Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 100 references

Elasto-Hall conductivity and the anomalous Hall effect in altermagnets

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Pure altermagnets, whose symmetry forbids both magnetization and anomalous Hall effect, acquire a strain-induced anomalous Hall current that is linear in the electric field and governed by the elasto-Hall conductivity.

desk verdict Clean symmetry-based prediction of strain-induced AHE in pure altermagnets; the magnitude estimate is the only real soft spot. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.03517 v2 pith:6Q6LWARQ submitted 2025-02-05 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-el

Keigo Takahashi , Charles R. W. Steward , Masao Ogata , Rafael M. Fernandes , Jörg Schmalian This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el
keywords altermagnetismanomalousHalleffectelasto-HallconductivityBerrycurvaturequadrupolepiezomagnetismstrainengineeringspin-orbitcouplingNernst
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that pure altermagnets — magnetic materials with fully compensated spin order that averages to zero magnetization and whose symmetry forbids an anomalous Hall effect — acquire a Hall current when strained, even though the unstrained state has none. The effect is carried by the elasto-Hall conductivity tensor $\nu^{(a)}_{\alpha\beta\gamma\delta}$, which makes the anomalous Hall current linear in both the applied electric field and the strain. If true, this gives experimenters a practical, linear-in-field transport probe of altermagnetic order, which has been hard to detect because it produces no net magnetization. The paper shows microscopically that strain distorts the Berry curvature quadrupole of the altermagnet into a net Berry curvature monopole, distinguishes this from the separate piezomagnetic response that also produces a magnetization under strain, and tabulates the symmetry-allowed tensor elements for the main crystal classes.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the elasto-Hall conductivity tensor $\nu^{(a)}_{\alpha\beta\gamma\delta}$, defined through $j_\alpha = \nu^{(a)}_{\alpha\beta\gamma\delta} E_\beta \epsilon_{\gamma\delta}$, antisymmetric in its first index pair and symmetric in its last two. Its microscopic content is the strain derivative of the Berry curvature: first-order perturbation theory yields $\Gamma^{(l)}_{\alpha\beta\gamma\delta}(\mathbf{k})$ from the electron-strain matrix elements $\gamma^{\gamma\delta}_{ll'}(\mathbf{k})$, so that $\delta\Omega^{(l)}_{\alpha\beta}=\Gamma^{(l)}_{\alpha\beta\gamma\delta}\epsilon_{\gamma\delta}$. In a $d$-wave altermagnet the Berry curvature is a quadrupole, $\Omega^{(l)}_{xy}(k_x,k_y)=-\Omega^{(l)}_{xy}(-k_y,k_x)$, so its Brillouin-zone average vanishes; strain breaks the fourfold relation and creates the net monopole that drives the Hall effect. A second, symmetry-linked object is the piezomagnetic tensor $\Lambda_{\mu\gamma\delta}$; Jahn-symbol analysis — a notation encoding the time-reversal and inversion parities of tensors — shows $\nu^{(a)}$ and $\varepsilon_{\alpha\beta\mu}\Lambda_{\mu\gamma\delta}$ have the same irreducible representations in every point group.

What would settle it

Measure the strain-dependent Hall conductivity of a candidate pure altermagnet, for example a tetragonal layered $d$-wave altermagnet with $\nu^{(a)}_{xyxx}\sim e^2/h$, under controlled $\epsilon_{xx}-\epsilon_{yy}\sim 10^{-3}$; if the Hall current is absent or orders of magnitude smaller, or if its sign and Fermi-energy dependence do not follow the gapped-Dirac-point pattern, the central mechanism is wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that straining a pure altermagnet induces an anomalous Hall conductivity $\sigma^{(a)}_{xy} = \nu^{(a)}_{xy\gamma\delta}\epsilon_{\gamma\delta}$ that is first order in strain, even though the unstrained system has $\sigma^{(a)}=0$ and $M=0$ by symmetry. Microscopically, the strain couples to the Berry curvature quadrupole and turns it into a net momentum-space monopole; quantitatively, in a Lieb-lattice model with a $d_{x^2-y^2}$ altermagnetic order parameter, the elasto-Hall conductivity reaches the order of $e^2/h$ when the Fermi energy sits near gapped Dirac points, so strains of order $10^{-3}$ give a detectable Hall conductance. The paper also establishes that the strain-induced magnetization appears through a distinct response function, piezomagnetism ($M_\mu=\Lambda_{\mu\gamma\delta}\epsilon_{\gamma\delta}$), whose Berry curvature has a qualitatively different momentum structure, so the emergent AHE is not a by-product of the magnetization. On symmetry grounds, the elasto-Hall and piezomagnetic tensors are locked: in every point group they share the same irreducible-representation content, so allowed elements of one imply allowed elements of the other. A comprehensive table lists the non-zero elasto-Hall conductivity elements for pure altermagnetic order parameters in the common crystal classes; cubic $A^-_{1g}$ order is the only case found with no allowed elements.

Load-bearing premise

The quantitative prediction of a large, detectable elasto-Hall conductivity assumes that the strain couplings in real altermagnets are comparable to the hopping energies and that extrinsic disorder does not overwhelm the intrinsic Berry-curvature response.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Strain is a viable fingerprint for pure altermagnetic order: the induced anomalous Hall current is linear in the electric field, unlike the third-order nonlinear Hall effects previously proposed for the Berry curvature quadrupole.
  • Because the elasto-Hall and piezomagnetic tensors share the same symmetry-allowed elements in every point group, a measurement of either one constrains the other, even though the microscopic mechanisms are separate.
  • The effect is largest near spin-orbit-gapped Dirac points, with $\nu^{(a)}$ of order $e^2/h$, so even strains of order $10^{-3}$ should give a detectable signal in suitable materials.
  • The same mechanism extends to anomalous elasto-thermal Hall, Nernst, and Ettingshausen effects, which can be probed in insulators where the electrical Hall measurement is unavailable.
  • The symmetry table identifies which crystal classes and altermagnetic order-parameter symmetries give non-zero elasto-Hall elements, providing a route to determine the symmetry of the hidden order from transport.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the mechanism is correct, strain becomes a reversible switch: applying and releasing strain turns the Hall response on and off, and the sign of the Hall voltage under a given strain could identify which altermagnetic domain is present.
  • For multi-component altermagnetic order parameters, the allowed tensor elements depend on the relative components $(1,b)$ or $(1,b,c)$, so strain transport could measure the orientation of the order parameter in order-parameter space, not just its presence.
  • The same symmetry toolbox should apply to higher multipolar magnetic orders, such as $g$-wave or octupolar order, whose Berry curvature forms higher multipoles; strain would then probe those hidden orders with the same linear-in-field protocol.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript demonstrates that pure altermagnets, which have vanishing zero-field magnetization and vanishing anomalous Hall conductivity, acquire a non-zero anomalous Hall effect under applied strain, described by the elasto-Hall conductivity tensor introduced in Eq. (2). The authors derive a general first-order-in-strain expression for the intrinsic elasto-Hall conductivity from Berry-curvature perturbation theory (Eqs. (21)-(23)), compute it explicitly in a Lieb-lattice model of a d_{x^2-y^2} altermagnet (Section III B), and show that the strain-induced magnetization arises from a separate response function, piezomagnetism, whose microscopic origin is distinct (Section IV). They furthermore provide symmetry-based selection rules for the elasto-Hall conductivity for orthorhombic, trigonal, tetragonal, hexagonal, and cubic point groups (Table I) and extend the formalism to thermal, Nernst, and Ettingshausen analogs (Section III C). The central claim is that, with strain, the Berry curvature quadrupole of an altermagnet is distorted into a net Berry curvature monopole, giving a field-linear transport signature of the altermagnetic order.

Significance. The conceptual result is significant and, in my assessment, correct: it identifies a linear-in-electric-field transport fingerprint of the Berry curvature quadrupole, which is the defining electronic property of pure altermagnets. The derivation is first-principles in the sense that no parameters are fitted to the target response; the model Hamiltonian, the strain coupling, and the order parameter are all stated explicitly. The group-theoretic analysis in Section V is a useful and comprehensive resource, and the distinction between elasto-Hall conductivity and piezomagnetism is clearly established both by symmetry and by the explicit model calculation. The main weakness is quantitative: the claim that the effect is of order e^2/h and therefore experimentally accessible rests on assumptions about the strain-coupling constants and on the neglect of extrinsic contributions. The symmetry-based existence of the effect is not in question, but the experimental-relevance claim needs further support or careful qualification.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section III B, Eqs. (27)-(28), Figs. 6-7] The quantitative claim that the elasto-Hall conductivity is of order e^2/h, and hence that strain of order 10^-3 yields a detectable AHE, rests on two unverified assumptions: (i) that the strain-coupling constants eta_+, eta_-, eta_0 in Eq. (27) are comparable to the hopping amplitudes, supported only by the Harrison scaling argument in Eq. (28); and (ii) that the intrinsic Berry-curvature contribution dominates over extrinsic disorder contributions, which are not estimated anywhere in the paper. In addition, the numerical values in Figs. 6-9 are extracted by computing the Hall conductivity at epsilon_B1g = 0.05 and dividing by the strain; 5% strain is far outside the perturbative regime for most materials, so the linear coefficient may not be reliably extracted without a convergence check or a direct comparison with the first-order perturbation formula. The symmetry-based existence of the effect is not in question, but the abstract and Section VI should either provide a material-specific first-principles estimate or explicitly state that the magnitude is model-dependent and could be substantially smaller in real materials.
  2. [Section III A, Eqs. (23)-(24)] The paper does not specify whether the chemical potential is held fixed or adjusted to conserve particle number when strain is applied. The strain-induced energy-shift contribution, which appears as the delta-function term in Eq. (23) and is shown to be significant in Fig. 9, shifts the band energies relative to a fixed chemical potential; at fixed carrier density the chemical potential itself shifts with strain, producing an additional contribution to the elasto-Hall conductivity that is not included. Since the paper's quantitative estimate is one of its main selling points, this issue should be addressed explicitly, for example by stating the thermodynamic ensemble assumed and estimating the size of the density-fixing correction.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Fig. 5 caption] The phrase 'superimposed by the Berry curvature rotated by pi/2' is unclear; it should read 'plus the Berry curvature rotated by pi/2' or 'with the rotated Berry curvature added'.
  2. [Eq. (28)] The Harrison scaling argument in Eq. (28) is stated for hopping integrals between orbitals of angular momentum l and l'; please clarify that this is a two-center Slater-Koster scaling and comment on its applicability to the strain derivative of the next-nearest-neighbor hopping in the Lieb-lattice model.
  3. [Section IV, Eq. (34)] The superscript on the strain-modified eigenstates in Eq. (34) is typeset in a way that can be confused with the strain tensor epsilon; using a different symbol, such as a superscript '(eps)' explicitly, would improve readability.
  4. [Table I caption] The caption states that additional elements follow from Eqs. (25) and (26); it would be helpful to state explicitly that the listed elements are the independent ones modulo those symmetry relations, and to note that for the cubic A1g row there are no nonzero elements.
  5. [Section V A] The statement that monoclinic and triclinic point groups do not support pure altermagnetic order in the presence of SOC is asserted without a reference or a short justification; a citation or a one-sentence argument would be useful.
  6. [Note added and Section VI] The comparison with the first-principles study of strained Nb2SeTeO (Ref. [94]) is only qualitative; a brief quantitative comparison of the elasto-Hall conductivity magnitude would strengthen the experimental relevance of the model calculation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: elasto-Hall response is a computed first-order perturbation result with independent group-theoretic support.

full rationale

The paper's central object, the elasto-Hall conductivity nu^(a), is defined as the strain derivative of the antisymmetric conductivity (Eq. 1) and is computed from a first-order perturbation expression (Eq. 23) in terms of zero-strain wavefunctions and electron-strain matrix elements. No parameter is fitted to the target response; the nonzero value of nu^(a) is a calculated output, and the symmetry table (Table I) is derived independently via Jahn symbols, ISOTROPY, and the Bilbao Crystallographic Server. The Lieb-lattice Hamiltonian is taken explicitly as a model input from Ref. [47] (with author overlap), but it is not used as evidence for the target result; the qualitative existence of the effect is established by the group-theoretic analysis in Section V. Citations to Refs. [33] and [89] provide the form of the piezomagnetic coupling, but this is a symmetry-allowed term and is cross-checked by the independent tensor analysis. The only soft point is the magnitude estimate (Section III B), where eta_± are assumed of order of hopping elements; this is a material-parameter assumption, not a construction that builds in the predicted response. No equation reduces to a definition of the claim, and no prediction is a renamed fit.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation is a first-principles perturbative calculation plus group-theoretic tensor analysis. The only adjustable inputs are the parameters of the minimal Lieb lattice model, chosen for illustration and not fitted to any target response. No new entities are introduced, so the circularity burden is minimal.

free parameters (4)
  • strain coupling constants eta_+, eta_-, eta_0 = eta_+=t2, eta_-=td, eta_0=0 in numerical calculations
    These set the scale of the elasto-Hall conductivity; the paper assumes they are of the same order as the hopping amplitudes. No experimental or ab-initio determination is given.
  • hopping parameters t1, t2, td and SOC lambda = t2=0.5 t1, td=2 t1, lambda/t1=0.1 to 2 in figures
    Chosen to illustrate the Lieb lattice model; the quantitative magnitude of the effect depends on these values.
  • altermagnetic order parameter Nz = Nz/Nc = 0.25 to 2 in figures
    The elasto-Hall conductivity varies strongly with Nz, especially across the Dirac point transition at Nz=Nc.
  • Zeeman coupling Jm associated with induced magnetization = Jm Mz/t1 = 0.5 in Fig. 10
    Used to model the magnetization-induced AHE contribution; value is illustrative only.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math The Hall conductivity is given by the Berry curvature integral (Eq. 4).
    Standard Kubo/Berry curvature formula; cited to Refs. [56-60].
  • standard math First-order perturbation theory in strain gives the strain correction to wavefunctions and energies (Eq. 20).
    Standard quantum mechanical perturbation theory, applied to the strain Hamiltonian.
  • domain assumption The altermagnetic order parameter transforms as a time-reversal-odd irrep of the point group, and pure altermagnets are those where this irrep is not the magnetization irrep.
    This is the defining framework of the paper, taken from the altermagnetism literature (e.g., Refs. [1-3,33]).
  • domain assumption The low-energy Lieb lattice model captures the essential symmetry and band topology of generic d-wave altermagnets.
    The model is from Ref. [47] and is used to compute quantitative responses; the symmetry analysis in Section V is model-independent, but the numerical magnitude is model-specific.
  • standard math Jahn symbol decomposition: the antisymmetric part of a rank-2 tensor transforms as an axial vector (a{ V^2 }), so the elasto-Hall conductivity and piezomagnetic tensor share irreps.
    A mathematical identity from tensor analysis of point groups, used to derive Table I.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Elasto-Hall conductivity and the anomalous Hall effect in altermagnets." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6Q6LWARQ

@misc{pith2026250203517,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Elasto-Hall conductivity and the anomalous Hall effect in altermagnets},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6Q6LWARQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.03517}
}
abstract

Altermagnets break time-reversal symmetry, preserve the crystal translation invariance, and have a spin density with $d$-wave, $g$-wave, etc. momentum dependencies which do not contribute to the magnetization. When an $s$-wave spin-density contribution cannot be excluded by symmetry a small magnetization and an anomalous Hall effect (AHE) emerge. However, for so-called "pure" altermagnets, where the $s$-wave component is symmetry forbidden even in the presence of SOC, both the zero-field magnetization and the AHE vanish. We show that altermagnets generally exhibit a non-zero elasto-Hall-conductivity, by which application of strain leads to a non-zero AHE. For pure altermagnets it is the only contribution to the AHE. This elasto-Hall-conductivity is caused by strain coupling to the Berry curvature quadrupole that characterizes altermagnets and allows for the determination of the altermagnetic order using transport measurements that are linear in the electrical field. We further show that the emergence of a non-zero magnetization in the presence of strain arises from a different response function: piezomagnetism. While this magnetization gives rise to an additional contribution to the elasto-Hall conductivity, the corresponding Berry curvature is qualitatively different from the distorted Berry curvature quadrupole originating from the altermagnetic order parameter. This insight also helps to disentangle AHE and weak ferromagnetism for systems with symmetry-allowed $s$-wave contribution. Quantitatively, the elasto-Hall conductivity is particularly pronounced for systems with a Dirac spectrum in the altermagnetic state. The same mechanism gives rise to anomalous elasto-thermal Hall, Nernst, and Ettinghausen effects.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.03517 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The anomalous Hall conductivity in strained altermagnets has two contributions: One from the change in the Berry curvature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. The Berry curvature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Illustration of the Lieb lattice employed in the low-energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. The Berry curvature calculated from the band structures of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Elasto-Hall conductivity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Elasto-Hall conductivity for different values of the al [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. The net magnetization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Berry curvature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. The Berry curvature of the lower bands of (a) spin-up section [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. The elasto-Hall conductivity calculated from Eq. ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_12.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

100 extracted references · 48 canonical work pages

  1. [15]

    M. Hu, X. Cheng, Z. Huang, and J. Liu, Catalogue of 𝑐-paired spin-valley locking in antiferromagnetic systems, arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.02319 (2024)

    arXiv 2024

  2. [94]

    Schiff, P

    H. Schiff, P. McClarty, J. G. Rau, and J. Romhanyi, Collinear Altermagnets and their Landau Theories, arXiv:2412.18025 (2024)

    arXiv 2024

  3. [1]

    2(a) [47]

    Low-energy model The low-energy model employed here consists of electrons on a Lieb lattice coupled to an altermagnetic order parame- ter, as illustrated in Fig. 2(a) [47]. As such, electrons have both a sublattice and a spin degree of freedom. Because the two sublattices are related by a 90◦ rotation, an intra-unit-cell antiparallel alignment of the spin...

  4. [2]

    As expected, when the Fermi energy is located in the gap, each Dirac point gives a Chern number contribution±1/2 which cancel each other, leading to 𝜎(𝑎) 𝑥𝑦 (𝜔)= 0

    Elasto-conductivity In order to determine the elasto-Hall conductivity, we add the contributions of the AHE from each band and for finite strain. As expected, when the Fermi energy is located in the gap, each Dirac point gives a Chern number contribution±1/2 which cancel each other, leading to 𝜎(𝑎) 𝑥𝑦 (𝜔)= 0. Hence, we consider the case where the Fermi en...

  5. [3]

    Non-vanishing elements of the elasto-Hall conductivity tensor𝜈(𝑎) 𝛼𝛽𝛾𝛿 defined in Eq

    4′/𝑚𝑚′𝑚 (15.4.56) 𝜈𝑦𝑧𝑦𝑧 =𝜈𝑧𝑥𝑥𝑧 ,𝜈𝑥𝑦𝑥𝑦 (1,𝑏)𝑚𝑚𝑚 (8.1.24) 𝜈𝑦𝑧𝑦𝑧 ,𝜈𝑧𝑥𝑥𝑧 ,𝜈𝑥𝑦𝑥𝑦 𝑇− 2𝑔 (1,0,0) 4′/𝑚𝑚′𝑚 (15.4.56) 𝜈𝑦𝑧𝑥𝑧 =−𝜈𝑧𝑥𝑦𝑧 ,𝜈𝑥𝑦𝑥𝑥 =−𝜈𝑥𝑦𝑦𝑦 (1,1,0)𝑚′𝑚′𝑚 (8.4.27) 𝜈𝑦𝑧𝑥𝑥 ,𝜈𝑦𝑧𝑦𝑦 ,𝜈𝑦𝑧𝑧𝑧 ,𝜈𝑥𝑦𝑥𝑧 ,𝜈𝑥𝑧𝑥𝑦 (1,1,1) ¯3𝑚 (20.1.71) 𝜈𝑥𝑧𝑥𝑦 =𝜈𝑧𝑦𝑦𝑦 =𝜈𝑦𝑧𝑥𝑥 ,𝜈𝑥𝑧𝑥𝑧 =𝜈𝑦𝑧𝑦𝑧 (1,𝑏, 0) 2′/𝑚′ (5.5.16) 𝜈𝑥𝑦𝑥𝑥 ,𝜈𝑦𝑧𝑥𝑥 ,𝜈𝑥𝑦𝑦𝑦 ,𝜈𝑦𝑧𝑦𝑦 𝜈𝑥𝑦𝑧𝑧 ,𝜈𝑦𝑧𝑧𝑧 ,𝜈𝑥𝑧𝑦𝑧 ,𝜈𝑥𝑦𝑥𝑧 ,𝜈𝑦𝑧𝑥𝑧 ,𝜈𝑥𝑧𝑥𝑦 (1,1,𝑐) 2/𝑚 (5.1...

  6. [4]

    𝑘∗,𝜎 (𝜎=↑,↓) is given by 𝑘∗,𝜎 = 2arccos √︄ 𝐽𝑁𝑧+𝜎𝜀𝐵1𝑔(4𝜂−− 2𝜂0) 4(𝑡𝑑+𝜎𝜀𝐵1𝑔𝜂−) ! , (A1) where𝜎= 1(𝜎=−1) for spin-up (down) bands

    Dirac points and an effective model The Dirac points along the 𝑋−𝑀 line, where the spin- down bands cross for 𝐽𝑁𝑧 > 0 at zero SOC, are located at (𝜋,𝜁𝑘 ∗,↓) (𝜁 =±), while the Dirac points along the 𝑌−𝑀 line, where spin-up bands cross, are located at(𝜁𝑘∗,↑,𝜋). 𝑘∗,𝜎 (𝜎=↑,↓) is given by 𝑘∗,𝜎 = 2arccos √︄ 𝐽𝑁𝑧+𝜎𝜀𝐵1𝑔(4𝜂−− 2𝜂0) 4(𝑡𝑑+𝜎𝜀𝐵1𝑔𝜂−) ! , (A1) where𝜎= 1(𝜎...

  7. [5]

    Voleti, D

    S. Voleti, D. D. Maharaj, B. D. Gaulin, G. Luke, and A. Paramekanti, Multipolar magnetism in d-orbital systems: Crystal field levels, octupolar order, and orbital loop currents, Phys. Rev. B101, 155118 (2020)

    2020

  8. [6]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond Conventional Ferromagnetism and Antiferromagnetism: A Phase with Non- relativistic Spin and Crystal Rotation Symmetry, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031042 (2022)

    2022

Show all 100 references
  1. [7]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging Research Landscape of Altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X12, 040501 (2022)

    2022

  2. [8]

    ˇSmejkal, R

    L. ˇSmejkal, R. Gonz ´alez-Hern´andez, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spon- taneous Hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets, Science ad- vances 6, eaaz8809 (2020)

    2020

  3. [9]

    Jungwirth, R

    T. Jungwirth, R. M. Fernandes, J. Sinova, and L. ˇSmejkal, Al- termagnets and beyond: Nodal magnetically-ordered phases, arXiv:2409.10034 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  4. [10]

    Winkler and U

    R. Winkler and U. Z¨ ulicke, Theory of electric, magnetic, and toroidal polarizations in crystalline solids with applications to hexagonal lonsdaleite and cubic diamond, Phys. Rev. B 107, 16 155201 (2023)

    2023

  5. [11]

    Hayami, Y

    S. Hayami, Y. Yanagi, and H. Kusunose, Momentum-Dependent Spin Splitting by Collinear Antiferromagnetic Ordering, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 88, 123702 (2019)

    2019

  6. [12]

    Fiore Mosca, L

    D. Fiore Mosca, L. V. Pourovskii, and C. Franchini, Modeling magnetic multipolar phases in density functional theory, Phys. Rev. B106, 035127 (2022)

    2022

  7. [13]

    Bhowal and N

    S. Bhowal and N. A. Spaldin, Magnetic octupoles as the or- der parameter for unconventional antiferromagnetism, arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.03756 10.48550/arXiv.2212.03756 (2022)

    2022 doi arXiv

  8. [14]

    Urru and N

    A. Urru and N. A. Spaldin, Magnetic octupole tensor decom- position and second-order magnetoelectric effect, Annals of Physics 447, 168964 (2022)

    2022

  9. [16]

    I. I. Pomeranchuk, On the stability of a Fermi liquid, Sov. Phys. JETP 8, 361 (1958)

    1958

  10. [17]

    C. Wu, K. Sun, E. Fradkin, and S.-C. Zhang, Fermi liquid insta- bilities in the spin channel, Phys. Rev. B75, 115103 (2007)

    2007

  11. [18]

    Jungwirth, R

    T. Jungwirth, R. Fernandes, E. Fradkin, A. MacDonald, J. Sinova, and L. Smejkal, From supefluid 3He to altermagnets, arXiv:2411.00717 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  12. [19]

    H.-Y. Ma, M. Hu, N. Li, J. Liu, W. Yao, J.-F. Jia, and J. Liu, Multifunctional antiferromagnetic materials with giant piezo- magnetism and noncollinear spin current, Nature communica- tions 12, 2846 (2021)

    2021

  13. [20]

    ˇSmejkal, A

    L. ˇSmejkal, A. Marmodoro, K.-H. Ahn, R. Gonzalez- Hernandez, I. Turek, S. Mankovsky, H. Ebert, S. W. D’Souza, O. ˇSipr, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Chiral magnons in alter- magnetic RuO2, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 256703 (2023)

    2023

  14. [21]

    M. Naka, S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, Y. Yanagi, Y. Motome, and H. Seo, Spin current generation in organic antiferromagnets, Nat. Commun. 10, 4305 (2019)

    2019

  15. [22]

    M. Naka, S. Hayami, H. Kusunose, Y. Yanagi, Y. Motome, and H. Seo, Anomalous hall effect in 𝜅-type organic antiferromag- nets, Phys. Rev. B102, 075112 (2020)

    2020

  16. [23]

    I. I. Mazin, K. Koepernik, M. D. Johannes, R. Gonz ´alez- Hern´andez, and L. ˇSmejkal, Prediction of unconventional mag- netism in doped FeSb 2, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, e2108924118 (2021)

    2021

  17. [24]

    Turek, Altermagnetism and magnetic groups with pseu- doscalar electron spin, Phys

    I. Turek, Altermagnetism and magnetic groups with pseu- doscalar electron spin, Phys. Rev. B106, 094432 (2022)

    2022

  18. [25]

    Chakraborty and A

    D. Chakraborty and A. M. Black-Schaffer, Zero-field finite- momentum and field-induced superconductivity in altermag- nets, arXiv:2309.14427 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  19. [26]

    R. D. Gonzalez Betancourt, J. Zub ´aˇc, R. Gonzalez-Hernandez, K. Geishendorf, Z. ˇSob´aˇn, G. Springholz, K. Olejn ´ık, L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, S. T. B. Goennenwein, A. Thomas, H. Reichlov´a, J. ˇZelezn´ y, and D. Kriegner, Sponta- neous Anomalous Hall Effect Ar...

    2023

  20. [27]

    Mazin, Altermagnetism in MnTe: Origin, predicted manifes- tations, and routes to detwinning, Phys

    I. Mazin, Altermagnetism in MnTe: Origin, predicted manifes- tations, and routes to detwinning, Phys. Rev. B 107, L100418 (2023)

    2023

  21. [28]

    Fakhredine, R

    A. Fakhredine, R. M. Sattigeri, G. Cuono, and C. Autieri, Inter- play between altermagnetism and nonsymmorphic symmetries generating large anomalous Hall conductivity by semi-Dirac points induced anticrossings, Phys. Rev. B108, 115138 (2023)

    2023

  22. [29]

    Mazin, R

    I. Mazin, R. Gonz ´alez-Hern´andez, and L. ˇSmejkal, In- duced Monolayer Altermagnetism in MnP(S,Se) 3 and FeSe, arXiv:2309.02355 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  23. [30]

    J. Ding, Z. Jiang, X. Chen, Z. Tao, Z. Liu, T. Li, J. Liu, J. Sun, J. Cheng, J. Liu, Y. Yang, R. Zhang, L. Deng, W. Jing, Y. Huang, Y. Shi, M. Ye, S. Qiao, Y. Wang, Y. Guo, D. Feng, and D. Shen, Large band splitting in𝑔-wave altermagnet crsb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 206401 (2024)

    2024

  24. [31]

    Z. Feng, X. Zhou, L. ˇSmejkal, L. Wu, Z. Zhu, H. Guo, R. Gonz ´alez-Hern´andez, X. Wang, H. Yan, P. Qin, et al., An anomalous Hall effect in altermagnetic ruthenium dioxide, Na- ture Electronics 5, 735 (2022)

    2022

  25. [32]

    H. Bai, Y. C. Zhang, Y. J. Zhou, P. Chen, C. H. Wan, L. Han, W. X. Zhu, S. X. Liang, Y. C. Su, X. F. Han, F. Pan, and C. Song, Efficient Spin-to-Charge Conversion via Altermagnetic Spin Splitting Effect in Antiferromagnet RuO2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 216701 (2023)

    2023

  26. [33]

    C. R. W. Steward, R. M. Fernandes, and J. Schmalian, Dynamic paramagnon-polarons in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B108, 144418 (2023)

    2023

  27. [34]

    Y. Guo, H. Liu, O. Janson, I. C. Fulga, J. van den Brink, and J. I. Facio, Spin-split collinear antiferromagnets: A large-scale ab-initio study, Mater. Today Phys.32, 100991 (2023)

    2023

  28. [35]

    X. Chen, J. Ren, Y. Zhu, Y. Yu, A. Zhang, P. Liu, J. Li, Y. Liu, C. Li, and Q. Liu, Enumeration and representation theory of spin space groups, Phys. Rev. X14, 031038 (2024)

    2024

  29. [36]

    G. Yang, Z. Li, S. Yang, J. Li, H. Zheng, W. Zhu, Z. Pan, Y. Xu, S. Cao, W. Zhao, A. Jana, J. Zhang, M. Ye, Y. Song, L.-H. Hu, L. Yang, J. Fujii, I. Vobornik, M. Shi, H. Yuan, Y. Zhang, Y. Xu, and Y. Liu, Three-dimensional mapping and electronic origin of large altermagnetic s...

    2024 arXiv

  30. [37]

    C. Li, M. Hu, Z. Li, Y. Wang, W. Chen, B. Thiagarajan, M. Le- andersson, C. Polley, T. Kim, H. Liu, C. Fulga, M. G. Vergniory, O. Janson, O. Tjernberg, and J. van den Brink, Topological Weyl Altermagnetism in CrSb, arXiv:2405.14777 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  31. [38]

    R. M. Fernandes, V. S. de Carvalho, T. Birol, and R. G. Pereira, Topological transition from nodal to nodeless Zeeman splitting in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B109, 024404 (2024)

    2024

  32. [39]

    P. A. McClarty and J. G. Rau, Landau Theory of Altermag- netism, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 176702 (2024)

    2024

  33. [40]

    H. G. Giil and J. Linder, Superconductor-altermagnet memory functionality without stray fields, Phys. Rev. B 109, 134511 (2024)

    2024

  34. [41]

    Jiang, Z

    Y. Jiang, Z. Song, T. Zhu, Z. Fang, H. Weng, Z.-X. Liu, J. Yang, and C. Fang, Enumeration of spin-space groups: Toward a com- plete description of symmetries of magnetic orders, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031039 (2024)

    2024

  35. [42]

    Z. Xiao, J. Zhao, Y. Li, R. Shindou, and Z.-D. Song, Spin space groups: Full classification and applications, Phys. Rev. X 14, 031037 (2024)

    2024

  36. [43]

    S. A. A. Ghorashi, T. L. Hughes, and J. Cano, Altermagnetic Routes to Majorana Modes in Zero Net Magnetization, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 106601 (2024)

    2024

  37. [44]

    Sødequist and T

    J. Sødequist and T. Olsen, Two-dimensional altermagnets from high throughput computational screening: Symmetry require- ments, chiral magnons, and spin-orbit effects, Applied Physics Letters 124 (2024)

    2024

  38. [45]

    O. Amin, A. Dal Din, E. Golias, Y. Niu, A. Zakharov, S. Fro- mage, C. Fields, S. Heywood, R. Cousins, F. Maccherozzi,et al., Nanoscale imaging and control of altermagnetism in mnte, Na- ture 636, 348 (2024)

    2024

  39. [46]

    E. W. Hodt and J. Linder, Spin pumping in an altermagnet/normal-metal bilayer, Phys. Rev. B 109, 174438 (2024)

    2024

  40. [47]

    Jaeschke-Ubiergo, V

    R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, V. K. Bharadwaj, T. Jungwirth, L. ˇSmejkal, and J. Sinova, Supercell altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B 109, 094425 (2024)

    2024

  41. [48]

    X. Wan, S. Mandal, Y. Guo, and K. Haule, High-throughput Search for Metallic Altermagnets by Embedded Dynamical Mean Field Theory, arXiv:2412.10356 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  42. [49]

    Krempask` y, L

    J. Krempask` y, L. ˇSmejkal, S. D’Souza, M. Hajlaoui, G. Springholz, K. Uhl´ıˇrov´a, F. Alarab, P. Constantinou, V. Stro- cov, D. Usanov, et al., Altermagnetic lifting of Kramers spin degeneracy, Nature 626, 517 (2024)

    2024

  43. [50]

    Attias, A

    L. Attias, A. Levchenko, and M. Khodas, Intrinsic anomalous Hall effect in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B110, 094425 (2024)

    2024

  44. [51]

    Brekke, A

    B. Brekke, A. Brataas, and A. Sudbø, Two-dimensional alter- magnets: Superconductivity in a minimal microscopic model, Phys. Rev. B108, 224421 (2023). 17

    2023

  45. [52]

    D. S. Antonenko, R. M. Fernandes, and J. W. Venderbos, Mirror chern bands and weyl nodal loops in altermagnets, arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.10201 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  46. [53]

    M. Roig, A. Kreisel, Y. Yu, B. M. Andersen, and D. F. Agterberg, Minimal models for altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. B110, 144412 (2024)

    2024

  47. [54]

    Parshukov, R

    K. Parshukov, R. Wiedmann, and A. P. Schnyder, Topologi- cal responses from gapped Weyl points in 2D altermagnets, arXiv:2403.09520 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  48. [55]

    X. Zhou, W. Feng, R.-W. Zhang, L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, Y. Mokrousov, and Y. Yao, Crystal Thermal Transport in Al- termagnetic RuO2, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 056701 (2024)

    2024

  49. [56]

    P. Rao, A. Mook, and J. Knolle, Tunable band topology and optical conductivity in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B 110, 024425 (2024)

    2024

  50. [57]

    H. Chen, Q. Niu, and A. H. MacDonald, Anomalous Hall Effect Arising from Noncollinear Antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 017205 (2014)

    2014

  51. [58]

    M. Naka, Y. Motome, and H. Seo, Anomalous Hall effect in antiferromagnetic perovskites, Phys. Rev. B106, 195149 (2022)

    2022

  52. [59]

    ˇSmejkal, A

    L. ˇSmejkal, A. H. MacDonald, J. Sinova, S. Nakatsuji, and T. Jungwirth, Anomalous Hall antiferromagnets, Nature Re- views Materials 7, 482 (2022)

    2022

  53. [60]

    Nagaosa, J

    N. Nagaosa, J. Sinova, S. Onoda, A. H. MacDonald, and N. P. Ong, Anomalous Hall effect, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1539 (2010)

    2010

  54. [61]

    Karplus and J

    R. Karplus and J. M. Luttinger, Hall Effect in Ferromagnetics, Phys. Rev.95, 1154 (1954)

    1954

  55. [62]

    Chang and Q

    M.-C. Chang and Q. Niu, Berry phase, hyperorbits, and the Hof- stadter spectrum: Semiclassical dynamics in magnetic Bloch bands, Phys. Rev. B53, 7010 (1996)

    1996

  56. [63]

    Sundaram and Q

    G. Sundaram and Q. Niu, Wave-packet dynamics in slowly per- turbed crystals: Gradient corrections and Berry-phase effects, Phys. Rev. B59, 14915 (1999)

    1999

  57. [64]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Berry Curvature on the Fermi Surface: Anomalous Hall Effect as a Topological Fermi-Liquid Property, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 206602 (2004)

    2004

  58. [65]

    Xiang, C

    L. Xiang, C. Zhang, L. Wang, and J. Wang, Third-order intrinsic anomalous Hall effect with generalized semiclassical theory, Phys. Rev. B107, 075411 (2023)

    2023

  59. [66]

    Y. Fang, J. Cano, and S. A. A. Ghorashi, Quantum Geometry Induced Nonlinear Transport in Altermagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 106701 (2024)

    2024

  60. [67]

    Sorn and A

    S. Sorn and A. S. Patri, Signatures of hidden octupolar order from nonlinear Hall effects, Phys. Rev. B110, 125127 (2024)

    2024

  61. [68]

    Farajollahpour, R

    T. Farajollahpour, R. Ganesh, and K. Samokhin, Light-induced Hall currents in altermagnets, arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.03779 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  62. [69]

    Sodemann and L

    I. Sodemann and L. Fu, Quantum Nonlinear Hall Effect Induced by Berry Curvature Dipole in Time-Reversal Invariant Materi- als, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 216806 (2015)

    2015

  63. [70]

    Frachet, P

    M. Frachet, P. Wiecki, T. Lacmann, S. Souliou, K. Willa, C. Meingast, M. Merz, A.-A. Haghighirad, M. Le Tacon, and A. B¨ohmer, Elastoresistivity in the incommensurate charge den- sity wave phase of BaNi 2(As1−𝑥P𝑥)2, npj Quantum Materials 7, 115 (2022)

    2022

  64. [71]

    Sankar, R

    S. Sankar, R. Liu, C.-P. Zhang, Q.-F. Li, C. Chen, X.-J. Gao, J. Zheng, Y.-H. Lin, K. Qian, R.-P. Yu, X. Zhang, Z. Y. Meng, K. T. Law, Q. Shao, and B. J ¨ack, Experimental Evidence for a Berry Curvature Quadrupole in an Antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. X 14, 021046 (2024)

    2024

  65. [72]

    Y. Sun, S. E. Thompson, and T. Nishida, Strain Effect in Semi- conductors: Theory and Device Applications, Springer Science & Business Media (2009)

    2009

  66. [73]

    H.-H. Kuo, M. C. Shapiro, S. C. Riggs, and I. R. Fisher, Mea- surement of the elastoresistivity coefficients of the underdoped iron arsenide Ba(Fe0.975Co0.025)2As2, Phys. Rev. B88, 085113 (2013)

    2013

  67. [74]

    L. Nie, K. Sun, W. Ma, D. Song, L. Zheng, Z. Liang, P. Wu, F. Yu, J. Li, M. Shan, et al., Charge-density-wave-driven elec- tronic nematicity in a kagome superconductor, Nature 604, 59 (2022)

    2022

  68. [75]

    K. V. Yershov, V. P. Kravchuk, M. Daghofer, and J. van den Brink, Fluctuation-induced piezomagnetism in local moment altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B110, 144421 (2024)

    2024

  69. [76]

    A. G. Singh, M. D. Bachmann, J. J. Sanchez, A. Pandey, A. Ka- pitulnik, J. W. Kim, P. J. Ryan, S. A. Kivelson, and I. R. Fisher, Emergent tetragonality in a fundamentally orthorhombic mate- rial, Science Advances 10, eadk3321 (2024)

    2024

  70. [77]

    M. C. Shapiro, P. Hlobil, A. T. Hristov, A. V. Maharaj, and I. R. Fisher, Symmetry constraints on the elastoresistivity tensor, Phys. Rev. B92, 235147 (2015)

    2015

  71. [78]

    M. E. Sorensen and I. R. Fisher, Proposal for methods to measure the octupole susceptibility in certain cubic Pr compounds, Phys. Rev. B103, 155106 (2021)

    2021

  72. [79]

    Day-Roberts, R

    E. Day-Roberts, R. M. Fernandes, and T. Birol, Piezoresistivity as a Fingerprint of Ferroaxial Transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 016401 (2025)

    2025

  73. [80]

    Jiang, M

    B. Jiang, M. Hu, J. Bai, Z. Song, C. Mu, G. Qu, W. Li, W. Zhu, H. Pi, Z. Wei, et al., Discovery of a metallic room-temperature d-wave altermagnet KV2Se2O, arXiv:2408.00320 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  74. [81]

    Y. Yao, L. Kleinman, A. H. MacDonald, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, D.-s. Wang, E. Wang, and Q. Niu, First Principles Calculation of Anomalous Hall Conductivity in Ferromagnetic bcc Fe, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 037204 (2004)

    2004

  75. [82]

    Zhang, F

    H. Zhang, F. Freimuth, S. Bl¨ ugel, Y. Mokrousov, and I. Souza, Role of Spin-Flip Transitions in the Anomalous Hall Effect of FePt Alloy, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 117202 (2011)

    2011

  76. [83]

    D¨ urrnagel, H

    M. D¨ urrnagel, H. Hohmann, A. Maity, J. Seufert, M. Klett, L. Klebl, and R. Thomale, Altermagnetic phase transition in a lieb metal, arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.14251 (2024)

    2024

  77. [84]

    C.-C. Wei, X. Li, S. Hatt, X. Huai, J. Liu, B. Singh, K.- M. Kim, R. M. Fernandes, P. Cardon, L. Zhao, et al., La2O3Mn2Se2: a correlated insulating layered d-wave alter- magnet, arXiv:2410.14542 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  78. [85]

    Jahn, Note on the Bhagavantam–Suranarayana method of enumerating the physical constants of crystals, Acta Crystallo- graphica 2, 30 (1949)

    H. Jahn, Note on the Bhagavantam–Suranarayana method of enumerating the physical constants of crystals, Acta Crystallo- graphica 2, 30 (1949)

    1949

  79. [86]

    Zhang, X

    F. Zhang, X. Cheng, Z. Yin, C. Liu, L. Deng, Y. Qiao, Z. Shi, S. Zhang, J. Lin, Z. Liu, et al., Crystal-symmetry-paired spin- valley locking in a layered room-temperature antiferromagnet, arXiv:2407.19555 (2024)

    2024

  80. [87]

    Li, A.-D

    J.-Y. Li, A.-D. Fan, Y.-K. Wang, Y. Zhang, and S. Li, Strain- induced valley polarization, topological states, and piezomag- netism in two-dimensional altermagnetic V 2Te2O, V 2STeO, V2SSeO, and V2S2O, Applied Physics Letters 125 (2024)

    2024

  81. [88]

    W. A. Harrison, Electronic structure and the properties of solids: the physics of the chemical bond, Courier Corporation (2012)

    2012

  82. [89]

    P. W. Bridgman, The Connections between the Four Transverse Galvanomagnetic and Thermomagnetic Phenomena, Phys. Rev. 24, 644 (1924)

    1924

  83. [90]

    A. S. Patri, A. Sakai, S. Lee, A. Paramekanti, S. Nakatsuji, and Y. B. Kim, Unveiling hidden multipolar orders with mag- netostriction, Nature Communications 10, 4092 (2019)

    2019

  84. [91]

    M. I. Aroyo, J. M. Perez-Mato, C. Capillas, E. Kroumova, S. Ivantchev, G. Madariaga, A. Kirov, and H. Wondratschek, Bilbao Crystallographic Server: I. Databases and crystallo- graphic computing programs, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Kristallographie- Crystalline Materials 221, 15 (2006). 18

    2006

  85. [92]

    M. I. Aroyo, A. Kirov, C. Capillas, J. Perez-Mato, and H. Won- dratschek, Bilbao Crystallographic Server. II. Representations of crystallographic point groups and space groups, Acta Crys- tallographica Section A: Foundations of Crystallography 62, 115 (2006)

    2006

  86. [93]

    and the Bilbao Crystallographic Server [86, 87]. We em- phasize that, while altermagnets are formally defined in terms of spin groups, because the phenomena we are interested in (e.g., AHE) are associated with SOC, we must use magnetic point groups. The coupling constant𝜆𝑎 𝜇,𝑖...

  87. [95]

    C. R. W. Steward, G. Palle, M. Garst, J. Schmalian, and I. Jang, Elastic quantum criticality in nematics and altermagnets via the elasto-caloric effect, arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.14033 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Aoyama and K

    T. Aoyama and K. Ohgushi, Piezomagnetic properties in alter- magnetic MnTe, Phys. Rev. Mat.8, L041402 (2024)

    2024

  89. [97]

    Banerjee and M

    S. Banerjee and M. S. Scheurer, Altermagnetic superconducting diode effect, Phys. Rev. B110, 024503 (2024)

    2024

  90. [98]

    H. T. Stokes, D. M. Hatch, and B. J. Campbell, ISOTROPY Software Suite, iso.byu.edu (2022)

    2022

  91. [99]

    Jiang, X

    Y. Jiang, X. Zhang, H. Bai, Y. Tian, W.-J. Gong, and X. Kong, Strain-engineering spin-valley locking effect in alter- magnetic monolayer with multipiezo properties, arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.05597 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  92. [100]

    Ogata, S

    M. Ogata, S. Ozaki, and H. Matsuura, Anomalous Spin Trans- port Properties of Gapped Dirac Electrons with Tilting, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 91, 023708 (2022)

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.