Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 1 minor 148 references

A survey on factors influencing mobile application usability through the lens of PACMAD+3 model

T0 review · 1 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-05-23 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Users rate efficiency as highly important for mobile app usability while rating seven other factors moderately important.

desk verdict This survey reports user ratings on PACMAD+3 factors but skips all the usual checks on whether the questions actually measured what they were supposed to. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.11069 v2 submitted 2025-02-16 cs.HC

Pawel Weichbroth This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.HC
keywords mobileusabilityPACMAD+3modelusersurveyefficiencyfactorsapplicationshuman-computerinteraction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper presents a survey that measures how much users value each of the eight factors in the PACMAD+3 model for mobile application usability. The model provides a list of factors thought to affect usability in mobile settings, and the study turns those factors into specific survey questions answered by 838 users. The central result is that efficiency receives a high average importance rating while cognitive load, errors, learnability, operability, effectiveness, memorability, and understandability receive moderate ratings. This ranking supplies concrete guidance on which aspects of an app to emphasize during design and testing. The work therefore supplies both an empirical baseline for the model and practical input for mobile developers.

What carries the argument

The PACMAD+3 model, an eight-factor framework for mobile usability, turned into a set of survey questions that measure users' perceived importance of each factor.

What would settle it

A new survey or behavioral study on a comparable user sample that finds a different ordering of average importance ratings for the eight factors would undermine the reported result.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

By operationalizing the PACMAD+3 factors into survey items and collecting responses from 838 users, the study establishes that efficiency is rated highly important on average for mobile application usability, whereas the other seven factors—cognitive load, errors, learnability, operability, effectiveness, memorability, and understandability—are rated moderately important.

Load-bearing premise

The survey questions accurately captured users' views on how much each PACMAD+3 factor influences mobile app usability.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Mobile app designers can give efficiency features higher priority than features tied to the other seven factors.
  • Usability evaluations can weight efficiency more heavily when scoring apps.
  • The moderate ratings for the remaining factors still require attention during development rather than complete neglect.
  • The survey instrument itself can be reused or adapted for further studies of mobile usability.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Actual usage logs or task-completion data might show different relative impacts than the self-reported importance ratings collected here.
  • Importance rankings could shift across app categories such as games versus productivity tools.
  • The moderate ratings suggest room to test whether improving the lower-rated factors still yields measurable gains in user retention.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports results from a survey of 838 mobile application users assessing the perceived importance of the eight factors in the PACMAD+3 usability model. The authors state that they operationalized the theoretical constructs (efficiency, cognitive load, errors, learnability, operability, effectiveness, memorability, and understandability) into measurable survey items; the primary finding is that users rated efficiency as highly important on average while rating the remaining seven factors as moderately important.

Significance. If the survey instrument validly and reliably measured the distinct constructs, the work would supply empirical data on user perceptions of mobile usability factors that could inform design guidelines and extend the PACMAD+3 model in HCI. The sample size is a positive feature. The absence of any reported validation steps, however, prevents assessment of whether the observed rating pattern reflects genuine differences in perceived importance.

major comments (1)
  1. [Methodology] Methodology section: the paper asserts that the survey operationalized the PACMAD+3 factors into observable and measurable phenomena, yet supplies no description of item generation, expert review, pilot testing, or reliability/validity checks (e.g., Cronbach's alpha, confirmatory factor analysis). This gap is load-bearing for the central claim, because the reported distinction between 'highly important' (efficiency) and 'moderately important' (the other seven factors) depends on the items accurately capturing the intended constructs rather than wording artifacts.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the summary of findings would be strengthened by a brief statement of survey design or analysis approach.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback on the methodology. We agree that the lack of detail on survey item development and validation is a substantive gap that affects the interpretability of the results, and we will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methodology] Methodology section: the paper asserts that the survey operationalized the PACMAD+3 factors into observable and measurable phenomena, yet supplies no description of item generation, expert review, pilot testing, or reliability/validity checks (e.g., Cronbach's alpha, confirmatory factor analysis). This gap is load-bearing for the central claim, because the reported distinction between 'highly important' (efficiency) and 'moderately important' (the other seven factors) depends on the items accurately capturing the intended constructs rather than wording artifacts.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript does not describe the process of operationalizing the PACMAD+3 constructs into survey items, nor does it report expert review, pilot testing, or reliability/validity analyses. The current text states only that the constructs were operationalized without providing the supporting methodological steps. In the revision we will expand the Methodology section to include: (1) how items were generated from prior PACMAD+3 literature, (2) any expert review or pilot testing performed, and (3) post-hoc reliability statistics (e.g., Cronbach's alpha) calculated from the collected data. If formal validation steps were limited, we will explicitly note this limitation rather than overstate the instrument's rigor. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: direct survey ratings with no derivation or self-referential fitting

full rationale

The paper reports average user ratings (n=838) on the perceived importance of eight PACMAD+3 factors. No equations, predictions, fitted parameters, or self-citation chains appear in the derivation. The central claim is an empirical summary of responses; it does not reduce to its inputs by construction. Lack of reported validation (pilot testing, reliability metrics) is a methodological limitation but does not constitute circularity under the defined patterns.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This is an empirical survey paper; the primary inputs are the existing PACMAD+3 model and standard survey techniques rather than new parameters or entities.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption The PACMAD+3 model is a suitable and complete framework for assessing mobile application usability factors.
    The study relies on this model as the basis for the survey without independent validation of its factors.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A survey on factors influencing mobile application usability through the lens of PACMAD+3 model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2502.11069

@misc{pith2026250211069,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A survey on factors influencing mobile application usability through the lens of PACMAD+3 model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2502.11069}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.11069}
}
read the original abstract

Undeniably, the advent of mobile applications has brought new frontiers to usability engineering. To date, ongoing research has shown significant efforts to adopt and adapt usability principles to the mobile computing environment. One of these endeavors is the PACMAD+3 model. However, to the best of our knowledge, little or no effort has been made to empirically evaluate these factors against perceived influence. With this in mind, the objective of this study is to explore this issue. To achieve this goal in a reliable and reproducible manner, we took advantage of previous attempts to conceptualize the mobile usability factors, but we contribute by operationalizing these theoretical constructs into observable and measurable phenomena. In this sense, the survey was designed and carried out on a sample of 838 users to assess the significance of the PACMAD+3 factors on the perceived usability of mobile applications. Our findings show that, on average, users rated efficiency as highly important, while the remaining seven, namely: cognitive load, errors, learnability, operability, effectiveness, memorability, and understandability, were rated moderately important. Insights into the importance of usability factors and the corresponding features can also facilitate the design and development of mobile applications. Therefore, our research contributes to the field of human-computer interaction with theoretical and practical implications for mobile usability researchers, UX designers, and quality assurance engineers.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.11069 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Correlation heatmaps of mobile usability features. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

148 extracted references · 148 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    & Irani, P

    Ens, B., Eskicioglu, R. & Irani, P. Guidelines for designing awareness- augmented mobile DUIs. International Journal Of Human-Computer Interaction. 28, 730-736 (2012)

    work page 2012

  2. [2]

    & Abran, A

    Moumane, K., Idri, A. & Abran, A. Usability evaluation of mobile ap- plications using ISO 9241 and ISO 25062 standards. SpringerPlus. 5 pp. 1-15 (2016)

    work page 2016

  3. [3]

    & Schell, R

    Lee, V., Schneider, H. & Schell, R. Mobile applications: architecture, design, and development. (Prentice Hall PTR,2004)

    work page 2004

  4. [4]

    Software engineering issues for mobile application devel- opment

    Wasserman, A. Software engineering issues for mobile application devel- opment. Proceedings Of The FSE/SDP Workshop On Future Of Soft- ware Engineering Research. pp. 397-400 (2010)

    work page 2010

  5. [5]

    & Conte, T

    Nascimento, I., Silva, W., Gadelha, B. & Conte, T. Userbility: a tech- nique for the evaluation of user experience and usability on mobile ap- plications. Human-Computer Interaction. Theory, Design, Development 27 And Practice: 18th International Conference, HCI International 2016, Toronto, ON, Canada, July 17-22, 2016. Proceedings, Part I 18 . pp. 372-383 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    & Khajouei, R

    Jeddi, F., Nabovati, E., Bigham, R. & Khajouei, R. Usability evaluation of a comprehensive national health information system: relationship of quality components to users’ characteristics. International Journal Of Medical Informatics. 133 pp. 104026 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    & Malau-Aduli, B

    Adu, M., Malabu, U., Malau-Aduli, A. & Malau-Aduli, B. The devel- opment of My Care Hub mobile-phone app to support self-management in Australians with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Scientific Reports. 10, 7 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    & Chabrera, C

    Manzano-Monfort, G., Paluzie, G., D´ ıaz-Geg´ undez, M. & Chabrera, C. Usability of a mobile application for health professionals in home care services: A user-centered approach. Scientific Reports. 13, 2607 (2023)

    work page 2023

Show all 148 references
  1. [9]

    & Nak- aguchi, T

    Shinozaki, M., Saito, D., Tomita, K., Nakada, T., Nomura, Y. & Nak- aguchi, T. Usability evaluation of a glove-type wearable device for ef- ficient biometric collection during triage. Scientific Reports. 14, 9874 (2024)

    2024

  2. [10]

    & Clemmensen, T

    Aryana, B. & Clemmensen, T. Mobile usability: experiences from Iran and Turkey.International Journal Of Human-Computer Interaction. 29, 220-242 (2013)

    2013

  3. [11]

    & Villalba, L

    Da Costa, R., Canedo, E., De Sousa, R., Albuquerque, R. & Villalba, L. Set of usability heuristics for quality assessment of mobile applications on smartphones. IEEE Access. 7 pp. 116145-116161 (2019)

    2019

  4. [12]

    & P¨ arn¨ anen, K

    Kivij¨ arvi, H. & P¨ arn¨ anen, K. Instrumental usability and effective user experience: Interwoven drivers and outcomes of Human-Computer in- teraction. International Journal Of Human–Computer Interaction . 39, 34-51 (2023)

    2023

  5. [13]

    & Bradley, M

    Ham, D., Heo, J., Fossick, P., Wong, W., Park, S., Song, C. & Bradley, M. Conceptual framework and models for identifying and organizing us- ability impact factors of mobile phones. Proceedings Of The 18th Aus- tralia Conference On Computer-Human Interaction: Design: Activitie...

    2006

  6. [14]

    & Razali, R

    Baharuddin, R., Singh, D. & Razali, R. Usability dimensions for mobile applications-a review. Res. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol . 5, 2225-2231 (2013)

    2013

  7. [15]

    & Vafadar, S

    Ghazizadeh, F. & Vafadar, S. A quantitative evaluation of usability in mobile applications: An empirical study. 2017 International Symposium On Computer Science And Software Engineering Conference (CSSE) . pp. 1-6 (2017)

    2017

  8. [16]

    & Duce, D

    Harrison, R., Flood, D. & Duce, D. Usability of mobile applications: literature review and rationale for a new usability model. Journal Of Interaction Science. 1 pp. 1-16 (2013)

    2013

  9. [17]

    Usability of mobile applications: A consolidated model

    Weichbroth, P. Usability of mobile applications: A consolidated model. IEEE Access. (2024)

    2024

  10. [18]

    Usability of mobile applications: a systematic literature study

    Weichbroth, P. Usability of mobile applications: a systematic literature study. Ieee Access. 8 pp. 55563-55577 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    (2018), https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9241:-11:ed-2:v1:en [Accessed on: 02.11.2023]

    ISO ISO 9241-11:2018(en) Ergonomics of human-system interac- tion — Part 11: Usability: Definitions and concepts. (2018), https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:9241:-11:ed-2:v1:en [Accessed on: 02.11.2023]

    2018

  12. [20]

    & Rezaei, M

    Parsazadeh, N., Ali, R. & Rezaei, M. A framework for cooperative and interactive mobile learning to improve online information evalua- tion skills. Computers & Education . 120 pp. 75-89 (2018)

    2018

  13. [21]

    & Lunerti, C

    Miguel-Hurtado, O., Guest, R. & Lunerti, C. Voice and face interac- tion evaluation of a mobile authentication platform. 2017 International Carnahan Conference On Security Technology (ICCST) . pp. 1-6 (2017)

    2017

  14. [22]

    & Damayanti, A

    Restuputri, D., Masudin, I. & Damayanti, A. The role of usability in business-to-customer digital transactions on multiservice platforms of Indonesian e-money providers. Digital Transformation Management. pp. 226-246 (2022)

    2022

  15. [23]

    An empirical study on the impact of gender on mobile applications usability

    Weichbroth, P. An empirical study on the impact of gender on mobile applications usability. IEEE Access. 10 pp. 119419-119436 (2022) 29

    2022

  16. [24]

    & Coskun, F

    Rukzio, E., Noda, C., De Luca, A., Hamard, J. & Coskun, F. Automatic form filling on mobile devices. Pervasive And Mobile Computing. 4, 161- 181 (2008)

    2008

  17. [25]

    & Ruoti, S

    Oesch, S., Gautam, A. & Ruoti, S. The emperor’s new autofill frame- work: a security analysis of autofill on iOS and Android. Proceedings Of The 37th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference . pp. 996-1010 (2021)

    2021

  18. [26]

    & Ruoti, S

    Simmons, J., Diallo, O., Oesch, S. & Ruoti, S. Systematization of pass- word manageruse cases and design paradigms. Proceedings Of The 37th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference. pp. 528-540 (2021)

    2021

  19. [27]

    & Yang, J

    Zhu, T., Qu, Z., Xu, H., Zhang, J., Shao, Z., Chen, Y., Prabhakar, S. & Yang, J. RiskCog: Unobtrusive real-time user authentication on mobile devices in the wild. IEEE Transactions On Mobile Computing . 19, 466-483 (2019)

    2019

  20. [28]

    & Jung, S

    Shin, J. & Jung, S. Heuristic smartphone usability evaluations of the mobile application NANDA, nursing interventions classification, and nursing outcomes classification customized for nursing home registered nurses. International Journal Of Nursing Knowledge. 34, 307-315 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    & Annamalai, R

    Mahamad, S., Syed Mansoor, S. & Annamalai, R. User Perception on Intelligent Split Menu for Web Browser Data Entry. Innovations And Advanced Techniques In Computer And Information Sciences And En- gineering. pp. 439-442 (2007)

    2007

  22. [30]

    & Schmidt, A

    Kern, D. & Schmidt, A. Design space for driver-based automotive user interfaces. Proceedings Of The 1st International Conference On Auto- motive User Interfaces And Interactive Vehicular Applications . pp. 3-10 (2009)

    2009

  23. [31]

    Influence of Mental Model of GUI on Usability

    Yang, W. Influence of Mental Model of GUI on Usability. 9th Inter- national Conference On Kansei Engineering And Emotion Research. KEER2022. Proceedings. pp. 377-386 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    & Ibrahim, O

    Nosseir, A., Flood, D., Harrison, R. & Ibrahim, O. Mobile development process spiral. 2012 Seventh International Conference On Computer En- gineering & Systems (ICCES) . pp. 281-286 (2012) 30

    2012

  25. [33]

    & Sudirman, I

    Hutahaean, H., Govindaraju, R. & Sudirman, I. Identifying usability risks for mobile application. Proceedings Of The 2020 International Con- ference On Engineering And Information Technology For Sustainable Industry. pp. 1-6 (2020)

    2020

  26. [34]

    Classifying and selecting UX and usability measures

    Bevan, N. Classifying and selecting UX and usability measures. Interna- tional Workshop On Meaningful Measures: Valid Useful User Experience Measurement. 11 pp. 13-18 (2008)

    2008

  27. [35]

    & Chakraborty, J

    Dixon, J., Dehlinger, J., Dixon, S. & Chakraborty, J. Usability Test- ing Results for a Mobile Medical Transition Application. Design, User Experience, And Usability: Novel User Experiences: 5th International Conference, DUXU 2016, Held As Part Of HCI International 2016, Toron...

    2016

  28. [36]

    The User Experience of Smart-Phone Information Hierarchy and Screen Transition Patterns

    Nam-gu, I. The User Experience of Smart-Phone Information Hierarchy and Screen Transition Patterns. International Journal Of Multimedia And Ubiquitous Engineering. 11, 293-302 (2016)

    2016

  29. [37]

    Usability Testing of Mobile Applications: A Method- ological Framework

    Weichbroth, P. Usability Testing of Mobile Applications: A Method- ological Framework. Applied Sciences. 14, 1792 (2024)

    2024

  30. [38]

    & Skorin-Kapov, L

    Barakovi´ c, S. & Skorin-Kapov, L. Multidimensional modelling of quality of experience for mobile web browsing. Computers In Human Behavior . 50 pp. 314-332 (2015)

    2015

  31. [39]

    & Zhang, J

    Wang, Y., Huang, Y., Li, J. & Zhang, J. The effect of mobile applica- tions’ initial loading pages on users’ mental state and behavior.Displays. 68 pp. 102007 (2021)

    2021

  32. [40]

    Wang, J., Li, Y., Yang, S., Dong, S. & Li, J. Waiting experience: Opti- mization of feedback mechanism of voice user interfaces based on time perception. IEEE Access. 11 pp. 21241-21251 (2023)

    2023

  33. [41]

    & Uehara, T

    Gao, J., Tsai, W., Paul, R., Bai, X. & Uehara, T. Mobile Testing-as- a-Service (MTaaS)–Infrastructures, Issues, Solutions and Needs. 2014 IEEE 15th International Symposium On High-Assurance Systems Engi- neering. pp. 158-167 (2014) 31

    2014

  34. [42]

    & Uitdenbogerd, A

    Majrashi, K., Hamilton, M. & Uitdenbogerd, A. Task continuity and mobile user interfaces.Proceedings Of The 17th International Conference On Mobile And Ubiquitous Multimedia . pp. 475-481 (2018)

    2018

  35. [43]

    & Oliveira Souza, L

    Wangenheim, C., Witt, T., Borgatto, A., Nunes, J., Lacerda, T., Krone, C. & Oliveira Souza, L. A usability score for mobile phone applications based on heuristics. International Journal Of Mobile Human Computer Interaction (IJMHCI). 8, 23-58 (2016)

    2016

  36. [44]

    & Fabil, N

    Saleh, A., Ismail, R. & Fabil, N. Evaluating usability for mobile appli- cation: A MAUEM approach. Proceedings Of The 2017 International Conference On Software And E-Business . pp. 71-77 (2017)

    2017

  37. [45]

    & Wang, H

    Yu, M., Zhou, R., Cai, Z., Tan, C. & Wang, H. Unravelling the relation- ship between response time and user experience in mobile applications. Internet Research. 30, 1353-1382 (2020)

    2020

  38. [46]

    Dead Lock - iOS App Development

    Hussain, A. Dead Lock - iOS App Development. (2024), https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/dead-lock-ios-app-development- ios-mobile-app-developer–ua1nf/ [Accessed on: 09.05.2024]

    2024

  39. [47]

    & Kharisma, A

    Az-zahra, H., Fauzi, N. & Kharisma, A. Evaluating E-marketplace mo- bile application based on people at the center of mobile application de- velopment (PACMAD) usability model. 2019 International Conference On Sustainable Information Engineering And Technology (SIET) . pp. 72-...

    2019

  40. [48]

    Radio Mobile Apps Review: User Measurement and Ap- preciation

    Irwansyah, I. Radio Mobile Apps Review: User Measurement and Ap- preciation. Advanced Science Letters. 24, 7137-7140 (2018)

    2018

  41. [49]

    & Setchi, R

    Marsh, A. & Setchi, R. Design for intuitive use: a study of mobile phones. 4th I* PROMS Virtual International Conference . (2008)

    2008

  42. [50]

    & Marsh, A

    Britton, A., Setchi, R. & Marsh, A. Intuitive interaction with multi- functional mobile interfaces.Journal Of King Saud University-Computer And Information Sciences. 25, 187-196 (2013)

    2013

  43. [51]

    & Hurtienne, J

    Naumann, A. & Hurtienne, J. Benchmarks for intuitive interaction with mobile devices. Proceedings Of The 12th International Conference On Human Computer Interaction With Mobile Devices And Services . pp. 401-402 (2010) 32

    2010

  44. [52]

    & Correia, A

    Liu, C. & Correia, A. A Case Study of Learners’ Engagement in Mobile Learning Applications.. Online Learning. 25, 25-48 (2021)

    2021

  45. [53]

    & Chooramun, N

    Ramdowar, H., Khedo, K. & Chooramun, N. A comprehensive review of mobile user interfaces in mHealth applications for elderly and the related ageing barriers. Universal Access In The Information Society . pp. 1-17 (2023)

    2023

  46. [54]

    & Yao, J

    Xiao, T., Wang, J., Zheng, H. & Yao, J. Design and optimization of mo- bile learning applications based on Hierarchical Bayes conjoint models of user preferences. Multimedia Tools And Applications . 83, 17001-17024 (2024)

    2024

  47. [55]

    & Chetty, M

    Mathur, A. & Chetty, M. Impact of user characteristics on attitudes towards automatic mobile application updates. Thirteenth Symposium On Usable Privacy And Security (SOUPS 2017) . pp. 175-193 (2017)

    2017

  48. [56]

    & Wang, N

    Huang, R., Miao, H. & Wang, N. Updating APP to Improve Users’ Satisfaction: Insights from users’ Review. (2022)

    2022

  49. [57]

    & Hayati, S

    Nurdina, G., Putri, T. & Hayati, S. Usability Telecontextual Study for Nursing Students: Unfolding Case Study. KnE Life Sciences . pp. 697- 704 (2021)

    2021

  50. [58]

    & El Qadi, A

    Lahrache, S., El Ouazzani, R. & El Qadi, A. Visualizations memorability through visual attention and image features.Procedia Computer Science. 127 pp. 328-335 (2018)

    2018

  51. [59]

    & Kim, D

    Coursaris, C. & Kim, D. A meta-analytical review of empirical mobile usability studies. Journal Of Usability Studies . 6, 117-171 (2011)

    2011

  52. [60]

    Evaluating PSAU mobile application based on people at the cen- ter of mobile application development (PACMAD) usability model: em- pirical investigation

    Afif, M. Evaluating PSAU mobile application based on people at the cen- ter of mobile application development (PACMAD) usability model: em- pirical investigation. Journal Of Computer Science . 17, 275-283 (2021)

    2021

  53. [61]

    & Mehmood, R

    Nizamani, S., Hassan, S., Shaikh, R., Abozinadah, E. & Mehmood, R. A novel hybrid textual-graphical authentication scheme with better security, memorability, and usability. IEEE Access. 9 pp. 51294-51312 (2021) 33

    2021

  54. [62]

    & Zainuddin, N

    Abd Raof, S., Hashim, N. & Zainuddin, N. An Evaluation of Quran Memorization Mobile App among Middle-Aged Adults and Early El- derly. Journal Of Computing Research And Innovation . 4, 1-7 (2019)

    2019

  55. [63]

    Hsu, S., Perng, C., Chiou, W. & Ou, T. Usability Evaluation of Mobile Commerce Website on Internet–An empirical study. (2014)

    2014

  56. [64]

    & Ding, C

    Hung, C., Chou, J. & Ding, C. Enhancing mobile satisfaction through integration of usability and flow. Engineering Management Research. 1, 44 (2012)

    2012

  57. [65]

    & Yakunin, A

    Bodrunova, S. & Yakunin, A. Impact of menu complexity upon user behavior and satisfaction in information search. Human Interface And The Management Of Information. Information In Applications And Ser- vices: 20th International Conference, HIMI 2018, Held As Part Of HCI Interna...

    2018

  58. [66]

    & Mourato-Dussault, F

    Nickerson, R. & Mourato-Dussault, F. Managing stored data for mobile apps: survey of apps and case study. (2015)

    2015

  59. [67]

    & Mourato-Dussault, F

    Nickerson, R. & Mourato-Dussault, F. Selecting a stored data approach for mobile apps. Journal Of Theoretical And Applied Electronic Com- merce Research. 11, 35-49 (2016)

    2016

  60. [68]

    & Edara, P

    Azadi, F., Adu-Gyamfi, Y., Sun, C. & Edara, P. Mobile application development and testing for work zone activity real-time data collection. Transportation Research Record. 2674, 351-362 (2020)

    2020

  61. [69]

    & Bahaj, S

    Ali, W., Riaz, O., Mumtaz, S., Khan, A., Saba, T. & Bahaj, S. Mobile Application Usability Evaluation: A Study Based on Demography.IEEE Access. 10 pp. 41512-41524 (2022)

    2022

  62. [70]

    & Padda, H

    Seffah, A., Donyaee, M., Kline, R. & Padda, H. Usability measurement and metrics: A consolidated model. Software Quality Journal . 14 pp. 159-178 (2006)

    2006

  63. [71]

    & Weise, C

    Franke, D., Kowalewski, S. & Weise, C. A mobile software quality model. 2012 12th International Conference On Quality Software . pp. 154-157 (2012) 34

    2012

  64. [72]

    & Toledo, C

    Alvarado, L., Dom´ ınguez, E., Vel´ azquez, Y., Isidro, S. & Toledo, C. Layered software architecture for the development of mobile learning objects with augmented reality. IEEE Access. 6 pp. 57897-57909 (2018)

    2018

  65. [73]

    & Cernuzzi, L

    N´ u˜ nez, M., Bonhaure, D., Gonz´ alez, M. & Cernuzzi, L. A model-driven approach for the development of native mobile applications focusing on the data layer. Journal Of Systems And Software. 161 pp. 110489 (2020)

    2020

  66. [74]

    & Rusu, V

    Inostroza, R., Rusu, C., Roncagliolo, S., Jimenez, C. & Rusu, V. Us- ability heuristics for touchscreen-based mobile devices.2012 Ninth Inter- national Conference On Information Technology-new Generations . pp. 662-667 (2012)

    2012

  67. [75]

    & Isom¨ aki, H

    Kuparinen, L., Silvennoinen, J. & Isom¨ aki, H. Introducing usability heuristics for mobile map applications. International Cartographic Con- ference. (2013)

    2013

  68. [76]

    & Mandl, T

    Heuwing, B., K¨ oller, I., Schanz, V. & Mandl, T. Usability of Gesture- based Mobile Applications for First-time Use.. MuC. pp. 233-242 (2015)

    2015

  69. [77]

    & Song, J

    Pushp, S., Liu, Y., Xu, M., Koh, C. & Song, J. PrivacyShield: A mobile system for supporting subtle just-in-time privacy provisioning through off-screen-based touch gestures. Proceedings Of The ACM On Interac- tive, Mobile, Wearable And Ubiquitous Technologies . 2, 1-38 (2018)

    2018

  70. [78]

    & Yang, L

    Wu, H. & Yang, L. User-defined gestures for dual-screen mobile in- teraction. International Journal Of Human–Computer Interaction . 36, 978-992 (2020)

    2020

  71. [79]

    & Schlick, C

    Schneider, N., Wilkes, J., Grandt, M. & Schlick, C. Investigation of input devices for the age-differentiated design of human-computer interaction. Proceedings Of The Human Factors And Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 52, 144-148 (2008)

    2008

  72. [80]

    & Zhang, Y

    Qin, J., Liu, X. & Zhang, Y. Usability Testing for Mobile Input Method Interaction Design. Applied Mechanics And Materials . 63 pp. 952-955 (2011)

    2011

  73. [81]

    & Others Usability testing of a mobile app to report medication errors anonymously: mixed-methods approach

    George, D., Hassali, M., Amar-Singh, H. & Others Usability testing of a mobile app to report medication errors anonymously: mixed-methods approach. JMIR Human Factors. 5, e12232 (2018) 35

    2018

  74. [82]

    Complex mobile learning that adapts to learners’ cognitive load

    Deegan, R. Complex mobile learning that adapts to learners’ cognitive load. International Journal Of Mobile And Blended Learning (IJMBL) . 7, 13-24 (2015)

    2015

  75. [83]

    & Paas, F

    Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J. & Paas, F. Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review . 10 pp. 251-296 (1998)

    1998

  76. [84]

    & Trawi´ nski, B

    Karczewska, B., Kukla, E., Muke, P., Telec, Z. & Trawi´ nski, B. Us- ability study of mobile applications with cognitive load resulting from environmental factors. Intelligent Information And Database Systems: 13th Asian Conference, ACIIDS 2021, Phuket, Thailand, April 7–10, 2...

    2021

  77. [85]

    & Rajarajan, M

    Smith-Creasey, M. & Rajarajan, M. Adaptive threshold scheme for touchscreen gesture continuous authentication using sensor trust. 2017 IEEE Trustcom/BigDataSE/ICESS. pp. 554-561 (2017)

    2017

  78. [86]

    & Rothwell, P

    Deegan, R. & Rothwell, P. Usability in Mobile Learning: Results from a study of learning under varying levels of extraneous cognitive load. Proc IHCI. (2011)

    2011

  79. [87]

    & Others Design, development, utility and usability testing of the EMPOWER-SUSTAIN Self-Management Mobile App© among primary care physicians and patients with metabolic syndrome

    Daud, M., Yusoff, F., Abdul-Razak, S., Baharudin, N., Mohamed- Yassin, M., Badlishah-Sham, S., Nikmat, A., Isa, M., Jamil, N., Nawawi, H. & Others Design, development, utility and usability testing of the EMPOWER-SUSTAIN Self-Management Mobile App© among primary care physician...

    2023

  80. [88]

    Mobile HCI: Issues Surrounding Cognition, Distraction, Us- ability and Performance

    Deegan, R. Mobile HCI: Issues Surrounding Cognition, Distraction, Us- ability and Performance. International Journal Of Mobile Human Com- puter Interaction (IJMHCI) . 6, 1-14 (2014)

    2014

  81. [89]

    The effect of screen size on students’ cognitive load in mobile learning

    Alasmari, T. The effect of screen size on students’ cognitive load in mobile learning. Journal Of Education, Teaching And Learning . 5, 280- 295 (2020)

    2020

  82. [90]

    & Billinghurst, M

    Ibili, E. & Billinghurst, M. Assessing the relationship between cognitive load and the usability of a mobile augmented reality tutorial system: A study of gender effects. International Journal Of Assessment Tools In Education. 6, 378-395 (2019) 36

    2019

  83. [91]

    & Fink, L

    Ilany-Tzur, N. & Fink, L. Mobile State of Mind: The Effect of Cognitive Load on Mobile Users’ Cognitive Performance.. ICIS. (2019)

    2019

  84. [92]

    & Pryss, R

    Schobel, J., Probst, T., Reichert, M., Schlee, W., Schickler, M., Kestler, H. & Pryss, R. Measuring mental effort for creating mobile data col- lection applications. International Journal Of Environmental Research And Public Health. 17, 1649 (2020)

    2020

  85. [93]

    & Zheng, R

    Greenberg, K. & Zheng, R. Revisiting the debate on germane cognitive load versus germane resources. Journal Of Cognitive Psychology . 35, 295-314 (2023)

    2023

  86. [94]

    & Heuvel, A

    Leppink, J. & Heuvel, A. The evolution of cognitive load theory and its application to medical education. Perspectives On Medical Education. 4 pp. 119-127 (2015)

    2015

  87. [95]

    A usability model for mobile applications generated with a model-driven approach

    Ammar, L. A usability model for mobile applications generated with a model-driven approach. International Journal Of Advanced Computer Science And Applications. 10 (2019)

    2019

  88. [96]

    & Peter, C

    Pfister, H., Wollst¨ adter, S. & Peter, C. Affective responses to system messages in human–computer-interaction: Effects of modality and mes- sage type. Interacting With Computers . 23, 372-383 (2011)

    2011

  89. [97]

    & Adnan, W

    Ahmad, N., Baharum, Z., Zainal, A., Razak, F. & Adnan, W. Spiritual User Experience (iSUX) for Older Adult Users using Mobile Application. International Journal Of Advanced Computer Science And Applications. 12 (2021)

    2021

  90. [98]

    & Islam, M

    Afrin, S., Zaman, S., Sadekeen, D., Islam, Z., Tabassum, N. & Islam, M. How usability and user experience vary among the basic m-commerce, AR and VR based user interfaces of mobile application for online shop- ping. Advances In Design And Digital Communication II: Proceedings ...

    2021

  91. [99]

    & Franco, J

    Castilla, R., Pacheco, A. & Franco, J. Digital government: Mobile ap- plications and their impact on access to public information. SoftwareX. 22 pp. 101382 (2023) 37

    2023

  92. [100]

    & Lewis, G

    Chang, K., Myers, B., Cahill, G., Simanta, S., Morris, E. & Lewis, G. Improving structured data entry on mobile devices. Proceedings Of The 26th Annual ACM Symposium On User Interface Software And Technology. pp. 75-84 (2013)

    2013

  93. [101]

    & Shinde, S

    Piplani, D., Singh, D., Srinivasan, K., Lonkar, V. & Shinde, S. ICT in Social Development—Context-Sensitive Design Strategies to Develop Mobile Applications for Barefoot Animal Breeders. Advanced Compu- tational And Communication Paradigms: Proceedings Of International Confere...

    2017

  94. [102]

    The effects of suggested tags and autocomplete features on social tagging behaviors

    Holstrom, C. The effects of suggested tags and autocomplete features on social tagging behaviors. Proceedings Of The Association For Infor- mation Science And Technology. 57, e263 (2020)

    2020

  95. [103]

    & Stavrianos, A

    Goumopoulos, C., Papa, I. & Stavrianos, A. Development and evalua- tion of a mobile application suite for enhancing the social inclusion and well-being of seniors. Informatics. 4, 15 (2017)

    2017

  96. [104]

    & Gonz´ alez, M

    P´ erez-Medina, J., Zalakeviciute, R., Rybarczyk, Y. & Gonz´ alez, M. Evaluation of the usability of a mobile application for public air qual- ity information. Advances In Human Factors And Systems Interaction: Proceedings Of The AHFE 2019 International Conference On Human Fac...

    2019

  97. [105]

    & Ajayi, O

    Tovide, A., Tucker, W. & Ajayi, O. Signsupport: an emergency mobile application for the Deaf. 2022 IST-Africa Conference (IST-Africa). pp. 1-13 (2022)

    2022

  98. [106]

    & Ferro, N

    Agosti, M. & Ferro, N. Managing the interactions between handheld devices, mobile applications, and users. Advances In Mobile Commerce Technologies. pp. 205-234 (2003)

    2003

  99. [107]

    & Carchietti, E

    Chittaro, L., Zuliani, F. & Carchietti, E. Mobile devices in emergency medical services: user evaluation of a PDA-based interface for ambu- lance run reporting. International Workshop On Mobile Information Technology For Emergency Response. pp. 19-28 (2007) 38

    2007

  100. [108]

    & Nasim, M

    Bilal, A., Rextin, A., Kakakhel, A. & Nasim, M. Analyzing emergent users’ text messages data and exploring its benefits. IEEE Access. 7 pp. 2870-2879 (2018)

    2018

  101. [109]

    & Zheng, Z

    Liang, T., Chen, L., Ying, X., Philip, S., Wu, J. & Zheng, Z. Mobile application rating prediction via feature-oriented matrix factorization. 2017 IEEE International Conference On Web Services (ICWS). pp. 261- 268 (2017)

    2017

  102. [110]

    & Nielsen, J

    Norman, D. & Nielsen, J. Gestural interfaces: a step backward in us- ability. Interactions. 17, 46-49 (2010)

    2010

  103. [111]

    McGrenere, J. & Ho, W. Affordances: Clarifying and evolving a con- cept. Graphics Interface. 2000 pp. 179-186 (2000)

    2000

  104. [112]

    & Kinnunen, T

    Kangas, E. & Kinnunen, T. Applying user-centered design to mo- bile application development. Communications Of The ACM . 48, 55-59 (2005)

    2005

  105. [113]

    & Csallner, C

    Nguyen, T. & Csallner, C. Reverse engineering mobile application user interfaces with remaui (t). 2015 30th IEEE/ACM International Confer- ence On Automated Software Engineering (ASE) . pp. 248-259 (2015)

    2015

  106. [114]

    & Csallner, C

    Natarajan, S. & Csallner, C. P2A: A tool for converting pixels to ani- mated mobile application user interfaces. Proceedings Of The 5th Inter- national Conference On Mobile Software Engineering And Systems . pp. 224-235 (2018)

    2018

  107. [115]

    & Durdu, P

    Deniz, G. & Durdu, P. A comparison of mobile form controls for dif- ferent tasks. Computer Standards & Interfaces . 61 pp. 97-106 (2019)

    2019

  108. [116]

    & Abelson, H

    Kim, D., Granquist, A., Patton, E., Friedman, M. & Abelson, H. Speak your mind: Introducing aptly, the software platform that turns ideas into working apps. ICERI2022 Proceedings. pp. 1653-1660 (2022)

    2022

  109. [117]

    Wen, H., Wang, H., Liu, J. & Li, Y. Droidbot-gpt: Gpt-powered ui automation for android. ArXiv Preprint arXiv:2304.07061. (2023)

    2023

  110. [118]

    & AlZeyara, A

    Mansar, S., Jariwala, S., Shahzad, M., Anggraini, A., Behih, N. & AlZeyara, A. A usability testing experiment for a localized weight loss mobile application. Procedia Technology. 5 pp. 839-848 (2012) 39

    2012

  111. [119]

    & Escobedo, L

    Moroyoqui, M., Espina, D., Osuna, H. & Escobedo, L. SmarTasko: Supporting short and spontaneous activities of daily living of ADHD individuals. Proceedings Of The 9th Mexican International Conference On Human-Computer Interaction . pp. 1-6 (2022)

    2022

  112. [120]

    & Hayakawa, Y

    Nakagawa, R., Ohkawa, Y., Zhao, X., Takahashi, A., Ohyama, T., Mitsuishi, T. & Hayakawa, Y. Implementation of UX Design to Enhance Spontaneous and Continuous Study of a Mobile Application for Foreign Language Learning. EdMedia+ Innovate Learning. pp. 1119-1123 (2022)

    2022

  113. [121]

    & Pimentel, M

    Cunha, B., Machado Neto, O. & Pimentel, M. A heuristic evaluation of a mobile annotation tool. Proceedings Of The 19th Brazilian Symposium On Multimedia And The Web . pp. 89-92 (2013)

    2013

  114. [122]

    Survey research methods

    Fowler Jr, F. Survey research methods. (Sage publications,2013)

    2013

  115. [123]

    Bennett, C., Khangura, S., Brehaut, J., Graham, I., Moher, D., Potter, B. & M. Grimshaw, J. Reporting guidelines for survey research: an analysis of published guidance and reporting practices. PLoS Medicine. 8, e1001069 (2011)

    2011

  116. [124]

    & Tysinger, J

    Passmore, C., Dobbie, A., Parchman, M. & Tysinger, J. Guidelines for constructing a survey. Family Medicine-Kansas City. 34, 281-286 (2002)

    2002

  117. [125]

    Convenience sampling, random sampling, and snowball sampling: How does sampling affect the validity of research?

    Emerson, R. Convenience sampling, random sampling, and snowball sampling: How does sampling affect the validity of research?. Journal Of Visual Impairment & Blindness . 109, 164-168 (2015)

    2015

  118. [126]

    & Olsen, N

    Johnson, S., Potrebny, T., Larun, L., Ciliska, D. & Olsen, N. Usability methods and attributes reported in usability studies of mobile apps for health care education: protocol for a scoping review. JMIR Research Protocols. 9, e19072 (2020)

    2020

  119. [127]

    & Noguchi, A

    Vasa, R., Hoon, L., Mouzakis, K. & Noguchi, A. A preliminary anal- ysis of mobile app user reviews. Proceedings Of The 24th Australian Computer-human Interaction Conference. pp. 241-244 (2012)

    2012

  120. [128]

    & Abran, A

    Genc-Nayebi, N. & Abran, A. A systematic literature review: Opinion mining studies from mobile app store user reviews. Journal Of Systems And Software. 125 pp. 207-219 (2017) 40

    2017

  121. [129]

    & Orji, R

    Alqahtani, F. & Orji, R. Insights from user reviews to improve mental health apps. Health Informatics Journal . 26, 2042-2066 (2020)

  122. [130]

    & Yoon, W

    Heo, J., Ham, D., Park, S., Song, C. & Yoon, W. A framework for evaluating the usability of mobile phones based on multi-level, hierarchi- cal model of usability factors. Interacting With Computers. 21, 263-275 (2009)

    2009

  123. [131]

    & Peeters, A

    Hensher, M., Cooper, P., Dona, S., Angeles, M., Nguyen, D., Heyns- bergh, N., Chatterton, M. & Peeters, A. Scoping review: development and assessment of evaluation frameworks of mobile health apps for rec- ommendations to consumers. Journal Of The American Medical Infor- matic...

    2021

  124. [132]

    Building a Framework to Improve the User Experience of Static Analysis Tools

    Schlichtig, M. Building a Framework to Improve the User Experience of Static Analysis Tools. Proceedings Of The 2024 IEEE/ACM 46th Inter- national Conference On Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings. pp. 165-169 (2024)

    2024

  125. [133]

    & Manner, J

    Zuniga, A., Flores, H., Lagerspetz, E., Nurmi, P., Tarkoma, S., Hui, P. & Manner, J. Tortoise or hare? Quantifying the effects of performance on mobile app retention. The World Wide Web Conference . pp. 2517- 2528 (2019)

    2019

  126. [134]

    & Hitz, M

    Leitner, G., Ahlstr¨ om, D. & Hitz, M. Usability of mobile computing in emergency response systems–Lessons learned and future directions. HCI And Usability For Medicine And Health Care: Third Symposium Of The Workgroup Human-Computer Interaction And Usability Engineering Of Th...

    2007

  127. [135]

    & Weichbroth, P

    Redlarski, K. & Weichbroth, P. Hard lessons learned: delivering us- ability in IT projects. 2016 Federated Conference On Computer Science And Information Systems (FedCSIS) . pp. 1379-1382 (2016)

    2016

  128. [136]

    & Ramirez, A

    Inupakutika, D., Rodriguez, G., Akopian, D., Lama, P., Chalela, P. & Ramirez, A. On the Performance of Cloud-Based mHealth Applications: A Methodology on Measuring Service Response Time and a Case Study. IEEE Access. 10 pp. 53208-53224 (2022) 41

    2022

  129. [137]

    & Juristo, N

    Ferreira, J., Rodr´ ıguez, F., Santos, A., Dieste, O., Acu˜ na, S. & Juristo, N. Impact of usability mechanisms: A family of experiments on effi- ciency, effectiveness and user satisfaction. IEEE Transactions On Soft- ware Engineering. 49, 251-267 (2022)

    2022

  130. [138]

    (2023), https://codeagency.pl/en/ux-ui-design-how-to-create- an-intuitive-and-usable-interface/ [Accessed on: 08.06.2024]

    CodeAgency UX/UI Design: How to create an intuitive and usable in- terface?. (2023), https://codeagency.pl/en/ux-ui-design-how-to-create- an-intuitive-and-usable-interface/ [Accessed on: 08.06.2024]

    2023

  131. [139]

    & Ince, I

    Canbazoglu, E., Salman, Y., Yildirim, M., Merdenyan, B. & Ince, I. Developing a mobile application to better inform patients and enable ef- fective consultation in implant dentistry. Computational And Structural Biotechnology Journal. 14 pp. 252-261 (2016)

    2016

  132. [140]

    & Mehta, V

    Jadhav, D., Bhutkar, G. & Mehta, V. Usability evaluation of messenger applications for Android phones using cognitive walkthrough. Proceed- ings Of The 11th Asia Pacific Conference On Computer Human Inter- action. pp. 9-18 (2013)

    2013

  133. [141]

    Evaluate Interface Learnability with Cognitive Walk- throughs

    Salazar, K. Evaluate Interface Learnability with Cognitive Walk- throughs. (2022), https://www.nngroup.com/articles/cognitive- walkthroughs/ [Accessed on: 09.06.2024]

    2022

  134. [142]

    & Catarci, T

    Marrella, A. & Catarci, T. Measuring the learnability of interactive systems using a Petri Net based approach. Proceedings Of The 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference . pp. 1309-1319 (2018)

    2018

  135. [143]

    Top 20 must-know mobile app UX best practices

    Joshi, S. Top 20 must-know mobile app UX best practices. (2024), https://sendbird.com/blog/mobile-app-ux-best-practices [Accessed on: 09.06.2024]

    2024

  136. [144]

    & Budu, G

    Arkorful, V., Lugu, B., Basiru, I., Hammond, A., Arkorful, V. & Budu, G. Voter’s choice of a presidential candidate: An empirical study. Jour- nal Of Public Affairs . 22, e2576 (2022)

    2022

  137. [145]

    Pragmatic statistics: Likert-type questionnaires processing

    Ginters, E. Pragmatic statistics: Likert-type questionnaires processing. World Conference On Information Systems And Technologies. pp. 23-51 (2023)

    2023

  138. [146]

    & Mayhew, P

    Alqahtani, M., Alhadreti, O., Alrobaea, R. & Mayhew, P. Investiga- tion into the impact of the usability factor on the acceptance of mobile 42 transactions: Empirical study in Saudi Arabia. International Journal Of Human Computer Interaction . 6, 1-35 (2015)

    2015

  139. [147]

    & Bahaadinbeigy, K

    Hajesmaeel-Gohari, S., Khordastan, F., Fatehi, F., Samzadeh, H. & Bahaadinbeigy, K. The most used questionnaires for evaluating satis- faction, usability, acceptance, and quality outcomes of mobile health. BMC Medical Informatics And Decision Making . 22, 22 (2022)

    2022

  140. [148]

    & Kozak, M

    Camilleri, M., Troise, C. & Kozak, M. Functionality and usability fea- tures of ubiquitous mobile technologies: the acceptance of interactive travel apps. Journal Of Hospitality And Tourism Technology . 14, 188- 207 (2023) 43 Declarations Ethical Approval No experiments were p...

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed May 23, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.