Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Local Projections or VARs? A Primer for Macroeconomists

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.17144 v2 pith:WWGYLG72 submitted 2025-03-21 econ.EM

classification econ.EM
keywords biascostlocalmacroeconomistsshouldvarswhatachieve
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

What should applied macroeconomists know about local projection (LP) and vector autoregression (VAR) impulse response estimators? The two methods share the same estimand, but in finite samples lie on opposite ends of a bias-variance trade-off. While the low bias of LPs comes at a quite steep variance cost, this cost must be paid to achieve robust uncertainty assessments. Hence, when the goal is to convey what can be learned about dynamic causal effects from the data, VARs should only be used with long lag lengths, ensuring equivalence with LP. For LP estimation, we provide guidance on selection of lag length and controls, bias correction, and confidence interval construction.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools