Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Comprehensive Review of Analytical and Numerical Approaches in Earth-to-Air Heat Exchangers and Exergoeconomic Evaluations

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This review paper claims that Earth-to-Air Heat Exchanger (EAHE) research is mature enough to be organized into analytical, numerical, and exergoeconomic streams, and that this synthesis supports their adoption for low-energy…

desk verdict The paper's central claim of a systematic review is contradicted by its own reference list, which contains a large block of unrelated papers; the rest is a thin, error-prone summary. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.08553 v1 pith:QEMAYP6R submitted 2025-02-12 math.NA cs.NA

Saeed Asadi , Mohsen Mohammadagha , Hajar Kazemi Naeini This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.NAcs.NA
keywords Earth-to-AirHeatExchangerExergyAnalysisPassiveCoolingExergoeconomicsNumericalSimulationUndergroundairductsHVACenergyefficiencyGreenhouse
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper is a review rather than a new experimental study. Its goal is to show that the scattered research on Earth-to-Air Heat Exchangers (EAHEs) — buried ducts that use the ground's stable temperature to pre-cool or pre-heat ventilation air — can be organized into three coherent streams: analytical models, numerical simulations, and exergoeconomic assessments that combine thermodynamic efficiency with cost. The authors argue that viewing these streams together makes a stronger case for EAHEs than any single study, because analytical results give design formulas, simulations add real-world optimization, and exergoeconomics shows when the technology pays for itself. If the synthesis holds, it gives engineers and policymakers a single reference for choosing system dimensions, burial depths, and hybrid renewable configurations.

What carries the argument

The central organizing device is the three-category taxonomy: analytical studies, numerical studies, and exergoeconomic studies. The mathematical machinery supplied to hold the taxonomy together is the exergy balance, written as $\dot{Ex}_{in} - \dot{Ex}_{out} = \dot{Ex}_{dest}$, with irreversibility $I = \dot{Ex}_{dest} = T_0 \dot{S}_{gen}$ and the efficiency definitions $\varepsilon_1 = \dot{Ex}_{out}/\dot{Ex}_{in}$ and the product-to-fuel ratio version. These equations give the exergoeconomic stream a common language for comparing systems across different climates and configurations.

What would settle it

Run a structured query for 'earth-to-air heat exchanger' or 'underground air duct' across engineering databases and compare the results with the review's citation list; if a large share of the cited works concern storm sewers, drought forecasting, or advertising rather than EAHEs, the claimed comprehensive synthesis fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central claim is that the EAHE literature, including work back to the early 1990s, is mature enough to be grouped under three headings, each with a distinct question. Analytical studies ask how outlet air temperature and thermal efficiency depend on duct length, diameter, depth, and airflow; numerical studies ask how a particular configuration performs under realistic soil, climate, and building conditions; exergoeconomic studies ask whether the energy saved justifies the installation and operating cost. The paper presents the key equations—an exergy balance, exergy destruction proportional to entropy generation, and three exergetic efficiency definitions—as the common analytical machinery, and it reports representative findings from the cited literature, such as a roughly 30% cooling-energy reduction in a Kuwait residential simulation, recommended burial depths near 3 m, and exergoeconomic COPs above 10 in greenhouse applications. The intended outcome is that future researchers can position new work within one of the three streams and use the consolidated evidence to justify EAHE adoption.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the review is built on a systematic and on-topic literature search; if that premise fails, the claimed comprehensiveness of the synthesis collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the classification is adopted, new EAHE papers could be labeled by stream, making it easier to compare analytical design charts with numerical results and field data.
  • The cited findings—30% cooling savings in desert homes, optimal burial depth around 3 m, and COP values sometimes exceeding 10 in greenhouses—would give designers concrete starting values before site-specific simulation.
  • The exergoeconomic evidence, if correct, strengthens the case for pairing EAHEs with photovoltaic panels or heat pumps rather than relying on grid-powered HVAC during peak hours.
  • The paper's key challenges list, covering soil thermal conductivity, moisture effects, and renewable integration, would define the next research agenda for the field.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial extension: the same analytical/numerical/exergoeconomic taxonomy could be applied to other passive-cooling technologies—wind towers, ground-source heat pumps, solar chimneys—to make cross-technology comparisons on a common footing.
  • Editorial extension: the exergy-balance equations and efficiency definitions in Section 3 could be turned into a standardized reporting template, so that new EAHE studies report exergy destruction and exergetic efficiency in comparable units.
  • Editorial extension: the comprehensiveness claim is directly testable by re-running the categorization on a structured database search; if a formal search protocol is added, the review could be updated into a genuinely reproducible scoping review.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript presents itself as a comprehensive, systematic review of research on Earth-to-Air Heat Exchangers (EAHEs), organized into three categories: analytical studies, numerical studies, and exergoeconomic analyses. It summarizes a small set of EAHE papers (primarily from the 1990s through 2011, plus a few later items), provides standard exergy balance equations, and concludes that EAHEs are a promising sustainable technology. The abstract and title explicitly claim systematic categorization and synthesis.

Significance. If the paper's claims were reliable, it could serve as a useful entry point for researchers and policymakers interested in EAHEs. The paper does provide a handful of correct summaries of genuine EAHE studies (e.g., the Ozgener and Ozgener exergy analyses, Al-Ajmi et al., Bansal et al.) and reproduces well-known exergy balance equations. However, the review's own reference list and internal text contradict the core claim of systematic and comprehensive coverage. No search methodology is described, and large portions of the 'numerical studies' section are devoted to works on storm sewers, drought forecasting, airport security queues, media advertising, and other unrelated topics. The numerous author-name and citation errors further undermine the paper's reliability as a reference. The paper makes no original technical contribution and contains no derivations; its value, if any, would rest entirely on the accuracy and completeness of its literature synthesis, and that synthesis is not dependable.

major comments (4)
  1. [§2.2 (Numerical Studies), references [28]–[46]] The central claim of the paper—that it 'systematically categorizes and synthesizes research on EAHEs'—is directly undermined by the content of §2.2. The paragraph presents references [28] through [46] as part of a review of numerical EAHE studies, but the majority of these references concern unrelated topics: media advertising [28], OECD energy-growth analysis [29], stormwater digital twins [30], diesel engine NOx emissions [31], groundwater remediation [32], coastal terrain segmentation [33], reverse logistics [34], concrete crack detection [35], storm sewer geysers [36], hydrometeorological extremes in Bangladesh [37], airport security queues [40], meteorological drought forecasting [41,42], road construction value engineering [43], project management quality [44], and sewer filling/emptying simulations [45,46]. Only [38] is directly about a ground-to-air heat exchanger. Because the claimed comprehensiveness is the paper's main contribution, this is not a minor editorial lapse; it is a load-bearing deficiency that invalidates the numerical-studies component of the review.
  2. [§3 (Methodology)] The section labeled 'Methodology' contains only standard exergy balance equations (Eqs. 1–8) and does not describe any systematic review method. There is no statement of databases searched, search terms, inclusion/exclusion criteria, screening procedure, or synthesis method. Without such information, the paper's assertion of being a 'systematic' review cannot be verified, and the presence of a large block of off-topic references (§2.2) indicates that no effective screening was performed. For a review paper, the methodology is the foundation of the central claim; its absence is a major flaw.
  3. [§2.1 and §2.2 (author/citation accuracy)] Several in-text attributions do not match the corresponding reference entries. In §2.1, 'Karate and Kreider (1995)' corresponds to reference [12], which is 'Krarti and Kreider'; 'Kokomo et al. (2008)' corresponds to reference [15], which is 'Cucumo et al.'; and in §2.2, 'Chau and Tiwari (2009)' corresponds to reference [19], which is 'Chel and Tiwari'. These are not mere typographical slips in the reference list; they appear in the body text as the names of the cited authors, so a reader relying on the review would be misled about the literature. This level of inaccuracy is incompatible with the paper's stated purpose as a comprehensive reference.
  4. [§4 (Studies on Exergy Analysis)] While the summaries of the Ozgener and Ozgener studies and the Yildiz et al. study are topically relevant, the section does not provide a critical synthesis or any comparative assessment of the reported COP and exergetic efficiency values across different climates and system configurations. The paper's conclusion draws broad claims about 'robust evidence of cost-effectiveness' without quantitative support from the reviewed studies. This weakens the 'exergoeconomic evaluations' component of the claimed tripartite synthesis.
minor comments (5)
  1. [General / References] References [6] through [10] (Lienau, Lund, Kavanaugh, Rafferty) are listed but are never cited in the body text; the narrative jumps from [5] to [11]. The authors should either cite these sources where relevant or remove them.
  2. [Figure 1] The text states 'Figure 1 illustrates the two primary configurations of EAHE systems,' but the manuscript as provided contains only a figure caption placeholder; no actual figure appears. If the figure is missing, it should be included or the reference should be removed.
  3. [Equations 1–8] The equations presented are standard exergy-balance and efficiency relations, but the citation 'reference [22–25]' is imprecise: reference [22] is a CFD study, and [23]–[25] are Ozgener and Ozgener papers. The authors should cite the specific sources from which each equation is drawn and clarify the notation (e.g., define all symbols such as ψ, ε₁, ε₂, ε₃, T₀, etc.).
  4. [Title and Abstract] The title promises a 'Comprehensive Review,' but the corpus covered is small and heavily skewed toward a narrow time window (1992–2013 for substantive EAHE studies) with a few 2024 entries that are not about EAHEs. The abstract's claim of serving as 'a comprehensive reference for researchers, engineers, and policymakers' should be tempered to match the actual scope.
  5. [References [28]–[46]] Even if the off-topic references were removed, the remaining reference list contains inconsistent formatting: incomplete author lists, missing DOIs, and two different citation styles (numbered and author–date). A uniform style should be applied.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the review uses standard textbook equations and its literature-synthesis claim is not a result derived from its inputs.

full rationale

This manuscript is a review, not an original derivation. The abstract's claim to 'systematically categorize and synthesize research on EAHEs into three primary areas' is an organizational assertion, not a mathematical result with an input-to-output chain. The equations in Section 3, Equations (1)-(8), are standard exergy balance, exergy destruction, efficiency, and COP relations presented as 'some of the mathematical relations utilized in these studies are briefly outlined [22–25]'; they are not fitted to data and are not derived from the review's conclusions. No parameter is fitted and later renamed a prediction. The large block of references [28]-[46] contains many papers unrelated to Earth-to-Air Heat Exchangers and several self-citations by the present authors, but these references are not used to derive any of the paper's claims or equations; at most, their presence undermines the asserted comprehensiveness of the literature review, which is a relevance and quality concern rather than circularity. There is no self-citation invoked as a load-bearing external theorem, no uniqueness argument imported from prior work, and no ansatz smuggled in via citation. Therefore, no circular step can be exhibited with the required specificity, and the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper contributes no original derivation, so the only axioms are standard thermodynamic relations and the paper's own organizing assumption about the literature. There are no fitted parameters or invented entities.

assumptions (3)
  • standard math Exergy balance equations (Eqs. 1-3) apply to EAHE systems.
    The paper lists these as the mathematical relations for analysis but does not derive them; they are standard first-law and exergy balances.
  • standard math Maximum COP for an ideal heat engine is given by Eq. (8), the Carnot COP.
    Quoted without derivation; standard thermodynamic result for reversible cycles.
  • domain assumption The EAHE literature can be cleanly divided into analytical, numerical, and exergoeconomic categories.
    The paper asserts this tripartite categorization without justifying it or specifying how each paper was assigned to a category.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Comprehensive Review of Analytical and Numerical Approaches in Earth-to-Air Heat Exchangers and Exergoeconomic Evaluations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QEMAYP6R

@misc{pith2026250208553,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Comprehensive Review of Analytical and Numerical Approaches in Earth-to-Air Heat Exchangers and Exergoeconomic Evaluations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QEMAYP6R}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.08553}
}
read the original abstract

In recent decades, Earth-to-Air Heat Exchangers (EAHEs), also known as underground air ducts, have garnered significant attention for their ability to provide energy-efficient cooling and heating solutions while maintaining a minimal environmental footprint. These systems leverage the relatively stable underground temperature to regulate indoor climates, reducing reliance on conventional heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) systems. This review systematically categorizes and synthesizes research on EAHEs into three primary areas: analytical, numerical, and exergoeconomic studies. Analytical approaches focus on developing theoretical models to predict thermal performance, while numerical simulations provide insights into system optimization and real-world applications. Exergoeconomic analyses, integrating thermodynamic efficiency with economic considerations, offer valuable perspectives on cost-effectiveness and long-term viability. By consolidating existing contributions across these domains, this study serves as a comprehensive reference for researchers, engineers, and policymakers seeking to enhance the design, implementation, and performance of EAHE systems. The findings emphasize the pivotal role of EAHEs in reducing energy consumption, lowering greenhouse gas emissions, and improving economic sustainability. Additionally, this review identifies key challenges, including soil thermal conductivity variations, moisture effects, and system integration with renewable energy sources, which require further investigation. By addressing these challenges, EAHEs can be further optimized to serve as a cornerstone in sustainable energy management, contributing to global efforts toward energy-efficient building solutions and climate change mitigation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.08553 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic Design of Open and Closed Systems [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Investigation of the Estimation Accuracy of 5 Different Numerical ODE Solvers on 3 Case Studies

    math.NA 2025-02 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    A comparison of Euler, Heun, midpoint, RK4, and ODE45 on three case studies claims model-dependent accuracy, but the evidence is inconsistent and not reproducible.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [19]

    Performance evaluation and life cycle cost analysis of earth to air heat exchanger integrated with adobe building for New Delhi composite climate

    A. Chel, G. N. Tiwari, " Performance evaluation and life cycle cost analysis of earth to air heat exchanger integrated with adobe building for New Delhi composite climate ", Energy and Buildings, Vol. 41, pp. 51-66, 2009

    work page 2009

  2. [28]

    G., Hasanzadeh, H., Asgari, F., Naeini, H

    Lonbar, A. G., Hasanzadeh, H., Asgari, F., Naeini, H. K., Shomali, R., & Asadi, S. (2024). Prioritizing Risk Factors in Media Entrepreneurship on Social Networks: Hybrid Fuzzy Z-Number Approaches for Strategic Budget Allocation and Risk Management in Advertising Construction Campaigns. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.18976

    work page arXiv 2024

  3. [46]

    R., Sharifi, A., McDaniel, D., & Leon, A

    Mahyawansi, P., Zanje, S. R., Sharifi, A., McDaniel, D., & Leon, A. S. (2024). Experimental investigation of storm sewer geyser using a large -scale setup. Physics of Fluids, 36(5)

    work page 2024

  4. [29]

    Asgari, F., Ghoreishi, S. G. A., Khajavi, M., Foozoni, A., Ala, A., & Lonbar, A. G. (2024). Data Analysis of Decision Support for Sustainable Welfare in The Presence of GDP Threshold Effects: A Case Study of Interactive Data Exploration. arXiv preprin t arXiv:2407.09711

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  5. [30]

    T., Javidi, A

    Sharifi, A., Beris, A. T., Javidi, A. S., Nouri, M. S., Lonbar, A. G., & Ahmadi, M. (2024). Application of artificial intelligence in digital twin models for stormwater infrastructure systems in smart cities. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 61, 102485

    work page 2024

  6. [31]

    Sharifi, A., Ahmadi, M., Badfar, H., & Hosseini, M. (2019). Modeling and sensitivity analysis of NOx emissions and mechanical efficiency for diesel engine. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26, 25190-25207

    work page 2019

  7. [32]

    G., Ahmadi, M., & Sharifi, A

    Reihanifar, M., Takallou, A., Taheri, M., Lonbar, A. G., Ahmadi, M., & Sharifi, A. (2024). Nanotechnology advancements in groundwater remediation: A comprehensive analysis of current research and future prospects. Groundwater for Sustainable Developme nt, 27, 101330

    work page 2024

  8. [33]

    Ahmadi, M., Gholizadeh Lonbar, A., Nouri, M., Sharifzadeh Javidi, A., Tarlani Beris, A., Sharifi, A., & Salimi -Tarazouj, A. (2024). Supervised multi -regional segmentation machine learning architecture for digital twin applications in coastal regions. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 28(2), 44

    work page 2024

  9. [34]

    Attari, M. Y. N., Ala, A., Ahmadi, M., & Jami, E. N. (2024). A highly effective optimization approach for managing reverse warehouse system capacity across diverse scenarios. Process Integration and Optimization for Sustainability, 8(2), 455-471

    work page 2024

  10. [35]

    G., Naeini, H

    Ahmadi, M., Lonbar, A. G., Naeini, H. K., Beris, A. T., Nouri, M., Javidi, A. S., & Sharifi, A. (2023). Application of segment anything model for civil infrastructure defect assessment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.12600

    arXiv 2023

  11. [36]

    R., Mahyawansi, P., & Leon, A

    Sharifi, A., Zanje, S. R., Mahyawansi, P., & Leon, A. S. Numerical Investigation of the Physical Mechanisms behind Geysers in Storm Sewer Systems: A Slug Analysis Based on a Computational Study of Geyser Eruptions. In World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2024 (pp. 835-845)

    work page 2024

  12. [37]

    Moghim, S., & Takallou, A. (2023). An integrated assessment of extreme hydrometeorological events in Bangladesh. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 37(7), 2541-2561

    work page 2023

  13. [40]

    Cao, S., Kasliwal, A., Reihanifar, M., Robusté, F., & Hansen, M. (2024). Effective Management of Airport Security Queues with Passenger Reassignment. In Proceedings of International Workshop on ATM/CNS 2024 International Workshop on ATM/CNS (pp. 141-146). Electronic Navigation Research Institute

    work page 2024

  14. [43]

    Reihanifar, M., & Naimi, S. (2018). Evaluation of road construction projects by value engineering approach as a tool for sustainability. International journal of ecosystems and ecology science (IJEES), 8(2), 339-346

    work page 2018

  15. [44]

    Reihanifar, M., & Naimi, S. (2016). Proje ve Maliyet Yonetimi Yontemleriyle Kalitenin ve Verimliligin Artirilmasinin İncelenmesi. Istanbul Aydin Univ. Derg, 8(29), 51-65

    work page 2016

  16. [38]

    Asadi, S., & Abedini, A. (2016). Numerical Study of Cooling Buildings with Cylindrical Roof Using Surface -to-AirHeat Exchanger. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Vibration, 7(1), 27-34

    work page 2016

  17. [12]

    Analytical model for heat transfer in an underground air tunnel

    M. Krarti, J. F. Kreider, " Analytical model for heat transfer in an underground air tunnel ", Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 37, No. 10, pp. 1561-1574, 1996

    work page 1996

  18. [15]

    Cucumo, S

    M. Cucumo, S. Cucumo, L. Montoro, A. Vulcano, " A one -dimensional transient analytical model for earth -to-air heat exchangers, taking into account condensation phenomena and thermal perturbation from the upper free surface as well as around the buried pipes ", International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 51, pp. 508 -516, 2008

    work page 2008

Show all 46 references
  1. [1]

    Use of Passive Solar Energy in Office

    J. Campbel, “Use of Passive Solar Energy in Office”, In: O’ Sullivan(ed), Passive Solar Energy in Buildings, The Watt Committee on Energy, 1988

    1988

  2. [2]

    The Influence of Orientation of Family and Guest Living Rooms on Electric Energy Consumption of Residential Buildings in Riyath

    A. S. Saeed, “The Influence of Orientation of Family and Guest Living Rooms on Electric Energy Consumption of Residential Buildings in Riyath”, Architectural Science Review, Vol. 40, pp. 97-104, 1997

    1997

  3. [3]

    Experimental Investigation of Solar Chimney Assist Bioclimatic Architecture

    S. K. Kumar, S. Siaha, N. K. Kumar, “Experimental Investigation of Solar Chimney Assist Bioclimatic Architecture”, Energy Conversion and Management, Vol. 39, No. (5-6), pp. 441-444, 1998

    1998

  4. [4]

    An Improved Design of Wind Towers for Natural Ventilation and Passive Cooling

    M. N. Bahadori, “An Improved Design of Wind Towers for Natural Ventilation and Passive Cooling”, Solar Energy،Vol. 35. No. 2, pp. 119-129, 1985

    1985

  5. [5]

    A review on the experimental and analytical analysis of earth to air heat exchanger (EAHE) Systems in Turkey

    L. Ozgener, “A review on the experimental and analytical analysis of earth to air heat exchanger (EAHE) Systems in Turkey”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 4483– 4490

    2011

  6. [6]

    Ground source heat pump case studies and utility programs

    Lienau PJ, Boyd TL, Rogers RL. Ground source heat pump case studies and utility programs. Klamath Falls, OR: Geo-Heat center; 1995.p.82

    1995

  7. [7]

    Ground source (Geothermal) heat pumps

    Lund JW. Ground source (Geothermal) heat pumps. Course on heating with geothermal energy: conventional and new schemes, Convener Paul Lienau, WGC 2000Short Courses Kazuno, Thoku District, Japan,8–10 June 2000, p.209–36

    2000

  8. [8]

    Ground source heat pumps: design of geothermal systems for commercial and institutional buildings

    Kavanaugh S, Rafferty K. Ground source heat pumps: design of geothermal systems for commercial and institutional buildings. Atlanta, CA: ASHRAE, Inc.; 1997.p.167

    1997

  9. [9]

    Specification of water wells

    Rafferty K. Specification of water wells. ASHRAE Transactions 001; 107:487–93

  10. [10]

    Groundwater heat pump systems: experience at two high schools

    Rafferty K. Groundwater heat pump systems: experience at two high schools. ASHRAE Transactions 1996; 102:922–8

    1996

  11. [11]

    Analysis of the accuracy and sensitivity of eight models predict the performance of Earth-to-Air Heat Exchanger

    A. Tzaferis, D. Liparakis, " Analysis of the accuracy and sensitivity of eight models predict the performance of Earth-to-Air Heat Exchanger ", Energy and Buildings, Vol. 18, pp. 35-43, 1992

    1992

  12. [13]

    Chung, P

    M. Chung, P. S. Jung, R. H. Rangl, " Semi-analytical solution for heat transfer from a buried pipe with convection on exposed surface “, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol. 42, pp. 3771-3789,1999

    1999

  13. [14]

    Thermo-hydraulic design of Earth-Air Heat Exchangers

    M. De paepe, A. Janssens, " Thermo-hydraulic design of Earth-Air Heat Exchangers ", Energy and Buildings, Vol. 35, pp. 389-397, 2003

    2003

  14. [16]

    The cooling potential of earth –air heat exchangers for domestic buildings in a desert climate

    F. Al -Ajmi, D.L. Loveday, V.I. Hanby, " The cooling potential of earth –air heat exchangers for domestic buildings in a desert climate ", Building and Environment, Vol. 41, pp. 235-244, 2006

    2006

  15. [17]

    Convective heat transfer prediction in large rectangular cross-sectional area Earth-to-Air Heat Exchangers

    J. Zhang, F. Haghighat, " Convective heat transfer prediction in large rectangular cross-sectional area Earth-to-Air Heat Exchangers ", Building and Environment, Vol. 44, pp. 1892-1898, 2009

    2009

  16. [18]

    Performance analysis of earth– pipe–air heat exchanger for winter heating

    V. Bansal, R. Misra, G. Das Agrawal, J. Mathur, " Performance analysis of earth– pipe–air heat exchanger for winter heating ", Energy and Buildings, Vol. 41, pp. 1151 - 1154, 2009

    2009

  17. [20]

    Experimental and numerical analysis of an earth–air heat exchanger

    J. Vaz, M. A. Sattler, E. D. dos Santos, L. A. Isoldi, " Experimental and numerical analysis of an earth–air heat exchanger ", Energy and Buildings, Vol. 43, pp. 2476-2482, 2011

    2011

  18. [21]

    Earth-to-air heat exchangers for Italian climates

    F. Ascione, L. Bellia, F. Minichiello, " Earth-to-air heat exchangers for Italian climates ", Renewable Energy, Vol. 36, pp. 2177-2188, 2011

    2011

  19. [22]

    ‘Derating Factor’ new concept for evaluating thermal performance of earth air tunnel heat exchanger: A transient CFD analysis

    V. Bansal, R. Misra, G. Das Agarwal, J. Mathur, " ‘Derating Factor’ new concept for evaluating thermal performance of earth air tunnel heat exchanger: A transient CFD analysis ", Applied Energy, Vol. 102, pp. 418- 426, 2013

    2013

  20. [23]

    Ozgener, L

    O. Ozgener, L. Ozgener, “Exergetic assessment of EAHEs for building heating in Turkey: A greenhouse case study “Energy Policy 38 (2010) 5141–5150

    2010

  21. [24]

    Ozgener, L

    O. Ozgener, L. Ozgener, “Exergoeconomic analysis of an underground air tunnel system for greenhouse cooling system “, international journal of refrigeration 33 (2010)995 – 1005

    2010

  22. [25]

    Ozgener, L

    O. Ozgener, L. Ozgener, “Energetic performance test of an underground air tunnel system for greenhouse heating “, Energy 35 (2010) 4079-4085

    2010

  23. [26]

    Ozgener, L

    O. Ozgener, L. Ozgener, “Determining the optimal design of a closed loop earth to air heat exchanger for greenhouse heating by using exergoeconomics “, Energy and Buildings 43 (2011) 960–965

    2011

  24. [27]

    Yildiz, O

    A. Yildiz, O. Ozgener, L. Ozgener, “Exergetic performance assessment of solar photovoltaic cell (PV) assisted earth to air heat exchanger (EAHE) system for solar greenhouse cooling “, Energy and Buildings 43 (2011) 3154–3160

    2011

  25. [39]

    T., & Danandeh Mehr, A

    Hussain, A., Reihanifar, M., Niaz, R., Albalawi, O., Maghrebi, M., Ahmed, A. T., & Danandeh Mehr, A. (2024). Characterizing Inter-Seasonal Meteorological Drought Using Random Effect Logistic Regression. Sustainability, 16(19), 8433

    2024

  26. [41]

    T., Abualigah, L., & Dąbrowska, D

    Reihanifar, M., Danandeh Mehr, A., Tur, R., Ahmed, A. T., Abualigah, L., & Dąbrowska, D. (2023). A new multi-objective genetic programming model for meteorological drought forecasting. Water, 15(20), 3602

    2023

  27. [42]

    M., Vazifehkhah Ghaffari, M

    Danandeh Mehr, A., Reihanifar, M., Alee, M. M., Vazifehkhah Ghaffari, M. A., Safari, M. J. S., & Mohammadi, B. (2023). VMD -GP: A New Evolutionary Explicit Model for Meteorological Drought Prediction at Ungauged Catchments. Water, 15(15), 2686

    2023

  28. [45]

    S., Yin, Z., & Sharifi, A

    Leon, A. S., Yin, Z., & Sharifi, A. (2024). A finite volume model for maintaining stationarity and reducing spurious oscillations in simulations of sewer system filling and emptying. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 62(3), 267-282

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.