Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Don't Get Lost in the Trees: Streamlining LLM Reasoning by Overcoming Tree Search Exploration Pitfalls

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.11183 v2 pith:3Z6EQHQV submitted 2025-02-16 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords reasoningsearchtextbftreealgorithmscomputationalduringfetch
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Recent advancements in tree search algorithms guided by verifiers have significantly enhanced the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs), but at the cost of increased computational resources. In this work, we identify two key challenges contributing to this inefficiency: $\textit{over-exploration}$ due to redundant states with semantically equivalent content, and $\textit{under-exploration}$ caused by high variance in verifier scoring leading to frequent trajectory switching. To address these issues, we propose FETCH, an e$\textbf{f}$fici$\textbf{e}$nt $\textbf{t}$ree sear$\textbf{ch}$ framework, which is a flexible, plug-and-play system compatible with various tree search algorithms. Our framework mitigates over-exploration by merging semantically similar states using agglomerative clustering of text embeddings obtained from a fine-tuned SimCSE model. To tackle under-exploration, we enhance verifiers by incorporating temporal difference learning with adjusted $\lambda$-returns during training to reduce variance, and employing a verifier ensemble to aggregate scores during inference. Experiments on GSM8K, GSM-Plus, and MATH datasets demonstrate that our methods significantly improve reasoning accuracy and computational efficiency across four different tree search algorithms, paving the way for more practical applications of LLM-based reasoning. The code is available at https://github.com/Soistesimmer/Fetch.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Efficient Latent Semantic Clustering for Scaling Test-Time Computation of LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Latent Semantic Clustering uses a generator LLM's hidden states to group semantically equivalent outputs, removing the need for external NLI or embedding models in test-time scaling.

  2. TreeThink: A Modular Tree Search Library for Mathematical Reasoning with LLMs

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.5 of 10

    TreeThink provides a modular, asynchronous tree-search library for neural theorem proving with unified REPL clients for Lean, Rocq, and Isabelle and up to 6.3× wall-clock speedup.

  3. PATS: Process-Level Adaptive Thinking Mode Switching

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    PATS adapts the number of beam-search candidates per reasoning step using process reward model scores, improving accuracy-efficiency tradeoffs on math benchmarks.

Pith tools