REVIEW 3 cited by
Modifying Large Language Model Post-Training for Diverse Creative Writing
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
As creative writing tasks do not have singular correct answers, large language models (LLMs) trained to perform these tasks should be able to generate diverse valid outputs. However, LLM post-training often focuses on improving generation quality but neglects to facilitate output diversity. Hence, in creative writing generation, we investigate post-training approaches to promote both output diversity and quality. Our core idea is to include deviation -- the degree of difference between a training sample and all other samples with the same prompt -- in the training objective to facilitate learning from rare high-quality instances. By adopting our approach to direct preference optimization (DPO) and odds ratio preference optimization (ORPO), we demonstrate that we can promote the output diversity of trained models while minimally decreasing quality. Our best model with 8B parameters could achieve on-par diversity as a human-created dataset while having output quality similar to the best instruction-tuned models we examined, GPT-4o and DeepSeek-R1. We further validate our approaches with a human evaluation, an ablation, and a comparison to an existing diversification approach, DivPO.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Verbalized Sampling: How to Mitigate Mode Collapse and Unlock LLM Diversity
Typicality bias (human preference for familiar text) is estimated as α>0 in preference data and mathematically sharpens aligned LLMs toward a single mode; prompting for a verbalized response distribution (Verbalized S...
-
LitBench: A Benchmark and Dataset for Reliable Evaluation of Creative Writing
Small reward models trained on LitBench reach 78% agreement with upvote-derived human preferences in creative writing, beating all zero-shot LLM judges tested.
-
On the Diversity of Analogy Making in Large Language Models
LLMs produce domain-homogeneous analogies (about two target domains per ten generations), and existing diversity-enhancement methods trade away quality without reliably broadening domains.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.