Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

I Have Covered All the Bases Here: Interpreting Reasoning Features in Large Language Models via Sparse Autoencoders

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.18878 v2 pith:VYV7BBXJ submitted 2025-03-24 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords reasoningfeaturesllmsmodelssparseautoencodersautomaticduring
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Recent LLMs like DeepSeek-R1 have demonstrated state-of-the-art performance by integrating deep thinking and complex reasoning during generation. However, the internal mechanisms behind these reasoning processes remain unexplored. We observe reasoning LLMs consistently use vocabulary associated with human reasoning processes. We hypothesize these words correspond to specific reasoning moments within the models' internal mechanisms. To test this hypothesis, we employ Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs), a technique for sparse decomposition of neural network activations into human-interpretable features. We introduce ReasonScore, an automatic metric to identify active SAE features during these reasoning moments. We perform manual and automatic interpretation of the features detected by our metric, and find those with activation patterns matching uncertainty, exploratory thinking, and reflection. Through steering experiments, we demonstrate that amplifying these features increases performance on reasoning-intensive benchmarks (+2.2%) while producing longer reasoning traces (+20.5%). Using the model diffing technique, we provide evidence that these features are present only in models with reasoning capabilities. Our work provides the first step towards a mechanistic understanding of reasoning in LLMs. Code available at https://github.com/AIRI-Institute/SAE-Reasoning

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Controllable LLM Reasoning via Sparse Autoencoder-Based Steering

    cs.AI 2026-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SAE-Steering finds, via keyword-logit recall plus effectiveness ranking, sparse-autoencoder features that steer a reasoning model into a chosen reasoning strategy, beating baseline steering by ~15% on a judge-based me...

  2. Reasoning-Finetuning Repurposes Latent Representations in Base Models

    cs.LG 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A steering vector computed from base model activations induces backtracking in DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Llama-8B, indicating reasoning fine-tuning repurposes pre-existing representations.

  3. Layer-Wise Perturbations via Sparse Autoencoders for Adversarial Text Generation

    cs.CL 2025-08 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    Sparse autoencoder activation perturbation (SFPF) applied on top of existing jailbreak prompts raises attack success rate on Qwen3-32B, but with no defense evaluation and weak reproducibility.

  4. Get Experience from Practice: LLM Agents with Record & Replay

    cs.LG 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    AgentRR is a proposed paradigm that records agent traces, generalizes them into multi-level experiences, and replays them under safety checks to make LLM agents cheaper, faster, and more reliable.

Pith tools