REVIEW 1 cited by
Why LLMs Cannot Think and How to Fix It
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
This paper elucidates that current state-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs) are fundamentally incapable of making decisions or developing "thoughts" within the feature space due to their architectural constraints. We establish a definition of "thought" that encompasses traditional understandings of that term and adapt it for application to LLMs. We demonstrate that the architectural design and language modeling training methodology of contemporary LLMs inherently preclude them from engaging in genuine thought processes. Our primary focus is on this theoretical realization rather than practical insights derived from experimental data. Finally, we propose solutions to enable thought processes within the feature space and discuss the broader implications of these architectural modifications.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Roll the dice & look before you leap: Going beyond the creative limits of next-token prediction
On four minimal graph-construction tasks, multi-token training (teacherless or diffusion) produces more diverse and original outputs than next-token training, and random seed prefixes can replace temperature as a dive...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.