Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

State-Dependent Conformal Perception Bounds for Neuro-Symbolic Verification of Autonomous Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.21308 v2 pith:PJXK3Q7Z submitted 2025-02-28 eess.SY cs.SY

classification eess.SYcs.SY
keywords boundsperceptionerrorsafetyverificationapproachautonomousconformal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

It remains a challenge to provide safety guarantees for autonomous systems with neural perception and control. A typical approach obtains symbolic bounds on perception error (e.g., using conformal prediction) and performs verification under these bounds. However, these bounds can lead to drastic conservatism in the resulting end-to-end safety guarantee. This paper proposes an approach to synthesize symbolic perception error bounds that serve as an optimal interface between perception performance and control verification. The key idea is to consider our error bounds to be heteroskedastic with respect to the system's state -- not time like in previous approaches. These bounds can be obtained with two gradient-free optimization algorithms. We demonstrate that our bounds lead to tighter safety guarantees than the state-of-the-art in a case study on a mountain car.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Conformal Safety Shielding for Imperfect-Perception Agents

    eess.SY 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper introduces a conformal prediction-based shield for imperfect-perception agents and proves a global safety bound only for the simpler perfect-perception case.

  2. Towards Unified Probabilistic Verification and Validation of Vision-Based Autonomy

    eess.SY 2025-08 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A pipeline that turns collected runs of a vision-based controller into an interval MDP, verifies a safety lower bound, and reuses Bayesian conformance to extend the bound to new environments.

Pith tools