Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Soliton microcombs in X-cut LiNbO3 microresonators

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read TE-polarized soliton microcombs at 25 GHz are generated on X-cut thin-film lithium niobate by rotating the racetrack's straight sections so the mode's polarization lies perpendicular to the optical axis, suppressing the Raman gain that…

desk verdict First TE soliton microcombs on X-cut TFLN, with clean soliton evidence; the Raman-suppression mechanism is plausible but not fully isolated from device-Q differences. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.07180 v1 pith:M4364O2R submitted 2025-02-11 physics.optics

Binbin Nie , Xiaomin Lv , Chen Yang , Rui Ma , Kaixuan Zhu , Ze Wang , Yanwu Liu , Zhenyu Xie
show 10 more authors
Xing Jin Guanyu Zhang Du Qian Zhenyu Chen Qiang Luo Shuting Kang Guowei Lv Qihuang Gong Fang Bo Qi-Fan Yang
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords solitonmicrocombthin-filmlithiumniobateX-cutTFLNRamannonlinearityopticalfrequencycombmicroresonatorracetrackresonatorelectro-opticintegration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports the first soliton microcombs on X-cut thin-film lithium niobate (TFLN), a platform prized for co-integrating high-speed modulators and frequency doublers but previously blocked from soliton formation by strong Raman gain. The authors show that the block is orientation-dependent: if the straight sections of a racetrack resonator hold the TE mode polarized perpendicular to the crystal's optical axis, the Raman response drops, and a continuous-wave pump produces 25 GHz soliton microcombs spanning over 200 nm. With a pulsed pump, the span extends beyond 350 nm. If the claim holds, it removes the last major obstacle to fully monolithic, fast-tunable and self-referenced microcombs on lithium niobate.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing element is the racetrack geometry itself. Because most of the mode energy lives in the straight waveguides, rotating the straight sections by 90 degrees relative to the optical axis switches the dominant contribution from extraordinary (strong Raman) to ordinary (weak Raman) light behavior, without changing material or etch process. This polarization-orientation design rule is what suppresses stimulated Raman scattering enough for soliton formation; auxiliary-laser thermal control and wavelength-dependent coupling losses are supporting tools used to reach and stabilize the soliton state.

What would settle it

Fabricate two racetrack resonators with identical geometry, etch depth, and loaded Q near 3 million, differing only in straight-section orientation, and compare the threshold for Raman lasing and the existence of soliton steps; if the perpendicular-oriented device still shows strong Raman lasing or no soliton access, the orientation rule is not the enabling mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that TE-polarized soliton microcombs can be generated in X-cut TFLN microresonators by orienting the racetrack so that the polarization of the TE mode in the long straight waveguides is perpendicular to the optical axis. In this orientation the Raman peaks A(TO)1 and A(TO)4 fall to roughly 40% and 20% of their parallel-polarization intensity, suppressing Raman lasing and letting Kerr soliton formation win. The resulting single-soliton state has an $sech^{2}$ spectrum, a 25.037 GHz repetition-rate beat note, and more than 200 nm span under CW pumping; under pulsed pumping the span reaches about 350 nm, with deviations below 1470 nm attributed to birefringence-induced TE-TM mixing. The paper claims this removes the previously identified Raman barrier specific to X-cut TFLN while retaining the platform's electro-optic and nonlinear advantages.

Load-bearing premise

The claim rests on the assumption that the difference between the two devices comes from the orientation-dependent Raman response, not from the different Q factors or other fabrication variations, and that the polarization-dependent Raman spectra measured on the planar film transfer to the etched waveguide mode.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Monolithic X-cut TFLN chips can now combine soliton microcombs with high-speed electro-optic modulators and PPLN frequency doublers on one platform, enabling on-chip feedback control of both repetition rate and carrier-envelope offset.
  • The orientation rule applies to smaller racetracks with larger free-spectral ranges, so repetition rates in the hundreds of gigahertz, suited to wavelength-division multiplexing, become accessible on the same platform.
  • With pulsed pumping, the 350 nm span brings octave-spanning combs within reach once dispersion engineering and power budgets are improved, allowing on-chip f-2f self-referencing.
  • The same ordinary-versus-extraordinary polarization lever helps suppress Raman parasitics in other anisotropic photonic platforms, notably lithium tantalate, as the paper notes from prior work.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's two-point comparison (parallel vs. perpendicular) leaves the threshold angle untested; a natural extension would be to map soliton existence across intermediate orientation angles (15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 75°) to find where Raman lasing yields to Kerr solitons.
  • One could also rotate only the pump-coupling section rather than the whole racetrack, trading Raman suppression against modal confinement—an optimization the paper does not explicitly explore.
  • The 200 nm CW span at 25 GHz repetition implies tens of thousands of comb lines, so a practical test would be to demonstrate error-free wavelength-division multiplexed transmission on a subset of those lines.
  • The observed TE-TM mixing below 1470 nm suggests that birefringence engineering, such as waveguide width tuning, could flatten and extend the spectrum without changing the orientation design rule.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports the generation of TE-polarized soliton microcombs in X-cut thin-film lithium niobate (TFLN) racetrack microresonators, with a repetition rate of about 25 GHz and spectral spans beyond 200 nm under continuous-wave pumping and about 350 nm under pulsed pumping. The proposed enabling mechanism is the orientation of the racetrack straight sections relative to the optical axis so that the TE mode is polarized perpendicular to the optical axis, thereby reducing the Raman response that has previously hindered soliton formation on this platform. The manuscript presents Raman spectroscopy of an X-cut film, device characterization (Q factor, coupling, dispersion), and demonstrations of soliton steps, sech2-shaped spectra, and narrow beatnotes for both CW and pulse-pumped operation.

Significance. If the orientation-based Raman suppression is validated, this result is significant because it opens a route toward monolithically integrated X-cut TFLN photonics combining soliton microcombs with high-speed electro-optic modulators and efficient frequency doublers. The direct evidence for soliton microcombs is solid: discrete soliton steps in the transmitted power, sech2-shaped spectral envelopes, and a narrow 25.037 GHz beatnote. The reproducibility of the core observation across CW and pulse pumping strengthens the demonstration. However, the causal claim that the improved soliton generation is due specifically to the polarization-orientation-dependent Raman response is not yet established with the two-device comparison presented.

major comments (3)
  1. [Results, Fig. 2c-f; Fig. 3b] The central claim that device (ii) supports soliton microcombs because of reduced Raman nonlinearity is not isolated from a difference in resonator Q. Device (i) is reported to have a loaded Q of approximately 1e6, while device (ii) is reported to have an intrinsic Q up to 3e6. Soliton threshold and thermal stability depend strongly on Q, so the failure of device (i) to reach the soliton state could be due to its lower Q rather than to the orientation-dependent Raman gain. The authors should present a matched-Q comparison, or at minimum a quantitative estimate showing that the orientation-induced Raman gain reduction exceeds the Q-related change in soliton threshold, before claiming the design rule is validated.
  2. [Raman response, Fig. 2a,b; Methods] The polarization-dependent Raman spectra are measured on the planar X-cut TFLN film in a free-space backscattering geometry, not on the confined TE waveguide mode inside the etched racetrack. The effective Raman gain for a waveguide mode depends on the mode's electric-field polarization components, including any sidewall-angle-induced components, so the free-space angular scaling may not transfer directly to the waveguide geometry. Furthermore, the A(TO)1 mode retains about 40% of its peak intensity at 90 degrees (Fig. 2b), and no measurement or estimate is given for the stimulated Raman threshold relative to the soliton formation threshold in the actual device. The authors should provide waveguide-level Raman gain calculations or a direct measurement of Raman suppression in the etched waveguide to support the causal mechanism.
  3. [Fig. 4c; Fig. 5c; Extended Data Fig. 1] The spectral-span claims of 'more than 200 nm' (CW) and 'about 350 nm' (pulsed) are based on measured spectra that show significant deviations from the sech2 envelope due to mode crossings and birefringence-induced mode mixing, particularly below 1470 nm. This does not undermine the existence of solitons, but it makes the practical usable bandwidth unclear. The authors should specify the wavelength range over which the comb lines follow the soliton envelope and are coherent, rather than quoting the raw spectral extent.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Introduction] In the introduction, 'remarkedly enhanced' should be 'remarkably enhanced'.
  2. [Fig. 1 caption] The caption contains a typo: 'T echnologies' should be 'Technologies'.
  3. [Fig. 5 caption] The right inset caption reads 'electrical beanote' and should read 'electrical beatnote'.
  4. [Fig. 2a] The y-axis label 'Raman scattering spectrum (a.u.)' appears to be shared by several panels; please clarify the scaling between the angle-dependent spectra.
  5. [Fig. 3d] The fit range for the parabolic dispersion (D2/2pi = 24.4 kHz) is not specified; the mode-crossing deviations near 1560 nm and 1610 nm are visible, and stating the exact fitting window would make the D2 value reproducible.
  6. [Data availability] The data and code availability statements say that materials are available 'upon reasonable request'; depositing the soliton spectra, beatnote recordings, and dispersion data in a public repository would improve reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: experimental demonstration with independently measured Raman input; soliton observation is external evidence.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is an experimental observation: soliton microcombs generated in X-cut TFLN racetracks with a specific straight-section orientation. The Raman angular dependence is measured independently by Raman microscopy on the planar film (Fig. 2a-b); the angular fit is used as a design heuristic, not as a fitted parameter that directly yields the comb spectrum. The soliton states are identified by characteristic sech2 envelopes and electrical beat notes, which are external signatures, not outputs of a fitted model. The auxiliary-laser thermal stabilization and pulse-pumped operation are standard techniques referenced to prior work; the self-citations (refs 16, 33) concern dark-pulse and tunable microcombs on the same platform and are not invoked to define or force the X-cut orientation result. The sech2 fitting is a consistency check, not a derivation. The main weakness—that the two-device comparison does not control loaded versus intrinsic Q—is a confound affecting causal attribution (Raman suppression vs Q), but it does not make the derivation circular; the observation of soliton microcombs stands regardless. No load-bearing step reduces to its own inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard soliton theory, on the transfer of bulk Raman measurements to a waveguide mode, and on the two devices being otherwise comparable. No new physical entities are introduced. The main fitted quantities (D2 and Raman angular fits) are characterization parameters rather than free parameters used to force the result.

free parameters (2)
  • D2/2pi (second-order dispersion) = 24.4 kHz
    Parabolic fit to measured integrated dispersion (Fig. 3d). Used to show anomalous dispersion; characterization, not used to force the main result.
  • Raman angular fit parameters for A(TO)1 and A(TO)4 = Not stated
    The 'Fitting' curves in Fig. 2b are not accompanied by the functional form or parameter values, so the 40%/20% reduction claim cannot be independently reproduced.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Dissipative Kerr soliton theory: sech2 spectral envelope and soliton step correspond to single-soliton states.
    Used to identify the observed states as solitons (Figs. 4b,c, 5b,c). Standard in the field but not proven in this paper.
  • domain assumption Bulk polarization-dependent Raman measurements transfer to the guided TE mode in the etched waveguide.
    The design rule relies on Fig. 2a,b measured on the planar film being representative of the mode's Raman gain in the racetrack. Not explicitly discussed in the paper.
  • domain assumption Devices (i) and (ii) differ only in straight-section orientation relative to the optical axis.
    The causal attribution of soliton formation to reduced Raman response assumes Q and other fabrication parameters are not the deciding difference. The paper reports different Q factors (1e6 loaded vs 3e6 intrinsic), so this assumption is imperfect.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Soliton microcombs in X-cut LiNbO3 microresonators." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/M4364O2R

@misc{pith2026250207180,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Soliton microcombs in X-cut LiNbO3 microresonators},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/M4364O2R}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.07180}
}
read the original abstract

Chip-scale integration of optical frequency combs, particularly soliton microcombs, enables miniaturized instrumentation for timekeeping, ranging, and spectroscopy. Although soliton microcombs have been demonstrated on various material platforms, realizing complete comb functionality on photonic chips requires the co-integration of high-speed modulators and efficient frequency doublers, features that are available in a monolithic form on X-cut thin-film lithium niobate (TFLN). However, the pronounced Raman nonlinearity associated with extraordinary light in this platform has so far precluded soliton microcomb generation. Here, we report the generation of transverse-electric-polarized soliton microcombs with a 25 GHz repetition rate in high-Q microresonators on X-cut TFLN chips. By precisely orienting the racetrack microresonator relative to the optical axis, we mitigate Raman nonlinearity and enable soliton formation under continuous-wave laser pumping. Moreover, the soliton microcomb spectra are extended to 350 nm with pulsed laser pumping. This work expands the capabilities of TFLN photonics and paves the way for the monolithic integration of fast-tunable, self-referenced microcombs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 2 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. High-efficiency and broadband coherent optical comb generation in integrated X-cut lithium niobate microresonators

    physics.optics 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    A new microresonator design generates efficient, flat, low-threshold normal-dispersion light combs on X-cut lithium niobate, plus a novel combined Kerr-Raman comb state spanning 33 THz.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    et al.Lithium niobate photonics: Unlocking the electromagnetic spectrum

    Boes, A. et al.Lithium niobate photonics: Unlocking the electromagnetic spectrum. Science 379, eabj4396 (2023)

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Zhu, D. et al. Integrated photonics on thin-film lithium niobate. Adv. Opt. Photonics13, 242–352 (2021)

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    Wang, C. et al. Integrated lithium niobate electro-optic modulators operating at CMOS-compatible voltages. Na- ture 562, 101–104 (2018)

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Xu, M. et al. High-performance coherent optical modu- lators based on thin-film lithium niobate platform. Nat. Commun. 11, 3911 (2020)

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    Wang, C. et al. Ultrahigh-efficiency wavelength conver- sion in nanophotonic periodically poled lithium niobate waveguides. Optica 5, 1438–1441 (2018)

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Lu, J. et al. Periodically poled thin-film lithium niobate microring resonators with a second-harmonic generation efficiency of 250,000%/W. Optica 6, 1455–1460 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Chen, P.-K. et al. Adapted poling to break the nonlinear efficiency limit in nanophotonic lithium niobate waveg- uides. Nat. Nanotechnol. 19, 44–50 (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    J., Holzwarth, R

    Kippenberg, T. J., Holzwarth, R. & Diddams, S. Microresonator-based optical frequency combs. Science 332, 555–559 (2011)

    work page 2011

Show all 60 references
  1. [9]

    & Bowers, J

    Chang, L., Liu, S. & Bowers, J. E. Integrated optical frequency comb technologies. Nat. Photon. 16, 95–108 (2022)

    2022

  2. [10]

    Spencer, D. T. et al. An optical-frequency synthesizer using integrated photonics. Nature 557, 81–85 (2018)

    2018

  3. [11]

    Newman, Z. L. et al. Architecture for the photonic in- tegration of an optical atomic clock. Optica 6, 680–685 (2019)

    2019

  4. [12]

    Feldmann, J. et al. Parallel convolutional processing us- ing an integrated photonic tensor core. Nature 589, 52– 58 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    He, Y. et al. Self-starting bi-chromatic LiNbO 3 soliton microcomb. Optica 6, 1138–1144 (2019)

    2019

  6. [14]

    & Tang, H

    Gong, Z., Liu, X., Xu, Y. & Tang, H. X. Near-octave lithium niobate soliton microcomb. Optica 7, 1275–1278 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    Gong, Z. et al. Soliton microcomb generation at 2 µm in z-cut lithium niobate microring resonators. Opt. Lett. 44, 3182–3185 (2019)

    2019

  8. [16]

    Lv, X. et al. Broadband microwave-rate dark pulse microcombs in dissipation-engineered LiNbO 3 microres- onators. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.19584(2024)

    2024 arXiv

  9. [17]

    et al.Broadband electro-optic frequency comb generation in a lithium niobate microring resonator

    Zhang, M. et al.Broadband electro-optic frequency comb generation in a lithium niobate microring resonator. Na- ture 568, 373–377 (2019)

    2019

  10. [18]

    & Schwefel, H

    Rueda, A., Sedlmeir, F., Kumari, M., Leuchs, G. & Schwefel, H. G. Resonant electro-optic frequency comb. Nature 568, 378–381 (2019)

    2019

  11. [19]

    Hu, Y. et al. High-efficiency and broadband on-chip electro-optic frequency comb generators. Nat. Photon. 16, 679–685 (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    Wang, P.-Y. et al. Octave soliton microcombs in lithium niobate microresonators. Opt. Lett. 49, 1729–1732 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    & Lonˇ car, M

    Song, Y., Hu, Y., Zhu, X., Yang, K. & Lonˇ car, M. Octave-spanning Kerr soliton frequency combs in dispersion-and dissipation-engineered lithium niobate microresonators. Light Sci. Appl.13, 225 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    & Weber, M

    Schaufele, R. & Weber, M. Raman scattering by lithium niobate. Phys. Rev. 152, 705 (1966)

    1966

  15. [23]

    Okawachi, Y. et al. Competition between Raman and Kerr effects in microresonator comb generation. Opt. Lett. 42, 2786–2789 (2017)

    2017

  16. [24]

    Wang, C. et al. Monolithic lithium niobate photonic cir- cuits for Kerr frequency comb generation and modula- tion. Nat. commun. 10, 978 (2019)

    2019

  17. [25]

    Yu, M. et al. Raman lasing and soliton mode-locking in lithium niobate microresonators. Light Sci. Appl. 9, 9 (2020)

    2020

  18. [26]

    Gong, Z. et al. Photonic dissipation control for Kerr soliton generation in strongly Raman-active media. Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 183901 (2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    Marin-Palomo, P. et al. Microresonator-based solitons for massively parallel coherent optical communications. Nature 546, 274 (2017)

    2017

  20. [28]

    Y., Yi, X

    Suh, M.-G., Yang, Q.-F., Yang, K. Y., Yi, X. & Vahala, K. J. Microresonator soliton dual-comb spectroscopy. Science 354, 600–603 (2016)

    2016

  21. [29]

    Bao, C. et al. Architecture for microcomb-based GHz- mid-infrared dual-comb spectroscopy. Nat. Commun.12, 6573 (2021)

    2021

  22. [30]

    & Proust, C

    Repelin, Y., Husson, E., Bennani, F. & Proust, C. Ra- man spectroscopy of lithium niobate and lithium tanta- late. Force field calculations. J. Phys. Chem. Solids60, 819–825 (1999)

    1999

  23. [31]

    Wang, C. et al. Lithium tantalate photonic integrated circuits for volume manufacturing. Nature 1–7 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    Ji, X. et al. Compact, spatial-mode-interaction-free, ultralow-loss, nonlinear photonic integrated circuits. Commun. Phys. 5, 84 (2022)

    2022

  25. [33]

    He, Y. et al. High-speed tunable microwave-rate soliton microcomb. Nat. Commun. 14, 3467 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    Herr, T. et al. Temporal solitons in optical microres- onators. Nat. Photon. 8, 145–152 (2014)

    2014

  27. [35]

    & Vahala, K

    Carmon, T., Yang, L. & Vahala, K. Dynamical thermal behavior and thermal self-stability of microcavities. Opt. Express 12, 4742–4750 (2004)

    2004

  28. [36]

    et al.Fundamental charge noise in electro-optic 7 photonic integrated circuits

    Zhang, J. et al.Fundamental charge noise in electro-optic 7 photonic integrated circuits. Nat. Phys. 1–8 (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    Y., Suh, M.-G

    Yi, X., Yang, Q.-F., Yang, K. Y., Suh, M.-G. & Vahala, K. Soliton frequency comb at microwave rates in a high- Q silica microresonator. Optica 2, 1078–1085 (2015)

    2015

  30. [38]

    Brasch, V. et al. Photonic chip–based optical frequency comb using soliton Cherenkov radiation. Science 351, 357–360 (2016)

    2016

  31. [39]

    Zhou, H. et al. Soliton bursts and deterministic dissipa- tive Kerr soliton generation in auxiliary-assisted micro- cavities. Light Sci. Appl.8, 50 (2019)

    2019

  32. [40]

    Zhang, S. et al. Sub-milliwatt-level microresonator soli- tons with extended access range using an auxiliary laser. Optica 6, 206–212 (2019)

    2019

  33. [41]

    Lu, Z. et al. Deterministic generation and switching of dissipative Kerr soliton in a thermally controlled micro- resonator. AIP Adv.9 (2019)

    2019

  34. [42]

    & Herr, T

    Obrzud, E., Lecomte, S. & Herr, T. Temporal solitons in microresonators driven by optical pulses. Nat. Photon. 11, 600 (2017)

    2017

  35. [43]

    Li, J. et al. Efficiency of pulse pumped soliton micro- combs. Optica 9, 231–239 (2022)

    2022

  36. [44]

    Obrzud, E. et al. A microphotonic astrocomb. Nat. Pho- ton. 13, 31 (2019)

    2019

  37. [45]

    Anderson, M. H. et al. Zero dispersion Kerr solitons in optical microresonators. Nat. commun. 13, 4764 (2022)

    2022

  38. [46]

    Xiao, Z. et al. Near-zero-dispersion soliton and broadband modulational instability Kerr microcombs in anomalous dispersion. Light Sci. Appl.12, 33 (2023)

    2023

  39. [47]

    & Yamamoto, S

    Murata, H., Morimoto, A., Kobayashi, T. & Yamamoto, S. Optical pulse generation by electrooptic-modulation method and its application to integrated ultrashort pulse generators. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quant 6, 1325–1331 (2000)

    2000

  40. [48]

    Zhang, J. et al. Ultrabroadband integrated electro-optic frequency comb in lithium tantalate. Nature 1–8 (2025)

    2025

  41. [49]

    & Zhou, B

    Xue, X., Zheng, X. & Zhou, B. Super-efficient temporal solitons in mutually coupled optical cavities. Nat. Pho- ton. 13, 616–622 (2019)

    2019

  42. [50]

    Helgason, ´O. B. et al. Surpassing the nonlinear conver- sion efficiency of soliton microcombs. Nat. Photon. 17, 992–999 (2023)

    2023

  43. [51]

    & Vahala, K

    Yang, Q.-F., Hu, Y., Torres-Company, V. & Vahala, K. Efficient microresonator frequency combs. eLight 4, 18 (2024)

    2024

  44. [52]

    Yu, M. et al. Integrated femtosecond pulse generator on thin-film lithium niobate. Nature 612, 252–258 (2022)

    2022

  45. [53]

    Gao, Y. et al. Compact lithium niobate microring res- onators in the ultrahigh Q/V regime.Opt. Lett.48, 3949– 3952 (2023)

    2023

  46. [54]

    Xue, X. et al. Mode-locked dark pulse Kerr combs in normal-dispersion microresonators. Nat. Photon.9, 594– 600 (2015)

    2015

  47. [55]

    Xue, X. et al. Dispersion-less Kerr solitons in spectrally confined optical cavities. Light Sci. Appl.12, 19 (2023)

    2023

  48. [56]

    Wu, T.-H. et al. Visible-to-ultraviolet frequency comb generation in lithium niobate nanophotonic waveguides. Nat. Photon. 18, 218–223 (2024)

    2024

  49. [57]

    Lu, X. et al. Emerging integrated laser technologies in the visible and short near-infrared regimes. Nat. Photon. 18, 1010–1023 (2024)

    2024

  50. [58]

    Isichenko, A. et al. Photonic integrated beam delivery for a rubidium 3D magneto-optical trap. Nat. Commun. 14, 3080 (2023)

    2023

  51. [59]

    Hummon, M. T. et al. Photonic chip for laser stabiliza- tion to an atomic vapor with 10 −11 instability. Optica 5, 443–449 (2018)

    2018

  52. [60]

    & Levy, U

    Stern, L., Desiatov, B., Goykhman, I. & Levy, U. Nanoscale light–matter interactions in atomic cladding waveguides. Nat. Commun. 4, 1548 (2013). Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate Not applicable. Consent for publication Not applicable. Data availability Th...

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.