Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

MEMIT-Merge: Addressing MEMIT's Key-Value Conflicts in Same-Subject Batch Editing for LLMs

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.07322 v3 pith:RPFTB2J3 submitted 2025-02-11 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords editingmemitbatchknowledgememit-mergesubjectaddressingconflicts
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As large language models continue to scale up, knowledge editing techniques that modify models' internal knowledge without full retraining have gained significant attention. MEMIT, a prominent batch editing algorithm, stands out for its capability to perform mass knowledge modifications. However, we uncover that MEMIT's editing efficacy significantly deteriorates when processing batches containing multiple edits sharing the same subject. Our analysis reveals this stems from MEMIT's key value modeling framework: identical keys (derived from the shared subject) are forced to represent different values (corresponding to different knowledge), resulting in update conflicts during editing. Addressing this issue, we propose MEMIT-Merge, an enhanced approach that merges value computation processes for facts sharing the same subject, effectively resolving the performance degradation in samesubject batch editing scenarios. Experimental results demonstrate that when MEMIT's edit success rate drops to around 50% at larger batch sizes, MEMIT-Merge maintains a success rate exceeding 90%, showcasing remarkable robustness to subject entity collisions. The code is available at https://github.com/NUSTM/ MEMIT-Merge.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ChainEdit: Propagating Ripple Effects in LLM Knowledge Editing through Logical Rule-Guided Chains

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    ChainEdit uses knowledge-graph logical rules, filtered by an LLM, to propagate a single fact edit to dependent facts and lifts logical generalization on RIPPLE EDITS by about 40 points.

Pith tools