Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Enhancing Retrieval Systems with Inference-Time Logical Reasoning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.17860 v1 pith:GPTKAXSK submitted 2025-03-22 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords logicalretrievalreasoningqueriescomplexapproachcosinehandle
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Traditional retrieval methods rely on transforming user queries into vector representations and retrieving documents based on cosine similarity within an embedding space. While efficient and scalable, this approach often fails to handle complex queries involving logical constructs such as negations, conjunctions, and disjunctions. In this paper, we propose a novel inference-time logical reasoning framework that explicitly incorporates logical reasoning into the retrieval process. Our method extracts logical reasoning structures from natural language queries and then composes the individual cosine similarity scores to formulate the final document scores. This approach enables the retrieval process to handle complex logical reasoning without compromising computational efficiency. Our results on both synthetic and real-world benchmarks demonstrate that the proposed method consistently outperforms traditional retrieval methods across different models and datasets, significantly improving retrieval performance for complex queries.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. CoQuIR: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Code Quality-Aware Information Retrieval

    cs.SE 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A code retrieval benchmark with quality labels for correctness, efficiency, security, and maintainability shows most retrievers fail to prefer high-quality code, and quality-aware fine-tuning improves this without mea...

Pith tools