Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Evaluating the Robustness of Multimodal Agents Against Active Environmental Injection Attacks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.13053 v3 pith:INPRQBWW submitted 2025-02-18 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords agentsvulnerabilitiesattackactiveaeiaattacksenvironmentalexecution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As researchers continue to optimize AI agents for more effective task execution within operating systems, they often overlook a critical security concern: the ability of these agents to detect "impostors" within their environment. Through an analysis of the agents' operational context, we identify a significant threat-attackers can disguise malicious attacks as environmental elements, injecting active disturbances into the agents' execution processes to manipulate their decision-making. We define this novel threat as the Active Environment Injection Attack (AEIA). Focusing on the interaction mechanisms of the Android OS, we conduct a risk assessment of AEIA and identify two critical security vulnerabilities: (1) Adversarial content injection in multimodal interaction interfaces, where attackers embed adversarial instructions within environmental elements to mislead agent decision-making; and (2) Reasoning gap vulnerabilities in the agent's task execution process, which increase susceptibility to AEIA attacks during reasoning. To evaluate the impact of these vulnerabilities, we propose AEIA-MN, an attack scheme that exploits interaction vulnerabilities in mobile operating systems to assess the robustness of MLLM-based agents. Experimental results show that even advanced MLLMs are highly vulnerable to this attack, achieving a maximum attack success rate of 93% on the AndroidWorld benchmark by combining two vulnerabilities.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Superplatforms Have to Attack AI Agents

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Superplatforms are predicted to launch stealth, black-box attacks on AI agents because agents threaten their ad-based gatekeeping revenue.

  2. EVA: Evolving Semantic Adversaries for Red-Teaming GUI Agents Against Environmental Injection Attacks

    cs.AI 2025-05 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    EVA evolves environmental injection payloads through a keyword-utility loop, achieving up to 80% attack success in the body's pop-up tests, while the abstract's stronger claims are not supported by the reported experiments.

  3. A Survey on Autonomy-Induced Security Risks in Large Model-Based Agents

    cs.AI 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    The paper surveys security risks of LLM agents, organizes them into a five-level autonomy taxonomy, and proposes an untested CMDP-based architecture called R2A2.

Pith tools