re-running the analysis with a crowding-corrected metallicity calibration and watching the bimodality disappear would also falsify it.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In this paper the authors report the first detection of multiple stellar populations outside the tidal radius of $\Omega$ Centauri. Using a conservative membership threshold, they find two groups between the tidal radius (48 arcmin) and the Jacobi radius (107 arcmin), at [Fe/H]CaHKsyn = -2.01 +/- 0.07 and -1.26 +/- 0.06 dex, and beyond the Jacobi radius a broad metallicity distribution that spans the same range as the cluster's main body. They interpret this as the first evidence that the same two populations seen in the outer regions of the cluster are present outside the tidal radius and into the tidal tails, mixed about the stream and typically among the faintest stars in the sample, all indicating that the tails are constructed of tidally stripped $\Omega$ Cen stars.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the synthetic CaHK metallicities and the CaHKind colour-colour separation remain accurate for the sparse outer-region stars; the paper itself shows deviations of up to 0.2 dex or more from independent spectroscopic metallicities for stars within 15 arcmin, and if a similar bias affects the outer regions, the two detected populations could be artefacts of the photometric pipeline.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The tidal tails of Omega Centauri are confirmed as tidally stripped cluster stars rather than chance alignments of field stars.
The cluster's multiple stellar populations are stripped together and remain mixed along the stream, preserving the cluster's internal population mix in its debris.
The presence of a metal-rich group between the tidal and Jacobi radii supports earlier photometric evidence that Omega Cen's more metal-rich populations are more spatially extended.
Stars in the Fimbuthal stream and Stream #55 can now be chemically tested against the measured extra-tidal populations to firm up their association with the cluster.
Deeper photometry and targeted spectroscopy should reveal more faint stripped stars and fill the apparent gap between central and tidal-region populations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A direct way to test the claim is to put the high-probability extra-tidal stars on a medium- or high-resolution spectrograph; if the two groups near -2.0 and -1.3 dex do not reproduce in [Fe/H], the detection is a photometric artefact.
The same photometric-plus-astrometric pipeline could be turned on other massive globular clusters with known tidal debris to see whether multiple populations are generically stripped, rather than a peculiarity of Omega Cen.
The well-mixed nature of the tails implies any radial population gradient inside the cluster is erased in the debris, which is a constraint on models of tidal stripping and internal kinematics.
If crowding inflates the metal-poor tail inside 15 arcmin, as the paper suspects, the true metal-poor content of Omega Cen may be smaller than the raw synthetic metallicities suggest, with consequences for the dwarf-galaxy-core interpretation.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Here's the short version: the paper gives the first metallicity-based look at the outer regions and tidal tails of Omega Cen, using Pristine photometric metallicities. It's a useful dataset, but the claim that two stellar populations extend into the tails is not yet established—the selection method and small samples could manufacture the peaks.

What's genuinely new is the metallicity distribution as a function of radius out to about 5 degrees, and the identification of extra-tidal stars with metallicities similar to the cluster's. The authors also release membership probabilities, which is a nice public resource. The recovery of the tidal tails with a position angle of 117 degrees, consistent with earlier Gaia-based work, is a good sanity check, and the cross-calibration with APOGEE and Zhang et al. (Fig. 9) shows the synthetic metallicities behave well outside about 30 arcmin, where crowding is not an issue. That part is solid.

The stress-test concern lands. The membership probability P_mem includes P_CC, a nearest-neighbour density in CaHKind, and the synthetic [Fe/H] is derived from the same CaHK photometry. A hard P_mem > 0.99 cut preferentially selects stars whose CaHKind lies near the dense peaks of the cluster reference sample, so the resulting metallicity histogram can show peaks near the cluster's even if the underlying tail population is smooth. The paper never quantifies this selection function. That is a serious problem, not a minor caveat.

The sample sizes make it worse: the rt–rj histograms in Fig. 8 have only a few stars per 0.1-dex bin, and the two peaks are claimed without any formal AIC or dip test—they're asserted by eye. Also, the peaks outside the tidal radius (-2.01 and -1.26 dex) are not the same as the dominant inner peaks (-1.83 and -1.45); the paper calls them 'the same two populations' but they're offset by a couple tenths of a dex. That mismatch might be real physics, but it isn't discussed.

To be fair, the paper is upfront about the crowding issue in the inner 15 arcmin and notes the metal-poor end may be biased. That honesty is good, but the selection effect is independent of crowding and remains unaddressed.

Who should read this? People working on globular cluster disruption, tidal streams, and the origin of Omega Cen. It's a first attempt and a useful data release, but the headline result needs confirmation—ideally a handful of spectroscopic metallicities of the conservative tail sample, or at least a forward-modelled selection function.

I'd send it to a referee, because the question is important and the paper is not sloppy. But I'd ask for major revisions around the selection bias and a proper significance test for bimodality. As it stands, the two-population claim should be treated as provisional.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper presents a probabilistic selection of Omega Centauri-like stars out to 5 degrees using Pristine-Gaia synthetic CaHK photometry and Gaia astrometry, combining proper motion, CMD, and colour-colour membership probabilities. The method recovers previously known tidal tails and measures the photometric metallicity distribution as a function of clustercentric radius. The authors report two dominant populations within the cluster (peaks at about -1.82 and -1.45 dex) between 15 arcmin and the tidal radius, and claim the first detection of the same two populations outside the tidal radius and in the tidal tails (with peaks at about -2.01 and -1.26 dex between the tidal and Jacobi radii). They interpret the well-mixed metallicity distribution in the tails as evidence that the tails are built from tidally stripped cluster stars.

Significance. If the claimed extra-tidal populations are real, the paper would provide the first chemical tagging of multiple stellar populations in the tidal tails of a disrupting globular cluster, with implications for how multiple populations are stripped and mixed and for connections to halo substructures such as Fimbuthal and Stream #55. The paper also releases membership probabilities as a data product, which is useful. However, the central claim is currently not secure because the membership selection and the metallicity estimator share the same CaHK photometry, and because the small extra-tidal sample is not subjected to formal statistical tests.

major comments (3)

[§3, Eqs. (5)–(7); §4.2, Fig. 8] The central claim of two populations beyond the tidal radius is not currently supported because the membership probability P_mem (Eq. 7) includes P_CC (Eq. 5), a 10-nearest-neighbour density in CaHKind and (GBP−RP)0 evaluated against the cluster reference sample, while [Fe/H]CaHKsyn is derived from the same CaHK photometry. A hard P_mem>0.99 cut will preferentially retain stars whose CaHKind lies near the dense parts of the cluster colour-colour locus; in the outer field this can produce [Fe/H] peaks near the cluster's known populations even if the underlying tail metallicity distribution is smooth or unimodal. The paper does not quantify this selection function, nor does it test whether a smooth tail model subjected to the same membership cuts would reproduce the two peaks in Fig. 8. Since the abstract explicitly claims 'first evidence' for these populations, this gap must be closed.
[§5.1, Fig. 9] The paper documents in §5.1 that the Pristine-Gaia synthetic [Fe/H] values deviate from APOGEE/M21 by up to 0.2 dex or more within 15 arcmin and still show a non-one-to-one relation in the 15–30 arcmin bin. The abstract's first cited result (two components at -1.82 and -1.45 dex between 15 arcmin and the tidal radius) is measured over a range that includes the poorly calibrated inner annulus; the one-to-one external calibration shown in Fig. 9 is only demonstrated outside 30 arcmin. Because the internal warning in §5.1 explicitly says that metal-poor populations may be biased, the authors need to either restrict the in-cluster population claim to the radius range with validated photometric metallicities or provide an additional validation (e.g., a crowding-aware simulation or a comparison using an independent metallicity estimator) for the 15 arcmin to rt annulus.
[§4.2, Fig. 8] The two extra-tidal 'populations' are inferred from histograms with very small counts: the rt–rj panel of Fig. 8 shows at most a few stars per 0.1-dex bin, and no statistical test (AIC, dip test, bootstrap likelihood ratio, or comparison with a field model) is presented for this region. The quoted uncertainties of ±0.06–0.07 dex are bootstrap uncertainties on the peak locations, not a demonstration that the distribution is bimodal. Given that the central claim rests on this bimodality, a formal significance test or a statement of the expected histogram under a single-component model is required.

minor comments (6)

[Abstract] The abstract reads 'at -1.83 and 1.45 dex'; the second value should be '-1.45 dex' (missing minus sign).
[Fig. 4 caption] The caption's 'on the right' and 'for the left' appear to be swapped relative to the two panels: the four-peak fit is for r<15 arcmin (left panel) and the two-peak fit is for 15 arcmin<r<rt (right panel). The caption also gives a peak at -1.22±0.05 dex while the text in §4.2 gives -1.19±0.06 dex; these values should be reconciled.
[Data Availability] 'The data sets that are unpinning this paper' should be 'underpinning'.
[Throughout] The notation for the membership probability is inconsistent ('Pmem' and 'P_mem' both appear); one symbol should be used throughout.
[Fig. 9 label] The label 'Mészáros + 21' should be 'Mészáros et al. 2021' to match journal style.
[§5.2] 'the under theory of GC disruption' should read 'the underlying theory of GC disruption'.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

Outer-region 'two populations' partly self-confirming: the P_mem>0.99 sample is selected in CaHKind, the same CaHK photometry used to derive [Fe/H]CaHKsyn.

self definitional [§3 (cluster reference sample and eqs. 4–7); §4.2 (conservative P_mem>0.99 sample and Fig. 8)]
"The membership probability in colour-colour space (PCC), the space of colour index (CaHK − G0) − 2.5(GBP,0 − GRP,0) (hereafter CaHKind) ... take the same form as eq. 4. ... Therefore, to comment on the metallicities along the debris, we adopted a very conservative probability threshold to analyse, Pmem > 0.99."

PCC is a 10-nearest-neighbour local density in CaHKind evaluated against the cluster reference sample, which is defined as all stars within the tidal radius and near the cluster proper motion. CaHKind is constructed from the same (CaHK−G0) photometry from which the Pristine-Gaia-synthetic catalogue derives [Fe/H]CaHKsyn. Stars passing the hard Pmem > 0.99 cut therefore preferentially occupy the dense regions of the cluster's own colour-colour locus, and their [Fe/H]CaHKsyn histogram (Fig. 8) is expected to reproduce the cluster's metallicity peaks even if the underlying tail population is smooth or unimodal.

full rationale

The paper's tidal-tail recovery, position angle, and spatial-overdensity results rest on Gaia astrometry and an external orbit and are not circular; the self-citation to Kuzma et al. (2021) is used for method inspiration and comparison, not as load-bearing uniqueness evidence. The central population claim, however, is not fully independent. The conservative sample used for the rt–rj metallicity histogram is defined by Pmem > 0.99, and Pmem includes PCC, a nearest-neighbour density in CaHKind measured against the cluster reference sample. Since CaHKind and [Fe/H]CaHKsyn are both derived from the same CaHK photometry in the Pristine-Gaia-synthetic catalogue, the selected stars are expected to reflect the cluster's colour-colour peaks in metallicity space; the detection of the 'same two populations' outside rt therefore has a built-in component. The paper does not correct or model this selection function, so the strength of the 'first detection' claim is overstated. The calibration comparison in §5.1 is an honest external check and does not itself create circularity, though it compounds the concern in the crowded inner regions. Overall score 6 reflects one central claim partially reducing to the membership construction, while the spatial and mixing results retain independent content.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The paper's free parameters are the Gaussian mixture components, but these describe the data and are not used to force the tail populations to match the cluster populations. The main unstated burden is the accuracy of the synthetic photometric metallicities. The paper partially addresses this with cross-checks, but not in the tails.

free parameters (3)

Gaussian mixture component means for inner populations = -2.11, -1.83, -1.50, -1.22 dex
Fitted to the observed metallicity distribution within 15 arcmin via AIC model selection. These are the reference populations against which outer-region populations are compared.
Gaussian mixture component means for 15 arcmin to tidal radius = -1.82, -1.45 dex
Fitted to the observed metallicity distribution between 15 arcmin and the tidal radius. These are the main populations later identified in the tails.
Gaussian mixture component means between tidal and Jacobi radii = -2.01, -1.26 dex
Fitted to the conservative sample (Pmem > 0.99) in the region between tidal and Jacobi radii.

assumptions (3)

domain assumption Photometric CaHK metallicities from the Pristine-Gaia synthetic catalogue are reliable tracers of [Fe/H] in the outer regions.
The entire population analysis is built on these values. Section 5.1 shows the synthetic values deviate from APOGEE/M21 in the inner 15 arcmin, so the assumption is partially checked but not fully validated in the tails.
domain assumption The cluster reference sample defined within the tidal radius and within 1.5 mas/yr of the bulk proper motion is representative of Omega Centauri's stellar populations.
Used in Section 3 to build the probability densities for proper motion, CMD, and colour-colour space.
domain assumption The MWPotential2014 Galactic potential from Bovy (2014) adequately describes the orbit of Omega Centauri.
Used to compute the orbit overlaid in Figures 3 and 7. The orbit is used only for context and comparison, not as a central constraint, so a potential error would not break the main claim.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Pristine View of Galactic Globular Clusters and their Peripheries: Omega Centauri." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MNGDYYRX

@misc{pith2026250201135,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Pristine View of Galactic Globular Clusters and their Peripheries: Omega Centauri},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MNGDYYRX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.01135}
}

abstract

The central regions of the globular cluster Omega Centauri ($\omega$ Cen) have been extensively studied, but its outer regions and tidal structure have been less so. Gaia's astrometry uncovered substantial tidal substructure associated with $\omega$ Cen, yet the lack of chemical tagging makes these associations tenuous. In this paper, we utilise the Gaia-Synthetic CaHK-band photometry, metallicities from the Pristine survey and Gaia's astrometry to explore up to a clustercentric radius of 5 degrees from $\omega$ Cen. We identify $\omega$ Cen-like stars based on proper motion, colour-magnitude and colour-colour space, exploring the morphology, and stellar populations of the outer regions. Our probabilistic approach recovers the tidal tails of $\omega$ Cen, and we investigate the metallicity distribution of $\omega$ Cen ranging from a radius of 15 arcmin to the tidal radius, and beyond into the tidal tails. We present (1) two components between 15 arcmin and tidal radius at -1.83 and -1.45 dex which are also the dominant populations within 15 arcmin, and (2) the first evidence that the same two populations in the outer regions of the cluster are present outside the tidal radius and into the tidal tails. These populations are mixed about the stream, and are typically amongst the faintest stars in our sample; all indicating that the tidal tails are made of tidally stripped $\omega$ Cen stars.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.01135 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Top left: spatial distribution of all the retrieved stars in the Pristine-Gaia-synthetic catalogue. The two green circles indicate the cut-off radii for the cluster (𝑟𝑡 , 48 arcmin) and field (2 degrees) reference samples. Top right: Proper motion distribution of the cluster sample (red) and field reference sample (black.). The bottom row figures show the reference samples in colour-magnitude space (bottom left) and… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Distributions across the three-parameter spaces shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Surface density 2D distribution of all stars in our sample using the variable smoothing technique. Each star has been weighted by its membership probability. Colours relate to the number of 𝜎 (1,2 and 3) above the mean bin value outside a clustercentric radius of 2 deg. The forward (backward) orbit (Bovy 2015) is shown by the solid (dashed) grey line, the Jacobi radius (106.9 arcmin) is indicated by the green ring,… view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (6 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Metallicity distributions of all stars within 15 arcmin (left), and between 15 arcmin and 𝑟𝑡 (right). The solid black line shows the best fit 1D-Gaussian mixture model, with each dashed line identifying the underlying distributions (peaks at −2.11 ± 0.02, −1.83 ± 0.02,…

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: [Fe/H]CaHKsyn against radius in arcmin. Top: All stars with Pmem> 0.1. Each star is coloured by its membership probability. Horizontal lines indicate the peaks of the metallicity distribution presented in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Left: CMD of our conservative 𝜔 Cen sample stars overlaid on the cluster sample. Each point is coloured by its [Fe/H]CaHKsyn. They all follow the broad width of the RGB of 𝜔 Cen. Right: Histogram of the CMD representing a normalised Luminosity function with the conserv…

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: The same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Histogram of our conservative sample between 𝑟𝑡 and 𝑟𝑗 (left) and beyond the Jacobi radius (right). The arrows indicate the measured peaks of the metallicity distributions between 15 arcmin and 𝑟𝑡 (right plot of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Demonstration of the metallicity relationship of different surveys and metallicities scales. Top: Relationship between Pristine-Gaia-synthetic catalogue, and both Mészáros et al. (2021) and APOGEE DR17 (Jönsson et al. 2020). Bottom: Same stars on the top row, but now b…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

113 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

[1]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTION or pop #1...
[2]

Abdurro'uf et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac4414 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJS..259...35A 259, 35

doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac4414 2022
[3]

Ahumada R., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ab929e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJS..249....3A 249, 3

doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab929e 2020
[4]

A., Mucciarelli A., Bellazzini M., Lardo C., Ventura P., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347834 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...681A..54A 681, A54

Alvarez Garay D. A., Mucciarelli A., Bellazzini M., Lardo C., Ventura P., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347834 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...681A..54A 681, A54

doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347834 2024
[5]

Balbinot E., Gieles M., 2018, MNRAS, 474, 2479

2018
[6]

Baumgardt H., Hilker M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1057 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.478.1520B 478, 1520

doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1057 2018
[7]

Baumgardt H., Vasiliev E., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab1474 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.505.5957B 505, 5957

doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1474 2021
[8]

R., Piotto G., Anderson J., Cassisi S., King I

Bedin L. R., Piotto G., Anderson J., Cassisi S., King I. R., Momany Y., Carraro G., 2004, ApJ, 605, L125

2004

Show all 113 references

[9]

C., 2003, MNRAS, 346, L11

Bekki K., Freeman K. C., 2003, MNRAS, 346, L11

2003
[10]

R., Ibata R., 2003, AJ, 125, 188

Bellazzini M., Ferraro F. R., Ibata R., 2003, AJ, 125, 188

2003
[11]

Bellazzini M., Ibata R., Malhan K., Martin N., Famaey B., Thomas G., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202037621 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...636A.107B 636, A107

2020 doi
[12]

R., King I

Bellini A., Piotto G., Bedin L. R., King I. R., Anderson J., Milone A. P., Momany Y., 2009, A & A, 507, 1393

2009
[13]

R., Piotto G., Milone A

Bellini A., Bedin L. R., Piotto G., Milone A. P., Marino A. F., Villanova S., 2010, AJ, 140, 631

2010
[14]

P., Anderson J., Marino A

Bellini A., Milone A. P., Anderson J., Marino A. F., Piotto G., van der Marel R. P., Bedin L. R., King I. R., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7b7e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...844..164B 844, 164

2017 doi
[15]

Bellini A., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa3ec , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...853...86B 853, 86

2018 doi
[16]

W., Koposov S

Belokurov V., Erkal D., Evans N. W., Koposov S. E., Deason A. J., 2018, MNRAS, 478, 611

2018
[17]

Boer de de Boer T. J. L., Gieles M., Balbinot E., H \'e nault-Brunet V., Sollima A., Watkins L. L., Claydon I., 2019, MNRAS, 485, 4906

2019
[18]

Bovy J., 2014, ApJ, 795, 95

2014
[19]

Bovy J., 2015, ApJS, 216, 29

2015
[20]

Buchner J., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/aae7fc , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019PASP..131j8005B 131, 108005

2019 doi
[21]

Buchner J., 2021, @doi [The Journal of Open Source Software] 10.21105/joss.03001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021JOSS....6.3001B 6, 3001

2021 doi
[22]

Buchner J., et al., 2014, A & A, 564, A125

2014
[23]

Calamida A., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aa6397 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AJ....153..175C 153, 175

2017 doi
[24]

Cantat-Gaudin T., et al., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202244784 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...669A..55C 669, A55

2023 doi
[25]

A., 2019, MNRAS, 486, 1667

Carballo-Bello J. A., 2019, MNRAS, 486, 1667

2019
[26]

A., Salinas R., Piatti A

Carballo-Bello J. A., Salinas R., Piatti A. E., 2020, MNRAS, 499, 2157

2020
[27]

Carraro G., Lia C., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0003371 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A&A...357..977C 357, 977

2000 doi arXiv
[28]

Cirasuolo M., et al., 2020, @doi [The Messenger] 10.18727/0722-6691/5195 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020Msngr.180...10C 180, 10

2020 doi
[29]

Clontz C., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8621 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...977...14C 977, 14

2024 doi
[30]

Cordoni G., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aba04b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...898..147C 898, 147

2020 doi
[31]

S., Armandroff T

Da Costa G. S., Armandroff T. E., 1995, AJ, 109, 2533

1995
[32]

S., Coleman M

Da Costa G. S., Coleman M. G., 2008, AJ, 136, 506

2008
[33]

S., Ramsay S

Dalton G., et al., 2012, in McLean I. S., Ramsay S. K., Takami H., eds, Proceedings of the SPIE. SPIE, p. 84460P

2012
[34]

I., Girard T

Dinescu D. I., Girard T. M., van Altena W. F., 1999, AJ, 117, 1792

1999
[35]

Drimmel R., Poggio E., 2018, @doi [Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society] 10.3847/2515-5172/aaef8b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018RNAAS...2..210D 2, 210

2018 doi
[36]

K., Sahlholdt C

Feuillet D. K., Sahlholdt C. L., Feltzing S., Casagrande L., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab2614 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.508.1489F 508, 1489

2021 doi
[37]

C., Rodgers A

Freeman K. C., Rodgers A. W., 1975, @doi [ ] 10.1086/181945 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1975ApJ...201L..71F 201, L71

1975 doi
[38]

Gaia Collaboration et al., 2016, A & A, 595, A1

2016
[39]

Gaia Collaboration et al., 2018a, A & A, 616, A1
[40]

Gaia Collaboration et al., 2018b, A & A, 616, A12
[41]

Gaia Collaboration et al., 2023a, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243940 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...674A...1G 674, A1

doi
[42]

Gaia Collaboration et al., 2023b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347203 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...680A..35G 680, A35

doi
[43]

Ginsburg A., et al., 2019, AJ, 157, 98

2019
[44]

G., Johnson C

Gratton R. G., Johnson C. I., Lucatello S., D'Orazi V., Pilachowski C., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201117093 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...534A..72G 534, A72

2011 doi
[45]

J., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab441d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...884..174G 884, 174

Grillmair C. J., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab441d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...884..174G 884, 174

2019 doi
[46]

J., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5bd7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...929...89G 929, 89

Grillmair C. J., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5bd7 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...929...89G 929, 89

2022 doi
[47]

C., 2001, in Deiters S., Fuchs B., Just A., Spurzem R., Wielen R., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol

Heggie D. C., 2001, in Deiters S., Fuchs B., Just A., Spurzem R., Wielen R., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 228, Dynamics of Star Clusters and the Milky Way. p. 29 ( @eprint arXiv astro-ph/0007336 )

2001 arXiv
[48]

H., Massari D., Veljanoski J., Brown A

Helmi A., Babusiaux C., Koppelman H. H., Massari D., Veljanoski J., Brown A. G. A., 2018, Nature, 563, 85

2018
[49]

Hilker M., Richtler T., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0008500 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000A&A...362..895H 362, 895

2000 doi arXiv
[50]

Hozumi S., Burkert A., 2015, MNRAS, 446, 3100

2015
[51]

D., 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 90

Hunter J. D., 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 90

2007
[52]

A., Gilmore G., Irwin M

Ibata R. A., Gilmore G., Irwin M. J., 1995, MNRAS, 277, 781

1995
[53]

A., Bellazzini M., Malhan K., Martin N., Bianchini P., 2019, Nature Astronomy, 112, 1487

Ibata R. A., Bellazzini M., Malhan K., Martin N., Bianchini P., 2019, Nature Astronomy, 112, 1487

2019
[54]

Ibata R., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad382d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...967...89I 967, 89

2024 doi
[55]

I., Pilachowski C

Johnson C. I., Pilachowski C. A., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/722/2/1373 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...722.1373J 722, 1373

2010 doi
[56]

I., Dupree A

Johnson C. I., Dupree A. K., Mateo M., Bailey John I. I., Olszewski E. W., Walker M. G., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ab8819 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020AJ....159..254J 159, 254

2020 doi
[57]

S., et al., 2019, The Messenger, 175, 3

Jong De de Jong R. S., et al., 2019, The Messenger, 175, 3

2019
[58]

J \"o nsson H., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aba592 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020AJ....160..120J 160, 120

2020 doi
[59]

Kaderali S., Hunt J. A. S., Webb J. J., Price-Jones N., Carlberg R., 2019, MNRAS: Letters, 484, L114

2019
[60]

King I., 1962, AJ, 67, 471

1962
[61]

H., Helmi A., Massari D., Roelenga S., Bastian U., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201834769 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...625A...5K 625, A5

Koppelman H. H., Helmi A., Massari D., Roelenga S., Bastian U., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201834769 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...625A...5K 625, A5

2019 doi
[62]

Kruijssen J. M. D., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa2452 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.498.2472K 498, 2472

2020 doi
[63]

G., Minniti D., Singh H

Kundu R., Fern \'a ndez-Trincado J. G., Minniti D., Singh H. P., Moreno E., Reyl \'e C., Robin A. C., Soto M., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz2500 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.489.4565K 489, 4565

2019 doi
[64]

K \"u pper A. H. W., Kroupa P., Baumgardt H., Heggie D. C., 2010, MNRAS, 401, 105

2010
[65]

B., Ferguson A

Kuzma P. B., Ferguson A. M. N., Pe \ n arrubia J., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab2280 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.507.1127K 507, 1127

2021 doi
[66]

O., Kamann S., Dreizler S., Brinchmann J., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202141791 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...653L...8L 653, L8

Latour M., Calamida A., Husser T. O., Kamann S., Dreizler S., Brinchmann J., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202141791 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...653L...8L 653, L8

2021 doi
[67]

R., Majewski S

Law D. R., Majewski S. R., 2010, ApJ, 718, 1128

2010
[68]

W., Joo J

Lee Y. W., Joo J. M., Sohn Y. J., Rey S. C., Lee H. C., Walker A. R., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1038/46985 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999Natur.402...55L 402, 55

1999 doi
[69]

Leon S., Meylan G., Combes F., 2000, A & A, 359, 907

2000
[70]

O., P \'e rez-Villegas A., Rossi S., Perottoni H

Limberg G., Souza S. O., P \'e rez-Villegas A., Rossi S., Perottoni H. D., Santucci R. M., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8159 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...935..109L 935, 109

2022 doi
[71]

Lindegren L., et al., 2018, A & A, 616, A2

2018
[72]

Lindegren L., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202039709 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...649A...2L 649, A2

2021 doi
[73]

Lucatello S., et al., 2023, @doi [The Messenger] 10.18727/0722-6691/5302 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023Msngr.190...13L 190, 13

2023 doi
[74]

Malhan K., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac67da , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...930L...9M 930, L9

2022 doi
[75]

A., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty912 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.477.4063M 477, 4063

Malhan K., Ibata R. A., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty912 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.477.4063M 477, 4063

2018 doi
[76]

Malhan K., Rix H.-W., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1885 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...964..104M 964, 104

2024 doi
[77]

Malhan K., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4d2a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...926..107M 926, 107

2022 doi
[78]

F., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/731/1/64 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...731...64M 731, 64

Marino A. F., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/731/1/64 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...731...64M 731, 64

2011 doi
[79]

F., et al., 2023, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2308.01344 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv230801344M p

Martin N. F., et al., 2023, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2308.01344 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv230801344M p. arXiv:2308.01344

2023 doi arXiv
[80]

H., Helmi A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201936135 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...630L...4M 630, L4

Massari D., Koppelman H. H., Helmi A., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201936135 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...630L...4M 630, L4

2019 doi
[81]

M \'e sz \'a ros S., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab1208 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.505.1645M 505, 1645

2021 doi
[82]

P., et al., 2017, MNRAS, 469, 800

Milone A. P., et al., 2017, MNRAS, 469, 800

2017
[83]

C., Evans N

Myeong G. C., Evans N. W., Belokurov V., Sanders J. L., Koposov S. E., 2018, MNRAS, 478, 5449

2018
[84]

C., Vasiliev E., Iorio G., Evans N

Myeong G. C., Vasiliev E., Iorio G., Evans N. W., Belokurov V., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz1770 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.488.1235M 488, 1235

2019 doi
[85]

S., et al., 2023, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2309.02503 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv230902503N p

Nitschai M. S., et al., 2023, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2309.02503 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv230902503N p. arXiv:2309.02503

2023 doi arXiv
[86]

S., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5289 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...970..152N 970, 152

Nitschai M. S., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5289 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...970..152N 970, 152

2024 doi
[87]

E., Da Costa G

Norris J. E., Da Costa G. S., 1995, ApJ, 447, 680

1995
[88]

E., Freeman K

Norris J. E., Freeman K. C., Mayor M., Seitzer P., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/310895 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997ApJ...487L.187N 487, L187

1997 doi
[89]

Pagnini G., Di Matteo P., Khoperskov S., Mastrobuono-Battisti A., Haywood M., Renaud F., Combes F., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202245128 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...673A..86P 673, A86

2023 doi
[90]

arXiv:2410.22479

Pagnini G., et al., 2024, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2410.22479 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv241022479P p. arXiv:2410.22479

2024 doi arXiv
[91]

R., Bellazzini M., Piotto G., Zoccali M., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/312658 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...534L..83P 534, L83

Pancino E., Ferraro F. R., Bellazzini M., Piotto G., Zoccali M., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/312658 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...534L..83P 534, L83

2000 doi
[92]

R., Bellazzini M., Piotto G., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06981.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.345..683P 345, 683

Pancino E., Seleznev A., Ferraro F. R., Bellazzini M., Piotto G., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06981.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003MNRAS.345..683P 345, 683

2003
[93]

Pedregosa F., et al., 2011, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825

2011
[94]

M., 2017, @doi [The Journal of Open Source Software] 10.21105/joss.00388 , 2

Price-Whelan A. M., 2017, @doi [The Journal of Open Source Software] 10.21105/joss.00388 , 2

2017 doi
[95]

Price-Whelan A., et al., 2020, adrn/gala: v1.3, @doi 10.5281/zenodo.4159870 , https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4159870

2020 doi
[96]

Sbordone L., et al., 2015, A & A, 579, A104

2015
[97]

D., Cottrell P

Simpson J. D., Cottrell P. L., Worley C. C., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22012.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012MNRAS.427.1153S 427, 1153

2012
[98]

D., et al., 2020, MNRAS, 491, 3374

Simpson J. D., et al., 2020, MNRAS, 491, 3374

2020
[99]

Sollima A., 2020, MNRAS, 495, 2222

2020
[100]

R., Pancino E., Bellazzini M., 2005a, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08646.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MNRAS.357..265S 357, 265

Sollima A., Ferraro F. R., Pancino E., Bellazzini M., 2005a, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08646.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005MNRAS.357..265S 357, 265

2005
[101]

R., Bellazzini M., Straniero O., Pasquini L., 2005b, @doi [ ] 10.1086/496945 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...634..332S 634, 332

Sollima A., Pancino E., Ferraro F. R., Bellazzini M., Straniero O., Pasquini L., 2005b, @doi [ ] 10.1086/496945 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...634..332S 634, 332

doi
[102]

Stoica P., Selen Y., 2004, @doi [IEEE Signal Processing Magazine] 10.1109/MSP.2004.1311138 , 21, 36

2004 arXiv
[103]

J., Simard L., Takami H., eds, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol

Tamura N., et al., 2016, in Evans C. J., Simard L., Takami H., eds, Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series Vol. 9908, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VI. p. 99081M ( @eprint arXiv 1608.01075 ), @doi 10.1117/12.2232103

2016 arXiv
[104]

The Astropy Collaboration et al., 2013, A & A, 558, A33

2013
[105]

The Astropy Collaboration et al., 2018, AJ, 156, 123

2018
[106]

Vasiliev E., Baumgardt H., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab1475 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.505.5978V 505, 5978

2021 doi
[107]

Villanova S., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/517905 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...663..296V 663, 296

2007 doi
[108]

G., Cassisi S., 2014, ApJ, 791, 107

Villanova S., Geisler D., Gratton R. G., Cassisi S., 2014, ApJ, 791, 107

2014
[109]

Virtanen P., et al., 2020, @doi [Nature Methods] 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 , https://rdcu.be/b08Wh 17, 261

2020 doi
[110]

C., Varoquaux G., 2011, arXiv, 13, 22

Walt van van der Walt S., Colbert S. C., Varoquaux G., 2011, arXiv, 13, 22

2011
[111]

Yang Y., Zhao J.-K., Tang X.-Z., Ye X.-H., Zhao G., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/acdee2 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...953..130Y 953, 130

2023 doi
[112]

Youakim K., Lind K., Kushniruk I., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad1952 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.524.2630Y 524, 2630

2023 doi
[113]

M., Rix H.-W., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad1941 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.524.1855Z 524, 1855

Zhang X., Green G. M., Rix H.-W., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad1941 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.524.1855Z 524, 1855

2023 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

write newline

" write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTION or pop #1...

[2] [2]

Abdurro'uf et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ac4414 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJS..259...35A 259, 35

doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac4414 2022

[3] [3]

Ahumada R., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4365/ab929e , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJS..249....3A 249, 3

doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab929e 2020

[4] [4]

A., Mucciarelli A., Bellazzini M., Lardo C., Ventura P., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347834 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...681A..54A 681, A54

Alvarez Garay D. A., Mucciarelli A., Bellazzini M., Lardo C., Ventura P., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347834 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...681A..54A 681, A54

doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347834 2024

[5] [5]

Balbinot E., Gieles M., 2018, MNRAS, 474, 2479

2018

[6] [6]

Baumgardt H., Hilker M., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1057 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.478.1520B 478, 1520

doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1057 2018

[7] [7]

Baumgardt H., Vasiliev E., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab1474 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.505.5957B 505, 5957

doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1474 2021

[8] [8]

R., Piotto G., Anderson J., Cassisi S., King I

Bedin L. R., Piotto G., Anderson J., Cassisi S., King I. R., Momany Y., Carraro G., 2004, ApJ, 605, L125

2004