Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Survey on Unlearnable Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2503.23536 v3 pith:NEBIMDRQ submitted 2025-03-30 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords datalearningmachineunlearnablegenerationimperceptibilitymodelmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Unlearnable data (ULD) has emerged as an innovative defense technique to prevent machine learning models from learning meaningful patterns from specific data, thus protecting data privacy and security. By introducing perturbations to the training data, ULD degrades model performance, making it difficult for unauthorized models to extract useful representations. Despite the growing significance of ULD, existing surveys predominantly focus on related fields, such as adversarial attacks and machine unlearning, with little attention given to ULD as an independent area of study. This survey fills that gap by offering a comprehensive review of ULD, examining unlearnable data generation methods, public benchmarks, evaluation metrics, theoretical foundations and practical applications. We compare and contrast different ULD approaches, analyzing their strengths, limitations, and trade-offs related to unlearnability, imperceptibility, efficiency and robustness. Moreover, we discuss key challenges, such as balancing perturbation imperceptibility with model degradation and the computational complexity of ULD generation. Finally, we highlight promising future research directions to advance the effectiveness and applicability of ULD, underscoring its potential to become a crucial tool in the evolving landscape of data protection in machine learning.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Adversarial Attacks for Good: A Survey of Proactive Protection across the Visual Content Lifecycle

    cs.CR 2026-08 accept novelty 5.0 of 10

    The paper unifies privacy filters, unlearnable examples, generative safeguards, adversarial CAPTCHAs, and provenance marks into a single 'adversarial attacks for good' lifecycle and evaluates them along three common axes.

Pith tools