Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 47 references

Two Channel Multi impurity Kondo model

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that with three or more two-channel Kondo impurities, the RKKY interaction between overscreened spins is a relevant perturbation that drives the system to a new $O_3(N)$ Wess-Zumino-Novikov-Witten quantum critical point…

desk verdict Plausible new route to local quantum criticality, but the paper's headline γ exponent is internally inconsistent between the N=3 Bethe ansatz and the general CFT formula. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.07506 v5 pith:DVLONOX7 submitted 2025-02-11 cond-mat.str-el

A. M. Tsvelik , G. Kotliar This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords two-channelKondoeffectRKKYinteractionquantumcriticalpointWess-Zumino-Novikov-Wittenmodelnon-FermiliquidoverscreenedimpuritiesMajoranafermionsclusterDMFT
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Two-channel Kondo impurities are a textbook source of non-Fermi-liquid behavior at a single impurity, but their mutual interactions are usually thought to compete with Kondo screening. This paper argues the opposite for the overscreened spin sector: when three or more two-channel Kondo impurities sit in the same host, the RKKY exchange generated between them is a relevant perturbation, even when it is much weaker than the Kondo temperature. The renormalization-group flow ends at a new quantum critical point described by an $O_3(N)$ Wess-Zumino-Novikov-Witten model with a conformally invariant boundary condition, where the spin operator has scaling dimension $1/(N+1)$ and the Sommerfeld coefficient diverges as $\gamma \sim T^{-3/(N+1)}$. If correct, this gives a concrete route to local quantum criticality in multichannel Kondo lattices, magnetic impurities in Majorana metals, and cluster DMFT studies.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing identity is the conformal embedding $O_1(3N) = O_3(N) \times O_N(3)$. The $3N$ Majorana modes of the bulk split into an $O_3(N)$ sector, which absorbs the impurities and becomes quantum critical, and an idle $O_N(3)$ sector. In the impurity model, the RKKY coupling assembles the $O_3(N)$ Kac-Moody currents $J_{ij}=i(\vec{\chi}_i\cdot\vec{\chi}_j)$ and the $o(N)$ generators $s_{ij}=i\xi_i\xi_j$, making the problem an $n=3$ channel Kondo problem with orthogonal symmetry. For $N=3$ the model maps onto the integrable XXZ six-channel Kondo model, whose Bethe ansatz supplies the ground-state entropy and the low-temperature specific-heat behavior.

What would settle it

Run a numerical renormalization-group or tensor-network simulation of the full N=3 multi-impurity action (12) with the dropped H-term retained, at temperatures well below $T_{\mathrm{RKKY}}$: if the low-energy spectrum and impurity entropy match the $O_3(3)=SU_6(2)$ WZNW fixed point, the neglect of H is justified, whereas growth of the H-term to relevance would invalidate the effective action (9).

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the RKKY interaction between overscreened spins in a two-channel Kondo model is marginally relevant once the number of impurities satisfies $N\ge 3$, generating a new low-energy fixed point rather than simply competing with the Kondo effect. The construction starts from the Majorana/drone representation of the single-impurity two-channel Kondo fixed point: each impurity carries three band Majoranas $\chi^a_n$ and a local Majorana zero mode $\xi_n$, and fusing the irrelevant four-fermion operators at different sites produces an RKKY term $\bar{I}(R_{nm})\xi_n\xi_m(\vec{\chi}_n\cdot\vec{\chi}_m)$. Because this coupling has a positive sign, it grows under renormalization and generates a crossover scale $T_{\mathrm{RKKY}}$, taking the system from the $SU_2(2)$ two-channel critical point at high energies to a multi-impurity $O_3(N)$ WZNW critical point at low energies; for $N=3$ the symmetry is $O_3(3)\equiv SU_6(2)$, the six-channel Kondo model. At the fixed point the impurity spin has conformal dimension $1/(N+1)$, so its correlation function behaves as $|\sin(\pi T\tau)|^{-2/(N+1)}$, and the leading irrelevant operator controls the impurity free energy, giving the claimed divergent Sommerfeld coefficient $\gamma \sim T^{-3/(N+1)}$.

Load-bearing premise

The argument hinges on dropping the H-term, the drone-fermion tunneling generated alongside the RKKY coupling, using the dilute-limit inequalities $H\ll T_K$ and $\rho(\epsilon_F)I\ll T_K$, which the paper flags as a strong self-consistency requirement but does not justify in detail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For three or more impurities, the two-channel Kondo critical point is unstable against the RKKY interaction, which flows to a new stable $O_3(N)$ WZNW critical point even when the RKKY scale lies far below $T_K$.
  • The spin correlation function becomes more singular with increasing $N$, with exponent $2/(N+1)$, so the magnetic response at the new fixed point is stronger than the logarithmic response of the single-impurity two-channel Kondo model.
  • The impurity contribution to the Sommerfeld coefficient diverges as $\gamma \sim T^{-3/(N+1)}$, a sharp non-Fermi-liquid signature measurable in specific-heat experiments.
  • For $N=3$, the Bethe ansatz yields a ground-state entropy $S(0)=\ln\sqrt{2+\sqrt{2}}$ and a specific heat controlled by the first Kac-Moody descendant of the adjoint primary field.
  • In cluster DMFT of the two-channel Kondo lattice, if the impurity self-energy stays finite at low frequency, the self-consistent hybridization function is regular and the paramagnetic phase flows to the new fixed point, offering an explanation of local quantum criticality.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper states the dilute-limit condition $H\ll T_K$, $\rho(\epsilon_F)I\ll T_K$ as a strong self-consistency requirement, but the promised later justification does not appear; whether the neglected $H$-term remains irrelevant at the new fixed point is the main open gap between the effective action (9) and the full model.
  • The same conformal embedding suggests a family of generalizations: if the number of Majorana species $n$ differed from 3, the critical point would be an $O_n(N)$ WZNW model with exponents set by $N+n-2$, so the mechanism may extend to other multichannel Kondo systems.
  • The predicted $\gamma \sim T^{-3/(N+1)}$ divergence is a testable signature for numerical simulations: a cluster DMFT or exact-diagonalization study of the two-channel Kondo lattice in the paramagnetic phase should see the specific-heat coefficient grow with this temperature exponent rather than saturate as in a Fermi liquid.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that in a two-channel Kondo model with N impurities, the RKKY interaction generated by fusing single-impurity irrelevant operators is relevant for N >= 3, driving the system to a new quantum critical point. The low-energy theory is argued to be an O_3(N) WZNW model with a conformally invariant boundary condition, giving a spin-operator scaling dimension 1/(N+1) and a Sommerfeld coefficient gamma ~ T^{-3/(N+1)}. The authors support the N=3 case with Bethe-ansatz thermodynamics and generalize to arbitrary N via the conformal embedding O_1(3N) = O_3(N) x O_N(3). They also discuss applications to Majorana metals and cluster DMFT for two-channel Kondo lattices.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper identifies a new mechanism by which a weak RKKY coupling between overscreened impurities generates, rather than destroys, quantum criticality, with explicit conformal-field-theory predictions for spin correlations and specific heat. The construction is elegant: no parameters are fitted, the N=3 Bethe-ansatz check is a genuine cross-check, and the connection to cluster DMFT gives concrete experimental relevance. However, the manuscript contains an internal inconsistency in the specific-heat exponent for N=3 and a load-bearing approximation (neglect of the H-term) whose promised self-consistency justification is never delivered. The paper's strengths are its clear physical picture and the use of exact methods where available; the weaknesses are these unresolved technical points.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and Eq. (13) vs Eq. (15)] The headline prediction gamma ~ T^{-3/(N+1)} is internally inconsistent with the paper's own N=3 Bethe-ansatz result. Equation (LABEL:eq15) with h_adj = (N-2)/(N+1) gives F_irrel ~ -a T (T/T_RKKY)^{h_adj}, hence gamma = C/T ~ T^{h_adj-1} = T^{-3/(N+1)}, which for N=3 yields gamma ~ T^{-3/4}. However, the N=3 section states that the leading irrelevant operator has conformal dimension h=1/4 and gives C_imp ~ (T/T_RKKY)^{1/2}, i.e., gamma ~ T^{-1/2}. These two exponents differ by a factor of 3/2 and cannot both describe the same fixed point. The discrepancy must be resolved: either the N=3 Bethe-ansatz identification of the leading irrelevant operator is wrong, or the general formula for h_adj in Eq. (15) is misapplied, or the abstract and Eq. (15) do not follow from the stated O_3(N) construction.
  2. [Section 'Construction of the effective theory', Eq. (8)] The neglect of the H-term xi1 d_tau xi2 is load-bearing for the effective action (9), but the promised discussion of the self-consistency conditions H << T_K and rho(epsilon_F) I << T_K is never provided. The text says 'This is a strong self-consistency requirement which will be discussed later,' yet no later section returns to this point. Without a quantitative estimate of H and I in terms of the impurity separation and the Fermi-surface parameters, it is not established that the regime where the RKKY term is relevant coincides with the regime where the H-term can be dropped. If the H-term cannot be neglected, the effective action (9) is incomplete and the claimed O_3(N) fixed point may not be the low-energy limit.
  3. [Section 'Three impurities' and Eq. (12)] The N=3 Hamiltonian (12) is stated to be equivalent to an XXZ 6-channel Kondo model only asymptotically at T << T_K when the first term in (12) can be neglected. The crossover scale T_RKKY is given as T_K exp[-1/(2 rho(epsilon_F) I)], but the derivation that this scale is well separated from T_K under the conditions in Eq. (8) is not given. Since the claimed flow goes from the single-impurity two-channel fixed point at high energies to the 6-channel fixed point at low energies, the separation of scales T_RKKY << T_K is essential; the manuscript asserts this via the exponential form but does not show that rho(epsilon_F) I remains small when the RKKY coupling runs.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Introductory paragraph] The phrase 'when the number of impurities N is greater than 3' in the abstract should read 'greater than or equal to 3', since the N=3 case is analyzed in detail.
  2. [Section 'Three impurities'] The sentence 'The first term in the Hamiltonian (12) is irrelevant, but it prevents the model from being exactly solvable in the entire range of temperatures from T_K to zero' is followed by the Bethe-ansatz treatment only for |I_1| = |I_2| < I_3. The text should clarify whether the isotropic case, which is the one emphasized in the rest of the paper, is also covered by the Bethe-ansatz solution or only by the anisotropic limit.
  3. [Section 'Renormalization Group Flow Conformal Field Theory and generalization to arbitrary N'] The statement that the O_3(N) part of the impurity spin 'becomes a singlet with the conformal dimension zero' is introduced as an assumption ('It is reasonable to assume') but is then used to derive the central scaling dimension h_S = 1/(N+1). This should be flagged explicitly as an assumption rather than a derived result, and its validity should be discussed in the context of the boundary condition of the O_3(N) WZNW model.
  4. [Appendix B, Eq. (30)] The formula for the magnetic moment M in Eq. (30) is presented without a derivation of the contour deformation that gives the leading power law; the text states 'the result is' and then gives the final expression. Adding a brief outline of the Wiener-Hopf solution would improve reproducibility.
  5. [References] Reference [9] in the introduction appears to be inserted mid-sentence after '[6-8]. [9].' and the sentence is grammatically broken. Also, Ref. [12] and Ref. [13] appear to be two versions of the same paper (Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 2808 (1995) and Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 10020 (1994)); the latter seems to have an incorrect volume/page number.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central exponents follow from external exact Bethe-ansatz and WZNW results, not from fitted parameters or self-citations.

full rationale

The paper's derivation is not circular. The single-impurity Majorana mapping is cited to standard work [23], and the key multi-impurity effective action (9) is obtained by an explicit operator-product fusion (Eqs. 4–7) using the Majorana Green's function, with no parameter fitted to the target scaling. The criticality of the resulting multichannel model is attributed to Ref. [19], an external reference by G. Li, Y. Oreg, and J. I. Väyrynen, not to the present authors. The N=3 thermodynamics are taken from the Bethe-ansatz solution of the XXZ chain and the multichannel Kondo model, cited to [25] and [28] (and [44]); these are independent exact results with stated assumptions that do not include the claimed exponents. The general conformal dimensions are computed from standard WZNW Casimirs and the conformal embedding O_1(nN) = O_n(N) × O_N(n), which is a textbook mathematical structure. The spin scaling dimension 1/(N+1) follows by arithmetic from the Majorana dimension splitting, not by construction from the desired answer. The paper's self-citations (e.g., [23], [27], [28], [44]) support auxiliary ingredients but are not load-bearing in the sense of forcing the target result by definition. Two genuine weaknesses are present but are not circularity: (i) the paper's own N=3 Bethe-ansatz result C_imp ~ (T/T_RKKY)^{1/2} implies γ ~ T^{-1/2}, while the abstract's general formula and Eq. (15) with h_adj = 1/4 imply γ ~ T^{-3/4}; this is an internal inconsistency, not a circular reduction. (ii) The text says the neglect of the H-term will be justified later ('This is a strong self-consistency requirement which will be discussed later'), but no later justification appears; that is an omitted proof or missing support, not a circular step. Neither issue involves fitting a parameter and then predicting that same parameter, nor importing a result whose conclusion is the paper's own premise. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks, and the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new entities are introduced and no parameters are fitted to data. The derivation rests on standard conformal field theory, the Bethe ansatz of the multichannel Kondo model, and several explicitly stated modeling assumptions that are not fully justified.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Conformal embedding O_1(nN) = O_n(N) x O_N(n) and WZNW conformal dimensions from Ref. [29].
    Used to identify the critical theory and compute h_adj and h_S; this is a prior mathematical result, not derived in the paper.
  • domain assumption Dilute-limit self-consistency (8): H << T_K and rho(epsilon_F) I << T_K, allowing neglect of the H-term in Eq. (4).
    The paper states this is a strong requirement and promises later discussion, but no justification is provided.
  • ad hoc to paper The O_3(N) part of the impurity spin becomes a singlet with conformal dimension zero, leaving h_S=1/(N+1).
    Explicitly introduced as 'reasonable to assume' in the RG/CFT section; it is load-bearing for the abstract's spin scaling dimension.
  • domain assumption For N=3, the exact Bethe ansatz applies only for anisotropic couplings |I1|=|I2|<I3 and asymptotically at T << T_K; these results are extended to the isotropic case.
    The Bethe ansatz solution in the appendix is for anisotropic couplings; the isotropic critical behavior is inferred from this.
  • domain assumption Cluster DMFT application assumes the impurity self-energy does not diverge at low frequency, so the hybridization function remains regular.
    Explicitly stated as a heavy reliance in the DMFT section of the paper.
  • domain assumption The RKKY coupling sign is positive, making the interaction marginally relevant for N greater than or equal to 3.
    Follows from Eq. (5), but the sign and strength depend on the bulk band structure; no exceptions are discussed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Two Channel Multi impurity Kondo model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DVLONOX7

@misc{pith2026250207506,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Two Channel Multi impurity Kondo model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DVLONOX7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.07506}
}
abstract

We show that the Ruderman-Kittel-Kasua-Yoisida interaction between overscreened spins in two channel Kondo impurity systems is a relevant perturbation when the number of impurities N is greater than 3 driving the system to a new quantum critical point with anomalous dimensions $\frac{1}{ (N+1)} $ for the spin operator and the Sommerfeld coefficient of the specific heat scales as $\gamma \sim T^{- \frac{3}{N+1}}$. The critical point universal properties are relevant to many strong correlation problems, such as impurity placed in a Majorana metal and the multichannel Kondo lattice model of heavy fermion materials. We discuss relevance of our results for cluster DMFT studies of quantum criticality.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.07506 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The diagrams involved in the generation of fusion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. The suggested picture of the renormalization group [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Majorana Fermi surface of the YL model on hyper [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [19]

    Altland, B

    A. Altland, B. Beri, R. Egger, and A. M. Tsvelik, Multi- channel kondo impurity dynamics in a majorana device, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 076401 (2014)

    work page 2014

  2. [1]

    Bethe ansatz for N = 3. The thermodynamic equations The TBA equations for the k-channel Kondo model with anisotropy and S=1/2 impurity are [28]: ϕj = s ∗ ln(1 + eϕj−1 )(1 + eϕj+1 ) − δj,ke−πλ, j = 1, ...ν− 2, ν = π/γ, (33) ϕν = ϕν−1 = s ∗ ln(1 + eϕν−2 ), and the free energy is F = Fbulk + 1 L Fimp, (34) Fbulk = −T 2 Z dλe−πλ ln(1 + eϕk(λ)), (35) Fimp = −T...

    work page

  3. [2]

    Its conformal dimension at the critical point is h = j(j + 1)/(k + 2) which for j = 1, k= 6 yields 1/4

    The leading irrelevant opera- tor which determines the temperature dependence of the impurity contribution to the specific heat, is the first Kac-Moody descendant of the primary field in the ad- joint representation J−1Φad j. Its conformal dimension at the critical point is h = j(j + 1)/(k + 2) which for j = 1, k= 6 yields 1/4. The impurity free energy sc...

    work page

  4. [3]

    A. C. Hewson, The Kondo Problem to Heavy Fermions, Cambridge Studies in Magnetism, Vol. 2 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1993)

    work page 1993

  5. [4]

    C. M. Varma, P. B. Littlewood, S. Schmitt-Rink, E. Abrahams, and A. E. Ruckenstein, Phenomenology of the normal state of cu-o high-temperature supercon- ductors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 1996 (1989)

    work page 1989

  6. [5]

    Q. Si, S. Rabello, K. Ingersent, and J. L. Smith, Locally critical quantum phase transitions in strongly correlated metals, Nature 413, 804 (2001)

    2001

  7. [6]

    Oeschler, S

    N. Oeschler, S. Hartmann, A. Pikul, C. Krellner, C. Geibel, and F. Steglich, Low-temperature specific heat of ybrh2si2, Physica B: Condensed Matter 403, 1254 (2008)

    work page 2008

  8. [7]

    X. Guo, J. Chen, F. Hoveyda-Marashi, S. L. Bettler, D. Chaudhuri, C. S. Kengle, J. A. Schneeloch, R. Zhang, G. Gu, T.-C. Chiang, A. M. Tsvelik, T. Faulkner, P. W. Phillips, and P. Abbamonte, Conformally invari- ant charge fluctuations in a strange metal, arXiv preprint (2024), arXiv:2411.11164 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2024

Show all 47 references
  1. [8]

    N. J. Craig, J. M. Taylor, E. Lester, C. M. Marcus, M. Hanson, and A. C. Gossard, Tunable nonlocal spin control in a coupled-quantum dot system, Science 7, 901 (2011)

    2011

  2. [9]

    Bork, Y.-h

    J. Bork, Y.-h. Zhang, L. Diekh¨ oner, L. Borda, P. Simon, J. Kroha, P. Wahl, and K. Kern, A tunable two-impurity kondo system in an atomic point contact, Nat. Phys. 7, 901 (2011)

    2011

  3. [10]

    Spinelli, M

    A. Spinelli, M. Gerrits, R. Toscovic, B. Bryant, M. Ternes, and A. F. Otte, Exploring the phase diagram of the two-impurity kondo problem, Nat. Comm.6, 10046 (2015)

    2015

  4. [11]

    Keller, L

    A. Keller, L. Peeters, C. P. Moca, I. Weymann, D. Ma- halu, V. G. Umansky, Zar´ and, and D. Goldhaber- Gordon, Universal fermi liquid crossover and quantum criticality in a mesoscopic system, Nature 526, 237 (2015)

    2015

  5. [12]

    Eickhoff and F

    F. Eickhoff and F. B. Anders, Spectral properties of strongly correlated multi-impurity models in the kondo insulator regime: Emergent coherence, metallic surface states, and quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. B104, 165105 (2021)

    2021

  6. [13]

    Jones and C

    B. Jones and C. Varma, Critical point in the solution of the 2 magnetic impurity problem, Phys. Rev. B 40, 324 (1989)

    1989

  7. [14]

    Georges and A

    A. Georges and A. M. Sengupta, Solution of the two- impuirity, two-channel kondo model, Phys. Rev. Lett.74, 2808 (1995)

    1995

  8. [15]

    Georges and A

    A. Georges and A. M. Sengupta, Solution of the two- impuirity, two-channel kondo model, Phys. Rev. Lett.49, 10020 (1994)

    1994

  9. [16]

    Ingersent, A

    K. Ingersent, A. W. W. Ludwig, and I. Affleck, Kondo screening in a magnetically frustrated nanostructure: Ex- act results on a stable non-fermi-liquid phase, Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 257204 (2005)

    2005

  10. [17]

    Beri and N

    B. Beri and N. Cooper, Topological kondo effect with majorana fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 156803 (2012)

    2012

  11. [18]

    Altland and R

    A. Altland and R. Egger, Multiterminal coulomb- majorana junction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 196401 (2013)

    2013

  12. [20]

    Altland, B

    A. Altland, B. Beri, R. Egger, and A. M. Tsvelik, Bethe ansatz solution of the topological kondo model, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 47, 265001 (2014)

    2014

  13. [21]

    G. Li, Y. Oreg, and J. I. V´ ayrynen, Multichannel topo- logical kondo effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 066302 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    D. L. Cox, Resistivity of the two-channel kondo model in infinite dimensions (1994), arXiv:cond-mat/9405049 [cond-mat]

    1994 arXiv

  15. [23]

    M. Lenk, F. Gao, J. Kroha, and H. A. Nevidomskyy, Strange-metal behavior without fine-tuning in prv 2al20, Phys. Rev. Res 6, L042008 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    Sakai and S

    A. Sakai and S. Nakatsuji, Kondo effects and multi- polar order in the cubic prtr 2al20 (tr=ti, v), Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 80, 063701 (2011), https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.80.063701

    2011 doi

  17. [25]

    Coleman, L

    P. Coleman, L. B. Ioffe, and A. M. Tsvelik, Simple for- mulation of the two-channel kondo model, Phys. Rev. B 52, 6611 (1995)

    1995

  18. [26]

    Ingersent, B

    K. Ingersent, B. A. Jones, and J. W. Wilkins, Study of the two-impurity, two-channel kondo hamiltonian, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2594 (1992)

    1992

  19. [27]

    A. N. Kirillov and N. Y. Reshetikhin, Exact solution of the integrable xxz heisenberg model with arbitrary spin: I. the ground state and the excitation spectrum, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 20, 1565 (1987)

    1987

  20. [28]

    A. N. Kirillov and N. Y. Reshetikhin, Exact solution of the integrable xxz heisenberg model with arbitrary spin: I. the ground state and the excitation spectrum, Zap. Nauch. Seminar. LOMI 145, 109 (1985)

    1985

  21. [29]

    A. M. Tsvelik, Toulouse limit of the multichannel kondo model, Phys. Rev. B 52, 4366 (1995)

    1995

  22. [30]

    A. M. Tsvelik, Thermodynamics of the multi-channel kondo problem, J. Phys. C: Cond.Mat. 18, 159 (1985)

    1985

  23. [31]

    Kimura, Abcd of the kondo effect, J

    T. Kimura, Abcd of the kondo effect, J. Phys. Soc. Jap. 90, 024708 (2021)

    2021

  24. [32]

    Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solvable model and be- yond, Ann

    A. Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solvable model and be- yond, Ann. Phys. 321, 2 (2006)

    2006

  25. [33]

    Hermanns and S

    M. Hermanns and S. Trebst, Quantum spin liquid with a majorana fermi surface on the three-dimensional hype- roctogon lattice, Phys. Rev. B 89, 235102 (2014)

    2014

  26. [34]

    O’Brien, M

    K. O’Brien, M. Hermanns, and S. Trebst, Classification of gapless z 2 spin liquids in three-dimensional kitaev mod- els, Phys. Rev. B 93, 085101 (2016)

    2016

  27. [35]

    Coleman, A

    P. Coleman, A. Panigrahy, and A. M. Tsvelik, A solv- able 3d kondo lattice exhibiting odd-frequency pairing and order fractionalization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 177601 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    Affleck and A

    I. Affleck and A. W. W. Ludwig, Exact conformal- 9 field-theory results on the multichannel kondo effect: Single-fermion green’s function, self-energy, and resistiv- ity, Phys. Rev. B 48, 7297 (1993)

    1993

  29. [37]

    Ishii, H

    I. Ishii, H. Muneshige, S. Kamikawa, T. K. Fujita, T. On- imaru, N. Nagasawa, T. Takabatake, T. Suzuki, G. Ano, M. Akatsu, Y. Nemoto, and T. Goto, Antiferroquadrupo- lar ordering and magnetic-field-induced phase transi- tion in the cage compound prrh 2zn20, Phys. Rev. B 87, 20...

    2013

  30. [38]

    Inui and Y

    K. Inui and Y. Motome, Channel-selective non-fermi liq- uid behavior in the two-channel kondo lattice model un- der a magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B 102, 155126 (2020)

    2020

  31. [39]

    Hoshino, J

    S. Hoshino, J. Otsuki, and Y. Kuramoto, Resolution of entropy ln √ 2 by ordering in two-channel kondo lat- tice, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 82, 044707 (2013), https://doi.org/10.7566/JPSJ.82.044707

    2013 doi

  32. [40]

    Ge and Y

    Y. Ge and Y. Komijani, Emergent spinon dispersion and symmetry breaking in two-channel kondo lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 077202 (2022)

    2022

  33. [41]

    Tanaskovi´ c, K

    D. Tanaskovi´ c, K. Haule, G. Kotliar, and V. Dobrosavl- jevi´ c, Phase diagram, energy scales, and nonlocal corre- lations in the anderson lattice model, Phys. Rev. B 84, 115105 (2011)

    2011

  34. [42]

    Haule and G

    K. Haule and G. Kotliar, Strongly correlated super- conductivity: A plaquette dynamical mean-field theory study, Phys. Rev. B 76, 104509 (2007)

    2007

  35. [43]

    Sordi, K

    G. Sordi, K. Haule, and A.-M. S. Tremblay, Mott physics and first-order transition between two metals in the normal-state phase diagram of the two-dimensional hub- bard model, Phys. Rev. B 84, 075161 (2011)

    2011

  36. [44]

    Gleis, S.-S

    A. Gleis, S.-S. B. Lee, G. Kotliar, and J. von Delft, Emer- gent properties of the periodic anderson model: A high- resolution, real-frequency study of heavy-fermion quan- tum criticality, Phys. Rev. X 14, 041036 (2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    Yao and D.-H

    H. Yao and D.-H. Lee, Fermionic magnons. non-abelian spinons, and the spin quantum hall effect from an ex- actly solvable spin-1/2 kitaev model with su(2) symme- try, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 087205 (2011)

    2011

  38. [46]

    A. M. Tsvelick and P. Wiegmann, Exact solution of the multichannel kondo problem, scaling, and integrability, J. Stat. Phys. 38, 125 (1985)

    1985

  39. [47]

    M. H. Hettler, A. N. Tahvildar-Zadeh, M. Jarrell, T. Pr- uschke, and H. R. Krishnamurthy, Nonlocal dynami- cal correlations of strongly interacting electron systems, Phys. Rev. B 58, R7475 (1998)

    1998

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.