Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

VERIFY: A Benchmark of Visual Explanation and Reasoning for Investigating Multimodal Reasoning Fidelity

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.11557 v1 pith:5ZJGW6YG submitted 2025-03-14 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords reasoningvisualmllmsverifyassessbenchmarkcapabilitiescritical
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Visual reasoning is central to human cognition, enabling individuals to interpret and abstractly understand their environment. Although recent Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated impressive performance across language and vision-language tasks, existing benchmarks primarily measure recognition-based skills and inadequately assess true visual reasoning capabilities. To bridge this critical gap, we introduce VERIFY, a benchmark explicitly designed to isolate and rigorously evaluate the visual reasoning capabilities of state-of-the-art MLLMs. VERIFY compels models to reason primarily from visual information, providing minimal textual context to reduce reliance on domain-specific knowledge and linguistic biases. Each problem is accompanied by a human-annotated reasoning path, making it the first to provide in-depth evaluation of model decision-making processes. Additionally, we propose novel metrics that assess visual reasoning fidelity beyond mere accuracy, highlighting critical imbalances in current model reasoning patterns. Our comprehensive benchmarking of leading MLLMs uncovers significant limitations, underscoring the need for a balanced and holistic approach to both perception and reasoning. For more teaser and testing, visit our project page (https://verify-eqh.pages.dev/).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. LENS: Adaptive Spatio-Temporal Zooming for Keyframe Sampling in Long-Form Videos

    cs.CV 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Adaptive allocation of a limited frame budget between CLIP-prompted spatial zoom-ins and graph-based temporal hyperframes beats prior keyframe samplers on long-video MLLM benchmarks.

  2. Seeing is Not Reasoning: MVPBench for Graph-based Evaluation of Multi-path Visual Physical CoT

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new multi-image benchmark and graph-based scoring method show that MLLMs produce weak, poorly-grounded chains of thought on visual physics tasks, and that RL post-training can degrade spatial reasoning.

  3. OCR-Reasoning Benchmark: Unveiling the True Capabilities of MLLMs in Complex Text-Rich Image Reasoning

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    OCR-Reasoning, a 1,069-question benchmark with reasoning-chain annotations for text-rich images, finds that no evaluated multimodal model surpasses 50% accuracy.

Pith tools