Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 4 cited by

The Rich JWST Spectrum of the Western Nucleus of Arp 220: Shocked Hot Core Chemistry Dominates the Inner Disk

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read JWST spectra show the western nucleus of Arp 220 is a shocked hot core with no AGN signature.

desk verdict Genuinely new JWST data and careful fits make this a valuable paper on Arp 220's western nucleus, but the absolute column densities and the warm HCN component rest on pure-absorption LTE assumptions that the authors flag but do not fully quantify. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.10271 v2 pith:W6F4JFU7 submitted 2025-02-14 astro-ph.GA

Victorine Buiten , Paul van der Werf , Serena Viti , Daniel Dicken , Almudena Alonso Herrero , Gillian Wright , Torsten Böker , Bernhard Brandl
show 15 more authors
Luis Colina Macarena García Maríin Thomas Greve Pierre Guillard Olivia Jones Laura Hermosa Muñoz Álvaro Labiano Göran Östlin Lara Pantoni Martin Ward Michele Perna Ewine van Dishoeck Thomas Henning Manuel Güdel Thomas Ray
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords Arp220ultraluminousinfraredgalaxiesJWSTmid-infraredspectroscopymolecularabsorptionbandshotcoresstarburstgalaxyAGNsignatures
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper analyzes the full 3–28 µm JWST spectra of the western nucleus of Arp 220, the nearest ultraluminous infrared galaxy, and extracts column densities and rotational temperatures for fourteen molecular species from their rovibrational absorption bands. It argues that the absorbing gas is not a cold foreground screen but sits in the inner regions of the 100 pc starburst disk, directly around a hot 20 pc core with dust temperature $T_\mathrm{d} \gtrsim 500$ K. The inferred HCN, C$_2$H$_2$, and CO$_2$ column densities are an order of magnitude higher than previous Spitzer estimates, and a warm 330 K HCN component is interpreted as radiatively excited by that hot inner core. The chemical footprint matches Galactic hot cores with an added shock signature, and the paper finds no evidence for X-ray-driven chemistry or extreme excitation that would betray a buried AGN. If correct, the result reshapes how the dense nuclear gas in obscured mergers is probed and what it can say about the nature of the central engine.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the LTE spectral fitting of rovibrational bands with a free scalar background fraction $f_\mathrm{bg}$, which parametrizes the fraction of observed continuum that passes through the absorbing gas and is constrained when Q-branches saturate. The critical identity is the dilution-factor relation $f_D = (e^{E_{ul}/k_B T_\mathrm{bg}}-1)/(e^{E_{ul}/k_B T_\mathrm{rot}}-1)$, which converts the measured 330 K HCN rotational temperature into a geometric dilution factor for a 600–1500 K background, placing the gas at the edge of the opaque core. The supporting toy model—a hot 1000 K background blackbody behind a cool 100 K foreground dust shell—explains the wavelength-dependent background fractions and the partial filling of the 14 µm bands by line emission while leaving the 7 µm bands nearly intact. This combination of saturated-feature fitting, a dilution-factor identity, and a foreground-dilution toy model carries the central argument that the absorbing gas is deep inside the nuclear disk rather than in a cold foreground screen.

What would settle it

A resolved, higher-signal observation of the 14 µm HCN ν2 band that shows its Q-branch in emission rather than absorption—or a non-LTE radiative-transfer calculation demonstrating that the P/R-branch asymmetry requires substantial emission filling—would falsify the pure-absorption column densities and the low background fractions.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Using MIRI/MRS and NIRSpec/IFU spectra that for the first time separate the two nuclei of Arp 220, the paper detects rovibrational absorption bands of C$_2$H$_2$, HCN, HNC, CO$_2$, H$_2$O, CO, CH$_4$, C$_2$H, NO, N$_2$H$^+$, and other species along the line of sight to the western nucleus. The key quantitative claim is that the optically thick Q-branches of C$_2$H$_2$, HCN, and HNC force a background fraction $f_\mathrm{bg}$ well below unity (about 0.28 at 14 µm and 0.06 for HNC at 21.6 µm), so the true column densities are much larger than the absorption depths naively suggest: HCN, C$_2$H$_2$, and CO$_2$ columns come out an order of magnitude above the earlier Spitzer values. A second, warm HCN component with $T_\mathrm{rot}=330$ K is required to fit the 14 µm Q-branch shape; the paper attributes it to radiative excitation by the hot inner nucleus seen with a dilution factor $f_D\approx0.2$–$0.5$. The derived chemistry is hot-core-like with a low C$_2$H$_2$ ortho-to-para ratio of $1.71\pm0.05$ and an HCN/HNC ratio above unity, and the paper concludes there is no sign of an AGN in either the chemistry or the excitation.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes every band is a pure absorption line under LTE with a single scalar background fraction $f_\mathrm{bg}$; if line emission fills in the bands, as the P/R-branch asymmetries and the tentative HCN hot band suggest, then the derived column densities are lower limits and the low derived background fractions change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The order-of-magnitude higher column densities mean the nuclear gas mass and abundances derived from mid-infrared absorption in ULIRGs need revision: C$_2$H$_2$ and HCN reach abundances near $10^{-6}$ relative to H$_2$.
  • The 330 K HCN component is a new diagnostic of the local radiation field and can be used to measure the brightness and dilution of an embedded hot core in other compact obscured nuclei.
  • The non-detection of the fast molecular outflow in absorption, despite its column density being above the detection limit, implies a covering-factor dilution that must be accounted for in future outflow studies using pencil-beam absorption.
  • The C$_2$H$_2$ ortho-to-para ratio of $1.71\pm0.05$, the first extragalactic measurement, provides a new probe of the past thermal history of the gas, analogous to hot-core measurements.
  • If no AGN is present, the entire energy budget of the western nucleus can be powered by star formation in a compact, highly obscured starburst disk, sharpening the debate on what powers ULIRG nuclei.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension is to compare the vibrational temperatures implied by the 7 and 14 µm bands: if the column-density discrepancy is indeed due to emission filling, non-LTE models should predict a measurable 14 µm emission component whose strength correlates with the 330 K rotational temperature.
  • The same foreground-dilution toy model could be applied to other compact obscured nuclei observed by JWST, predicting a correlation between band wavelength and derived background fraction; a uniform pattern would strengthen the hot-background interpretation.
  • If the hot core is purely starburst-powered, the inferred H$_2$ column density of $10^{23}$–$10^{24}$ cm$^{-2}$ in the inner disk constrains the star formation rate surface density there and could be compared to the supernova rate traced by the radio VLBI sources.
  • The tentative HCN 3ν2−ν2 hot-band detection, if confirmed, opens a direct probe of the vibrational temperature and would allow a purely radiative-excitation model of the HCN level populations to be tested against the data.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper presents 3–28 µm JWST MIRI/MRS and NIRSpec/IFU spectra of the western nucleus of Arp 220, the first spatially resolved mid-infrared spectroscopic view of this nucleus. The authors identify and model a large set of molecular rovibrational absorption bands, using LTE spectral models with MCMC fitting and a single scalar background fraction f_bg per band. They derive column densities and rotational temperatures for 10 species. The main claims are: (i) HCN, C2H2 and CO2 column densities an order of magnitude higher than previous Spitzer estimates because the Q-branches are optically thick and f_bg≈0.28; (ii) a warm 330 K HCN component radiatively excited by a hot (Td>500 K) embedded core; and (iii) a chemical footprint resembling Galactic hot cores with additional shock tracers, and no evidence for AGN-driven X-ray chemistry. The paper is careful in stating its assumptions and explicitly discusses the possibility of line emission filling in the absorption bands.

Significance. If correct, these results provide the deepest mid-infrared view of the Arp 220 western nucleus and establish rovibrational absorption spectroscopy as a powerful probe of compact obscured nuclei. The order-of-magnitude increase over Spitzer would revise our picture of the molecular content of ULIRG nuclei. The C2H2 ortho-to-para ratio of 1.71±0.05 is the first extragalactic measurement and offers a new diagnostic of nuclear chemistry. The absence of X-ray-driven chemical signatures in gas close to the putative buried AGN is an important, albeit not decisive, contribution to the AGN/starburst debate. The paper's strengths include the careful use of MCMC fitting, the explicit treatment of the degeneracy between f_bg and column density, and the transparent discussion of systematic uncertainties, including the self-identified limitations of the pure-absorption LTE approach.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 3; Section 4.1.2; Table 1; Eq. (1)] The pure-absorption LTE assumption with a single scalar background fraction is load-bearing for the central quantitative results. The paper itself provides evidence that this assumption is imperfect: P/R-branch asymmetries in H2O (Fig. 4) and CO (Fig. 5), and the tentative HCN 3ν2−ν2 hot band (Fig. 7) indicate line emission partially filling the absorption. In Section 4.1.2 the authors show that such emission can fill in the 14 µm ν2 band while leaving the 7 µm band nearly unchanged. Under these conditions the fitted f_bg values are lower limits, and the decomposition into 50 K and 330 K HCN components in Table 1 may not be unique. Because the warm 330 K component and the dilution factors derived from Eq. (1) in Section 4.3 underlie the main geometric conclusion, the paper would be substantially strengthened by a non-LTE or two-layer model, or by an explicit sensitivity test showing how the derived parameters change when emission filling is included.
  2. [Section 4.1.1; Table 1; Sections 3.1 and 3.4.2] The factor 1.6–2.0 discrepancy between the 7 µm and 14 µm column densities of HCN and C2H2 is acknowledged but not resolved. The toy model of Section 4.1.1 (Figs. 11–13) is invoked to explain the difference qualitatively, but it is not fitted to the data and does not demonstrate that a single set of physical parameters can reproduce the observed f_bg at 7, 14 and 21 µm simultaneously. Since the absolute column densities in Table 1 are central to the order-of-magnitude claim relative to Spitzer and to the abundance ratios in Section 4.4, the systematic uncertainty of roughly a factor of two should be propagated into the quoted column densities and the derived ratios.
  3. [Section 4.3; Eq. (1)] The derivation of the dilution factor f_D = 0.2–0.5 assumes that the 330 K rotational temperature of HCN is set entirely by radiative pumping from a blackbody with T_bg = 600–1500 K. The paper argues that collisional excitation is unlikely because of the high critical densities of the J≥10 levels, but it does not quantify the competition between collisional and radiative pumping, including the effect of photon trapping which it mentions. A simple LVG or two-level estimate would show whether the derived f_D and the resulting statement that the absorbing gas lies 'at or near the edge of the optically thick background source' are robust. Without this, the geometric interpretation is plausible but not fully secured.
  4. [Section 3.2; Table 1; Section 4.4] The H2O column density is listed in Table 1 and used in the chemical comparison of Section 4.4 (e.g., the [H2O]/[CO] ratio of ~1), despite the fact that the LTE model fails to reproduce the R-branch lines (Fig. 4) and the authors state that far-infrared radiative excitation is important for H2O. The quoted N(H2O) = (2.4–7.0)×10^18 cm^-2 should therefore be regarded as a rough estimate with large systematic uncertainty. Since H2O is one of the two most abundant molecules in the sample, this uncertainty propagates into the hot-core/shock chemistry conclusions. At minimum, the paper should either restrict the H2O-based claims to a lower limit or present a non-LTE excitation model for H2O.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.1; Section 3.4.2] The statement in Section 3.1 that 'we do not detect any clear hot band absorption' may be read as contradicting the tentative 3ν2−ν2 hot band detection in Section 3.4.2; clarifying that the former refers specifically to the 14 µm ν2 fundamental region would avoid confusion.
  2. [Table 1; Section 3.3] For CO, the text states that the cold and warm components are not uniquely determined by the fits because they vary strongly with small changes to the assumed kinematics, but the table lists only narrow ranges for their column densities and temperatures. It would be helpful to indicate in the table that these ranges do not include the kinematic degeneracy.
  3. [Section 4.4; Section 2] The abundance ratios in Section 4.4 compare CO, whose column density is measured from the 0.15 arcsec NIRSpec aperture (Section 2.2), with species measured from the 0.435 arcsec MIRI aperture. Since the CO absorption is known to be aperture-dependent, the aperture mismatch should be stated when presenting ratios involving CO.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the derived column densities and temperatures are MCMC fits to the observed absorption spectra with external line lists, and the interpretive models use independent submillimetre constraints; the paper's own caveats about LTE and pure-absorption assumptions are acknowledged systematics, not input-output identity.

full rationale

The paper's central quantitative results are obtained by fitting LTE absorption models with MCMC to the continuum-normalized MIRI/NIRSpec spectra, using external line lists from HITRAN, CDMS, and GEISA (Section 3). The background fraction f_bg is a free parameter constrained by the depth ratio between saturated Q-branches and P/R-branch lines; the factor-of-order-ten increase over Lahuis et al. (2007) follows from the fitted f_bg = 0.28 and the resolved P/R-branch lines, not from imposing the desired column densities. The 330 K HCN component is required to reproduce the asymmetric Q-branch shape in the LTE fit and is then interpreted as radiatively excited using Eq. 1 with Tbg taken from independent ALMA dust continuum measurements (Sakamoto et al. 2017). The toy model in Section 4.1.1 adopts N(HCN) = 2e18 cm^-2, Tvib = 440 K, and Trot = 150 K from independent submillimetre studies (Tunnard et al. 2015; Martín et al. 2016; Sakamoto et al. 2021b), so it does not feed the paper's own fitted values back into the derivation. Self-references (Buiten et al. 2024; Van der Werf et al. in prep; Perna et al. 2024) provide data-reduction context and complementary emission-line results; they are not used as the sole warrant for the absorption-line analysis or for the absence-of-AGN conclusion. The pure-absorption, scalar-f_bg LTE approximation is explicitly flagged in Sections 3 and 4.1.2 as a possible source of underestimated column densities if line emission fills the bands, which is an acknowledged systematic uncertainty rather than a circular step. No equation or fitted parameter is defined in terms of the claim it is used to support.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All derived gas properties (column densities, rotational temperatures, background fractions, OPR) are free parameters in LTE MCMC fits. The central quantity f_bg is constrained only by optically thick features. No new physical entities are introduced; the toy model of a hot background plus cool foreground is illustrative only.

free parameters (6)
  • fbg_14um_HCN_C2H2 = 0.28
    Fitted background fraction at 14 um for cold HCN and C2H2; coupled in the fit (Section 3.1).
  • fbg_HNC = 0.06
    Fitted background fraction for HNC at 21.6 um (Section 3.5).
  • OPR_C2H2 = 1.71
    Ortho-to-para ratio of C2H2 fitted in the 14 um band, fixed in the 7.5 um fit (Section 3.1).
  • Trot_warm_HCN = 330 K
    Second, warm HCN component required to fit the 14 um Q-branch (Section 3.1).
  • N_cold_HCN = 2.45e17 cm-2
    Column density of the 52 K HCN component at 14 um (Table 1).
  • N_C2H2 = 2.29e17 cm-2
    Column density of the 149 K C2H2 component at 13.7 um (Table 1).
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption LTE excitation for all fitted rovibrational bands
    Used throughout Section 3; non-LTE radiative pumping is discussed for H2O and the warm HCN component.
  • domain assumption Pure absorption lines
    Assumed at the start of Section 3; effects of emission are considered in Section 4.1.2.
  • domain assumption Scalar background fraction f_bg per band
    Section 3: 'We use a scalar background fraction under the assumption that... the spectral shape of the unabsorbed continuum does not vary greatly from that of the assumed total continuum.'
  • domain assumption PAH emission arises in the foreground
    Section 3.2, justified by Spoon et al. 2004 for the ISO spectrum of Arp 220.
  • domain assumption Continuum estimated by spline with manually placed nodes
    Section 3; systematic effects are discussed for CO and the 7.7 um complex.
  • standard math HITRAN/CDMS/GEISA line lists are correct
    Section 3: adopted for line positions, strengths, and partition functions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The Rich JWST Spectrum of the Western Nucleus of Arp 220: Shocked Hot Core Chemistry Dominates the Inner Disk." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/W6F4JFU7

@misc{pith2026250210271,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The Rich JWST Spectrum of the Western Nucleus of Arp 220: Shocked Hot Core Chemistry Dominates the Inner Disk},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/W6F4JFU7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.10271}
}
abstract

We present full 3-28 $\mathrm{\mu m}$ JWST MIRI/MRS and NIRSpec/IFU spectra of the western nucleus of Arp 220, the nearest ultraluminous infrared galaxy. This nucleus has long been suggested to possibly host an embedded Compton-thick AGN. Millimeter observations of the dust continuum suggest the presence of a distinct 20 pc core with a dust temperature of $T_\mathrm{d} \gtrsim 500~\mathrm{K}$, in addition to a 100 pc circumnuclear starburst disk. However, unambiguously identifying the nature of this core is challenging, due to the immense obscuration, the nuclear starburst activity, and the nearby eastern nucleus. With the JWST integral field spectrographs, we can, for the first time, separate the two nuclei across this full wavelength range, revealing a wealth of molecular absorption features towards the western nucleus. We analyse the rovibrational bands detected at 4-22 $\mathrm{\mu m}$, deriving column densities and rotational temperatures for 10 distinct species. Optically thick features of C$_2$H$_2$, HCN and HNC suggest that this molecular gas is hidden behind a curtain of cooler dust, and indicate that the column densities of C$_2$H$_2$ and HCN are an order of magnitude higher than previously derived from Spitzer observations. We identify a warm HCN component with rotational temperature $T_\mathrm{rot} = 330~\mathrm{K}$, which we associate with radiative excitation by the hot inner nucleus. We propose a geometry where the detected molecular gas is located in the inner regions of the starburst disk, directly surrounding the hot 20 $\mathrm{pc}$ core. The chemical footprint of the western nucleus is reminiscent of that of hot cores, with additional evidence for shocks. Despite the molecular material's close proximity to the central source, no evidence for the presence of an AGN in the form of X-ray-driven chemistry or extreme excitation is found.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.10271 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. MIRI false-colour image of Arp 220, using the F1280W (red), F1130W (green) and F770W (blue) filters. The blue rectangles indicate the smallest (channel 1) and largest (channel 4) fields of view of the MRS observations. The cyan circles indicate extraction apertures for the western and eastern nuclei, both with a radius of 0′′ .435. 2.2. NIRSpec In coordination with the MIRI observations, NIRSpec observa￾tions were t… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Combined NIRSpec/IFU G395H/F290LP + MIRI MRS spectrum of the western nucleus of Arp 220, extracted from a circular aperture of 0 ′′ .435 in radius. Major absorption features are indicated in purple (solids) and red (gas) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Top panel: observed spectrum and total model of the 14 µm region. Middle panel: continuum-normalised spectrum and model absorption spectrum. The model includes C2H2, two HCN components, N2H + and CO2. A fiducial model of HC3N with N = 3 × 1015 cm−2 , T = 50 K is plotted as well. All components are shown with fbg = 0.28, following the value inferred from C2H2 and HCN. The inset shows the model of the HCN Q-branch in … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The spectrum around 6 µm and the best-fit H2O model for fbg = 0.35. The top panel shows the absolute flux spectrum and continuum model. The middle panel shows the continuum-normalised spectrum. Strong H2O lines are labelled by their upper- and lower-level quantum numbe…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Best-fit model spectrum for CO, extracted from an r = 0 ′′ .15 aperture, with fbg = 0.77. The top panel shows the total model including the continuum, the middle panel shows the continuum-normalised spectrum, and the bottom panel shows the residuals on the continuum-no…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Continuum-normalised spectrum in between 7.2 µm and 8.1 µm vs. the best-fit LTE model for fbg(C2H2) = 0.2. The model includes the C2H2 ν4 + ν5 combination band, CH4 gas, and CH4 ice. Only the spectral region indicated in by the pink shaded area was included in the fit …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Best-fit LTE model for the HCN 2ν2 overtone band and the interloping H2O lines at 7 µm, for fbg = 1. The pink shaded area indicates the spectral region used in the fit. A simultaneously-fit H2O model is also shown. The HCN overtone lines are labelled, and the residuals…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Spectrum at 21 µm (blue) and best-fit model for HNC (red). The pink shaded areas indicate the spectral region used in the fit. The residuals are shown in the bottom panel, with the 68% interval indicated by the grey shaded area. of a clear HCO+ detection implies a rela…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Fiducial model for the tentative HCO+ band at 12.1 µm. This model has a temperature of T = 50 K, a column density of N(HCO+ ) = 5 × 1015 cm−2 , a velocity dispersion of σV = 75 km s−1 , and a background fraction of fbg = 0.28, matching that found for HCN and C2H2 at 14…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Best-fit LTE model for NO and C2H at 5 µm, with fbg = 1. The top panel shows the absorption model with the continuum and PAH emission, the middle panel shows the absorption spectrum, and the bottom panel shows the residuals on the absorption spectrum. Pink shaded area…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: HCNν2 and 2ν2 absorption bands relative to the observed con￾tinuum in the toy model of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_12.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Top: schematic illustration of the proposed line-of-sight geom￾etry. The molecular gas is embedded in cool dust that produces signifi￾cant foreground emission, filling in the features produced by absorption of hot background photons. Bottom: expected continuum spectru…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Schematic illustration of the proposed geometry of the WN along the line of sight. Following the interpretation of Sakamoto et al. (2021b), we assume that the south side of the disk is facing us with an inclination of i ≈ 60◦ , and that the biconical outflow is normal…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. JWST reveals cosmic ray dominated chemistry in the local ULIRG IRAS 07251$-$0248

    astro-ph.GA 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Molecular ion absorption bands in the ULIRG IRAS 07251 imply a cosmic ray ionization rate of log(zeta_H2/n_H) between -18.2 and -19.1 cm^3 s^-1, consistent with cosmic ray dominated chemistry.

  2. MICONIC: JWST/MIRI MRS reveals a fast ionized gas outflow in the central region of Centaurus A

    astro-ph.GA 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    JWST/MIRI MRS data show a fast ionized gas outflow in the central ~6 pc of Centaurus A, with velocities up to about 1000-1400 km/s and a mass outflow rate near 2 solar masses per year.

  3. JWST Observations of Young protoStars (JOYS): overview of program and early results

    astro-ph.GA 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    JWST MIRI-MRS maps of 23 protostars reveal nested jets, cool hot-core molecular emission, comparable ice abundances across stellar masses, a second HDO ice detection near 0.4%, and an O2 ice upper limit near 20% of water.

  4. Theoretical Diagnostics for the Physical Conditions in Active Galactic Nuclei under the View of JWST

    astro-ph.GA 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    New mid-IR line diagnostics from MAPPINGS V models to measure physical conditions in AGN for JWST.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    2015, A&A, 584, A42

    Aalto, S., Martín, S., Costagliola, F., et al. 2015, A&A, 584, A42

    2015

  2. [2]

    C., & Hüttemeister, S

    Aalto, S., Spaans, M., Wiedner, M. C., & Hüttemeister, S. 2007, A&A, 464, 193

    2007

  3. [3]

    2015, A&A, 579, A101 Alonso Herrero, A., Hermosa Muñoz, L., Labiano, A., et al

    Aladro, R., Martín, S., Riquelme, D., et al. 2015, A&A, 579, A101 Alonso Herrero, A., Hermosa Muñoz, L., Labiano, A., et al. 2024, A&A, 690, A95

    2015

  4. [4]

    A., & Hofner, P

    Araya, E., Baan, W. A., & Hofner, P. 2004, ApJS, 154, 541

    2004

  5. [5]

    R., et al

    Argyriou, I., Glasse, A., Law, D. R., et al. 2023, A&A, 675, A111

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    2007, ApJ, 656, 148 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A

    Armus, L., Charmandaris, V ., Bernard-Salas, J., et al. 2007, ApJ, 656, 148 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33

    work page 2007

  7. [7]

    A., Aditya, J

    Baan, W. A., Aditya, J. N. H. S., An, T., & Klöckner, H.-R. 2023, MNRAS, 523, 5487

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Baan, W. A. & Haschick, A. D. 1984, ApJ, 279, 541

    work page 1984

Show all 84 references
  1. [9]

    A., Haschick, A

    Baan, W. A., Haschick, A. D., & Henkel, C. 1989, ApJ, 346, 680

    1989

  2. [10]

    A., Wood, P

    Baan, W. A., Wood, P. A. D., & Haschick, A. D. 1982, ApJ, 260, L49 Barcos-Muñoz, L., Aalto, S., Thompson, T. A., et al. 2018, ApJ, 853, L28 Barcos-Muñoz, L., Leroy, A. K., Evans, A. S., et al. 2015, ApJ, 799, 10

    1982

  3. [11]

    G., Boogert, A., DeWitt, C

    Barr, A. G., Boogert, A., DeWitt, C. N., et al. 2020, ApJ, 900, 104

    2020

  4. [12]

    G., Holdship, J., et al

    Behrens, E., Mangum, J. G., Holdship, J., et al. 2022, ApJ, 939, 119 Böker, T., Beck, T. L., Birkmann, S. M., et al. 2023, PASP, 135, 038001

    2022

  5. [13]

    Boogert, A. C. A., Gerakines, P. A., & Whittet, D. C. B. 2015, ARA&A, 53, 541

    2015

  6. [14]

    Boonman, A. M. S., Stark, R., van der Tak, F. F. S., et al. 2001, ApJ, 553, L63

    2001

  7. [15]

    Boonman, A. M. S., van Dishoeck, E. F., Lahuis, F., & Doty, S. D. 2003, A&A, 399, 1063

    2003

  8. [16]

    A., van der Werf, P

    Buiten, V . A., van der Werf, P. P., Viti, S., et al. 2024, ApJ, 966, 166

    2024

  9. [17]

    2022, A&A, 667, A131

    Butterworth, J., Holdship, J., Viti, S., & García-Burillo, S. 2022, A&A, 667, A131

    2022

  10. [18]

    Charnley, S. B. & Kaufman, M. J. 2000, ApJ, 529, L111

    2000

  11. [19]

    2024, A&A, 685, A75

    Chown, R., Sidhu, A., Peeters, E., et al. 2024, A&A, 685, A75

    2024

  12. [20]

    2015, A&A, 582, A91

    Costagliola, F., Sakamoto, K., Muller, S., et al. 2015, A&A, 582, A91

    2015

  13. [21]

    A., et al

    Delahaye, T., Armante, R., Scott, N. A., et al. 2021, Journal of Molecular Spec- troscopy, 380, 111510 D’Eugenio, F., Pérez-González, P. G., Maiolino, R., et al. 2024, Nature Astron- omy, 8, 1443

    2021

  14. [22]

    R., García-Bernete, I., Rigopoulou, D., et al

    Donnan, F. R., García-Bernete, I., Rigopoulou, D., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 529, 1386

    2024

  15. [23]

    D., van Dishoeck, E

    Doty, S. D., van Dishoeck, E. F., van der Tak, F. F. S., & Boonman, A. M. S. 2002, A&A, 389, 446

    2002

  16. [24]

    P., Schlemmer, S., Schilke, P., Stutzki, J., & Müller, H

    Endres, C. P., Schlemmer, S., Schilke, P., Stutzki, J., & Müller, H. S. P. 2016, Journal of Molecular Spectroscopy, 327, 95

    2016

  17. [25]

    2015, A&A, 580, A52

    Falstad, N., González-Alfonso, E., Aalto, S., et al. 2015, A&A, 580, A52

    2015

  18. [26]

    W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. 2013, PASP, 125, 306

    2013

  19. [27]

    L., van Dishoeck, E

    Francis, L., van Gelder, M. L., van Dishoeck, E. F., et al. 2024, A&A, 683, A249 Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari, A., Brown, A. G. A., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A1 García-Bernete, I., Pereira-Santaella, M., González-Alfonso, E., et al. 2024, A&A, 682, L5

    2024

  20. [28]

    E., Buiten, V

    Goldberg, C. E., Buiten, V . A., Rieke, G. H., et al. 2024, ApJ, 977, 55

    2024

  21. [29]

    Goldsmith, P. F. & Langer, W. D. 1999, ApJ, 517, 209 González-Alfonso, E., Fischer, J., Bruderer, S., et al. 2013, A&A, 550, A25 González-Alfonso, E., Fischer, J., Graciá-Carpio, J., et al. 2012, A&A, 541, A4 González-Alfonso, E., García-Bernete, I., Pereira-Santaella, M., et ...

    1999

  22. [30]

    E., Rothman, L

    Gordon, I. E., Rothman, L. S., Hargreaves, R. J., et al. 2022, J. Quant. Spectr. Rad. Transf., 277, 107949

    2022

  23. [31]

    D., Aalto, S., König, S., et al

    Gorski, M. D., Aalto, S., König, S., et al. 2023, A&A, 670, A70

    2023

  24. [32]

    R., Carico, D

    Graham, J. R., Carico, D. P., Matthews, K., et al. 1990, ApJ, 354, L5

    1990

  25. [33]

    S., Martín, S., et al

    Harada, N., Meier, D. S., Martín, S., et al. 2024, ApJS, 271, 38

    2024

  26. [34]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357 Hermosa Muñoz, L., Alonso-Herrero, A., Labiano, A., et al. 2025, A&A, 693, A321

    2020

  27. [35]

    E., Vacca, W

    Hibbard, J. E., Vacca, W. D., & Yun, M. S. 2000, AJ, 119, 1130

    2000

  28. [36]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing In Science & Engineering, 9, 90

    2007

  29. [37]

    2009, AJ, 137, 3581

    Imanishi, M., Nakanishi, K., Tamura, Y ., & Peng, C.-H. 2009, AJ, 137, 3581

    2009

  30. [38]

    C., Álvarez-Márquez, J., Sloan, G

    Jones, O. C., Álvarez-Márquez, J., Sloan, G. C., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 523, 2519

    2023

  31. [39]

    Joseph, R. D. & Wright, G. S. 1985, MNRAS, 214, 87

    1985

  32. [40]

    2001, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol

    Kohno, K., Matsushita, S., Vila-Vilaró, B., et al. 2001, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 249, The Central Kiloparsec of Star- bursts and AGN: The La Palma Connection, ed. J. H. Knapen, J. E. Beckman, I. Shlosman, & T. J. Mahoney, 672

    2001

  33. [41]

    2008, ApJ, 677, 262

    Krips, M., Neri, R., García-Burillo, S., et al. 2008, ApJ, 677, 262

    2008

  34. [42]

    Lahuis, F., Spoon, H. W. W., Tielens, A. G. G. M., et al. 2007, ApJ, 659, 296

    2007

  35. [43]

    & van Dishoeck, E

    Lahuis, F. & van Dishoeck, E. F. 2000, A&A, 355, 699

    2000

  36. [44]

    Lai, T. S. Y ., Armus, L., U, V ., et al. 2022, ApJ, 941, L36

    2022

  37. [45]

    Law, D. R., E. Morrison, J., Argyriou, I., et al. 2023, AJ, 166, 45

    2023

  38. [46]

    J., Diamond, P

    Lonsdale, C. J., Diamond, P. J., Thrall, H., Smith, H. E., & Lonsdale, C. J. 2006, ApJ, 647, 185

    2006

  39. [47]

    & Scoville, N

    Manohar, S. & Scoville, N. 2017, ApJ, 835, 127 Martín, S., Aalto, S., Sakamoto, K., et al. 2016, A&A, 590, A25 Martín, S., Krips, M., Martín-Pintado, J., et al. 2011, A&A, 527, A36

    2017

  40. [48]

    F., & van der Werf, P

    Meijerink, R., Spaans, M., Loenen, A. F., & van der Werf, P. P. 2011, A&A, 525, A119

    2011

  41. [49]

    Nagy, Z., Ossenkopf, V ., Van der Tak, F. F. S., et al. 2015, A&A, 578, A124

    2015

  42. [50]

    D., et al

    Nishimura, Y ., Aalto, S., Gorski, M. D., et al. 2024, A&A, 686, A48

    2024

  43. [51]

    Norris, R. P. 1988, MNRAS, 230, 345

    1988

  44. [52]

    2024, ApJ, 976, 106

    Onishi, S., Nakagawa, T., Baba, S., et al. 2024, ApJ, 976, 106

    2024

  45. [53]

    A., & Weiß, A

    Ott, J., Henkel, C., Braatz, J. A., & Weiß, A. 2011, ApJ, 742, 95

    2011

  46. [54]

    2020, A&A, 643, A139

    Perna, M., Arribas, S., Catalán-Torrecilla, C., et al. 2020, A&A, 643, A139

    2020

  47. [55]

    2024, A&A, 690, A171 Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y ., et al

    Perna, M., Arribas, S., Lamperti, I., et al. 2024, A&A, 690, A171 Planck Collaboration, Aghanim, N., Akrami, Y ., et al. 2020, A&A, 641, A6

    2024

  48. [56]

    Rangwala, N., Colgan, S. W. J., Le Gal, R., et al. 2018, ApJ, 856, 9

    2018

  49. [57]

    R., Glenn, J., et al

    Rangwala, N., Maloney, P. R., Glenn, J., et al. 2011, ApJ, 743, 94

    2011

  50. [58]

    H., Arendt, R., et al

    Rho, J., Park, S. H., Arendt, R., et al. 2024, ApJ, 969, L9

    2024

  51. [59]

    & Bressert, E

    Robitaille, T. & Bressert, E. 2012, APLpy: Astronomical Plotting Library in

    2012

  52. [60]

    2017, ApJ, 849, 14

    Sakamoto, K., Aalto, S., Barcos-Muñoz, L., et al. 2017, ApJ, 849, 14

    2017

  53. [61]

    S., Wiedner, M

    Sakamoto, K., Aalto, S., Evans, A. S., Wiedner, M. C., & Wilner, D. J. 2010, ApJ, 725, L228

    2010

  54. [62]

    J., et al

    Sakamoto, K., Aalto, S., Wilner, D. J., et al. 2009, ApJ, 700, L104

    2009

  55. [63]

    Z., Yun, M

    Sakamoto, K., Scoville, N. Z., Yun, M. S., et al. 1999, ApJ, 514, 68

    1999

  56. [64]

    J., Ghosh, T., Catinella, B., et al

    Salter, C. J., Ghosh, T., Catinella, B., et al. 2008, AJ, 136, 389

    2008

  57. [65]

    B., Soifer, B

    Sanders, D. B., Soifer, B. T., Elias, J. H., et al. 1988, ApJ, 325, 74

    1988

  58. [66]

    2017, ApJ, 836, 66

    Scoville, N., Murchikova, L., Walter, F., et al. 2017, ApJ, 836, 66

    2017

  59. [67]

    2015, ApJ, 800, 70

    Scoville, N., Sheth, K., Walter, F., et al. 2015, ApJ, 800, 70

    2015

  60. [68]

    Z., Evans, A

    Scoville, N. Z., Evans, A. S., Dinshaw, N., et al. 1998, ApJ, 492, L107

    1998

  61. [69]

    Z., Sanders, D

    Scoville, N. Z., Sanders, D. B., Sargent, A. I., et al. 1986, ApJ, 311, L47

    1986

  62. [70]

    E., Lonsdale, C

    Smith, H. E., Lonsdale, C. J., Lonsdale, C. J., & Diamond, P. J. 1998, ApJ, 493, L17

    1998

  63. [71]

    Smith, J. D. T., Draine, B. T., Dale, D. A., et al. 2007, ApJ, 656, 770

    2007

  64. [72]

    T., Helou, G., Lonsdale, C

    Soifer, B. T., Helou, G., Lonsdale, C. J., et al. 1984, ApJ, 283, L1

    1984

  65. [73]

    T., Neugebauer, G., Matthews, K., et al

    Soifer, B. T., Neugebauer, G., Matthews, K., et al. 1999, ApJ, 513, 207

    1999

  66. [74]

    Sonnentrucker, P., González-Alfonso, E., & Neufeld, D. A. 2007, ApJ, 671, L37

    2007

  67. [75]

    Spoon, H. W. W., Moorwood, A. F. M., Lutz, D., et al. 2004, A&A, 414, 873

    2004

  68. [76]

    2005, PASJ, 57, L29

    Takano, S., Nakanishi, K., Nakai, N., & Takano, T. 2005, PASJ, 57, L29

    2005

  69. [77]

    1986, Journal of Molecular Spec- troscopy, 117, 408

    Tanaka, K., Kawaguchi, K., & Hirota, E. 1986, Journal of Molecular Spec- troscopy, 117, 408

    1986

  70. [78]

    H., Rigby, J

    Teng, S. H., Rigby, J. R., Stern, D., et al. 2015, ApJ, 814, 56

    2015

  71. [79]

    R., Garcia-Burillo, S., et al

    Tunnard, R., Greve, T. R., Garcia-Burillo, S., et al. 2015, ApJ, 800, 25

    2015

  72. [80]

    2025, A&A, 693, A36 van der Tak, F

    Ulivi, L., Perna, M., Lamperti, I., et al. 2025, A&A, 693, A36 van der Tak, F. F. S., van Dishoeck, E. F., Evans, II, N. J., Bakker, E. J., & Blake, G. A. 1999, ApJ, 522, 991 van Dishoeck, E. F., Grant, S., Tabone, B., et al. 2023, Faraday Discussions, 245, 52 van Gelder, M. L...

    2025

  73. [81]

    E., Batejat, F., et al

    Varenius, E., Conway, J. E., Batejat, F., et al. 2019, A&A, 623, A173

    2019

  74. [82]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261

    2020

  75. [83]

    2020, ApJ, 896, 43

    Wheeler, J., Glenn, J., Rangwala, N., & Fyhrie, A. 2020, ApJ, 896, 43

    2020

  76. [84]

    S., Rieke, G

    Wright, G. S., Rieke, G. H., Glasse, A., et al. 2023, PASP, 135, 048003 1 Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, PO Box 9513, 2300 RA Lei- den, The Netherlands 2 Transdisciplinary Research Area (TRA) ‘Matter’ /Argelander- Institut für Astronomie, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germ...

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.