Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

4D-Bench: Benchmarking Multi-modal Large Language Models for 4D Object Understanding

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.17827 v1 pith:MMAB36NJ submitted 2025-03-22 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords understandingobjectmllmsd-benchmodelsobjectstemporalappearance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have demonstrated impressive 2D image/video understanding capabilities. However, there are no publicly standardized benchmarks to assess the abilities of MLLMs in understanding the 4D objects (3D objects with temporal evolution over time). In this paper, we introduce 4D-Bench, the first benchmark to evaluate the capabilities of MLLMs in 4D object understanding, featuring tasks in 4D object Question Answering (4D object QA) and 4D object captioning. 4D-Bench provides 4D objects with diverse categories, high-quality annotations, and tasks necessitating multi-view spatial-temporal understanding, different from existing 2D image/video-based benchmarks. With 4D-Bench, we evaluate a wide range of open-source and closed-source MLLMs. The results from the 4D object captioning experiment indicate that MLLMs generally exhibit weaker temporal understanding compared to their appearance understanding, notably, while open-source models approach closed-source performance in appearance understanding, they show larger performance gaps in temporal understanding. 4D object QA yields surprising findings: even with simple single-object videos, MLLMs perform poorly, with state-of-the-art GPT-4o achieving only 63\% accuracy compared to the human baseline of 91\%. These findings highlight a substantial gap in 4D object understanding and the need for further advancements in MLLMs.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Uni3D-MoE: Scalable Multimodal 3D Scene Understanding via Mixture of Experts

    cs.CV 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A sparse mixture-of-experts 3D multimodal LLM adaptively fuses RGB, RGBD, BEV, point cloud, and voxel tokens, achieving SOTA on several ScanNet-based 3D scene understanding benchmarks.

Pith tools