REVIEW 2 cited by
COPU: Conformal Prediction for Uncertainty Quantification in Natural Language Generation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Uncertainty Quantification (UQ) for Natural Language Generation (NLG) is crucial for assessing the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs), as it reveals confidence in predictions, identifies failure modes, and gauges output reliability. Conformal Prediction (CP), a model-agnostic method that generates prediction sets with a specified error rate, has been adopted for UQ in classification tasks, where the size of the prediction set indicates the model's uncertainty. However, when adapting CP to NLG, the sampling-based method for generating candidate outputs cannot guarantee the inclusion of the ground truth, limiting its applicability across a wide range of error rates. To address this, we propose \ourmethod, a method that explicitly adds the ground truth to the candidate outputs and uses logit scores to measure nonconformity. Our experiments with six LLMs on four NLG tasks show that \ourmethod outperforms baseline methods in calibrating error rates and empirical cover rates, offering accurate UQ across a wide range of user-specified error rates.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
The Ghost Annotator: a Framework to Explore Human Label Variation in Content Moderation through Conformal Prediction
The Ghost Annotator framework applies conformal prediction and collaborative filtering representations to measure LLM divergence from human annotations across four models and datasets, revealing higher confidence in m...
-
Rule-Based Moral Principles for Explaining Uncertainty in Natural Language Generation
A virtue-labeled lookup table maps coarse uncertainty tags to canned warnings or disclaimers; the only quantitative result is 50% tag accuracy on 20 author-written prompts, with trust improvements asserted but untested.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.