Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Signatures of modified gravity from the gravitational Aharonov-Bohm effect

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that the gravitational Aharonov-Bohm effect can expose the extra vector graviton of Kaluza-Klein gravity through meV-scale energy splittings in orbiting atomic and nuclear systems.

desk verdict Straightforward KK/Yukawa extension of the gravitational AB calculation, but the claimed new quantum number is an expansion artifact and the meV/eV numbers are common-mode shifts. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.07613 v2 pith:LZWQR2DS submitted 2025-02-11 gr-qc astro-ph.HEhep-th

Kimet Jusufi , Abdelrahman Yasser , Emmanuele Battista , Nader Inan This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qcastro-ph.HEhep-th PACS 04.50.Kd03.65.Vf
keywords gravitationalAharonov-BohmeffectKaluza-KleingravitymodifiedYukawapotentialmassivegravitonenergy-levelsplittingdarkmatteralternativesatomicinterferometry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes that the gravitational Aharonov-Bohm effect can serve as a test of modified gravity, specifically Kaluza-Klein theory, without assuming dark matter particles. In Kaluza-Klein gravity, the ordinary Newtonian potential is joined by a Yukawa-type repulsive term from a massive spin-1 graviton, so a quantum system on an eccentric orbit around Earth accumulates extra gravitational phase. Solving the resulting time-dependent Schrödinger problem, the authors find that each energy level splits into sidebands labelled by integers $n$ and $k$, with the $k$-sidebands absent in general relativity. For atomic systems the shift relative to general relativity reaches about a tenth of a milli-electronvolt, and for nuclear systems about a third of an electronvolt, for galaxy-scale graviton masses. The central claim is that this splitting is a signature of the extra vector gravitational degrees of freedom in modified gravity.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the time-dependent gravitational phase $\varphi_g(t) = \frac{m}{\hbar}\int_0^t \Phi_g(t')\,dt'$, built from the combined Newtonian-plus-Yukawa potential of Kaluza-Klein gravity, evaluated on a slightly eccentric orbit $r(t) = A + B\cos(\Omega t)$. The phase is split into a linear-in-time part that shifts the base energy and a sinusoidal part that, through the Jacobi-Anger expansion, becomes an infinite sum of Bessel-function sidebands at multiples of the orbital frequency $\Omega$ and its harmonic $2\Omega$. This expansion converts the Aharonov-Bohm phase into the energy-level multiplet of Eq. (3.30), where the new quantum number $k$ encodes the extra vector-graviton interaction.

What would settle it

A differential clock experiment comparing an atomic or nuclear transition on an eccentric satellite orbit with a ground clock should show a constant energy offset set by $\alpha$ and $\alpha_B$ together with a periodic modulation at the orbital frequency and its first harmonic; a null result bounding the offset below about $0.1$ meV for $m_g \sim 10^{-62}$ kg and $\alpha \sim 0.5$ would rule out the Kaluza-Klein vector-graviton contribution as modelled.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In Kaluza-Klein gravity, the gravitational potential around a spherical body is $\Phi_{\rm tot}(r) = -\frac{G_N M}{r}\left[1 + \alpha - \alpha_B e^{-r/\lambda}\right]$, adding a repulsive Yukawa term from a massive spin-1 graviton to the Newtonian term. Taking a quantum system on an almost-circular orbit with radius $r(t) = A + B\cos(\Omega t)$, the paper derives the gravitational Aharonov-Bohm phase $\varphi_g(t) = -\frac{m}{\hbar}\int \Phi_{\rm tot}\, dt$ and solves the time-dependent Schrödinger equation. The central result is Eq. (3.30): each unperturbed level $E_i$ splits into $E_i^{(n)} = E_i + \frac{G_N M m}{A}\left[1 + \hat{\alpha} + \frac{\alpha_B A}{\lambda} - \frac{\alpha_B B^2}{2A\lambda}\right] \pm (n+2k)\hbar\Omega$, where $n$ labels the usual general-relativity sidebands and the new integer $k$ arises from the vector-graviton coupling. The $k$-term enters through the second harmonic $\Xi = 2\Omega$ generated by the orbital eccentricity, and the $k=0$ part gives energy shifts of order meV for atomic systems and eV for nuclear systems when the graviton mass is at the galaxy-scale value around $10^{-62}\,$kg.

Load-bearing premise

The calculation assumes the spin-1 graviton's gravitational charge $q_g$ equals the inertial mass $m$ of the quantum system, so the Yukawa force couples with full strength; if the vector graviton couples with a different strength, every quoted energy shift and phase scales by that unknown factor.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A satellite-borne atomic clock on an eccentric orbit would see each atomic or nuclear level split into sidebands spaced by $\hbar\Omega$, with an additional $k$-multiplet that general relativity does not predict.
  • The difference from general relativity reaches roughly $0.1$ meV for electron-mass systems and $0.3$ eV for neutron-mass systems at galaxy-scale graviton masses, placing the effect within reach of high-precision spectroscopy and future space-mission clock comparisons.
  • The accumulated phase difference over one orbital period reaches $|\Delta\varphi_g| \sim 10^{15}$ rad for the quoted parameters, which would imprint periodic modulations in matter-wave interferometry and clock-comparison signals.
  • Generic modified-gravity models with attractive Yukawa corrections, such as $f(R)$, bimetric, and Horndeski theories, produce the same sideband structure but with a sign flip in the higher-order $k$-terms, so the same experiment can distinguish a repulsive vector graviton from an attractive scalar graviton.
  • For a graviton mass near $10^{-62}$ kg, the model predicts a minimum gravitational-wave frequency near $10^{-12}$ Hz, and near $10^{-9}$ Hz for $10^{-59}$ kg, linking the effect to pulsar-timing-array observations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension follows from the structure of Eq. (3.30): because the new quantum number $k$ enters through the $2\Omega$ harmonic, an eccentric-orbit clock experiment can isolate the vector-graviton signal by locking onto the twice-orbital-frequency component, where the standard $n$-sidebands of general relativity do not interfere.
  • The equality $q_g = m$ is the scaling that fixes every quoted number; if the spin-1 graviton couples with a strength smaller than inertial mass, the meV and eV shifts shrink by that factor, so a null experiment should be read as a bound on the coupling $\alpha_B$ rather than a falsification of the whole Kaluza-Klein dark-matter mechanism.
  • The same derivation applies to any time-dependent scalar or vector field that modulates the effective gravitational potential, so the sideband spacing $\Omega$ can act as a spectrometer for ultralight fields, with the $2\Omega$ harmonic revealing the quadratic nonlinearity of the coupling.
  • Comparing two clocks at different orbital radii would cancel the general-relativistic background and isolate the Yukawa contribution, a differential design the paper gestures at but does not work out in detail.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes the gravitational Aharonov-Bohm phase for a quantum system (atomic or nuclear) in an eccentric orbit around a massive body, replacing the Newtonian potential with the Kaluza-Klein-motivated potential Φtot = -(G_N M/r)(1+α-α_B e^{-r/λ}). It derives the resulting phase, solves the Schrödinger equation with a time-dependent potential, and obtains energy levels E_i^(n) = E_i + (G_N M m/A)[1+αhat+α_B A/λ-α_B B^2/(2Aλ)] ± (n+2k)ℏΩ, claiming that the 2kℏΩ structure is a new quantum number arising from the spin-1 graviton. The paper reports meV-scale (atomic) and eV-scale (nuclear) energy shifts, computes phase shifts, and extends the calculation to generic Yukawa-type modified gravity models.

Significance. The paper is clearly organized, and the algebraic reduction up to Eq. (3.30) is presented in detail; the GR limit in Eq. (3.31) correctly recovers the earlier result of Ref. [7]. If a genuinely KK-specific sideband structure existed, the proposed atomic-clock and atom-interferometry tests would be an interesting route to probing modified gravity. However, the central claims are not supported by the derivation: the 2Ω sidebands are an expansion-order artifact present already in GR, the headline meV/eV numbers are common-mode static shifts rather than splittings, and the vector-graviton coupling is fixed by an unjustified identification q_g = m. The physical significance claimed in the abstract therefore is not established.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3, Eqs. (3.12)-(3.16)] The 2Ω term that produces the k sidebands is an artifact of inconsistent truncation. Eq. (3.12) expands 1/r only to first order in B/A, but Eq. (3.13) then retains the product (B/A)(B/λ) cos^2(Ωt) from expanding the Yukawa exponential to first order in 1/λ. A consistent expansion of the pure-GR potential to the same order in 1/r gives Φ_GR = -(G_N M/A)[1 - (B/A)cos(Ωt) + (B/A)^2 cos^2(Ωt) + ...], which already produces a phase factor exp[-i G_N M m B^2/(4ℏ A^3 Ω) sin(2Ωt)]. Thus the ±2kℏΩ multiplet in Eq. (3.30) is a harmonic index of an eccentric orbit in GR, not a new quantum number tied to the spin-1 graviton. For the quoted LEO parameters, the neglected (B/A)^2 term is numerically much larger than the retained (B/A)(B/λ) term, so the claimed KK signature is not even the leading correction at this order.
  2. [§4, Eqs. (4.2)-(4.4) and Tables 1-2] The meV/eV values advertised in the abstract are k=0 common-mode energy shifts, not splittings. Eq. (4.2) with k=0 gives the static shift G_N M m/A [αhat + α_B A/λ - α_B B^2/(2Aλ)], which is the only part evaluated in Tables 1 and 2. The actual sideband spacing in Eq. (3.30) is ℏΩ; for the low-Earth orbit parameters used in the paper (T ≈ 5400 s, Ω ≈ 1.16×10^-3 rad/s), ℏΩ ≈ 7.7×10^-19 eV. The abstract's statement that the 'energy splitting difference' is of order meV/eV therefore misrepresents the content of Eq. (4.2).
  3. [§3, after Eq. (3.5)] The identification q_g = m via the Equivalence Principle is not justified for the spin-1 KK field. The equivalence principle constrains the universal coupling of the massless spin-2 graviton to mass-energy; the vector field in Kaluza-Klein theory couples to the Kaluza-Klein charge, whose value is not determined by inertial mass. Since the vector contribution to the phase in Eq. (3.6) is linear in q_g, all numerical estimates of the Yukawa-induced effect are proportional to an unconstrained coupling, and the results would change by an untracked factor if q_g ≠ m.
  4. [§4, Eqs. (4.3)-(4.4)] The numerical 'predictions' are not independent constraints. The energy shifts in Eqs. (4.3) and (4.4) are linear in αhat and mhat_g = α_B m_g, and the adopted values (e.g., αhat = 0.5, mhat_g = 10^-62 kg) are taken from earlier fits in Refs. [40,47] rather than derived or constrained in this paper. The calculation evaluates a formula at assumed parameter values; it does not, by itself, predict or test those values.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§3, Eq. (3.8)] There is a sign inconsistency between Eq. (3.6) and Eq. (3.8): the term - (m/ℏ) ∫ A_μ dx^μ with A_0 = Φ_YU in Eq. (3.6) gives - (m/ℏ) ∫ Φ_YU dt, but Eq. (3.8) writes the Yukawa contribution with a plus sign. The final expression in Eq. (3.10) uses the correct total-potential sign, but the intermediate step should be fixed.
  2. [§5, Eqs. (5.4)-(5.5)] The replacement rule between the KK and generic-Yukawa results is stated inconsistently: Eq. (5.4) uses α in the first term, while Eq. (5.5) uses αhat, although both are said to follow from replacing α → αhat. Please make the notation uniform.
  3. [§3, Eq. (3.30)] The notation in Eq. (3.30) writes ±(n+2k)ℏΩ without specifying the ranges or selection rules for n and k; since both sums in Eq. (3.29) run over all integers, the level structure and degeneracy should be stated more precisely.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The claimed spin-1-graviton quantum number is the ordinary 2Ω orbital harmonic relabeled, and the meV/eV 'splitting' is an evaluation of the formula at imported fitted parameter values.

  1. renaming known result [Sec. 3, Eqs. (3.27)–(3.31), paragraph after Eq. (3.30)]
    "We thus find from Eq. (3.30) that the energy levels are indeed corrected due to the modification of the law of gravity. Indeed, unlike in GR, an additional energy splitting is induced by the parameters ˆα and αB. Furthermore, we identify another correction term proportional to ℏΩ. This splitting term is associated with new quantum numbers stemming from the interaction between baryonic matter and the spin-1 graviton, which introduces extra angular momentum states."

    The k-multiplet in Eq. (3.30) comes from the second exponential in Eq. (3.27), exp[−i G_N M m B^2 α_B/(4ℏA^2Ωλ) sin(2Ωt)], which the paper obtains from the identity 2 sinΩt cosΩt = sin2Ωt. That cosΩt factor originates in Eq. (3.13) from expanding e^{−(A+B cosΩt)/λ} to first order while Eq. (3.12) truncates 1/r at first order in B/A. Expanding the pure GR potential to the same second order gives Φ_GR = −(G_N M/A)(1 − β cosΩt + β^2 cos^2Ωt + ...), which produces the identical sin(2Ωt) sideband with coefficient G_N M m B^2/(4ℏA^3Ω).

  2. fitted input called prediction [Sec. 4, Eqs. (4.2)–(4.3), paragraph after Table 1; abstract and Sec. 6]
    "The typical graviton mass in galaxy scales is expected to be ˆmg „ 10−62 kg and the energy shift for electron is of the order ∆E(n)i „ 0.16 meV for specific value ˆα “ 0.5. It is remarkable that our model is able to reproduce these expected results."

    Equation (4.2) defines ΔE_i^(n) = G_N M m/A [α̂ + α_B A/λ − α_B B^2/(2Aλ)] ± 2kℏΩ, and Eq. (4.3) sets k = 0 to get ΔE = 0.332×10^−3 α̂ + 6.437×10^45 m̂_g eV. The abstract's headline numbers (meV for an atomic system, eV for a nuclear system) are obtained by inserting α̂ = 0.5 and m̂_g = 10^−62 kg, values imported from earlier Yukawa/KK fits by overlapping authors (Refs. [40,47]), not derived or constrained by the AB calculation in this paper. The paper even states that it 'reproduce[s] these expected results,' so the numerical prediction reduces to the assumed input parameters. In addition, k = 0 makes the quoted quantity a common-mode energy shift, not the level splitting advertised in the abstract.

full rationale

The AB phase calculation itself is not circular relative to the assumed KK potential: Eqs. (3.10)–(3.30) follow algebraically from the Yukawa-plus-Newtonian ansatz, and the self-citations to Refs. [40,47] supply the model and parameter values rather than a tautological uniqueness argument. However, the two central claims are not independent derivations. The 'new quantum number' k is the 2Ω harmonic of the eccentric orbit, which already appears in GR when 1/r is expanded to the same order used for the Yukawa exponential; the paper's 'unlike in GR' statement is an artifact of the inconsistent truncation. The meV/eV energy numbers are evaluations of Eq. (4.3) at imported fitted values α̂ = 0.5 and m̂_g = 10^−62 kg, so the numerical prediction reduces by construction to those inputs. This is partial circularity in the headline results, while the algebraic phase formula retains independent content conditional on the model.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central predictions rest on a phenomenological KK potential with free parameters alpha_hat, alpha_B, and m_g from prior fits by overlapping authors, on the scalar AB phase formula of Ref. [7], and on the assumption m = q_g for the vector graviton. No new entity is introduced by this paper, but the adopted spin-1 graviton lacks independent evidence.

free parameters (4)
  • alpha_hat = 0.5 (illustrative, from prior cosmology fits)
    Dimensionless correction to Newton's constant in the KK potential; the dominant meV/eV energy shift is linear in alpha_hat.
  • alpha_B = implicit in alpha_hat = alpha - alpha_B, from Refs. [40,47]
    Spin-1 graviton coupling in the Yukawa potential; controls the sign and size of the Yukawa term.
  • m_g (graviton mass) = about 10^-62 kg for galaxy scales; smaller values in tables
    Sets the Yukawa range lambda; enters energy shifts and phase via mhat_g = alpha_B m_g. Taken from galactic rotation fits, not derived here.
  • m (mass of the quantum system) = 9.1e-31 kg (electron) for atomic system; 1.67e-27 kg (neutron) for nuclear system
    The predicted static energy shift is proportional to m; using electron mass for an atomic system is a modeling choice that is not justified.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The total KK gravitational potential is Phi_tot(r) = -G_N M/r (1 + alpha - alpha_B e^{-r/lambda}).
    Adopted from Ref. [40] without re-derivation; all phase and energy results are built on this potential.
  • domain assumption The gravitational AB phase is phi_g = (m/hbar) integral Phi_g dt.
    Taken from Ref. [7] as the starting point of the calculation and applied to the new potential.
  • ad hoc to paper The Equivalence Principle holds for the vector graviton, so m = q_g.
    Assumed in Sec. 3 to fix the size of the vector contribution. The authors note this is not guaranteed in KK gravity.
  • domain assumption Weak-field linearization is valid and the Ricci-tensor term in the Proca equation is negligible.
    Used in Secs. 2 and 3, Eqs. (2.7) and (3.3)-(3.6); restricts validity to weak gravity, which is appropriate for a low-Earth orbit.
  • domain assumption The orbit is r(t)=A+B cos(Omega t) with A >> B, with selected truncation orders.
    Used in Eqs. (3.11)-(3.14); the asymmetric truncation of 1/r and the exponential creates the apparent 2Omega sideband.
invented entities (1)
  • Massive spin-1 dark graviton from the KK model
    purpose: Mediates the repulsive Yukawa force that adds the extra AB phase and energy corrections
    Postulated in Ref. [40] and adopted here. No direct detection exists; the paper adds no new falsifiable handle beyond galactic rotation fits and a speculative gravitational-wave frequency.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Signatures of modified gravity from the gravitational Aharonov-Bohm effect." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LZWQR2DS

@misc{pith2026250207613,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Signatures of modified gravity from the gravitational Aharonov-Bohm effect},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LZWQR2DS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.07613}
}
read the original abstract

To date, no observational confirmation of dark matter particles has been found. In this paper, we put forward an alternative approach to inferring evidence for dark matter through modified gravity, without invoking fundamental dark matter particles. Specifically, we explore the possibility of extracting signatures of Kaluza-Klein gravity through the gravitational Aharonov-Bohm effect. Kaluza-Klein theory has recently been proposed as an alternative to the dark sector, and predicts a tower of particles, including spin-0 and spin-1 gravitons alongside the usual spin-2 gravitons, which can gravitationally couple to matter. We thus analyze a quantum system in free fall around a gravitating body in the presence of a modified Yukawa-like gravitational potential, and determine the gravitational phase induced by the additional degrees of freedom introduced by the Kaluza-Klein model. Our results reveal that, in addition to the usual result from General Relativity, the quantum wave function of the system exhibits an additional effect: a splitting of the energy levels with a new quantum number due to the extra vector gravitational degrees of freedom. The energy splitting difference between general relativity and Kaluza-Klein gravity is found to be of the order of meV for an atomic system and eV for a nuclear system. Similar values also arise in generic modified gravity models and can be feasibly tested in the future. Numerical estimates for the graviton mass are also provided, and potential imprints on gravitational waves are mentioned.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Effective matter sectors from modified entropies

    gr-qc 2025-11 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Choosing a modified entropy S(r) fixes a metric f(r)=1-4πM/S'(r), and the Einstein tensor of that metric acts as an anisotropic effective fluid.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [7]

    Chiao, N.A

    R.Y. Chiao, N.A. Inan, M. Scheibner, J. Sharping, D.A. Singleton and M.E. Tobar,Gravitational Aharonov-Bohm effect, Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 064073 [2311.07764]

    arXiv 2024

  2. [1]

    Aharonov and D

    Y. Aharonov and D. Bohm,Significance of electromagnetic potentials in the quantum theory, Phys. Rev. 115 (1959) 485

    work page 1959

  3. [2]

    Ryder,Quantum Field Theory, Cambridge University Press (6, 1996), 10.1017/CBO9780511813900

    L.H. Ryder,Quantum Field Theory, Cambridge University Press (6, 1996), 10.1017/CBO9780511813900

    doi:10.1017/cbo9780511813900 1996

  4. [3]

    Chambers,Shift of an electron interference pattern by enclosed magnetic flux, Phys

    R.G. Chambers,Shift of an electron interference pattern by enclosed magnetic flux, Phys. Rev. Lett. 5 (1960) 3

    work page 1960

  5. [4]

    Batelaan and A

    H. Batelaan and A. Tonomura,The Aharonov-Bohm effects: Variations on a subtle theme, Phys. Today 62N9 (2009) 38

    work page 2009

  6. [5]

    Gillot, S

    J. Gillot, S. Lepoutre, A. Gauguet, M. Büchner and J. Vigué,Measurement of the he-mckellar-wilkens topological phase by atom interferometry and test of its independence with atom velocity, Phys. Rev. Lett.111 (2013) 030401

    work page 2013

  7. [6]

    Overstreet, P

    C. Overstreet, P. Asenbaum, J. Curti, M. Kim and M.A. Kasevich,Observation of a gravitational Aharonov-Bohm effect, Science 375 (2021) abl7152

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Energy level shift of quantum systems via the electric Aharonov-Bohm effect

    R.Y. Chiao, H. Hart, N.A. Inan, M. Scheibner, J. Sharping, D.A. Singleton et al.,Energy-level shift of quantum systems via the scalar electric Aharonov-Bohm effect, Phys. Rev. A107 (2023) 042209 [2212.03437]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

Show all 63 references
  1. [9]

    Voisin, I

    G. Voisin, I. Cognard, P.C.C. Freire, N. Wex, L. Guillemot, G. Desvignes et al.,An improved test of the strong equivalence principle with the pulsar in a triple star system, Astron. Astrophys.638 (2020) A24 [2005.01388]

    2020 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Will,The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment, Living Rev

    C.M. Will,The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment, Living Rev. Rel.17 (2014) 4 [1403.7377]

    2014 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Wex,Testing Relativistic Gravity with Radio Pulsars, 1402.5594

    N. Wex,Testing Relativistic Gravity with Radio Pulsars, 1402.5594

    arXiv

  4. [12]

    Weisberg and J.H

    J.M. Weisberg and J.H. Taylor,Relativistic binary pulsar B1913+16: Thirty years of observations and analysis, ASP Conf. Ser.328 (2005) 25 [astro-ph/0407149]

    2005 arXiv

  5. [13]

    Trestini,Quasi-Keplerian parametrization for eccentric compact binaries in scalar-tensor theories at second post-Newtonian order and applications, Phys

    D. Trestini,Quasi-Keplerian parametrization for eccentric compact binaries in scalar-tensor theories at second post-Newtonian order and applications, Phys. Rev. D109 (2024) 104003 [2401.06844]

    2024 arXiv

  6. [14]

    De Falco, E

    V. De Falco, E. Battista, D. Usseglio and S. Capozziello,Radiative losses and radiation-reaction effects at the first post-Newtonian order in Einstein–Cartan theory, Eur. Phys. J. C84 (2024) 137 [2401.13374]

    2024 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Diedrichs, D

    R.F. Diedrichs, D. Schmitt and L. Sagunski,Binary systems in massive scalar-tensor theories: Next-to-leading order gravitational wave phase from effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D110 (2024) 104073 [2311.04274]

    2024 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Bernard, L

    L. Bernard, L. Blanchet and D. Trestini,Gravitational waves in scalar-tensor theory to one-and-a-half post-Newtonian order, JCAP 08 (2022) 008 [2201.10924]. – 16 –

    2022 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Shiralilou, T

    B. Shiralilou, T. Hinderer, S.M. Nissanke, N. Ortiz and H. Witek,Post-Newtonian gravitational and scalar waves in scalar-Gauss–Bonnet gravity, Class. Quant. Grav.39 (2022) 035002 [2105.13972]

    2022 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Battista and V

    E. Battista and V. De Falco,First post-Newtonian generation of gravitational waves in Einstein-Cartan theory, Phys. Rev. D104 (2021) 084067 [2109.01384]

    2021 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Blanchet,Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves, Living Rev

    L. Blanchet,Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves, Living Rev. Rel.17 (2014) 2 [1310.1528]

    2014 arXiv

  12. [20]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgocollaboration, Tests of general relativity with GW150914, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116 (2016) 221101 [1602.03841]

    2016 arXiv

  13. [21]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgocollaboration, Tests of General Relativity with GW170817, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019) 011102 [1811.00364]

    2019 arXiv

  14. [22]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgocollaboration, Tests of General Relativity with the Binary Black Hole Signals from the LIGO-Virgo Catalog GWTC-1, Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) 104036 [1903.04467]

    2019 arXiv

  15. [23]

    LIGO Scientific, Virgocollaboration, Tests of general relativity with binary black holes from the second LIGO-Virgo gravitational-wave transient catalog, Phys. Rev. D103 (2021) 122002 [2010.14529]

    2021 arXiv

  16. [24]

    LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRAcollaboration, Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3, 2112.06861

    arXiv

  17. [25]

    LIGO Scientific–Virgo–Kagracollaboration, Summary of Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3, in56th Rencontres de Moriond on Gravitation, 4, 2022 [2204.00662]

    2022 arXiv

  18. [26]

    Event Horizon Telescopecollaboration, Gravitational Test Beyond the First Post-Newtonian Order with the Shadow of the M87 Black Hole, Phys. Rev. Lett.125 (2020) 141104 [2010.01055]

    2020 arXiv

  19. [27]

    Event Horizon Telescopecollaboration, First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VIII. Magnetic Field Structure near The Event Horizon, Astrophys. J. Lett.910 (2021) L13 [2105.01173]

    2021 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Event Horizon Telescopecollaboration, First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way, Astrophys. J. Lett. 930 (2022) L12

    2022

  21. [29]

    Vagnozzi et al.,Horizon-scale tests of gravity theories and fundamental physics from the Event Horizon Telescope image of Sagittarius A, Class

    S. Vagnozzi et al.,Horizon-scale tests of gravity theories and fundamental physics from the Event Horizon Telescope image of Sagittarius A, Class. Quant. Grav.40 (2023) 165007 [2205.07787]

    2023 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Bambi, K

    C. Bambi, K. Freese, S. Vagnozzi and L. Visinelli,Testing the rotational nature of the supermassive object M87* from the circularity and size of its first image, Phys. Rev. D100 (2019) 044057 [1904.12983]

    2019 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Cunha, C.A.R

    P.V.P. Cunha, C.A.R. Herdeiro and E. Radu,EHT constraint on the ultralight scalar hair of the M87 supermassive black hole, Universe 5 (2019) 220 [1909.08039]

    2019 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Kramer et al.,Strong-Field Gravity Tests with the Double Pulsar, Phys

    M. Kramer et al.,Strong-Field Gravity Tests with the Double Pulsar, Phys. Rev. X 11 (2021) 041050 [2112.06795]

    2021

  25. [33]

    Copeland, M

    E.J. Copeland, M. Sami and S. Tsujikawa,Dynamics of dark energy, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D15 (2006) 1753 [hep-th/0603057]

    2006 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Bertone and D

    G. Bertone and D. Hooper,History of dark matter, Rev. Mod. Phys.90 (2018) 045002 [1605.04909]

    2018 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Salucci et al.,Einstein, Planck and Vera Rubin: Relevant Encounters Between the Cosmological and the Quantum Worlds, Front

    P. Salucci et al.,Einstein, Planck and Vera Rubin: Relevant Encounters Between the Cosmological and the Quantum Worlds, Front. in Phys.8 (2021) 603190 [2011.09278]. – 17 –

    2021 arXiv

  28. [36]

    McGaugh, J.M

    S.S. McGaugh, J.M. Schombert, F. Lelli and J. Franck,Accelerated Structure Formation: The Early Emergence of Massive Galaxies and Clusters of Galaxies, Astrophys. J. 976 (2024) 13 [2406.17930]

    2024 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Nojiri and S.D

    S. Nojiri and S.D. Odintsov,Unified cosmic history in modified gravity: from F(R) theory to Lorentz non-invariant models, Phys. Rept. 505 (2011) 59 [1011.0544]

    2011 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Capozziello and M

    S. Capozziello and M. De Laurentis,Extended Theories of Gravity, Phys. Rept. 509 (2011) 167 [1108.6266]

    2011 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Clifton, P.G

    T. Clifton, P.G. Ferreira, A. Padilla and C. Skordis,Modified Gravity and Cosmology, Phys. Rept. 513 (2012) 1 [1106.2476]

    2012 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Jusufi, G.G

    K. Jusufi, G.G. Luciano, A. Sheykhi and D. Samart,Dark Universe inspired by the Kaluza-Klein gravity and impact on primordial gravitational waves, JHEAp 47 (2025) 100373 [2411.14176]

    2025 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Moffat,Scalar-tensor-vector gravity theory, JCAP 03 (2006) 004 [gr-qc/0506021]

    J.W. Moffat,Scalar-tensor-vector gravity theory, JCAP 03 (2006) 004 [gr-qc/0506021]

    2006 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Aoki and S

    K. Aoki and S. Mukohyama,Massive gravitons as dark matter and gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 024001 [1604.06704]

    2016 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Amendola, D

    L. Amendola, D. Bettoni, A.M. Pinho and S. Casas,Measuring gravity at cosmological scales, Universe 6 (2020) 20 [1902.06978]

    2020 arXiv

  36. [44]

    Jusufi, G

    K. Jusufi, G. Leon and A.D. Millano,Dark Universe phenomenology from Yukawa potential?, Phys. Dark Univ.42 (2023) 101318 [2304.11492]

    2023 arXiv

  37. [45]

    Jusufi, E

    K. Jusufi, E. González and G. Leon,Addressing the Hubble tension in Yukawa cosmology?, Phys. Dark Univ. 46 (2024) 101584 [2402.02512]

    2024 arXiv

  38. [46]

    González, K

    E. González, K. Jusufi, G. Leon and E.N. Saridakis,Observational constraints on Yukawa cosmology and connection with black hole shadows, Phys. Dark Univ.42 (2023) 101304 [2305.14305]

    2023 arXiv

  39. [47]

    D’Agostino, K

    R. D’Agostino, K. Jusufi and S. Capozziello,Testing Yukawa cosmology at the Milky Way and M31 galactic scales, Eur. Phys. J. C84 (2024) 386 [2404.01846]

    2024 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Inan, A.F

    N. Inan, A.F. Ali, K. Jusufi and A. Yasser,Graviton mass due to dark energy as a superconducting medium-theoretical and phenomenological aspects, JCAP 08 (2024) 012 [2404.03872]

    2024 arXiv

  41. [49]

    Jusufi, A

    K. Jusufi, A. Farag Ali, A.Y. Abdelrahman, N. Inan and A.Y. Ellithi,Modified gravity/entropic gravity correspondence due to graviton mass, Annals Phys. 468 (2024) 169717 [2405.05269]

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    Hlozek, D

    R. Hlozek, D. Grin, D.J.E. Marsh and P.G. Ferreira,A Search for Ultralight Axions Using Precision Cosmological Data, Phys. Rev. D91 (2015) 103512 [1410.2896]

    2015 arXiv

  43. [51]

    S. Nair, A. Vijaykumar and S. Sarkar,Bounds on the charge of the graviton using gravitational wave observations, JCAP 11 (2024) 004 [2405.05038]

    2024 arXiv

  44. [52]

    Stodolsky,Matter and light wave interferometry in gravitational fields, General Relativity and Gravitation 11 (1979) 391

    L. Stodolsky,Matter and light wave interferometry in gravitational fields, General Relativity and Gravitation 11 (1979) 391

    1979

  45. [53]

    Ponce de Leon,The Equivalence principle in Kaluza-Klein gravity, Int

    J. Ponce de Leon,The Equivalence principle in Kaluza-Klein gravity, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D18 (2009) 251 [gr-qc/0703094]

    2009 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Overduin,Solar system tests of the equivalence principle and constraints on higher-dimensional gravity, Phys

    J.M. Overduin,Solar system tests of the equivalence principle and constraints on higher-dimensional gravity, Phys. Rev. D62 (2000) 102001 [gr-qc/0007047]

    2000 arXiv

  47. [55]

    A. Cuyt, F. Backeljauw, V. Petersen, C. Bonan-Hamada, B. Verdonk, H. Waadeland et al., Handbook of Continued Fractions for Special Functions, SpringerLink: Springer e-Books, Springer Netherlands (2008)

    2008

  48. [56]

    Aharonov and A

    Y. Aharonov and A. Casher,Topological quantum effects for neutral particles, Phys. Rev. Lett.53 (1984) 319. – 18 –

    1984

  49. [57]

    Ahlers and et al.,STE-QUEST: Space Time Explorer and QUantum Equivalence Principle Space Test, arXiv preprint(2022) [ 2211.15412]

    H. Ahlers and et al.,STE-QUEST: Space Time Explorer and QUantum Equivalence Principle Space Test, arXiv preprint(2022) [ 2211.15412]

    2022 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Cardoso, G.m.c

    V. Cardoso, G.m.c. Castro and A. Maselli,Gravitational waves in massive gravity theories: Waveforms, fluxes, and constraints from extreme-mass-ratio mergers, Phys. Rev. Lett.121 (2018) 251103

    2018

  51. [59]

    NANOGravcollaboration, The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background, Astrophys. J. Lett.951 (2023) L8 [2306.16213]

    2023 arXiv

  52. [60]

    Battista and V

    E. Battista and V. De Falco,Gravitational waves at the first post-Newtonian order with the Weyssenhoff fluid in Einstein–Cartan theory, Eur. Phys. J. C82 (2022) 628 [2206.12907]

    2022 arXiv

  53. [61]

    Battista and V

    E. Battista and V. De Falco,First post-Newtonian N-body problem in Einstein–Cartan theory with the Weyssenhoff fluid: equations of motion, Eur. Phys. J. C82 (2022) 782 [2208.09839]

    2022 arXiv

  54. [62]

    Battista, V

    E. Battista, V. De Falco and D. Usseglio,First post-Newtonian N-body problem in Einstein–Cartan theory with the Weyssenhoff fluid: Lagrangian and first integrals, Eur. Phys. J. C83 (2023) 112 [2301.08954]

    2023 arXiv

  55. [63]

    De Falco and E

    V. De Falco and E. Battista,Analytical results for binary dynamics at the first post-Newtonian order in Einstein-Cartan theory with the Weyssenhoff fluid, Phys. Rev. D108 (2023) 064032 [2309.00319]. – 19 –

    2023 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.