REVIEW 2 cited by
The Lookahead Limitation: Why Multi-Operand Addition is Hard for LLMs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Autoregressive large language models (LLMs) exhibit impressive performance across various tasks but struggle with simple arithmetic, such as addition of two or more operands. We show that this struggle arises from LLMs' use of a simple one-digit lookahead heuristic, which works fairly well (but not perfect) for two-operand addition but fails in multi-operand cases, where the carry-over logic is more complex. Our probing experiments and digit-wise accuracy evaluation show that LLMs fail precisely where a one-digit lookahead is insufficient to account for cascading carries. We analyze the impact of tokenization strategies on arithmetic performance and show that all investigated models, regardless of tokenization, are inherently limited in the addition of multiple operands due to their reliance on a one-digit lookahead heuristic. Our findings reveal fundamental limitations that prevent LLMs from generalizing to more complex numerical reasoning.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Smart-TCP: An Agentic AI-based Autonomous and Adaptive TCP Protocol
An LLM with a deterministic arithmetic tool can drive TCP state/flag decisions and complete simulated sessions, where pure LLMs cannot.
-
Modular Arithmetic: Language Models Solve Math Digit by Digit
LLMs perform 3-digit addition and subtraction via digit-position-specific MLP circuits that can be intervened upon to change individual output digits.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.