Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Large Language Models Meet Symbolic Provers for Logical Reasoning Evaluation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.06563 v2 pith:FJMVCPCP submitted 2025-02-10 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords reasoningevaluationframeworkproverqadatasetlanguagelargellms
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

First-order logic (FOL) reasoning, which involves sequential deduction, is pivotal for intelligent systems and serves as a valuable task for evaluating reasoning capabilities, particularly in chain-of-thought (CoT) contexts. Existing benchmarks often rely on extensive human annotation or handcrafted templates, making it difficult to achieve the necessary complexity, scalability, and diversity for robust evaluation. To address these limitations, we propose a novel framework called ProverGen that synergizes the generative strengths of Large Language Models (LLMs) with the rigor and precision of symbolic provers, enabling the creation of a scalable, diverse, and high-quality FOL reasoning dataset, ProverQA. ProverQA is also distinguished by its inclusion of accessible and logically coherent intermediate reasoning steps for each problem. Our evaluation shows that state-of-the-art LLMs struggle to solve ProverQA problems, even with CoT prompting, highlighting the dataset's challenging nature. We also finetune Llama3.1-8B-Instruct on a separate training set generated by our framework. The finetuned model demonstrates consistent improvements on both in-distribution and out-of-distribution test sets, suggesting the value of our proposed data generation framework. Code available at: https://github.com/opendatalab/ProverGen

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Symbolic Neural Generation with Applications to Lead Discovery in Drug Design

    cs.LG 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A hybrid system that learns symbolic interval constraints from a few examples and uses an LLM plus rejection filtering to generate new candidate drug molecules.

  2. Logical Reasoning with Outcome Reward Models for Test-Time Scaling

    cs.CL 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Outcome reward models trained on multi-sample chain-of-thought plus deliberately flawed 'echo' rationales improve Best-of-N test-time verification for deductive reasoning.

  3. Faithful and Robust LLM-Driven Theorem Proving for NLI Explanations

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The proposed Faithful-Refiner, combining syntactic parsing, quantifier and consistency checks, logical-relation guidance, and detailed proof feedback, raises explanation refinement rates on three NLI benchmarks by lar...

Pith tools