Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 60 references

Intermittent, Reflection-Driven, Strong Imbalanced MHD Turbulence

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A new model fixes solar wind turbulence spectrum at -1.51 slope.

desk verdict A compact, honest phenomenological model that makes a striking new prediction about intermittency in imbalanced MHD turbulence, but the whole edifice rests on an underived anticorrelation closure, so the PSP agreement should be read as suggestive, not confirmatory. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.04585 v1 pith:ZUC3ECCE submitted 2025-02-07 physics.plasm-ph astro-ph.SRphysics.space-ph

B. D. G. Chandran , N. Sioulas , S. Bale , T. Bowen , V. David , R. Meyrand , E. Yerger This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.plasm-phastro-ph.SRphysics.space-ph
keywords MHDturbulenceimbalancedintermittencyAlfvénwavereflectionsolarwindParkerProbeElsasservariablesstructurefunctions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper develops a parameter-free model of strong imbalanced magnetohydrodynamic turbulence in which the minority Alfvén-wave population is continuously regenerated by reflection off spatial variations in the Alfvén speed. It predicts that the inertial-range Elsasser spectra fall as frequency to the $-1.51$ power, that the $n$th-order structure-function exponents are $\zeta_n = 1 - (0.7035)^n$, and that the parallel correlation length of the energy-dominating fluctuations scales as perpendicular scale to the $0.826$ power. These predictions are compared with Parker Solar Probe first-encounter measurements and agree reasonably well over the range 200 to 6000 proton inertial lengths. The central physical consequence is that intermittency in this reflection-driven setting shrinks the parallel length of the strongest small-scale fluctuations, raising their parallel wavenumbers and suggesting more ion cyclotron heating than in balanced-turbulence models. The model contains no adjustable parameters but rests on three explicit conjectures, the most load-bearing being an assumed anti-correlation between the strong and weak Elsasser populations in the rare intense regions.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing device is the log-Poisson intermittency ansatz $\delta z^\pm_\lambda = z^\pm \beta^q$, with $q$ Poisson-distributed with mean $\mu = A + \ln(L_\perp/\lambda)$, together with the anti-correlation conjecture $\delta z^-_\lambda \sim w^-_\lambda w^+_\lambda/\delta z^+_\lambda$ in the intense tail regions. The log-Poisson ansatz yields $\zeta_n = 1 - \beta^n$; the anti-correlation conjecture, inserted into the constant-flux condition $\langle (\delta z^+_\lambda)^2 \delta z^-_\lambda/\lambda\rangle \propto \lambda^0$, converts the flux constraint into $\beta = -2\ln\beta$. Solving that equation fixes $\beta = 2W_0(1/2) = 0.7035$ and thereby sets the spectral slope $-1 - \zeta_2 = -1.51$ and the parallel-length exponent $1 + \beta^2\ln\beta = 0.826$. The agent-of-shearing choice $l^+_\lambda \simeq l^-_\lambda = v_A\lambda/\delta z^+_\lambda$ carries the geometric part of the argument, replacing the sheet-based reasoning of earlier balanced models.

What would settle it

Run a high-resolution direct numerical simulation of reflection-driven imbalanced reduced MHD turbulence and measure the conditional mean of $\delta z^-_\lambda$ at large values of $\delta z^+_\lambda$; the paper's core conjecture predicts a strict $\delta z^-_\lambda \propto 1/\delta z^+_\lambda$ falloff in the tail, so observing a flat or positively correlated conditional amplitude would falsify the fixed-point equation $\beta = -2\ln\beta$ and all derived exponents.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that in strong imbalanced MHD turbulence, where the outward-propagating Elsasser population $z^+$ greatly exceeds the inward population $z^-$ and where $z^-$ is kept alive by reflection of $z^+$ off Alfvén-speed gradients, intermittency can be captured by a log-Poisson amplitude distribution whose volume filling factor shrinks linearly with perpendicular scale $\lambda$. Combining this distribution with critical balance, the anomalous coherence of $z^-$, and the conjecture that inside the rare intense regions $\delta z^-_\lambda \sim w^-_\lambda w^+_\lambda / \delta z^+_\lambda$, the constant-flux condition reduces to $\beta = -2\ln\beta$. The paper solves this equation to $\beta = 2W_0(1/2) = 0.7035$ and then derives the structure-function exponents $\zeta_n = 1 - \beta^n$, the Elsasser spectra $E^\pm(f) \propto f^{-1.51}$, and the parallel-length scaling $l_{(2),\lambda} \propto \lambda^{0.826}$. These predictions are tested against the high-cross-helicity magnetic-field increments from Parker Solar Probe's first encounter, over $200d_i < \lambda < 6000d_i$, and the paper reports reasonable agreement. It further argues that, unlike balanced intermittency models, the dominant small-scale fluctuations here become more isotropic, so their parallel wavenumbers increase and ion cyclotron heating is enhanced.

Load-bearing premise

The whole set of predicted exponents rests on the conjecture that inside the rare small volumes where the dominant outward waves are unusually strong, the weaker inward waves are correspondingly weaker in a strict inverse proportion ($\delta z^-_\lambda \propto 1/\delta z^+_\lambda$); without that assumed anti-correlation the constant-flux condition does not fix $\beta$ and none of the scaling exponents follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The inertial-range $z^+$ power spectrum in strongly imbalanced reflection-driven solar-wind turbulence should follow $E^+(f) \propto f^{-1.51}$, with the same slope for the $z^-$ spectrum because the model assigns identical $\beta$ and $\mu$ to both populations.
  • The structure-function exponents should saturate to $\zeta_n \to 1$ at large $n$, with the full sequence $\zeta_n = 1 - (0.7035)^n$; PSP E1 data in the $200d_i$--$6000d_i$ range agree, while the smaller-scale $8d_i$--$100d_i$ range does not, a discrepancy the paper leaves open.
  • Intermittency here makes the energy-dominating fluctuations at small scales more isotropic than in balanced intermittency models, because the parallel length $l_{(2),\lambda} \propto \lambda^{0.826}$ gives a smaller $l/\lambda$ ratio; this raises their parallel wavenumbers and may trigger more ion cyclotron heating in the corona and solar wind.
  • The strongest fluctuations that control the cascade have amplitudes growing faster than the rms level as $\lambda$ decreases, which enhances stochastic ion heating even before cyclotron resonance becomes relevant.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because $\beta$ comes from a transcendental equation with no dependence on outer-scale parameters, the predicted exponents should be universal across heliocentric distances and solar-wind speeds; testing the same structure-function scalings at other Parker Solar Probe encounters would extend the comparison beyond encounter 1.
  • The model's assignment of identical $\beta$ and $\mu$ to $z^+$ and $z^-$ implies that the minority population's structure functions have the same shape but much smaller amplitude; decomposed measurements of $z^-$ at fixed cross-helicity could test this symmetry directly.
  • The tube-like geometry assumed for the near-tail fluctuations could be checked against the three-dimensional geometry of structure functions in simulations of reflection-driven turbulence; if the geometry is actually sheet-like, the anti-correlation step would need revision while the filling-factor argument might survive.
  • Coupling the $l_{(2),\lambda} \propto \lambda^{0.826}$ scaling to a cyclotron-resonance condition would turn the qualitative ion-cyclotron-heating suggestion into a quantitative heating-rate prediction for coronal holes; the paper does not perform that calculation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This Letter proposes a phenomenological model of strong, imbalanced, reflection-driven MHD turbulence with intermittency. The model represents Elsasser increments at perpendicular scale λ as log-Poisson random variables, assumes a filling factor proportional to λ, and closes the constant-flux condition with an anticorrelation between δz^+_λ and δz^-_λ in the tail of the δz^+_λ distribution. This closure yields β = 2W0(1/2) ≈ 0.7035, leading to specific predictions: structure-function exponents ζ_n = 1 − β^n, an Elsasser spectrum E±(f) ∝ f^−1.51, and a parallel length scaling l_(2),λ ∝ λ^0.826. These predictions are compared with PSP E1 measurements over 200d_i < λ < 6000d_i and with the parallel-length measurements over 8d_i < λ < 3×10^4d_i. The paper also argues that intermittency in this setting makes the energetically dominant small-scale fluctuations more isotropic, in contrast to balanced intermittency models, with possible implications for ion cyclotron heating.

Significance. If the model's central closure is correct, the paper provides a rare parameter-free account of intermittency in imbalanced reflection-driven turbulence: β is fixed internally by the transcendental equation β = −2 ln β rather than fitted, and the predicted ζ_n, spectral slope, and parallel-length exponent are all consequences of that single number. The predicted increase of parallel wavenumber with decreasing scale is a distinctive, falsifiable departure from balanced intermittency models and is directly relevant to ion cyclotron heating in the corona and solar wind. The paper is also transparent about its assumptions, explicitly labeling Eq. (2.20) a conjecture. However, the evidential value of the PSP comparison is weakened by the fact that the same Sioulas et al. (2024) dataset motivates the tube-like geometry and fills in the ζ_n → 1 constraint that fixes the filling-factor scaling. The significance is therefore real but conditional on independent support for the closure.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2, Eq. (2.20)] The anticorrelation closure δz^−_λ ∼ w^−_λ w^+_λ / δz^+_λ is the only step that converts the constant-flux condition (2.18) into β = −2 ln β, thereby fixing the spectral slope, all structure-function exponents, and the parallel-length exponent. The text explicitly labels this a conjecture and provides no independent derivation, numerical test, or observational check of the joint statistics it postulates. The authors should note that a different but equally simple closure, in which δz^+_λ and δz^-_λ are independent, gives β = (√5−1)/2 ≈ 0.618 from the same constant-flux condition, moving the predicted exponents away from the E1 measurements. Without a test of the joint statistics, the PSP agreement cannot be read as evidence for this specific mechanism; I recommend adding a numerical or observational test of Eq. (2.20) or clearly marking the prediction as conditional on the conjecture.
  2. [§4 and §4.1, Eq. (2.6)] The modeling choices that lead to Eq. (2.20) and to the filling-factor scaling are inferred from Sioulas et al. (2024), the same PSP E1 analysis that is later used for comparison. In particular, the tube-like geometry is motivated by the second-order structure function, while ζ_n → 1 is used to justify f_λ ∝ λ; §4.1 itself notes the tension that ζ_n → 1 suggests sheet-like extreme-tail fluctuations and that the observed second-order geometry suggests tube-like fluctuations. This does not invalidate the algebra, but it reduces the force of the agreement shown in Figs. 1–2, because the model and the validation data are not independent. The authors should either validate against a different perihelion, a different scale range, or numerical simulations, or explicitly reframe the PSP comparison as a consistency check rather than an independent test.
  3. [§3, after Fig. 2] The agreement with PSP is confined to 200d_i < λ < 6000d_i for the structure-function exponents; the paper states that the ζ_n values for 8d_i < λ < 100d_i are larger and do not agree with the model, yet no explanation is offered for this scale dependence. Because the model is formally scale-free in the inertial range, the reader cannot tell whether the mismatch indicates a breakdown of the model or a change in the nature of the turbulence at smaller scales. The claim of agreement should be either restricted to the stated range with a clear caveat or accompanied by a discussion of why the smaller-scale range deviates.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§1, second paragraph] The phrase "intrinsically an isotropic" should read "intrinsically anisotropic".
  2. [§2, Eq. (2.12)] The displayed symbol "/greaterorsimilar1" is a formatting corruption; the intended ≥ symbol should be restored.
  3. [§4.1, first paragraph] The acronym "CMS15" is a typo for "CSM15" in the sentence comparing the present model with the earlier balanced-RMHD intermittency models.
  4. [Figure 2 caption] The relation f = U/(2λ) used to shade the comparison range appears only in the figure caption; it should be defined in the main text, since it is needed to map the frequency-domain spectrum to the scale-domain structure functions.
  5. [§3, paragraph 2] The description of the wavelet-based conditional power spectral density is brief; a sentence specifying the wavelet family and any detrending procedure would improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

3 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Two model inputs (tube-like geometry and filling-factor scaling) are inferred from the same PSP E1 data used for validation, making the agreement partly constructed; β itself is solved from a closure, so the core derivation is not self-definitional.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 4, first paragraph (geometry assumption); Section 3 (validation)]
    "Our assumption of tube-like fluctuations is motivated by Sioulas et al. (2024)'s results on the three-dimensional geometry of the second-order structure function of the magnetic field in the scale range 200di < λ < 6000di in PSP data."

    The tube-like geometry is inferred from the same PSP E1 data set (Sioulas et al. 2024) that is later used to validate the model's predicted scalings. This geometry is load-bearing: it motivates the anticorrelation closure (2.20), δz−_λ ∼ w−_λ w+_λ / δz+_λ, which is the equation that converts the constant-flux condition (2.18) into β = −2 ln β and hence β = 0.7035 (2.22–2.23). All reported exponents (spectral slope, structure functions, parallel-length scaling) depend on this β. The model therefore imports a key structural assumption from the very data against which its predictions are compared, so the agreement with E1 is partly constructed rather than an out-of-sample test.

  2. fitted input called prediction [Section 4, first paragraph; Eq. (2.6) and Eq. (2.10)]
    "Sioulas et al. (2024)'s finding that ζn asymptotes to ≃ 1 at large n implies that the volume filling factor of the most intense fluctuations is ∝ λ, consistent with (2.4) and (2.6)."

    The model's filling-factor scaling (2.6), µ = A + ln(L⊥/λ), is justified by the E1 observation that ζ_n → 1 as n → ∞. But in the log-Poisson model this same scaling is exactly what produces the prediction ζ_n = 1 − β^n → 1 (Eq. 2.10). Thus the large-n saturation of the structure-function exponents, which is presented as part of the agreement with PSP E1 data, is not an independent prediction of the model; it is an input used to select the filling-factor scaling. The model independently determines only the rate β at which ζ_n approaches 1, not the asymptote itself.

1 more flagged steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Section 3, first paragraph; Section 4, first paragraph]
    "We compare our model with Sioulas et al.'s (2024) analysis of magnetic-field fluctuations during the first perihelion encounter (E1) of the Parker Solar Probe (PSP)... These shared assumptions receive considerable support from Sioulas et al. (2024)'s results on the structure-function scaling exponents of magnetic fluctuations in the scale range 200di < λ < 6000di in the near-Sun solar wind, which are shown in figure 1."

    The sole benchmark for all three predicted scalings (ζ_n, E±(f), and l_(2),λ) is Sioulas et al. (2024), a paper with overlapping authorship (Sioulas, Bowen, and Chandran are common to both). The same work is also used to justify the two modeling assumptions identified above: the tube-like geometry and the filling-factor scaling ∝ λ. Consequently, the paper's support for its assumptions and its experimental validation both route through the same self-cited analysis. The underlying PSP magnetometer data are external, so this is not a closed logical circle, but the claim of independent agreement is weaker than it would be if the validation data and the data motivating the model inputs were disjoint.

full rationale

The internal derivation is not self-definitional: β = 0.7035 is obtained by solving the transcendental equation β = −2 ln β, which follows from the constant-flux condition (2.18), the log-Poisson ansatz (2.3)–(2.4), and the closure (2.20). No parameter is directly fitted to the reported exponents, and the shape ζ_n = 1 − β^n is not merely a restatement of the inputs. However, the paper's empirical validation is partially circular. The filling-factor scaling (2.6) is adopted and then supported by the E1 observation that ζ_n → 1, while the tube-like geometry—which determines the crucial closure (2.20)—is inferred from the E1 second-order structure function. Those same E1 data are then used to validate the predicted structure functions, spectrum, and parallel-length scaling. Thus the agreement with PSP E1 is partly built in: the data set constrains the model architecture and then is used as the benchmark. The closure (2.20) itself is explicitly labeled a conjecture and has no independent numerical or observational verification; if it were replaced by a different joint statistics of δz+ and δz−, the derived exponents would change. A truly independent test would require a different PSP encounter, a numerical simulation, or another solar-wind data set. For these reasons the paper deserves a moderate circularity score, but not a high one: the central scaling exponents are not trivially forced by a single fitted parameter, and the model does go beyond a pure renaming of observations.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model's scaling exponents are not fitted, but the derivation rests on several borrowed or observationally motivated assumptions. The most delicate is Eq. (2.20), an anticorrelation conjecture with no independent derivation, and the tube-like geometry inferred from the same PSP dataset used for validation.

free parameters (1)
  • A (log-Poisson breadth constant)
    Defined by μ = A + ln(L⊥/λ) in Eq. (2.6). A sets the breadth of the fluctuation-amplitude distribution at the outer scale. It does not enter the predicted scaling exponents, so the model can honestly claim no fitted parameters for scalings, but A remains an undetermined model constant.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Log-Poisson model for fluctuation amplitudes: δz±λ = z± β^q, with q Poisson-distributed with mean μ (Eqs. 2.3 and 2.4).
    Adopted from CSM15 and MS17; not derived from MHD, used to encode intermittency.
  • domain assumption Filling factor of the most intense fluctuations is proportional to λ, giving μ = A + ln(L⊥/λ) (Eq. 2.6).
    Standard assumption in intermittent MHD models; the authors note it is motivated by sheet-like discontinuities and conflicts with their tube-like geometry, requiring a hybrid picture.
  • domain assumption Strong-turbulence critical balance: l−λ ∼ vA λ / δz+λ and l+λ ≃ l−λ (Eqs. 2.13 and 2.14).
    Borrowed from Lithwick, Goldreich, and Sridhar 2007; applied to all fluctuation amplitudes.
  • domain assumption Anomalous coherence: the z+ cascade time is τ+ ∼ λ / δz−λ (Eq. 2.17).
    From Lithwick et al. 2007 and Chandran and Perez 2019; underpins the constant-flux averaging.
  • ad hoc to paper Anticorrelation in the tail: δz−λ ∼ w−λ w+λ / δz+λ in the volume where δz+λ is intense (Eq. 2.20).
    Central conjecture; determines β through Eq. (2.22). It has no derivation, only a plausibility argument based on tube-like geometry.
  • ad hoc to paper Large-amplitude fluctuations are tube-like rather than sheet-like.
    Motivated by Sioulas et al. 2024 PSP observations; contradicts the sheet-like structures in CSM15 and MS17 and is load-bearing for the parallel-length predictions.
  • domain assumption Average cascade flux ⟨ϵ+λ⟩ is independent of λ in the inertial range (Eq. 2.18).
    Standard inertial-range constant-flux assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Intermittent, Reflection-Driven, Strong Imbalanced MHD Turbulence." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZUC3ECCE

@misc{pith2026250204585,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Intermittent, Reflection-Driven, Strong Imbalanced MHD Turbulence},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZUC3ECCE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.04585}
}
read the original abstract

We develop a phenomenological model of strong imbalanced magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) turbulence that accounts for intermittency and the reflection of Alfven waves by spatial variations in the Alfven speed. Our model predicts the slopes of the inertial-range Elsasser power spectra, the scaling exponents of the higher-order Elsasser structure functions, and the way in which the parallel (to the magnetic field) length scale of the fluctuations varies with the perpendicular length scale. These predictions agree reasonably well with measurements of solar-wind turbulence from the Parker Solar Probe (PSP). In contrast to previous models of intermittency in balanced MHD turbulence, we find that intermittency in reflection-driven MHD turbulence increases the parallel wave numbers of the energetically dominant fluctuations at small perpendicular length scales. This, like the PSP measurements with which our model agrees, suggests that turbulence in the solar wind and solar corona may lead to more ion cyclotron heating than previously realized.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.04585 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left: the scaling exponent ζn of the n th-order z + structure function from (2.10) and (2.23), and the scaling exponent of the n th-order magnetic-field structure function obtained by Sioulas et al. (2024) from measurements during PSP’s first perihelion encounter. Right: the power spectrum EB(f) of the magnetic field in PSP encounter-1 data as a function of spacecraft-frame frequency f, as well as the z + power-spec… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The parallel correlation length lλ inferred from PSP magnetic-field measurements (Sioulas et al. 2024), and the l(2),λ scaling from (2.26). The shaded rectangle corresponds to the scale range that was used to calculate the PSP E1 structure-function scaling exponents in figure 1. In figure 2 we plot Sioulas et al.’s (2024) result for the scale-dependent parallel corre￾lation length lλ, which they obtained by comparin… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Bale , S. D. , Badman , S. T. , Bonnell , J. W. , Bowen , T. A. , Burgess , D. , Case , A. W. , Cattell , C. A. , Chandran , B. D. G. , Chaston , C. C. , Chen , C. H. K. , Drake , J. F. , de Wit , T. D. , Eastwood , J. P. , Ergun , R. E. , Farrell , W. M. , Fong , C. , Goetz , K. , Goldstein , M. , Goodrich , K. A. , Harvey , P. R. , Horbury , T. S. , How...

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    Bale , S. D. , Goetz , K. , Harvey , P. R. , Turin , P. , Bonnell , J. W. , Dudok de Wit , T. , Ergun , R. E. , MacDowall , R. J. , Pulupa , M. , Andre , M. , Bolton , M. , Bougeret , J.-L. , Bowen , T. A. , Burgess , D. , Cattell , C. A. , Chandran , B. D. G. , Chaston , C. C. , Chen , C. H. K. , Choi , M. K. , Connerney , J. E. , Cranmer , S. , Diaz-Agu...

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    Strong Imbalanced Turbulence

    Beresnyak , A. & Lazarian , A. 2008 Strong Imbalanced Turbulence . 682 , 1070--1075 , arXiv:arXiv: 0709.0554

    work page Pith review arXiv 2008

  4. [4]

    Bowen , T. A. , Bale , S. D. , Bonnell , J. W. , Dudok de Wit , T. , Goetz , K. , Goodrich , K. , Gruesbeck , J. , Harvey , P. R. , Jannet , G. , Koval , A. , MacDowall , R. J. , Malaspina , D. M. , Pulupa , M. , Revillet , C. , Sheppard , D. & Szabo , A. 2020 A Merged Search-Coil and Fluxgate Magnetometer Data Product for Parker Solar Probe FIELDS . Jour...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2020

  5. [5]

    Chandran , B. D. G. 2008 Strong Anisotropic MHD Turbulence with Cross Helicity . 685 , 646--658 , arXiv:arXiv: 0801.4903

    work page Pith review arXiv 2008

  6. [6]

    Chandran , B. D. G. , Li , B. , Rogers , B. N. , Quataert , E. & Germaschewski , K. 2010 Perpendicular Ion Heating by Low-frequency Alfv \'e n-wave Turbulence in the Solar Wind . 720 , 503--515

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    Chandran , B. D. G. & Perez , J. C. 2019 Reflection-driven magnetohydrodynamic turbulence in the solar atmosphere and solar wind . Journal of Plasma Physics 85 (4), 905850409 , arXiv:arXiv: 1908.00880

    arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    Chandran , B. D. G. , Schekochihin , A. A. & Mallet , A. 2015 Intermittency and Alignment in Strong RMHD Turbulence . 807 , 39 , arXiv:arXiv: 1403.6354

    arXiv 2015

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    & Vishniac , E

    Cho , J. & Vishniac , E. T. 2000 The Anisotropy of Magnetohydrodynamic Alfv \'e nic Turbulence . 539 , 273--282 , arXiv:arXiv: arXiv:astro-ph/0003403

    2000 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Choi , K. P. 1994 On the medians of Gamma distributions and an equation of Ramanujan . Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 62 , 242--251

    1994

  3. [11]

    & Matthaeus , W

    Dmitruk , P. & Matthaeus , W. H. 2003 Low-Frequency Waves and Turbulence in an Open Magnetic Region: Timescales and Heating Efficiency . 597 , 1097--1105

    2003

  4. [12]

    , Alexandrova , O

    Dudok de Wit , T. , Alexandrova , O. , Furno , I. , Sorriso-Valvo , L. & Zimbardo , G. 2013 Methods for Characterising Microphysical Processes in Plasmas . 178 (2-4), 665--693 , arXiv:arXiv: 1306.5303

    2013 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Elsasser , W. M. 1950 The Hydromagnetic Equations . Physical Review 79 , 183--183

    1950

  6. [14]

    1996 Turbulence\/

    Frisch, U. 1996 Turbulence\/ . Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press

    1996

  7. [15]

    , Nazarenko , S

    Galtier , S. , Nazarenko , S. V. , Newell , A. C. & Pouquet , A. 2000 A weak turbulence theory for incompressible magnetohydrodynamics . Journal of Plasma Physics 63 , 447--488

    2000

  8. [16]

    & Sridhar , S

    Goldreich , P. & Sridhar , S. 1995 Toward a theory of interstellar turbulence. 2: Strong alfvenic turbulence . 438 , 763--775

    1995

  9. [17]

    , Krug , J

    Grauer , R. , Krug , J. & Marliani , C. 1994 Scaling of high-order structure functions in magnetohydrodynamic turbulence . Physics Letters A 195 , 335--338

    1994

  10. [18]

    & Olbert , S

    Heinemann , M. & Olbert , S. 1980 Non-WKB Alfven waves in the solar wind . 85 , 1311--1327

    1980

  11. [19]

    Hollweg , J. V. & Isenberg , P. A. 2007 Reflection of Alfv \'e n waves in the corona and solar wind: An impulse function approach . Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics) 112 , 8102--+

    2007

  12. [20]

    Horbury , T. S. , Woolley , T. , Laker , R. , Matteini , L. , Eastwood , J. , Bale , S. D. , Velli , M. , Chandran , B. D. G. , Phan , T. , Raouafi , N. E. , Goetz , K. , Harvey , P. R. , Pulupa , M. , Klein , K. G. , Dudok de Wit , T. , Kasper , J. C. , Korreck , K. E. , Case...

    2020

  13. [21]

    , Sioulas , N

    Huang , Z. , Sioulas , N. , Shi , C. , Velli , M. , Bowen , T. , Davis , N. , Chandran , B. D. G. , Matteini , L. , Kang , N. , Shi , X. , Huang , J. , Bale , S. D. , Kasper , J. C. , Larson , D. E. , Livi , R. , Whittlesey , P. L. , Rahmati , A. , Paulson , K. , Stevens , M. ...

    2023 arXiv

  14. [22]

    Kadomtsev , B. B. & Pogutse , O. P. 1974 Nonlinear helical perturbations of a plasma in the tokamak . Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics 38 , 283--+

    1974

  15. [23]

    Kasper , J. C. , Abiad , R. , Austin , G. , Balat-Pichelin , M. , Bale , S. D. , Belcher , J. W. , Berg , P. , Bergner , H. , Berthomier , M. , Bookbinder , J. , Brodu , E. , Caldwell , D. , Case , A. W. , Chandran , B. D. G. , Cheimets , P. , Cirtain , J. W. , Cranmer , S. R....

    2016

  16. [24]

    Kasper , J. C. , Bale , S. D. , Belcher , J. W. , Berthomier , M. , Case , A. W. , Chandran , B. D. G. , Curtis , D. W. , Gallagher , D. , Gary , S. P. , Golub , L. , Halekas , J. S. , Ho , G. C. , Horbury , T. S. , Hu , Q. , Huang , J. , Klein , K. G. , Korreck , K. E. , Lars...

    2019

  17. [25]

    Kraichnan, R. H. 1965 Inertial-range spectrum of hydromagnetic turbulence . Physics of Fluids 8 , 1385

    1965

  18. [26]

    , Goldreich , P

    Lithwick , Y. , Goldreich , P. & Sridhar , S. 2007 Imbalanced strong MHD turbulence . 655 , 269--274 , arXiv:arXiv: astro-ph/0607243

    2007 arXiv

  19. [27]

    , Klein , K

    Mallet , A. , Klein , K. G. , Chand ran , B. D. G. , Gro s elj , D. , Hoppock , I. W. , Bowen , T. A. , Salem , C. S. & Bale , S. D. 2019 Interplay between intermittency and dissipation in collisionless plasma turbulence . Journal of Plasma Physics 85 (3), 175850302 , arXiv:ar...

    2019 arXiv

  20. [28]

    & Schekochihin , A

    Mallet , A. & Schekochihin , A. A. 2017 A statistical model of three-dimensional anisotropy and intermittency in strong Alfv \'e nic turbulence . 466 , 3918--3927 , arXiv:arXiv: 1606.00466

    2017 arXiv

  21. [29]

    , Schekochihin , A

    Mallet , A. , Schekochihin , A. A. & Chandran , B. D. G. 2015 Refined critical balance in strong Alfv \'e nic turbulence . 449 , L77--L81 , arXiv:arXiv: 1406.5658

    2015 arXiv

  22. [30]

    , Squire , J

    Mallet , A. , Squire , J. , Chandran , B. D. G. , Bowen , T. & Bale , S. D. 2021 Evolution of Large-amplitude Alfv \'e n Waves and Generation of Switchbacks in the Expanding Solar Wind . 918 (2), 62 , arXiv:arXiv: 2104.08321

    2021 arXiv

  23. [31]

    & Goldreich , P

    Maron , J. & Goldreich , P. 2001 Simulations of Incompressible Magnetohydrodynamic Turbulence . 554 , 1175--1196 , arXiv:arXiv: arXiv:astro-ph/0012491

    2001 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Matthaeus , W. H. , Zank , G. P. , Oughton , S. , Mullan , D. J. & Dmitruk , P. 1999 Coronal heating by magnetohydrodynamic turbulence driven by reflected low-frequency waves . 523 , L93--L96

    1999

  25. [33]

    , Squire , J

    Meyrand , R. , Squire , J. , Mallet , A. & Chandran , B. D. G. 2025 Reflection-driven turbulence in the super-Alfv \'e nic solar wind . Journal of Plasma Physics 91 , E29

    2025

  26. [34]

    , Meyer-Vernet , N

    Moncuquet , M. , Meyer-Vernet , N. , Issautier , K. , Pulupa , M. , Bonnell , J. W. , Bale , S. D. , Dudok de Wit , T. , Goetz , K. , Griton , L. , Harvey , P. R. , MacDowall , R. J. , Maksimovic , M. & Malaspina , D. M. 2020 First In Situ Measurements of Electron Density and ...

    2020 arXiv

  27. [35]

    & Turner, L

    Montgomery, D. & Turner, L. 1981 Anisotropic magnetohydrodynamic turbulence in a strong external magnetic field 24 , 825

    1981

  28. [36]

    Ng , C. S. & Bhattacharjee , A. 1996 Interaction of Shear-Alfven Wave Packets: Implication for Weak Magnetohydrodynamic Turbulence in Astrophysical Plasmas . 465 , 845--+

    1996

  29. [37]

    Ng , C. S. & Bhattacharjee , A. 1997 Scaling of anisotropic spectra due to the weak interaction of shear-Alfv \'e n wave packets . Physics of Plasmas 4 , 605--610

    1997

  30. [38]

    & Walden, A

    Percival, D. & Walden, A. 2000 Wavelet Methods for Time Series Analysis\/ . Cambridge University Press

    2000

  31. [39]

    Perez , J. C. & Boldyrev , S. 2009 Role of Cross-Helicity in Magnetohydrodynamic Turbulence . Physical Review Letters 102 (2), 025003--+ , arXiv:arXiv: 0807.2635

    2009 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Perez , J. C. & Chandran , B. D. G. 2013 Direct Numerical Simulations of Reflection-Driven, Reduced MHD Turbulence from the Sun to the Alfven Critical Point . 776 , 124 , arXiv:arXiv: 1308.4046

    2013 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Podesta , J. J. & Bhattacharjee , A. 2010 Theory of Incompressible Magnetohydrodynamic Turbulence with Scale-dependent Alignment and Cross-helicity . 718 , 1151--1157 , arXiv:arXiv: 0903.5041

    2010 arXiv

  34. [42]

    & Pouquet , A

    Politano , H. & Pouquet , A. 1995 Model of intermittency in magnetohydrodynamic turbulence . 52 , 636--641

    1995

  35. [43]

    Schekochihin , A. A. 2022 MHD turbulence: a biased review . Journal of Plasma Physics 88 (5), 155880501

    2022

  36. [44]

    Schekochihin , A. A. , Cowley , S. C. , Dorland , W. , Hammett , G. W. , Howes , G. G. , Quataert , E. & Tatsuno , T. 2009 Astrophysical Gyrokinetics: Kinetic and Fluid Turbulent Cascades in Magnetized Weakly Collisional Plasmas . 182 , 310--377 , arXiv:arXiv: 0704.0044

    2009 arXiv

  37. [45]

    & Leveque , E

    She , Z.-S. & Leveque , E. 1994 Universal scaling laws in fully developed turbulence . Physical Review Letters 72 , 336--339

    1994

  38. [46]

    Shebalin, J. V. , Matthaeus, W. & Montgomery, D. 1983 Anisotropy in MHD turbulence due to a mean magnetic field . Journal of Plasma Physics 29 , 525

    1983

  39. [47]

    , Chandran , B

    Shoda , M. , Chandran , B. D. G. & Cranmer , S. R. 2021 Turbulent Generation of Magnetic Switchbacks in the Alfv \'e nic Solar Wind . 915 (1), 52 , arXiv:arXiv: 2101.09529

    2021 arXiv

  40. [48]

    , Zikopoulos , T

    Sioulas , N. , Zikopoulos , T. , Shi , C. , Velli , M. , Bowen , T. , Mallet , A. , Sorriso-Valvo , L. , Verdini , A. , Chandran , B. D. G. , Martinovi \'c , M. M. , Cerri , S. S. , Davis , N. & Dunn , C. 2024 Higher-Order Analysis of Three-Dimensional Anisotropy in Imbalanced...

    2024 arXiv

  41. [49]

    , Chandran , B

    Squire , J. , Chandran , B. D. G. & Meyrand , R. 2020 In-situ Switchback Formation in the Expanding Solar Wind . 891 (1), L2 , arXiv:arXiv: 2001.08422

    2020 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Strauss , H. R. 1976 Nonlinear, three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamics of noncircular tokamaks . Physics of Fluids 19 , 134--140

    1976

  43. [51]

    & Marsch , E

    Tu , C. & Marsch , E. 1995 MHD structures, waves and turbulence in the solar wind: Observations and theories . Space Science Reviews 73 , 1--210

    1995

  44. [52]

    van Ballegooijen , A. A. & Asgari-Targhi , M. 2016 Heating and Acceleration of the Fast Solar Wind by Alfv \'e n Wave Turbulence . 821 , 106 , arXiv:arXiv: 1602.06883

    2016 arXiv

  45. [53]

    van Ballegooijen , A. A. & Asgari-Targhi , M. 2017 Direct and Inverse Cascades in the Acceleration Region of the Fast Solar Wind . 835 , 10 , arXiv:arXiv: 1612.02501

    2017 arXiv

  46. [54]

    van Ballegooijen , A. A. , Asgari-Targhi , M. , Cranmer , S. R. & DeLuca , E. E. 2011 Heating of the Solar Chromosphere and Corona by Alfv \'e n Wave Turbulence . 736 , 3--+ , arXiv:arXiv: 1105.0402

    2011 arXiv

  47. [55]

    1993 On the propagation of ideal, linear Alfven waves in radially stratified stellar atmospheres and winds

    Velli , M. 1993 On the propagation of ideal, linear Alfven waves in radially stratified stellar atmospheres and winds . 270 , 304--314

    1993

  48. [56]

    , Grappin , R

    Velli , M. , Grappin , R. & Mangeney , A. 1989 Turbulent cascade of incompressible unidirectional Alfven waves in the interplanetary medium . Physical Review Letters 63 , 1807--1810

    1989

  49. [57]

    & Velli , M

    Verdini , A. & Velli , M. 2007 A lfv \'e n waves and turbulence in the solar atmosphere and solar wind . 662 , 669--676 , arXiv:arXiv: arXiv:astro-ph/0702205

    2007 arXiv

  50. [58]

    , Perez , J

    Xia , Q. , Perez , J. C. , Chandran , B. D. G. & Quataert , E. 2013 Perpendicular ion heating by reduced magnetohydrodynamic turbulence . 776 , 90 , arXiv:arXiv: 1309.0742

    2013 arXiv

  51. [59]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year eprint label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sen...

  52. [60]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 gl...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.