Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

GraphCheck: Breaking Long-Term Text Barriers with Extracted Knowledge Graph-Powered Fact-Checking

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.16514 v4 pith:QJRTBYZZ submitted 2025-02-23 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords fact-checkinggraphcheckerrorsexistingknowledgellmsmethodsoften
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are widely used, but they often generate subtle factual errors, especially in long-form text. These errors are fatal in some specialized domains such as medicine. Existing fact-checking with grounding documents methods face two main challenges: (1) they struggle to understand complex multihop relations in long documents, often overlooking subtle factual errors; (2) most specialized methods rely on pairwise comparisons, requiring multiple model calls, leading to high resource and computational costs. To address these challenges, we propose GraphCheck, a fact-checking framework that uses extracted knowledge graphs to enhance text representation. Graph Neural Networks further process these graphs as a soft prompt, enabling LLMs to incorporate structured knowledge more effectively. Enhanced with graph-based reasoning, GraphCheck captures multihop reasoning chains that are often overlooked by existing methods, enabling precise and efficient fact-checking in a single inference call. Experimental results on seven benchmarks spanning both general and medical domains demonstrate up to a 7.1% overall improvement over baseline models. Notably, GraphCheck outperforms existing specialized fact-checkers and achieves comparable performance with state-of-the-art LLMs, such as DeepSeek-V3 and OpenAI-o1, with significantly fewer parameters.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LLMs for Customized Marketing Content Generation and Evaluation at Scale

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    MarketingFM generates e-commerce ad copy with RAG and an LLM; AutoEval uses LLM-as-a-Judge plus rule checks and self-refines its prompts, with online tests showing significant clicks and impressions lifts but no signi...

  2. Mitigating hallucinations in healthcare LLMs with granular fact-checking and domain-specific adaptation

    cs.CL 2025-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A deterministic, proposition-level fact-checker that compares clinical summaries against electronic health records via (entity, attribute, value, time) claims and hard-coded logical checks reports 0.8904 precision and...

Pith tools