Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 65 references

Pressure-Tuned Magnetism and Bandgap Modulation in Layered Fe-Doped CrCl3

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Pressure above 1.2 GPa eliminates the ferromagnetic component of Fe-doped CrCl3 and widens its optical bandgap, according to combined magnetization, optical, and DFT experiments.

desk verdict Interesting data undercut by a load-bearing internal contradiction: the DFT predicts AFM→FM, the experiments are read as FM→AFM, and the paper still claims agreement. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.09581 v1 pith:X2RAH5VK submitted 2025-02-13 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-el

Aya Ali , Govindaraj Lingannan , Lukas Gries , Md Ezaz Hasan Khan , Anas Abutaha , Kei Uemura , Masaki Mito , Vladislav Borisov
show 4 more authors
Anna Delin Olle Eriksson Ruediger Klingeler Mahmoud Abdel-Hafiez
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el
keywords CrCl3Fe-dopedpressuretuningmagneticphasecompetitionbandgapmodulationvanderWaalsmagnetsRamanspectroscopyGrüneisenanalysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that applying pressure to Fe-doped CrCl3—a layered van der Waals magnet—first strengthens ferromagnetic interlayer coupling and then, above about 1.2 GPa, eliminates the ferromagnetic component, leaving antiferromagnetic order stabilized. It also reports that the optical bandgap grows with pressure, from 1.48 eV near ambient to higher values, with a slowdown above about 6 GPa tied to an isostructural phase transition. The authors argue these experimental findings are consistent with density-functional-theory calculations comparing ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic interlayer stackings. If correct, the results make Fe-doped CrCl3 a pressure-tunable magnetic and optoelectronic material, relevant for sensors that exploit a delicate balance between two magnetic orders.

What carries the argument

The central object is the pressure-dependent enthalpy difference ΔH(P) between ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic interlayer stackings of CrCl3, computed with GGA+U (U = 3 eV, JH = 0.6 eV); this quantity is the theoretical handle on which magnetic phase is stable at a given pressure. Experimentally, the load-bearing tools are high-pressure magnetization (tracking the FM and AFM components), the Grüneisen and Ehrenfest analysis of c-axis thermal expansion (extracting uniaxial pressure derivatives of magnetic energy scales), and Raman plus photoluminescence spectroscopies (marking the isostructural phase transition and bandgap evolution).

What would settle it

Compute the FM/AFM enthalpy difference for Cr0.5Fe0.5Cl3 as a function of pressure; if the doped system's transition direction or pressure differs from undoped CrCl3 (for instance, FM stabilized at low pressure and destabilized above roughly 1 GPa), the asserted agreement between experiment and theory would fail. Alternatively, neutron or resonant X-ray diffraction under pressure could directly determine the magnetic structure and test whether the FM component truly disappears above 1.2 GPa.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that in Cr0.5Fe0.5Cl3 pressure acts as a continuous tuning knob for the competition between ferromagnetic (FM) and antiferromagnetic (AFM) interlayer interactions. At ambient pressure, magnetization shows two coexisting magnetic components, with the FM one dominating at low temperature and field; as pressure rises, the FM coupling is first enhanced, then collapses above 1.2 GPa, so that only antiferromagnetic order remains. Photoluminescence shows the optical bandgap increasing with pressure, with a reduced slope above about 6 GPa attributed to an isostructural phase transition, while Raman spectroscopy marks the same structural transition by the disappearance of the Ag3 mode near 10.75 GPa. Thermal expansion and Grüneisen analysis independently confirm competing FM and AFM energy scales, yielding uniaxial pressure dependencies of +7 K/GPa for the ferromagnetic correlation energy and −20 K/GPa for the Néel temperature. The authors state that these observations agree with DFT calculations, which place an AFM-to-FM interlayer stacking transition around 1 GPa.

Load-bearing premise

The paper's claim that experiment and theory agree rests on assuming that DFT results for undoped CrCl3, which predict an AFM-to-FM stacking transition near 1 GPa, apply to Fe-doped Cr0.5Fe0.5Cl3 even though the experiments are read as an FM-to-AFM crossover above 1.2 GPa.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The FM component of Fe-doped CrCl3 can be switched off by pressures above about 1.2 GPa at low temperature, providing a hydrostatic-pressure route to control magnetic order in a van der Waals magnet.
  • The optical bandgap of Cr0.5Fe0.5Cl3 rises monotonically with pressure to at least 14 GPa, unlike parent CrCl3 whose bandgap trend reverses near 10 GPa, so Fe doping stabilizes the bandgap response under compression.
  • The uniaxial pressure dependence of the Néel temperature is strongly negative (−20 K/GPa, or −143 %/GPa), indicating that c-axis strain is a much more sensitive control parameter than magnetic field for the antiferromagnetic order.
  • The coexistence of FM and AFM energy scales with opposite uniaxial pressure dependencies makes this material a candidate for cryogenic pressure-sensing devices.
  • The reversibility of the pressure-induced structural and electronic changes, with Raman modes and photoluminescence recovering on decompression, means the tuning is reusable rather than destructive.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Inference: the DFT comparison is performed on undoped CrCl3, but the paper's asserted agreement holds only if Fe doping preserves the sign of the interlayer-exchange pressure dependence; applying the paper's own logic that doping changes the magnetic phase behavior, the DFT result (AFM-to-FM near 1 GPa) actually opposes the experimental reading (FM fading above 1.2 GPa), so the agreement claim wou
  • Inference: a direct test of the claimed agreement would be to compute the FM/AFM enthalpy difference for Cr0.5Fe0.5Cl3 itself; the central claim stands or falls on whether the doped system shows an FM-to-AFM transition near 1.2 GPa rather than an AFM-to-FM one.
  • Inference: the bandgap behavior suggests Fe doping suppresses the bandgap reversal seen in pure CrCl3 near 10 GPa, hinting that doping could be used to engineer a monotonically pressure-tunable optoelectronic response in magnetic van der Waals crystals.
  • Inference: measuring magnetoresistance across 1.2 GPa, as the paper itself suggests for future work, should reveal a distinct anomaly if the FM-to-AFM crossover is real.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a combined experimental and theoretical study of Fe-doped CrCl3 (primarily Cr0.5Fe0.5Cl3) under pressure. Experiments include high-pressure Raman spectroscopy, photoluminescence (PL), magnetization under hydrostatic pressure, and uniaxial thermal expansion measurements. The authors report a pressure-induced increase of the optical bandgap, a ferromagnetic-like magnetization component that grows up to about 1.2 GPa and then disappears, and uniaxial pressure derivatives of the magnetic energy scales obtained from Ehrenfest and Grüneisen analyses. These results are compared with DFT calculations on undoped CrCl3, and the abstract and conclusions repeatedly state that the experimental findings agree with the DFT results, including an AFM-to-FM transition around 1 GPa predicted by theory.

Significance. If the central claim were correct, the paper would demonstrate pressure-tunable competition between ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic order in a doped van der Waals magnet, which would be of interest for pressure-tunable spintronic devices. The paper also contains useful experimental data: high-pressure Raman and PL on Fe-doped CrCl3, magnetization under pressure, and a dilatometry-based Grüneisen/Ehrenfest analysis that yields uniaxial pressure coefficients for the magnetic transitions. The DFT calculation uses fixed Hubbard parameters and is not fit to the pressure-dependent target curves, which is a methodological strength. However, the headline claim of experiment-theory agreement is directly contradicted by the manuscript's own results: the DFT enthalpy difference predicts an AFM-to-FM transition near 1 GPa, while the magnetization data are interpreted as a loss of the ferromagnetic component above 1.2 GPa (i.e., FM-to-AFM). The DFT bandgap also decreases with pressure while the PL bandgap increases. These are load-bearing inconsistencies, not presentational issues, and they undermine the paper's central conclusion.

major comments (3)
  1. [§III.F, Fig. 10b vs. §III.D, Figs. 5-6] The DFT enthalpy difference ΔH = H_AFM − H_FM in Fig. 10b crosses from negative to positive near 1 GPa, which the text correctly identifies as an AFM-to-FM transition. In contrast, the magnetization data in Figs. 5 and 6 are interpreted as a ferromagnetic-like component that grows up to 1.2 GPa and then vanishes, with stabilization of antiferromagnetic ordering above 1.2 GPa (see text after Fig. 6 and the abstract: "Above 1.2 GPa the FM component of the magnetism is gone"). These are opposite transition directions. The statement in §III.F that the AFM-to-FM transition around 1 GPa "is consistent with experimental observations" is therefore internally inconsistent with the experimental interpretation presented in the same paper.
  2. [§III.F vs. §III.C] The DFT calculations report that the bandgap decreases by 0.1 eV (FM) and 0.2 eV (AFM) between 0 and 5 GPa, while the PL measurements in §III.C show a progressive increase of the optical bandgap from 1.48 eV at 0.6 GPa up to 14.41 GPa. The paper makes no attempt to reconcile these opposite pressure dependences, even though the abstract claims general agreement between experiment and DFT. This is a second direct contradiction of the central claim.
  3. [§III.F and Fig. 10] The DFT calculations are performed for undoped CrCl3 (as stated in the Fig. 10 caption: "undoped CrCl3"), while the high-pressure experiments are performed on Cr0.5Fe0.5Cl3. The manuscript assumes that the pressure dependence of the interlayer magnetism is transferable from undoped to 50% Fe-doped material, but this assumption is not justified. In fact, §III.C argues that Fe doping changes the magnetic behavior under pressure compared to the parent compound (absence of the bandgap switching seen in undoped CrCl3). The comparison between theory and experiment therefore requires either calculations for the doped composition or an explicit argument for why the sign of the pressure effect is unaffected by 50% Fe substitution.
minor comments (6)
  1. [§III.F, figure callouts] The text refers to the enthalpy difference plot as "Figure 8b" and "Fig. 8," but Figure 8 shows the thermal expansion data; the enthalpy plot is actually Figure 10b. The figure numbering should be corrected throughout.
  2. [§III.F, text near Fig. 10] The sentence "The geometry of the CrI3 system was obtained from total energy (or force) minimization using DFT" should refer to CrCl3, not CrI3.
  3. [§III.D, figures] The text says "Figure 5(a) shows the magnetization data of CrCl3," but the measurements are on Fe-doped CrCl3; also, the text mentions Cr0.6Fe0.4Cl3 in connection with Fig. 4 while the figure caption says Cr0.5Fe0.5Cl3. Please make the sample compositions consistent.
  4. [§III.B vs. Conclusions] The Ag3 Raman mode is reported to disappear at 10.75 GPa in §III.B but at 9.9 GPa in the Conclusions. The correct value should be identified and used consistently.
  5. [§III.E, Fig. 9] The notation for the Grüneisen ratio is inconsistent: the text defines γc = αc/cp, but the Fig. 9(c) caption says "Grüneisen ratio c p/αc." Please align the notation.
  6. [§III.F, text after Fig. 10] The fragment "experimental results of our work" appears without a verb in the sentence following the description of the enthalpy difference; the sentence should be completed or removed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the core DFT pressure trends and Ehrenfest/Grüneisen coefficients are derived from independent first-principles calculations and standard thermodynamic identities, not from the target observables.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. The DFT calculations are first-principles VASP GGA+U runs; U = 3 eV and JH = 0.6 eV are calibrated to the ambient band gap and Cr magnetic moment and then kept fixed for all pressures, so the pressure-dependent enthalpy difference ΔH(P) = H_AFM − H_FM and the computed gap trends are genuine predictions rather than fits to the magnetization or PL pressure data. The Ehrenfest relation ∂T_N/∂p_c = T_N V_m Δα_c/Δc_p and the Grüneisen relation ∂ln ε/∂p_i = V_m α_i/c_p are standard thermodynamic identities applied to measured Δα_c and Δc_p, so the derived uniaxial pressure coefficients do not reduce to their own inputs. Self-citations occur mainly in comparisons with prior CrI3 and CrCl3 work, but those comparisons are used as external empirical benchmarks rather than as load-bearing uniqueness or ansatz justifications. The paper's claim that DFT 'agrees' with experiment is weakened by an internal sign inconsistency: the DFT section states an AFM-to-FM interlayer transition around 1 GPa, while the experimental narrative says the FM component is gone above 1.2 GPa. That is a contradiction between independent calculations and measurements, not a circular reduction of an output to an input. No specific circular step can be quoted from the paper.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central pressure-magnetism result rests on DFT energy differences that depend on manually chosen U and JH, on the assumption that undoped CrCl3 DFT describes Fe-doped samples, and on the identification of PL peak maxima as bandgap values. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • U (Hubbard parameter) = 3 eV
    Chosen in GGA+U to provide a reasonable band gap and Cr magnetic moment; it directly affects the DFT enthalpy difference between AFM and FM stackings that underlies the claimed transition pressure.
  • JH (Hund exchange) = 0.6 eV
    Chosen with U to reproduce the insulating character and magnetic moment; kept fixed at all pressures, so it is an input not constrained by the pressure data.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption GGA+U (PBE) with U=3 eV and JH=0.6 eV yields reliable relative stabilities of AFM and FM interlayer stackings in CrCl3
    Invoked in Section III.F to compute the enthalpy difference; no benchmark against higher-level theory or experiment for the pressure dependence.
  • domain assumption The PL peak maximum can be used as a measure of the optical bandgap of an indirect-gap semiconductor
    Used in Section III.C to convert PL spectra to a bandgap value, without fitting to a Tauc or Elliott model.
  • ad hoc to paper Phonon contributions to specific heat at TN are negligible (greater than 90 percent magnetic)
    Stated in Section III.E based on isostructural analogs, to justify using total Grüneisen scaling for magnetic analysis.
  • domain assumption Fe doping at x=0.5 does not alter the lattice symmetry appreciably, so Raman modes can be assigned by comparison to undoped CrCl3
    Used in Section III.A; supported by the absence of large Raman shifts but not by structure refinement.
  • domain assumption Pressure media (silicon oil for Raman/PL, Apiezon J oil for magnetization) remain hydrostatic over the studied pressure ranges
    Assumed in Sections II and III; non-hydrostaticity could affect the alleged isostructural transition pressure.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Pressure-Tuned Magnetism and Bandgap Modulation in Layered Fe-Doped CrCl3." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/X2RAH5VK

@misc{pith2026250209581,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Pressure-Tuned Magnetism and Bandgap Modulation in Layered Fe-Doped CrCl3},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/X2RAH5VK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.09581}
}
read the original abstract

We explore the structural, magnetic, vibrational and optical band gap properties under varying pressures. By integrating first-principles calculations with experimental techniques, including Raman spectroscopy, photoluminescence (PL), uniaxial pressure studies (thermal expansion), and magnetization measurements, we unveil the intricate pressure-induced transformations in Fe-doped CrCl3, shedding light on its structural, electronic, and magnetic evolution. At ambient pressure, Raman spectra confirm all expected Raman-active modes, which exhibit blue shifts with increasing pressure. The PL measurements demonstrate an optical bandgap of 1.48 eV at ~0.6 GPa, with a progressive increase in the bandgap under pressure, transitioning slower above 6 GPa due to an isostructural phase transition. Magnetization results under pressure shows two competing magnetic components (FM and AFM) at ambient conditions, where at the lowest temperature and applied field, the FM component dominates. The presence of competing FM and AFM energy scales is confirmed by Grueneisen analysis of the thermal expansion and their uniaxial pressure dependence is determined. The experimental findings agree with theoretical results based on Density functional theory (DFT). In the experiments, we observe a pressure-enhanced ferromagnetic interlayer coupling that is followed by the stabilization of antiferromagnetic ordering, due to weakened direct interlayer interactions. Above 1.2 GPa the FM component of the magnetism is gone in the experimental observations, which is also in good agreement with DFT based theory. The findings reported here underscore the potential of CrCl3 for use in pressure-tunable magnetic and optoelectronic applications, where, e.g., the delicate balance between FM and AFM configurations could have potential for sensor applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.09581 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Measured Raman spectra of FexCrCl3 (x = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5) samples under ambient conditions using a 532 nm laser source. By systematically varying the Fe content (x = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5), we aim to uncover the role of dopant concentration in tuning the phononic and electronic properties of CrCl3. On the other hand, hydrostatic pressure provides a complementary approach by compressing the lattice u… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. (a). The pressure-induced shifts with the rate of 4.85 cm￾1/GPa (Ag1), 2.17 cm-1/GPa (Ag2), 1.18 cm-1/GPa (Ag4), 3.10 cm-1/GPa (Ag5) and 4.85 cm-1/GPa (Ag6) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. (a) shows the high-pressure photoluminescence (PL) spectra of Fe-doped CrCl3 (x=0.5), while [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: a) crystal structure of AFM-ordered undoped CrCl3 in the hexagonal setting, b) pressure-dependence of the enthalpy difference between the AFM and FM phases of CrCl3 indicating an AFM-FM transition at around 1 GPa. part of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films

    Novoselov KS, Geim AK, Morozov SV, Jiang DE, Zhang Y, Dubonos SV, Grigorieva IV, Firsov AA. Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films. science. 2004 , 306(5696), 666-9. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1102896

    doi:10.1126/science.1102896 2004

  2. [2]

    On the origin of magnetic anisotropy in two dimensional CrI3

    Lado JL, Fernández -Rossier J. On the origin of magnetic anisotropy in two dimensional CrI3. 2D Materials. 2017 , 4(3), 035002. https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1583/aa75ed

    doi:10.1088/2053-1583/aa75ed 2017

  3. [3]

    Non-van der Waals quasi -2D materials; recent advances in synthesis, emergent properties and applications

    Balan AP, Puthirath AB, Roy S, Costin G, Oliveira EF, Saadi MA, Sreepal V, Friedrich R, Serles P, Biswas A, Iyengar SA. Non-van der Waals quasi -2D materials; recent advances in synthesis, emergent properties and applications. Materials Today. 2022 , 58, 164-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2022.07.007

    doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2022.07.007 2022

  4. [4]

    Engineering graphene and TMDs based van der Waals heterostructures for photovoltaic and photoelectrochemical solar energy conversion

    Li C, Cao Q, Wang F, Xiao Y, Li Y, Delaunay JJ, Zhu H. Engineering graphene and TMDs based van der Waals heterostructures for photovoltaic and photoelectrochemical solar energy conversion. Chemical Society Reviews. 2018 , 47(13), 4981-5037. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CS00067K

    work page doi:10.1039/c8cs00067k 2018

  5. [5]

    Emerging van der Waals junctions based on TMDs materials for advanced gas sensors

    Zheng W, Liu X, Xie J, Lu G, Zhang J. Emerging van der Waals junctions based on TMDs materials for advanced gas sensors. Coordination Chemistry Reviews. 2021 , 447, 214151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2021.214151

    work page arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    Tunable optical properties of 2D materials an d their applications

    Ma Q, Ren G, Xu K, Ou JZ. Tunable optical properties of 2D materials an d their applications. Advanced Optical Materials. 2021, 9(2), 2001313. https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.202001313

    doi:10.1002/adom.202001313 2021

  7. [7]

    Van der Waals Heterostructures for Photoelectric, Memory, and Neural Network Applications

    Xu H, Xue Y, Liu Z, Tang Q, Wang T, Gao X, Qi Y, Chen YP, Ma C, Jiang Y. Van der Waals Heterostructures for Photoelectric, Memory, and Neural Network Applications. Small Science. 2024, 4(4), 2300213. https://doi.org/10.1002/smsc.202300213

    work page doi:10.1002/smsc.202300213 2024

  8. [8]

    2D layered noble metal dichalcogenides (Pt, Pd, Se, S) for electronics and energy applications

    Chen E, Xu W, Chen J, Warner JH. 2D layered noble metal dichalcogenides (Pt, Pd, Se, S) for electronics and energy applications. Materials Today Advances. 2020 , 7, 100076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtadv.2020.100076

    work page arXiv 2020

Show all 65 references
  1. [9]

    Cleavable magnetic materials from van der Waals layered transition metal halides and chalcogenides

    McGuire MA. Cleavable magnetic materials from van der Waals layered transition metal halides and chalcogenides. Journal of Applied Physics. 2020 , 128(11). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0023729

    2020 doi

  2. [10]

    Van der Waals heterostructures

    Castellanos-Gomez A, Duan X, Fei Z, Gutierrez HR, Huang Y, Huang X, Quereda J, Qian Q, Sutter E, Sutter P. Van der Waals heterostructures. Nature Reviews Methods Primers. 2022 , 2(1),

    2022

  3. [11]

    A review on two-dimensional (2D) magnetic materials and their potential applications in spintronics and spin -caloritronic

    Elahi E, Dastgeer G, Nazir G, Nisar S, Bashir M, Qureshi HA, Kim DK, Aziz J, Aslam M, Hussain K, Assiri MA. A review on two-dimensional (2D) magnetic materials and their potential applications in spintronics and spin -caloritronic. Computational Materials Science. 2022 , 213, ...

    2022

  4. [12]

    The magnetic genome of two-dimensional van der Waals materials

    Wang QH, Bedoya -Pinto A, Blei M, Dismukes AH, Hamo A, Jenkins S, Koperski M, Liu Y, Sun QC, Telford EJ, Kim HH. The magnetic genome of two-dimensional van der Waals materials. ACS nano. 2022 , 16(5), 6960-7079. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c09150

    2022 doi

  5. [13]

    Layer-dependent ferromagnetism in a van der Waals crystal down to the monolayer limit

    Huang B, Clark G, Navarro-Moratalla E, Klein DR, Cheng R, Seyler KL, Zhong D, Schmidgall E, McGuire MA, Cobden DH, Yao W. Layer-dependent ferromagnetism in a van der Waals crystal down to the monolayer limit. Nature. 2017 , 546(7657), 270-3. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature22391

    2017 doi

  6. [14]

    Probing magnetism in 2D materials at the nanoscale with single-spin microscopy

    Thiel L, Wang Z, Tschudin MA, Rohner D, Gutiérrez -Lezama I, Ubrig N, Gibertini M, Giannini E, Morpurgo AF, Maletinsky P. Probing magnetism in 2D materials at the nanoscale with single-spin microscopy. Science. 2019 , 364(6444), 973-6. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav6926

    2019 doi

  7. [15]

    Theoretical studies on electronic, m agnetic and optical properties of two dimensional transition metal trihalides

    Basak K, Ghosh M, Chowdhury S, Jana D. Theoretical studies on electronic, m agnetic and optical properties of two dimensional transition metal trihalides. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter. 2023, 35(23), 233001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/acbffb

    2023 doi

  8. [16]

    Absence of ferromagnetism or antiferromagnetism in one-or two-dimensional isotropic Heisenberg models

    Mermin ND, Wagner H. Absence of ferromagnetism or antiferromagnetism in one-or two-dimensional isotropic Heisenberg models. Physical Review Letters. 1966 , 17(22), 1133. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.17.1133

    1966 doi

  9. [17]

    Enhancing ferromagnetism and tuning electronic properties of CrI3 monolayers by adsorption of transition -metal atoms

    Yang Q, Hu X, Shen X, Krasheninnikov AV, Chen Z, Sun L. Enhancing ferromagnetism and tuning electronic properties of CrI3 monolayers by adsorption of transition -metal atoms. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. 2021 , 13(18), 21593-601. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c01701

    2021 doi

  10. [18]

    Arneth, M

    J. Arneth, M. Jonak, S. Spachmann, M. Abdel-Hafiez, Y. O. Kvashnin, and R. Klingeler, Uniaxial pressure effects in the two- dimensional van der Waals ferromagnet CrI3, Phys. Rev. B 105, L060404 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.105.L060404

    2022 doi

  11. [20]

    M Jonak, E Walendy, J Arneth, Mahmoud Abdel -Hafiez, R Klingeler, Low -energy magnon excitations and emerging anisotropic nature of short -range order in CrI3, Phys. Rev. B 106, 214412 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.106.214412

    2022 doi

  12. [21]

    Coupling of crystal structure and magnetism in the layered, ferromagnetic insulator CrI3

    McGuire MA, Dixit H, Cooper VR, Sales BC. Coupling of crystal structure and magnetism in the layered, ferromagnetic insulator CrI3. Chemistry of Materials. 2015 , 27(2), 612-20. https://doi.org/10.1021/cm504242t

    2015 doi

  13. [22]

    Thickness - dependent magnetic order in CrI3 single crystals

    Liu Y, Wu L, Tong X, Li J, Tao J, Zhu Y, Petrovic C. Thickness - dependent magnetic order in CrI3 single crystals. Scientific Reports. 2019, 9(1), 13599. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-50000-x 11

    2019 doi

  14. [23]

    Direct photoluminescence probing of ferromagnetism in monolayer two-dimensional CrBr3

    Zhang Z, Shang J, Jiang C, Rasmita A, Gao W, Yu T. Direct photoluminescence probing of ferromagnetism in monolayer two-dimensional CrBr3. Nano letters. 2019 , 19(5), 3138-42. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b00553

    2019 doi

  15. [24]

    Spin caloritronics in a CrBr 3-based magnetic van der Waals heterostructure

    Liu T, Peiro J, de Wal DK, Leutenantsmeyer JC, Guimarães MH, van Wees BJ. Spin caloritronics in a CrBr 3-based magnetic van der Waals heterostructure. Physical Review B. 2020 , 101(20), 205407. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.205407

    2020 doi

  16. [25]

    Atomically thin CrCl3: an in -plane layered antiferromagnetic insulator

    Cai X, Song T, Wilson NP, Clark G, He M, Zhang X, Taniguchi T, Watanabe K, Yao W, Xiao D, McGuire MA. Atomically thin CrCl3: an in -plane layered antiferromagnetic insulator. Nano letters. 2019 , 19(6), 3993-8. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b01317

    2019 doi

  17. [26]

    Pressure -driven switching of magnetism in layered CrCl 3

    Ahmad AS, Liang Y, Dong M, Zhou X, Fang L, Xia Y, Dai J, Yan X, Yu X, Dai J, Zhang GJ. Pressure -driven switching of magnetism in layered CrCl 3. Nanoscale. 2020 , 12(45), 22935-

    2020

  18. [27]

    Magnetic behavior and spin-lattice coupling in cleavable van der Waals layered CrCl 3 crystals

    McGuire MA, Clark G, Kc S, Chance WM, Jellison Jr GE, Cooper VR, Xu X, Sales BC. Magnetic behavior and spin-lattice coupling in cleavable van der Waals layered CrCl 3 crystals. Physical Review Materials. 2017 , 1(1), 014001. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.1.014001

    2017 doi

  19. [28]

    Antiferromagnetism

    Anderson PW. Antiferromagnetism. Theory of superexchange interaction. Physical Review. 1950 , 79(2), 350. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.79.350

    1950 doi

  20. [29]

    Theory of the role of covalence in the perovskite-type manganites [La, M (II)]MnO3

    Goodenough JB. Theory of the role of covalence in the perovskite-type manganites [La, M (II)]MnO3. Physical Review. 1955, 100(2), 564. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.100.564

    1955 doi

  21. [30]

    Effect of hydrostatic pressure on ferromagnetism in two -dimensional CrI 3

    Mondal S, Kannan M, Das M, Govindaraj L, Singha R, Satpati B, Arumugam S, Mandal P. Effect of hydrostatic pressure on ferromagnetism in two -dimensional CrI 3. Physical Review B. 2019, 99(18), 180407. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.180407

    2019 doi

  22. [31]

    Kvashnin, Johan Hellsvik, and Anna Delin, Spin -lattice couplings in two - dimensional CrI3 from first -principles computations Phys

    Banasree Sadhukhan, Anders Bergman, Yaroslav O. Kvashnin, Johan Hellsvik, and Anna Delin, Spin -lattice couplings in two - dimensional CrI3 from first -principles computations Phys. Rev. B 105, 104418 (2022) . https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.105.104418

    2022 doi

  23. [32]

    2D materials and heterostructures a t extreme pressure

    Zhang L, Tang Y, Khan AR, Hasan MM, Wang P, Yan H, Yildirim T, Torres JF, Neupane GP, Zhang Y, Li Q. 2D materials and heterostructures a t extreme pressure. Advanced science. 2020, 7(24), 2002697. https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202002697

    2020 doi

  24. [33]

    Exotic magnetic and electronic properties of layered CrI 3 single crystals under high pressure

    Ghosh A, Singh D, Aramaki T, Mu Q, Borisov V, Kvashnin Y, Haider G, Jonak M, Chareev D, Medvedev SA, Klingeler R. Exotic magnetic and electronic properties of layered CrI 3 single crystals under high pressure. Physical Review B. 2022 , 105(8), L081104. https://doi.org/10.1103/...

    2022 doi

  25. [34]

    Structural, magnetic and vibrational properties of van der Waals ferromagnet CrBr3 at high pressure

    Lis O, Kozlenko D, Kichanov S, Lukin E, Zel I, Savenko B. Structural, magnetic and vibrational properties of van der Waals ferromagnet CrBr3 at high pressure. Materials. 2023, 16(1) 454. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16010454

    2023 doi

  26. [35]

    Pressure -driven structural phase transitions and metallization in the two-dimensional ferromagnetic semiconductor CrBr3

    Hong M, Dai L, Hu H, Zhang X, Li C, He Y. Pressure -driven structural phase transitions and metallization in the two-dimensional ferromagnetic semiconductor CrBr3. Dalton Transactions. 2023 , 52(21), 7290-301. https://doi.org/10.1039/D3DT00899A

    2023 doi

  27. [36]

    Electronic structure and magnetic exchange interactions of Cr -based van der Waals ferromagnets

    Fumega AO, Blanco -Canosa S, Babu -Vasili H, Gargiani P, Li H, Zhou JS, Rivadulla F, Pardo V. Electronic structure and magnetic exchange interactions of Cr -based van der Waals ferromagnets. A comparative study between CrBr3 and Cr2Ge2Te6. Journal of Materials Chemistry C. 202...

    2020 doi

  28. [37]

    Pressure dependent magnetic properties on bulk CrBr3 single crystals

    Olmos R, Alam S, Chang PH, Gandha K, Nlebedim IC, Cole A, Tafti F, Zope RR, Singamaneni S R. Pressure dependent magnetic properties on bulk CrBr3 single crystals. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2022 , 911, 165034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.165034

    2022

  29. [38]

    Pressure -induced structural phase transition and metallization of CrCl3 under different hydrostatic environments up to 50.0 GPa

    Hong M, Dai L, Hu H, Zhang X, Li C, He Y. Pressure -induced structural phase transition and metallization of CrCl3 under different hydrostatic environments up to 50.0 GPa. Inorganic Chemistry. 2022, 61(12), 14001 4852-64. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c03486

    2022 doi

  30. [39]

    Magnetic and magnetocaloric properties of layered van der Waals CrCl3

    Mondal S, Midya A, Patidar MM, Ganesan V, Mandal P. Magnetic and magnetocaloric properties of layered van der Waals CrCl3. Applied Physics Letters. 2020 Aug 31;117(9). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0019985

    2020 doi

  31. [40]

    Growth of high- quality CrI3 single crystals and engineering of its magnetic properties via V and Mn doping

    Pan S, Bai Y, Tang J, Wang P, You Y, Xu G, Xu F. Growth of high- quality CrI3 single crystals and engineering of its magnetic properties via V and Mn doping. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2022, 908, 164573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.164573

    2022

  32. [41]

    Doping enhanced ferromagnetism and induced half -metallicity in CrI3 monolayer

    Wang H, Fan F, Zhu S, Wu H. Doping enhanced ferromagnetism and induced half -metallicity in CrI3 monolayer. Europhysics Letters. 2016 , 114(4), 47001. https://doi.org/10.1209/0295- 5075/114/47001

    2016 doi

  33. [42]

    Topological half-metallic features in alkali metal doped CrCl3 monolayers

    Wang F, Zhang Y, Yang W, Zhang J, Zhang H, Xu X. Topological half-metallic features in alkali metal doped CrCl3 monolayers. Physical Review B. 2023 , 107(17), 174405. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.174405

    2023 doi

  34. [43]

    High -temperature and multichannel quantum anomalous Hall effect in pristine and alkali – metal-doped CrBr 3 monolayers

    Zhang H, Yang W, Ning Y, Xu X. High -temperature and multichannel quantum anomalous Hall effect in pristine and alkali – metal-doped CrBr 3 monolayers. Nanoscale. 2020 , 12(26), 13964-

    2020

  35. [44]

    https://doi.org/10.1039/d0nr04325g

    doi

  36. [45]

    Itinerant ferromagnetism in van der Waals Fe 5− x Ge Te 2 crystals above room temperature

    Zhang H, Chen R, Zhai K, Chen X, Caretta L, Huang X, Chopdekar RV, Cao J, Sun J, Yao J, Birgeneau R. Itinerant ferromagnetism in van der Waals Fe 5− x Ge Te 2 crystals above room temperature. Physical Review B. 2020 , 102(6), 064417. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.102.064417

    2020 doi

  37. [46]

    Fe3GeTe2 and Ni3GeTe2 –two new layered transition‐metal compounds: crystal structures, HRTEM investigations, and magnetic and electrical properties

    Deiseroth HJ, Aleksandrov K, Reiner C, Kienle L, Kremer RK. Fe3GeTe2 and Ni3GeTe2 –two new layered transition‐metal compounds: crystal structures, HRTEM investigations, and magnetic and electrical properties. European Journal of Inorganic 12 Chemistry, 2006, 1561-1567. https:/...

    2006 doi

  38. [47]

    X‐ray diffraction and nuclear quadrupole resonance studies of chromium trichloride

    Morosin B, Narath A. X‐ray diffraction and nuclear quadrupole resonance studies of chromium trichloride. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 1964, 40(7), 1958-67. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1725428

    1964 doi

  39. [48]

    Calculations of the electronic levels, spin -Hamiltonian parameters and vibrational spectra for the CrCl3 layered crystals

    Avram CN, Gruia AS, Brik MG, Barb AM. Calculations of the electronic levels, spin -Hamiltonian parameters and vibrational spectra for the CrCl3 layered crystals. Physica B: Condensed Matter. 2015 , 478, 31-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physb.2015.08.025

    2015 doi

  40. [49]

    The vibrational spectrum of MCl3 ( M= Al, Cr and Fe)

    Kanesaka I, Kawahara H, Yamazaki A, Kawai K. The vibrational spectrum of MCl3 ( M= Al, Cr and Fe). Journal of molecular structure. 1986 , 146:41-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022- 2860(86)80280-0

    1986 doi

  41. [50]

    Magnetic order-induced polarization anomaly of Raman scattering in 2D magnet CrI3

    Zhang Y, Wu X, Lyu B, Wu M, Zhao S, Chen J, Jia M, Zhang C, Wang L, Wang X, Chen Y. Magnetic order-induced polarization anomaly of Raman scattering in 2D magnet CrI3. Nano letters. 2019, 20(1), 729-34. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b04634

    2019 doi

  42. [51]

    Lattice dynamics and phase transition in CrI 3 single crystals

    Djurdjić-Mijin S, Šolajić A, Pešić J, Šćepanović M, Liu Y, Baum A, Petrovic C, Lazarević N, Popović ZV. Lattice dynamics and phase transition in CrI 3 single crystals. Physical Review B. 2018, 98(10), 104307. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.104307

    2018 doi

  43. [52]

    Vibrational excitations of pure FeCl3 and graphite intercalated with ferric chloride

    Caswell N, Solin SA. Vibrational excitations of pure FeCl3 and graphite intercalated with ferric chloride. Solid State Communications. 1978 , 27(10), 961-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-1098(78)91015-3

    1978 doi

  44. [53]

    Raman spectrum of CrI3: An ab initio study

    Larson DT, Kaxiras E. Raman spectrum of CrI3: An ab initio study. Physical Review B. 2018 , 98(8), 085406. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.98.085406

    2018 doi

  45. [54]

    Küchler, T

    R. Küchler, T. Bauer, M. Brando, and F. Steglich, The Review of scientific instruments 83, 095102 (2012)

    2012

  46. [55]

    Küchler, A

    R. Küchler, A. Wo¨rl, P. Gegenwart, M. Berben, B. Bryant, and S. Wiedmann, The Review of scientific instruments 88, 083903 (2017)

    2017

  47. [56]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total -energy ca lculations using a plane -wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  48. [57]

    Klingeler, J

    R. Klingeler, J. Geck, S. Arumugam, N. Tristan, P. Reutler, B. Büchner, L. Pinsard -Gaudart, and A. Revcolevschi, Phys. Rev. B 73, 214432 (2006)

    2006

  49. [58]

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-022-00139-1

    doi

  50. [59]

    Werner, W

    J. Werner, W. Hergett, M. Gertig, J. Park, C. Koo, and R. Klingeler, Physical Review B 95, 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.214414 (2017)

    2017 doi

  51. [60]

    Roslova, J

    M. Roslova, J. Hunger, G. Bastien, D. Pohl, H. M. Haghighi, A. U. B. Wolter, A. Isaeva, U. Schwarz, B. Rellinghaus, K. Nielsch, B. Büchner, and T. Doert, Inorganic Chemistry 58, 6659 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.8b03545

    2019 doi

  52. [61]

    Gegenwart, Reports on Progress in Physics 79, 114502 (2016)

    P. Gegenwart, Reports on Progress in Physics 79, 114502 (2016)

    2016

  53. [62]

    W. N. Hansen and M. Griffel, The Journal of Chemical Physics 28, 902 (1958),

    1958

  54. [63]

    Spachmann, S

    S. Spachmann, S. Selter, B. Büchner, S. A swartham, and R. Klingeler, Phys. Rev. B 107, 184421 (2023)

    2023

  55. [64]

    Spachmann, A

    S. Spachmann, A. Elghandour, S. Selter, B. Büchner, S. Aswartham, and R. Klingeler, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, L022040 (2022)

    2022

  56. [65]

    M. He, X. Wang, L. Wang, F. Hardy, T. Wolf, P. Adelmann, T. Brückel, Y. Su, and C. Meingast, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 30, 385702 (2018)

    2018

  57. [72]

    https://doi.org/10.1039/d0nr02829k

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.