Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 3 cited by

Integrable deformations of dimensionally reduced gravity

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper constructs two families of deformations of dimensionally reduced gravity that preserve its Lax integrable structure, proving Hamiltonian integrability for one of them.

desk verdict AFD part is a solid, citable integrable-deformation result; the Yang-Baxter part is a promising construction whose full-model integrability is not actually shown, so the abstract overclaims. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.01750 v2 pith:MJIL4HC6 submitted 2025-02-03 hep-th gr-qcnlin.SI

Mattia Cesàro , David Osten This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-thgr-qcnlin.SI MSC 37K1037J3583C05
keywords classicalintegrabilitydimensionallyreducedgravityLaxconnectionauxiliaryfielddeformationYang-BaxterGerochgroupdilatonr-matrix
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Dimensional reduction of Einstein gravity to two dimensions along two commuting Killing isometries produces a classically integrable system: a coset sigma model coupled to a dilaton and a scale factor, whose integrability is protected by the infinite-dimensional Geroch group. This paper asks how far that system can be deformed without losing its Lax integrable structure, and it answers with two explicit families. The Auxiliary Field Deformation adds auxiliary fields together with an arbitrary function of a composite invariant, and the paper shows that its flat Lax connection, its deformed Virasoro constraints, and its classical r-matrix all survive; because the Dirac bracket of the physical fields coincides with the Poisson bracket of the undeformed theory, the model is integrable in the Hamiltonian sense as well. The Yang-Baxter deformation embeds a standard integrable sigma-model deformation into the dilaton-gravity system, identifying the deformation parameter with the dilaton itself, and is shown to admit a flat Lax connection whose consistency forces the dilaton to obey a beta-function-like equation of motion. If the constructions hold, they produce new integrable gravitational theories where exact solution-generating methods remain available.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing objects are the undeformed Lax connection with its spectral parameter, the auxiliary-field construction, and the Yang-Baxter deformation of the coset current. The undeformed Lax connection (2.26) carries the dynamics of the dilaton $\rho$, the conformal factor $\sigma$, and the $\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{R})/\mathrm{SO}(2)$ coset field, with the spacetime-dependent spectral parameter $\gamma$ determined by $\rho$ and its dual; the centrally extended version (2.37) makes the Hamiltonian analysis tractable. The Auxiliary Field Deformation works through auxiliary fields $\chi_1,\chi_2,v$ whose algebraic equations of motion satisfy the symmetry property (3.11); this property is what guarantees flatness of the deformed Lax connection (3.21) exactly when the physical equations hold, and the Dirac-bracket argument used for coset models shows the canonical structure of the Lax matrix is unchanged. The Yang-Baxter deformation works through an $R$-operator solving the modified classical Yang-Baxter equation, a deformed current $K$ defined by (4.9), and the identification $\eta=C\rho$, which makes the deformed Maurer-Cartan identity (4.10) take the standard Yang-Baxter form; the spectral parameter then obeys the first-order equation (4.15), whose integrability condition is the dilaton's equation of motion.

What would settle it

For the Yang-Baxter model, compute the Poisson bracket of the spatial Lax matrix (4.12) for a concrete coset such as $\mathrm{SL}(2,\mathbb{R})/\mathrm{SO}(2)$: if it cannot be cast in Maillet form (2.49) for any classical $r$-matrix, the model is Lax-integrable but not Hamiltonian-integrable, which would show the two families genuinely differ. For the Auxiliary Field Deformation, take a specific deformation function $E(\nu)$ and check numerically that the deformed conserved charges are in involution on the constraint surface; a violation would refute the Hamiltonian integrability claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For the undeformed model, the equations of motion are equivalent to flatness of the Lax connection (2.26) with a dynamical spectral parameter built from the dilaton. The paper extends this to two deformed Lagrangians. For the Auxiliary Field Deformation (3.1), flatness of the Lax connection (3.21) is equivalent to the deformed equations of motion (3.4)-(3.5), the deformed Virasoro constraints (3.25) follow from the same twisted self-duality structure as the undeformed linear system, and the canonical analysis shows that the Dirac bracket for the physical fields equals their Poisson bracket, so the undeformed r-matrix (2.48) puts the Lax matrix into Maillet form (2.49): infinitely many conserved charges in involution therefore exist. For the Yang-Baxter deformation (4.1), with the deformation parameter identified with the dilaton via $\eta=C\rho$, the deformed current $K$ satisfies the standard modified Yang-Baxter Maurer-Cartan identity (4.10), and the flat Lax connection (4.12) is consistent if and only if the dilaton obeys the $\beta$-function-like equation (4.17), which is precisely its equation of motion (4.5). The two families differ structurally: the auxiliary-field construction preserves the underlying Witt-Virasoro-extended Geroch symmetry, while the Yang-Baxter deformation changes the algebraic structure enough that only Lax integrability, not Hamiltonian integrability, is established.

Load-bearing premise

The Yang-Baxter deformation's integrability hinges on the identification $\eta=C\rho$ between the deformation parameter and the dilaton; under any other relation the deformed current would not satisfy the standard Yang-Baxter Maurer-Cartan identity, and the constructed Lax connection would not be flat.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Both deformed models admit flat Lax connections; for the Auxiliary Field Deformation the associated conserved charges are proven to Poisson-commute, so it is integrable in the Hamiltonian sense as well as the Lax sense.
  • At linear order in the deformation parameter, the Auxiliary Field Deformation reproduces a $\mathrm{T}\bar{\mathrm{T}}$-like deformation of the gravity-dilaton-coset system, with the naive energy-momentum tensor $t_{\pm\pm}$ of (3.18) entering the deformed Lagrangian, and it generically introduces higher-derivative terms while preserving integrability.
  • For the Yang-Baxter model, the dilaton equation of motion takes the beta-function form (4.17) with $\beta(\rho)=1-c^2C^2\rho^2$, so the dilaton can be interpreted as running along an RG flow with world-sheet time as RG time.
  • The auxiliary-field deformation preserves the Geroch-group-based solution-generating machinery, so exact solution techniques for the undeformed theory continue to apply within the deformed family.
  • The paper's outlook indicates that other integrable deformations of symmetric-space sigma models (bi-Yang-Baxter, Wess-Zumino, $\lambda$-deformations) can likely be embedded into dimensionally reduced gravity in the same way.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • One may read the auxiliary-field result as evidence of a general principle: any deformation of a coset model that preserves the algebraic constraint structure (3.11) can be coupled to the dilaton-gravity sector without breaking integrability, which would give a systematic recipe for building further gravitational integrable models.
  • Because the Yang-Baxter deformation treats the dilaton as the deformation parameter, it may provide a dynamical mechanism in which gravitational evolution drives the effective coupling along its RG flow; whether this survives quantization or lifts to a higher-dimensional origin remains open.
  • A testable consequence distinguishes the two integrability notions: for the Yang-Baxter model one should check whether its Lax matrix can be put into Maillet form; a negative answer would yield a model that is Lax-integrable but not Hamiltonian-integrable.
  • The unchanged $r$-matrix of the auxiliary-field deformation suggests a mild, $\mathrm{T}\bar{\mathrm{T}}$-like deformation; a natural open direction is to compute the deformed $S$-matrix or spectrum and look for the characteristic level-flow of $\mathrm{T}\bar{\mathrm{T}}$-like theories, which the paper does not address.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper studies two integrable deformations of the two-dimensional theory obtained by reducing four-dimensional general relativity along two commuting Killing fields. Section 3 introduces an auxiliary-field deformation (3.1), constructs a Lax connection (3.21) and a centrally extended version (3.29), derives modified Virasoro constraints (3.25), and gives a Hamiltonian argument that the undeformed r-matrix (2.48) is preserved. Section 4 introduces a Yang-Baxter deformed action (4.1) with deformation parameter tied to the dilaton by η = Cρ, derives the equations of motion (4.5)–(4.7), and provides a Lax connection (4.12) whose flatness is controlled by a dynamical spectral-parameter condition (4.15). The abstract claims that both families preserve the Lax integrable structure of dimensionally reduced gravity, with the auxiliary-field family additionally integrable in the Hamiltonian sense.

Significance. If fully established, the auxiliary-field result is a valuable extension of the Ferko–Smith deformation programme to a gravitational system with dilaton and conformal factor, and the observation that the classical r-matrix is unchanged is a clean and potentially useful structural result. The Yang-Baxter embedding is also interesting because it gives the spacetime-dependent deformation parameter a physical interpretation as the dilaton and connects integrable sigma-model deformations with the RG-flow structure of [33]. The AFD part is supported by substantial appendix computations, and the strategy of proving Hamiltonian integrability by showing that the Dirac bracket reduces to the Poisson bracket is compelling. However, the significance of the second family is conditional: as written, the Yang-Baxter section establishes at most Lax integrability of the matter-plus-ρ sector, not of the full dimensionally reduced gravity system.

major comments (4)
  1. [§4.3, App. D.2] The Lax connection (4.12) contains only K(0), K(1), ρ, and the spectral parameter γ; it does not contain σ or central/Virasoro generators. Its flatness, together with the spectral-parameter condition (4.15), is shown to reproduce the ρ equation (4.5) assuming the matter equation (4.7), but it says nothing about the σ equation (4.6) or about Virasoro constraints. Appendix D.2 explicitly states that 'we do not consider the dynamics of σ here' and that the derivation of Virasoro constraints goes beyond the scope of the paper. Therefore the abstract's claim that the Yang-Baxter deformation preserves the Lax integrable structure of dimensionally reduced gravity is not established for the full model; either the missing σ/Virasoro part must be supplied or the claim must be explicitly restricted to the matter-plus-ρ sector.
  2. [§4.3, paragraph after (4.18)] The paper itself concedes that a natural constant-spectral-parameter Lax connection 'reproduces the correct ρ and σ equations of motion, but not the one of K.' This is the same gap from a different angle: full Lax integrability of the deformed model would require a connection whose flatness is equivalent to all equations of motion, including (4.7). In its current form, the Yang-Baxter section therefore proves flatness of a Lax connection for a truncated subsystem, not for the full deformed gravity-dilaton-coset model.
  3. [§3.3.1, Eq. (3.23), App. B] The flatness equivalence for the auxiliary-field Lax connection relies on the identities ϵμν∂μρPν = ϵμνRμPν and ∂μρPμ = RμPμ stated in (3.23). These identities are asserted without proof and are not immediate, since they involve the elimination of the auxiliary fields through equations (3.7)–(3.9). Appendix B says they 'can in turn be proven with the aid of (3.11)' but does not provide the proof. Since these identities are load-bearing for the central claim that flatness of (3.21) is equivalent to the deformed equations of motion, the derivation should be included or a precise reference supplied.
  4. [§3.4, Eqs. (3.40)–(3.41)] The Hamiltonian integrability proof rests on the assertion that the Dirac bracket correction vanishes because (M^{-1})ΦΦ = 0. The text only gives the schematic block form of the 12×12 constraint matrix and states the needed property of its inverse; it does not exhibit the matrix or prove the vanishing. Because this vanishing is the entire reason that the Dirac bracket for the physical fields coincides with the Poisson bracket and hence that the undeformed Maillet bracket computation goes through unchanged, the explicit computation or a rigorous argument for (M^{-1})ΦΦ = 0 should be provided.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2.1.2, Eq. (2.43)] The display around (2.43) appears typeset incorrectly: the second equality contains a bare '= [Aμ, Bν] ...' that seems to be the right-hand side of a product formula but is not aligned with a left-hand side. Please check and repair the equation.
  2. [App. C.1, Eqs. (C.5)–(C.10)] The residue computation leading from (C.5) to the relations (C.9)–(C.10) skips several intermediate steps involving the pole structure of Γ^{-1}∂γΓ. A few explanatory lines would make the derivation reproducible without guessing.
  3. [§5, Outlook] The text contains the citation placeholder '[?, ?, ?]' for AdS2 dilaton-gravity with potentials and Yang-Baxter deformations; these references should be filled in before publication.
  4. [§4.1, Eqs. (4.2)–(4.4)] The constant C appears both as the proportionality constant in η = Cρ and, after absorbing C into R, as a parameter in the modified Yang-Baxter equation (4.2). The explanation is understandable, but a sentence explicitly distinguishing the original C from the rescaled R-operator would prevent confusion.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular reduction: both deformations' Lax pairs are constructed and verified, with no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. For the Auxiliary Field Deformation, the Lax connection (3.21) is an explicit ansatz whose flatness is verified in Appendix B against the deformed equations of motion (3.4)-(3.5) together with the algebraic auxiliary-field equations, and the sigma equation (3.6) is derived from the tau-infinity-derived Virasoro constraint (3.25) in Appendix C.2 rather than being assumed as an input. The Hamiltonian integrability claim rests on a direct computation: because (M^{-1})_{\Phi\Phi}=0, the Dirac bracket of the physical fields equals their Poisson bracket (3.42), and the bracket of the Lax matrix is checked to be of Maillet form (2.49); the undeformed r-matrix is recovered as a consequence of that computation, not used as an input. The deformation function E(nu) is left arbitrary and is not fitted to the target equations. For the Yang-Baxter deformation, the identification eta = C rho is an explicitly stated modelling assumption (Section 4.1) needed to put the Maurer-Cartan identity in the standard Yang-Baxter form; it is not a parameter fit. The Lax pair (4.12) is the standard constant-coupling ansatz, and beta(rho) in (4.4) is fixed by requiring the spectral-parameter integrability condition (4.16) to reproduce the rho equation of motion (4.5). The admitted omission of sigma dynamics and Virasoro constraints for the Yang-Baxter family (Appendix D.2) is an incompleteness or overclaim concern, not circularity: the paper explicitly says those are beyond its scope. No self-citation is load-bearing; [46] is cited for comparison, while the needed bracket computations are performed in the present paper.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivations rest on the classical integrability framework for dimensionally reduced gravity, on the enlarged linear system of Julia-Nicolai, and on two explicit construction choices: the AFD Lax ansatz and the eta = C rho identification. None of these are fitted to data; they are structural assumptions.

free parameters (2)
  • deformation function E(nu) = arbitrary function
    Arbitrary function defining the auxiliary field deformation in (3.1); the Lax construction works for any smooth E.
  • constant C in eta = C rho = real constant
    Identifies the Yang-Baxter deformation parameter with the dilaton (4.1). A modeling assumption, not fitted to data.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Dimensionally reduced gravity takes the coset sigma model coupled to dilaton and 2D gravity form (2.20) with Virasoro constraints (2.22).
    Standard KK reduction of 4D GR along two commuting isometries, cited from [5,48-50].
  • domain assumption The enlarged linear system with W x sl(2) hat structure and the twisted self-duality constraint holds.
    Imported from [52,15]; the deformed Virasoro constraints in appendix C are derived using the same structure.
  • ad hoc to paper The Lax ansatz (3.21) for the auxiliary field deformation, obtained by the heuristic substitutions (3.28).
    The flatness proof verifies the ansatz, and the substitutions are identified by analogy with [37,46].
  • ad hoc to paper The Yang-Baxter deformation parameter is tied to the dilaton as eta = C rho.
    Stated in Section 4.1 as necessary for the Maurer-Cartan identity (4.10) to match the standard Yang-Baxter form.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Integrable deformations of dimensionally reduced gravity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/MJIL4HC6

@misc{pith2026250201750,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Integrable deformations of dimensionally reduced gravity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/MJIL4HC6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.01750}
}
abstract

Dimensional reduction of gravity theories to $D=2$ along commuting Killing isometries is well-known to be classically integrable. The resulting system typically features a coset $\sigma$-model coupled to a dilaton and a scale factor of the dimensional reduction. In this article, we construct two families of deformations of dimensionally reduced gravity that preserve the Lax integrable structure. The first family is an extension of the Auxiliary Field Deformation recently introduced by Ferko and Smith, while the second family consists in the embedding of the Yang-Baxter $\sigma$-model into $D=2$ dimensionally reduced gravity. For both deformations we construct flat Lax representations. The Auxiliary Field Deformation, in particular, preserves the rich algebraic structure underlying the undeformed model and, leaving the canonical structure of the Lax connection's spatial components essentially unchanged, allows us to prove its integrability also in the Hamiltonian sense.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Time-Dependent Integrability from Gauge Theory, I

    hep-th 2026-07 accept novelty 7.5 of 10

    Spacetime-dependent 4d Chern-Simons theory generates time-dependent integrable field theories whose allowed time dependence coincides with one-loop RG flow while preserving Lax integrability.

  2. Duality-covariant particles and exotic branes

    hep-th 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Proposes enlarged worldline models with coadjoint orbit terms and generalized worldvolume theories for exotic branes that make E8 duality covariance manifest in a Hamiltonian formulation.

  3. Soliton Surfaces and the Geometry of Integrable Deformations of the $\mathbb{CP}^{N-1}$ Model

    hep-th 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Instanton solutions with vanishing energy-momentum tensor remain solutions under analytic TTbar-like deformations, and the deformed CP^{N-1} model is equivalent to the undeformed model on a field-dependent unit-determ...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

103 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [33]

    Hoare, N

    B. Hoare, N. Levine, and A. A. Tseytlin, Sigma models with local couplings: a new integrability – RG flow connection , JHEP 11 (2020) 020, [ arXiv:2008.01112]

    arXiv 2020

  2. [1]

    R. P. Geroch, A Method for generating new solutions of Einstein ’s equation. 2 , J. Math. Phys. 13 (1972) 394–404

    1972

  3. [2]

    R. P. Geroch, A Method for generating solutions of Einstein ’s equations , J. Math. Phys. 12 (1971) 918–924

    1971

  4. [3]

    Julia, Infinite Lie algebras in physics , in 5th Johns Hopkins Workshop on Current Problems in Particle Theory: Unified Field Theories and Beyond , pp

    B. Julia, Infinite Lie algebras in physics , in 5th Johns Hopkins Workshop on Current Problems in Particle Theory: Unified Field Theories and Beyond , pp. 23–41, 6, 1981

    1981

  5. [4]

    Julia, Group disintegrations, Conf

    B. Julia, Group disintegrations, Conf. Proc. C 8006162 (1980) 331–350

    1980

  6. [5]

    Breitenlohner and D

    P. Breitenlohner and D. Maison, On the Geroch Group , Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Phys. Theor. 46 (1987) 215

    1987

  7. [6]

    V. A. Belinsky and V. E. Zakharov, Integration of the Einstein Equations by the Inverse Scattering Problem Technique and the Calculation of the Exact Soliton Solutions, Sov. Phys. JETP 48 (1978) 985–994

    1978

  8. [7]

    Maison, Are the stationary, axially symmetric Einstein equations completely integrable?, Phys

    D. Maison, Are the stationary, axially symmetric Einstein equations completely integrable?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41 (1978) 521

    1978

Show all 103 references
  1. [8]

    Korotkin and H

    D. Korotkin and H. Nicolai, Separation of variables and Hamiltonian formulation for the Ernst equation , Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1995) 1272–1275, [ hep-th/9412072]

    1995 arXiv

  2. [9]

    Korotkin and H

    D. Korotkin and H. Nicolai, Isomonodromic quantization of dimensionally reduced gravity, Nucl. Phys. B 475 (1996) 397–439, [ hep-th/9605144]

    1996 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Korotkin and H

    D. Korotkin and H. Samtleben, Quantization of coset space sigma models coupled to two-dimensional gravity , Commun. Math. Phys. 190 (1997) 411–457, [hep-th/9607095]

    1997 arXiv

  4. [11]

    Korotkin and H

    D. Korotkin and H. Samtleben, Poisson realization and quantization of the Geroch group, Class. Quant. Grav. 14 (1997) L151–L156, [ gr-qc/9611061]

    1997 arXiv

  5. [12]

    Nicolai, The Integrability of N = 16 Supergravity, Phys

    H. Nicolai, The Integrability of N = 16 Supergravity, Phys. Lett. B 194 (1987) 402

    1987

  6. [13]

    Nicolai and N

    H. Nicolai and N. P. Warner, The Structure of N = 16 Supergravity in Two-dimensions, Commun. Math. Phys. 125 (1989) 369

    1989

  7. [14]

    Bossard, F

    G. Bossard, F. Ciceri, G. Inverso, A. Kleinschmidt, and H. Samtleben, E9 exceptional field theory. Part I. The potential , JHEP 03 (2019) 089, [arXiv:1811.04088]. 34

    2019 arXiv

  8. [15]

    Bossard, F

    G. Bossard, F. Ciceri, G. Inverso, A. Kleinschmidt, and H. Samtleben, E9 exceptional field theory. Part II. The complete dynamics , JHEP 05 (2021) 107, [arXiv:2103.12118]

    2021 arXiv

  9. [16]

    Bossard, F

    G. Bossard, F. Ciceri, G. Inverso, and A. Kleinschmidt, Maximal D = 2 supergravities from higher dimensions , JHEP 01 (2024) 046, [ arXiv:2309.07232]

    2024 arXiv

  10. [17]

    L. T. Cole and P. Weck, Integrability in gravity from Chern-Simons theory , JHEP 10 (2024) 080, [ arXiv:2407.08782]

    2024 arXiv

  11. [18]

    Costello, E

    K. Costello, E. Witten, and M. Yamazaki, Gauge Theory and Integrability, I , ICCM Not. 06 (2018), no. 1 46–119, [ arXiv:1709.09993]

    2018 arXiv

  12. [19]

    R. G. Leigh, A. C. Petkou, P. M. Petropoulos, and P. K. Tripathy, The Geroch group in Einstein spaces , Class. Quant. Grav. 31 (2014), no. 22 225006, [arXiv:1403.6511]

    2014 arXiv

  13. [20]

    Ortiz and H

    T. Ortiz and H. Samtleben, SO(9) supergravity in two dimensions , JHEP 01 (2013) 183, [ arXiv:1210.4266]

    2013 arXiv

  14. [21]

    Lopes Cardoso, D

    G. Lopes Cardoso, D. Mayorga Pe˜ na, and S. Nampuri,Classical integrability in the presence of a cosmological constant: analytic and machine learning results , Fortsch. Phys. 2025 (4, 2024) 2400267, [ arXiv:2404.18247]

    2025 arXiv

  15. [22]

    Driezen, Modave Lectures on Classical Integrability in 2d Field Theories , PoS Modave2021 (2022) 002, [ arXiv:2112.14628]

    S. Driezen, Modave Lectures on Classical Integrability in 2d Field Theories , PoS Modave2021 (2022) 002, [ arXiv:2112.14628]

    2022 arXiv

  16. [23]

    Klimˇ c ´ ık,Yang-Baxter sigma models and dS/AdS T duality , JHEP 12 (2002) 051, [hep-th/0210095]

    C. Klimˇ c ´ ık,Yang-Baxter sigma models and dS/AdS T duality , JHEP 12 (2002) 051, [hep-th/0210095]

    2002 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Klimˇ c ´ ık,On integrability of the Yang-Baxter sigma-model , J

    C. Klimˇ c ´ ık,On integrability of the Yang-Baxter sigma-model , J. Math. Phys. 50 (2009) 043508, [ arXiv:0802.3518]

    2009 arXiv

  18. [25]

    Delduc, M

    F. Delduc, M. Magro, and B. Vicedo, An integrable deformation of the AdS 5×S5 superstring action, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014), no. 5 051601, [ arXiv:1309.5850]

    2014 arXiv

  19. [26]

    Sfetsos, Integrable interpolations: From exact CFTs to non-Abelian T-duals , Nucl

    K. Sfetsos, Integrable interpolations: From exact CFTs to non-Abelian T-duals , Nucl. Phys. B880 (2014) 225–246, [ arXiv:1312.4560]

    2014 arXiv

  20. [27]

    Klimcik, Yang-Baxter σ-model with WZNW term as E-model, Phys

    C. Klimcik, Yang-Baxter σ-model with WZNW term as E-model, Phys. Lett. B 772 (2017) 725–730, [ arXiv:1706.08912]

    2017 arXiv

  21. [28]

    Delduc, M

    F. Delduc, M. Magro, and B. Vicedo, Integrable double deformation of the principal chiral model, Nucl. Phys. B 891 (2015) 312–321, [ arXiv:1410.8066]. 35

    2015 arXiv

  22. [29]

    C. A. S. Young, Non-local charges, Z(m) gradings and coset space actions , Phys. Lett. B632 (2006) 559–565, [ hep-th/0503008]

    2006 arXiv

  23. [30]

    Hoare, Integrable deformations of sigma models , J

    B. Hoare, Integrable deformations of sigma models , J. Phys. A 55 (2022), no. 9 093001, [arXiv:2109.14284]

    2022 arXiv

  24. [31]

    Osten, Lax pairs for new ZN -symmetric coset σ-models and their Yang-Baxter deformations, Nucl

    D. Osten, Lax pairs for new ZN -symmetric coset σ-models and their Yang-Baxter deformations, Nucl. Phys. B 981 (2022) 115856, [ arXiv:2112.07438]

    2022 arXiv

  25. [32]

    Osten, Heterotic integrable deformation of the principal chiral model , Phys

    D. Osten, Heterotic integrable deformation of the principal chiral model , Phys. Rev. D 109 (2024), no. 10 106021, [ arXiv:2312.10149]

    2024 arXiv

  26. [34]

    E. A. Ivanov and B. M. Zupnik, N=3 supersymmetric Born-Infeld theory , Nucl. Phys. B 618 (2001) 3–20, [ hep-th/0110074]

    2001 arXiv

  27. [35]

    E. A. Ivanov and B. M. Zupnik, New representation for Lagrangians of selfdual nonlinear electrodynamics, in 4th International Workshop on Supersymmetry and Quantum Symmetries: 16th Max Born Symposium , pp. 235–250, 2002. hep-th/0202203

    2002 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Ferko, S

    C. Ferko, S. M. Kuzenko, L. Smith, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, Duality-invariant nonlinear electrodynamics and stress tensor flows , Phys. Rev. D 108 (2023), no. 10 106021, [ arXiv:2309.04253]

    2023 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Ferko and L

    C. Ferko and L. Smith, An Infinite Family of Integrable Sigma Models Using Auxiliary Fields, arXiv:2405.05899

    arXiv

  30. [38]

    A. B. Zamolodchikov, Expectation value of composite field T anti-T in two-dimensional quantum field theory , hep-th/0401146

    arXiv

  31. [39]

    Cavagli` a, S

    A. Cavagli` a, S. Negro, I. M. Sz´ ecs´ enyi, and R. Tateo,T ¯T -deformed 2D Quantum Field Theories, JHEP 10 (2016) 112, [ arXiv:1608.05534]

    2016 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Babaei-Aghbolagh, K

    H. Babaei-Aghbolagh, K. B. Velni, D. M. Yekta, and H. Mohammadzadeh, Emergence of non-linear electrodynamic theories from TT ¯-like deformations , Phys. Lett. B 829 (2022) 137079, [ arXiv:2202.11156]

    2022 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Ferko, A

    C. Ferko, A. Sfondrini, L. Smith, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, Root-T ¯T Deformations in Two-Dimensional Quantum Field Theories , Phys. Rev. Lett. 129 (2022), no. 20 201604, [ arXiv:2206.10515]. 36

    2022 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Borsato, C

    R. Borsato, C. Ferko, and A. Sfondrini, Classical integrability of root-TT¯ flows, Phys. Rev. D 107 (2023), no. 8 086011, [ arXiv:2209.14274]

    2023 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Fukushima and K

    O. Fukushima and K. Yoshida, 4D Chern-Simons theory with auxiliary fields , arXiv:2407.02204

    arXiv

  36. [44]

    Bielli, C

    D. Bielli, C. Ferko, L. Smith, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, Integrable Higher-Spin Deformations of Sigma Models from Auxiliary Fields , arXiv:2407.16338

    arXiv

  37. [45]

    Bielli, C

    D. Bielli, C. Ferko, L. Smith, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, Auxiliary Field Sigma Models and Yang-Baxter Deformations , arXiv:2408.09714

    arXiv

  38. [46]

    Ces` aro, A

    M. Ces` aro, A. Kleinschmidt, and D. Osten,Integrable auxiliary field deformations of coset models , JHEP 11 (2024) 028, [ arXiv:2409.04523]

    2024 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Bielli, C

    D. Bielli, C. Ferko, L. Smith, and G. Tartaglino-Mazzucchelli, Auxiliary Field Deformations of (Semi-)Symmetric Space Sigma Models , arXiv:2409.05704

    arXiv

  40. [48]

    Katsimpouri, Integrability in two-dimensional gravity

    D. Katsimpouri, Integrability in two-dimensional gravity . PhD thesis, Humboldt U., Berlin, 2015

    2015

  41. [49]

    Nicolai, Two-dimensional gravities and supergravities as integrable system , Lect

    H. Nicolai, Two-dimensional gravities and supergravities as integrable system , Lect. Notes Phys. 396 (1991) 231–273

    1991

  42. [50]

    Nicolai, D

    H. Nicolai, D. Korotkin, and H. Samtleben, Integrable classical and quantum gravity, in NATO Advanced Study Institute on Quantum Fields and Quantum Space Time, pp. 203–243, 12, 1996. hep-th/9612065

    1996 arXiv

  43. [51]

    Pohlmeyer, Integrable Hamiltonian Systems and Interactions Through Quadratic Constraints, Commun

    K. Pohlmeyer, Integrable Hamiltonian Systems and Interactions Through Quadratic Constraints, Commun. Math. Phys. 46 (1976) 207–221

    1976

  44. [52]

    Julia and H

    B. Julia and H. Nicolai, Conformal internal symmetry of 2-d sigma models coupled to gravity and a dilaton , Nucl. Phys. B 482 (1996) 431–465, [ hep-th/9608082]

    1996 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Paulot, Selfduality of d=2 reduction of gravity coupled to a sigma-model , Phys

    L. Paulot, Selfduality of d=2 reduction of gravity coupled to a sigma-model , Phys. Lett. B 609 (2005) 367–371, [ hep-th/0412157]

    2005 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Maison, GEROCH GROUP AND INVERSE SCATTERING METHOD , in Conference on Nonlinear Evolution Equations: Integrability and Spectral Methods , 12, 1988

    D. Maison, GEROCH GROUP AND INVERSE SCATTERING METHOD , in Conference on Nonlinear Evolution Equations: Integrability and Spectral Methods , 12, 1988

    1988

  47. [55]

    Hou and W

    B.-Y. Hou and W. Lee, Virasoro Algebra in the Solution Space of the Ernst Equation, Lett. Math. Phys. 13 (1987) 1–6. [Erratum: Lett.Math.Phys. 14, 383 (1987)]. 37

    1987

  48. [56]

    Nicolai, New linear systems for 2-D Poincare supergravities , Nucl

    H. Nicolai, New linear systems for 2-D Poincare supergravities , Nucl. Phys. B 414 (1994) 299–328, [ hep-th/9309052]

    1994 arXiv

  49. [57]

    Bernard and N

    D. Bernard and N. Regnault, Poisson algebra of 2-D dimensionally reduced gravity, JHEP 05 (2000) 017, [ hep-th/0002207]

    2000 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Bernard and N

    D. Bernard and N. Regnault, New Lax pair for 2D dimensionally reduced gravity , J. Phys. A 34 (2001) 2343–2352

    2001

  51. [59]

    Lacroix, B

    S. Lacroix, B. Vicedo, and C. A. S. Young, Cubic hypergeometric integrals of motion in affine Gaudin models , arXiv:1804.06751

    arXiv

  52. [60]

    Lacroix, Lectures on classical Affine Gaudin models , 12, 2023

    S. Lacroix, Lectures on classical Affine Gaudin models , 12, 2023. arXiv:2312.13849

    2023 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Korotkin and H

    D. Korotkin and H. Samtleben, Yangian symmetry in integrable quantum gravity , Nucl. Phys. B 527 (1998) 657–689, [ hep-th/9710210]

    1998 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Samtleben, Classical and quantum symmetries in models of dimensionally reduced gravity

    H. Samtleben, Classical and quantum symmetries in models of dimensionally reduced gravity. PhD thesis, Hamburg U., 1998

    1998

  55. [63]

    J. M. Maillet, Hamiltonian Structures for Integrable Classical Theories From Graded Kac-moody Algebras, Phys. Lett. B 167 (1986) 401–405

    1986

  56. [64]

    Maillet, New integrable canonical structures in two-dimensional models , Nuclear Physics B 269 (1986), no

    J.-M. Maillet, New integrable canonical structures in two-dimensional models , Nuclear Physics B 269 (1986), no. 1 54 – 76

    1986

  57. [65]

    Lacroix, Integrable models with twist function and affine Gaudin models

    S. Lacroix, Integrable models with twist function and affine Gaudin models . PhD thesis, Lyon, Ecole Normale Superieure, 2018. arXiv:1809.06811

    2018 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Kawaguchi, T

    I. Kawaguchi, T. Matsumoto, and K. Yoshida, Jordanian deformations of the AdS5×S5 superstring, JHEP 04 (2014) 153, [ arXiv:1401.4855]

    2014 arXiv

  59. [67]

    T. J. Hollowood, J. L. Miramontes, and D. M. Schmidtt, Integrable Deformations of Strings on Symmetric Spaces , JHEP 11 (2014) 009, [ arXiv:1407.2840]

    2014 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Kawaguchi, T

    I. Kawaguchi, T. Matsumoto, and K. Yoshida, A Jordanian deformation of AdS space in type IIB supergravity , JHEP 06 (2014) 146, [ arXiv:1402.6147]

    2014 arXiv

  61. [69]

    Matsumoto and K

    T. Matsumoto and K. Yoshida, Yang–Baxter sigma models based on the CYBE , Nucl. Phys. B893 (2015) 287–304, [ arXiv:1501.03665]

    2015 arXiv

  62. [70]

    Hoare and S

    B. Hoare and S. J. van Tongeren, On jordanian deformations of AdS 5 and supergravity, J. Phys. A49 (2016), no. 43 434006, [ arXiv:1605.03554]. 38

    2016 arXiv

  63. [71]

    Matsumoto and K

    T. Matsumoto and K. Yoshida, Lunin-Maldacena backgrounds from the classical Yang-Baxter equation - towards the gravity/CYBE correspondence , JHEP 06 (2014) 135, [ arXiv:1404.1838]

    2014 arXiv

  64. [72]

    S. J. van Tongeren, Yang–Baxter deformations, AdS/CFT, and twist-noncommutative gauge theory , Nucl. Phys. B904 (2016) 148–175, [arXiv:1506.01023]

    2016 arXiv

  65. [73]

    Osten and S

    D. Osten and S. J. van Tongeren, Abelian Yang–Baxter deformations and TsT transformations, Nucl. Phys. B915 (2017) 184–205, [ arXiv:1608.08504]

    2017 arXiv

  66. [74]

    Hoare and A

    B. Hoare and A. A. Tseytlin, Homogeneous Yang-Baxter deformations as non-abelian duals of the AdS 5 sigma-model, J. Phys. A49 (2016), no. 49 494001, [arXiv:1609.02550]

    2016 arXiv

  67. [75]

    Borsato and L

    R. Borsato and L. Wulff, Integrable Deformations of T -Dual σ Models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117 (2016), no. 25 251602, [ arXiv:1609.09834]

    2016 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Borsato and L

    R. Borsato and L. Wulff, On non-abelian T-duality and deformations of supercoset string sigma-models, JHEP 10 (2017) 024, [ arXiv:1706.10169]

    2017 arXiv

  69. [77]

    Delduc, M

    F. Delduc, M. Magro, and B. Vicedo, On classical q-deformations of integrable sigma-models, JHEP 11 (2013) 192, [ arXiv:1308.3581]

    2013 arXiv

  70. [78]

    Delduc, M

    F. Delduc, M. Magro, and B. Vicedo, Derivation of the action and symmetries of the q-deformed AdS5 × S5 superstring, JHEP 10 (2014) 132, [ arXiv:1406.6286]

    2014 arXiv

  71. [79]

    Hoare and A

    B. Hoare and A. A. Tseytlin, Type IIB supergravity solution for the T-dual of the η-deformed AdS5× S5 superstring, JHEP 10 (2015) 060, [ arXiv:1508.01150]

    2015 arXiv

  72. [80]

    Arutyunov, S

    G. Arutyunov, S. Frolov, B. Hoare, R. Roiban, and A. A. Tseytlin, Scale invariance of the η-deformed AdS5×S5 superstring, T-duality and modified type II equations, Nucl. Phys. B903 (2016) 262–303, [ arXiv:1511.05795]

    2016 arXiv

  73. [81]

    Hoare and S

    B. Hoare and S. J. van Tongeren, Non-split and split deformations of AdS5, J. Phys. A49 (2016), no. 48 484003, [ arXiv:1605.03552]

    2016 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Borsato and L

    R. Borsato and L. Wulff, Target space supergeometry of η and λ-deformed strings, JHEP 10 (2016) 045, [ arXiv:1608.03570]

    2016 arXiv

  75. [83]

    Orlando, S

    D. Orlando, S. Reffert, J.-i. Sakamoto, and K. Yoshida, Generalized type IIB supergravity equations and non-Abelian classical r-matrices , J. Phys. A49 (2016), no. 44 445403, [ arXiv:1607.00795]. 39

    2016 arXiv

  76. [84]

    Borsato and L

    R. Borsato and L. Wulff, Marginal deformations of WZW models and the classical Yang–Baxter equation, J. Phys. A52 (2019), no. 22 225401, [ arXiv:1812.07287]

    2019 arXiv

  77. [85]

    Hoare and F

    B. Hoare and F. K. Seibold, Supergravity backgrounds of the η-deformed AdS2×S2×T6 and AdS5×S5 superstrings, JHEP 01 (2019) 125, [arXiv:1811.07841]

    2019 arXiv

  78. [86]

    S. J. van Tongeren, Unimodular jordanian deformations of integrable superstrings , SciPost Phys. 7 (2019) 011, [ arXiv:1904.08892]

    2019 arXiv

  79. [87]

    Delduc, S

    F. Delduc, S. Lacroix, M. Magro, and B. Vicedo, A unifying 2d action for integrable σ-models from 4d Chern-Simons theory , arXiv:1909.13824

    1909 arXiv

  80. [88]

    Levine, Equivalence of 1-loop RG flows in 4d Chern-Simons and integrable 2d sigma-models, arXiv:2309.16753

    N. Levine, Equivalence of 1-loop RG flows in 4d Chern-Simons and integrable 2d sigma-models, arXiv:2309.16753

    arXiv

  81. [89]

    Vicedo, Deformed integrable σ-models, classical R-matrices and classical exchange algebra on Drinfel’d doubles , J

    B. Vicedo, Deformed integrable σ-models, classical R-matrices and classical exchange algebra on Drinfel’d doubles , J. Phys. A48 (2015), no. 35 355203, [arXiv:1504.06303]

    2015 arXiv

  82. [90]

    Hoare, N

    B. Hoare, N. Levine, and A. A. Tseytlin, Integrable 2d sigma models: quantum corrections to geometry from RG flow , arXiv:1907.04737

    1907 arXiv

  83. [91]

    Michel and B

    Y. Michel and B. Pioline, Higher derivative corrections, dimensional reduction and Ehlers duality , JHEP 09 (2007) 103, [ arXiv:0706.1769]

    2007 arXiv

  84. [92]

    Lambert and P

    N. Lambert and P. C. West, Enhanced Coset Symmetries and Higher Derivative Corrections, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006) 065002, [ hep-th/0603255]

    2006 arXiv

  85. [93]

    Lambert and P

    N. Lambert and P. C. West, Duality Groups, Automorphic Forms and Higher Derivative Corrections, Phys. Rev. D 75 (2007) 066002, [ hep-th/0611318]

    2007 arXiv

  86. [94]

    L. Bao, M. Cederwall, and B. E. W. Nilsson, Aspects of higher curvature terms and U-duality , Class. Quant. Grav. 25 (2008) 095001, [ arXiv:0706.1183]

    2008 arXiv

  87. [95]

    Colonnello and A

    C. Colonnello and A. Kleinschmidt, Ehlers symmetry at the next derivative order , JHEP 08 (2007) 078, [ arXiv:0706.2816]

    2007 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Klimˇ c ´ ık,Integrability of the bi-Yang-Baxter sigma-model , Lett

    C. Klimˇ c ´ ık,Integrability of the bi-Yang-Baxter sigma-model , Lett. Math. Phys. 104 (2014) 1095–1106, [ arXiv:1402.2105]

    2014 arXiv

  89. [97]

    Hoare, Towards a two-parameter q-deformation of AdS 3×S3×M4 superstrings, Nucl

    B. Hoare, Towards a two-parameter q-deformation of AdS 3×S3×M4 superstrings, Nucl. Phys. B891 (2015) 259–295, [ arXiv:1411.1266]. 40

    2015 arXiv

  90. [98]

    Delduc, S

    F. Delduc, S. Lacroix, M. Magro, and B. Vicedo, On the Hamiltonian integrability of the bi-Yang-Baxter sigma-model , JHEP 03 (2016) 104, [ arXiv:1512.02462]

    2016 arXiv

  91. [99]

    Delduc, B

    F. Delduc, B. Hoare, T. Kameyama, and M. Magro, Combining the bi-Yang-Baxter deformation, the Wess-Zumino term and TsT transformations in one integrable σ-model, JHEP 10 (2017) 212, [ arXiv:1707.08371]

    2017 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Delduc, B

    F. Delduc, B. Hoare, T. Kameyama, S. Lacroix, and M. Magro, Three-parameter integrable deformation of Z4 permutation supercosets, JHEP 01 (2019) 109, [arXiv:1811.00453]

    2019 arXiv

  93. [101]

    Klimˇ cik,Dressing cosets and multi-parametric integrable deformations , JHEP 07 (2019) 176, [ arXiv:1903.00439]

    C. Klimˇ cik,Dressing cosets and multi-parametric integrable deformations , JHEP 07 (2019) 176, [ arXiv:1903.00439]

    2019 arXiv

  94. [102]

    F. K. Seibold, Two-parameter integrable deformations of the AdS3 × S3 × T 4 superstring, JHEP 10 (2019) 049, [ arXiv:1907.05430]

    2019 arXiv

  95. [103]

    Hoare and S

    B. Hoare and S. Lacroix, Yang–Baxter deformations of the principal chiral model plus Wess–Zumino term , J. Phys. A 53 (2020), no. 50 505401, [arXiv:2009.00341]. 41

    2020 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.