Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Origin of phonon decoherence

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Phonon decoherence rates are the imaginary part of a non-equilibrium phonon self-energy.

desk verdict A formally grounded derivation of coherent-phonon decoherence from the nonequilibrium self-energy, with a validation that is suggestive but underdetermined by calibrated inputs. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.01529 v1 pith:NOY7UFQA submitted 2025-02-03 cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Yiming Pan , Christoph Emeis , Stephan Jauernik , Michael Bauer , Fabio Caruso This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-elcond-mat.mtrl-sci PACS 63.20.kd63.20.kg
keywords phonondecoherencecoherentphononsnon-equilibriumself-energyelectron-phononcouplingphonon-phononscatteringbismuthantimonysemimetalspump-probespectroscopyfirst-principlescalculations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that the decay of coherent phonons—the oscillating lattice vibrations set in motion by an ultrafast light pulse—has a concrete microscopic origin: the decoherence rate equals the imaginary part, and the frequency shift the real part, of a non-equilibrium phonon self-energy constructed from electron-phonon and phonon-phonon interactions. The authors derive this result from quantum kinetic equations rather than inserting a phenomenological damping term, and they show that existing first-principles machinery can evaluate the relevant self-energies. Applying it to the A1g optical phonon of the semimetals bismuth and antimony, they reproduce the measured pump-fluence dependence and lattice-temperature dependence of the coherent phonon lifetime with quantitative accuracy. The practical payoff is that coherent phonon lifetimes, a central timescale for light-induced structural control, become a calculable material property rather than an adjustable parameter.

What carries the argument

The central object is the non-equilibrium phonon self-energy $\Pi_{\mathbf q\nu}$—a many-body correction describing how a phonon exchanges energy with electrons and with other phonons. For the electron-phonon channel it is built from the retarded density-density response function (Eq. 15); for the phonon-phonon channel it is summed over three-phonon scattering processes weighted by Bose occupation factors (Eq. 23). To make the electron-phonon self-energy usable for coherent modes at the zone center, the paper adopts the self-consistent linewidth approximation (Eq. 24), which replaces the strict energy-conserving delta with a Lorentzian of width $\gamma=15$ meV and thereby restores the intraband transitions that the Fan-Migdal approximation misses. These objects are what convert the exact equation of motion into the damped-oscillator form whose solutions are the observed decaying coherent oscillations.

What would settle it

A time- and angle-resolved photoemission experiment on bismuth at the fluence the paper maps to $T_{\mathrm{el}}=3000$ K, taken simultaneously with a measurement of the A1g decay rate, would settle the point: if the decay rate does not track the instantaneous occupations of the electronic states near the Fermi surface, the quasi-equilibrium mapping used in Eq. (24) fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Starting from a many-body Hamiltonian that avoids the Born-Oppenheimer approximation and couples the phonon displacement to the time-dependent electron density, the paper derives an exact equation of motion for the coherent displacement $U_{\mathbf q\nu}$. The equation has the form of a damped driven oscillator, and the damping emerges rather than being assumed: the decoherence rate is $\Gamma_{\mathbf q\nu}=-\mathrm{Im}\,\Pi_{\mathbf q\nu}^{\mathrm{NA}}$ for electron-phonon coupling and $\Gamma_{\mathbf q\nu}=-\mathrm{Im}\,\Pi_{\mathbf q\nu}^{\mathrm{pp}}$ for phonon-phonon coupling, with frequency renormalization given by $2\omega_{\mathbf q\nu}\mathrm{Re}\,\Pi_{\mathbf q\nu}$. A technical obstacle is that the standard Fan-Migdal self-energy for the electron-phonon channel vanishes exactly at the zone center, where coherent phonons live; the paper overcomes this with a self-consistent linewidth approximation that includes intraband transitions and yields finite decoherence rates. First-principles calculations for the A1g mode in Bi and Sb then give lifetimes that shrink with rising electronic temperature (pump fluence) and with rising lattice temperature, in agreement with pump-probe experiments; the paper concludes that electron-phonon and phonon-phonon scattering each dominate decoherence in different experimentally accessible regimes.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a photoexcited semimetal behaves as if its electrons have one temperature set by the pump intensity while the lattice keeps its own temperature; if the real electron distribution is not of this two-temperature form, the computed fluence dependence is not a clean test of the self-energy formula.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Coherent phonon lifetimes in semimetals can be computed from ground-state electronic structure plus electronic and lattice temperatures, so experiments can be interpreted without a full time-dependent simulation.
  • The phenomenological damping terms used in earlier coherent-phonon models are replaced by specific self-energy diagrams, giving a physical meaning to each contribution to the decay.
  • In bismuth and antimony, electron-phonon scattering controls decoherence at high pump fluences and low lattice temperature, while phonon-phonon scattering dominates at high lattice temperature; the two channels have different signatures that experiments can separate.
  • The Fan-Migdal approximation alone is inadequate for coherent phonons at the Brillouin-zone center, and the self-consistent linewidth correction becomes necessary for any material where a Raman-active or A1g-like mode is studied.
  • The same formalism extends to other driven solids, so the timescales of light-induced phase transitions and structural switching can be predicted from first principles.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The effective-temperature mapping from pump fluence to a single electronic temperature is the least controlled step in the calculation; I would test it by computing the same lifetimes with a time-resolved non-equilibrium occupation and checking whether the decay rate follows the instantaneous distribution rather than a Fermi-Dirac one.
  • If the self-energy view is right, decoherence and equilibrium phonon linewidths are the same object only when occupations are thermal; out of equilibrium, stimulated-emission and absorption channels can differ, so a coherent phonon in a strongly pumped material could decay faster or slower than any equilibrium linewidth would suggest.
  • A natural extension is to multimode coherent states: because self-energy contributions are additive at linear order, the framework predicts a hierarchy of decoherence times for simultaneously excited modes, which multi-color pump-probe experiments could map.
  • The framework should be testable in insulators and semiconductors with intense mid-infrared pumping, where the electron-phonon channel is weak and anharmonic decay should set the lifetime; a failure of the predicted temperature scaling there would point to missing electron-hole or four-phonon terms.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives quantum kinetic equations for coherent phonons from a non-adiabatic electron-phonon Hamiltonian extended with cubic anharmonicity, and identifies the decoherence rate and frequency renormalization with the imaginary and real parts of the non-equilibrium phonon self-energy (Eqs. 13-15 and 21-23). It then evaluates these expressions for the A1g mode of Bi and Sb using first-principles electron-phonon and phonon-phonon calculations, comparing the resulting coherent-phonon lifetimes with fluence-dependent and temperature-dependent pump-probe experiments (Fig. 3). The paper concludes that both electron-phonon and phonon-phonon scattering contribute to decoherence, with the former controlling the fluence dependence and the latter controlling the temperature dependence.

Significance. If the formal mapping between coherent-phonon decoherence and the non-equilibrium phonon self-energy is correct, this is a valuable bridge between coherent phonon dynamics and existing equilibrium self-energy implementations. The manuscript has clear strengths: the derivation starts from an explicit many-body Hamiltonian, the final expressions reduce to known equilibrium self-energies when distributions are thermalized, the problem of the vanishing Fan-Migdal rate at q=0 is addressed through a self-consistent linewidth scheme, and the computational setup uses widely available first-principles tools. However, the numerical validation currently relies on several external or empirical inputs, so the reported agreement with experiments is not yet an independent confirmation of the formalism. The main text is not self-contained for the key validation steps, and the quantitative claims are stronger than the evidence presented.

major comments (4)
  1. [§III, Eq. (24) and Figs. 2(b),(e)] The finite zone-center rate Γ_SL_A1g is produced by replacing the energy-conserving delta function with a Lorentzian of width γ = 15 meV, described only as 'representative of the electron linewidths.' Because the Fan-Migdal rate vanishes exactly at q=0, the quoted electron-phonon decoherence rates Γ_ep ≈ 0.9 ps⁻¹ (Bi) and 0.4 ps⁻¹ (Sb) are controlled by this uncomputed width rather than by the ab initio couplings alone. The authors should provide a sensitivity study over γ, or preferably compute the electron linewidths that enter the self-consistent scheme, before the electron-phonon channel can be regarded as quantitatively predictive.
  2. [§III, Fig. 3(a)-(b) and text after Eq. (24)] The x-axis of the fluence comparison is an effective electronic temperature obtained from the experimental fluence through a prescription confined to the Supplemental Material. The main text states that the temperatures are 'chosen to reproduce the experimental conditions,' but it does not show the conversion or list its assumptions, such as absorbed fraction, electronic specific heat, or thermalization time. If any part of this mapping is adjustable, the reported τ ∝ 1/T_el agreement with experiment can be shifted along the x-axis and is not an independent test of Eq. (24). The conversion and its material-specific parameters should be presented in the main text or at least summarized with a sensitivity analysis.
  3. [§III, text after Eq. (25) and Figs. 3(c)-(d)] The phonon-phonon comparison introduces an empirical constant rate Γ_eff_A1g taken from Refs. [50,51], which are analyses of the same experiments whose data are plotted in the figure. Adding this offset makes the absolute agreement partly constructed rather than predicted. The authors should either compute the residual rate from an independent mechanism, clearly label it as a fit parameter, or restrict the validation claim to the temperature slope. A related uncontrolled simplification is the neglect of photoexcited phonon distributions in Γ_pp, which the manuscript acknowledges but does not quantify; this affects the separation of the fluence dependence into an electron-phonon part and a temperature-only phonon-phonon part.
  4. [§II B, Eq. (7)] The displayed Heisenberg equation of motion is incorrect as written. For a coordinate U and conjugate momentum P, the double commutator [U,[U,H]] is proportional to [U,P] and does not yield the acceleration term; the correct form is d²U/dt² = −ℏ⁻²⟨[H,[U,H]]⟩ (equivalently +ℏ⁻²⟨[[U,H],H]⟩), which is what leads to Eq. (8). This appears to be a typographical error, but since Eq. (7) is the stated starting point of the central derivation, it should be corrected and the corresponding steps in the Supplemental Material should be checked.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Conclusions] The phrases 'robust agreement' and 'good quantitative agreement' overstate the evidence given the empirical constants and calibrated temperatures; 'consistent with' or similar wording would be more proportionate unless the above issues are resolved.
  2. [Fig. 3 caption] The caption contains a typo: 'ans Sb' should read 'and Sb'.
  3. [General] The manuscript depends heavily on the Supplemental Material for both the derivation leading to Eqs. (12)-(15) and the fluence-to-temperature mapping; if the SM is not included with the arXiv posting, the referees and readers cannot assess these steps. The authors should ensure the SM is available and its equations are numbered for cross-reference.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the decoherence rate is derived from the non-equilibrium phonon self-energy, and the numerical validation, while containing some calibrated inputs, does not reduce its central claim to those inputs by construction.

full rationale

The central derivation connects the coherent-phonon equation of motion to the imaginary and real parts of non-equilibrium self-energies (Eqs. 12-15 and 21-23). The paper explicitly derives these equations from the Hamiltonian and cross-checks them against equilibrium self-energy expressions; nothing in the derivation presupposes the experimentally measured decoherence times. The numerical section uses external benchmarks (pump-probe data from Refs. 17, 50, 51, 53) and independent first-principles inputs (DFT/EPW). Calibrated quantities appear: the effective electronic temperatures are chosen to match the experimental fluence conditions, the Lorentzian width gamma = 15 meV is set as representative, and an effective constant rate Gamma_eff from Refs. 50/51 is added to absorb residual offsets. These are acknowledged inputs and post-hoc corrections, not hidden inversions of the target data, and they do not enter the formal self-energy identities. The manuscript also openly states that calculations overestimate lifetimes without phonon-phonon coupling and that photoexcited phonon distributions are omitted; such limitations weaken numerical completeness but do not make the derivation circular. No self-citation is load-bearing: Ref. 53 supports the displacive-excitation context, and Refs. 18/64-67 are background. Accordingly, no step reduces to its own input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central formulas are derived within standard many-body perturbation theory, so the ledger contains no invented entities. The independent content is limited by the quasi-equilibrium ansatz for the excited state and by the externally chosen values of Tel, gamma, and Gamma_eff. The phonon distribution is assumed to stay at the lattice temperature even under electronic excitation, which the authors explicitly flag.

free parameters (3)
  • Effective electronic temperature Tel = Bi: 3000 K, Sb: 1450 K; varied up to 4500 K
    Chosen to reproduce the fluence conditions of Refs. [17,53]; the mapping from fluence to Tel is deferred to the Supplemental Material.
  • Lorentzian broadening gamma in SL approximation = 15 meV
    Set by hand as representative of electron linewidths; the computed decoherence rate at the zone center depends on this width.
  • Effective residual decoherence rate Gamma_eff = Bi: 0.05 ps^-1, Sb: 0.1 ps^-1
    Added to the phonon-phonon rate to remove a constant offset with experiment; taken from Refs. [50,51].
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Third-order anharmonicities in the Born-Oppenheimer approximation; fourth-order and non-adiabatic phonon-phonon terms neglected
    Sec. II C; this restricts phonon-phonon dissipation to cubic anharmonicity, which determines the standard lowest-order self-energy.
  • domain assumption Small-displacement expansion to second order and linear response for the electronic density
    Sec. II A-B; the derivation of Eq. (12) assumes delta_n responds linearly to delta_V_ion and that terms beyond second order in U can be dropped.
  • domain assumption Quasi-equilibrium occupations: electrons Fermi-Dirac at Tel, phonons Bose-Einstein at Tph
    Sec. III; the nonequilibrium self-energy is evaluated with hot Fermi-Dirac and equilibrium Bose-Einstein distributions, explicitly omitting phonon heating and nonthermal carriers.
  • domain assumption BBGKY hierarchy is closed by factorizing three-phonon correlations and neglecting off-diagonal self-energy contributions
    Sec. II C; this truncation is needed to reduce Eqs. (19)-(20) to Eq. (23), and its accuracy is not quantified in the main text.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Origin of phonon decoherence." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/NOY7UFQA

@misc{pith2026250201529,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Origin of phonon decoherence},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/NOY7UFQA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.01529}
}
read the original abstract

Phonon decoherence determines the characteristic timescales over which coherent lattice vibrations decay, making it a crucial process for understanding the non-equilibrium dynamics of crystal lattices after excitation by a pump pulse. Here, we report a theoretical and computational investigation of the origin of phonon decoherence within a first-principles many-body framework. We derive quantum kinetic equations for the dynamics of coherent phonons by explicitly accounting for dissipation processes induced by electron-phonon and phonon-phonon interactions. The decoherence rate and frequency renormalization are formulated in terms of the non-equilibrium phonon self energy, providing a framework amenable for ab initio calculations. To validate this approach, we conduct a first-principles study of phonon decoherence for the elemental semimetals antimony and bismuth. The robust agreement with available temperature- and fluence-dependent experimental data confirms the accuracy of our theoretical and computational framework. More generally, our findings reveal that either electron-phonon and phonon-phonon coupling can prevail in determining the decoherence time, depending on the temperature and driving conditions. Overall, this work fills a critical gap in the theoretical understanding of phonon decoherence, providing a predictive framework for determining the timescales of light-induced structural dynamics in driven solids.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.01529 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the characteristic flue [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Phonon dispersion of Bi (a) and Sb (d) along the high [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Coherent phonon lifetime of the A1g mode for Bi and Sb as a function of electronic temperature [(a)-(b)] and lattice temperature [(c)-(d)]. The experimental data are taken from Ref. [17, 50] for Bi, and Ref. [51, 53] for Sb. The total lifetime τ tot A1g is reported in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. The First Principles Equation for Coherent Phonons: Dynamics and Polaron distortions

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A first-principles equation of motion for coherent phonons is derived, with renormalized frequencies and a damping term identical to quantum phonons, plus a new screened electron-phonon coupling.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    J. G. Horstmann, H. B¨ ockmann, B. Wit, F. Kurtz, G. Storeck, and C. Ropers, Coherent control of a surface structural phase transition, Nature 583, 232 (2020)

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    ( 1)-(3), we expect the effects of decoher- ence to be encoded in the density fluctuation δn(r,t )

    is an exact result for the Hamiltonian specified by Eqs. ( 1)-(3), we expect the effects of decoher- ence to be encoded in the density fluctuation δn(r,t ). To retrieve an explicit expression for the decoherence rate mediated by the electron-phonon coupling, we express δn(r,t ) making use of linear response theory: δn(r,t ) = δn(r,t 0) (9) + ∫ dr′ ∫ t t0 dt′...

  3. [3]

    Y. Qi, M. Guan, D. Zahn, T. Vasileiadis, H. Seiler, Y. W. Windsor, H. Zhao, S. Meng, and R. Ernstorfer, Travers- ing double-well potential energy surfaces: Photoinduced concurrent intralayer and interlayer structural transitions in XTe2 (X = Mo, W), ACS Nano 16, 11124 (2022)

    work page 2022

  4. [4]

    Guan, X.-B

    M.-X. Guan, X.-B. Liu, D.-Q. Chen, X.-Y. Li, Y.-P. Qi, Q. Yang, P.-W. You, and S. Meng, Optical control of mul- tistage phase transition via phonon coupling in MoTe 2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 015702 (2022)

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    X. Li, T. Qiu, J. Zhang, E. Baldini, J. Lu, A. M. Rappe, and K. A. Nelson, Terahertz field in- duced ferroelectricity in quantum paraelectric SrTiO 3, Science 364, 1079 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    de la Torre, D

    A. de la Torre, D. M. Kennes, M. Claassen, S. Gerber, J. W. McIver, and M. A. Sentef, Colloquium: Nonther- mal pathways to ultrafast control in quantum materials, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 041002 (2021)

    2021

  7. [7]

    F¨ orst, C

    M. F¨ orst, C. Manzoni, S. Kaiser, Y. Tomioka, Y. Tokura, R. Merlin, and A. Cavalleri, Nonlinear phononics as an ultrafast route to lattice control, Nat. Phys. 7, 854 (2011)

    2011

  8. [8]

    How- ever, since Eq

    resembles the equation of motion of a un- damped driven harmonic oscillator, which is reflected by the absence of a term proportional to ∂U qν/∂t . How- ever, since Eq. (

Show all 82 references
  1. [9]

    as: δn(r,t ) = δn(r,t 0) +δnA(r,t ) +δnNA(r,t ) . (10) The adiabatic density response arises from the instan- taneous response of the density [ 32, 33] to the nuclear displacement Uqν , and it can be derived by assum- ing a parametric dependence in the form δnA(r,t ) = δnA(r;U...

  2. [10]

    Inspection of the decoherence rate (Fig

    alone systematically over- estimate the experimental lifetime. Inspection of the decoherence rate (Fig. S1 in the SM [ 34]) reveals un- derestimation by a constant offset, suggesting the pres- ence of additional interaction mechanisms – independent of Tel – contributing to the ...

  3. [11]

    Scholz, T

    R. Scholz, T. Pfeifer, and H. Kurz, Density-matrix theory of coherent phonon oscillations in germanium, Phys. Rev. B 47, 16229 (1993)

    1993

  4. [12]

    M. Y. Zhang, Z. X. Wang, Y. N. Li, L. Y. Shi, D. Wu, T. Lin, S. J. Zhang, Y. Q. Liu, Q. M. Liu, J. Wang, T. Dong, and N. L. Wang, Light- induced subpicosecond lattice symmetry switch in MoTe2, Phys. Rev. X 9, 021036 (2019)

    2019

  5. [13]

    by considering the Fan-Migdal approximation (FM) to the phonon self-energy Π NA qν due to electron-phonon coupling. To explicitly account for the energy transferred to the electrons by a pump pulse, we describe electronic occupations via a Fermi-Dirac dis- tribution with an el...

  6. [14]

    Merlin, Generating coherent THz phonons with light pulses, Solid State Commun

    R. Merlin, Generating coherent THz phonons with light pulses, Solid State Commun. 102, 207 (1997) , highlights in Condensed Matter Physics and Materials Science

    1997

  7. [15]

    with the non- adiabatic phonon self-energy derived within the equi- librium Green’s function formalism enables the appli- cation of the available implementations for the phonon self-energy to study decoherence and softening of coher- ent phonons. In particular, the phonon self...

  8. [16]

    Mankowsky, A

    R. Mankowsky, A. von Hoegen, M. F¨ orst, and A. Cav- alleri, Ultrafast reversal of the ferroelectric polarizat ion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 197601 (2017)

    2017

  9. [17]

    S. W. Teitelbaum, T. Shin, J. W. Wolfson, Y.-H. Cheng, I. J. P. Molesky, M. Kandyla, and K. A. Nelson, Real- time observation of a coherent lattice transformation into a high-symmetry phase, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031081 (2018)

    2018

  10. [18]

    M. Guan, D. Chen, Q. Chen, Y. Yao, and S. Meng, Coherent phonon assisted ultrafast order-parameter reversal and hidden metallic state in Ta 2NiSe5, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 256503 (2023)

    2023

  11. [19]

    and ( 20) are the first terms of the Bo- goliubov–Born–Green–Kirkwood–Yvon (BBGKY) hier- archy, which recast the equation of motion for the n-th order correlator, in terms of correlators of order n + 1. In order to close the equation, we can derive the equation of motion for ⟨ ...

  12. [20]

    D. M. Juraschek, M. Fechner, and N. A. Spaldin, Ul- trafast structure switching through nonlinear phononics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 054101 (2017)

    2017

  13. [21]

    Numerical evaluation of Γ pp A1g at room temperature (Tph = 300 K) for the A1g mode of Sb and Bi yields 0.26 and 0.15 ps −1, respectively

    and ( 23), leading to: Γ pp qν =π 2 ∑ q′q′′ν ′ν ′′ |Ψ ν,ν ′,ν ′′ −q, q′, q′′ |2 (25) × [ (nq′ν ′ +nq′′ν ′′ + 1)δ(ω q′ν ′ +ω q′′ν ′′ −ω qν ) + 2(nq′′ν ′′ −nq′ν ′ )δ(ω q′ν ′ −ω q′′ν ′′ −ω qν ) ] . Numerical evaluation of Γ pp A1g at room temperature (Tph = 300 K) for the A1g mod...

    2000

  14. [22]

    D. M. Juraschek, Q. N. Meier, and P. Narang, Paramet- ric excitation of an optically silent goldstone-like phono n mode, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 117401 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    A detailed derivation of this result is reported in the SM [ 34]

    coincides with the phonon self-energy obtained within the equilibrium Green function formal- ization [ 45–49]. A detailed derivation of this result is reported in the SM [ 34]. Overall, these results formally relates the deco- herence rate and frequency renormalization of cohe...

  16. [24]

    2 (b) and (e) for momenta along the T-Γ-K path

    is reported in red in Figs. 2 (b) and (e) for momenta along the T-Γ-K path. Away from Γ, the de- coherence rate Γ SL qν coincides with the result of the Fan- Migdal approximation Γ FM qν , however, the two approxi- mations differ significantly at the zone center. Specifi- cally, ...

    2000

  17. [25]

    G. A. Garrett, T. F. Albrecht, J. F. Whitaker, and R. Merlin, Coherent THz phonons driven by light pulses and the Sb problem: What is the mechanism?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3661 (1996)

    1996

  18. [26]

    Qi, Y.-H

    T. Qi, Y.-H. Shin, K.-L. Yeh, K. A. Nelson, and A. M. Rappe, Collective coherent control: Synchronization of polarization in ferroelectric PbTiO 3 by shaped THz fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 247603 (2009)

    2009

  19. [27]

    D. M. Juraschek and S. F. Maehrlein, Sum-frequency ionic raman scattering, Phys. Rev. B 97, 174302 (2018)

    2018

  20. [28]

    Caruso and M

    F. Caruso and M. Zacharias, Quantum the- ory of light-driven coherent lattice dynamics, Phys. Rev. B 107, 054102 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    Bauer, A

    R. Bauer, A. Schmid, P. Pavone, and D. Strauch, Electron-phonon coupling in the metallic elements al, au, na, and nb: A first-principles study, Phys. Rev. B 57, 11276 (1998)

    1998

  22. [30]

    Cappelluti, Electron-phonon effects on the raman spectrum in Mgb 2, Phys

    E. Cappelluti, Electron-phonon effects on the raman spectrum in Mgb 2, Phys. Rev. B 73, 140505 (2006)

    2006

  23. [31]

    A. M. Saitta, M. Lazzeri, M. Calandra, and F. Mauri, Giant nonadiabatic effects in layer metals: Ra- man spectra of intercalated graphite explained, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 226401 (2008)

    2008

  24. [32]

    C.-H. Park, F. Giustino, M. L. Cohen, and S. G. Louie, Electron-phonon interactions in graphene, bilayer graphene, and graphite, Nano Lett. 8, 4229 (2008)

    2008

  25. [33]

    Lazzeri, S

    M. Lazzeri, S. Piscanec, F. Mauri, A. C. Fer- rari, and J. Robertson, Phonon linewidths and electron-phonon coupling in graphite and nanotubes, Phys. Rev. B 73, 155426 (2006)

    2006

  26. [34]

    Calandra, G

    M. Calandra, G. Profeta, and F. Mauri, Adiabatic and nonadiabatic phonon dispersion in a wannier function ap- proach, Phys. Rev. B 82, 165111 (2010)

    2010

  27. [35]

    Giustino, M

    F. Giustino, M. L. Cohen, and S. G. Louie, Electron-phonon interaction using wannier functions, Phys. Rev. B 76, 165108 (2007)

    2007

  28. [36]

    Caruso, M

    F. Caruso, M. Hoesch, P. Achatz, J. Serrano, M. Krisch, E. Bustarret, and F. Giustino, Nonadia- batic kohn anomaly in heavily boron-doped diamond, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 017001 (2017)

    2017

  29. [37]

    Novko, F

    D. Novko, F. Caruso, C. Draxl, and E. Cappel- luti, Ultrafast hot phonon dynamics in MgB 2 driven by anisotropic electron-phonon coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 077001 (2020) . 9

    2020

  30. [38]

    Marini, Nonadiabatic effects lead to the breakdown of the semiclassical phonon picture, Phys

    A. Marini, Nonadiabatic effects lead to the breakdown of the semiclassical phonon picture, Phys. Rev. B 110, 024306 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    Cheng, S

    Y.-H. Cheng, S. W. Teitelbaum, F. Y. Gao, and K. A. Nelson, Femtosecond laser amorphization of tellurium, Phys. Rev. B 98, 134112 (2018)

    2018

  32. [40]

    Stefanucci, R

    G. Stefanucci, R. van Leeuwen, and E. Perfetto, In and out-of-equilibrium ab initio theory of electrons and phonons, Phys. Rev. X 13, 031026 (2023)

    2023

  33. [41]

    van Leeuwen, First-principles ap- proach to the electron-phonon interaction, Phys

    R. van Leeuwen, First-principles ap- proach to the electron-phonon interaction, Phys. Rev. B 69, 115110 (2004)

    2004

  34. [42]

    Baroni, S

    S. Baroni, S. de Gironcoli, A. Dal Corso, and P. Giannozzi, Phonons and related crystal prop- erties from density-functional perturbation theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 73, 515 (2001)

    2001

  35. [43]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. de Gironcoli, P. Pavone, and S. Baroni, Ab initio calculation of phonon dispersions in semicon- ductors, Phys. Rev. B 43, 7231 (1991)

    1991

  36. [44]

    [ 68–72] are in- cluded in SI

    See Supplemental Material at [URL], Ref. [ 68–72] are in- cluded in SI

  37. [45]

    Giustino, Electron-phonon interactions from first prin- ciples, Rev

    F. Giustino, Electron-phonon interactions from first prin- ciples, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 015003 (2017)

    2017

  38. [46]

    Berges, N

    J. Berges, N. Girotto, T. Wehling, N. Marzari, and S. Ponc´ e, Phonon self-energy corrections: To screen, or not to screen, Phys. Rev. X 13, 041009 (2023)

    2023

  39. [47]

    Marini, Equilibrium and out-of-equilibrium re- alistic phonon self-energy free from overscreening, Phys

    A. Marini, Equilibrium and out-of-equilibrium re- alistic phonon self-energy free from overscreening, Phys. Rev. B 107, 024305 (2023)

    2023

  40. [48]

    Caldarelli, A

    G. Caldarelli, A. Guandalini, F. Macheda, and F. Mauri, Variational formulation of dynamical electronic response functions in presence of nonlocal exchange interactions, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2410.22889 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Stefanucci and E

    G. Stefanucci and E. Perfetto, Exact formula with two dynamically screened electron-phonon cou- plings for positive phonon-linewidths approximations, Phys. Rev. B 111, 024307 (2025)

    2025

  42. [50]

    L. Sun, P. Kumar, Z. Liu, J. Choi, B. Fang, S. Roesch, K. Tran, J. Casara, E. Priego, Y.-M. Chang, G. Moody, K. L. Silverman, V. O. Lorenz, M. Scheibner, T. Luo, and X. Li, Phonon dephasing dynamics in MoS 2, Nano Lett. 21, 1434 (2021)

    2021

  43. [51]

    C. J. Sayers, A. Genco, C. Trovatello, S. D. Conte, V. O. Khaustov, J. Cervantes-Villanueva, D. San- galli, A. Molina-Sanchez, C. Coletti, C. Gader- maier, and G. Cerullo, Strong coupling of coher- ent phonons to excitons in semiconducting monolayer MoTe2, Nano Lett. 23, 9235 (2023)

    2023

  44. [52]

    Trovatello, H

    C. Trovatello, H. P. C. Miranda, A. Molina-S´ anchez, R. Borrego-Varillas, C. Manzoni, L. Moretti, L. Ganzer, M. Maiuri, J. Wang, D. Dumcenco, A. Kis, L. Wirtz, A. Marini, G. Soavi, A. C. Ferrari, G. Cerullo, D. San- galli, and S. D. Conte, Strongly coupled coherent phonons in...

    2020

  45. [53]

    T. Y. Jeong, B. M. Jin, S. H. Rhim, L. Debbichi, J. Park, Y. D. Jang, H. R. Lee, D.-H. Chae, D. Lee, Y.-H. Kim, S. Jung, and K. J. Yee, Coherent lattice vibrations in mono- and few-layer WSe 2, ACS Nano 10, 5560 (2016)

    2016

  46. [54]

    W. Li, J. Carrete, N. A. Katcho, and N. Mingo, Sheng- BTE: A solver of the boltzmann transport equation for phonons, Comput. Phys. Commun. 185, 1747 (2014)

    2014

  47. [55]

    Lazzeri, M

    M. Lazzeri, M. Calandra, and F. Mauri, An- harmonic phonon frequency shift in MgB 2, Phys. Rev. B 68, 220509 (2003)

    2003

  48. [56]

    R. A. Cowley, Anharmonic crystals, Rep. Prog. Phys. 31, 123 (1968)

    1968

  49. [57]

    B. V. Thompson, Neutron scattering by an anharmonic crystal, Phys. Rev. 131, 1420 (1963)

    1963

  50. [58]

    A. A. Maradudin and A. E. Fein, Scattering of neutrons by an anharmonic crystal, Phys. Rev. 128, 2589 (1962)

    1962

  51. [59]

    Lax, Quantum relaxation, the shape of lat- tice absorption and inelastic neutron scattering lines, J

    M. Lax, Quantum relaxation, the shape of lat- tice absorption and inelastic neutron scattering lines, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 25, 487 (1964)

    1964

  52. [60]

    M. Hase, K. Mizoguchi, H. Harima, S.-i. Nakashima, and K. Sakai, Dynamics of coherent phonons in bismuth generated by ultrashort laser pulses, Phys. Rev. B 58, 5448 (1998)

    1998

  53. [61]

    M. Hase, K. Ushida, and M. Kitajima, Anhar- monic decay of coherent optical phonons in antimony, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 84, 024708 (2015)

    2015

  54. [62]

    Ishioka and O

    K. Ishioka and O. V. Misochko, Suppression of shear ionic motions in bismuth by coupling with large-amplitude in- ternal displacement, Phys. Rev. B 110, 094313 (2024)

    2024

  55. [63]

    Emeis, S

    C. Emeis, S. Jauernik, S. Dahiya, Y. Pan, C. E. Jensen, P. Hein, M. Bauer, and F. Caruso, Coherent Phonons and Quasiparticle Renormalization in Semimetals from First Principles, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2407.17118 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Ponc´ e, E

    S. Ponc´ e, E. Margine, C. Verdi, and F. Giustino, Epw: Electron–phonon coupling, transport and superconduct- ing properties using maximally localized wannier func- tions, Comp. Phys. Commun. 209, 116 (2016)

    2016

  57. [65]

    Giannozzi, O

    P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. B. Nardelli, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, M. Cococcioni, et al. , Advanced capabili- ties for materials modelling with quantum ESPRESSO, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 29, 465901 (2017)

    2017

  58. [66]

    Pizzi, V

    G. Pizzi, V. Vitale, R. Arita, S. Bl¨ ugel, F. Freimuth, G. G´ eranton, M. Gibertini, D. Gresch, C. John- son, T. Koretsune, J. Iba˜ nez-Azpiroz, H. Lee, J.- M. Lihm, D. Marchand, A. Marrazzo, Y. Mokrousov, J. I. Mustafa, Y. Nohara, Y. Nomura, L. Paulatto, S. Ponc´ e, T. Ponwe...

    2020

  59. [67]

    H. J. Zeiger, J. Vidal, T. K. Cheng, E. P. Ip- pen, G. Dresselhaus, and M. S. Dresselhaus, The- ory for displacive excitation of coherent phonons, Phys. Rev. B 45, 768 (1992)

    1992

  60. [68]

    A. V. Kuznetsov and C. J. Stanton, Theory of coherent phonon oscillations in semiconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 3243 (1994)

    1994

  61. [69]

    J. J. Li, J. Chen, D. A. Reis, S. Fahy, and R. Merlin, Opti- cal probing of ultrafast electronic decay in bi and sb with slow phonons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 047401 (2013)

    2013

  62. [70]

    Novko, Nonadiabatic coupling effects in MgB 2 reex- amined, Phys

    D. Novko, Nonadiabatic coupling effects in MgB 2 reex- amined, Phys. Rev. B 98, 041112 (2018)

    2018

  63. [71]

    J.-M. Lihm, S. Ponc´ e, and C.-H. Park, Self-consistent electron lifetimes for electron-phonon scattering, Phys. Rev. B 110, L121106 (2024)

    2024

  64. [72]

    Park, Non-adiabatic phonon self- energy due to electrons with finite linewidths, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2411.12221 (2024)

    C.-H. Park, Non-adiabatic phonon self- energy due to electrons with finite linewidths, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2411.12221 (2024)

    2024

  65. [73]

    Bonini, M

    N. Bonini, M. Lazzeri, N. Marzari, and F. Mauri, Phonon anharmonicities in graphite and graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 176802 (2007) . 10

    2007

  66. [74]

    Caruso, Nonequilibrium lattice dynamics in monolayer MoS2, J

    F. Caruso, Nonequilibrium lattice dynamics in monolayer MoS2, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 12, 1734 (2021)

    2021

  67. [75]

    Caruso and D

    F. Caruso and D. Novko, Ultrafast dynamics of electrons and phonons: from the two-temperature model to the time-dependent boltzmann equation, Adv. Phys.: X 7, 2095925 (2022)

    2022

  68. [76]

    Pan and F

    Y. Pan and F. Caruso, Vibrational dichroism of chiral valley phonons, Nano Lett. 23, 7463 (2023)

    2023

  69. [77]

    Pan and F

    Y. Pan and F. Caruso, Strain-induced activa- tion of chiral-phonon emission in monolayer WS 2, npj 2D Mater. Appl. 8, 42 (2024)

    2024

  70. [78]

    D. R. Hamann, Optimized norm-conserving vanderbilt pseudopotentials, Phys. Rev. B 88, 085117 (2013)

    2013

  71. [79]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Gen- eralized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  72. [80]

    G. D. Mahan, Many-particle Physics (Springer New York, NY, 2000)

    2000

  73. [81]

    P. B. Allen, Neutron spectroscopy of superconductors, Phys. Rev. B 6, 2577 (1972)

    1972

  74. [82]

    S. L. Johnson, P. Beaud, E. Vorobeva, C. J. Milne, E. D. Murray, S. Fahy, and G. Ingold, Directly observing squeezed phonon states with femtosecond x-ray diffrac- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 175503 (2009)

    2009

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.