Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 65 references

The low-frequency flattening of the radio spectrum of giant HII regions in M 101

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper reports that five of six giant H ii regions in the nearby spiral galaxy M 101 show a low-frequency flattening of their radio spectra below 100 MHz, confined to cores smaller than 1.5 kpc and attributable to free-free absorption…

desk verdict Useful first 54 MHz look at M 101's giant HII regions, but the 'significant flattening' in the abstract is not backed by the reported fits: the EM values are mostly within 1-2 sigma of zero and no significance test is given. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.08713 v1 pith:VXA76HHV submitted 2025-02-12 astro-ph.GA

L. Gajović , V. Heesen , M. Brüggen , H. W. Edler , B. Adebahr , T. Pasini , F. de Gasperin , A. Basu
show 5 more authors
M. Weżgowiec C. Horellou D.J. Bomans H. Dénes D. Vohl
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords low-frequencyradiocontinuumHIIregionsfree-freeabsorptionspectralflatteningM101LOFARemissionmeasurestarformationrateindicators
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to settle whether the radio spectra of giant H ii regions turn over below a few hundred MHz, and what causes it. Using LOFAR maps at 54 and 144 MHz, together with Apertif at 1370 MHz and a published VLA-plus-Effelsberg map at 4850 MHz, it finds that five of six bright H ii regions in M 101 show a spectral flattening, even an inverted 54-144 MHz spectral index, at their centres. The flattening is localised to a region smaller than 1.5 kpc and is only visible when the measurement aperture is smaller than about 45 arcseconds. The paper models the effect as free-free absorption by ionised gas with emission measures of roughly 5000 to 12000 pc $cm^{-6}$, corresponding to an optical depth of about 0.28 at 100 MHz. If correct, low-frequency radio surveys below 100 MHz need to account for this absorption when using radio continuum as an extinction-free star-formation-rate indicator.

What carries the argument

The analysis is carried by the free-free absorption optical depth $\tau_{\rm ff}=8.2\times10^{-2}\,\nu^{-2.1}\,T_e^{-1.35}\,{\rm EM}$ (with electron temperature $T_e=10^4$ K assumed) combined with a synchrotron power-law spectrum, either through the internal mixed-medium expression $S_\nu=S_0(\nu/\nu_0)^{\eta}(1-e^{-\tau_{\rm ff}})/\tau_{\rm ff}$ or the external screen expression $S_\nu=S_0(\nu/\nu_0)^{\eta}e^{-\tau_{\rm ff}}$. The emission measure ${\rm EM}=\int n_e^2\,ds$ is the fitted parameter that encodes how much ionised gas lies along the line of sight. The other load-bearing element is the aperture-scan method: flux densities are measured in circles from 30 to 60 arcseconds in diameter, and the flattening appears only in the smallest apertures, localising the absorbing gas to a core smaller than 1.5 kpc.

What would settle it

Use LOFAR international baselines to image NGC 5471 at 54 MHz with a beam of about 2 arcseconds; if the 54 MHz flux of the core still follows the power law extrapolated from 144 and 1370 MHz, the claimed flattening would be a beam-size or calibration artifact rather than free-free absorption.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that the low-frequency flattening seen in the radio spectra of giant H ii regions is real, concentrated in their cores, and caused by free-free absorption. It shows that five of the six bright H ii regions in M 101 have 54 MHz flux densities well below the power laws extrapolated from 144, 1370, and 4850 MHz, giving positive spectral indices between 54 and 144 MHz right at the centres. Fitting the spectra with free-free absorption models yields emission measures between roughly 5000 and 12000 pc $cm^{-6}$ for the internal model, about half that for the external screen, matching independent H-$\alpha$ estimates to within a factor of about two. The flattening disappears when the measurement aperture exceeds about 45 arcseconds, corresponding to 1.5 kpc at the distance of M 101, which the paper interprets as the size scale of the absorbing ionised gas. NGC 5447 is the exception and may consist of several smaller condensations that the current resolution cannot separate.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's central result rests on the assumption that the 54 MHz LOFAR map is photometrically reliable on the 20-30 arcsecond angular scale of the H ii region cores, so the measured flux deficit at 54 MHz is astrophysical and not a calibration, primary-beam, or diffuse-disc artifact.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The flattening is a small-aperture effect: measuring the same H ii regions in apertures larger than about 45 arcseconds dilutes it away, so coarser surveys will systematically miss it.
  • At 100 MHz the free-free absorption optical depth in the cores is about 0.28, so radio continuum measurements below 100 MHz need an absorption correction when used as extinction-free star-formation-rate indicators on kiloparsec scales.
  • Both the internal mixed-medium model and the external screen model reproduce the spectra, and the external model gives emission measures about a factor of two lower and closer to the values estimated from H-alpha.
  • Synchrotron self-absorption and cosmic-ray ionisation losses cannot reproduce the turnover, which is why the paper settles on free-free absorption as the explanation.
  • Detecting such flattening in other galaxies requires beams better than 45 arcseconds, which at the distance of M 101 corresponds to 1.5 kpc; more distant galaxies will need even higher resolution.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The internal-versus-external model degeneracy is not resolved by radio spectra alone; a direct test would be whether the absorbing gas is spatially coincident with the H ii region (internal) or offset in front of it (external), which sub-arcsecond continuum and recombination-line imaging could settle.
  • If unresolved substructure hides the NGC 5447 turnover, then current surveys may undercount flattened cores in distant galaxies, and the true fraction of giant H ii regions with strong low-frequency absorption could be higher than five out of six.
  • The same aperture-scan procedure could be applied to other nearby face-on spirals with very bright H ii regions to see whether core-localised free-free absorption is a general property of giant H ii regions or specific to M 101.
  • Because the integrated spectrum of M 101 shows no turnover, global galaxy spectra cannot be used to infer the presence of absorbing H ii region cores; this may explain earlier contradictory results from integrated surveys.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents new LOFAR 54 MHz and Apertif 1370 MHz maps of M 101 and combines them with published 144 MHz and 4850 MHz data to study the low-frequency radio spectra of six giant H II regions. The authors measure spectral indices between 54 and 144 MHz, find positive (inverted) indices at the centres of most selected regions, and fit two free-free absorption models (internal and external screen) to four-point SEDs. They report a significant low-frequency flattening at the centres of five out of six H II regions, with emission measures of roughly 5000 to 12000 pc cm^-6, localised within 1.5 kpc, and conclude that free-free absorption produces an optical depth of about 0.3 at 100 MHz in these cores.

Significance. If the central claim is correct, the paper would demonstrate that free-free absorption shapes the cores of giant H II regions below 100 MHz and that high resolution is required to detect such flattening, with implications for using radio continuum emission at low frequencies as an extinction-free star-formation indicator. The paper contains careful data processing: the new LOFAR LBA map is phase-shifted and direction-dependent calibrated, the integrated spectrum is checked against the literature, and background sources are used to validate small-scale flux. The comparison of internal versus external free-free absorption models and the independent H-alpha-based EM estimate are useful and clearly presented. However, the headline claim of a 'significant' flattening is not backed by a formal significance test, and the quoted parameter uncertainties often encompass zero absorption, so the statistical evidence is currently weaker than the abstract suggests.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 6 vs Abstract] The claim of a significant flattening in five out of six regions is not supported by the fitted parameters. For the internal model, the EMs are 5200 +/- 5200 (Centre), 6700 +/- 6100 (NGC 5455), 6600 +/- 4100 (NGC 5461), 4800 +/- 4600 (NGC 5462), and 12300 +/- 5300 pc cm^-6 (NGC 5471); only NGC 5471 exceeds 2 sigma, and the others are within 1.6 sigma of zero. Since EM = 0 corresponds to no free-free absorption, fits with EM consistent with zero are not evidence for flattening. No Delta-chi^2, F-test, or p-value is reported comparing the free-free absorption model to a pure power law, so the reader cannot verify that the 54 MHz flux densities are significantly below the power-law extrapolation. Please add a significance test for each region and aperture, and state the significance of the 54 MHz deficit relative to the power law.
  2. [Section 3.1, Section 4.1] The conclusions state that 'The spectral index between 54 and 144 MHz is negative in the very centres of the H II regions,' while the abstract states that it is 'inverted.' Since the paper interprets the low-frequency flattening as due to free-free absorption, which produces a positive (inverted) spectral index between 54 and 144 MHz, the conclusions sentence appears to be a typo. Please correct this and ensure that 'flattening,' 'turnover,' and 'inverted' are used consistently throughout, because the current wording obscures the direction of the effect.
  3. [Section 5.2, Fig. 10] The small-scale reliability of the 54 MHz map is checked with four background sources and the integrated spectrum, but these tests do not directly validate the 30-arcsecond apertures at the H II region centres. The spectral index map in Fig. 7 shows positive indices at the centres, but the paper does not assess whether these positive indices are significant given the 54 MHz noise (1700 microJy/beam) and the 2-sigma cutoff used to mask the maps. The reader cannot tell how many independent resolution elements are covered by the 'five out of six' claim. Please provide the 54 MHz signal-to-noise ratio at each region centre, or compute the spectral indices with a higher detection threshold and show how the positive-index pixels compare to the noise.
  4. [Section 4.2] The localisation claim (diameter smaller than 45 arcseconds) is based on the summed flux of the five regions as a function of aperture, but Fig. 10 shows no error bars and no statistical comparison between apertures. The text says that the flattening 'can not be detected' with diameters larger than 45 arcseconds, but this appears to be a visual claim. Please quantify the uncertainties in these aperture measurements and test whether the difference between the 30-arcsecond and 45-arcsecond spectra is significant.
minor comments (5)
  1. Table 2 lists a 10% flux density scale uncertainty for the 54 MHz LoLSS data, while the text for the 144 MHz LoTSS data says the uncertainty is 'below 10%' (Shimwell et al. 2022). Please harmonise the quoted uncertainties and state whether the 10% value for LoLSS is adopted from the survey papers or derived here.
  2. Equation (5) uses the relation EM = 5e17 F_Halpha / Omega without a derivation or explicit reference. Please add a citation and specify the assumed electron temperature, extinction correction, and the solid-angle definition, because these choices affect the comparison in Fig. 9.
  3. The sentence 'In most of the analysed H II regions the flux density at 54 MHz is significantly lower than it would be if the power law behaviour extended to lower frequencies' uses the word 'significantly' without a statistical test. Please rephrase or provide the test, because the fits in Table 4 do not by themselves demonstrate this significance.
  4. The discussion of NGC 5447 is speculative in attributing the absence of a turnover to multiple condensations. Consider stating explicitly that higher-resolution observations are needed to test this hypothesis, since the present data cannot distinguish it from other explanations.
  5. There are several typographical errors, including 'Effelesberg' in the abstract (should be 'Effelsberg'), 'mode precise' in Section 5.2 (should be 'more precise'), and 'preformed' in the conclusions (should be 'performed'). Please proofread the manuscript carefully.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the free-free absorption fits use standard published expressions, the EM values are compared against an independent H-alpha-based estimate, and the only self-citation is comparative or auxiliary.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The radio flux densities at 54, 144, 1370, and 4850 MHz are independent measurements, and the spectral flattening is identified directly from the SEDs before any model is fitted. The free-free absorption models (Eqs. 1 and 4) are standard published fitting functions (Tingay & de Kool 2003; Wills et al. 1997), with the optical depth relation (Eq. 2) taken from Brussaard & van de Hulst (1962); none of these are defined in terms of the M 101 result. The fitted EM values are not re-inserted as an input: Sect. 5.1 compares them to an independently estimated EM from H-alpha flux via Eq. (5), and the paper explicitly states that the H-alpha comparison cannot firmly distinguish the two models, which is an external benchmark rather than a circular validation. The only self-citation to the same group's prior M 51 study (Gajović et al. 2024) is used for comparison of EM magnitudes, for an auxiliary brightness-temperature argument against synchrotron self-absorption, and for a qualitative discussion of spectral curvature; none of these supplies a premise that forces the M 101 detection. The larger EM uncertainties and the absence of an explicit significance test relative to a pure power law, noted by the skeptic, are statistical-evidence concerns rather than circularity. No equation in the paper reduces the claimed flattening or EM to the fitted inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central result is an observational measurement that relies on standard free-free absorption physics and calibration assumptions. The only fitted quantities are the SED parameters (S0, eta, EM); no new physical entities are introduced. The main unproven premises are the applicability of the free-free absorption model, the assumed electron temperature, and the aperture isolation of the HII region cores.

free parameters (4)
  • Emission measure EM (internal model, per region) = Centre 5200 +/- 5200; NGC 5455 6700 +/- 6100; NGC 5461 6600 +/- 4100; NGC 5462 4800 +/- 4600; NGC 5471 12300 +/- 5300…
    Fitted parameter in Eq. 1 and 2; drives the free-free absorption turnover; values have large 1-sigma uncertainties.
  • Emission measure EM (external model, per region) = Centre 2500 +/- 2200; NGC 5455 3200 +/- 2600; NGC 5461 3000 +/- 1700; NGC 5462 2300 +/- 2000; NGC 5471 4900 +/- 1800…
    Same SED fit with the foreground-screen model (Eq. 4).
  • Absorption-free spectral index eta = -0.528 to -0.236 (internal); -0.529 to -0.235 (external)
    Fitted power-law slope before absorption; values are close for both models.
  • Flux normalization S0 = not tabulated
    Third free parameter in the SED fits; not reported in Table 4.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The free-free absorption model (Eq. 1 from Tingay and de Kool 2003) correctly describes the radio spectrum of the HII regions, assuming a thoroughly mixed thermal plasma and synchrotron-emitting cosmic-ray electrons.
    Used to fit the SEDs in Sect. 4.2; if the geometry is different, the inferred EM changes, though the detection of flattening may not.
  • standard math The free-free Gaunt factor approximation (Brussaard and van de Hulst 1962) applies at 54-4850 MHz.
    Used in Eq. 2 for the optical depth tau_ff.
  • domain assumption Electron temperature Te = 10^4 K in the HII regions.
    Assumed in Sect. 4.2; authors note Te between 9000 and 12000 K changes EM by at most 25 percent.
  • domain assumption At low frequencies, free-free emission is negligible compared to synchrotron emission, so only absorption of synchrotron radiation is modeled.
    Stated in Sect. 4.2; not quantitatively justified for all regions.
  • domain assumption The 30 arcsec aperture photometry isolates the HII region core without significant contamination from the diffuse disc.
    Needed for the SED fits and localization claim in Sects. 4.2 and 5.2.
  • domain assumption For the H-alpha EM comparison, a single 30 arcsec diameter is assumed for all HII regions because exact collecting areas are unknown.
    Used in Sect. 5.1 to compare radio and H-alpha emission measures; the authors acknowledge the uncertainty.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The low-frequency flattening of the radio spectrum of giant HII regions in M 101." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VXA76HHV

@misc{pith2026250208713,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The low-frequency flattening of the radio spectrum of giant HII regions in M 101},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VXA76HHV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.08713}
}
read the original abstract

In galaxies, the flattening of the spectrum at low radio frequencies below 300 MHz has been the subject of some debate. A turnover at low frequencies could be caused by multiple physical processes, which can yield new insights into the properties of the ionised gas in the interstellar medium. We investigate the existence and nature of the low-frequency turnover in the HII regions of M 101. We study the nearby galaxy M 101 using the LOw Frequency ARray (LOFAR) at frequencies of 54 and 144 MHz, Apertif at 1370 MHz, and published combined map from the Very Large Array (VLA) and Effelesberg telescope at 4850 MHz. The spectral index between 54 and 144 MHz is inverted at the centres of HII regions. We find a significant low-frequency flattening at the centres of five out of six HII regions that we selected for this study. The low frequency flattening in HII regions of M 101 can be explained with two different free-free absorption models. The flattening is localised in a region smaller than 1.5 kpc and can only be detected with high resolution (better than 45''). The detection of low frequency flattening has important consequences for using radio continuum observations below 100 MHz to measure extinction-free star-formation rates.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.08713 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Radio map of M 101 at 54 MHz observed with LOFAR LBA. The beam size is shown with the black ellipse in the bot￾tom left corner. cept for a circular region with 0.25◦ radius around M 101 from the visibility data using the source models and calibration so￾lutions found in the direction-dependent calibration carried out as part of LoLSS. We then phase-shifted the measurement sets of the individual observations and poin… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Integrated spectrum of M 101. The flux density measure￾ments from the maps used in this work (red) compared to litera￾ture flux density measurement, separated into those where bright background sources surrounding the galaxy are excluded (green) and are not excluded (blue). error dominates over the flux scale error in small regions that we study, so it was important to keep it as small as possible. All maps were the… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Spectra of four selected background sources. The spectra follows a power law as expected confirming that there are no flux density problems in our images at small scales. We additionally checked if our maps are reliable to study spectra in smaller regions. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Spectral index map of M 101 between 54 and 144 MHz. White areas below 2σ are excluded. The beam size is shown with the black ellipse in the bottom left corner. The spectra are shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Zoomed-in spectral index maps of H ii regions in M 101 between 54 and 144 MHz. The regions where the spectrum is measured (in Sect. 4.2) are indicated with black circles and the centres of the regions ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Spectra of the selected H ii regions in M 101. The solid lines of different opacity correspond to fits for the free-free absorption model (combined Eq. 1 and 2) in different areas within which the flux is measured, with diameters from 30 to 60′′ with a 10′′ step. The f…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Total flux density of H ii regions measured in increasing areas around the centre of the region. NGC 5447 is excluded. 7.5′′. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: NGC 5447 in Hα+continuum from the Hubble Legacy Archive2 . The pale green area was not observed. The red x marks the centre of the area in which we measured the spectrum. not inverted. There are only two patches with an inverted spec￾trum near the edges of the H ii re…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A., Adebahr, B., Connor, L., et al

    Adams, E. A., Adebahr, B., Connor, L., et al. 2020, in American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts, V ol. 235, American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts #235, 136.07

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    Adebahr, B., Krause, M., Klein, U., Heald, G., & Dettmar, R. J. 2017, A&A, 608, A29

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    2013, A&A, 555, A23

    Adebahr, B., Krause, M., Klein, U., et al. 2013, A&A, 555, A23

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    R., Viallefond, F., Mohan, N

    Anantharamaiah, K. R., Viallefond, F., Mohan, N. R., Goss, W. M., & Zhao, J. H. 2000, ApJ, 537, 613

    work page 2000

  5. [5]

    Basu, A., Mitra, D., Wadadekar, Y ., & Ishwara-Chandra, C. H. 2012, MNRAS, 419, 1136

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    2017, MNRAS, 471, 337

    Basu, A., Roychowdhury, S., Heesen, V ., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 471, 337

    work page 2017

  7. [7]

    M., Urbanik, M., Beck, R., & Han, J

    Berkhuijsen, E. M., Urbanik, M., Beck, R., & Han, J. L. 2016, A&A, 588, A114

    2016

  8. [8]

    Brown, L. W. 1973, ApJ, 180, 359

    work page 1973

Show all 65 references
  1. [9]

    Brussaard, P. J. & van de Hulst, H. C. 1962, Rev. Mod. Phys., 34, 507

    1962

  2. [10]

    2010, Astroparticle Physics, 33, 307

    Caprioli, D., Amato, E., & Blasi, P. 2010, Astroparticle Physics, 33, 307

    2010

  3. [11]

    Caswell, J. L. & Wills, D. 1967, MNRAS, 135, 231 Chy˙zy, K. T., Jurusik, W., Piotrowska, J., et al. 2018, A&A, 619, A36

    1967

  4. [12]

    J., Cotton, W

    Condon, J. J., Cotton, W. D., & Broderick, J. J. 2002, AJ, 124, 675

    2002

  5. [13]

    E., Elitzur, M., & Parra, R

    Conway, J. E., Elitzur, M., & Parra, R. 2018, ApJ, 865, 70

    2018

  6. [14]

    Corwin, H. G. 1995, NED Team Report, 1, 1 de Gasperin, F., Dijkema, T. J., Drabent, A., et al. 2019, A&A, 622, A5 de Gasperin, F., Edler, H. W., Williams, W. L., et al. 2023, A&A, 673, A165 de Gasperin, F., Williams, W. L., Best, P., et al. 2021, A&A, 648, A104 de Jong, M. L. ...

    1995

  7. [15]

    Dettmar, R. J. 1992, Fund. Cosmic Phys., 15, 143

    1992

  8. [16]

    Dodorico, S., Rosa, M., & Wampler, E. J. 1983, A&AS, 53, 97 Gajovi´c, L., Adebahr, B., Basu, A., et al. 2024, A&A, 689, A68

    1983

  9. [17]

    M., Gregorini, L., & Klein, U

    Gioia, I. M., Gregorini, L., & Klein, U. 1982, A&A, 116, 164

    1982

  10. [18]

    D., Engelbracht, C

    Gordon, K. D., Engelbracht, C. W., Rieke, G. H., et al. 2008, ApJ, 682, 336

    2008

  11. [19]

    1990, A&A, 238, 39

    Graeve, R., Klein, U., & Wielebinski, R. 1990, A&A, 238, 39

    1990

  12. [20]

    Green, D. A. 2014, Bulletin of the Astronomical Society of India, 42, 47

    2014

  13. [21]

    J., Miley, G

    Groeneveld, C., van Weeren, R. J., Miley, G. K., et al. 2022, A&A, 658, A9

    2022

  14. [22]

    J., et al

    Heesen, V ., Buie, E., I., Huff, C. J., et al. 2019, A&A, 622, A8

    2019

  15. [23]

    2022, A&A, 664, A83

    Heesen, V ., Staffehl, M., Basu, A., et al. 2022, A&A, 664, A83

    2022

  16. [24]

    Hippelein, H. H. 1986, A&A, 160, 374

    1986

  17. [25]

    2023, ApJ, 955, L8

    Hiramatsu, D., Tsuna, D., Berger, E., et al. 2023, ApJ, 955, L8

    2023

  18. [26]

    Hodge, P. W. 1969, ApJS, 18, 73

    1969

  19. [27]

    W., Gurwell, M., Goldader, J

    Hodge, P. W., Gurwell, M., Goldader, J. D., & Kennicutt, Robert C., J. 1990, ApJS, 73, 661

    1990

  20. [28]

    G., Walterbos, R

    Hoopes, C. G., Walterbos, R. A. M., & Bothun, G. D. 2001, ApJ, 559, 878

    2001

  21. [29]

    2018, ApJ, 854, 68

    Hu, N., Wang, E., Lin, Z., et al. 2018, ApJ, 854, 68

    2018

  22. [30]

    1991, A&A, 251, 442

    Hummel, E. 1991, A&A, 251, 442

    1991

  23. [31]

    M., et al

    Ignesti, A., Vulcani, B., Poggianti, B. M., et al. 2022, ApJ, 924, 64

    2022

  24. [32]

    P., Goss, W

    Israel, F. P., Goss, W. M., & Allen, R. J. 1975, A&A, 40, 421

    1975

  25. [33]

    Israel, F. P. & Kennicutt, R. C. 1980, Astrophys. Lett., 21, 1

    1980

  26. [34]

    Israel, F. P. & Mahoney, M. J. 1990, ApJ, 352, 30 Kapi´nska, A. D., Staveley-Smith, L., Crocker, R., et al. 2017, ApJ, 838, 68

    1990

  27. [35]

    C., Bresolin, F., & Garnett, D

    Kennicutt, Jr., R. C., Bresolin, F., & Garnett, D. R. 2003, ApJ, 591, 801

    2003

  28. [36]

    2018, A&A, 611, A55

    Klein, U., Lisenfeld, U., & Verley, S. 2018, A&A, 611, A55

    2018

  29. [37]

    Klein, U., Wielebinski, R., & Morsi, H. W. 1988, A&A, 190, 41

    1988

  30. [38]

    J., Jamrozy, M., & Croston, J

    Konar, C., Hardcastle, M. J., Jamrozy, M., & Croston, J. H. 2013, MNRAS, 430, 2137 Kuril’Chik, V . N. 1966, Soviet Ast., 10, 1

    2013

  31. [39]

    M., Oosterloo, T

    Kutkin, A. M., Oosterloo, T. A., Morganti, R., et al. 2023, A&A, 676, A37

    2023

  32. [40]

    Lacki, B. C. 2014, MNRAS, 444, L39

    2014

  33. [41]

    C., Thompson, T

    Lacki, B. C., Thompson, T. A., & Quataert, E. 2010, ApJ, 717, 1

    2010

  34. [42]

    V ., Lyskova, N., Zhang, C., et al

    Lal, D. V ., Lyskova, N., Zhang, C., et al. 2022, ApJ, 934, 170

    2022

  35. [43]

    2016, MNRAS, 456, 1723

    Li, J.-T., Beck, R., Dettmar, R.-J., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 456, 1723

    2016

  36. [44]

    2015, AJ, 149, 32

    Marvil, J., Owen, F., & Eilek, J. 2015, AJ, 149, 32

    2015

  37. [45]

    1997, A&A, 322, 19

    Niklas, S., Klein, U., & Wielebinski, R. 1997, A&A, 322, 19

    1997

  38. [46]

    A., Vedantham, H

    Oosterloo, T. A., Vedantham, H. K., Kutkin, A. M., et al. 2020, A&A, 641, L4

    2020

  39. [47]

    W., Br¨uggen, M., et al

    Pasini, T., Edler, H. W., Br¨uggen, M., et al. 2022, A&A, 663, A105

    2022

  40. [48]

    & Schlickeiser, R

    Pohl, M. & Schlickeiser, R. 1990, A&A, 239, 424

    1990

  41. [49]

    1991b, A&A, 252, 493 Ram´ırez-Olivencia, N., Varenius, E., P ´erez-Torres, M., et al

    Pohl, M., Schlickeiser, R., & Lesch, H. 1991b, A&A, 252, 493 Ram´ırez-Olivencia, N., Varenius, E., P ´erez-Torres, M., et al. 2022, A&A, 658, A4

    2022

  42. [50]

    D., van Weeren, R

    Roberts, I. D., van Weeren, R. J., Lal, D. V ., et al. 2024, A&A, 683, A11

    2024

  43. [51]

    Rogstad, D. H. & Shostak, G. S. 1971, A&A, 13, 99

    1971

  44. [52]

    & Pramesh Rao, A

    Roy, S. & Pramesh Rao, A. 2006, in Journal of Physics Conference Series, V ol. 54, 156–160

    2006

  45. [53]

    J., Teuben, P

    Sault, R. J., Teuben, P. J., & Wright, M. C. H. 1995, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 77, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems IV , ed. R. A. Shaw, H. E. Payne, & J. J. E. Hayes, 433

    1995

  46. [54]

    W., Hardcastle, M

    Shimwell, T. W., Hardcastle, M. J., Tasse, C., et al. 2022, A&A, 659, A1

    2022

  47. [55]

    Skillman, E. D. & Israel, F. P. 1988, A&A, 203, 226

    1988

  48. [56]

    J., et al

    Stein, M., Heesen, V ., Dettmar, R. J., et al. 2023, A&A, 670, A158

    2023

  49. [57]

    S., Schinnerer, E., Krause, M., et al

    Tabatabaei, F. S., Schinnerer, E., Krause, M., et al. 2017, ApJ, 836, 185

    2017

  50. [58]

    2018, A&A, 611, A87

    Tasse, C., Hugo, B., Mirmont, M., et al. 2018, A&A, 611, A87

    2018

  51. [59]

    Terlouw, J. P. & V ogelaar, M. G. R. 2015, Kapteyn Package, version 2.3, Kapteyn Astronomical Institute, Groningen, available from http://www. astro.rug.nl/software/kapteyn/

    2015

  52. [60]

    Tingay, S. J. & de Kool, M. 2003, AJ, 126, 723 van Haarlem, M. P., Wise, M. W., Gunst, A. W., et al. 2013, A&A, 556, A2 van Weeren, R. J., Williams, W. L., Hardcastle, M. J., et al. 2016, ApJS, 223, 2

    2003

  53. [61]

    E., Mart´ı-Vidal, I., et al

    Varenius, E., Conway, J. E., Mart´ı-Vidal, I., et al. 2016, A&A, 593, A86 V oelk, H. J. 1989, A&A, 218, 67 V oigtl¨ander, P., Kamphuis, P., Marcelin, M., Bomans, D. J., & Dettmar, R. J. 2013, A&A, 554, A133 V orontsov-Vel’Yaminov, B. A. & Arkhipova, V . P. 1962, Morphological ...

    2016

  54. [62]

    2021, MNRAS, 508, 4072 We˙zgowiec, M., Beck, R., Hanasz, M., et al

    Werhahn, M., Pfrommer, C., & Girichidis, P. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 4072 We˙zgowiec, M., Beck, R., Hanasz, M., et al. 2022, A&A, 664, A108

    2021

  55. [63]

    White, R. L. & Becker, R. H. 1992, ApJS, 79, 331

    1992

  56. [64]

    A., Pedlar, A., Muxlow, T

    Wills, K. A., Pedlar, A., Muxlow, T. W. B., & Wilkinson, P. N. 1997, MNRAS, 291, 517

    1997

  57. [65]

    S., Reddy, N

    Yun, M. S., Reddy, N. A., & Condon, J. J. 2001, ApJ, 554, 803 12 L. Gajovi´c et al.: The low-frequency flattening of the radio spectrum of giant H ii regions in M 101 Appendix A: Mask for the integrated spectrum 14h04m 03m 02m 54°35' 30' 25' 20' 15' 10' RA (J2000) DEC (J2000) ...

    1990

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.