REVIEW 7 cited by
OThink-MR1: Stimulating multimodal generalized reasoning capabilities via dynamic reinforcement learning
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have gained significant traction for their ability to process diverse input data types and generate coherent, contextually relevant outputs across various applications. While supervised fine-tuning (SFT) has been the predominant approach to enhance MLLM capabilities in task-specific optimization, it often falls short in fostering crucial generalized reasoning abilities. Although reinforcement learning (RL) holds great promise in overcoming these limitations, it encounters two significant challenges: (1) its generalized capacities in multimodal tasks remain largely unexplored, and (2) its training constraints, including the constant Kullback-Leibler divergence or the clamp strategy, often result in suboptimal bottlenecks. To address these challenges, we propose OThink-MR1, an advanced MLLM equipped with profound comprehension and reasoning capabilities across multimodal tasks. Specifically, we introduce Group Relative Policy Optimization with a dynamic Kullback-Leibler strategy (GRPO-D), which markedly enhances reinforcement learning (RL) performance. For Qwen2-VL-2B-Instruct, GRPO-D achieves a relative improvement of more than 5.72% over SFT and more than 13.59% over GRPO in same-task evaluation on two adapted datasets. Furthermore, GRPO-D demonstrates remarkable cross-task generalization capabilities, with an average relative improvement of more than 61.63% over SFT in cross-task evaluation. These results highlight that the MLLM trained with GRPO-D on one multimodal task can be effectively transferred to another task, underscoring the superior generalized reasoning capabilities of our proposed OThink-MR1 model.
Forward citations
Cited by 7 Pith papers
-
BVS: Bayesian Visual Search with Multimodal Large Language Model for Fine-grained Perception
BVS combines early-stop attention rollout priors with a scale-aware non-stationary kernel and GP-UCB to locate tiny objects in UHR images more accurately and with fewer MLLM queries than prior visual-search methods.
-
VL-Cogito: Progressive Curriculum Reinforcement Learning for Advanced Multimodal Reasoning
VL-Cogito, trained with progressive curriculum RL, online difficulty weighting, and dynamic length rewards, matches or beats prior reasoning MLLMs on ten multimodal benchmarks.
-
OCR-Reasoning Benchmark: Unveiling the True Capabilities of MLLMs in Complex Text-Rich Image Reasoning
OCR-Reasoning, a 1,069-question benchmark with reasoning-chain annotations for text-rich images, finds that no evaluated multimodal model surpasses 50% accuracy.
-
VisReason: A Large-Scale Dataset for Visual Chain-of-Thought Reasoning
Fine-tuning Qwen2.5-VL on VisReason, a 489K-example multi-round visual chain-of-thought dataset (165K with pseudo-depth), modestly improves LLM-judged visual reasoning scores, with caveats about self-referential 3D ev...
-
APO: Enhancing Reasoning Ability of MLLMs via Asymmetric Policy Optimization
Asymmetric Policy Optimization, with adaptive KL shaping and length regularization for wrong answers, improves reasoning in a 3B multimodal model without hurting general performance.
-
WeThink: Toward General-purpose Vision-Language Reasoning via Reinforcement Learning
WeThink, a 120K-image QA dataset with AI-generated reasoning paths, combined with hybrid-reward reinforcement learning, improves a 7B vision-language model across 14 benchmarks.
-
Reinforcement Fine-Tuning Powers Reasoning Capability of Multimodal Large Language Models
A survey-style position paper claims that reinforcement fine-tuning powers reasoning in multimodal LLMs, summarizing over a hundred recent works and proposing five future research directions.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.