Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

AutoMedPrompt: A New Framework for Optimizing LLM Medical Prompts Using Textual Gradients

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.15944 v1 pith:YW2VL2AU submitted 2025-02-21 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords automedpromptmodelsllmsgradientsmethodsperformancepromptingtextual
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated increasingly sophisticated performance in medical and other fields of knowledge. Traditional methods of creating specialist LLMs require extensive fine-tuning and training of models on large datasets. Recently, prompt engineering, instead of fine-tuning, has shown potential to boost the performance of general foundation models. However, prompting methods such as chain-of-thought (CoT) may not be suitable for all subspecialty, and k-shot approaches may introduce irrelevant tokens into the context space. We present AutoMedPrompt, which explores the use of textual gradients to elicit medically relevant reasoning through system prompt optimization. AutoMedPrompt leverages TextGrad's automatic differentiation via text to improve the ability of general foundation LLMs. We evaluated AutoMedPrompt on Llama 3, an open-source LLM, using several QA benchmarks, including MedQA, PubMedQA, and the nephrology subspecialty-specific NephSAP. Our results show that prompting with textual gradients outperforms previous methods on open-source LLMs and surpasses proprietary models such as GPT-4, Claude 3 Opus, and Med-PaLM 2. AutoMedPrompt sets a new state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance on PubMedQA with an accuracy of 82.6$\%$, while also outperforming previous prompting strategies on open-sourced models for MedQA (77.7$\%$) and NephSAP (63.8$\%$).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. DoctorRAG: Medical RAG Fusing Knowledge with Patient Analogy through Textual Gradients

    cs.CL 2025-05 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    Combining knowledge retrieval, analogous patient case retrieval, and iterative textual-gradient refinement improves medical RAG accuracy across Chinese, English, and French benchmarks.

  2. Reasoning LLMs in the Medical Domain: A Literature Survey

    cs.AI 2025-08 reject

    A literature review of reasoning-LLM techniques for medicine, from CoT prompting to RL-trained medical models, with no new experiments and several placeholder citations.

Pith tools