REVIEW 4 cited by
LEGION: Learning to Ground and Explain for Synthetic Image Detection
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The rapid advancements in generative technology have emerged as a double-edged sword. While offering powerful tools that enhance convenience, they also pose significant social concerns. As defenders, current synthetic image detection methods often lack artifact-level textual interpretability and are overly focused on image manipulation detection, and current datasets usually suffer from outdated generators and a lack of fine-grained annotations. In this paper, we introduce SynthScars, a high-quality and diverse dataset consisting of 12,236 fully synthetic images with human-expert annotations. It features 4 distinct image content types, 3 categories of artifacts, and fine-grained annotations covering pixel-level segmentation, detailed textual explanations, and artifact category labels. Furthermore, we propose LEGION (LEarning to Ground and explain for Synthetic Image detectiON), a multimodal large language model (MLLM)-based image forgery analysis framework that integrates artifact detection, segmentation, and explanation. Building upon this capability, we further explore LEGION as a controller, integrating it into image refinement pipelines to guide the generation of higher-quality and more realistic images. Extensive experiments show that LEGION outperforms existing methods across multiple benchmarks, particularly surpassing the second-best traditional expert on SynthScars by 3.31% in mIoU and 7.75% in F1 score. Moreover, the refined images generated under its guidance exhibit stronger alignment with human preferences. The code, model, and dataset will be released.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
Code-in-the-Loop Forensics: Agentic Tool Use for Image Forgery Detection
ForenAgent lets MLLMs create and iteratively improve low-level Python tools for image forgery detection via a two-stage training pipeline and a new 100k-image benchmark dataset.
-
LaP-Forensics: Latent-Pixel Consistency Guided Multimodal Reasoning for Deepfake Detection
A dual-stream deepfake forensic model that adds DDIM reconstruction residuals to RGB features improves artifact localization and cross-generator detection in evaluations, with honest caveats about text faithfulness.
-
AIGI-Holmes: Towards Explainable and Generalizable AI-Generated Image Detection via Multimodal Large Language Models
AIGI-Holmes combines visual expert pretraining, SFT on explanation data, and direct preference optimization to deliver human-verifiable explanations and top detection accuracy on unseen AI generators.
-
Position: AI/ML Deepfake Research is Misaligned with AI-Generated Non-Consensual Intimate Imagery (AIG-NCII)
The dominant real-world use of generative-image abuse is non-consensual intimate imagery, yet the AI/ML research field focuses almost exclusively on viewer deception.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.