REVIEW 3 cited by
A new lower bound for multi-color discrepancy with applications to fair division
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
A classical problem in combinatorics seeks colorings of low discrepancy. More concretely, the goal is to color the elements of a set system so that the number of appearances of any color among the elements in each set is as balanced as possible. We present a new lower bound for multi-color discrepancy, showing that there is a set system with $n$ subsets over a set of elements in which any $k$-coloring of the elements has discrepancy at least $\Omega\left(\sqrt{\frac{n}{\ln{k}}}\right)$. This result improves the previously best-known lower bound of $\Omega\left(\sqrt{\frac{n}{k}}\right)$ of Doerr and Srivastav [2003] and may have several applications. Here, we explore its implications on the feasibility of fair division concepts for instances with $n$ agents having valuations for a set of indivisible items. The first such concept is known as consensus $1/k$-division up to $d$ items (\cd$d$) and aims to allocate the items into $k$ bundles so that no matter which bundle each agent is assigned to, the allocation is envy-free up to $d$ items. The above lower bound implies that \cd$d$ can be infeasible for $d\in \Omega\left(\sqrt{\frac{n}{\ln{k}}}\right)$. We furthermore extend our proof technique to show that there exist instances of the problem of allocating indivisible items to $k$ groups of $n$ agents in total so that envy-freeness and proportionality up to $d$ items are infeasible for $d\in \Omega\left(\sqrt{\frac{n}{k\ln{k}}}\right)$ and $d\in \Omega\left(\sqrt{\frac{n}{k^3\ln{k}}}\right)$, respectively. The lower bounds for fair division improve the currently best-known ones by Manurangsi and Suksompong [2022].
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Fair Division Among Couples and Small Groups
For two couples a balanced EF1 allocation always exists and is efficiently computable, while three or more couples may have no EF1 allocation; for groups of size at most k, an fPO and PROPk allocation can always be fo...
-
On Hierarchies of Fairness Notions in Cake Cutting: From Proportionality to Super Envy-Freeness
Introduces CHB-k and CLB-k cake-cutting fairness hierarchies, with an O(n^4)-query protocol for CHB-n, an Ω(n^2) lower bound for CHB-2, and proof that CLB-2 and super envy-freeness require unbounded queries.
-
Simultaneously Fair Allocation of Indivisible Items Across Multiple Dimensions
The paper introduces strong simultaneous envy-freeness up to c goods for multidimensional fair division, proves existence bounds independent of the item count, and shows NP-hardness for checking weak and strong sEF1.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.