Pith. sign in

REVIEW

SGA-INTERACT: A 3D Skeleton-based Benchmark for Group Activity Understanding in Modern Basketball Tactic

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.06522 v1 pith:QAJL2P3Y submitted 2025-03-09 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords activitygroupunderstandingbenchmarksga-interactskeleton-basedframeworkmethods
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Group Activity Understanding is predominantly studied as Group Activity Recognition (GAR) task. However, existing GAR benchmarks suffer from coarse-grained activity vocabularies and the only data form in single-view, which hinder the evaluation of state-of-the-art algorithms. To address these limitations, we introduce SGA-INTERACT, the first 3D skeleton-based benchmark for group activity understanding. It features complex activities inspired by basketball tactics, emphasizing rich spatial interactions and long-term dependencies. SGA-INTERACT introduces Temporal Group Activity Localization (TGAL) task, extending group activity understanding to untrimmed sequences, filling the gap left by GAR as a standalone task. In addition to the benchmark, we propose One2Many, a novel framework that employs a pretrained 3D skeleton backbone for unified individual feature extraction. This framework aligns with the feature extraction paradigm in RGB-based methods, enabling direct evaluation of RGB-based models on skeleton-based benchmarks. We conduct extensive evaluations on SGA-INTERACT using two skeleton-based methods, three RGB-based methods, and a proposed baseline within the One2Many framework. The general low performance of baselines highlights the benchmark's challenges, motivating advancements in group activity understanding.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools