Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

MDTeamGPT: A Self-Evolving LLM-based Multi-Agent Framework for Multi-Disciplinary Team Medical Consultation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.13856 v1 pith:IVSZQVYN submitted 2025-03-18 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords frameworkknowledgemedicalconsultationconsultationsexperienceaccuracybase
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) have made significant progress in various fields. However, challenges remain in Multi-Disciplinary Team (MDT) medical consultations. Current research enhances reasoning through role assignment, task decomposition, and accumulation of medical experience. Multi-role collaboration in MDT consultations often results in excessively long dialogue histories. This increases the model's cognitive burden and degrades both efficiency and accuracy. Some methods only store treatment histories. They do not extract effective experience or reflect on errors. This limits knowledge generalization and system evolution. We propose a multi-agent MDT medical consultation framework based on LLMs to address these issues. Our framework uses consensus aggregation and a residual discussion structure for multi-round consultations. It also employs a Correct Answer Knowledge Base (CorrectKB) and a Chain-of-Thought Knowledge Base (ChainKB) to accumulate consultation experience. These mechanisms enable the framework to evolve and continually improve diagnosis rationality and accuracy. Experimental results on the MedQA and PubMedQA datasets demonstrate that our framework achieves accuracies of 90.1% and 83.9%, respectively, and that the constructed knowledge bases generalize effectively across test sets from both datasets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. MedSentry: Understanding and Mitigating Safety Risks in Medical LLM Multi-Agent Systems

    cs.MA 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 5,000-prompt medical safety benchmark reveals that decentralized LLM multi-agent teams resist a malicious insider agent better than shared-pool teams, and a personality-screening defense partially restores safety.

  2. TAGS: A Test-Time Generalist-Specialist Framework with Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning and Verification

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Without any parameter updates, a retrieval-augmented generalist-specialist agent pair with consistency-based verification raises accuracy on 862 hard medical QA questions for GPT-4o, DeepSeek-R1, and Qwen2.5-7B.

  3. The Path to Self-Evolving Clinical Systems: Scaling Medical Agents from Assistance to Autonomy

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.5 of 10

    Medical agents should be scaled mainly by richer clinical environments and self-evolution loops, not parameter growth alone, under a three-level autonomy taxonomy.

  4. Reasoning LLMs in the Medical Domain: A Literature Survey

    cs.AI 2025-08 reject

    A literature review of reasoning-LLM techniques for medicine, from CoT prompting to RL-trained medical models, with no new experiments and several placeholder citations.

Pith tools