Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

A Survey of WebAgents: Towards Next-Generation AI Agents for Web Automation with Large Foundation Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.23350 v4 pith:XJHUVGCC submitted 2025-03-30 cs.AI

classification cs.AI
keywords tasksagentsdailywebagentslfmsresearchaspectsautomatically
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

With the advancement of web techniques, they have significantly revolutionized various aspects of people's lives. Despite the importance of the web, many tasks performed on it are repetitive and time-consuming, negatively impacting overall quality of life. To efficiently handle these tedious daily tasks, one of the most promising approaches is to advance autonomous agents based on Artificial Intelligence (AI) techniques, referred to as AI Agents, as they can operate continuously without fatigue or performance degradation. In the context of the web, leveraging AI Agents -- termed WebAgents -- to automatically assist people in handling tedious daily tasks can dramatically enhance productivity and efficiency. Recently, Large Foundation Models (LFMs) containing billions of parameters have exhibited human-like language understanding and reasoning capabilities, showing proficiency in performing various complex tasks. This naturally raises the question: `Can LFMs be utilized to develop powerful AI Agents that automatically handle web tasks, providing significant convenience to users?' To fully explore the potential of LFMs, extensive research has emerged on WebAgents designed to complete daily web tasks according to user instructions, significantly enhancing the convenience of daily human life. In this survey, we comprehensively review existing research studies on WebAgents across three key aspects: architectures, training, and trustworthiness. Additionally, several promising directions for future research are explored to provide deeper insights.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. DeepShop: A Benchmark for Deep Research Shopping Agents

    cs.IR 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DeepShop, a benchmark of 150 complex online shopping queries with fine-grained evaluation, shows that leading web agents and deep research systems achieve at most a 32% task success rate.

  2. LaMDAgent: An Autonomous Framework for Post-Training Pipeline Optimization via LLM Agents

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    An LLM-agent-driven search over fine-tuning and model-merging steps discovers post-training pipelines that beat fixed baselines by up to 9 points on tool use and 3.7 points on math, with caveats about held-out evaluation.

  3. Cybernaut: Towards Reliable Web Automation

    cs.SE 2025-08 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A demonstration-to-SOP framework plus robust element identification and a trace similarity metric improves enterprise web automation success rates on an internal benchmark, with a fine-tuned consistency classifier rea...

Pith tools