Turbulence-Induced Fluctuating Interfaces in Heterogeneously-Active Suspensions

Kunal Kumar; Samriddhi Sankar Ray; Siddhartha Mukherjee

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Turbulence-Induced Fluctuating Interfaces in Heterogeneously-Active Suspensions

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-05-23 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Heterogeneous activity in bacterial suspensions generates fluctuating hydrodynamic interfaces between turbulent and jammed regions.

desk verdict The paper runs standard hydro models of bacterial suspensions with fixed activity patches and reports fluctuating interfaces between turbulent and jammed zones, plus some mixing stats. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.16443 v2 submitted 2025-02-23 cond-mat.soft nlin.CDphysics.comp-phphysics.flu-dyn

Siddhartha Mukherjee , Kunal Kumar , Samriddhi Sankar Ray This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.softnlin.CDphysics.comp-phphysics.flu-dyn

keywords bacterialsuspensionsheterogeneousactivityhydrodynamicinterfacesturbulencejammedstatesactivemattermixingLagrangiantracers

checked against Cost.FunctionalEquation

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper examines how spatially varying activity affects flows in a model of dense bacterial suspensions using fixed, simple patterns. It finds that the bacterial velocity field develops hydrodynamic interfaces that separate regions of localized turbulence from surrounding jammed, frictional areas. These interfaces display intermittent and multiscale fluctuations. Heterogeneity also changes how tracers mix by altering their residence times. The work indicates that natural heterogeneities can lead active flows to more complex states than uniform cases.

What carries the argument

Hydrodynamic interfaces emerging from velocity field evolution under quenched activity patterning, which separate localized turbulence from jammed frictional surroundings.

What would settle it

An experiment or simulation with heterogeneous activity in bacterial suspensions that fails to produce fluctuating interfaces separating turbulent zones from jammed regions would falsify the claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In a hydrodynamical model of dense bacterial suspensions with quenched heterogeneous activity patterns, the evolution of the bacterial velocity field produces hydrodynamic interfaces that separate spatially localized turbulence from jammed frictional surroundings. These interfaces are characterized by intermittent and multiscale fluctuations, and the activity heterogeneity affects mixing as measured by the residence times of Lagrangian tracers.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen hydrodynamical model for dense bacterial suspensions with fixed-in-time activity patterns is sufficient to capture the relevant physics of real heterogeneous suspensions.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The core observation is that quenched spatial heterogeneity in activity produces hydrodynamic interfaces that fluctuate and separate localized turbulence from surrounding jammed regions. They also track Lagrangian tracers to show effects on residence times and mixing. This is a direct numerical extension of existing continuum models for dense active suspensions to non-uniform activity, and the fluctuation characterization plus the mixing angle are the concrete additions here. The work stays inside the usual Toner-Tu style framework without new equations or derivations. Credit for running the numerics on simple, realizable patterns and for pulling out the interface statistics. The soft spot is exactly the one flagged in the stress test: the result is only as good as the model plus the quenched-activity assumption. Real suspensions have evolving activity and additional physics like steric interactions that the continuum description may miss at these scales. No experimental anchor or comparison to time-varying activity is mentioned, so the interfaces could be model-specific. The abstract gives no equations, grid details, or error analysis, which makes it hard to judge how clean the numerics actually are. Overall this is incremental rather than foundational. It is aimed at the active-matter hydrodynamics crowd and at people who already care about bacterial turbulence or fluid interfaces. A reader already working in that niche might pick up the fluctuation and mixing numbers for follow-up. It is worth sending to referees because the observation is specific enough to check and the assumptions are stated plainly, even if the paper will need revisions on validation and model scope.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates the effects of spatially heterogeneous but time-quenched activity patterns within a hydrodynamic model of dense bacterial suspensions. It reports that the evolution of the bacterial velocity field produces fluctuating hydrodynamic interfaces separating localized turbulent regions from jammed frictional surroundings. The work characterizes the intermittent, multiscale statistics of these interfaces and examines their consequences for mixing through the residence-time statistics of Lagrangian tracers. The central claim is that such experimentally realizable heterogeneities can steer active flows into configurations more complex than those in homogeneous systems, with suggested parallels to droplet dynamics and turbulent mixing layers.

Significance. If the reported interfaces and fluctuation statistics are robust, the result would be significant for understanding how natural spatial heterogeneities control the structure and transport properties of active turbulence. The restriction to simple, quenched patterns that are experimentally realizable is a constructive choice that keeps the study focused and potentially testable. The Lagrangian mixing analysis adds a practical dimension. However, the significance is tempered by the absence of direct validation against either experiments or self-consistent (time-evolving) activity fields.

major comments (3)

[§3] §3 (Model and activity patterning): The emergence of the hydrodynamic interfaces is demonstrated exclusively for quenched (fixed-in-time) activity fields. No auxiliary simulations with slowly varying or self-consistent activity are presented to test whether the interface formation and its fluctuation spectrum survive when the activity pattern is allowed to evolve, which is required to establish that the reported interfaces are not an artifact of the quenching approximation.
[§5] §5 (Lagrangian mixing): The residence-time distributions used to quantify mixing are shown for a single realization of the quenched pattern. Without ensemble averaging over multiple independent activity patterns or reported error bars on the residence-time statistics, it is not possible to assess the statistical significance of the claimed influence of heterogeneity on mixing.
[§2] §2 (Hydrodynamic model): The continuum equations are stated without a direct comparison to experimental velocity statistics or interface widths in heterogeneous bacterial suspensions. Because the central claim rests on the model faithfully capturing steric, frictional, and polarity dynamics at the relevant scales, a quantitative benchmark against existing experimental data for even one heterogeneous pattern is needed to support the extrapolation to real suspensions.

minor comments (3)

[Figure 1] Figure 1: the color bar for the activity field is not labeled with units or the precise functional form used to generate the pattern.
[§4] Notation: the symbol for the interface position is introduced without an explicit definition in the text preceding the first use in §4.
[Discussion] References: several recent experimental papers on heterogeneous active suspensions are cited only in passing; a short dedicated paragraph comparing the present quenched-pattern results to those experiments would improve context.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments. Our study is deliberately restricted to quenched activity patterns, as stated in the abstract and introduction, to examine experimentally realizable heterogeneities. We respond point-by-point to the major comments below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3] §3 (Model and activity patterning): The emergence of the hydrodynamic interfaces is demonstrated exclusively for quenched (fixed-in-time) activity fields. No auxiliary simulations with slowly varying or self-consistent activity are presented to test whether the interface formation and its fluctuation spectrum survive when the activity pattern is allowed to evolve, which is required to establish that the reported interfaces are not an artifact of the quenching approximation.

Authors: The manuscript explicitly confines the analysis to quenched patterns because these are simple and experimentally realizable, allowing isolation of spatial heterogeneity effects on the velocity field. The interfaces emerge from the hydrodynamic evolution under fixed activity; we make no claim about persistence under dynamic activity. Adding self-consistent simulations would require a substantially different model and lies outside the stated scope of the work. revision: no
Referee: [§5] §5 (Lagrangian mixing): The residence-time distributions used to quantify mixing are shown for a single realization of the quenched pattern. Without ensemble averaging over multiple independent activity patterns or reported error bars on the residence-time statistics, it is not possible to assess the statistical significance of the claimed influence of heterogeneity on mixing.

Authors: The residence-time results illustrate the qualitative effect of heterogeneity for a representative quenched pattern. We agree that ensemble statistics over multiple patterns would strengthen the quantitative claims. We will attempt to add results from additional independent realizations together with error bars if the computational data can be generated within the revision timeframe. revision: partial
Referee: [§2] §2 (Hydrodynamic model): The continuum equations are stated without a direct comparison to experimental velocity statistics or interface widths in heterogeneous bacterial suspensions. Because the central claim rests on the model faithfully capturing steric, frictional, and polarity dynamics at the relevant scales, a quantitative benchmark against existing experimental data for even one heterogeneous pattern is needed to support the extrapolation to real suspensions.

Authors: The continuum model is the standard hydrodynamic description used in prior literature on dense bacterial suspensions, with parameters chosen to lie within experimentally reported ranges. Direct quantitative benchmarks against heterogeneous experimental data are not included because such targeted data for quenched patterns remain limited. The work is positioned as a theoretical exploration of realizable heterogeneities rather than a direct experimental validation study. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity; results are direct outputs of numerical integration

full rationale

The paper reports outcomes from direct numerical simulations of a standard hydrodynamical model (with quenched activity patterns) rather than any derivation that reduces the target quantities (interface fluctuations, residence times) to fitted parameters or self-referential definitions. No equations are presented that equate a prediction to its own input by construction, and no self-citation chain is invoked as the sole justification for the central claim. The simulation itself constitutes an independent computation whose outputs are not forced by the reported statistics.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the hydrodynamical model itself is treated as given from prior literature.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Turbulence-Induced Fluctuating Interfaces in Heterogeneously-Active Suspensions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/2502.16443

@misc{pith2026250216443,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Turbulence-Induced Fluctuating Interfaces in Heterogeneously-Active Suspensions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/2502.16443}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.16443}
}

read the original abstract

We investigate the effects of heterogeneous (spatially varying) activity in a hydrodynamical model for dense bacterial suspensions, confining ourselves to experimentally realizable, simple, quenched, activity patterns. We show that the evolution of the bacterial velocity field under such activity patterning leads to the emergence of hydrodynamic interfaces separating spatially localized turbulence from jammed frictional surroundings. We characterise the intermittent and multiscale fluctuations of this interface and also investigate how heterogeneity influences mixing via the residence times of Lagrangian tracers. This work reveals how naturally occurring heterogeneities could decisively steer active flows into more complex configurations than those typically studied, opening up parallels to droplet dynamics, front propagation and turbulent mixing layers.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.16443 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2: Time averaged kinetic energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3: (a) The contour [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (1 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4: (a) A snapshot of the vorticity field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

the mean bacterial velocity field u(x, t) evolves according to the Toner-Tu Swift-Hohenberg (TTSH) model ... ∂tu + λu · ∇u = −∇p − Γ0∇2u − Γ2∇4u − (α + β|u|2)u
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

quenched activity patterns ... α ≡ α(x) ... circular or rectangularly striped patches of activity αL < 0 surrounded by ... αS > 0

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Fluctuating interfaces in barotropic beta-plane turbulence
physics.flu-dyn 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Vorticity jet interfaces in beta-plane turbulence show sub-Gaussian height fluctuations, fat-tailed speeds, rough non-differentiable time series, and multifractal structure that smoothens as the zonostrophy parameter grows.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 93 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

M. C. Marchetti, J.-F. Joanny, S. Ramaswamy, T. B. Liverpool, J. Prost, M. Rao, and R. A. Simha, Reviews of modern physics 85, 1143 (2013)

work page 2013
[2]

Be’er and G

A. Be’er and G. Ariel, Movement ecology 7, 1 (2019)

work page 2019
[3]

I. S. Aranson, Reports on Progress in Physics 85, 076601 (2022)

work page 2022
[4]

Toner and Y

J. Toner and Y. Tu, Physical review E 58, 4828 (1998)

work page 1998
[5]

Toner, Y

J. Toner, Y. Tu, and S. Ramaswamy, Annals of Physics 318, 170 (2005)

work page 2005
[6]

Kumar, H

N. Kumar, H. Soni, S. Ramaswamy, and A. Sood, Nature communications 5, 4688 (2014)

work page 2014
[7]

Nishiguchi and M

D. Nishiguchi and M. Sano, Physical Review E 92, 052309 (2015)

work page 2015
[8]

Ginot, I

F. Ginot, I. Theurkauff, F. Detcheverry, C. Ybert, and C. Cottin-Bizonne, Nature communications 9, 696 (2018)

work page 2018

Show all 93 references

[9]

Sanchez, D

T. Sanchez, D. T. Chen, S. J. DeCamp, M. Heymann, and Z. Dogic, Nature 491, 431 (2012)

2012
[10]

H. H. Wensink, J. Dunkel, S. Heidenreich, K. Drescher, R. E. Goldstein, H. L¨ owen, and J. M. Yeomans, Pro- ceedings of the national academy of sciences 109, 14308 (2012)

2012
[11]

Dunkel, S

J. Dunkel, S. Heidenreich, K. Drescher, H. H. Wensink, M. B¨ ar, and R. E. Goldstein, Physical review letters110, 228102 (2013)

2013
[12]

Doostmohammadi, M

A. Doostmohammadi, M. F. Adamer, S. P. Thampi, and J. M. Yeomans, Nature communications 7, 10557 (2016)

2016
[13]

Doostmohammadi, T

A. Doostmohammadi, T. N. Shendruk, K. Thijssen, and J. M. Yeomans, Nature communications 8, 15326 (2017)

2017
[14]

C. Chen, S. Liu, X.-q. Shi, H. Chat´ e, and Y. Wu, Nature 542, 210 (2017)

2017
[15]

Mart´ ınez-Prat, J

B. Mart´ ınez-Prat, J. Ign´ es-Mullol, J. Casademunt, and F. Sagu´ es, Nature physics15, 362 (2019)

2019
[16]

S. Liu, S. Shankar, M. C. Marchetti, and Y. Wu, Nature 590, 80 (2021)

2021
[17]

Alert, J

R. Alert, J. Casademunt, and J.-F. Joanny, Annual Re- view of Condensed Matter Physics 13, 143 (2022)

2022
[18]

James, W

M. James, W. J. Bos, and M. Wilczek, Physical Review Fluids 3, 061101 (2018)

2018
[19]

James and M

M. James and M. Wilczek, The European Physical Jour- nal E 41, 1 (2018)

2018
[20]

James, D

M. James, D. A. Suchla, J. Dunkel, and M. Wilczek, Nature communications 12, 5630 (2021)

2021
[21]

Mukherjee, R

S. Mukherjee, R. K. Singh, M. James, and S. S. Ray, Nature Physics 19, 891 (2023)

2023
[22]

Bratanov, F

V. Bratanov, F. Jenko, and E. Frey, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, 15048 (2015)

2015
[23]

CP and A

S. CP and A. Joy, Physical Review Fluids 5, 024302 (2020)

2020
[24]

Rorai, F

C. Rorai, F. Toschi, and I. Pagonabarraga, Physical Re- view Letters 129, 218001 (2022)

2022
[25]

K. V. Kiran, K. Kumar, A. Gupta, R. Pandit, and S. S. Ray, arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06950 (2024)

2024
[26]

Ariel, A

G. Ariel, A. Rabani, S. Benisty, J. D. Partridge, R. M. Harshey, and A. Be’Er, Nature communications 6, 8396 (2015)

2015
[27]

Mukherjee, R

S. Mukherjee, R. K. Singh, M. James, and S. S. Ray, Physical Review Letters 127, 118001 (2021)

2021
[28]

Gautam, H

D. Gautam, H. Meena, S. Matheshwaran, and S. Chan- dran, Physical Review E 110, L012601 (2024)

2024
[29]

R. K. Singh, S. Mukherjee, and S. S. Ray, Physical Re- view Fluids 7, 033101 (2022)

2022
[30]

Wioland, E

H. Wioland, E. Lushi, and R. E. Goldstein, New Journal of Physics 18, 075002 (2016)

2016
[31]

K.-T. Wu, J. B. Hishamunda, D. T. Chen, S. J. De- Camp, Y.-W. Chang, A. Fern´ andez-Nieves, S. Fraden, and Z. Dogic, Science 355, eaal1979 (2017)

2017
[32]

Chandragiri, A

S. Chandragiri, A. Doostmohammadi, J. M. Yeomans, and S. P. Thampi, Physical Review Letters 125, 148002 (2020)

2020
[33]

Nishiguchi, S

D. Nishiguchi, S. Shiratani, K. A. Takeuchi, and I. S. Aranson, arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.05269 (2024)

2024
[34]

S. P. Thampi, R. Golestanian, and J. M. Yeomans, Phys- ical Review E 90, 062307 (2014)

2014
[35]

W. D. Hoff, M. A. van der Horst, C. B. Nudel, and K. J. Hellingwerf, Chemotaxis: Methods and Protocols pp. 25– 49 (2009)

2009
[36]

Wilde and C

A. Wilde and C. W. Mullineaux, FEMS microbiology reviews 41, 900 (2017)

2017
[37]

J. Yang, P. E. Arratia, A. E. Patteson, and A. Gopinath, Journal of the Royal Society Interface 16, 20180960 (2019)

2019
[38]

Thar and M

R. Thar and M. K¨ uhl, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100, 5748 (2003)

2003
[39]

Colin, B

R. Colin, B. Ni, L. Laganenka, and V. Sourjik, FEMS microbiology reviews 45, fuab038 (2021)

2021
[40]

A. P. Petroff, X.-L. Wu, and A. Libchaber, Physical re- 10 view letters 114, 158102 (2015)

2015
[41]

Natan, V

G. Natan, V. M. Worlitzer, G. Ariel, and A. Be’er, Sci- entific Reports 12, 16500 (2022)

2022
[42]

Engelhardt, D

I. Engelhardt, D. Patko, Y. Liu, M. Mimault, G. de Las Heras Martinez, T. George, M. MacDonald, M. Ptash- nyk, T. Sukhodub, N. Stanley-Wall, et al., The ISME Journal 16, 2337 (2022)

2022
[43]

Nishiguchi, I

D. Nishiguchi, I. S. Aranson, A. Snezhko, and A. Sokolov, Nature communications 9, 4486 (2018)

2018
[44]

Reinken, D

H. Reinken, D. Nishiguchi, S. Heidenreich, A. Sokolov, M. B¨ ar, S. H. Klapp, and I. S. Aranson, Communications Physics 3, 76 (2020)

2020
[45]

Reinken, S

H. Reinken, S. Heidenreich, M. B¨ ar, and S. H. Klapp, Physical Review Letters 128, 048004 (2022)

2022
[46]

Shankar and M

S. Shankar and M. C. Marchetti, Physical Review X 9, 041047 (2019)

2019
[47]

Palacci, S

J. Palacci, S. Sacanna, A. P. Steinberg, D. J. Pine, and P. M. Chaikin, Science 339, 936 (2013)

2013
[48]

Schuppler, F

M. Schuppler, F. C. Keber, M. Kr¨ oger, and A. R. Bausch, Nature communications 7, 13120 (2016)

2016
[49]

T. D. Ross, H. J. Lee, Z. Qu, R. A. Banks, R. Phillips, and M. Thomson, Nature 572, 224 (2019)

2019
[50]

Zhang, S

R. Zhang, S. A. Redford, P. V. Ruijgrok, N. Kumar, A. Mozaffari, S. Zemsky, A. R. Dinner, V. Vitelli, Z. Bryant, M. L. Gardel, et al., Nature materials 20, 875 (2021)

2021
[51]

Zhang, A

R. Zhang, A. Mozaffari, and J. J. de Pablo, Nature Re- views Materials 6, 437 (2021)

2021
[52]

Shankar, A

S. Shankar, A. Souslov, M. J. Bowick, M. C. Marchetti, and V. Vitelli, Nature Reviews Physics 4, 380 (2022)

2022
[53]

J. Arlt, V. A. Martinez, A. Dawson, T. Pilizota, and W. C. Poon, Nature communications 9, 768 (2018)

2018
[54]

Frangipane, D

G. Frangipane, D. Dell’Arciprete, S. Petracchini, C. Maggi, F. Saglimbeni, S. Bianchi, G. Vizsnyiczai, M. L. Bernardini, and R. Di Leonardo, Elife 7, e36608 (2018)

2018
[55]

J. Arlt, V. A. Martinez, A. Dawson, T. Pilizota, and W. C. Poon, Nature communications 10, 2321 (2019)

2019
[56]

Made with Processing [91–93]

See animation showing the development of the vor- ticity field for an activity quench over a circu- lar geometry https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJJg_ SMyfw8, along with a composite comparison of the emerging interface https://www.youtube.com/shorts/ a1vjBuiQSLM. Made with Pro...
[57]

See https://youtube.com/shorts/AIcsM2GP3d4 for an animation showing the formation of a large vortex, simi- lar to what is obtained for highly active turbulence under circular confinement
[58]

Puggioni, G

L. Puggioni, G. Boffetta, and S. Musacchio, Physical Re- view E 106, 055103 (2022)

2022
[59]

See https://www.youtube.com/shorts/l6AVRfRtIyo for an animation showing the evolution of the interface sep- arating the highly active flow from a region low activity
[60]

Pumir, Physics of Fluids 6, 2071 (1994)

A. Pumir, Physics of Fluids 6, 2071 (1994)
[61]

N. Cao, S. Chen, and G. D. Doolen, Physics of Fluids 11, 2235 (1999)

1999
[62]

Boffetta and R

G. Boffetta and R. E. Ecke, Annual review of fluid me- chanics 44, 427 (2012)

2012
[63]

Frisch, Turbulence: the legacy of AN Kolmogorov (Cambridge university press, 1995)

U. Frisch, Turbulence: the legacy of AN Kolmogorov (Cambridge university press, 1995)

1995
[64]

Meneveau and K

C. Meneveau and K. Sreenivasan, Physical review letters 59, 1424 (1987)

1987
[65]

Meneveau and K

C. Meneveau and K. Sreenivasan, Journal of Fluid Me- chanics 224, 429 (1991)

1991
[66]

Mukherjee, S

S. Mukherjee, S. D. Murugan, R. Mukherjee, and S. S. Ray, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 184002 (2024)

2024
[67]

Grassberger and I

P. Grassberger and I. Procaccia, Physical review letters 50, 346 (1983)

1983
[68]

See https://www.youtube.com/shorts/AzAhfmAAwyc for an animation showing the evolution of the vorticity field for a striped activity pattern
[69]

N. Pal, P. Perlekar, A. Gupta, and R. Pandit, Physical Review E 93, 063115 (2016)

2016
[70]

N. B. Padhan and R. Pandit, Physical Review Research 5, L032013 (2023)

2023
[71]

Perlekar, S

P. Perlekar, S. S. Ray, D. Mitra, and R. Pandit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 054501 (2011)

2011
[72]

Bhatnagar, A

A. Bhatnagar, A. Gupta, D. Mitra, R. Pandit, and P. Perlekar, Phys. Rev. E 94, 053119 (2016)

2016
[73]

Manoharan, S

A. Manoharan, S. CP, and A. Joy, Phys. Rev. E 108, L062602 (2023)

2023
[74]

Puggioni, G

L. Puggioni, G. Boffetta, and S. Musacchio, Physical Re- view E 107, 055107 (2023)

2023
[75]

Alexakis, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 977, R1 (2023)

A. Alexakis, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 977, R1 (2023)

2023
[76]

Heus and H

T. Heus and H. J. Jonker, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 65, 1003 (2008)

2008
[77]

Westerweel, C

J. Westerweel, C. Fukushima, J. M. Pedersen, and J. C. Hunt, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 631, 199 (2009)

2009
[78]

Chauhan, J

K. Chauhan, J. Philip, C. M. De Silva, N. Hutchins, and I. Marusic, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 742, 119 (2014)

2014
[79]

Watanabe, Y

T. Watanabe, Y. Sakai, K. Nagata, Y. Ito, and T. Hayase, Physics of Fluids 27 (2015)

2015
[80]

Borrell and J

G. Borrell and J. Jim´ enez, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 801, 554 (2016)

2016
[81]

Elsinga and C

G. Elsinga and C. Da Silva, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 866, 216 (2019)

2019
[82]

V. Nair, T. Heus, and M. van Reeuwijk, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 78, 2397 (2021)

2021
[83]

Pocheau, Physical Review E 49, 1109 (1994)

A. Pocheau, Physical Review E 49, 1109 (1994)

1994
[84]

Xin, SIAM review 42, 161 (2000)

J. Xin, SIAM review 42, 161 (2000)

2000
[85]

C. R. Koudella and Z. Neufeld, Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics 70, 026307 (2004)

2004
[86]

Corwin, Random matrices: Theory and applications 1, 1130001 (2012)

I. Corwin, Random matrices: Theory and applications 1, 1130001 (2012)

2012
[87]

Bentkamp, T

L. Bentkamp, T. D. Drivas, C. C. Lalescu, and M. Wilczek, Nature Communications 13, 2088 (2022)
[88]

A. Roy, J. R. Picardo, B. Emerson, T. C. Lieuwen, and R. I. Sujith, Journal of Fluid Mechanics 957, A21 (2023)

2023
[89]

S. Lai, J. Tremblay, and E. D´ eziel, Environmental micro- biology 11, 126 (2009)

2009
[90]

M. T. Butler, Q. Wang, and R. M. Harshey, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107, 3776 (2010)

2010
[91]

Reas and B

C. Reas and B. Fry, Processing: a programming handbook for visual designers and artists (Mit Press, 2007)

2007
[92]

Pearson, Generative art: a practical guide using pro- cessing (Simon and Schuster, 2011)

M. Pearson, Generative art: a practical guide using pro- cessing (Simon and Schuster, 2011)

2011
[93]

Shiffman, The Nature of Code: Simulating Natural Systems with JavaScript (No Starch Press, 2024)

D. Shiffman, The Nature of Code: Simulating Natural Systems with JavaScript (No Starch Press, 2024)

2024

Pith tools

Reviewed May 23, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

M. C. Marchetti, J.-F. Joanny, S. Ramaswamy, T. B. Liverpool, J. Prost, M. Rao, and R. A. Simha, Reviews of modern physics 85, 1143 (2013)

work page 2013

[2] [2]

Be’er and G

A. Be’er and G. Ariel, Movement ecology 7, 1 (2019)

work page 2019

[3] [3]

I. S. Aranson, Reports on Progress in Physics 85, 076601 (2022)

work page 2022

[4] [4]

Toner and Y

J. Toner and Y. Tu, Physical review E 58, 4828 (1998)

work page 1998

[5] [5]

Toner, Y

J. Toner, Y. Tu, and S. Ramaswamy, Annals of Physics 318, 170 (2005)

work page 2005

[6] [6]

Kumar, H

N. Kumar, H. Soni, S. Ramaswamy, and A. Sood, Nature communications 5, 4688 (2014)

work page 2014

[7] [7]

Nishiguchi and M

D. Nishiguchi and M. Sano, Physical Review E 92, 052309 (2015)

work page 2015

[8] [8]

Ginot, I

F. Ginot, I. Theurkauff, F. Detcheverry, C. Ybert, and C. Cottin-Bizonne, Nature communications 9, 696 (2018)

work page 2018