Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 66 references

Starburst Galaxies in Their Last Billion Years: An H${\delta}$ Absorption Line Selected Sample

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that a sample of galaxies selected solely by H$\delta$ absorption captures starbursts in their final billion years and shows a spectral aging sequence from burst to quiescence.

desk verdict A useful new Hδ-selected sample with a plausible but not yet nailed-down evolutionary timeline; referee it, but require error bars on the stacked EWs and a softer interpretation of the Hδ-sSFR clock. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.04607 v1 pith:DKCFMPO5 submitted 2025-02-07 astro-ph.GA

Shumei Wu , Jia-Sheng Huang , Cheng Cheng , Y.Sophia Dai This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords starburstgalaxiespost-starburstHδabsorptionlineA-typestarsgalaxyquenchinggreenvalleyMgIIAGNfraction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Using only the strength of the H$\delta$ absorption line, this paper selects 1,323 galaxies from a wide-field spectroscopic survey and argues that these are starburst galaxies in their final billion years, when A-type stars dominate the optical light. The authors classify each galaxy by its UVJ colors, MIPS 24$\mu$m detection, and the ratio of its star formation rate to the main-sequence rate, and find that the galaxies sitting on the main-sequence ridge have the largest H$\delta$ equivalent widths, meaning the maximum A-type star fraction. They read this as the crossing point at which galaxies evolve from starburst to quiescent, and stacked spectra show that MgII and MgI absorption strengthens from star-forming through red-sequence populations, indicating a growing fraction of F- and G-type stars. Only about 7% of the sample hosts an AGN, which the authors interpret as evidence that AGN episodes are short-lived relative to the A-star phase, with the highest AGN rate occurring in red-sequence galaxies that still show 24$\mu$m emission.

What carries the argument

The central object is the H$\delta$ absorption-line equivalent width used as an age tracer, interpreted with the Kauffmann et al. (2003) model in which EW(H$\delta$) rises from a burst, peaks near $4\times10^8$ yr when A stars dominate, and declines to about 2 \AA{} by $10^9$ yr. This is combined with a star-formation-rate normalisation relative to the main sequence (Popesso et al. 2019) and UVJ rest-frame colour boundaries (Muzzin et al. 2013) to split the sample into starburst, main-sequence, and quiescent zones, while stacked MgII/MgI line strengths provide the F/G-star measure that carries the aging argument.

What would settle it

Measure the cold-gas content or merger morphology of the main-sequence galaxies that have the highest H$\delta$ equivalent widths: if many are gas-rich or tidally disturbed, then they are not faded post-starbursts in transit to quiescence, and the monotonic aging track is falsified. A complementary test is to fit full star-formation histories to the stacked spectra and check whether a single SSP-plus-exponential decay reproduces the MgII--H$\delta$ correlation; if a mixed young-plus-old population fits equally well, the inference of a single aging sequence is not unique.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a pure H$\delta$ absorption-line selection, without the [OII] emission cut used in traditional E+A post-starburst searches, captures late-stage starburst galaxies and orders them along an evolutionary sequence from burst to quiescence. In the plane of H$\delta$ equivalent width versus $\mathrm{SFR}/\mathrm{SFR}_{\mathrm{MS}}$, both the starburst and the quiescent populations sit at low H$\delta$, while the main-sequence galaxies peak in H$\delta$ EW, and stacked MgII (2800 \AA) and MgI (2852 \AA) absorption equivalent widths rise from roughly 2.6--3.7 \AA{} in star-forming populations to 6.5--7.2 \AA{} in red-sequence populations. Since MgII lines strengthen from A-type through F- and G-type stars, this rise is presented as direct evidence of a stellar-population aging sequence spanning about $10^9$ years.

Load-bearing premise

The chronological reading of the data assumes that a galaxy's place in the H$\delta$ equivalent width versus star-formation-rate diagram maps monotonically to the time since its last burst, so a secondary burst (for example from merging) does not break the ordering.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A sample selected purely by H$\delta$ absorption, without [OII] cuts, includes dusty and AGN-affected transition galaxies that classical E+A selection misses, giving a more complete census of the starburst-to-quiescent phase.
  • The main sequence in the H$\delta$--sSFR plane marks the evolutionary crossing point, so galaxies found there can be treated as the recently burst, fading population at $0.1<z<0.8$.
  • The observed increase of MgII and MgI absorption toward red-sequence populations implies a measurable buildup of F- and G-type stars over the $\sim 10^9$ yr fading time, which can be used to date the quenching event.
  • The low overall AGN fraction (about 7%) implies that AGN activity is short-lived compared with the A-star phase, while the 30% AGN rate among red-sequence galaxies with MIPS 24$\mu$m emission points to that population as the place where AGN-driven quenching operates.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct extension would be to measure CO or dust-mass gas fractions across the sequence; a smooth decline toward the red sequence would support the monotonic fading track, while gas-rich galaxies in the H$\delta$-peak bin would support a starburst-cyclic picture that the paper itself mentions as a possibility.
  • Because the classification uses normalized SFR and rest-frame UVJ colors rather than observed [OII] fluxes, it can be ported to higher-redshift samples observed with near-infrared spectroscopy, where H$\delta$ is still accessible.
  • The stacking approach predicts a tight correlation between H$\delta$ EW and MgII EW within the main-sequence bin if the sample is a single-age sequence; a wide scatter would indicate composite stellar populations and would weaken the 'last billion years' interpretation.
  • The contrasting AGN fractions between red-sequence galaxies with and without MIPS 24$\mu$m emission suggest a testable scenario in which the final quenching is accompanied by a dust-obscured AGN episode; follow-up X-ray stacking on fainter AGN candidates could check this.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper selects 1323 galaxies from the AGES spectroscopic survey in the Boötes field with rest-frame Hδ absorption equivalent width greater than 2 Å, S/N > 3, and a 5σ continuum requirement, over 0.1 < z < 0.8. It uses UVJ colors and MIPS 24 μm detections to split the sample into four populations, estimates stellar masses and star formation rates from multi-wavelength photometry, and studies the distribution of the sample in the Hδ EW versus sSFR plane. Simple stellar population and exponential-decay star formation history models are used to interpret motion in this plane as an evolutionary sequence from starburst through the main sequence to quiescence. Stacked spectra are used to measure mean MgII, MgI, [OII], and [OIII] equivalent widths in the four populations, and the increase of MgII/MgI absorption from star-forming to red-sequence galaxies is interpreted as growth of the F- and G-type star fraction. The paper also identifies AGNs via [NeV], broad MgII, X-ray, and mid-infrared selection and reports their fraction per population.

Significance. If the central claims are confirmed, the paper would provide a sizable Hδ-selected sample at higher redshift than most previous post-starburst studies and a plausible method for mapping the late stages of starburst evolution. The sample construction is transparent, the iterative emission-plus-absorption decomposition for Hδ is a reasonable approach, and the multi-wavelength coverage in Boötes is a clear strength that allows consistent mass and SFR estimates. The paper also makes a useful, falsifiable observational statement: red-sequence galaxies in this Hδ-selected sample have stronger mean MgII absorption than star-forming galaxies. However, the quantitative support for the evolutionary-stage interpretation is currently incomplete: the stacked equivalent widths in Table 2 are presented without uncertainties, the models in Figure 7 are illustrative rather than fit to the data, and the MgII interpretation does not account for the resonance-line nature of the feature. These issues are load-bearing for the paper's main chronological and stellar-population claims, so the manuscript needs a major revision rather than a minor one.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 5, Table 2] Table 2 reports mean MgII(2800), MgI(2852), [OII](3727), and [OIII](5008) equivalent widths for the four populations without any uncertainties, sample sizes, or significance tests. The paper's central claim that MgII absorption 'substantially increases' from star-forming galaxies (EW ≈ 3.7 Å) to red-sequence galaxies without MIPS detection (EW ≈ 7.2 Å) rests entirely on these values, so without bootstrap or jackknife errors on the stacks, or at least a statement of the number of spectra entering each stack, the difference cannot be evaluated. This is a load-bearing quantitative gap.
  2. [Section 4 and Figure 7] The evolutionary-track interpretation treats a galaxy's position in the Hδ EW versus sSFR plane as a monotonic clock. The curves plotted in Figure 7 are SSP and exponential-decay models with τ = 10^6 and 10^7 yr; they are not fitted to the data and do not include ongoing star formation or multiple bursts. The manuscript itself states that 'galaxy merging can move them up to the starburst region again,' which breaks the monotonic mapping. A main-sequence galaxy with high Hδ EW could be a post-burst descendant, a rejuvenated system, or a continuous star former with a minor recent episode. The claim that these objects are 'passing through' the main sequence from starburst to quiescence therefore needs independent age indicators or an explicit treatment of these alternative paths, rather than relying on the illustrative models alone.
  3. [Section 5 and Figure 10] The inference that increasing MgII absorption traces an increasing fraction of F- and G-type stars is not yet secure because the MgII λλ2796,2803 doublet is a resonance line whose observed absorption can be substantially affected by interstellar gas, outflows, and dust, in addition to stellar photospheric absorption. The paper cites Fanelli et al. (1990) for the stellar spectral dependence, but the stacked spectra in Figure 10 include the full galaxy spectrum, so the MgII feature cannot be assumed to be purely stellar. A stellar-population interpretation requires either a decomposition that separates interstellar from photospheric components or a demonstration that the MgII EW trend is not driven by outflow or covering-fraction effects.
  4. [Section 4, right panel of Figure 6] The statement that galaxies 'passing through the main sequence zone have the maximum fraction of A-type stars' is partly a selection effect. The sample is selected on EW(Hδ) > 2 Å and S/N > 3, so every galaxy in the sample has a measurable A-star population; the main-sequence region in the right panel of Figure 6 is populated by galaxies with the highest Hδ EW, which is expected if the selection preferentially captures the post-burst epoch. To support the chronological interpretation, the paper should compare the Hδ EW distribution in the main-sequence region with that of galaxies below the main sequence and with the selection function of the parent AGES sample, rather than treating the peak as direct evidence of a transition.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 7] The summary contains a duplicated phrase: 'or even already to become a post-starburst galaxy' appears twice in the first paragraph.
  2. [Section 5] The phrase 'no detectable emission orange of H α and [OII] 3727 Å' should read 'no detectable emission lines of H α and [OII] 3727 Å'.
  3. [Table 2 caption] The caption should specify that the equivalent widths are rest-frame, give the number of galaxies in each stack, and state the wavelength range used for the MgII and MgI measurements.
  4. [Figure 7 caption] The caption should define the star formation histories explicitly, including the burst mass fraction, metallicity values, and the exact meaning of the solid, dash-dotted, and dashed curves, so the reader can reproduce the tracks.
  5. [References] The reference for Soifer & Spitzer/NOAO Team (2004) is incomplete; it lists an abstract number but no page or article identifier, which should be corrected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Hδ-selected sample, sSFR/UVJ classification, and MgII spectral measurements are independent observables; the evolutionary interpretation is model-dependent but not fitted to the same data.

full rationale

The paper's central results are empirical associations among independently measured quantities: Hδ equivalent widths measured from AGES spectra, UVJ colors, SFRs estimated from UV/IR photometry, and MgII/MgI equivalent widths from stacked spectra. The evolutionary timeline is anchored to external models (Kauffmann et al. 2003) and to simple stellar-population/exponential-decay tracks in Figure 7, but no parameter of these models is fitted to the Hδ–sSFR distribution of the sample, so the agreement between data and tracks is a genuine comparison rather than a fitted prediction. The main-sequence 'crossing' interpretation is model-dependent: the paper itself notes that 'galaxy merging can move them up to the starburst region again' (Section 4), which breaks a strictly monotonic age clock, but that is a correctness or model-selection concern, not circularity. The only author-overlap citations (e.g., Li et al. 2024 for [NeV] AGN identification; Huang et al. 2013 and Xu et al. 2020 for context) are not load-bearing for the central evolutionary claim, and the MgII stacking results are independent of the UVJ/SFR classification despite being qualitatively consistent with it. I therefore find no specific circular step that can be exhibited as a reduction of a prediction to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central claim depends on a chain of adopted calibrations: IMF, stellar population templates, dust law, UVJ boundaries, the main-sequence relation, and simple SFH tracks. These are standard tools, but their combination determines the population fractions and the evolutionary-stage interpretation. The stacked line measurements lack error bars, and the selection function is acknowledged to be biased, so the scientific output is bounded by these inputs.

free parameters (4)
  • Post-starburst selection thresholds = EW(Hδ) > 4 Å; log10(SFR/SFRMS) < -0.3; UVJ red-sequence colors
    Defined in Section 5 to replace the traditional [OII]-based post-starburst criterion; the -0.3 dex boundary comes from the adopted main-sequence scatter but is used here as a hard class edge.
  • Starburst and quiescent boundaries in SFR/SFRMS = +/-0.3 dex
    Adopted in Section 3.1 to split the sample into starburst, main-sequence, and quiescent classes; the value comes from Popesso et al. (2019) but is used as a hard threshold and affects all reported fractions.
  • Exponential decay timescales in SFH models = tau = 1e6 and 1e7 yr
    Chosen for the illustrative tracks in Figure 7; they set the peak location and width of the Hδ versus sSFR relation used to argue that main-sequence objects are transitional.
  • Dust attenuation prior in SED fits = 0 < Av < 3 mag
    Adopted in Section 3.1 for fastpp fitting; the upper bound affects stellar masses and SFRs for the dustiest galaxies and thus the SFR/SFRMS classification.
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption Flat Lambda-CDM cosmology with Omega_M=0.3, Omega_Lambda=0.7, h=0.7
    Stated in Section 1; all distances, masses, and SFRs depend on this cosmology, but it is the standard assumption in this field and not unique to the paper.
  • domain assumption Chabrier (2003) initial mass function
    Adopted in Section 1 for stellar population modeling; changing the IMF shifts stellar masses and SFRs by a constant factor and could alter the starburst/quiescent fractions.
  • domain assumption Bruzual and Charlot (2003) stellar population synthesis models
    Used in fastpp SED fitting in Section 3.1; the derived stellar masses and dust-corrected SFRs inherit the templates' assumptions about stellar evolution and metallicity.
  • domain assumption Calzetti et al. (2000) dust attenuation law
    Applied to all SED fits and to the UV SFR correction in Equation 4; a different attenuation curve would change the SFR/SFRMS classification, especially for MIPS-nondetected galaxies.
  • domain assumption Kauffmann et al. (2003) Hδ equivalent width evolution model
    Used in Section 4 to argue that the sample spans about 1 Gyr and that EW(Hδ) peaks at 4e8 yr; the model's monotonic rise and fall is the backbone of the evolutionary-stage reading.
  • domain assumption Muzzin et al. (2013) UVJ boundaries separate passive from star-forming galaxies at z<1
    Applied in Section 3.1 to classify the four populations; if the boundaries shift with redshift or dust content, the passive fraction and the post-starburst sample change.
  • domain assumption Popesso et al. (2019) main-sequence relation is valid for the Boötes field at z=0.1-0.8
    Used in Section 3.1 to normalize SFRs and define starburst, main-sequence, and quiescent classes; systematic offsets in the main-sequence calibration would shift all class boundaries.
  • domain assumption MgII absorption strength tracks the F/G star fraction without strong dust or metallicity degeneracy
    Invoked in Section 5 to interpret the stacked MgII equivalent widths as a stellar-population clock; the paper does not model dust, metallicity, or AGN dilution in the stacks.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Starburst Galaxies in Their Last Billion Years: An H${\delta}$ Absorption Line Selected Sample." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DKCFMPO5

@misc{pith2026250204607,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Starburst Galaxies in Their Last Billion Years: An H$\delta$ Absorption Line Selected Sample},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DKCFMPO5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.04607}
}
abstract

In this paper, we focus on the study of starburst galaxies in their final billion years. Our galaxy selection is based solely on the presence of the H${\delta}$ absorption line, which permits tracing the later evolution of starburst galaxies, coinciding with the emergence of A-type stars in these galaxies. We propose a novel method that utilizes star formation rate and UVJ colors to classify galaxies in the sample, and use the spectral features to mark their evolution stages. Our in-depth analysis of the MgII line indicates the substantial increasing of F- and G-type stars when a galaxy evolves from star forming to quiescent phase. Furthermore, we identify AGNs in this sample to explore their roles in the later stage of galaxy star formation history.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.04607 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Examples of our absorption line fitting. The red line model profile represents the final fitting result after 3 iterations. The resulting equivalent width and its redshift are displayed in the upper-left corner, while the object ID is shown in the upper-right corner in each panel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Our sample selection. The black dots represent the measured equivalent width and their errors of Hδ for the entire AGES spectral sample. The red dots indicate our selected sample. Both straight lines represent the two additional selection criteria as discussed in the text. There is a substantial number of galaxies with larger EW(Hδ) and (S/N)EW >3, which are not selected into the sample, due to their lower continuum… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Our sample in the UVJ diagram. The solid lines, taken from (Muzzin et al. 2013), divide the targets into passive galaxies (upper left region) and star-forming galaxies (remaining region). 123 galaxies, including 44 MIPS 24µm sources, are located in the passive galaxy area in this diagram. 2000) to yield a total star formation rate of SFRUV,corr(Chang et al. 2022; Salim & Narayanan 2020): SFRUV,corr[M⊙yr−1 ] = SFRUV … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (9 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Stellar masses of our sample are plotted against their redshifts. We also plot the characteristic masses (M•), which are parameters of Schechter functions fitting to galaxy samples, for red galaxies and the entire galaxy sample in the COSMOS field (Ilbert et al. 2010; …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The color–mass distribution for galaxies in our sample in 4 redshift bins of z = 0.2, 0.4, 0.6 and 0.8. The dashed line represents the criterion separating galaxies in the red sequence and blue cloud, adopted from Borch et al. (2006). Both solid lines define the green …
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Stellar mass (left panel) or Hδ Equivalent width (right panel) versus star formation rate normalized by the model star formation rate for main sequence galaxies at the same redshift (Popesso et al. 2019). We also plot the main sequence as the solid line, and dashed lin…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Hδ Equivalent width versus specific star formation rate. Both grey and red dots are those identified as passive galaxies in the UVJ diagram of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Hδ Equivalent width versus [OII] equivalent width for post-starburst selection. The color coding is as same as in above figures. The red and grey dots are galaxies in the red sequence area in the UVJ diagram. The blue and green dots are star forming galaxies. In this d…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Stacked spectrum of galaxies in four populations. Each spectrum had its continuum subtracted before stacking. The continuum-subtracted spectra and their continua were stacked separately, and the resulting stacked spectrum and continuum were then combined. Galaxies in r…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Stacked spectrum for galaxies in the 2700< λ <2900˚A range for the MgII lines. Spectra are stacked for galaxies at z > 0.35, where this wavelength range is available. The galaxies are categorized in the four populations. The color coding is as defined in [PITH_FULL_I…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Four spectra of galaxies with broad MgII emission lines. The object with the strongest MgII emission lines does not even have [OIII] line. But three of them also have the [NeV] line [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Redshift-Infrared-Luminosity plot illustrating IR, X-ray and broad-line selected AGNs. Infrared Luminosity is defined as the luminosity in the 8< λ <1000µm range, derived using Spitzer MIPS 24, 70, Herschel 250, 350, and 500µm band photometry in the Bo¨otes field (Oli…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    G., Nair, P., McCarthy, P

    Abraham, R. G., Nair, P., McCarthy, P. J., et al. 2007, ApJ, 669, 184, doi: 10.1086/521138

    doi:10.1086/521138 2007

  2. [2]

    J., Le F` evre, O., et al

    Arnouts, S., Walcher, C. J., Le F` evre, O., et al. 2007, A&A, 476, 137, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20077632 An Hδ Absorption Line Selected Sample 15

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20077632 2007

  3. [3]

    K., Glazebrook, K., Brinkmann, J., et al

    Baldry, I. K., Glazebrook, K., Brinkmann, J., et al. 2004, ApJ, 600, 681, doi: 10.1086/380092

    doi:10.1086/380092 2004

  4. [4]

    Beare, R., Brown, M. J. I., Pimbblet, K., Bian, F., & Lin, Y.-T. 2015, ApJ, 815, 94, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/815/2/94

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/815/2/94 2015

  5. [5]

    Beare, R., Brown, M. J. I., Pimbblet, K., & Taylor, E. N. 2019, ApJ, 873, 78, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab041a

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab041a 2019

  6. [7]

    F., Papovich, C., Wolf, C., et al

    Bell, E. F., Papovich, C., Wolf, C., et al. 2005, ApJ, 625, 23, doi: 10.1086/429552

    doi:10.1086/429552 2005

  7. [8]

    B., Couch, W

    Blake, C., Pracy, M. B., Couch, W. J., et al. 2004, MNRAS, 355, 713, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08351.x

    work page arXiv 2004

  8. [9]

    F., et al

    Borch, A., Meisenheimer, K., Bell, E. F., et al. 2006, A&A, 453, 869, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20054376

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20054376 2006

Show all 66 references
  1. [10]

    Brand, K., Brown, M. J. I., Dey, A., et al. 2006, ApJ, 641, 140, doi: 10.1086/500312

    2006 doi

  2. [12]

    C., et al

    Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, 682, doi: 10.1086/308692

    2000 doi

  3. [13]

    I., Lilly, S

    Caputi, K. I., Lilly, S. J., Aussel, H., et al. 2009, ApJ, 707, 1387, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/707/2/1387

    2009 doi

  4. [14]

    2003, PASP, 115, 763, doi: 10.1086/376392

    Chabrier, G. 2003, PASP, 115, 763, doi: 10.1086/376392

    2003 doi

  5. [15]

    2022, ApJ, 936, 47, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8748

    Chang, W., Fang, G., Gu, Y., et al. 2022, ApJ, 936, 47, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8748

    2022 doi

  6. [16]

    2001, ApJ, 556, 562, doi: 10.1086/321609

    Chary, R., & Elbaz, D. 2001, ApJ, 556, 562, doi: 10.1086/321609

    2001 doi

  7. [17]

    2024, ApJ, 961, 216, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1510

    Cheng, Z., Li, C., Li, N., Yan, R., & Mo, H. 2024, ApJ, 961, 216, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1510

    2024 doi

  8. [18]

    P., Naab, T., & Johansson, P

    Choi, E., Ostriker, J. P., Naab, T., & Johansson, P. H. 2012, ApJ, 754, 125, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/754/2/125

    2012 doi

  9. [19]

    Ciotti, L., & Ostriker, J. P. 2001, ApJ, 551, 131, doi: 10.1086/320053

    2001 doi

  10. [20]

    P., & Proga, D

    Ciotti, L., Ostriker, J. P., & Proga, D. 2009, ApJ, 699, 89, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/89

    2009 doi

  11. [21]

    L., Songaila, A., Hu, E

    Cowie, L. L., Songaila, A., Hu, E. M., & Cohen, J. G. 1996, AJ, 112, 839, doi: 10.1086/118058

    1996 doi

  12. [23]

    L., Rieke, G

    Donley, J. L., Rieke, G. H., P´ erez-Gonz´ alez, P. G., Rigby, J. R., & Alonso-Herrero, A. 2007, ApJ, 660, 167, doi: 10.1086/512798

    2007 doi

  13. [24]

    2021, ApJ, 907, 114, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abd17c

    Dou, J., Peng, Y., Renzini, A., et al. 2021, ApJ, 907, 114, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abd17c

    2021 doi

  14. [25]

    Dressler, A., & Gunn, J. E. 1983, ApJ, 270, 7, doi: 10.1086/161093

    1983 doi

  15. [26]

    R., Stern, D., Brodwin, M., et al

    Eisenhardt, P. R., Stern, D., Brodwin, M., et al. 2004, ApJS, 154, 48, doi: 10.1086/423180

    2004 doi

  16. [27]

    J., Gonzalez, A

    Elston, R. J., Gonzalez, A. H., McKenzie, E., et al. 2006, ApJ, 639, 816, doi: 10.1086/499423

    2006 doi

  17. [28]

    2006, ApJL, 641, L93, doi: 10.1086/504111

    Taniguchi, K. 2006, ApJL, 641, L93, doi: 10.1086/504111

    2006 doi

  18. [29]

    M., Willmer, C

    Faber, S. M., Willmer, C. N. A., Wolf, C., et al. 2007, ApJ, 665, 265, doi: 10.1086/519294

    2007 doi

  19. [30]

    Fabian, A. C. 1999, MNRAS, 308, L39, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.03017.x

    1999

  20. [31]

    2005, PASP, 117, 1411, doi: 10.1086/497385

    Fabricant, D., Fata, R., Roll, J., et al. 2005, PASP, 117, 1411, doi: 10.1086/497385

    2005 doi

  21. [32]

    N., O’Connell, R

    Fanelli, M. N., O’Connell, R. W., Burstein, D., & Wu, C.-C. 1990, ApJ, 364, 272, doi: 10.1086/169411

    1990 doi

  22. [33]

    2018, A&A, 617, A62, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833281

    Feltre, A., Bacon, R., Tresse, L., et al. 2018, A&A, 617, A62, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833281

    2018 doi

  23. [34]

    2004, A&A, 424, 23, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20035626

    Fontana, A., Pozzetti, L., Donnarumma, I., et al. 2004, A&A, 424, 23, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20035626

    2004 doi

  24. [35]

    2013, ApJ, 775, 124, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/775/2/124

    Fu, L., & Li, X.-D. 2013, ApJ, 775, 124, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/775/2/124

    2013 doi

  25. [36]

    2004, AJ, 128, 2652, doi: 10.1086/425552

    Glazebrook, K., Tober, J., Thomson, S., Bland-Hawthorn, J., & Abraham, R. 2004, AJ, 128, 2652, doi: 10.1086/425552

    2004 doi

  26. [37]

    2005, MNRAS, 357, 937, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08701.x —

    Goto, T. 2005, MNRAS, 357, 937, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08701.x —. 2007, MNRAS, 381, 187, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12227.x

    2005

  27. [38]

    E., Danieli, S., Carlsten, S., et al

    Greene, J. E., Danieli, S., Carlsten, S., et al. 2023, ApJ, 949, 94, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc58c

    2023 doi

  28. [39]

    F., Hernquist, L., Cox, T

    Hopkins, P. F., Hernquist, L., Cox, T. J., et al. 2005, ApJ, 630, 705, doi: 10.1086/432438

    2005 doi

  29. [40]

    2006, ApJS, 163, 50, doi: 10.1086/499493

    Springel, V. 2006, ApJS, 163, 50, doi: 10.1086/499493

    2006 doi

  30. [41]

    S., Faber, S

    Huang, J. S., Faber, S. M., Willmer, C. N. A., et al. 2013, ApJ, 766, 21, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/766/1/21

    2013 doi

  31. [42]

    2010, ApJ, 709, 644, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/709/2/644

    Ilbert, O., Salvato, M., Le Floc’h, E., et al. 2010, ApJ, 709, 644, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/709/2/644

    2010 doi

  32. [43]

    J., Le F` evre, O., et al

    Ilbert, O., McCracken, H. J., Le F` evre, O., et al. 2013, A&A, 556, A55, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321100

    2013 doi

  33. [44]

    T., & Dey, A

    Jannuzi, B. T., & Dey, A. 1999, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 191, Photometric Redshifts and the Detection of High Redshift Galaxies, ed. R. Weymann, L. Storrie-Lombardi, M. Sawicki, & R. Brunner, 111

    1999

  34. [45]

    M., White, S

    Kauffmann, G., Heckman, T. M., White, S. D. M., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 341, 33, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06291.x

    2003

  35. [46]

    S., Forman, W

    Kenter, A., Murray, S. S., Forman, W. R., et al. 2005, ApJS, 161, 9, doi: 10.1086/444379

    2005 doi

  36. [47]

    S., Eisenstein, D

    Kochanek, C. S., Eisenstein, D. J., Cool, R. J., et al. 2012, ApJS, 200, 8, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/200/1/8 16 Wu et al

    2012 doi

  37. [48]

    N., Hardcastle, M

    Kondapally, R., Best, P. N., Hardcastle, M. J., et al. 2021, A&A, 648, A3, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038813

    2021 doi

  38. [49]

    G., Labb´ e, I., et al

    Kriek, M., van Dokkum, P. G., Labb´ e, I., et al. 2009, ApJ, 700, 221, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/700/1/221

    2009 doi

  39. [50]

    S., Huang, J

    Li, Z.-J., Dai, Y. S., Huang, J. S., Wuyts, S., & Cao, T.-W. 2024, ApJ, 963, 99, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1b54

    2024 doi

  40. [51]

    C., Fanson, J., Schiminovich, D., et al

    Martin, D. C., Fanson, J., Schiminovich, D., et al. 2005, ApJL, 619, L1, doi: 10.1086/426387

    2005 doi

  41. [52]

    C., Carroll, C

    Masini, A., Hickox, R. C., Carroll, C. M., et al. 2020, ApJS, 251, 2, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/abb607

    2020 doi

  42. [53]

    S., Kenter, A., Forman, W

    Murray, S. S., Kenter, A., Forman, W. R., et al. 2005, ApJS, 161, 1, doi: 10.1086/444378

    2005 doi

  43. [54]

    2013, ApJ, 777, 18, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/777/1/18

    Muzzin, A., Marchesini, D., Stefanon, M., et al. 2013, ApJ, 777, 18, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/777/1/18

    2013 doi

  44. [55]

    J., Bock, J., Altieri, B., et al

    Oliver, S. J., Bock, J., Altieri, B., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 424, 1614, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20912.x

    2012

  45. [56]

    2019, MNRAS, 483, 3213, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty3210

    Popesso, P., Concas, A., Morselli, L., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 483, 3213, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty3210

    2019 doi

  46. [57]

    D., Hogg, D

    Quintero, A. D., Hogg, D. W., Blanton, M. R., et al. 2004, ApJ, 602, 190, doi: 10.1086/380601

    2004 doi

  47. [58]

    H., Alonso-Herrero, A., Weiner, B

    Rieke, G. H., Alonso-Herrero, A., Weiner, B. J., et al. 2009, ApJ, 692, 556, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/692/1/556

    2009 doi

  48. [59]

    2020, ARA&A, 58, 529, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-032620-021933

    Salim, S., & Narayanan, D. 2020, ARA&A, 58, 529, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-032620-021933

    2020 doi

  49. [60]

    Silk, J., & Rees, M. J. 1998, A&A, 331, L1, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9801013

    1998 doi arXiv

  50. [61]

    T., & Spitzer/NOAO Team

    Soifer, B. T., & Spitzer/NOAO Team. 2004, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 204, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts #204, 48.05

    2004

  51. [62]

    2014, MNRAS, 444, 2870, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1569

    Wang, L., Viero, M., Clarke, C., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 2870, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1569

    2014 doi

  52. [63]

    M., et al

    Wang, T., Elbaz, D., Alexander, D. M., et al. 2017, A&A, 601, A63, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526645

    2017 doi

  53. [64]

    R., Davidzon, I., Toft, S., et al

    Weaver, J. R., Davidzon, I., Toft, S., et al. 2023, A&A, 677, A184, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245581

    2023 doi

  54. [65]

    E., Franx, M., Leja, J., et al

    Whitaker, K. E., Franx, M., Leja, J., et al. 2014, ApJ, 795, 104, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/795/2/104

    2014 doi

  55. [66]

    S., Huang, J.-S., et al

    Xu, H., Dai, Y. S., Huang, J.-S., et al. 2020, ApJ, 905, 103, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abbeff

    2020 doi

  56. [67]

    A., Faber, S

    Yan, R., Newman, J. A., Faber, S. M., et al. 2009, MNRAS, 398, 735, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15192.x

    2009

  57. [68]

    I., Zaritsky, D., & Mihos, J

    Yang, Y., Zabludoff, A. I., Zaritsky, D., & Mihos, J. C. 2008, ApJ, 688, 945, doi: 10.1086/591656

    2008 doi

  58. [69]

    I., Zaritsky, D., Lin, H., et al

    Zabludoff, A. I., Zaritsky, D., Lin, H., et al. 1996, ApJ, 466, 104, doi: 10.1086/177495

    1996 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.