REVIEW 1 cited by
Joint Modeling in Recommendations: A Survey
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
In today's digital landscape, Deep Recommender Systems (DRS) play a crucial role in navigating and customizing online content for individual preferences. However, conventional methods, which mainly depend on single recommendation task, scenario, data modality and user behavior, are increasingly seen as insufficient due to their inability to accurately reflect users' complex and changing preferences. This gap underscores the need for joint modeling approaches, which are central to overcoming these limitations by integrating diverse tasks, scenarios, modalities, and behaviors in the recommendation process, thus promising significant enhancements in recommendation precision, efficiency, and customization. In this paper, we comprehensively survey the joint modeling methods in recommendations. We begin by defining the scope of joint modeling through four distinct dimensions: multi-task, multi-scenario, multi-modal, and multi-behavior modeling. Subsequently, we examine these methods in depth, identifying and summarizing their underlying paradigms based on the latest advancements and potential research trajectories. Ultimately, we highlight several promising avenues for future exploration in joint modeling for recommendations and provide a concise conclusion to our findings.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A Multistakeholder Approach to Value-Driven Co-Design of Recommender System Evaluation Metrics in Digital Archives
A qualitative study translates stakeholder values from digital archives focus groups into a four-stage research funnel and eight proposed recommender evaluation metric directions.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.