Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Correlations and Krylov spread for a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian: Ising chain with a complex-valued transverse magnetic field

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The Krylov spread of an all-down state evolving under a non-Hermitian Ising chain exposes three previously unnoticed dynamical phases in the gapped-imaginary-spectrum region, and ties the spread density to same-site spin correlations.

desk verdict Solid analytical work on non-Hermitian Ising correlations and Krylov spread, but the three-phase diagram rests on an unproven Krylov factorization that needs referee scrutiny. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.07775 v3 pith:P7OK7KXQ submitted 2025-02-11 quant-ph cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-el

E. Medina-Guerra , I. V. Gornyi , Yuval Gefen This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phcond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-el PACS 03.65.-w03.65.Yz05.30.-d75.10.Pq
keywords Krylovcomplexitynon-HermitianHamiltonianIsingchainexceptionalpointsspincorrelationfunctionsdynamicalphasetransitionsBogoliubovvacuumquantummany-bodydynamics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies the all-down state $|\downarrow\cdots\downarrow\rangle$ of an Ising chain with a complex transverse magnetic field, evolving under the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian $H=-\sum_i[J\sigma^x_i\sigma^x_{i+1}+(h+i\gamma/4)\sigma^z_i]$. It claims that Krylov spread, the mean position of the evolved state in the Krylov basis built from the initial state and the generator of the dynamics, reveals dynamical structure that static correlation functions miss. When the imaginary part of the spectrum is gapped, the state tends to the non-Hermitian Bogoliubov vacuum, and the way the spread density approaches its infinite-time value splits the gapped region into three dynamical phases with distinct characteristic times $t^\ast$. The paper also derives an exact link between the spread density and the same-site spin correlation, $C_\Omega=(1+\sqrt{1-C_{zz}(0)})/2$, and completes the analytic characterization of $C_{zz}(x)$ across the phase diagram. If true, this makes Krylov spread a cheap and general probe for dynamical phase structure in open and monitored many-body systems.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the $\mathfrak{su}(2)^{\otimes N}$ Lie-algebra structure of the Hamiltonian in the Jordan-Wigner representation: for each momentum mode the Hamiltonian is $2R_z(k)J_z(k)+R_x(k)(J_+(k)+J_-(k))$, so every mode is an independent two-level system. A normal-ordering decomposition of $\mathfrak{su}(2)$ yields the evolved state and the per-mode spread coefficient $A_+(k;t)$. The load-bearing identity is the thermodynamic-limit factorization of Krylov vectors, $|K_n\rangle=N_n\big(\sum_k\alpha_+(k)J_+(k)\big)^n|0\rangle$, which converts the spread into an integral over independent per-mode spreads and leads to $C_\Omega=(1+\sqrt{1-C_{zz}(0)})/2$. From there the paper decomposes the fidelity $F(t)$ into endpoint and bulk contributions, extracts the three characteristic times, and obtains the asymptotic correlation formulas by Darboux and regulator methods.

What would settle it

Numerically construct the exact Krylov basis for a finite chain at points in each predicted region (for example $h=0.5J$ with $\gamma=2J$, $\gamma=5J$, and $h=2J,\gamma=5J$, with $N$ up to about 20), compute the spread density $C(t)$ directly, and check whether the late-time fidelity decays with the predicted rates $\gamma$, $4|\Gamma(\bar k)|$, or $|\gamma_Y|$; a mismatch in any region would falsify the factorization underlying Eq. (102).

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that Krylov spread resolves a finer phase diagram than traditional correlation functions. For the Jordan-Wigner vacuum $|0\rangle=|\downarrow\cdots\downarrow\rangle$ evolved by the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian, the long-time state is the non-Hermitian Bogoliubov vacuum $|\Omega\rangle$ when $\mathrm{Im}\,\Lambda(k)$ is gapped, and a superposition $A(t)|\Omega\rangle+A^*(t)|q,-q\rangle$ when the spectrum is gapless at $k=\pm q$. The thermodynamic-limit spread density is $C(t)=\pi^{-1}\int_0^\pi dk\,|A_+(k;t)|^2/(1+|A_+(k;t)|^2)$, and its infinite-time value $C_\Omega$ is connected to the same-site correlation by $C_\Omega=(1+\sqrt{1-C_{zz}(0)})/2$. In the gapped phase the fidelity $F(t)=|C(t)-C_\Omega|$ is governed at long times by one of three rates: $\gamma$, $4|\Gamma(\bar k)|$, or $|\gamma_Y|$, where $\bar k$ is the slowest-decaying mode and $\gamma_Y$ is an effective decay built from the spectrum and its derivatives at a complex saddle point; these three rates define the paper's three new dynamical phases. The companion result is the full asymptotics of $C_{zz}(x)$: oscillatory exponential $x^{-3}e^{-x/\xi}$ in the gapped phase, oscillatory algebraic $x^{-2}\cos^2 qx$ in the gapless phase, and $x^{-4}\mu(x)$ on the critical line where two exceptional points appear.

Load-bearing premise

The whole calculation assumes that, in an infinite chain, the Krylov space built from the all-down state splits mode by mode, so the spread is an integral over independent two-level spreads; if the non-Hermitian evolution mixes momentum modes, the predicted spreads, the fidelity rates, and the three-phase diagram would not describe the actual Krylov spread.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In the gapped phase, the infinite-time Krylov spread density equals the spread obtained by unitary evolution from $|0\rangle$ to $|\Omega\rangle$, so the fidelity $F(t)$ measures how the non-Hermitian dynamics approach that unitary vacuum.
  • The spread density $C_\Omega$ undergoes a third-order phase transition across $\gamma=\gamma_c(h)$, with $\partial^2 C_\Omega/\partial h^2$ diverging as $(h_c-h)^{-1/2}$ from the left, so Krylov spread can locate the gapped-gapless boundary even where correlation functions are smooth.
  • In the gapless phase, the stationary state is $A(t)|\Omega\rangle+A^*(t)|q,-q\rangle$ with time-dependent coefficients, and the time-averaged spread density coincides with the unitary spread density.
  • The correlation asymptotics are now known across the whole phase diagram: oscillatory $x^{-3}e^{-x/\xi}$ in the gapped phase, $x^{-2}\cos^2 qx$ in the oscillatory gapless phase, and $x^{-4}\mu(x)$ on the critical line, with the change of power-law caused by two exceptional points.
  • The Krylov fidelity splits the gapped region into three subregions, and the boundaries of the subregions are marked by discontinuities in the derivatives of the characteristic time $t^\ast$ with respect to $h$ or $\gamma$.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the same fidelity construction could be applied to other non-Hermitian integrable chains, such as extended Kitaev or SSH models, where the per-mode factorization is expected to hold; measuring the late-time fidelity in those models would test the universality of the three-region picture.
  • Beyond the paper, the identity $C_\Omega=(1+\sqrt{1-C_{zz}(0)})/2$ suggests that Krylov spread can substitute for same-site correlation calculations in any model whose Krylov space is generated from a generalized coherent state, which would be worth testing in interacting or Floquet systems.
  • Beyond the paper, a direct experimental analogue would be to engineer the non-Hermitian Ising chain in a platform with controlled gain and loss and to extract the spread fidelity from time-resolved measurements of the state's projection onto the Krylov basis.
  • Beyond the paper, since the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian describes the no-click sector of a monitored system, the refined phase diagram should be inherited by quantum-trajectory dynamics; monitoring the spread fidelity under jumps would test that inheritance.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper studies the Krylov spread of the all-down state evolving under a non-Hermitian transverse-field Ising chain with complex field h+iγ/4. The authors diagonalize the Hamiltonian via a non-Hermitian Bogoliubov transformation, derive the time-evolved state, and analyze the static Czz correlation function in the non-Hermitian vacuum across the gapped and gapless regions of the imaginary spectrum. They then relate the infinite-time Krylov spread density to the same-site correlation function and define a Krylov spread fidelity F(t)=|C(t)-C_Ω| whose approach to zero, in the gapped region, yields three characteristic times and a refined three-phase diagram in the (h,γ) plane. The paper's main claims are: (i) Czz(x) decays as x^{-3}e^{-x/ξ} with oscillations in the gapped phase and algebraically as x^{-2} or x^{-4} with oscillations in the gapless phase; (ii) the spread density C_Ω has a third-order phase transition across γ=γc(h) and is related to Czz(0); and (iii) the time-dependent Krylov spread reveals three dynamical phases hidden in the gapped region.

Significance. If the central assumptions hold, the results are significant: they extend Krylov-spread techniques to a non-Hermitian many-body system, propose the spread fidelity as a probe of dynamical phases that are invisible to standard correlation functions, and provide a full asymptotic characterization of correlations in the non-Hermitian vacuum. The paper is analytic and largely self-contained, with detailed appendices for the stationary state, Darboux asymptotics, and the fidelity computation. The relation C_Ω=(1+√(1-Czz(0)))/2 is elegant, and the explicit elliptic-integral formula for the spread density in the Hermitian limit matches and extends Ref. [63]. However, the central time-dependent spread formula is imported from Ref. [63] without proof for the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian, and the paper itself acknowledges an unresolved prefactor mismatch on the gapped side of the critical curve; these issues affect the two headline claims.

major comments (3)
  1. [V.A, Eq. (102)] The thermodynamic-limit formula C(t)=π^{-1}∫dk |A_+(k;t)|²/(1+|A_+(k;t)|²) rests on the factorization in Eq. (90), imported from Ref. [63] for a Hermitian su(2)^N Hamiltonian. The present H in Eq. (28) contains the diagonal term 2R_z(k)J_z(k). Because J_z(k) acts non-trivially on multi-pair sectors and because H(k) also contains J_-(k), the vectors H^n|0⟩ are not obviously in the span of (∑_k α_+(k)J_+(k))^n|0⟩; no argument in Section V.A shows that the lower-pair contributions are negligible in the thermodynamic limit. Without a proof or a numerical check of Eq. (102) against the exact Krylov spread for finite N, the three dynamical phases in Fig. 4 and the rates in Eqs. (107)-(109) are not established.
  2. [Appendix D, after Eq. (D25)] The boundaries separating the three fidelity phases are not provided, with the stated reason that they solve multivariate polynomials of degree greater than 10. Because Fig. 4 is advertised as a key result, the reader cannot verify the phase diagram or reproduce the claimed regions from Eqs. (107)-(109) alone; please provide the implicit boundary equations, a numerical construction, or the explicit algorithm used to generate Fig. 4.
  3. [III.A, Eq. (70)] The paper acknowledges that as γ→γc(h)+ the Darboux method yields the correct algebraic powers but not the correct prefactors, which do not match the gapless-side result Eq. (79). This is a load-bearing gap for the claimed full analytical characterization of correlations across the phase diagram in the abstract. The manuscript should either provide a uniform asymptotic analysis connecting Eqs. (70) and (79) or state clearly the range of validity of the prefactor in Eq. (70).
minor comments (3)
  1. [III.C, text after Eq. (81)] The sentence referring to the oscillatory phase labels it (h > J, γ→0), but Eqs. (81) and Table I show the oscillatory x^{-2} behavior for h < J, γ→0; the inequality should be h < J.
  2. [Appendix D, Eq. (D16)] The function B(k) introduced before Eq. (D16) is described only as well-behaved and approaching zero faster than |X(k)| approaches infinity; a precise definition or bound would make the derivation of Eq. (D19) verifiable.
  3. [Fig. 4 caption] The caption says the white and red regions do not have an associated characteristic time, while the text names the three phases gray, green, and blue; unifying the color labels between the text and the figure would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the spread and correlation results are derived analytically from the Hamiltonian spectrum, with external-benchmark checks; the only cited transfer is a derivation gap, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper contains no parameter fitting to target data, no prediction that is statistically forced by a fitted input, and no load-bearing self-citation chain. The Krylov spread density in Eq. (92) is computed from the analytically diagonalized Hamiltonian (Eqs. (12)-(23) and (28)), and the relation C_Omega = (1 + sqrt(1 - Czz(0)))/2 in Eqs. (93)-(94) follows algebraically from the same-site fermion contraction in the non-Hermitian Bogoliubov vacuum, rather than being assumed as the correlation result. The asymptotic correlation laws in Eqs. (70), (78), (79), and (81) are derived using Darboux series and regulator methods from the explicit spectrum, and the Hermitian limits are checked against Refs. [10], [23], and [63]. The time-dependent spread in Eq. (102) is the basis of the three dynamical phases; it does rely on the Eq. (90) factorization of Krylov vectors, which is imported from the Hermitian Kitaev-chain argument of Ref. [63]. The paper states this transfer briefly: "Owing to the su(2) structure of H [see Eq. (28)], the Krylov vectors can be written in the thermodynamic limit as in Eq. (90) with Rx(k) instead of alpha_+(k)." For the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian, which contains a J_z term per mode, this factorization is asserted rather than re-derived, so the central claim is exposed to a potential failure of that assumption. However, this is an unproven or insufficiently justified imported step, not an instance of the target result being equivalent to the input by construction, and it is not a self-citation. No enumerated circular pattern is exhibited, so the honest finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central results rest on standard integrable-system tools plus the Krylov vector structure from Ref. [63]. No fitted parameters and no invented entities. The main non-standard input is the per-mode factorization of the Krylov spread.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The right vacuum |Omega> with Im Lambda(k) <= 0 is the physical ground state for the no-click non-Hermitian evolution.
    Sec. II.A-B. Standard biorthogonal non-Hermitian formalism, but it is a modeling choice that determines which stationary state is identified.
  • domain assumption In the thermodynamic limit, the n-th Krylov vector takes the form N_n (sum_k alpha_+(k) J_+(k))^n |0>, and the spread density factorizes into a momentum integral over independent per-mode two-level spreads.
    Sec. IV.B, Eq. (90). Invoked from Ref. [63] without derivation in this work. If false, Eqs. (92), (93), (102) and the three-phase claim would not describe the true Krylov spread.
  • standard math The asymptotic methods used (Darboux method, steepest descent, exponential regulators) give the correct leading behavior of the integrals as x -> infinity and t -> infinity.
    Sec. III and Appendices C-D. These are standard techniques, but they rely on analytic continuation and branch-cut assumptions that the paper partially acknowledges.
  • domain assumption The non-Hermitian evolution with state renormalization at each time, Eq. (7), is the effective dynamics of a monitored system between quantum jumps.
    Introduction, Eqs. (2)-(5). This is the standard no-click limit. The paper's results are about this model, and the open-system motivation inherits this assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Correlations and Krylov spread for a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian: Ising chain with a complex-valued transverse magnetic field." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/P7OK7KXQ

@misc{pith2026250207775,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Correlations and Krylov spread for a non-Hermitian Hamiltonian: Ising chain with a complex-valued transverse magnetic field},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/P7OK7KXQ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.07775}
}
read the original abstract

Krylov complexity measures the spread of an evolved state in a natural basis, induced by the generator of the dynamics and the initial state. Here, we study the spread in Hilbert space of the state of an Ising chain subject to a complex-valued transverse magnetic field, initialized in a trivial product state with all spins pointing down. We demonstrate that Krylov spread reveals structural features of many-body systems that remain hidden in correlation functions that are traditionally employed to determine the phase diagram. When the imaginary part of the spectrum of the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian is gapped, the system state asymptotically approaches the non-Hermitian Bogoliubov vacuum for this Hamiltonian. We find that the spread of this evolution unravels three different dynamical phases based on how the spread reaches its infinite-time value. Furthermore, we establish a connection between the Krylov spread and the static correlation function for the z-components of spins in the underlying non-Hermitian Bogoliubov vacuum, providing a full analytical characterization of correlations across the phase diagram. Specifically, for a gapped imaginary spectrum in a finite magnetic field, we find that the correlation function exhibits an oscillatory behavior that decays exponentially in space. Conversely, for a gapless imaginary spectrum, the correlation function displays an oscillatory behavior with an amplitude that decays algebraically in space; the underlying power law depends on the manifestation of two exceptional points within this phase.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.07775 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Examples of the real, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Schematic phase diagram displaying the asymptotic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Krylov spread complexity density ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Schematic phase diagram defined by the fidelity ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Contours of integration used to evaluate the contractions (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Contour of integration used to evaluate the contraction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Quasinormal modes and complexity in saddle-dominated SU(N) spin systems

    hep-th 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A family of SU(2) and SU(3) Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick-type Hamiltonians reproduces de Sitter quasinormal-mode densities of states, and late-time probes reveal integrability beneath saddle-dominated scrambling.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

125 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [63]

    Krylov complexity from integrability to chaos,

    E. Rabinovici, A. Sánchez-Garrido, R. Shir, and J. Son- ner, “Krylov complexity from integrability to chaos,” Journal of High Energy Physics2022, 151 (2022)

    work page 2022

  2. [10]

    Stochastic master equations in thermal environment,

    Stéphane Attal and Clément Pellegrini, “Stochastic master equations in thermal environment,” Open Sys- tems & Information Dynamics17, 389–408 (2010)

    2010

  3. [23]

    Many-body topology of non-Hermitian systems,

    Kohei Kawabata, Ken Shiozaki, and Shinsei Ryu, “Many-body topology of non-Hermitian systems,” Phys. Rev. B105, 165137 (2022)

    2022

  4. [1]

    In summary, we define contour integrals in the complex plane containing the contractions ⟨A0Ax⟩ and ⟨B0A±x⟩ (see Eqs

    Gapped phase In this section, we implement the Darboux method to calculate the asymptotic behavior ofCzz (x) when the imag- inary part of the spectrum (14) is gapped. In summary, we define contour integrals in the complex plane containing the contractions ⟨A0Ax⟩ and ⟨B0A±x⟩ (see Eqs. (C9) and (C17), respectively), and perform suitable series expansion aro...

  5. [2]

    The contour integral (C9) is zero, for the contour does not enclose any singularity

    The poles of f (z) are located at z = ±i and z = 0. The contour integral (C9) is zero, for the contour does not enclose any singularity. Let us note that C = C1(R) ∪ C2 ∪ C3(ϵ) ∪ C4 ∪ C5(ϵ) ∪ C6, where 0 < R <|z1|. Later, we set R → ∞and ϵ → 0. C1(R) is the semicircle of radiusR, and C4(ϵ) is the arc of unity radius that intersects with the upper and lowe...

  6. [3]

    i π r J + h J − h tan q 2 − i 2π r J + h J − h 1 + tan2 q 2 (q − k) # sin kx + lim a→0 ˆ ∞ q dk e−ak

    Gapless phase In this section, we implement alternative methods to calculate the asymptotic behavior ofCzz (x). Namely, we perform series expansion of the integrands of the contractions⟨A0Ax⟩ and ⟨B0A±x⟩ not involving functions ofx around the special points k = 0 , πand k = q = arccos( h/J). Then, we split the integrals at these points and introduce appro...

  7. [4]

    To avoid spurious results (see the discussion in Sec

    Limiting Hermitian case In this section, we calculate the asymptotic behavior of Czz (x) in the limit of no dissipation, i.e., γ → 0. To avoid spurious results (see the discussion in Sec. IIIA), this limit must be taken at the level of the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian (6), which leads to a change of sign in the resulting real spectrumE(k) = limγ→0 Λ(k). We f...

  8. [5]

    √ h2 − J 2 h x−1/2 − 5h2 + 3J 2 8h √ h2 + J 2 x−3/2 + O(x−5/2) # , h > J, − 1 4√π h J x

    Correlation function in the true Hermitian ground state For the sake of completeness, we calculate the asymptotics ofCzz (x) as x → ∞in the Hermitian ground state ofH when γ ≡ 0; namely, we setγ = 0 before imposing any sign-convention on the spectrum (cf. Eq. (14)), and then we calculate the correlation function. We resort once more to the Darboux method ...

Show all 125 references
  1. [6]

    General state changes in quantum theory,

    K Kraus, “General state changes in quantum theory,” Annals of Physics64, 311–335 (1971)

    1971

  2. [7]

    Measurement theory and stochas- tic differential equations in quantum mechanics,

    Alberto Barchielli, “Measurement theory and stochas- tic differential equations in quantum mechanics,” Phys. Rev. A34, 1642–1649 (1986)

    1986

  3. [8]

    Heinz-Peter Breuer and Francesco Petruccione, The Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 2007)

    2007

  4. [9]

    Many-body open quantum systems,

    Rosario Fazio, Jonathan Keeling, Leonardo Mazza, and Marco Schirò, “Many-body open quantum systems,” (2024), arXiv:2409.10300 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  5. [11]

    Diffusion approxi- mation of stochastic master equations with jumps,

    C. Pellegrini and F. Petruccione, “Diffusion approxi- mation of stochastic master equations with jumps,” J. Math. Phys. 50, 122101 (2009), publisher: American 34 Institute of Physics

    2009

  6. [12]

    Quantum state engineering by steering in the presence of errors,

    E. Medina-Guerra, Parveen Kumar, I. V. Gornyi, and Yuval Gefen, “Quantum state engineering by steering in the presence of errors,” Phys. Rev. Res.6, 023159 (2024)

    2024

  7. [13]

    Se- ries: Classics in Mathematics , Vol

    Tosio Kato,Perturbation theory for linear operators. Se- ries: Classics in Mathematics , Vol. 132 (Springer Sci- ence & Business Media, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013)

    2013

  8. [14]

    PT -symmetric quantum mechanics,

    Carl M. Bender, Stefan Boettcher, and Peter N. Meisinger, “PT -symmetric quantum mechanics,” Jour- nal of Mathematical Physics40, 2201–2229 (1999)

    1999

  9. [15]

    Heralded Magnetism in Non-Hermitian Atomic Systems,

    Tony E. Lee and Ching-Kit Chan, “Heralded Magnetism in Non-Hermitian Atomic Systems,” Phys. Rev. X 4, 041001 (2014)

    2014

  10. [16]

    Univer- sal non-Hermitian skin effect in two and higher dimen- sions,

    Kai Zhang, Zhesen Yang, and Chen Fang, “Univer- sal non-Hermitian skin effect in two and higher dimen- sions,” Nature Communications13, 2496 (2022)

    2022

  11. [17]

    Entanglement Phase Transition Induced by the Non- Hermitian Skin Effect,

    Kohei Kawabata, Tokiro Numasawa, and Shinsei Ryu, “Entanglement Phase Transition Induced by the Non- Hermitian Skin Effect,” Phys. Rev. X13, 021007 (2023)

    2023

  12. [18]

    Topological non-Hermitian skin effect,

    Rijia Lin, Tommy Tai, Linhu Li, and Ching Hua Lee, “Topological non-Hermitian skin effect,” Frontiers of Physics 18, 53605 (2023)

    2023

  13. [19]

    The non-Hermitian skin effect: A perspective,

    Julius T. Gohsrich, Ayan Banerjee, and Flore K. Kunst, “The non-Hermitian skin effect: A perspective,” (2024), arXiv:2410.23845 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  14. [20]

    General theory of slow non-Hermitian evolution,

    Parveen Kumar, Yuval Gefen, and Kyrylo Snizhko, “General theory of slow non-Hermitian evolution,” (2025), arXiv:2502.04214 [quant-ph]

    2025

  15. [21]

    Correlations at higher-order exceptional points in non- Hermitian models,

    Doru Sticlet, Cătălin Paşcu Moca, and Balázs Dóra, “Correlations at higher-order exceptional points in non- Hermitian models,” Phys. Rev. B108, 075133 (2023)

    2023

  16. [22]

    Correlations at PT-Symmetric Quantum Crit- ical Point,

    Balázs Dóra, Doru Sticlet, and Cătălin Paşcu Moca, “Correlations at PT-Symmetric Quantum Crit- ical Point,” Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 146804 (2022)

    2022

  17. [24]

    Hermitian Bulk – Non-Hermitian Boundary Correspondence,

    Frank Schindler, Kaiyuan Gu, Biao Lian, and Kohei Kawabata, “Hermitian Bulk – Non-Hermitian Boundary Correspondence,” PRX Quantum4, 030315 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    Entanglementphasetransitionsinnon- Hermitian Floquet systems,

    LongwenZhou,“Entanglementphasetransitionsinnon- Hermitian Floquet systems,” Phys. Rev. Res.6, 023081 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    Measurement phase transitions in the no-click limit as quantum phase transitions of a non-hermitean vacuum,

    Caterina Zerba and Alessandro Silva, “Measurement phase transitions in the no-click limit as quantum phase transitions of a non-hermitean vacuum,” SciPost Phys. Core 6, 051 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    Entanglement and correlation spreading in non-Hermitian spin chains,

    Xhek Turkeshi and Marco Schiró, “Entanglement and correlation spreading in non-Hermitian spin chains,” Phys. Rev. B107, L020403 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    Measurement-induced entanglement transitions in the quantum Ising chain: From infinite to zero clicks,

    Xhek Turkeshi, Alberto Biella, Rosario Fazio, Marcello Dalmonte, and Marco Schiró, “Measurement-induced entanglement transitions in the quantum Ising chain: From infinite to zero clicks,” Phys. Rev. B103, 224210 (2021)

    2021

  22. [30]

    Volume-to-area law entanglement transition in a non- Hermitian free fermionic chain,

    Youenn Le Gal, Xhek Turkeshi, and Marco Schirò, “Volume-to-area law entanglement transition in a non- Hermitian free fermionic chain,” SciPost Physics14, 138 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    A spin chain with non-Hermitian PT −symmetric boundary couplings: exact solution, dissipative Kondo effect, and phase transitions on the edge,

    Pradip Kattel, Parameshwar R. Pasnoori, J. H. Pixley, and Natan Andrei, “A spin chain with non-Hermitian PT −symmetric boundary couplings: exact solution, dissipative Kondo effect, and phase transitions on the edge,” (2024), arXiv:2406.10334 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Dissipation driven phase transition in the non-Hermitian Kondo model,

    Pradip Kattel, Abay Zhakenov, Parameshwar R. Pas- noori, Patrick Azaria, and Natan Andrei, “Dissipation driven phase transition in the non-Hermitian Kondo model,” (2024), arXiv:2402.09510 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Biorthogonal Dynamical Quantum Phase Transitions in Non-Hermitian Systems,

    Yecheng Jing, Jian-Jun Dong, Yu-Yu Zhang, and Zi- Xiang Hu, “Biorthogonal Dynamical Quantum Phase Transitions in Non-Hermitian Systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 220402 (2024)

    2024

  26. [34]

    Work statistics and generalized Loschmidt echo for the Hatano-Nelson model,

    Balázs Dóra and Cătălin Pa şcu Moca, “Work statistics and generalized Loschmidt echo for the Hatano-Nelson model,” Phys. Rev. B110, L121116 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    Persistent anomaly in dynamical quantum phase transition in long-range non-Hermitian p-wave Kitaev chain,

    Debashish Mondal and Tanay Nag, “Persistent anomaly in dynamical quantum phase transition in long-range non-Hermitian p-wave Kitaev chain,” The European Physical Journal B97, 59 (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    Comprehensive study of dynamical phase transitions in one-dimensional XY model,

    Bao-Ming Xu and Xiu-Ying Zhang, “Comprehensive study of dynamical phase transitions in one-dimensional XY model,” (2024), arXiv:2408.00597 [cond-mat.stat- mech]

    2024 arXiv

  29. [37]

    De- tecting exceptional points through dynamics in non- Hermitian systems,

    Keshav Das Agarwal, Tanoy Kanti Konar, Leela Ganesh Chandra Lakkaraju, and Aditi Sen(De), “De- tecting exceptional points through dynamics in non- Hermitian systems,” Phys. Rev. A110, 012226 (2024)

    2024

  30. [38]

    Recog- nizing critical lines via entanglement in non-Hermitian systems,

    Keshav Das Agarwal, Tanoy Kanti Konar, Leela Ganesh Chandra Lakkaraju, and Aditi Sen De, “Recog- nizing critical lines via entanglement in non-Hermitian systems,” (2023), arXiv:2305.08374 [quant-ph]

    2023

  31. [39]

    Phase transitions and gener- alized biorthogonal polarization in non-Hermitian sys- tems,

    Elisabet Edvardsson, Flore K. Kunst, Tsuneya Yoshida, and Emil J. Bergholtz, “Phase transitions and gener- alized biorthogonal polarization in non-Hermitian sys- tems,” Phys. Rev. Res.2, 043046 (2020)

    2020

  32. [40]

    Topological Phases of Non-Hermitian Systems,

    Zongping Gong, Yuto Ashida, Kohei Kawabata, Kazuaki Takasan, Sho Higashikawa, and Masahito Ueda, “Topological Phases of Non-Hermitian Systems,” Phys. Rev. X8, 031079 (2018)

    2018

  33. [41]

    Field theory of non-Hermitian disordered sys- tems,

    Ze Chen, Kohei Kawabata, Anish Kulkarni, and Shin- sei Ryu, “Field theory of non-Hermitian disordered sys- tems,” Phys. Rev. B111, 054203 (2025)

    2025

  34. [42]

    Symmetry-protected nodal phases in non-Hermitian systems,

    JanCarlBudich, JohanCarlström, FloreK.Kunst, and Emil J. Bergholtz, “Symmetry-protected nodal phases in non-Hermitian systems,” Phys. Rev. B 99, 041406 (2019)

    2019

  35. [43]

    Exceptional topology of non-Hermitian sys- tems,

    Emil J. Bergholtz, Jan Carl Budich, and Flore K. Kunst, “Exceptional topology of non-Hermitian sys- tems,” Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 015005 (2021)

    2021

  36. [44]

    Topological Order in the Spectral Riemann Surfaces of Non-Hermitian Systems,

    Anton Montag, Alexander Felski, and Flore K. Kunst, “Topological Order in the Spectral Riemann Surfaces of Non-Hermitian Systems,” (2024), arXiv:2410.18616 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  37. [45]

    QuantumZenoeffectappearsinstages,

    Kyrylo Snizhko, Parveen Kumar, and Alessandro Romito,“QuantumZenoeffectappearsinstages,” Phys- ical Review Research2, 033512 (2020)

    2020

  38. [46]

    Topological transitions in quantum jump dynamics: Hidden exceptional points,

    Andrei I. Pavlov, Yuval Gefen, and Alexander Shnirman, “Topological transitions in quantum jump dynamics: Hidden exceptional points,” (2025), arXiv:2408.05270 [quant-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  39. [47]

    Measurement-induced phase transition for free fermions above one dimension,

    Igor Poboiko, Igor V. Gornyi, and Alexander D. Mirlin, “Measurement-induced phase transition for free fermions above one dimension,” Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 110403 (2024). 35

    2024

  40. [48]

    Localization, fractality, and er- godicity in a monitored qubit,

    Paul Pöpperl, Igor V. Gornyi, David B. Saakian, and Oleg M. Yevtushenko, “Localization, fractality, and er- godicity in a monitored qubit,” Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 013313 (2024)

    2024

  41. [49]

    Experi- mental Liouvillian exceptional points in a quantum sys- tem without Hamiltonian singularities,

    Shilan Abo, Patrycja Tulewicz, Karol Bartkiewicz, Şahin K Özdemir, and Adam Miranowicz, “Experi- mental Liouvillian exceptional points in a quantum sys- tem without Hamiltonian singularities,” New Journal of Physics 26, 123032 (2024)

    2024

  42. [50]

    Dynamical quantum phase transitions in Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev Lindbladians,

    Kohei Kawabata, Anish Kulkarni, Jiachen Li, Tokiro Numasawa, and Shinsei Ryu, “Dynamical quantum phase transitions in Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev Lindbladians,” Phys. Rev. B108, 075110 (2023)

    2023

  43. [51]

    Non-Hermitian skin effect in quadratic Lindbladian systems: An adjoint fermion approach,

    Ziheng Zhou and Zhenhua Yu, “Non-Hermitian skin effect in quadratic Lindbladian systems: An adjoint fermion approach,” Phys. Rev. A106, 032216 (2022)

    2022

  44. [52]

    Singular-Value Statistics of Non- Hermitian Random Matrices and Open Quantum Sys- tems,

    Kohei Kawabata, Zhenyu Xiao, Tomi Ohtsuki, and Ryuichi Shindou, “Singular-Value Statistics of Non- Hermitian Random Matrices and Open Quantum Sys- tems,” PRX Quantum4, 040312 (2023)

    2023

  45. [53]

    Diagnosing non-Hermitian many-body localization and quantum chaos via singular value de- composition,

    Federico Roccati, Federico Balducci, Ruth Shir, and Aurélia Chenu, “Diagnosing non-Hermitian many-body localization and quantum chaos via singular value de- composition,” Phys. Rev. B109, L140201 (2024)

    2024

  46. [54]

    High-order series expansion of non-Hermitian quantum spin models,

    Lea Lenke, Matthias Mühlhauser, and Kai Phillip Schmidt, “High-order series expansion of non-Hermitian quantum spin models,” Phys. Rev. B 104, 195137 (2021)

    2021

  47. [55]

    Environment-Independent Decoherence Rate in Classi- cally Chaotic Systems,

    Rodolfo A. Jalabert and Horacio M. Pastawski, “Environment-Independent Decoherence Rate in Classi- cally Chaotic Systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 2490–2493 (2001)

    2001

  48. [56]

    Perturbation Independent Decay of the Loschmidt Echo in a Many- Body System,

    C. M. Sánchez, A. K. Chattah, K. X. Wei, L. Buljuba- sich, P.Cappellaro, andH.M.Pastawski,“Perturbation Independent Decay of the Loschmidt Echo in a Many- Body System,” Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 030601 (2020)

    2020

  49. [57]

    A universal oper- ator growth hypothesis,

    Daniel E. Parker, Xiangyu Cao, Alexander Avdoshkin, Thomas Scaffidi, and Ehud Altman, “A universal oper- ator growth hypothesis,” Phys. Rev. X9, 041017 (2019)

    2019

  50. [58]

    Assess- ing the saturation of Krylov complexity as a measure of chaos,

    Bernardo L. Español and Diego A. Wisniacki, “Assess- ing the saturation of Krylov complexity as a measure of chaos,” Phys. Rev. E107, 024217 (2023)

    2023

  51. [59]

    Quantifying operator spreading and chaos in Krylov subspaces with quantum state reconstruction,

    Abinash Sahu, Naga Dileep Varikuti, Bishal Kumar Das, and Vaibhav Madhok, “Quantifying operator spreading and chaos in Krylov subspaces with quantum state reconstruction,” Phys. Rev. B108, 224306 (2023)

    2023

  52. [60]

    Universal chaotic dynamics from Krylov space,

    Johanna Erdmenger, Shao-Kai Jian, and Zhuo-Yu Xian, “Universal chaotic dynamics from Krylov space,” Journal of High Energy Physics2023, 176 (2023)

    2023

  53. [61]

    Krylov complexity and chaos in quantum mechanics,

    Koji Hashimoto, Keiju Murata, Norihiro Tanahashi, and Ryota Watanabe, “Krylov complexity and chaos in quantum mechanics,” Journal of High Energy Physics 2023, 40 (2023)

    2023

  54. [62]

    Integrability-to-chaos transition through the Krylov approach for state evolution,

    Gastón F. Scialchi, Augusto J. Roncaglia, and Diego A. Wisniacki, “Integrability-to-chaos transition through the Krylov approach for state evolution,” Phys. Rev. E 109, 054209 (2024)

    2024

  55. [64]

    Spectral and Krylov complexity in billiard systems,

    Hugo A. Camargo, Viktor Jahnke, Hyun-Sik Jeong, Keun-Young Kim, and Mitsuhiro Nishida, “Spectral and Krylov complexity in billiard systems,” Phys. Rev. D 109, 046017 (2024)

    2024

  56. [65]

    Spread and spectral complexity in quantum spin chains: from integrability to chaos,

    Hugo A. Camargo, Kyoung-Bum Huh, Viktor Jahnke, Hyun-Sik Jeong, Keun-Young Kim, and Mit- suhiro Nishida, “Spread and spectral complexity in quantum spin chains: from integrability to chaos,” Journal of High Energy Physics2024 (2024), 10.1007/jhep08(2024)241

    2024 doi

  57. [66]

    Krylov com- plexity as an order parameter for quantum chaotic- integrable transitions,

    Matteo Baggioli, Kyoung-Bum Huh, Hyun-Sik Jeong, Keun-Young Kim, and Juan F. Pedraza, “Krylov com- plexity as an order parameter for quantum chaotic- integrable transitions,” Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 023028 (2025)

    2025

  58. [67]

    Krylov Complexity in Mixed Phase Space,

    Kyoung-Bum Huh, Hyun-Sik Jeong, Leopoldo A. Pando Zayas, and Juan F. Pedraza, “Krylov Complexity in Mixed Phase Space,” (2025), arXiv:2412.04963 [hep- th]

    2025 arXiv

  59. [68]

    Spread complexity and topological transitions in the Kitaev chain,

    Pawel Caputa, Nitin Gupta, S. Shajidul Haque, Sinong Liu, Jeff Murugan, and Hendrik J. R. Van Zyl, “Spread complexity and topological transitions in the Kitaev chain,” Journal of High Energy Physics 2023, 120 (2023)

    2023

  60. [69]

    Quantum complexity and topological phases of matter,

    Pawel Caputa and Sinong Liu, “Quantum complexity and topological phases of matter,” Phys. Rev. B106, 195125 (2022)

    2022

  61. [70]

    Krylov complexity and dynamical phase tran- sition in the quenched Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model,

    Pedro H. S. Bento, Adolfo del Campo, and Lucas C. Céleri, “Krylov complexity and dynamical phase tran- sition in the quenched Lipkin-Meshkov-Glick model,” Phys. Rev. B109, 224304 (2024)

    2024

  62. [71]

    Complexity enriched dynamical phases for fermions on graphs,

    Wei Xia, Jie Zou, and Xiaopeng Li, “Complexity enriched dynamical phases for fermions on graphs,” (2024), arXiv:2404.08055 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  63. [72]

    Time evolution of spread complexity in quenched Lipkin–Meshkov–Glick model,

    Mir Afrasiar, Jaydeep Kumar Basak, Bidyut Dey, Ku- nal Pal, and Kuntal Pal, “Time evolution of spread complexity in quenched Lipkin–Meshkov–Glick model,” Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experi- ment 2023, 103101 (2023)

    2023

  64. [73]

    Spread complexity in saddle-dominated scram- bling,

    Kyoung-Bum Huh, Hyun-Sik Jeong, and Juan F. Pe- draza, “Spread complexity in saddle-dominated scram- bling,” Journal of High Energy Physics 2024 (2024), 10.1007/jhep05(2024)137

    2024 doi

  65. [74]

    Krylov complexity of den- sity matrix operators,

    Pawel Caputa, Hyun-Sik Jeong, Sinong Liu, Juan F. Pedraza, and Le-Chen Qu, “Krylov complexity of den- sity matrix operators,” Journal of High Energy Physics 2024 (2024), 10.1007/jhep05(2024)337

    2024 doi

  66. [75]

    Probing quantum scars and weak ergodicity breaking through quantum complexity,

    Budhaditya Bhattacharjee, Samudra Sur, and Pratik Nandy, “Probing quantum scars and weak ergodicity breaking through quantum complexity,” Physical Re- view B106 (2022), 10.1103/physrevb.106.205150

    2022 doi

  67. [76]

    Geometry of Krylov complexity,

    Pawel Caputa, Javier M. Magan, and Dimitrios Pa- tramanis, “Geometry of Krylov complexity,” Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013041 (2022)

    2022

  68. [77]

    Krylov complexity in a natural basis for the Schrödinger al- gebra,

    Dimitrios Patramanis and Watse Sybesma, “Krylov complexity in a natural basis for the Schrödinger al- gebra,” SciPost Phys. Core7, 037 (2024)

    2024

  69. [78]

    Quantum chaos and the com- plexity of spread of states,

    Vijay Balasubramanian, Pawel Caputa, Javier M. Ma- gan, and Qingyue Wu, “Quantum chaos and the com- plexity of spread of states,” Phys. Rev. D106, 046007 (2022)

    2022

  70. [79]

    Ulti- mate speed limits to the growth of operator complexity,

    Niklas Hörnedal, Nicoletta Carabba, Apollonas S. Matsoukas-Roubeas, and Adolfo del Campo, “Ulti- mate speed limits to the growth of operator complexity,” Communications Physics5, 207 (2022)

    2022

  71. [80]

    Quantum speed limits on operator flows and correlation functions,

    Nicoletta Carabba, Niklas Hörnedal, and Adolfo del Campo, “Quantum speed limits on operator flows and correlation functions,” Quantum6, 884 (2022). 36

    2022

  72. [81]

    Speed Limits and Scrambling in Krylov Space,

    Ankit Gill and Tapobrata Sarkar, “Speed Limits and Scrambling in Krylov Space,” (2024), arXiv:2408.06855 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  73. [82]

    Speed limits to the growth of Krylov complexity in open quantum systems,

    Aranya Bhattacharya, Pingal Pratyush Nath, and Hi- manshu Sahu, “Speed limits to the growth of Krylov complexity in open quantum systems,” Phys. Rev. D 109, L121902 (2024)

    2024

  74. [83]

    Krylov com- plexity in open quantum systems,

    Chang Liu, Haifeng Tang, and Hui Zhai, “Krylov com- plexity in open quantum systems,” Phys. Rev. Res.5, 033085 (2023)

    2023

  75. [84]

    Operator growth and spread complex- ity in open quantum systems,

    Eoin Carolan, Anthony Kiely, Steve Campbell, and Se- bastian Deffner, “Operator growth and spread complex- ity in open quantum systems,” Europhysics Letters147, 38002 (2024), publisher: EDP Sciences, IOP Publishing and Società Italiana di Fisica

    2024

  76. [85]

    Operator growth in open quantum systems: lessons from the dissipative SYK,

    Budhaditya Bhattacharjee, Xiangyu Cao, Pratik Nandy, and Tanay Pathak, “Operator growth in open quantum systems: lessons from the dissipative SYK,” Journal of High Energy Physics2023, 54 (2023)

    2023

  77. [86]

    Operator growth and Krylov construction in dissipative open quantum sys- tems,

    Aranya Bhattacharya, Pratik Nandy, Pingal Pratyush Nath, and Himanshu Sahu, “Operator growth and Krylov construction in dissipative open quantum sys- tems,” Journal of High Energy Physics 2022, 1–31 (2022)

    2022

  78. [87]

    On Krylov complexity in open systems: an approach via bi-Lanczos algorithm,

    Aranya Bhattacharya, Pratik Nandy, Pingal Pratyush Nath, and Himanshu Sahu, “On Krylov complexity in open systems: an approach via bi-Lanczos algorithm,” Journal of High Energy Physics2023, 66 (2023)

    2023

  79. [88]

    Spread complexity for measurement-induced non-unitary dynamics and Zeno effect,

    Aranya Bhattacharya, Rathindra Nath Das, Bidyut Dey, and Johanna Erdmenger, “Spread complexity for measurement-induced non-unitary dynamics and Zeno effect,” Journal of High Energy Physics 2024, 179 (2024)

    2024

  80. [89]

    A Krylov space approach to Singu- lar Value Decomposition in non-Hermitian systems,

    Pratik Nandy, Tanay Pathak, Zhuo-Yu Xian, and Jo- hanna Erdmenger, “A Krylov space approach to Singu- lar Value Decomposition in non-Hermitian systems,” (2024), arXiv:2411.09309 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  81. [90]

    Spread Complexity in Non-Hermitian Many-Body Localization Transition,

    Maitri Ganguli, “Spread Complexity in Non-Hermitian Many-Body Localization Transition,” (2024), arXiv:2411.11347 [cond-mat.dis-nn]

    2024 arXiv

  82. [91]

    Many-body phase transitions in a non- Hermitian Ising chain,

    Chao-Ze Lu, Xiaolong Deng, Su-Peng Kou, and Gaoy- ong Sun, “Many-body phase transitions in a non- Hermitian Ising chain,” Phys. Rev. B 110, 014441 (2024)

    2024

  83. [92]

    Entanglement tran- sitions in a periodically driven non-Hermitian Ising chain,

    Tista Banerjee and K. Sengupta, “Entanglement tran- sitions in a periodically driven non-Hermitian Ising chain,” Phys. Rev. B109, 094306 (2024)

    2024

  84. [93]

    1011 (Springer Cham, Berlin, 2023)

    Chon-Fai Kam, Wei-Min Zhang, and Da-Hsuan Feng, Coherent States: New Insights into Quantum Mechanics with Applications, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 1011 (Springer Cham, Berlin, 2023)

    2023

  85. [94]

    Quantum phase tran- sition in a non-Hermitian XY spin chain with global complex transverse field,

    Yu-Guo Liu, Lu Xu, and Zhi Li, “Quantum phase tran- sition in a non-Hermitian XY spin chain with global complex transverse field,” Journal of Physics: Con- densed Matter33, 295401 (2021)

    2021

  86. [95]

    Hidden continuous quantum phase transition without gap closing in non-Hermitian transverse Ising model,

    Fei Yang, Heng Wang, Meng-Lei Yang, Cui-Xian Guo, Xiao-Ran Wang, Gao-Yong Sun, and Su-Peng Kou, “Hidden continuous quantum phase transition without gap closing in non-Hermitian transverse Ising model,” New Journal of Physics24, 043046 (2022)

    2022

  87. [96]

    Many-Body Quan- tum Zeno Effect and Measurement-Induced Subradi- ance Transition,

    Alberto Biella and Marco Schiró, “Many-Body Quan- tum Zeno Effect and Measurement-Induced Subradi- ance Transition,” Quantum5, 528 (2021)

    2021

  88. [97]

    Algebraic analysis of non- Hermitian quadratic Hamiltonians,

    Francisco M. Fernández, “Algebraic analysis of non- Hermitian quadratic Hamiltonians,” Annals of Physics 457, 169429 (2023)

    2023

  89. [98]

    A step-by-step Bogoliubov transforma- tion method for diagonalising a kind of non-Hermitian effective Hamiltonian,

    Nguyen Ba An, “A step-by-step Bogoliubov transforma- tion method for diagonalising a kind of non-Hermitian effective Hamiltonian,” Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics 21, L1209 (1988)

    1988

  90. [99]

    Askold Perelomov, Generalized Coherent States and Their Applications (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1986)

    1986

  91. [100]

    Twosolublemodelsofanantiferromagneticchain,

    Elliott Lieb, Theodore Schultz, and Daniel Mattis, “Twosolublemodelsofanantiferromagneticchain,” An- nals of Physics16, 407–466 (1961)

    1961

  92. [101]

    PT -symmetric, non-Hermitian quantum many-body physics–a methodological perspective,

    V. Meden, L. Grunwald, and D. M. Kennes, “PT -symmetric, non-Hermitian quantum many-body physics–a methodological perspective,” Reports on Progress in Physics86, 124501 (2023), publisher: IOP Publishing

    2023

  93. [102]

    Universal prop- erties of dissipative Tomonaga-Luttinger liquids: Case study of a non-Hermitian XXZ spin chain,

    Kazuki Yamamoto, Masaya Nakagawa, Masaki Tezuka, Masahito Ueda, and Norio Kawakami, “Universal prop- erties of dissipative Tomonaga-Luttinger liquids: Case study of a non-Hermitian XXZ spin chain,” Phys. Rev. B 105, 205125 (2022)

    2022

  94. [103]

    Theory of Non-Hermitian Fermionic Super- fluidity with a Complex-Valued Interaction,

    Kazuki Yamamoto, Masaya Nakagawa, Kyosuke Adachi, Kazuaki Takasan, Masahito Ueda, and Norio Kawakami, “Theory of Non-Hermitian Fermionic Super- fluidity with a Complex-Valued Interaction,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 123601 (2019)

    2019

  95. [104]

    Biorthogonal quantum mechanics,

    Dorje C Brody, “Biorthogonal quantum mechanics,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical47, 035305 (2013)

    2013

  96. [105]

    A spin chain model with non-Hermitian interaction: the Ising quantum spin chain in an imaginary field,

    Olalla A. Castro-Alvaredo and Andreas Fring, “A spin chain model with non-Hermitian interaction: the Ising quantum spin chain in an imaginary field,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 42, 465211 (2009)

    2009

  97. [106]

    Decomposition formulas for su(1, 1) and su(2) Lie algebras and their applications in quantum optics,

    Masashi Ban, “Decomposition formulas for su(1, 1) and su(2) Lie algebras and their applications in quantum optics,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B10, 1347–1359 (1993)

    1993

  98. [107]

    However, our physical motivation is to use |Ω⟩, which can be reached from the state|0⟩ via the unitary evolution (32), independent of the spectrum of H

    In principle, there is no restriction on the choice of state for computing the correlation function (57), provided it is a valid state in the Hilbert space of the quantum spin chain we study. However, our physical motivation is to use |Ω⟩, which can be reached from the state|0...

  99. [108]

    Asymptotic Correlations in Gapped and Critical Topological Phases of 1D Quan- tum Systems,

    N. G. Jones and R. Verresen, “Asymptotic Correlations in Gapped and Critical Topological Phases of 1D Quan- tum Systems,” Journal of Statistical Physics175, 1164– 1213 (2019)

    2019

  100. [109]

    Temme, Asymptotic Methods for Integrals (World Scientific, Singapore, 2015)

    Nico M. Temme, Asymptotic Methods for Integrals (World Scientific, Singapore, 2015)

    2015

  101. [110]

    Theory of Toeplitz Determinants and the Spin Correlations of the Two-Dimensional Ising Model. I,

    Tai Tsun Wu, “Theory of Toeplitz Determinants and the Spin Correlations of the Two-Dimensional Ising Model. I,” Phys. Rev.149, 380–401 (1966)

    1966

  102. [111]

    Theory of free fermions under random projective measurements,

    Igor Poboiko, Paul Pöpperl, Igor V. Gornyi, and Alexander D. Mirlin, “Theory of free fermions under random projective measurements,” Phys. Rev. X 13, 041046 (2023)

    2023

  103. [112]

    Measurement-induced transitions for interacting fermions,

    Igor Poboiko, Paul Pöpperl, Igor V. Gornyi, and Alexander D. Mirlin, “Measurement-induced transitions for interacting fermions,” Phys. Rev. B 111, 024204 (2025)

    2025

  104. [113]

    Krylov Subspace Methods for Quantum Dynamics with Time- Dependent Generators,

    Kazutaka Takahashi and Adolfo del Campo, “Krylov Subspace Methods for Quantum Dynamics with Time- Dependent Generators,” Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 030401 37 (2025)

    2025

  105. [114]

    Quantum Dynamics in Krylov Space: Methods and Applications,

    Pratik Nandy, Apollonas S. Matsoukas-Roubeas, Pablo Martínez-Azcona, Anatoly Dymarsky, and Adolfo del Campo, “Quantum Dynamics in Krylov Space: Methods and Applications,” (2024), arXiv:2405.09628 [quant-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  106. [115]

    A similar result was obtained in Ref. [63]

  107. [116]

    Statistical Mechanics of theXY Model. I,

    Eytan Barouch, Barry M. McCoy, and Max Dresden, “Statistical Mechanics of theXY Model. I,” Phys. Rev. A 2, 1075–1092 (1970)

    1970

  108. [117]

    Statistical Me- chanics of the XY Model. II. Spin-Correlation Func- tions,

    Eytan Barouch and Barry M. McCoy, “Statistical Me- chanics of the XY Model. II. Spin-Correlation Func- tions,” Phys. Rev. A3, 786–804 (1971)

    1971

  109. [118]

    Statistical Me- chanics of the XY Model. III,

    Eytan Barouch and Barry M. McCoy, “Statistical Me- chanics of the XY Model. III,” Phys. Rev. A3, 2137– 2140 (1971)

    1971

  110. [119]

    Statistical Mechanics of theXY Model. IV. Time-Dependent Spin-Correlation Functions,

    Barry M. McCoy, Eytan Barouch, and Douglas B. Abraham, “Statistical Mechanics of theXY Model. IV. Time-Dependent Spin-Correlation Functions,” Phys. Rev. A4, 2331–2341 (1971)

    1971

  111. [120]

    On the evolution of operator complexity beyond scram- bling,

    J.L.F. Barbón, E. Rabinovici, R. Shir, and R. Sinha, “On the evolution of operator complexity beyond scram- bling,” Journal of High Energy Physics 2019 (2019), 10.1007/jhep10(2019)264

    2019 doi

  112. [121]

    Topological quantum criti- cality in non-Hermitian extended Kitaev chain,

    S. Rahul and Sujit Sarkar, “Topological quantum criti- cality in non-Hermitian extended Kitaev chain,” Scien- tific Reports12, 6993 (2022)

    2022

  113. [122]

    Unconventional quantum criti- cality in a non-Hermitian extended Kitaev chain,

    S. Rahul, Nilanjan Roy, Ranjith R. Kumar, Y. R. Kar- tik, and Sujit Sarkar, “Unconventional quantum criti- cality in a non-Hermitian extended Kitaev chain,” Sci- entific Reports13, 12121 (2023)

    2023

  114. [123]

    Dynamics of monitored SSH Model in Krylov Space: From Complexity to Quantum Fisher In- formation,

    Nilachal Chakrabarti, Neha Nirbhan, and Arpan Bhat- tacharyya, “Dynamics of monitored SSH Model in Krylov Space: From Complexity to Quantum Fisher In- formation,” (2025), arXiv:2502.03434 [quant-ph]

    2025 arXiv

  115. [124]

    The quantum Ising chain for be- ginners,

    Glen Bigan Mbeng, Angelo Russomanno, and Giuseppe E. Santoro, “The quantum Ising chain for be- ginners,” SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes , 82 (2024)

    2024

  116. [125]

    The one-dimensional Ising model with a transverse field,

    Pierre Pfeuty, “The one-dimensional Ising model with a transverse field,” Annals of Physics57, 79–90 (1970)

    1970

  117. [126]

    Fabio Franchini, An Introduction to Integrable Tech- niques for One-Dimensional Quantum Systems , 1st ed., Lecture Notes in Physics (Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2017)

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.